正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

pre-screen 100+ engineering candidates in 5 mins using gpt-vetting.

aliansarinik's profile picture

Ali Ansari

22,051 subscribers

5,215,821 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 条评论

Ali Ansari 的头像
Ali Ansari2 年前

We do not want a machine to determine a candidate's fate. Therefore, there is no concept of "passing" or "failing" in gpt-vetting. The objective is to provide employers with a comprehensive view by offering more data. This includes an AI-generated report based on all responses, as well as a transcript. This allows humans to review and listen to the answers, aiding them in deciding whether to proceed with interviewing the candidate. This process supplements the candidate's resume, LinkedIn profile, and other relevant data points that influence the employer's decision to interview. In summary, AI does not pass or fail candidates. Rather, it equips employers with additional data, enabling them to make more informed decisions about advancing candidates to the next stage of the interview process.

M 的头像
M2 年前

I don’t think this is a good idea. People will just start needing to research how to best optimize their resume for AI, adding more unnecessary complexity to job applications

Ali Ansari 的头像
Ali Ansari2 年前

its not a resume parser

Evan Otero 的头像
Evan Otero2 年前

These guys just wanna talk

AztkSmooth 的头像
AztkSmooth2 年前

Terrible product.

Texburgh 的头像
Texburgh2 年前

Imagine getting your career entirely determined by a mfing computer 💀💀💀💀

miss trial 的头像
miss trial2 年前

This feels illegal and anti-human

Stalowka🧯 的头像
Stalowka🧯2 年前

Terrible idea

相关视频

Excited to introduce the world’s first AI interviewer, gpt-vetting. With gpt-vetting, you can interview 100x more candidates in less time & candidates get a more enjoyable, gamified, and less biased interview experience. You define the skills you want the interview to focus on, gpt-vetting asks verbal questions, and then jumps into a coding exercise. You then review the report that includes an AI assessment of each tech stack, and a trust score. In its beta, gpt-vetting has already conducted 13,000 AI interviews, saving ~10k hours for software engineers who would otherwise be conducting technical interviews.
2:44

Excited to introduce the world’s first AI interviewer, gpt-vetting. With gpt-vetting, you can interview 100x more candidates in less time & candidates get a more enjoyable, gamified, and less biased interview experience. You define the skills you want the interview to focus on, gpt-vetting asks verbal questions, and then jumps into a coding exercise. You then review the report that includes an AI assessment of each tech stack, and a trust score. In its beta, gpt-vetting has already conducted 13,000 AI interviews, saving ~10k hours for software engineers who would otherwise be conducting technical interviews.

Ali Ansari

3,570,778 次观看 • 2 年前

GPT-6.1 Sol is out! Our colleague Kristel Cocoli asked GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6.1 Sol to "Build a cinematic, photorealistic rocket launch scene using Three.js" GPT-6.1 Sol: $0.553 | 17 mins GPT-6 Sol: $1.01 | 22 mins Try it in JetBrains Air or Junie. OpenAI Developers
0:22

GPT-6.1 Sol is out! Our colleague Kristel Cocoli asked GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6.1 Sol to "Build a cinematic, photorealistic rocket launch scene using Three.js" GPT-6.1 Sol: $0.553 | 17 mins GPT-6 Sol: $1.01 | 22 mins Try it in JetBrains Air or Junie. OpenAI Developers

JetBrains

64,706 次观看 • 1 个月前

using pomodoro tonight (5 mins study, 30 mins socmed)
0:30

using pomodoro tonight (5 mins study, 30 mins socmed)

liyah

467,370 次观看 • 1 年前

Are you even a designer if you haven’t spent your weekend using GPT-6 Astra to replace QR codes for screen to screen scanning?
0:25

Are you even a designer if you haven’t spent your weekend using GPT-6 Astra to replace QR codes for screen to screen scanning?

Maxime De Greve

40,443 次观看 • 1 个月前

built this using antigravity + chatgpt + figma in ~100 mins 👀 (idea → moodboard → images → design → live)
0:34

built this using antigravity + chatgpt + figma in ~100 mins 👀 (idea → moodboard → images → design → live)

Shruti

1,098,777 次观看 • 2 个月前

Can GPT-4 code an entire game for you? Yes, yes it can. Here's how I recreated a Snake game that runs in your browser using Chat GPT-4 and Replit ⠕, with ZERO knowledge of Javascript all in less than 20 mins 🧵
0:29

Can GPT-4 code an entire game for you? Yes, yes it can. Here's how I recreated a Snake game that runs in your browser using Chat GPT-4 and Replit ⠕, with ZERO knowledge of Javascript all in less than 20 mins 🧵

Ammaar Reshi

3,930,382 次观看 • 3 年前

blender test of gpt 6.1 terra model made this hatchet in blender in less than 5 mins and cost was about $1 i don't know what they fed this model but it's the fastest model and i'm using it on max not even fast mode
0:32

blender test of gpt 6.1 terra model made this hatchet in blender in less than 5 mins and cost was about $1 i don't know what they fed this model but it's the fastest model and i'm using it on max not even fast mode

J A Z I I

20,881 次观看 • 10 天前

Made using just 3 prompts in GPT Astra
0:25

Made using just 3 prompts in GPT Astra

Lax Acharya

28,050 次观看 • 2 个月前

How to Setup a US bank account in less than 5 mins using the Akuna Wallet App ‼️‼️
0:47

How to Setup a US bank account in less than 5 mins using the Akuna Wallet App ‼️‼️

Dessy Ocean

11,558 次观看 • 5 个月前

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.
0:30

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

167,004 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here is my workflow for creating ai drama ads like these in 5 mins : > GPT 5 sol for the prompting . > GPT 2 for the characters . > Seedance 2.5 + omni for the video generation. >GPT 6 for the editing and speed up the dead areas. RT + Comment "Prompt" for the exact prompts i used for creating this .
1:23

Here is my workflow for creating ai drama ads like these in 5 mins : > GPT 5 sol for the prompting . > GPT 2 for the characters . > Seedance 2.5 + omni for the video generation. >GPT 6 for the editing and speed up the dead areas. RT + Comment "Prompt" for the exact prompts i used for creating this .

whotanish

28,147 次观看 • 1 个月前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT 6.1 Sol I tested this rocket launch scene and DeepSeek absolutely cooked with this model. DeepSeek : $0.78, 3 mins GPT 6.1 Sol: $6.10, 5 mins Nearly 8x cheaper than Sol, and faster too. This thing is a beast.
0:25

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT 6.1 Sol I tested this rocket launch scene and DeepSeek absolutely cooked with this model. DeepSeek : $0.78, 3 mins GPT 6.1 Sol: $6.10, 5 mins Nearly 8x cheaper than Sol, and faster too. This thing is a beast.

Bhavy☄️

112,195 次观看 • 19 天前

GPT-5 just dropped in Azure AI Foundry. Devs can tap into the full suite of GPT-5 models with a single endpoint using Foundry’s AI-powered model router. Intelligent model selection, so you can build with ease. Start Building:
0:50

GPT-5 just dropped in Azure AI Foundry. Devs can tap into the full suite of GPT-5 models with a single endpoint using Foundry’s AI-powered model router. Intelligent model selection, so you can build with ease. Start Building:

Microsoft Azure

82,096 次观看 • 1 年前

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
0:34

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

Lentils

207,512 次观看 • 4 个月前