Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Presidents should, consistent with Article II, have the power to fire anyone working in the executive branch—with the vice president being the sole exception

BasedMikeLee's profile picture

Mike Lee

641,288 subscribers

248,852 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНаука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Jackson Doyle for Florida 🇺🇸
Jackson Doyle for Florida 🇺🇸1 год назад

I totally agree. The fact this has to be said shows how far we have fallen. @BasedMikeLee

Фото профиля STAT
STAT1 год назад

Here’s a rundown of Trump’s health policy stances and his potential top priorities in a second administration.

Фото профиля Alpha-Bravo
Alpha-Bravo1 год назад

Exactlt 💯

Фото профиля IX
IX1 год назад

Commander in chief. Chief prosecutor. Head of the executive branch. Everyone serves at the pleasure of the president.

Фото профиля Yappy American Broad
Yappy American Broad1 год назад

I catch myself mistaking you and Dana White every time one of you pops up on my feed over the past few days. Twinning.

Фото профиля Evan Guthrie
Evan Guthrie1 год назад

Time to clean house. Fresh start.

Фото профиля Breezy P
Breezy P1 год назад

100% agree!!!

Фото профиля Terri 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Terri 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿1 год назад

Amen, Mike!

Фото профиля Frank Truslow
Frank Truslow1 год назад

Yes...100% I hope he get's to it.

Фото профиля 2VNews
2VNews1 год назад

Nice!

Фото профиля Dark Light
Dark Light1 год назад

Bingo

Похожие видео

Let’s be clear: President Donald J. Trump can fire executive branch employees. SCOTUS has even sided with President Trump on this. If the guy elected to RUN the Executive Branch can’t fire the people working IN the Executive Branch, who’s actually in charge?
1:11

Let’s be clear: President Donald J. Trump can fire executive branch employees. SCOTUS has even sided with President Trump on this. If the guy elected to RUN the Executive Branch can’t fire the people working IN the Executive Branch, who’s actually in charge?

Senator Rand Paul

37,661 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Clarification on the Fed and Trump’s power: “The President has power under Article II of the Constitution to fire any of these executive branch officers… if people argue that he does NOT have this power, then the Fed is unconstitutional." 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
3:59

Clarification on the Fed and Trump’s power: “The President has power under Article II of the Constitution to fire any of these executive branch officers… if people argue that he does NOT have this power, then the Fed is unconstitutional." 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

NanLee Marie Carissimi

23,614 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”
1:03

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”

Federalist Society

24,723 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

President Trump has every right to fire Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve. Alongside his statutory power, President Trump has the power under Article II to fire any executive branch officers. And if people argue that he does not have that power, then the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional. The Federal Reserve might not want to die on this hill, because we can’t have a corrupt governor on the Fed board. Thanks for having me, FOX Business.
9:07

President Trump has every right to fire Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve. Alongside his statutory power, President Trump has the power under Article II to fire any executive branch officers. And if people argue that he does not have that power, then the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional. The Federal Reserve might not want to die on this hill, because we can’t have a corrupt governor on the Fed board. Thanks for having me, FOX Business.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

56,897 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Judges aren’t presidents and they aren’t politicians. They shouldn’t be issuing nationwide injunctions knowing they can’t stand litigation with the sole intention of slowing the constitutional authority granted to the Executive Branch.
0:53

Judges aren’t presidents and they aren’t politicians. They shouldn’t be issuing nationwide injunctions knowing they can’t stand litigation with the sole intention of slowing the constitutional authority granted to the Executive Branch.

Mike Lee

30,141 просмотров • 1 год назад

USAID was created by executive order. A judge correctly ruled that President Trump has the Article II power to reduce these agencies down to the statutory minimum. The recourse for fired bureaucrats is not judicial sabotage that we've seen against President Trump over the last six months. These courts now understand executive power because of President Trump and Attorney General Pamela Bondi's monumental wins at the Supreme Court. All executive power under Article II belongs to the President. These are huge wins for the presidency.
13:51

USAID was created by executive order. A judge correctly ruled that President Trump has the Article II power to reduce these agencies down to the statutory minimum. The recourse for fired bureaucrats is not judicial sabotage that we've seen against President Trump over the last six months. These courts now understand executive power because of President Trump and Attorney General Pamela Bondi's monumental wins at the Supreme Court. All executive power under Article II belongs to the President. These are huge wins for the presidency.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

118,615 просмотров • 1 год назад

REPORTER: The administration appears to have started dismantling the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Does the administration not believe that it's important to keep toys and cribs off the market? LEAVITT: It's a federal agency within the executive branch. Who's the head of the executive branch? The president. He has the right to fire people within the executive branch.
0:36

REPORTER: The administration appears to have started dismantling the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Does the administration not believe that it's important to keep toys and cribs off the market? LEAVITT: It's a federal agency within the executive branch. Who's the head of the executive branch? The president. He has the right to fire people within the executive branch.

Aaron Rupar

1,321,115 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 The Constitution is Clear – The Executive Power is Vested in the President, NOT the Courts! 🚨 🔥 Rep. Harriet Hageman drops the truth bomb the Left doesn't want to hear. Article II of the U.S. Constitution is crystal clear: The executive power is vested in the President of the United States. 👉 That means: ✔ The President defines the executive branch—not the courts. ✔ No judge has the right to limit, redefine, or interfere with the duties of executive officials. ✔ The separation of powers is real, and the judiciary doesn’t get to rewrite the Constitution to target political opponents. But here’s the real issue—lawfare is being used as a weapon against President Donald J. Trump Trump. Since 2017, we’ve seen the courts politicized and manipulated to try to take him down. 🔹 They’ve used phony cases. 🔹 They’ve abused the system to interfere in elections. 🔹 They’ve set a dangerous precedent that threatens all future presidents. 💥 THE FIGHT FOR EXECUTIVE POWER IS THE FIGHT FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE. 🔥 Hageman DESTROYS the Left’s argument: 📢 “The President defines the scope and duties of his office—not the courts!” 📢 “If we don’t protect the Executive Branch, the courts will make the President powerless.” 📢 “This is about stopping the weaponization of the law for political revenge.” ⚠️ IF THEY CAN DO THIS TO President Donald J. Trump TRUMP, THEY CAN DO IT TO ANY PRESIDENT. ⚠️ 🚨 WHAT DO YOU THINK? 🔁 REPOST if you stand with Rep. Hageman on protecting executive power! 💬 Comment below—should courts have the power to limit the President’s authority?
5:23

🚨 The Constitution is Clear – The Executive Power is Vested in the President, NOT the Courts! 🚨 🔥 Rep. Harriet Hageman drops the truth bomb the Left doesn't want to hear. Article II of the U.S. Constitution is crystal clear: The executive power is vested in the President of the United States. 👉 That means: ✔ The President defines the executive branch—not the courts. ✔ No judge has the right to limit, redefine, or interfere with the duties of executive officials. ✔ The separation of powers is real, and the judiciary doesn’t get to rewrite the Constitution to target political opponents. But here’s the real issue—lawfare is being used as a weapon against President Donald J. Trump Trump. Since 2017, we’ve seen the courts politicized and manipulated to try to take him down. 🔹 They’ve used phony cases. 🔹 They’ve abused the system to interfere in elections. 🔹 They’ve set a dangerous precedent that threatens all future presidents. 💥 THE FIGHT FOR EXECUTIVE POWER IS THE FIGHT FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE. 🔥 Hageman DESTROYS the Left’s argument: 📢 “The President defines the scope and duties of his office—not the courts!” 📢 “If we don’t protect the Executive Branch, the courts will make the President powerless.” 📢 “This is about stopping the weaponization of the law for political revenge.” ⚠️ IF THEY CAN DO THIS TO President Donald J. Trump TRUMP, THEY CAN DO IT TO ANY PRESIDENT. ⚠️ 🚨 WHAT DO YOU THINK? 🔁 REPOST if you stand with Rep. Hageman on protecting executive power! 💬 Comment below—should courts have the power to limit the President’s authority?

Francois Leclerc

184,381 просмотров • 1 год назад

CHAD MIZELLE: It says in Article II, all executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States. That means if the president doesn't like how you're using HIS executive power, HE'S FREE TO TELL YOU TO STOP! So if you are not on board with the president's agenda, he's free to say, "You're not allowed to use my executive power. In fact, I don't want you in my government." Chad Mizelle
0:55

CHAD MIZELLE: It says in Article II, all executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States. That means if the president doesn't like how you're using HIS executive power, HE'S FREE TO TELL YOU TO STOP! So if you are not on board with the president's agenda, he's free to say, "You're not allowed to use my executive power. In fact, I don't want you in my government." Chad Mizelle

Bannon’s WarRoom

18,185 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Phillip: So in other words, you're okay with presidents from here on out directing who should be prosecuted in this country and who should not? Jennings: I'm okay with the head of the executive branch expressing his opinion.
1:40

Phillip: So in other words, you're okay with presidents from here on out directing who should be prosecuted in this country and who should not? Jennings: I'm okay with the head of the executive branch expressing his opinion.

Acyn

90,900 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

ABOLISH ICE. Replace it with an agency controlled solely by Congress, not the Executive Branch. It’s time to strip power away from the Executive Branch and put it in the hands of THE PEOPLE.
1:13

ABOLISH ICE. Replace it with an agency controlled solely by Congress, not the Executive Branch. It’s time to strip power away from the Executive Branch and put it in the hands of THE PEOPLE.

Kyle Sweetser

13,506 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Johnson: I have no intention of getting in the way of President Trump and his administration. He has used the tariff power that he has under Article II. He has not exceeded his authority. There is no reason for the Article I branch to intervene.
1:25

Johnson: I have no intention of getting in the way of President Trump and his administration. He has used the tariff power that he has under Article II. He has not exceeded his authority. There is no reason for the Article I branch to intervene.

Acyn

1,142,461 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.
1:27

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.

Senator Rand Paul

217,084 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад