正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Presidents should, consistent with Article II, have the power to fire anyone working in the executive branch—with the vice president being the sole exception

Mike Lee

641,288 subscribers

248,852 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Jackson Doyle for Florida 🇺🇸 的头像

Jackson Doyle for Florida 🇺🇸1 年前

I totally agree. The fact this has to be said shows how far we have fallen. @BasedMikeLee

STAT 的头像

STAT1 年前

Here’s a rundown of Trump’s health policy stances and his potential top priorities in a second administration.

Alpha-Bravo 的头像

Alpha-Bravo1 年前

Exactlt 💯

IX 的头像

IX1 年前

Commander in chief. Chief prosecutor. Head of the executive branch. Everyone serves at the pleasure of the president.

Yappy American Broad 的头像

Yappy American Broad1 年前

I catch myself mistaking you and Dana White every time one of you pops up on my feed over the past few days. Twinning.

Evan Guthrie 的头像

Evan Guthrie1 年前

Time to clean house. Fresh start.

Breezy P 的头像

Breezy P1 年前

100% agree!!!

Terri 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 的头像

Terri 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿1 年前

Amen, Mike!

Frank Truslow 的头像

Frank Truslow1 年前

Yes...100% I hope he get's to it.

2VNews 的头像

2VNews1 年前

Nice!

Dark Light 的头像

Dark Light1 年前

Bingo

相关视频

Let’s be clear: President Donald J. Trump can fire executive branch employees. SCOTUS has even sided with President Trump on this. If the guy elected to RUN the Executive Branch can’t fire the people working IN the Executive Branch, who’s actually in charge?

Let’s be clear: President Donald J. Trump can fire executive branch employees. SCOTUS has even sided with President Trump on this. If the guy elected to RUN the Executive Branch can’t fire the people working IN the Executive Branch, who’s actually in charge?

Senator Rand Paul

37,661 次观看 • 10 个月前

Clarification on the Fed and Trump’s power: “The President has power under Article II of the Constitution to fire any of these executive branch officers… if people argue that he does NOT have this power, then the Fed is unconstitutional." 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Clarification on the Fed and Trump’s power: “The President has power under Article II of the Constitution to fire any of these executive branch officers… if people argue that he does NOT have this power, then the Fed is unconstitutional." 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

NanLee Marie Carissimi

23,614 次观看 • 11 个月前

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”

Federalist Society

24,723 次观看 • 2 个月前

President Trump has every right to fire Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve. Alongside his statutory power, President Trump has the power under Article II to fire any executive branch officers. And if people argue that he does not have that power, then the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional. The Federal Reserve might not want to die on this hill, because we can’t have a corrupt governor on the Fed board. Thanks for having me, FOX Business.

President Trump has every right to fire Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve. Alongside his statutory power, President Trump has the power under Article II to fire any executive branch officers. And if people argue that he does not have that power, then the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional. The Federal Reserve might not want to die on this hill, because we can’t have a corrupt governor on the Fed board. Thanks for having me, FOX Business.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

56,897 次观看 • 11 个月前

Judges aren’t presidents and they aren’t politicians. They shouldn’t be issuing nationwide injunctions knowing they can’t stand litigation with the sole intention of slowing the constitutional authority granted to the Executive Branch.

Judges aren’t presidents and they aren’t politicians. They shouldn’t be issuing nationwide injunctions knowing they can’t stand litigation with the sole intention of slowing the constitutional authority granted to the Executive Branch.

Mike Lee

30,141 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 The Constitution is Clear – The Executive Power is Vested in the President, NOT the Courts! 🚨 🔥 Rep. Harriet Hageman drops the truth bomb the Left doesn't want to hear. Article II of the U.S. Constitution is crystal clear: The executive power is vested in the President of the United States. 👉 That means: ✔ The President defines the executive branch—not the courts. ✔ No judge has the right to limit, redefine, or interfere with the duties of executive officials. ✔ The separation of powers is real, and the judiciary doesn’t get to rewrite the Constitution to target political opponents. But here’s the real issue—lawfare is being used as a weapon against President Donald J. Trump Trump. Since 2017, we’ve seen the courts politicized and manipulated to try to take him down. 🔹 They’ve used phony cases. 🔹 They’ve abused the system to interfere in elections. 🔹 They’ve set a dangerous precedent that threatens all future presidents. 💥 THE FIGHT FOR EXECUTIVE POWER IS THE FIGHT FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE. 🔥 Hageman DESTROYS the Left’s argument: 📢 “The President defines the scope and duties of his office—not the courts!” 📢 “If we don’t protect the Executive Branch, the courts will make the President powerless.” 📢 “This is about stopping the weaponization of the law for political revenge.” ⚠️ IF THEY CAN DO THIS TO President Donald J. Trump TRUMP, THEY CAN DO IT TO ANY PRESIDENT. ⚠️ 🚨 WHAT DO YOU THINK? 🔁 REPOST if you stand with Rep. Hageman on protecting executive power! 💬 Comment below—should courts have the power to limit the President’s authority?

🚨 The Constitution is Clear – The Executive Power is Vested in the President, NOT the Courts! 🚨 🔥 Rep. Harriet Hageman drops the truth bomb the Left doesn't want to hear. Article II of the U.S. Constitution is crystal clear: The executive power is vested in the President of the United States. 👉 That means: ✔ The President defines the executive branch—not the courts. ✔ No judge has the right to limit, redefine, or interfere with the duties of executive officials. ✔ The separation of powers is real, and the judiciary doesn’t get to rewrite the Constitution to target political opponents. But here’s the real issue—lawfare is being used as a weapon against President Donald J. Trump Trump. Since 2017, we’ve seen the courts politicized and manipulated to try to take him down. 🔹 They’ve used phony cases. 🔹 They’ve abused the system to interfere in elections. 🔹 They’ve set a dangerous precedent that threatens all future presidents. 💥 THE FIGHT FOR EXECUTIVE POWER IS THE FIGHT FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE. 🔥 Hageman DESTROYS the Left’s argument: 📢 “The President defines the scope and duties of his office—not the courts!” 📢 “If we don’t protect the Executive Branch, the courts will make the President powerless.” 📢 “This is about stopping the weaponization of the law for political revenge.” ⚠️ IF THEY CAN DO THIS TO President Donald J. Trump TRUMP, THEY CAN DO IT TO ANY PRESIDENT. ⚠️ 🚨 WHAT DO YOU THINK? 🔁 REPOST if you stand with Rep. Hageman on protecting executive power! 💬 Comment below—should courts have the power to limit the President’s authority?

Francois Leclerc

184,381 次观看 • 1 年前

USAID was created by executive order. A judge correctly ruled that President Trump has the Article II power to reduce these agencies down to the statutory minimum. The recourse for fired bureaucrats is not judicial sabotage that we've seen against President Trump over the last six months. These courts now understand executive power because of President Trump and Attorney General Pamela Bondi's monumental wins at the Supreme Court. All executive power under Article II belongs to the President. These are huge wins for the presidency.

USAID was created by executive order. A judge correctly ruled that President Trump has the Article II power to reduce these agencies down to the statutory minimum. The recourse for fired bureaucrats is not judicial sabotage that we've seen against President Trump over the last six months. These courts now understand executive power because of President Trump and Attorney General Pamela Bondi's monumental wins at the Supreme Court. All executive power under Article II belongs to the President. These are huge wins for the presidency.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

118,615 次观看 • 1 年前

REPORTER: The administration appears to have started dismantling the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Does the administration not believe that it's important to keep toys and cribs off the market? LEAVITT: It's a federal agency within the executive branch. Who's the head of the executive branch? The president. He has the right to fire people within the executive branch.

REPORTER: The administration appears to have started dismantling the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Does the administration not believe that it's important to keep toys and cribs off the market? LEAVITT: It's a federal agency within the executive branch. Who's the head of the executive branch? The president. He has the right to fire people within the executive branch.

Aaron Rupar

1,321,196 次观看 • 1 年前

CHAD MIZELLE: It says in Article II, all executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States. That means if the president doesn't like how you're using HIS executive power, HE'S FREE TO TELL YOU TO STOP! So if you are not on board with the president's agenda, he's free to say, "You're not allowed to use my executive power. In fact, I don't want you in my government." Chad Mizelle

CHAD MIZELLE: It says in Article II, all executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States. That means if the president doesn't like how you're using HIS executive power, HE'S FREE TO TELL YOU TO STOP! So if you are not on board with the president's agenda, he's free to say, "You're not allowed to use my executive power. In fact, I don't want you in my government." Chad Mizelle

Bannon’s WarRoom

18,185 次观看 • 6 个月前

ABOLISH ICE. Replace it with an agency controlled solely by Congress, not the Executive Branch. It’s time to strip power away from the Executive Branch and put it in the hands of THE PEOPLE.

ABOLISH ICE. Replace it with an agency controlled solely by Congress, not the Executive Branch. It’s time to strip power away from the Executive Branch and put it in the hands of THE PEOPLE.

Kyle Sweetser

13,506 次观看 • 27 天前

Phillip: So in other words, you're okay with presidents from here on out directing who should be prosecuted in this country and who should not? Jennings: I'm okay with the head of the executive branch expressing his opinion.

Phillip: So in other words, you're okay with presidents from here on out directing who should be prosecuted in this country and who should not? Jennings: I'm okay with the head of the executive branch expressing his opinion.

Acyn

90,900 次观看 • 10 个月前

Johnson: I have no intention of getting in the way of President Trump and his administration. He has used the tariff power that he has under Article II. He has not exceeded his authority. There is no reason for the Article I branch to intervene.

Johnson: I have no intention of getting in the way of President Trump and his administration. He has used the tariff power that he has under Article II. He has not exceeded his authority. There is no reason for the Article I branch to intervene.

Acyn

1,142,461 次观看 • 6 个月前

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.

In 2023, I opposed an outrageous amendment that barred any president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. I voted against handcuffing the President & for preserving his Article II authority to terminate treaties. The Founders placed this power in the executive, unlike a divided Congress, because only the President can speak with one voice & act with the speed needed to negotiate or exit treaties.

Senator Rand Paul

217,084 次观看 • 4 个月前