Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

11,719 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Birds with a higher BMR tend to take more risks because they operate under greater energetic constraints (Mathot et al., 2014). Since these birds burn energy quickly, they cannot afford to wait for dangers to pass; instead, they must seek out "the most improbable, the most demanding, confusing, even threatening situations" (Peat). For Adélie penguins, the extreme cold of the Antarctic creates constant energetic pressure. As their large colonies reach the limits of available energy (Ballance et al., 2009), competition for prey becomes a matter of life or death. This pressure compels a few highly energetic penguins to travel farther and take greater risks, fueled by an internal engine that refuses to remain idle. In the documentary Encounters at the End of the World (2007), Werner Herzog portrays a solitary Adélie penguin leaving its colony and the food-rich ocean to march toward a distant mountain range. Herzog frames this as an existential figure "heading towards certain death," describing the action as "insanity," while scientists like Dr. David Ainley regard the penguin as "deranged" and "disoriented." "But why?" Herzog asked. During filming, icebergs B-15 and C-16 blocked nutrient-rich currents at Cape Royds and Cape Bird, diminishing phytoplankton growth by up to 95% (Arrigo & van Dijken, 2003; Wienecke, 2002). By 2006, bird colonies were experiencing catastrophic food shortages as these icebergs crushed breeding habitats and forced penguins to trek 60 to 80 miles over solid ice to find open water (Emmerson & Southwell, 2022; NASA, 2002). This led to nearly zero chick survival and a staggering decline in breeding pairs (National Science Foundation, 2001). What Herzog perceives as "insanity" is a response to unsustainable energetic debt (Barracho et al., 2025). When the metabolic needs of a solitary penguin exceed what a starving colony can provide, its journey to the mountains becomes a fatal gamble. With a body temperature above 100°F (Williams et al., 2015), penguins process information with high efficiency and possess a high density of neurons in their forebrains (Olkowicz et al., 2016). Under the crushing stress of the iceberg blockage, this neural capacity narrows into a singular focus. While the majority of the colony remains anchored to the coast, a high metabolic rate can trigger a sudden, sharp clarity of action (Thierry et al., 2014). This singular fixation begins to override the instinct to accept the mundanity of the pact, creating an internal divergence from the rest of the colony. This solitary penguin stands apart. Driven by an internal fire that demands movement over stagnation, the same fire shared with human seafaring and nomadic conquest, it prepares to exert its agency in a way the colony cannot follow. As it gazes back at its loved ones, its peers, and its old life for the final time, it turns and marches forward, never looking back. In this moment, Herzog’s depiction parallels the "Rückenfigur" technique of Friedrich. Confronting a vast, inhospitable expanse of ice, the penguin mirrors the figure in "Wanderer above the Sea of Fog" (1818), standing before a white, misty void that symbolizes the "sublime", a beauty so immense it is both awe-inspiring and terrifying. When the cost of staying put equals the risk of venturing into the unknown, what seems like "insanity" becomes a definitive act of discovery. This was true for Erik the Red’s explorations toward the icy landmass of Greenland, for Leif Erikson as he crossed the North Atlantic, and for Flóki Vilgerðarson, who climbed the high mountain in the north and named it "Iceland." High metabolic rates drive the desire to seek out challenging situations, allowing organisms to evolve and differentiate. While the pursuit of the impossible is often romanticized, it is the willingness to take definitive action, to march toward the mountains when the sea has failed, that fosters change and allows the fire of the organism to be fully expressed.

Dang

12,109 views • 6 months ago

🧵 Why Russia Can’t Stop the War—Even If It Wanted To (Part I) I/1 The brutality of the Ukraine war is not hidden—it’s broadcast to the world daily in countless frontline videos. In one, a Russian soldier is struck by a drone, writhes on the ground, and then turns his rifle on himself. In another, a man collapses mid-advance; his comrade doesn’t hesitate—he raises his weapon and delivers a final shot. Sometimes, an armored vehicle speeds to the front, unloads its human cargo, then reverses and disappears. The soldiers left behind scatter under drone fire, encircled by artillery, like prey abandoned in open ground. The war has morphed into a meat grinder of history. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Russian casualties have now exceeded one million. Approximately 11.4 soldiers—Russian and Ukrainian—have been killed for every square kilometer of Ukrainian territory currently under Russian control. Measured in blood per square kilometer, the Ukraine war is the deadliest territorial war of the 21st century—and one of the most expensive in human life since World War I. It is a war of drones and trenches, of staggering attrition and static front lines. The land gained is real, but the cost—11 men dead for every square kilometer—recalls the meat grinders of Verdun and the Some of WWI far more than the sweeping tank advances of 20th century blitzkrieg. The question now is no longer why Moscow entered the war. The real question is: why can’t it leave? Back in February, the Trump administration floated a proposal. Recognize Crimea as Russian. Prevent Ukraine from ever joining NATO. Lift all sanctions imposed since 2014. By April, the offer expanded: a ceasefire along the current line of contact, essentially conceding Russia's grip on four Eastern Ukrainian regions. A pragmatic power would have seized such an offer. But Russia didn’t. This isn’t about reason anymore. This is gambler’s logic. A war, once started, is no longer a question of whether to stop—but when it becomes too late to stop without losing everything. Had these terms been available in early 2022, Putin would have taken them. At that time, they would have seemed like a strategic coup. But the war has changed shape. What was once a “special operation” is now a national commitment. Russia today controls around 114,000 square kilometers of Ukraine. But according to the Kiel Institute, the price of war has climbed to $873 billion—while the total annual GDP of these occupied regions amounts to just $28 billion. Even by the cold logic of profit and loss, Russia would need to control these areas for 31 years just to break even. And that’s just the money. Over a million casualties later, the war has rewritten Russia’s political calculus. To retreat now would be to betray the blood already spilled. It would provoke fury from nationalist factions and from within the ranks of the military. On June 20, Putin gave a revealing speech in St. Petersburg: “The Russian and Ukrainian peoples are one and the same. In this sense, all of Ukraine should belong to Russia.” That was no mere rhetoric. It was the clearest signal yet that Russia's war aims have shifted—from securing the Donbas to absorbing the whole of Ukraine. History repeats itself. In the early 1700s, Peter the Great launched the Great Northern War seeking only access to the Baltic Sea. But after suffering early defeats and investing more deeply, he didn’t stop at one port—he broke Swedish dominance in all of Eastern Europe. When sunk costs accumulate, so do ambitions.

America-China Watcher

23,422 views • 1 year ago

Receipts part 2: To the American people: Listen closely. This isn't about politics—it's about truth, justice, and the blood-soaked history your taxes help hide. We in Republic of Somaliland have carried the scars of genocide for decades. Now, one of your Congresswomen walks boldly into the lion's den... and smiles. Why? Because she's no prey—she's royalty. Her true name? Ilhan Nur Said Elmi. Father? Nur Said Elmi (aka Nur Omar), Colonel in Siad Barre's army. Soviet-trained. Part of the command that turned Hargeisa into rubble. Tens of thousands—up to 200,000 Isaaq civilians—bombed, executed, raped, starved in the late '80s. We call it the Isaaq Genocide. The world still looks away. The mastermind? Major General Mohammed Said Hersi "Morgan"—"The Butcher of Hargeisa." Barre's son-in-law. On tape: "Kill the wounded. Poison wells. Burn villages. Leave nothing but crows." His forces kidnapped, tortured, disappeared thousands in Somaliland. Families still search for mass graves. December 2022: Ilhan Omar flies to Somalia, the headquarters of the old regime's loyalists, where many of those war-era figures and their networks still hold sway. The same region that sheltered remnants after Barre fell. Wouldn't a Congresswoman—especially one claiming to be a refugee from that very regime's terror—be target number one in the kidnapping capital of the region? Yes. Yet she arrives, attends events, gets honored... no fear, no incident. But she's no ordinary congresswoman—she's the regime's royalty. At an official event thrown in her honor she's seated just seats away from the Butcher himself—Gen. Morgan. Photos don't lie. Her siblings pose smiling beside him like family. No fear. No hiding. No bodyguards glancing over shoulders. Why? Because she's not escaping the past—she's returning to it. Royalty among the remnants. Think: If her family were genuine victims fleeing Barre's collapse in '91—running from Mogadishu to camps—why return to the heart of the old power, cozy up to the man who orchestrated the nightmare her people endured? A real refugee would be hunted, targeted. Instead, she's welcomed, honored, unafraid. She condemns violence in Gaza, Ukraine, Iran—demands justice abroad. But on the genocide her own family served? Silence. On reuniting with the Butcher of Hargeisa ? Crickets. Somaliland remembers every grave, every burned village, every missing name. America, you gave her refuge, power, a voice. Now ask: Whose truth is she telling? Today, she wields her power as a Congresswoman not for justice, but for injustice—to block the only democratic, free country in the Horn of Africa the Republic of Somaliland. We've built an army and security forces that keep out pirates, al-Shabaab terrorists and to protect our women and children from Somalia if they try to erase us again. We stand as a beacon of stability in a chaotic region. We've achieved what few thought possible: Multiple peaceful, multi-party elections with regular transfers of power And in a world-first innovation, we pioneered iris-based biometric voter registration—the most advanced system globally—to ensure fair, duplicate-free elections and build unbreakable trust in our democracy. yet she uses American influence to block our growth, block justice, and deny us the recognition we earned through blood and progress. We were once a recognized country. In 1960, the U.S. Secretary of State Christian Herter sent a congratulatory letter to our Council of Ministers on our independence from Britain. Over 35 countries—including United States, United Kingdom, France, Soviet Union recognized the State of Somaliland. Later we entered a failed, corrupt union with Somalia in good faith—but that merger was never legally ratified. The Act of Union was never properly signed, harmonized, or ratified by both sides as a single binding document. Somaliland's legislature passed one version but Somalia approved a different one "in principle" and never enacted it fully. No mutual ratification, no valid treaty under international law. The union was defective from day one—yet we suffered its consequences for decades. Democrats have looked away for far too long. Now it's up to the Republican Party and President Donald J. Trump to take a stand. We ask for the ultimate payback. Recognize the Republic of Somaliland, and the world will follow—America's path of justice. Republic of Somaliland is ready to stand as a partner for freedom, security, and democracy. The crows still circle Hargeisa's ruins. Your Congresswoman posed with their keeper. Time for truth, recognition, and justice. #RecognizeSomaliland #IsaaqGenocide

REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND

48,223 views • 4 months ago