Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Prince Harry needs state security funded protection. End of

33,488 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

36 Kommentare

Profilbild von ArtsCulture
ArtsCulturevor 10 Tagen

He can pay for it.

Profilbild von Narinder Kaur
Narinder Kaurvor 10 Tagen

He offered They refused

Profilbild von 👑The Office of Cee Bee
👑The Office of Cee Beevor 10 Tagen

Why would a junkie and a malignant narcissist who pissed off smirking on a 'freedom flight' and then slagged off their previous Boss to line their own filthy pockets be entitled to ANYTHING?? Hairball & his wife/boss/handler/2ndMummy GET security as & when deemed necessary whilst they're darkening our shores but they want 24/7 security and IPP status (to cover up their dodgy dealings). They weren't even entitled to 24/7 security when HE did a part-time stint as a working Royal and SHE had a Summer job with the BRF - so they can both f*ck off back to the shallow end of the HollyWeird swamp where SHE was convinced HIS Royal titles would make her a billionaire and a global phenomenon but ended up struggling for continued deals after so many failures and LIES and became a global laughing stock.

Profilbild von johngardner
johngardnervor 10 Tagen

No he doesn’t and luckily your opinion is irrelevant

Profilbild von robert smith
robert smithvor 10 Tagen

Earl spencer just two years after Diana died told Larry king the then prince Charles had done and said nothing to upset him during that time. He also in an interview said anyone profiting from a siblings death was disgusting and he would Never do it. So we have proof he is a liar

Profilbild von roverite
roveritevor 10 Tagen

So does farage but you won’t say that

Profilbild von Emz
Emzvor 10 Tagen

RAVEC doesn't care about your opinion and quite frankly neither does anyone else that matters.

Profilbild von Alf Garnett
Alf Garnettvor 10 Tagen

No, he doesn’t automatically “need state-funded protection”. He chose to step back from royal duties and is now a private citizen. Security should be based on an objective threat assessment—not entitlement. If he wants extra protection beyond that, he can pay for it himself. 🤡

Profilbild von Hazel mckinlay
Hazel mckinlayvor 10 Tagen

Why does need it? RAVEC have assessed the need and deemed it not necessary. So please tell us why you say he does. Do you have information that RAVEC are not privvy to?

Profilbild von Phillip Owen
Phillip Owenvor 10 Tagen

Why?.. princess Anne doesn't get full security and she's a working royal....once again Narinder you are wrong!!!

Profilbild von Keith Fuller Dip SM
Keith Fuller Dip SMvor 10 Tagen

Needs to FO back to the USA and take that so called actress with him

Profilbild von ⚽️ Bren Kilmartin ⚽️
⚽️ Bren Kilmartin ⚽️vor 10 Tagen

Yet you’ve constantly criticised William and his family for costing the tax payer!!! You really are a hypocritical dumb dumb. 😳

Profilbild von tricia
triciavor 10 Tagen

You pay for it then!!!

Profilbild von TSLifetime
TSLifetimevor 10 Tagen

Y do u make faces while talking, it makes U look unhinged.. also stop lying, NO FBI said nothing of the sort, privately hired team who Harry pays, their opinion doesn’t count! NO monarchy wouldn’t end, not in your lifetime.. 5th line doesn’t matter, will never to the throne

Profilbild von mo fo
mo fovor 10 Tagen

He can go back to America. End of.

Profilbild von John Kennaugh
John Kennaughvor 10 Tagen

Why should he have it? The only reason he has come back to the UK is to promote Spencer's book.

Profilbild von BRUMMY
BRUMMYvor 10 Tagen

Racist!

Profilbild von Ana
Anavor 10 Tagen

No Harry doesn’t need tax payers funded 24/7 police protection. Period.

Profilbild von Hdhxha
Hdhxhavor 10 Tagen

Narinder just set up your own go fun dme for him and if people want to pay towards it then they can, but the general public shouldn’t be made to have their taxes go towards more shit they didnt ask for

Profilbild von Kerry Martindale
Kerry Martindalevor 10 Tagen

24/08/2026 you wrote The Royal Family are the biggest spongers in history. And now you want Harry and Meghan to sponge 12 million off the public. You can’t have it both ways. The fact they will do NO Royal engagements for the money would make them bigger spongers.

Profilbild von philsutton87
philsutton87vor 10 Tagen

No he does not. He decided to leave the royal family so why should we still have to pay for his security. And don’t even get me started with his wife

Profilbild von Pastor_Dutchie
Pastor_Dutchievor 10 Tagen

You mean tax payer funded? Fuck off

Profilbild von Tommy Trinder
Tommy Trindervor 10 Tagen

Perhap people of your opinion so happy to spend tax payers money on millionaires, put your hand in your pocket to pay for them!! They made their bed...

Profilbild von lampers
lampersvor 10 Tagen

Pipe down! He left the Royal family, trashed the hell out of them, became private citizens, their choice. He’s come back to the country they slated, why should tax payers fund their security! Perhaps Charles Spencer can fund it, with the profits of his book!

Profilbild von Sharon Adair
Sharon Adairvor 10 Tagen

@narindertweets Listen you daft clown you can pay for mr private citizen’s security!!! Oh and Charles Spencer is a lying POS like his pathetic nephew!!!

Profilbild von phil salkeld
phil salkeldvor 10 Tagen

No he doesn’t He is a private citizen He should get the same police protection as us normal people Which is to say None The police are useless twats Just like you

Profilbild von robert smith
robert smithvor 10 Tagen

So the fbi say they know of credible threats so he got state funded security in america then oh no wait it was a private security firm just like he has here in the uk. So why should we pay for security of a private citizen. He made his bed now he can lie in it.

Profilbild von Olu ッ
Olu ッvor 10 Tagen

He’s made his bed he needs to fuck off.

Profilbild von Teresa 🇺🇸
Teresa 🇺🇸vor 10 Tagen

Make sure Ann and her family get it and don’t forget Edward and his Family for sure and even though Andrew is a swine like Hazben make sure he and his family get it as they are all siblings of the current king!

Profilbild von Janette King
Janette Kingvor 10 Tagen

Let him have it if RAVEC has carried out a full risk assessment & say it warrants it, but with conditions: it is not to be abused and flaunted by him and his family, nor should they encroach on anything Royal. Adhere to the Sandringham agreement at all times. Radicalised tho'?

Profilbild von daisy
daisyvor 10 Tagen

This is what you are reduced to? 🤣. Begging for interaction on X to pay your bills . You pay for his security

Profilbild von The Press Office Of HRH Riley Dog 🦖
The Press Office Of HRH Riley Dog 🦖vor 10 Tagen

Then you pay for it

Profilbild von Tracy E
Tracy Evor 10 Tagen

Harry gets adequate security .. he don’t need 24/7 armed security.

Profilbild von GaryG1708
GaryG1708vor 10 Tagen

No he does not he has chosen to step aside. He can afford his own security. He is nothing more than a parasite

Profilbild von WTB
WTBvor 10 Tagen

He’s a private citizen. If the U.K was so scary, why move back. It isn’t to get closer to the family. Oh, right, he wants IPP status so all their shenanigans will be never come to light.

Profilbild von Matthew
Matthewvor 10 Tagen

Think this is the first time she’s ever stood up for a white Brit.

Ähnliche Videos

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle DO NOT NEED taxpayer-funded security in the UK. And let’s clear up another ridiculous claim: Harry has NOT been “denied security,” despite what some people are screaming around like headless chickens. Under the bespoke arrangements put in place after Harry stepped back, requests for protective police security are made on a case-by-case basis, with 28-30 days’ notice, so the authorities can assess the circumstances and threat before deciding what protection, if any, is appropriate. He also has his own privately funded security. What he does NOT have is an automatic entitlement to a taxpayer-funded police protection detail simply because he is Prince Harry. There is a difference between being denied security and being denied the level of taxpayer-funded protection you demand. And for everyone repeating, “But Harry said he’ll pay for it” - that is not how police protection works. Police protection is NOT a private service that a wealthy individual can simply purchase because they are willing to write a cheque. Police resources are limited and are allocated according to threat, risk and public interest. Harry also seems to think being a prince entitles him to the sort of highly visible police protection associated with the King and the heir. It doesn’t. Even other members of the Royal Family do not automatically receive that level of protection simply because they are royal. Harry and Meghan already have private security. What they appear to want is the added status, visibility and resources that come with a police escort. And frankly, if this is supposedly all about an overwhelming security threat, why are their movements constantly being briefed to the media? Why does everyone need to know where they are going and when they are going there? You cannot spend your time telling the world about your movements and then demand that the taxpayer provide an extraordinary level of protection because you are supposedly at extraordinary risk. You don’t get to have the perks of the Crown without the duty to the Crown.

Queen Esther

28,213 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat