Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Prince Harry needs state security funded protection. End of

33,488 views • 10 days ago •via X (Twitter)

36 Comments

ArtsCulture's profile picture
ArtsCulture10 days ago

He can pay for it.

Narinder Kaur's profile picture
Narinder Kaur10 days ago

He offered They refused

👑The Office of Cee Bee's profile picture
👑The Office of Cee Bee10 days ago

Why would a junkie and a malignant narcissist who pissed off smirking on a 'freedom flight' and then slagged off their previous Boss to line their own filthy pockets be entitled to ANYTHING?? Hairball & his wife/boss/handler/2ndMummy GET security as & when deemed necessary whilst they're darkening our shores but they want 24/7 security and IPP status (to cover up their dodgy dealings). They weren't even entitled to 24/7 security when HE did a part-time stint as a working Royal and SHE had a Summer job with the BRF - so they can both f*ck off back to the shallow end of the HollyWeird swamp where SHE was convinced HIS Royal titles would make her a billionaire and a global phenomenon but ended up struggling for continued deals after so many failures and LIES and became a global laughing stock.

johngardner's profile picture
johngardner10 days ago

No he doesn’t and luckily your opinion is irrelevant

robert smith's profile picture
robert smith10 days ago

Earl spencer just two years after Diana died told Larry king the then prince Charles had done and said nothing to upset him during that time. He also in an interview said anyone profiting from a siblings death was disgusting and he would Never do it. So we have proof he is a liar

roverite's profile picture
roverite10 days ago

So does farage but you won’t say that

Emz's profile picture
Emz10 days ago

RAVEC doesn't care about your opinion and quite frankly neither does anyone else that matters.

Alf Garnett's profile picture
Alf Garnett10 days ago

No, he doesn’t automatically “need state-funded protection”. He chose to step back from royal duties and is now a private citizen. Security should be based on an objective threat assessment—not entitlement. If he wants extra protection beyond that, he can pay for it himself. 🤡

Hazel mckinlay's profile picture
Hazel mckinlay10 days ago

Why does need it? RAVEC have assessed the need and deemed it not necessary. So please tell us why you say he does. Do you have information that RAVEC are not privvy to?

Phillip Owen's profile picture
Phillip Owen10 days ago

Why?.. princess Anne doesn't get full security and she's a working royal....once again Narinder you are wrong!!!

Keith Fuller Dip SM's profile picture
Keith Fuller Dip SM10 days ago

Needs to FO back to the USA and take that so called actress with him

⚽️ Bren Kilmartin ⚽️'s profile picture
⚽️ Bren Kilmartin ⚽️10 days ago

Yet you’ve constantly criticised William and his family for costing the tax payer!!! You really are a hypocritical dumb dumb. 😳

tricia's profile picture
tricia10 days ago

You pay for it then!!!

TSLifetime's profile picture
TSLifetime10 days ago

Y do u make faces while talking, it makes U look unhinged.. also stop lying, NO FBI said nothing of the sort, privately hired team who Harry pays, their opinion doesn’t count! NO monarchy wouldn’t end, not in your lifetime.. 5th line doesn’t matter, will never to the throne

mo fo's profile picture
mo fo10 days ago

He can go back to America. End of.

John Kennaugh's profile picture
John Kennaugh10 days ago

Why should he have it? The only reason he has come back to the UK is to promote Spencer's book.

BRUMMY's profile picture
BRUMMY10 days ago

Racist!

Ana's profile picture
Ana10 days ago

No Harry doesn’t need tax payers funded 24/7 police protection. Period.

Hdhxha's profile picture
Hdhxha10 days ago

Narinder just set up your own go fun dme for him and if people want to pay towards it then they can, but the general public shouldn’t be made to have their taxes go towards more shit they didnt ask for

Kerry Martindale's profile picture
Kerry Martindale10 days ago

24/08/2026 you wrote The Royal Family are the biggest spongers in history. And now you want Harry and Meghan to sponge 12 million off the public. You can’t have it both ways. The fact they will do NO Royal engagements for the money would make them bigger spongers.

philsutton87's profile picture
philsutton8710 days ago

No he does not. He decided to leave the royal family so why should we still have to pay for his security. And don’t even get me started with his wife

Pastor_Dutchie's profile picture
Pastor_Dutchie10 days ago

You mean tax payer funded? Fuck off

Tommy Trinder's profile picture
Tommy Trinder10 days ago

Perhap people of your opinion so happy to spend tax payers money on millionaires, put your hand in your pocket to pay for them!! They made their bed...

lampers's profile picture
lampers10 days ago

Pipe down! He left the Royal family, trashed the hell out of them, became private citizens, their choice. He’s come back to the country they slated, why should tax payers fund their security! Perhaps Charles Spencer can fund it, with the profits of his book!

Sharon Adair's profile picture
Sharon Adair10 days ago

@narindertweets Listen you daft clown you can pay for mr private citizen’s security!!! Oh and Charles Spencer is a lying POS like his pathetic nephew!!!

phil salkeld's profile picture
phil salkeld10 days ago

No he doesn’t He is a private citizen He should get the same police protection as us normal people Which is to say None The police are useless twats Just like you

robert smith's profile picture
robert smith10 days ago

So the fbi say they know of credible threats so he got state funded security in america then oh no wait it was a private security firm just like he has here in the uk. So why should we pay for security of a private citizen. He made his bed now he can lie in it.

Olu ッ's profile picture
Olu ッ10 days ago

He’s made his bed he needs to fuck off.

Teresa 🇺🇸's profile picture
Teresa 🇺🇸10 days ago

Make sure Ann and her family get it and don’t forget Edward and his Family for sure and even though Andrew is a swine like Hazben make sure he and his family get it as they are all siblings of the current king!

Janette King's profile picture
Janette King10 days ago

Let him have it if RAVEC has carried out a full risk assessment & say it warrants it, but with conditions: it is not to be abused and flaunted by him and his family, nor should they encroach on anything Royal. Adhere to the Sandringham agreement at all times. Radicalised tho'?

daisy's profile picture
daisy10 days ago

This is what you are reduced to? 🤣. Begging for interaction on X to pay your bills . You pay for his security

The Press Office Of HRH Riley Dog 🦖's profile picture
The Press Office Of HRH Riley Dog 🦖10 days ago

Then you pay for it

Tracy E's profile picture
Tracy E10 days ago

Harry gets adequate security .. he don’t need 24/7 armed security.

GaryG1708's profile picture
GaryG170810 days ago

No he does not he has chosen to step aside. He can afford his own security. He is nothing more than a parasite

WTB's profile picture
WTB10 days ago

He’s a private citizen. If the U.K was so scary, why move back. It isn’t to get closer to the family. Oh, right, he wants IPP status so all their shenanigans will be never come to light.

Matthew's profile picture
Matthew10 days ago

Think this is the first time she’s ever stood up for a white Brit.

Related Videos

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle DO NOT NEED taxpayer-funded security in the UK. And let’s clear up another ridiculous claim: Harry has NOT been “denied security,” despite what some people are screaming around like headless chickens. Under the bespoke arrangements put in place after Harry stepped back, requests for protective police security are made on a case-by-case basis, with 28-30 days’ notice, so the authorities can assess the circumstances and threat before deciding what protection, if any, is appropriate. He also has his own privately funded security. What he does NOT have is an automatic entitlement to a taxpayer-funded police protection detail simply because he is Prince Harry. There is a difference between being denied security and being denied the level of taxpayer-funded protection you demand. And for everyone repeating, “But Harry said he’ll pay for it” - that is not how police protection works. Police protection is NOT a private service that a wealthy individual can simply purchase because they are willing to write a cheque. Police resources are limited and are allocated according to threat, risk and public interest. Harry also seems to think being a prince entitles him to the sort of highly visible police protection associated with the King and the heir. It doesn’t. Even other members of the Royal Family do not automatically receive that level of protection simply because they are royal. Harry and Meghan already have private security. What they appear to want is the added status, visibility and resources that come with a police escort. And frankly, if this is supposedly all about an overwhelming security threat, why are their movements constantly being briefed to the media? Why does everyone need to know where they are going and when they are going there? You cannot spend your time telling the world about your movements and then demand that the taxpayer provide an extraordinary level of protection because you are supposedly at extraordinary risk. You don’t get to have the perks of the Crown without the duty to the Crown.

Queen Esther

28,213 views • 1 month ago