Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Princeton Professor shows how easy it is to hack electronic voting machines. The researchers craft a virus that exploits software flaws in the machine's operating system. Votes are silently redirected from one candidate to another, symbolizing how an attacker could "steal" an election without detection. The machine's interface shows... no signs of tampering, and the final tally reflects the altered results. The hack leaves no traceable evidence on the machine itself, as the malware erases its tracks after execution. This makes post-election audits challenging without independent verification methods. The entire process takes mere minutes, emphasizing that such attacks are not the domain of nation-state actors alone but could be executed by motivated individuals or groups with moderate resources. The part that anyone could buy costs $4 dollars and this was just ONE simple demonstration from all the way back in the 2006 to 2008 era. Now it's even easier and done remotely with built-in back doors.show more

The SCIF

313,505 subscribers

201,228 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The SCIF

20,548 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A Dominion voting machine was hacked in real-time, in a Georgia court, during election expert Halderman's testimony, changing vote totals on the spot, done with no tools, just a simple ballpoint pen that was borrowed from the Dominion defense side of the court room. The demonstration proved just one way electronic voting machines can be hacked by someone with the knowledge in minutes and completely change election results, on top of the overwhelming number of other vulnerabilities, especially when they're connected to the internet and originally designed by foreign nations to steal elections in the first place.

A Dominion voting machine was hacked in real-time, in a Georgia court, during election expert Halderman's testimony, changing vote totals on the spot, done with no tools, just a simple ballpoint pen that was borrowed from the Dominion defense side of the court room. The demonstration proved just one way electronic voting machines can be hacked by someone with the knowledge in minutes and completely change election results, on top of the overwhelming number of other vulnerabilities, especially when they're connected to the internet and originally designed by foreign nations to steal elections in the first place.

The SCIF

173,352 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Maricopa County Election Director admits in court that employees were logging in to the election system FROM HOME to REMOTELY verify ballot signatures in the 2020 election and others, with ZERO OBSERVERS, or any physical oversight whatsoever. This creates a major security vulnerability and lack of transparency/chain-of-custody in one of the most important steps of the ballot verification process. 21%-25% or 420,000+ ballots in Maricopa County alone failed signature verification. ANYONE could be accessing the data from someone's house or that worker could be hacked and gain access to the entire system. This is a HUGE breach of security and compromised the entire 2020 and 2022 elections.

Maricopa County Election Director admits in court that employees were logging in to the election system FROM HOME to REMOTELY verify ballot signatures in the 2020 election and others, with ZERO OBSERVERS, or any physical oversight whatsoever. This creates a major security vulnerability and lack of transparency/chain-of-custody in one of the most important steps of the ballot verification process. 21%-25% or 420,000+ ballots in Maricopa County alone failed signature verification. ANYONE could be accessing the data from someone's house or that worker could be hacked and gain access to the entire system. This is a HUGE breach of security and compromised the entire 2020 and 2022 elections.

The SCIF

244,000 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING: Voters in Tarrant County, Texas are reporting that the voting machines are flipping their votes from Trump to Kamala Harris The voters are urging everyone else to check their printed ballots before submitting them. "Reports were that people who selected Trump on the screen were seeing Harris on the printed ballot." - This is according to Tarrant GOP Chair @Bo_French_TX This stuff boils my blood. Why does Tarrant County utilize such an obviously vulnerable system? This also shows that it's not just Dominion machines that are corrupt. ALL voting machines are intrinsically evil. We need to go back to voting in person on election day, with human hands as the counting method. So far, we have seen reports of flips like this happening in Tennesee, Georgia, and now Texas. This sets a precedent for us to demand the publicizing of all the machine data and the proprietary software. It's a good thing we're catching it before the election and NOT after.

BREAKING: Voters in Tarrant County, Texas are reporting that the voting machines are flipping their votes from Trump to Kamala Harris The voters are urging everyone else to check their printed ballots before submitting them. "Reports were that people who selected Trump on the screen were seeing Harris on the printed ballot." - This is according to Tarrant GOP Chair @Bo_French_TX This stuff boils my blood. Why does Tarrant County utilize such an obviously vulnerable system? This also shows that it's not just Dominion machines that are corrupt. ALL voting machines are intrinsically evil. We need to go back to voting in person on election day, with human hands as the counting method. So far, we have seen reports of flips like this happening in Tennesee, Georgia, and now Texas. This sets a precedent for us to demand the publicizing of all the machine data and the proprietary software. It's a good thing we're catching it before the election and NOT after.

George

9,145,975 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Watch how the 2020 election was stolen and how they are able to count the same ballot more than once or flip thousands of votes from one candidate to another at the click of a button through the adjudication process. This is just another tactic in combination with mail-in ballots and compromised machines of how our elections are stolen.

Watch how the 2020 election was stolen and how they are able to count the same ballot more than once or flip thousands of votes from one candidate to another at the click of a button through the adjudication process. This is just another tactic in combination with mail-in ballots and compromised machines of how our elections are stolen.

The SCIF

34,412 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Smartmatic, in the Philippine house, admits that electronic election data could be deleted in the middle of the night, and nobody would even know. When Smartmatic was forced to sell in the US over its Venezuela links, it retained the Intellectual Property of its software. This software ran on machines in our 2020 election and continues today. Well the founder of Smartmatic was just arrested over money laundering and bribery charges in the Philippines. This must not end with just this.

Smartmatic, in the Philippine house, admits that electronic election data could be deleted in the middle of the night, and nobody would even know. When Smartmatic was forced to sell in the US over its Venezuela links, it retained the Intellectual Property of its software. This software ran on machines in our 2020 election and continues today. Well the founder of Smartmatic was just arrested over money laundering and bribery charges in the Philippines. This must not end with just this.

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

315,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

If America wants secure elections, the path is brutally simple. Lock the system down and make cheating impossible: - No internet on voting machines. Offline, sealed, untouchable. - Pre-election inspections so every machine is certified and tamper-proof. - Watermarked paper ballots for fast counts and undeniable audits. - Clean custody. Every ballot tracked from vote to final tally. Do that, and the system becomes impossible to rig. Elon Musk led an aggressive 2024 counter-operation that stopped the steal before it even started. He saw the real numbers, called Trump’s win early, and his team jammed the systems that enable electronic fraud. It was the first fair election we’ve seen in years. Every election could be the same. Shut off the internet, secure the machines, watermark the ballots. That’s how you save elections.

If America wants secure elections, the path is brutally simple. Lock the system down and make cheating impossible: - No internet on voting machines. Offline, sealed, untouchable. - Pre-election inspections so every machine is certified and tamper-proof. - Watermarked paper ballots for fast counts and undeniable audits. - Clean custody. Every ballot tracked from vote to final tally. Do that, and the system becomes impossible to rig. Elon Musk led an aggressive 2024 counter-operation that stopped the steal before it even started. He saw the real numbers, called Trump’s win early, and his team jammed the systems that enable electronic fraud. It was the first fair election we’ve seen in years. Every election could be the same. Shut off the internet, secure the machines, watermark the ballots. That’s how you save elections.

Benny Johnson

413,042 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

After a 68% error rate with mail-in ballots was found in the Michigan 2020 election, a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Machines by election experts was performed, the results were released by a judge that read: "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should NOT be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."

After a 68% error rate with mail-in ballots was found in the Michigan 2020 election, a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Machines by election experts was performed, the results were released by a judge that read: "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should NOT be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."

The SCIF

792,045 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Election officials testify that DOMINION voting machines were sending and receiving signals through wifi and connecting to the internet in an active voting location during the 2020 election. A Georgia election official also testified that QR codes located on ballots were used to tabulate votes through the machines instead of the markings made by voters on the actual ballots themselves. This proves that there is no way to actually confirm that Joe Biden won the 2020 election because the QR code can not be read or verified by election officials to determine what the QR code is actually telling the voting machines to tabulate for since it is not reading the actual filled in selections by the voter. This is just another variable and method to program the machines to manipulate, read, and rig an election in your favor.

Election officials testify that DOMINION voting machines were sending and receiving signals through wifi and connecting to the internet in an active voting location during the 2020 election. A Georgia election official also testified that QR codes located on ballots were used to tabulate votes through the machines instead of the markings made by voters on the actual ballots themselves. This proves that there is no way to actually confirm that Joe Biden won the 2020 election because the QR code can not be read or verified by election officials to determine what the QR code is actually telling the voting machines to tabulate for since it is not reading the actual filled in selections by the voter. This is just another variable and method to program the machines to manipulate, read, and rig an election in your favor.

The SCIF

152,165 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"As an officer of the court, you were willing to put your name on a legal pleading alleging that the machines used in Georgia in 2018 were switching votes illegally from one candidate to another. Is that correct?" "YES." When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits under oath that voting machines in Georgia SWITCHED VOTES from one candidate to another, we have a huge security problem in our elections. What's even more alarming is the machines that were used in that 2018 election that switched votes, were already a major concern when Garland Favorito from VoterGA warned the SOS that those machines were compromised, which the SOS did nothing about until years later. Here's where it gets worse. The machines were finally banned right before the 2020 election and replaced with Dominion machines and software, which were even more vulnerable and lacked security, audit capabilities and paper trails, implemented QR codes, etc., and featured backdoors which can be remotely accessed anywhere in the world with the capability to alter and manipulate anything in an election.

"As an officer of the court, you were willing to put your name on a legal pleading alleging that the machines used in Georgia in 2018 were switching votes illegally from one candidate to another. Is that correct?" "YES." When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits under oath that voting machines in Georgia SWITCHED VOTES from one candidate to another, we have a huge security problem in our elections. What's even more alarming is the machines that were used in that 2018 election that switched votes, were already a major concern when Garland Favorito from VoterGA warned the SOS that those machines were compromised, which the SOS did nothing about until years later. Here's where it gets worse. The machines were finally banned right before the 2020 election and replaced with Dominion machines and software, which were even more vulnerable and lacked security, audit capabilities and paper trails, implemented QR codes, etc., and featured backdoors which can be remotely accessed anywhere in the world with the capability to alter and manipulate anything in an election.

The SCIF

54,302 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! One of the two auditors for the Arizona 2020 election, SLI compliance, was used to certify the Phillipines Smartmatic machines for their problematic 2016 election. In this video, Smartmatic in the Philippine house, admits that electronic election data could be deleted in the middle of the night, and nobody would even know. Also not too long ago, the founder of Smartmatic was arrested over money laundering and bribery charges in the Philippines. One person from Comelac was charged too. Anywho, here’s what SLI compliance has to say about the Phillipine 2016 election: ♦️SLI Compliance Testing Paves Way for Successful Presidential Election in the Philippines “More than 55.7 million voters cast ballots in the recent Philippine presidential election, and that massive turnout could be a foreshadowing of the U.S. election this November. The tremendous election process success was due in part to the testing conducted by SLI Compliance®. SLI Compliance, formerly known as SLI Global Solutions, was contracted by the Philippine Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to conduct a series of audits to analyze and test the source code, the software and the vote counting machines. SLI Compliance has tested systems for COMELEC in 2010, 2011, 2013, and now in 2016, SLI tested COMELEC’s entire voting system, including scanners, election management software and consolidation systems. “If U.S. primaries and caucuses are any indication, this will be a monumental election year, and the potential of record voter turnout is enough to keep election officials up at night wondering if their teams and their voting equipment machines are ready,” said Traci Mapps, SLI Compliance’s Director of Operations. “Now is the time to prepare by thoroughly testing voting systems and process, and SLI Compliance has the experience and expertise elections officials can trust.””

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! One of the two auditors for the Arizona 2020 election, SLI compliance, was used to certify the Phillipines Smartmatic machines for their problematic 2016 election. In this video, Smartmatic in the Philippine house, admits that electronic election data could be deleted in the middle of the night, and nobody would even know. Also not too long ago, the founder of Smartmatic was arrested over money laundering and bribery charges in the Philippines. One person from Comelac was charged too. Anywho, here’s what SLI compliance has to say about the Phillipine 2016 election: ♦️SLI Compliance Testing Paves Way for Successful Presidential Election in the Philippines “More than 55.7 million voters cast ballots in the recent Philippine presidential election, and that massive turnout could be a foreshadowing of the U.S. election this November. The tremendous election process success was due in part to the testing conducted by SLI Compliance®. SLI Compliance, formerly known as SLI Global Solutions, was contracted by the Philippine Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to conduct a series of audits to analyze and test the source code, the software and the vote counting machines. SLI Compliance has tested systems for COMELEC in 2010, 2011, 2013, and now in 2016, SLI tested COMELEC’s entire voting system, including scanners, election management software and consolidation systems. “If U.S. primaries and caucuses are any indication, this will be a monumental election year, and the potential of record voter turnout is enough to keep election officials up at night wondering if their teams and their voting equipment machines are ready,” said Traci Mapps, SLI Compliance’s Director of Operations. “Now is the time to prepare by thoroughly testing voting systems and process, and SLI Compliance has the experience and expertise elections officials can trust.””

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

24,281 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Dominion ICX machines are able to scan, tabulate, and MARK ballots AFTER the last time a voter handles their ballot. You are even able to program the machine to mimic a "human," not neatly filling in the bubble to hide the fact that a machine filled in the selection. This combined with the engineered features to purposely cause errors in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballots can be changed and marked at the click of a button with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail is the perfect combination to rig and steal an election. This is just ONE method of FRAUD that was performed in order to steal the 2020 election. With mail-in fraudulent ballots, voters, and remote access on top, you're guaranteed to never lose an election again.

The Dominion ICX machines are able to scan, tabulate, and MARK ballots AFTER the last time a voter handles their ballot. You are even able to program the machine to mimic a "human," not neatly filling in the bubble to hide the fact that a machine filled in the selection. This combined with the engineered features to purposely cause errors in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballots can be changed and marked at the click of a button with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail is the perfect combination to rig and steal an election. This is just ONE method of FRAUD that was performed in order to steal the 2020 election. With mail-in fraudulent ballots, voters, and remote access on top, you're guaranteed to never lose an election again.

The SCIF

30,964 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

SMARTMATIC'S own CEO exposes that machines can be used to rig elections, including voter turnout data that can be artificially inflated or deflated through software tweaks, skewing results without immediate detection. Beyond turnout tampering, the CEO outlines various exploitation methods, from vote flipping via algorithmic errors to backdoor access that could allow unauthorized changes remotely. The owner of the election equipment company that we use in U.S. elections just told you that the machines can be manipulated to rig elections and go undetected. That alone tells you everything you need to know.

SMARTMATIC'S own CEO exposes that machines can be used to rig elections, including voter turnout data that can be artificially inflated or deflated through software tweaks, skewing results without immediate detection. Beyond turnout tampering, the CEO outlines various exploitation methods, from vote flipping via algorithmic errors to backdoor access that could allow unauthorized changes remotely. The owner of the election equipment company that we use in U.S. elections just told you that the machines can be manipulated to rig elections and go undetected. That alone tells you everything you need to know.

The SCIF

17,118 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

2026 Fulton County Election Fraud Report finds THOUSANDS of FALSE BALLOTS added to the post-election hand count/audit, which lowered Biden's margin of victory and vote total by about 50,000 to 60,000 votes, indicating that Trump did indeed win Georgia in the 2020 election. This isn't even counting all of the other fraud found GA. As a result of the 36 errors, 6,691 fictitious ballots that do not exist were added to the "Total Ballots Cast" column. After removing the false ballots from the total, because they do not exist, Fulton County's corrected Total Ballots Cast for the hand count/audit is 521,341, or 7,436 ballots less than the certified Nov. 3rd total of 528,777. Of these, candidate Trump received 1,025 false votes that do not exist, while candidate Biden received 5,618 false votes that do not exist. Correcting for the errors from only the absentee ballots of one county, the hand count/audit results yield a margin of victory that is 4,593 votes less than the November 3rd results. 11,779 was the total margin of victory for the entire state. A review of only 3 percent of the ballots yielded errors that falsely inflated the margin of victory for the hand count/audit by one-third. Based on these errors alone, the margin of victory drops to 7,185. The 36 errors mysteriously added a sufficient number of ballots and votes to substantiate the November 3rd results, albeit falsely. Just as the hand count/audit was used as a metric to corroborate the November 3rd results, the errors call those results in to question. First, there was no investigation beyond that which was carried out by Mr. Rossi and the Governor's office as the Secretary of State's investigator did not perform an investigation. Second, the claim that the error were unintentional is refuted by the fact that 35 of the 36 inconsistencies benefited one candidate. Next, the failures were not the product of data entry errors. Lastly, the conclusion and excuse that the errors did not affect the outcome of the presidential contest is irrelevant and not responsive to the allegation, as the race for president extended past the Fulton County line, and so did the "errors" that were found. It gets even better... A total of eight 8 false batch entries are included in the results in which candidate Trump erroneously receives ZERO votes, and almost all are supported with a batch tally sheet. Errors with a batch tally sheet that don’t match the corresponding ballots are not the product of mistake or unintentional error. It is indisputable that the batch tally sheets identified by Mr. Rossi and Governor Kemp were intentionally fabricated to falsely pad the hand-count/audit results in line with the November 3rd results. Georgia law explicitly states that any superintendent or employee who intentionally destroys or alters tally papers, or permits them to be destroyed or altered, shall be guilty of a felony. Fulton County's chaotic, unaccountable curation and processing of cast ballots, cast BMD printout, and electronic records make a true risk-limiting audit impossible. It is unreasonable for voters to trust that their votes were counted at all, much less counted correctly. Voters have good reason to believe that some votes counted more than others, some votes were included twice or 3x in the totals. There is no way to know how many votes were omitted from the tabulation, absent access to the physical ballots and BMD printout and evidence that the chain of custody is intact. From the records produced so far, it Is impossible to determine whether malware, bugs, misconfiguration, or malfeasance disenfranchised voters or altered the election results. The fact that thousands of false ballots and votes were unveiled should have triggered a real investigation, not only of Fulton County's November 3rd election results, but those of the entire state. We can use the same mathematical basis as the Risk Limiting Audit by using Fulton County’s rate of error- and extrapolate. Approximately 148,000 absentee ballots were cast in Fulton County, and out of those, 6,691, 4.52%, were found to be false, or in error. A total of 1,311,061 absentee ballots were cast in the state of Georgia for the 2020 General Election. Using the same percentage, 4.52%, of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: 1,311,061 x .0452 = 59,259 false ballots/votes Using the same ratio of distribution of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: Candidate Biden: 83.9% of 59,259 = 49,718 false votes Candidate Trump: 15.3% of 59,259 = 9,066 false votes Therefore, using the Fulton County hand count/audit error rate, as established by the Governor's report on just the absentee ballots cast, the error rate is determinative, and it is possible that the wrong candidate did take office. Ms. McGowan's assertion that the hand count/audit errors did not affect the outcome of the race, is not supported by fact. Given the egregious manipulation in Fulton County, failing and/or refusing to check the hand count/audit results of the other 158 counties constitutes gross negligence, if not willful misconduct and fraud. On top of these findings, Fulton County election officials knew the hand-count/audit results were falsely inflated. There are a confirmed 6,691 fictitious votes that were added to the hand-count/audit results, but were NEVER corrected. An email found corresponds, which is located in this report, establishes the fact that Fulton County election officials knew of the errors at the time, even the same day that the Secretary of State released the results. (PAGE 171 in the video report above contains the email to view.) For some five 5+ years, the hand-count/audit results, known by Fulton County to be materially defective, have been used to falsely substantiate the official results. The same fraudulent results have also been used against those who rightfully questioned Georgia's election results. Lastly, for just this report and presentation, the hand-count tally sheets DO NOT MATCH results from advance voting polling locations. Poll tapes were compared for all tabulators at each polling location to the corresponding batch tally sheets as produced during the hand-count/audit. The fact that such differences between the hand counted audited ballot tallies and the official machine count tallies differs by this much signals that tabulation and auditing processes are flawed and strongly argue for intense objective expert examination and considerable mitigation efforts. It should be the case that such counts are consistent and exact. The fact that such audit discrepancies at a precinct level did not cause precertification investigations of the count variances is unacceptable, it essentially defeats the purpose of an audit if significant discrepancies are ignored and chalked up to human error. As they seem to have been at least in the case of the Fulton County audit. It is irrefutable that the hand count/audit results were indeed the result of intentional human acts, aka, FRAUD. Read full report for all details and visual evidence above in video report. The 2020 Election was stolen.

2026 Fulton County Election Fraud Report finds THOUSANDS of FALSE BALLOTS added to the post-election hand count/audit, which lowered Biden's margin of victory and vote total by about 50,000 to 60,000 votes, indicating that Trump did indeed win Georgia in the 2020 election. This isn't even counting all of the other fraud found GA. As a result of the 36 errors, 6,691 fictitious ballots that do not exist were added to the "Total Ballots Cast" column. After removing the false ballots from the total, because they do not exist, Fulton County's corrected Total Ballots Cast for the hand count/audit is 521,341, or 7,436 ballots less than the certified Nov. 3rd total of 528,777. Of these, candidate Trump received 1,025 false votes that do not exist, while candidate Biden received 5,618 false votes that do not exist. Correcting for the errors from only the absentee ballots of one county, the hand count/audit results yield a margin of victory that is 4,593 votes less than the November 3rd results. 11,779 was the total margin of victory for the entire state. A review of only 3 percent of the ballots yielded errors that falsely inflated the margin of victory for the hand count/audit by one-third. Based on these errors alone, the margin of victory drops to 7,185. The 36 errors mysteriously added a sufficient number of ballots and votes to substantiate the November 3rd results, albeit falsely. Just as the hand count/audit was used as a metric to corroborate the November 3rd results, the errors call those results in to question. First, there was no investigation beyond that which was carried out by Mr. Rossi and the Governor's office as the Secretary of State's investigator did not perform an investigation. Second, the claim that the error were unintentional is refuted by the fact that 35 of the 36 inconsistencies benefited one candidate. Next, the failures were not the product of data entry errors. Lastly, the conclusion and excuse that the errors did not affect the outcome of the presidential contest is irrelevant and not responsive to the allegation, as the race for president extended past the Fulton County line, and so did the "errors" that were found. It gets even better... A total of eight 8 false batch entries are included in the results in which candidate Trump erroneously receives ZERO votes, and almost all are supported with a batch tally sheet. Errors with a batch tally sheet that don’t match the corresponding ballots are not the product of mistake or unintentional error. It is indisputable that the batch tally sheets identified by Mr. Rossi and Governor Kemp were intentionally fabricated to falsely pad the hand-count/audit results in line with the November 3rd results. Georgia law explicitly states that any superintendent or employee who intentionally destroys or alters tally papers, or permits them to be destroyed or altered, shall be guilty of a felony. Fulton County's chaotic, unaccountable curation and processing of cast ballots, cast BMD printout, and electronic records make a true risk-limiting audit impossible. It is unreasonable for voters to trust that their votes were counted at all, much less counted correctly. Voters have good reason to believe that some votes counted more than others, some votes were included twice or 3x in the totals. There is no way to know how many votes were omitted from the tabulation, absent access to the physical ballots and BMD printout and evidence that the chain of custody is intact. From the records produced so far, it Is impossible to determine whether malware, bugs, misconfiguration, or malfeasance disenfranchised voters or altered the election results. The fact that thousands of false ballots and votes were unveiled should have triggered a real investigation, not only of Fulton County's November 3rd election results, but those of the entire state. We can use the same mathematical basis as the Risk Limiting Audit by using Fulton County’s rate of error- and extrapolate. Approximately 148,000 absentee ballots were cast in Fulton County, and out of those, 6,691, 4.52%, were found to be false, or in error. A total of 1,311,061 absentee ballots were cast in the state of Georgia for the 2020 General Election. Using the same percentage, 4.52%, of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: 1,311,061 x .0452 = 59,259 false ballots/votes Using the same ratio of distribution of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: Candidate Biden: 83.9% of 59,259 = 49,718 false votes Candidate Trump: 15.3% of 59,259 = 9,066 false votes Therefore, using the Fulton County hand count/audit error rate, as established by the Governor's report on just the absentee ballots cast, the error rate is determinative, and it is possible that the wrong candidate did take office. Ms. McGowan's assertion that the hand count/audit errors did not affect the outcome of the race, is not supported by fact. Given the egregious manipulation in Fulton County, failing and/or refusing to check the hand count/audit results of the other 158 counties constitutes gross negligence, if not willful misconduct and fraud. On top of these findings, Fulton County election officials knew the hand-count/audit results were falsely inflated. There are a confirmed 6,691 fictitious votes that were added to the hand-count/audit results, but were NEVER corrected. An email found corresponds, which is located in this report, establishes the fact that Fulton County election officials knew of the errors at the time, even the same day that the Secretary of State released the results. (PAGE 171 in the video report above contains the email to view.) For some five 5+ years, the hand-count/audit results, known by Fulton County to be materially defective, have been used to falsely substantiate the official results. The same fraudulent results have also been used against those who rightfully questioned Georgia's election results. Lastly, for just this report and presentation, the hand-count tally sheets DO NOT MATCH results from advance voting polling locations. Poll tapes were compared for all tabulators at each polling location to the corresponding batch tally sheets as produced during the hand-count/audit. The fact that such differences between the hand counted audited ballot tallies and the official machine count tallies differs by this much signals that tabulation and auditing processes are flawed and strongly argue for intense objective expert examination and considerable mitigation efforts. It should be the case that such counts are consistent and exact. The fact that such audit discrepancies at a precinct level did not cause precertification investigations of the count variances is unacceptable, it essentially defeats the purpose of an audit if significant discrepancies are ignored and chalked up to human error. As they seem to have been at least in the case of the Fulton County audit. It is irrefutable that the hand count/audit results were indeed the result of intentional human acts, aka, FRAUD. Read full report for all details and visual evidence above in video report. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

46,148 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"He hacked the machine with a BALLPOINT PEN, right in front of the judge, twice." - Mike Lindell This video proves by a voting machine expert that anyone can gain FULL ADMIN ACCESS to the voting machines in under 2 min with NO TOOLS, but a simple, everyday, BALLPOINT PEN. Trying to prove voting machines were safe in a court of law ended up doing the exact opposite, turning the demonstration into a live procedure of their how to access the machines and their enormous vulnerability, in front of the judge, and the entire courtroom. Most of the evidence for the 2020 election was NEVER even looked at, just thrown out. Not only are these judges proceeding over these cases corrupt, but they are bought, blackmailed, and / or threatened. Our greatest enemy is from within and many of them sit on the bench in a court of law. They are compromised and MUST be removed.

"He hacked the machine with a BALLPOINT PEN, right in front of the judge, twice." - Mike Lindell This video proves by a voting machine expert that anyone can gain FULL ADMIN ACCESS to the voting machines in under 2 min with NO TOOLS, but a simple, everyday, BALLPOINT PEN. Trying to prove voting machines were safe in a court of law ended up doing the exact opposite, turning the demonstration into a live procedure of their how to access the machines and their enormous vulnerability, in front of the judge, and the entire courtroom. Most of the evidence for the 2020 election was NEVER even looked at, just thrown out. Not only are these judges proceeding over these cases corrupt, but they are bought, blackmailed, and / or threatened. Our greatest enemy is from within and many of them sit on the bench in a court of law. They are compromised and MUST be removed.

The SCIF

26,173 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

MILITARY whistleblower and election investigator expose an ENORMOUS amount of ELECTION FRAUD in the 2020 ELECTION in Fulton County, Georgia, which also involves the Georgia Secretary of State and the Georgia Attorney General. First, we'll start with the confirmed findings from the election investigator in Fulton County, Georgia: 58,924 votes on ballots have NO source justification. 17,852 ballots have NO original or recount ballot images. How is it possible that those votes would even get into the certified votes if there was no image to begin with? This is NO accident. Let's move on. 3,125 ballots were DOUBLE scanned and their votes were DOUBLE counted. 20,713 in-person votes are from ballots that had NO original tabulated text. Still unexplained and NO answer for. 17,235 certified votes were backfilled after the certification deadline into the election results, despite they have NO original scan logs. Retired Military whistleblower, Fulgham, filed a fraud report with CISA, the cybersecurity agency of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), concerning Fulton County, Georgia. The FBI was briefed on this report on 3 occasions that duplicate ballots were entered into the election INTENTIONALLY. The ballots were altered and then duplicated. Fulgham also reported that there were also 6,000 fake votes added to the Fulton County, Georgia, hand count. The Georgia Secretary of State mentioned the following admission that the Fulton hand count was off by several thousand because they scanned the ballots TWICE. Immediately after that, another hearing was held by the State Election Board and the investigators concealed the evidence from the board and the people. Fulgham then filed a SECOND fraud report, this one with the Georgia Attorney General, who also ended up burying the evidence. Now, Fulgham filed a complaint with the Office of the Inspector General that the investigators on the state side, the Georgia Secretary of State, and the Georgia Attorney General for mishandling and concealing evidence that the 2020 Election was STOLEN. Complaint # 71933C143F From: Fulgham The fraud itself is widespread and goes all the way to the top. The ones who who can do something about the fraud and file the criminal referrals ARE THE CRIMINALS THEMSELVES.

MILITARY whistleblower and election investigator expose an ENORMOUS amount of ELECTION FRAUD in the 2020 ELECTION in Fulton County, Georgia, which also involves the Georgia Secretary of State and the Georgia Attorney General. First, we'll start with the confirmed findings from the election investigator in Fulton County, Georgia: 58,924 votes on ballots have NO source justification. 17,852 ballots have NO original or recount ballot images. How is it possible that those votes would even get into the certified votes if there was no image to begin with? This is NO accident. Let's move on. 3,125 ballots were DOUBLE scanned and their votes were DOUBLE counted. 20,713 in-person votes are from ballots that had NO original tabulated text. Still unexplained and NO answer for. 17,235 certified votes were backfilled after the certification deadline into the election results, despite they have NO original scan logs. Retired Military whistleblower, Fulgham, filed a fraud report with CISA, the cybersecurity agency of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), concerning Fulton County, Georgia. The FBI was briefed on this report on 3 occasions that duplicate ballots were entered into the election INTENTIONALLY. The ballots were altered and then duplicated. Fulgham also reported that there were also 6,000 fake votes added to the Fulton County, Georgia, hand count. The Georgia Secretary of State mentioned the following admission that the Fulton hand count was off by several thousand because they scanned the ballots TWICE. Immediately after that, another hearing was held by the State Election Board and the investigators concealed the evidence from the board and the people. Fulgham then filed a SECOND fraud report, this one with the Georgia Attorney General, who also ended up burying the evidence. Now, Fulgham filed a complaint with the Office of the Inspector General that the investigators on the state side, the Georgia Secretary of State, and the Georgia Attorney General for mishandling and concealing evidence that the 2020 Election was STOLEN. Complaint # 71933C143F From: Fulgham The fraud itself is widespread and goes all the way to the top. The ones who who can do something about the fraud and file the criminal referrals ARE THE CRIMINALS THEMSELVES.

The SCIF

18,523 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#WATCH | Kolkata, West Bengal: Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav says, "I have just met Didi (Mamata Banerjee). Abhishek was also with me... Today, all of us, together, have to stand up to the election fraud. When the election happened honestly, she won, but this time, because of the multi-layered 'mafiagiri' that happened in the election, no one could have imagined that this kind of fraud could be done by the BJP, the Election Commission, their associates, the spies, and the underground people together, to do such elections..." He adds, "What the BJP has done in Uttar Pradesh—the election was a betrayal. It was a trial for them. And they learned from it and looted the entire election."

#WATCH | Kolkata, West Bengal: Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav says, "I have just met Didi (Mamata Banerjee). Abhishek was also with me... Today, all of us, together, have to stand up to the election fraud. When the election happened honestly, she won, but this time, because of the multi-layered 'mafiagiri' that happened in the election, no one could have imagined that this kind of fraud could be done by the BJP, the Election Commission, their associates, the spies, and the underground people together, to do such elections..." He adds, "What the BJP has done in Uttar Pradesh—the election was a betrayal. It was a trial for them. And they learned from it and looted the entire election."

ANI

199,136 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dominion Voting Machines can secretly alter your Ballot AFTER you've cast it. Princeton Prof. Andrew Appel exposes the jaw-dropping truth on the ImageCast Evolution machine. This "hybrid" beast scans your vote but has the sneaky power to print extra marks without you ever knowing. What's even more alarming is that they even programmed it to NOT fill in the bubble neatly so it would mimic a human being filling in a bubble not to rise suspicion and disguise the fact that a machine marked Ballot and not a human. This feature is available on Dominion voting machines, particularly models like the ImageCast Evolution (ICE) and ImageCast X (ICX), which have been used in various U.S. elections. The ICE can physically print additional votes onto a paper ballot after the voter inserts it for scanning and after they've reviewed it, if the machine is compromised by malware. This flaw stems from the machine's hybrid scanner/printer design, making it possible for hacked software to add or change votes undetected by the voter. Hackers could exploit security weaknesses in the machine or the connected election management system (EMS) to install malicious software. For the ICX, this includes an arbitrary-code-execution flaw that allows malware to propagate from the central EMS to all machines in a jurisdiction without needing physical access to each one. In models like the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) and ICE, a weak PRNG can reveal the order in which ballots were cast, potentially deanonymizing voters and linking ballots to individuals in scenarios where public ballot data is available. CISA identified nine vulnerabilities in certain ICX versions, including issues with authentication, encryption, and file validation. Exploiting these typically requires physical access to devices, EMS, or the ability to modify files before upload, but they could allow tampering if access is gained. In some configurations, like Georgia's ICX, attackers could alter QR codes on printed ballots to change encoded votes, though this would be detectable via risk-limiting audits (RLAs) since the human-readable text remains authoritative. Issues like those in Puerto Rico's 2024 primaries, where Dominion software produced lower or reversed vote totals compared to paper ballots, highlight potential for misconfigured systems to cause tabulation errors. The ICX includes extra Android apps, such as a terminal emulator providing root access, which could bypass controls and increase attack surfaces if exploited. This can also potentially make it able to be controlled remotely from anywhere. The truth is, all machines must go. Paper ballots and hand counts with massive oversight is the only safe way.

Dominion Voting Machines can secretly alter your Ballot AFTER you've cast it. Princeton Prof. Andrew Appel exposes the jaw-dropping truth on the ImageCast Evolution machine. This "hybrid" beast scans your vote but has the sneaky power to print extra marks without you ever knowing. What's even more alarming is that they even programmed it to NOT fill in the bubble neatly so it would mimic a human being filling in a bubble not to rise suspicion and disguise the fact that a machine marked Ballot and not a human. This feature is available on Dominion voting machines, particularly models like the ImageCast Evolution (ICE) and ImageCast X (ICX), which have been used in various U.S. elections. The ICE can physically print additional votes onto a paper ballot after the voter inserts it for scanning and after they've reviewed it, if the machine is compromised by malware. This flaw stems from the machine's hybrid scanner/printer design, making it possible for hacked software to add or change votes undetected by the voter. Hackers could exploit security weaknesses in the machine or the connected election management system (EMS) to install malicious software. For the ICX, this includes an arbitrary-code-execution flaw that allows malware to propagate from the central EMS to all machines in a jurisdiction without needing physical access to each one. In models like the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) and ICE, a weak PRNG can reveal the order in which ballots were cast, potentially deanonymizing voters and linking ballots to individuals in scenarios where public ballot data is available. CISA identified nine vulnerabilities in certain ICX versions, including issues with authentication, encryption, and file validation. Exploiting these typically requires physical access to devices, EMS, or the ability to modify files before upload, but they could allow tampering if access is gained. In some configurations, like Georgia's ICX, attackers could alter QR codes on printed ballots to change encoded votes, though this would be detectable via risk-limiting audits (RLAs) since the human-readable text remains authoritative. Issues like those in Puerto Rico's 2024 primaries, where Dominion software produced lower or reversed vote totals compared to paper ballots, highlight potential for misconfigured systems to cause tabulation errors. The ICX includes extra Android apps, such as a terminal emulator providing root access, which could bypass controls and increase attack surfaces if exploited. This can also potentially make it able to be controlled remotely from anywhere. The truth is, all machines must go. Paper ballots and hand counts with massive oversight is the only safe way.

The SCIF

39,311 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten