Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Prison hacks, jailhouse lighter 🔥 👀 Human ingenuity under extreme limits never stops being impressive. This short demonstration of a classic “jailhouse lighter” is a pure example of resourcefulness when almost every normal tool is off-limits. No fancy gear, no store-bought solution — just everyday scraps turned into something... functional through pure problem-solving. It’s a quiet reminder that necessity still forces the sharpest creativity. The same drive that invents these workarounds is the same one that has produced countless practical tools throughout history when people had to make do with almost nothing. Fascinating to watch. What’s the most inventive everyday hack you’ve ever seen born from real constraints?show more

Bobbi

114,164 subscribers

2,926,428 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Andrew Wilson very eloquently points out to Candace Owens that no one has ever had a problem with people questioning or having doubts surrounding the Tyler Robinson case. The problem is when people inject baseless outside conspiracy theories that are never subjected to the same level of scrutiny: “That’s never what the problem is. The problem is when you make claims outside of, ‘Well, wait a second, I’m just questioning evidence here. I’m just questioning what the state’s case is here. I’m just asking questions.’ It’s when you make claims outside of that. It’s when you claim that there’s good evidence or good standards you should believe. Because... and then it turns out that it’s all nonsense. Or it’s wackadoo stuff. And it makes no sense.” Which, of course goes over Candace's head.

Andrew Wilson very eloquently points out to Candace Owens that no one has ever had a problem with people questioning or having doubts surrounding the Tyler Robinson case. The problem is when people inject baseless outside conspiracy theories that are never subjected to the same level of scrutiny: “That’s never what the problem is. The problem is when you make claims outside of, ‘Well, wait a second, I’m just questioning evidence here. I’m just questioning what the state’s case is here. I’m just asking questions.’ It’s when you make claims outside of that. It’s when you claim that there’s good evidence or good standards you should believe. Because... and then it turns out that it’s all nonsense. Or it’s wackadoo stuff. And it makes no sense.” Which, of course goes over Candace's head.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

43,987 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

The smartest man at Bell Labs quietly turned math into a millionaire's fortune in the market. one of his tricks: make money off a stock that goes nowhere. up 40%, down 40%, flat on the year, and you still walk away richer. it survived in a grainy black-and-white MIT lecture from 1970. free ever since, and almost nobody plays something this old. the man at the board is Herb Gross, MIT, whose 1970 course taught more traders their own math than most finance degrees ever will. here is the part that pays. one rebalance earns almost nothing. a thousand earn a little. that is still just "many." take it to infinity and it turns into something else, a premium no single trade ever held. the wiggle stops being noise and becomes the return. no ticker. no forecast. one tiny gain, taken forever. the stock did nothing. the math did everything. it has been free since 1970, and almost no one learned the one idea that turns motion into money.

The smartest man at Bell Labs quietly turned math into a millionaire's fortune in the market. one of his tricks: make money off a stock that goes nowhere. up 40%, down 40%, flat on the year, and you still walk away richer. it survived in a grainy black-and-white MIT lecture from 1970. free ever since, and almost nobody plays something this old. the man at the board is Herb Gross, MIT, whose 1970 course taught more traders their own math than most finance degrees ever will. here is the part that pays. one rebalance earns almost nothing. a thousand earn a little. that is still just "many." take it to infinity and it turns into something else, a premium no single trade ever held. the wiggle stops being noise and becomes the return. no ticker. no forecast. one tiny gain, taken forever. the stock did nothing. the math did everything. it has been free since 1970, and almost no one learned the one idea that turns motion into money.

Loran

24,688 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Most people walk past a problem. A few people decide to solve it. There is something incredibly therapeutic about watching water find its way home, but there’s something even more powerful about the person who makes it happen. No camera crew, no big budget—just a man, a tool, and the will to keep his neighborhood from flooding. In a world full of noise, these are the quiet victories that actually matter. It’s not just about a clogged drain; it’s about the satisfying moment order is restored from the chaos. Watching that whirlpool form is pure dopamine, but knowing it saved a street is the real win. We need more of this energy in 2026.

Most people walk past a problem. A few people decide to solve it. There is something incredibly therapeutic about watching water find its way home, but there’s something even more powerful about the person who makes it happen. No camera crew, no big budget—just a man, a tool, and the will to keep his neighborhood from flooding. In a world full of noise, these are the quiet victories that actually matter. It’s not just about a clogged drain; it’s about the satisfying moment order is restored from the chaos. Watching that whirlpool form is pure dopamine, but knowing it saved a street is the real win. We need more of this energy in 2026.

PeachProof

59,456 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Larry Ellison just called AI the biggest thing in human history. He was being conservative. Ellison: “It is a much bigger deal than the industrial revolution, electricity, whatever. Everything that’s come before.” “Bigger” is the wrong word. “Bigger” assumes the same axis. A taller building on the same foundation. A faster car on the same road. This isn’t a taller building. This is a new dimension. Every revolution in human history extended the body. Steam replaced muscle. Electricity replaced fire. The combustion engine replaced the horse. Each one extraordinary. Each one civilization-altering. Each one built on an assumption nobody ever thought to question. That human cognition was the ceiling. A hammer builds nothing the carpenter can’t envision. A telescope reveals nothing the astronomer can’t interpret. A calculator solves nothing the mathematician can’t frame. 300,000 years of invention. Every tool a servant to the mind that forged it. AI ended that arrangement. Ellison: “We created neural networks that can answer questions that human brains would struggle with.” Not slower. Not less efficiently. Struggle with. We built something that thinks past the point where human thought stops. The tool is no longer bound by the toolmaker. Every ceiling humanity ever hit wasn’t physics. Wasn’t the universe setting limits. It was us. We were the boundary. And we just built something that doesn’t know it’s there. That’s not a bigger industrial revolution. That’s not even a revolution. That’s a species discovering it was the only thing standing between itself and everything it couldn’t yet imagine. And Ellison isn’t waiting for any of it. He’s already past AGI. Already framing superintelligence not as theory. As a scheduling problem. People hear that and reach for fear. Wrong instinct. Every prior revolution displaced labor. AI displaces limits. The industrial revolution didn’t make blacksmiths more creative. It made them irrelevant. AI inverts that. It doesn’t replace human cognition. It uncaps it. The kid with no teachers now has the most patient tutor ever built. The founder with no legal team now has one. The researcher at the edge of what one mind can hold now has a partner with no edge of its own. This isn’t automation. This is cognitive liberation. Every revolution before this answered a human question. This is the first one capable of asking its own. And we haven’t heard the first one yet.

Larry Ellison just called AI the biggest thing in human history. He was being conservative. Ellison: “It is a much bigger deal than the industrial revolution, electricity, whatever. Everything that’s come before.” “Bigger” is the wrong word. “Bigger” assumes the same axis. A taller building on the same foundation. A faster car on the same road. This isn’t a taller building. This is a new dimension. Every revolution in human history extended the body. Steam replaced muscle. Electricity replaced fire. The combustion engine replaced the horse. Each one extraordinary. Each one civilization-altering. Each one built on an assumption nobody ever thought to question. That human cognition was the ceiling. A hammer builds nothing the carpenter can’t envision. A telescope reveals nothing the astronomer can’t interpret. A calculator solves nothing the mathematician can’t frame. 300,000 years of invention. Every tool a servant to the mind that forged it. AI ended that arrangement. Ellison: “We created neural networks that can answer questions that human brains would struggle with.” Not slower. Not less efficiently. Struggle with. We built something that thinks past the point where human thought stops. The tool is no longer bound by the toolmaker. Every ceiling humanity ever hit wasn’t physics. Wasn’t the universe setting limits. It was us. We were the boundary. And we just built something that doesn’t know it’s there. That’s not a bigger industrial revolution. That’s not even a revolution. That’s a species discovering it was the only thing standing between itself and everything it couldn’t yet imagine. And Ellison isn’t waiting for any of it. He’s already past AGI. Already framing superintelligence not as theory. As a scheduling problem. People hear that and reach for fear. Wrong instinct. Every prior revolution displaced labor. AI displaces limits. The industrial revolution didn’t make blacksmiths more creative. It made them irrelevant. AI inverts that. It doesn’t replace human cognition. It uncaps it. The kid with no teachers now has the most patient tutor ever built. The founder with no legal team now has one. The researcher at the edge of what one mind can hold now has a partner with no edge of its own. This isn’t automation. This is cognitive liberation. Every revolution before this answered a human question. This is the first one capable of asking its own. And we haven’t heard the first one yet.

Dustin

14,765 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Jordan Peterson shared one of the most sobering statistics I’ve heard in a long time. The U.S. Armed Forces — after over a century of careful psychometric research driven by life-and-death necessity — will not induct anyone with an IQ below 83. They concluded that there is simply nothing in the military (at any level) that such a person can be trained to do without being counterproductive. Peterson noted that this threshold captures roughly one in ten people. And if the military’s complexity is even roughly comparable to broader society, that means about 10% of the population has no viable place in our cognitively demanding world. He emphasized that this isn’t about lack of money or short-term training. The data shows it’s extremely difficult to turn low cognitive ability into the kind of adaptive, creative problem-solving that modern society requires. It’s a raw, uncomfortable truth about human variation that most people prefer not to discuss openly. What do you think — is this statistic something society needs to confront honestly, or is there a better way to think about it?

Jordan Peterson shared one of the most sobering statistics I’ve heard in a long time. The U.S. Armed Forces — after over a century of careful psychometric research driven by life-and-death necessity — will not induct anyone with an IQ below 83. They concluded that there is simply nothing in the military (at any level) that such a person can be trained to do without being counterproductive. Peterson noted that this threshold captures roughly one in ten people. And if the military’s complexity is even roughly comparable to broader society, that means about 10% of the population has no viable place in our cognitively demanding world. He emphasized that this isn’t about lack of money or short-term training. The data shows it’s extremely difficult to turn low cognitive ability into the kind of adaptive, creative problem-solving that modern society requires. It’s a raw, uncomfortable truth about human variation that most people prefer not to discuss openly. What do you think — is this statistic something society needs to confront honestly, or is there a better way to think about it?

Camus

2,431,718 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

When Sesame Street Met the Galaxy… and Childhood Was NEVER the Same 🚀✨ The moment Big Bird met two of the most iconic droids in the universe—pure magic, pure nostalgia. 🌟 This legendary crossover brought together the warmth of Sesame Street and the wonder of space, creating a scene that generations still smile about. Whether you grew up with it or are discovering it now, this is one of those unforgettable TV moments that proves imagination has no limits. Be honest… did you ever expect Big Bird to hang out with robots from a galaxy far, far away? 🥹💛 #SesameStreet #BigBird #StarWars #C3PO #R2D2

When Sesame Street Met the Galaxy… and Childhood Was NEVER the Same 🚀✨ The moment Big Bird met two of the most iconic droids in the universe—pure magic, pure nostalgia. 🌟 This legendary crossover brought together the warmth of Sesame Street and the wonder of space, creating a scene that generations still smile about. Whether you grew up with it or are discovering it now, this is one of those unforgettable TV moments that proves imagination has no limits. Be honest… did you ever expect Big Bird to hang out with robots from a galaxy far, far away? 🥹💛 #SesameStreet #BigBird #StarWars #C3PO #R2D2

Retro Toys and Cartoons

18,760 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk just named the one problem humanity should never solve. Silicon Valley is pouring billions into curing death. They treat mortality like a software bug. Something to be patched out of the system before the next release. Musk and Peterson just laid out what actually happens if they succeed. Jordan Peterson: “If you eradicate death, it seems to me that on some fundamental level you also eradicate reality itself.” He is not being poetic. He is describing the load-bearing wall of human existence. Every act of courage this planet has ever witnessed was powered by one brutal fact. The person performing it knew they were running out of time. The limitation is not the enemy. The limitation is the engine. Musk: “Evolution has found that it’s better for organisms to have a finite life. Death brings renewal.” If the current generation never exits, the next one never enters. Culture stops moving. The same minds running the same thoughts with nothing forcing them to let go. Peterson: “Whatever we are as conscious beings is a hell of a lot deeper than the patterns of thought that make up our cortical existence.” The technologists look at a human being and see data. They believe consciousness is a pattern that can be copied to a server and run indefinitely. They want to remove the friction of a body that breaks down. They do not understand that the friction is the entire point. Apply the coldest law of economics to your own existence. When supply becomes infinite, value collapses to zero. An infinite number of tomorrows makes today mean nothing. Every painting ever made. Every desperate “I love you.” Every moment a person chose to stand when it would have been easier to quit. All of it exists because the clock was running. A consciousness with no expiration date is not a higher form of life. It is just an algorithm that has not been turned off yet.

Elon Musk just named the one problem humanity should never solve. Silicon Valley is pouring billions into curing death. They treat mortality like a software bug. Something to be patched out of the system before the next release. Musk and Peterson just laid out what actually happens if they succeed. Jordan Peterson: “If you eradicate death, it seems to me that on some fundamental level you also eradicate reality itself.” He is not being poetic. He is describing the load-bearing wall of human existence. Every act of courage this planet has ever witnessed was powered by one brutal fact. The person performing it knew they were running out of time. The limitation is not the enemy. The limitation is the engine. Musk: “Evolution has found that it’s better for organisms to have a finite life. Death brings renewal.” If the current generation never exits, the next one never enters. Culture stops moving. The same minds running the same thoughts with nothing forcing them to let go. Peterson: “Whatever we are as conscious beings is a hell of a lot deeper than the patterns of thought that make up our cortical existence.” The technologists look at a human being and see data. They believe consciousness is a pattern that can be copied to a server and run indefinitely. They want to remove the friction of a body that breaks down. They do not understand that the friction is the entire point. Apply the coldest law of economics to your own existence. When supply becomes infinite, value collapses to zero. An infinite number of tomorrows makes today mean nothing. Every painting ever made. Every desperate “I love you.” Every moment a person chose to stand when it would have been easier to quit. All of it exists because the clock was running. A consciousness with no expiration date is not a higher form of life. It is just an algorithm that has not been turned off yet.

Dustin

38,720 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Y’all, this isn’t just another “save money at the grocery store” video. This is the same spirit my mama lived by in the 70s and 80s when a trip to the store meant stretching every dollar and still putting real food on the table. We didn’t call it “life hacks.” We just called it knowing how to take what you already have and turn it into something better. Watching this guy take everyday kitchen staples and recreate store-bought products reminded me of those days: garlic that actually tastes like garlic instead of sitting in a dusty jar for months, things you can make in five minutes that last weeks, and the quiet satisfaction of knowing exactly what’s in it because you made it yourself. There’s something powerful about that kind of self-reliance. It’s not about being cheap. It’s about being capable. It’s about teaching the grandkids that you don’t have to buy everything in a pretty package. Sometimes the best version is the one you stir together in your own kitchen. If you’ve ever stood in the grocery aisle looking at the price of something simple and thought, “I could probably make this,” this is your permission slip. Start with one. See how it feels. Then try another. That’s the real substance here — not just saving a few dollars, but remembering we still have the skills our parents and grandparents used every single day.

Y’all, this isn’t just another “save money at the grocery store” video. This is the same spirit my mama lived by in the 70s and 80s when a trip to the store meant stretching every dollar and still putting real food on the table. We didn’t call it “life hacks.” We just called it knowing how to take what you already have and turn it into something better. Watching this guy take everyday kitchen staples and recreate store-bought products reminded me of those days: garlic that actually tastes like garlic instead of sitting in a dusty jar for months, things you can make in five minutes that last weeks, and the quiet satisfaction of knowing exactly what’s in it because you made it yourself. There’s something powerful about that kind of self-reliance. It’s not about being cheap. It’s about being capable. It’s about teaching the grandkids that you don’t have to buy everything in a pretty package. Sometimes the best version is the one you stir together in your own kitchen. If you’ve ever stood in the grocery aisle looking at the price of something simple and thought, “I could probably make this,” this is your permission slip. Start with one. See how it feels. Then try another. That’s the real substance here — not just saving a few dollars, but remembering we still have the skills our parents and grandparents used every single day.

NancyH

136,426 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

“A “dictatorship” that results in people living together in harmony when they never had, the same people who used to hate each other, who killed one another, who lived through a genocide like it happened here. The same people now come together, agree with each other and work together to develop their country. When they have an opportunity to choose, to elect the political leaders they want, you call it “dictatorship” because of our uniqueness, which has no resemblance to what you do. What I can tell you is that this uniqueness is also part of the history that Rwanda is writing. Nobody should tell you that [this uniqueness] is wrong, you should not accept it. There is no sin in it. It’s our uniqueness. It is a unity Rwandans never had before. It is our history changing from bad to good.” Chairman Kagame | RPF Presidential Campaign - Gasabo District. #ToraKagame24

“A “dictatorship” that results in people living together in harmony when they never had, the same people who used to hate each other, who killed one another, who lived through a genocide like it happened here. The same people now come together, agree with each other and work together to develop their country. When they have an opportunity to choose, to elect the political leaders they want, you call it “dictatorship” because of our uniqueness, which has no resemblance to what you do. What I can tell you is that this uniqueness is also part of the history that Rwanda is writing. Nobody should tell you that [this uniqueness] is wrong, you should not accept it. There is no sin in it. It’s our uniqueness. It is a unity Rwandans never had before. It is our history changing from bad to good.” Chairman Kagame | RPF Presidential Campaign - Gasabo District. #ToraKagame24

FPR-Inkotanyi

32,305 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Elon Musk is building something no platform in history has actually attempted. A system that judges ideas without knowing who wrote them. Musk: “It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers, and if that content is excellent, it gets seen by a lot of people.” Every platform before this ran on a single hidden variable. Identity. Not quality. Not originality. Not depth. Identity. Who you were determined what got seen. The architecture didn’t surface the best thinking. It surfaced the most established thinker. It chose pedigree over precision. Every single time. Musk is the first person with the infrastructure, the capital, and the sheer indifference to consensus required to strip that variable out. Grok reads everything. Every post from every account. Zero followers or ten million. No weighting for legacy. No deference to tenure. It measures one thing. Intrinsic excellence. The printing press created publishers. Radio created networks. Television created anchors. Social media created influencers. Every technology of liberation produced a new gatekeeper within one generation. Musk is betting AI is the first tool that can’t be captured. An algorithm with no concept of identity has no incumbency to protect. It just reads. And it surfaces what’s best. If that works, it doesn’t just change a platform. It exposes something about every system that came before it. Every trending page, every algorithm, every feed that claimed to surface quality was never measuring quality. It was measuring proximity to power and calling it merit. We never had meritocracy. We had hierarchy with better marketing. Musk is building the first real one. And the question it forces isn’t whether you can compete. It’s whether your work was ever actually good, or you were just early. Everyone wants meritocracy. Almost nobody has ever lived in one.

Elon Musk is building something no platform in history has actually attempted. A system that judges ideas without knowing who wrote them. Musk: “It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers, and if that content is excellent, it gets seen by a lot of people.” Every platform before this ran on a single hidden variable. Identity. Not quality. Not originality. Not depth. Identity. Who you were determined what got seen. The architecture didn’t surface the best thinking. It surfaced the most established thinker. It chose pedigree over precision. Every single time. Musk is the first person with the infrastructure, the capital, and the sheer indifference to consensus required to strip that variable out. Grok reads everything. Every post from every account. Zero followers or ten million. No weighting for legacy. No deference to tenure. It measures one thing. Intrinsic excellence. The printing press created publishers. Radio created networks. Television created anchors. Social media created influencers. Every technology of liberation produced a new gatekeeper within one generation. Musk is betting AI is the first tool that can’t be captured. An algorithm with no concept of identity has no incumbency to protect. It just reads. And it surfaces what’s best. If that works, it doesn’t just change a platform. It exposes something about every system that came before it. Every trending page, every algorithm, every feed that claimed to surface quality was never measuring quality. It was measuring proximity to power and calling it merit. We never had meritocracy. We had hierarchy with better marketing. Musk is building the first real one. And the question it forces isn’t whether you can compete. It’s whether your work was ever actually good, or you were just early. Everyone wants meritocracy. Almost nobody has ever lived in one.

Dustin

29,704 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dwyane Wade says Russell Westbrook has one of the most underappreciated careers of all-time: “Man Russ is having one of the most underappreciated careers that we will see…for whatever the reasons are…just one of the GOAT careers because it’s customized and no one has one like it — like no one has a career like Russell Westbrook and no one plays the game like Russell Westbrook. He’s a 1 of 1… whatever year he’s in — he’s still athletic, he still plays the game the same way when we first got introduced to Russ and it’s incredible to watch — one of the most athletic human beings we’ve ever seen.” (via Wy Network by Dwyane Wade)

Dwyane Wade says Russell Westbrook has one of the most underappreciated careers of all-time: “Man Russ is having one of the most underappreciated careers that we will see…for whatever the reasons are…just one of the GOAT careers because it’s customized and no one has one like it — like no one has a career like Russell Westbrook and no one plays the game like Russell Westbrook. He’s a 1 of 1… whatever year he’s in — he’s still athletic, he still plays the game the same way when we first got introduced to Russ and it’s incredible to watch — one of the most athletic human beings we’ve ever seen.” (via Wy Network by Dwyane Wade)

The HEAT Realm

56,122 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.

Santiago

13,727 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🎬Mel Brooks never needed subtlety when a perfect line would do. 😂😂😂 In History of the World, Part I, Dom DeLuise as Caesar is carried through the streets while a servant dutifully whispers the traditional reminder: “Remember, thou art mortal.” Caesar’s response is pure Brooks: “Blow it out your ass!” The delivery, the timing, the complete lack of reverence for history or dignity — it’s one of those moments that still lands the same every time. DeLuise commits so hard that the whole procession feels like it might tip over from pure ego. Madeline Kahn’s reaction in the crowd only makes it better. Brooks specialized in taking the grandest, most self-important moments in history and poking them until they popped. This scene is textbook. What’s your favorite Mel Brooks one-liner that still makes you laugh out loud?

🎬Mel Brooks never needed subtlety when a perfect line would do. 😂😂😂 In History of the World, Part I, Dom DeLuise as Caesar is carried through the streets while a servant dutifully whispers the traditional reminder: “Remember, thou art mortal.” Caesar’s response is pure Brooks: “Blow it out your ass!” The delivery, the timing, the complete lack of reverence for history or dignity — it’s one of those moments that still lands the same every time. DeLuise commits so hard that the whole procession feels like it might tip over from pure ego. Madeline Kahn’s reaction in the crowd only makes it better. Brooks specialized in taking the grandest, most self-important moments in history and poking them until they popped. This scene is textbook. What’s your favorite Mel Brooks one-liner that still makes you laugh out loud?

BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸

22,040 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Every major turning point in human history had a moment where the people closest to it understood what was coming and everyone else didn’t. The printing press. The atomic bomb. The internet. Dario Amodei is trying to close that gap. Most people still aren’t listening. Amodei: “My fundamental view is that AI has been on an exponential for the last ten years and as part of a sort of Moore’s law for intelligence.” Not a metaphor. A measured curve. Not slowing. Accelerating. We are “well advanced on that curve” with a “small number of years” remaining before AI surpasses human cognitive capability across most things. Amodei: “We’re increasingly close to what I’ve called a country of geniuses in a data center.” Not one system. A coordinated set of AI agents, each more capable than most humans at most things, running in parallel, never sleeping, never losing focus, coordinating at speeds no biological intelligence can match. The ceiling on human progress has always been simple. Genius is rare and time is finite. That constraint is gone. We are not approaching the ceiling of intelligence. We are approaching the ceiling of intelligence that biology can produce. Those are not the same ceiling. The human brain is constrained by evolution, energy, skull size, and lifespan. AI has none of those limits. We have no framework for what intelligence looks like when you remove every biological constraint that shaped ours. Every tool we use to comprehend it is built from a mind it will surpass. Amodei: “AI models surpassing the cognitive capabilities of most humans for most things.” The upsides are “absolutely staggering.” So are the consequences. Displacement. Misuse. A period of disruption that reshapes how most people work, earn, and find purpose before the benefits reach them. The same exponential that produces the cures produces the chaos. They arrive together. That’s the optimistic read. The other read is this. We are building it without international standards in place. Racing to deploy before solving displacement or misuse. And once it’s operating beyond our ability to fully comprehend or follow, managing the disruption stops being something we do. It becomes something we experience while hoping the intelligence we created decides keeping us around still serves its objectives. Every turning point in history looks inevitable in hindsight. The people inside the moment never saw it that cleanly. We’re inside the moment.

Every major turning point in human history had a moment where the people closest to it understood what was coming and everyone else didn’t. The printing press. The atomic bomb. The internet. Dario Amodei is trying to close that gap. Most people still aren’t listening. Amodei: “My fundamental view is that AI has been on an exponential for the last ten years and as part of a sort of Moore’s law for intelligence.” Not a metaphor. A measured curve. Not slowing. Accelerating. We are “well advanced on that curve” with a “small number of years” remaining before AI surpasses human cognitive capability across most things. Amodei: “We’re increasingly close to what I’ve called a country of geniuses in a data center.” Not one system. A coordinated set of AI agents, each more capable than most humans at most things, running in parallel, never sleeping, never losing focus, coordinating at speeds no biological intelligence can match. The ceiling on human progress has always been simple. Genius is rare and time is finite. That constraint is gone. We are not approaching the ceiling of intelligence. We are approaching the ceiling of intelligence that biology can produce. Those are not the same ceiling. The human brain is constrained by evolution, energy, skull size, and lifespan. AI has none of those limits. We have no framework for what intelligence looks like when you remove every biological constraint that shaped ours. Every tool we use to comprehend it is built from a mind it will surpass. Amodei: “AI models surpassing the cognitive capabilities of most humans for most things.” The upsides are “absolutely staggering.” So are the consequences. Displacement. Misuse. A period of disruption that reshapes how most people work, earn, and find purpose before the benefits reach them. The same exponential that produces the cures produces the chaos. They arrive together. That’s the optimistic read. The other read is this. We are building it without international standards in place. Racing to deploy before solving displacement or misuse. And once it’s operating beyond our ability to fully comprehend or follow, managing the disruption stops being something we do. It becomes something we experience while hoping the intelligence we created decides keeping us around still serves its objectives. Every turning point in history looks inevitable in hindsight. The people inside the moment never saw it that cleanly. We’re inside the moment.

Dustin

47,215 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Nicole Shanahan, in 21 seconds of pure, unfiltered honesty: “I was wrong to ever trust these people… A lot of Democrats are now openly admitting they were misled, lied to, and caught in a constant bait-and-switch. No one in their right mind can keep supporting that.” This isn’t left vs right. This is that quiet, private moment we’ve all had — when something you once believed in suddenly stops making sense. If you’ve ever felt that little crack in the foundation… where trust turns into “wait… what?” …this clip is going to land differently. Watch all 21 seconds. No need to comment, no need to explain. Just know you’re not the only one who’s been there. Sometimes silence in the replies says more than words ever could.

Nicole Shanahan, in 21 seconds of pure, unfiltered honesty: “I was wrong to ever trust these people… A lot of Democrats are now openly admitting they were misled, lied to, and caught in a constant bait-and-switch. No one in their right mind can keep supporting that.” This isn’t left vs right. This is that quiet, private moment we’ve all had — when something you once believed in suddenly stops making sense. If you’ve ever felt that little crack in the foundation… where trust turns into “wait… what?” …this clip is going to land differently. Watch all 21 seconds. No need to comment, no need to explain. Just know you’re not the only one who’s been there. Sometimes silence in the replies says more than words ever could.

Camus

111,367 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Conan sold the “we accidentally double-booked them” apology just long enough for people to almost believe it. Then Jon Dore and Rory Scovel started performing their entire sets at the exact same time. The timing is insane. One goes loud while the other drops volume. Random punchlines keep cutting clean through the chaos. Halfway through they escalate with a guitar and an audience member at the perfect moment. Four minutes of pure controlled madness that still feels fresh over a decade later. This is still one of the smartest late night bits ever done. Never seen chaos this fun

Conan sold the “we accidentally double-booked them” apology just long enough for people to almost believe it. Then Jon Dore and Rory Scovel started performing their entire sets at the exact same time. The timing is insane. One goes loud while the other drops volume. Random punchlines keep cutting clean through the chaos. Halfway through they escalate with a guitar and an audience member at the perfect moment. Four minutes of pure controlled madness that still feels fresh over a decade later. This is still one of the smartest late night bits ever done. Never seen chaos this fun

Dope thrills

1,015,324 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

David Jerison, the mathematician who spent decades teaching the exact method for finding the optimal choice when the odds are stacked against you: "I used to think the best decision was whichever option looked strongest at first glance. Then I proved that the real answer almost always hides at a point nobody would guess just by looking, and checking only the obvious choices gets you the worst possible outcome, not the best." this is the exact method quant desks lean on to find the one allocation that survives every constraint thrown at it, and it's been sitting free in a public MIT lecture for almost twenty years. strip away the notation and the mechanism is simple. every optimization problem has a handful of candidate points where the best or worst answer could be hiding, and the obvious middle-of-the-road guess is almost never one of them. check only the points that feel natural, and you don't just miss the best answer. you can land on the exact opposite, the worst possible one, without ever realizing it. nobody presenting a "risk-optimized" portfolio out loud admits how easy it is to stop checking one step too early. zoom out to how this plays out sizing a position or allocating risk under real constraints today. the instinct is to test the option that feels balanced and call it done, when the actual edge is almost always sitting at an extreme nobody thought to check. the industry sells a clean, confident number as proof an allocation is optimal. but that number means nothing until every boundary has been checked, because the same method that finds the best case can just as easily hand you the worst one in disguise. the right answer was never the one that looked most reasonable. it was the one nobody bothered to check.

David Jerison, the mathematician who spent decades teaching the exact method for finding the optimal choice when the odds are stacked against you: "I used to think the best decision was whichever option looked strongest at first glance. Then I proved that the real answer almost always hides at a point nobody would guess just by looking, and checking only the obvious choices gets you the worst possible outcome, not the best." this is the exact method quant desks lean on to find the one allocation that survives every constraint thrown at it, and it's been sitting free in a public MIT lecture for almost twenty years. strip away the notation and the mechanism is simple. every optimization problem has a handful of candidate points where the best or worst answer could be hiding, and the obvious middle-of-the-road guess is almost never one of them. check only the points that feel natural, and you don't just miss the best answer. you can land on the exact opposite, the worst possible one, without ever realizing it. nobody presenting a "risk-optimized" portfolio out loud admits how easy it is to stop checking one step too early. zoom out to how this plays out sizing a position or allocating risk under real constraints today. the instinct is to test the option that feels balanced and call it done, when the actual edge is almost always sitting at an extreme nobody thought to check. the industry sells a clean, confident number as proof an allocation is optimal. but that number means nothing until every boundary has been checked, because the same method that finds the best case can just as easily hand you the worst one in disguise. the right answer was never the one that looked most reasonable. it was the one nobody bothered to check.

MindArch

16,232 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

“The average person lives a life of luxury that previous generations could never imagine, but because of that we dont actually taste this deeper joy that I think God intends for us.” Most people today live with a level of comfort that would have looked unbelievable to almost anyone in history. Food is always available, entertainment never stops, boredom can be eliminated instantly, and almost every inconvenience can be solved with a screen and a few clicks. That’s why so many people today have everything they thought they wanted and still feel empty afterward. The strange paradox of modern life is that we have removed many of the hardships that once burdened humanity, but in the process we also removed many of the conditions that produced gratitude, resilience, depth, and dependence on God. A civilization drowning in comfort often becomes spiritually numb without even realizing it. Which is probably why some of the holiest people in history voluntarily embraced hardship even when they did not have to. They understood something we are slowly forgetting: Comfort and happiness are not the same thing.

“The average person lives a life of luxury that previous generations could never imagine, but because of that we dont actually taste this deeper joy that I think God intends for us.” Most people today live with a level of comfort that would have looked unbelievable to almost anyone in history. Food is always available, entertainment never stops, boredom can be eliminated instantly, and almost every inconvenience can be solved with a screen and a few clicks. That’s why so many people today have everything they thought they wanted and still feel empty afterward. The strange paradox of modern life is that we have removed many of the hardships that once burdened humanity, but in the process we also removed many of the conditions that produced gratitude, resilience, depth, and dependence on God. A civilization drowning in comfort often becomes spiritually numb without even realizing it. Which is probably why some of the holiest people in history voluntarily embraced hardship even when they did not have to. They understood something we are slowly forgetting: Comfort and happiness are not the same thing.

Athenaeum Book Club

64,373 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The crowds that were making Tawaf suddenly form rows of prayer. Thousands of people from different countries, languages, and backgrounds stand shoulder to shoulder facing the Kabah. When the call to prayer echoes through the Haram, something powerful happens. The constant movement of pilgrims pauses, and the entire Masjid transforms into one unified congregation. It’s a reminder of one of the most beautiful realities of Islam: no matter where we come from, we all stand in the same direction, worshipping the same Lord. Millions visit the Haram every year, but moments like this remind us that the purpose of the journey, is simple to stand before Allah with humility, devotion, and unity.

The crowds that were making Tawaf suddenly form rows of prayer. Thousands of people from different countries, languages, and backgrounds stand shoulder to shoulder facing the Kabah. When the call to prayer echoes through the Haram, something powerful happens. The constant movement of pilgrims pauses, and the entire Masjid transforms into one unified congregation. It’s a reminder of one of the most beautiful realities of Islam: no matter where we come from, we all stand in the same direction, worshipping the same Lord. Millions visit the Haram every year, but moments like this remind us that the purpose of the journey, is simple to stand before Allah with humility, devotion, and unity.

Cool_Ustaaz ☪

12,044 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten