Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Private Group Only 50k Get 9 Private Group (Sekali Join Member Permanen) mantap terbukti, pakai 2 mingguan perubahan sangat cepat nambah gede dan panjang,, memuaskan hasilnya Penambah UK Penis 5-10 CM

KikiHandaysove's profile picture

Kiki Handayani

6,854 subscribers

38,711 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Private Group Only 50k Get 9 Private Group (Sekali Join Member Permanen) mantap terbukti, pakai 2 mingguan perubahan sangat cepat nambah gede dan panjang,, memuaskan hasilnya Penambah UK Penis 5-10 CM
0:36

Private Group Only 50k Get 9 Private Group (Sekali Join Member Permanen) mantap terbukti, pakai 2 mingguan perubahan sangat cepat nambah gede dan panjang,, memuaskan hasilnya Penambah UK Penis 5-10 CM

Kiki Handayani

24,353 次观看 • 1 个月前

Private Group Only 50k Get 9 Private Group (Sekali Join Member Permanen) mantap terbukti, pakai 2 mingguan perubahan sangat cepat nambah gede dan panjang,, memuaskan hasilnya Penambah UK Penis 5-10 CM
0:44

Private Group Only 50k Get 9 Private Group (Sekali Join Member Permanen) mantap terbukti, pakai 2 mingguan perubahan sangat cepat nambah gede dan panjang,, memuaskan hasilnya Penambah UK Penis 5-10 CM

Kiki Handayani

25,360 次观看 • 1 个月前

You’ve built something very valuable for a private equity group to acquire. You’ve either started a company from scratch or acquired one; you then operated and scaled it. After 5-10+ years, you sold a majority to a PE firm (cash and rolled minority equity); then several more years later you receive the “second bite of the apple”, larger than the first cash payment. A major liquidity and wealth milestone for you and your family, maybe beyond your dreams. But here’s the question no one asks: Now that you have wealth…how do you keep it? Two scenarios: A gentleman sold his construction company for $20 million. Within a year, half was gone. He had “diversified” into venture capital, luxury condos, and private crypto funds. He was chasing shiny objects. Contrast that with another entrepreneur who sold his HVAC business for the same amount. He put 60% into municipal bonds and short-term Treasuries, then took his time deciding what to do with the rest. The lesson: You don’t need to swing hard after you’ve already hit the home run. Build the wealth, then preserve and compound for today, tomorrow and future generations. In this episode, I break down the two-bucket philosophy: - Capital Preservation - Balanced and Compounded Growth I hope it gets you thinking about how to preserve and compound your wealth...starting today. Timestamps: 0:00 The hidden question after success: what do you do with the money? 1:30 Builders vs. stewards: different skill sets, same discipline 2:00 How legacy families preserve wealth for generations 2:30 "From rice field to rice field" 4:00 The simple fundamentals wealthy families follow 4:20 Why complexity sells, but simplicity endures 5:45 The two-bucket philosophy: preservation and compounding 6:01 Pillar #1: Conservative fixed income (your stability base) 6:40 Story: The entrepreneur who lost half his fortune chasing returns 7:22 Sponsor: CapitalBad - the marketplace for long-term investors 8:16 Pillar #2: High income strategy (living off cash flow) 9:12 Example: The Midwestern family that compounds quietly 9:15 Pillar #3: Long-term growth (own great companies for decades) 10:05 Compounding only works if you let it 10:59 Consumption vs. compounding: every generation’s choice 11:45 Structure, simplicity, and temperament in wealth management 12:00 Can you manage yourself as well as you managed your company?
13:15

You’ve built something very valuable for a private equity group to acquire. You’ve either started a company from scratch or acquired one; you then operated and scaled it. After 5-10+ years, you sold a majority to a PE firm (cash and rolled minority equity); then several more years later you receive the “second bite of the apple”, larger than the first cash payment. A major liquidity and wealth milestone for you and your family, maybe beyond your dreams. But here’s the question no one asks: Now that you have wealth…how do you keep it? Two scenarios: A gentleman sold his construction company for $20 million. Within a year, half was gone. He had “diversified” into venture capital, luxury condos, and private crypto funds. He was chasing shiny objects. Contrast that with another entrepreneur who sold his HVAC business for the same amount. He put 60% into municipal bonds and short-term Treasuries, then took his time deciding what to do with the rest. The lesson: You don’t need to swing hard after you’ve already hit the home run. Build the wealth, then preserve and compound for today, tomorrow and future generations. In this episode, I break down the two-bucket philosophy: - Capital Preservation - Balanced and Compounded Growth I hope it gets you thinking about how to preserve and compound your wealth...starting today. Timestamps: 0:00 The hidden question after success: what do you do with the money? 1:30 Builders vs. stewards: different skill sets, same discipline 2:00 How legacy families preserve wealth for generations 2:30 "From rice field to rice field" 4:00 The simple fundamentals wealthy families follow 4:20 Why complexity sells, but simplicity endures 5:45 The two-bucket philosophy: preservation and compounding 6:01 Pillar #1: Conservative fixed income (your stability base) 6:40 Story: The entrepreneur who lost half his fortune chasing returns 7:22 Sponsor: CapitalBad - the marketplace for long-term investors 8:16 Pillar #2: High income strategy (living off cash flow) 9:12 Example: The Midwestern family that compounds quietly 9:15 Pillar #3: Long-term growth (own great companies for decades) 10:05 Compounding only works if you let it 10:59 Consumption vs. compounding: every generation’s choice 11:45 Structure, simplicity, and temperament in wealth management 12:00 Can you manage yourself as well as you managed your company?

PrivateEquityGuy (Mikk Markus)

38,035 次观看 • 10 个月前

We're watching a financial crisis unfold in real time. The last time funds started blocking investors from getting their money back, Bear Stearns collapsed six months later. In 2007, BNP Paribas froze €1.6 billion in funds. Bear Stearns declared 2 funds "essentially worthless" and gated a third. Everyone said it was "contained." 6 months later the entire financial system nearly went under. I'm not saying we're there YET... But I am saying the pattern is rhyming. BlackRock just capped withdrawals from its $26 billion HPS Corporate Lending Fund after investors demanded 9.3% of their shares back - nearly DOUBLE the fund's 5% quarterly limit. Investors wanted $1.2 billion out. BlackRock gave them $620 million and said no to the rest. BlackRock stock dropped 7%. KKR, Ares, Apollo, Blue Owl - all down 5-6% on the same day. The financial sector ETF is off 9% in a month. This is the same BlackRock that just slashed a $25 million private credit loan from 100 to ZERO in 3 months. Full value one quarter. Worthless the next. And they'd already done the exact same thing months earlier with Renovo Home Partners. But this isn't just a BlackRock problem. Look at the dominoes: Last summer, Tricolor and First Brands went unexpectedly bankrupt. $10-15 billion in combined liabilities. Write-offs hit JPMorgan, UBS, and Jefferies. Then a UK lender called Market Financial Solutions collapsed with a £2.4 billion loan book. Fraud allegations. Double-pledged collateral. Barclays exposed for £500 million. Apollo, Elliott, Santander - all caught in the wreckage. Then Blue Owl permanently halted redemptions. Stock cut in HALF. Then Blackstone's $82 billion flagship fund got hit with $3.8 billion in redemption requests. They had to pump in $400 million of their own money just to meet demands. Now BlackRock is literally blocking the exits. Even Apollo's own CEO warned a shakeout is coming. When EVERYONE at the top is waving red flags - pay attention. UBS raised its worst-case default forecast to 15%. Defaults sit at 3-5% today. The trajectory is ugly. Here's the structural problem: After 2008, regulations pushed risky lending OUT of banks and INTO private credit. The sector ballooned to $3 trillion. But these funds make 5-7 year loans while promising investors quarterly liquidity. That works until everyone wants out at once. Which is exactly what's happening. 40% of sponsor-backed loans are tied to the software industry - the same sector AI is threatening to destroy. The Fed pumped 40% more money into the system after Covid and kept rates at zero. That easy money funded garbage underwriting. And now there's a $162 billion maturity wall hitting THIS YEAR. I've been warning about private credit for weeks. The story is always the same: Opaque valuations. Illiquid assets. Limited transparency. And the false promise of steady returns with no volatility. The whole sales pitch was equity-like returns with bond-like stability. But you can't eliminate volatility - you can only HIDE it... Until you can't. When the WORLD'S LARGEST ASSET MANAGER starts blocking investors from getting their money back, that's not "noise". That's an alarm. Get out before the exit gets more crowded.
1:56

We're watching a financial crisis unfold in real time. The last time funds started blocking investors from getting their money back, Bear Stearns collapsed six months later. In 2007, BNP Paribas froze €1.6 billion in funds. Bear Stearns declared 2 funds "essentially worthless" and gated a third. Everyone said it was "contained." 6 months later the entire financial system nearly went under. I'm not saying we're there YET... But I am saying the pattern is rhyming. BlackRock just capped withdrawals from its $26 billion HPS Corporate Lending Fund after investors demanded 9.3% of their shares back - nearly DOUBLE the fund's 5% quarterly limit. Investors wanted $1.2 billion out. BlackRock gave them $620 million and said no to the rest. BlackRock stock dropped 7%. KKR, Ares, Apollo, Blue Owl - all down 5-6% on the same day. The financial sector ETF is off 9% in a month. This is the same BlackRock that just slashed a $25 million private credit loan from 100 to ZERO in 3 months. Full value one quarter. Worthless the next. And they'd already done the exact same thing months earlier with Renovo Home Partners. But this isn't just a BlackRock problem. Look at the dominoes: Last summer, Tricolor and First Brands went unexpectedly bankrupt. $10-15 billion in combined liabilities. Write-offs hit JPMorgan, UBS, and Jefferies. Then a UK lender called Market Financial Solutions collapsed with a £2.4 billion loan book. Fraud allegations. Double-pledged collateral. Barclays exposed for £500 million. Apollo, Elliott, Santander - all caught in the wreckage. Then Blue Owl permanently halted redemptions. Stock cut in HALF. Then Blackstone's $82 billion flagship fund got hit with $3.8 billion in redemption requests. They had to pump in $400 million of their own money just to meet demands. Now BlackRock is literally blocking the exits. Even Apollo's own CEO warned a shakeout is coming. When EVERYONE at the top is waving red flags - pay attention. UBS raised its worst-case default forecast to 15%. Defaults sit at 3-5% today. The trajectory is ugly. Here's the structural problem: After 2008, regulations pushed risky lending OUT of banks and INTO private credit. The sector ballooned to $3 trillion. But these funds make 5-7 year loans while promising investors quarterly liquidity. That works until everyone wants out at once. Which is exactly what's happening. 40% of sponsor-backed loans are tied to the software industry - the same sector AI is threatening to destroy. The Fed pumped 40% more money into the system after Covid and kept rates at zero. That easy money funded garbage underwriting. And now there's a $162 billion maturity wall hitting THIS YEAR. I've been warning about private credit for weeks. The story is always the same: Opaque valuations. Illiquid assets. Limited transparency. And the false promise of steady returns with no volatility. The whole sales pitch was equity-like returns with bond-like stability. But you can't eliminate volatility - you can only HIDE it... Until you can't. When the WORLD'S LARGEST ASSET MANAGER starts blocking investors from getting their money back, that's not "noise". That's an alarm. Get out before the exit gets more crowded.

George Noble

1,230,680 次观看 • 5 个月前

⚠️Read this so you don't get scammed by a "New Holder"⚠️ On average, scammers spend ~43 days becoming your friend and building trust before attempting their first social-engineering scam. There are scammers impersonating BAYC, Pudgy, etc. as "new community members", but their whole goal is to drain your wallet. How are they doing this? They make a post pretending to purchase a new BAYC or Pudgy to gain "Mutual Followers", seem more legitimate, and ask to be added to "holders only" X chats. OR They purchase cheaper assets, like MAYC or Lil Pudgy, to seem even more legitimate because they can afford the investment to scam. How do I identify the scammers? - Their account is mostly RTs, plus a few posts, with the most recent being about them "joining the community". - The only posts they make are attempts to get recognition from the community they are targeting, such as "Follow for Follow". - Sadly, mutual followers are no longer a good way to judge credibility, but having no mutuals is still a big red flag. - Check the blockchain. Find the actual PFP they claim to own and see whether it was really purchased. 9/10 times it has not moved in months. This is what Welcome Apes 🍌 does an excellent job of doing to protect the community through due diligence. Scammers typically try to social engineer you in 3 ways: 1.) They DM you saying they like your Ape or Penguin and ask if you are interested in trading + ETH. Do not ever do this. There are no trading websites, and OpenSea is currently the only trusted platform. 2.) They use a group of 5 X accounts they control, put them into a group, and claim they are all minting a "Hype" project. This creates the illusion that multiple community members are excited, but it is 1 scammer with 5 fake accounts. 3.) They create a sob story to manipulate your emotions, then ask you to donate, lend money, or otherwise send them funds. All of this typically results in them rugging the scam project or draining your wallet!! What's the easiest way to check if someone is a scammer? Beyond the checks above, the easiest way is to do exactly what the video on this post shows. Go to the profile and click their join date. This shows where the profile is located and when it got verified. If the account is from pre-2020 but only recently got verified, that is a red flag. Most importantly, it shows how many times the account has changed its handle. Most scammers have more than 3 name changes in a month. That alone should put your guard up immediately, and you should distance yourself from the scammer. Not sure? Message me. I am always happy to help. We have to protect this community and keep scammers out. Stay Safe and Stay Vigilant
0:23

⚠️Read this so you don't get scammed by a "New Holder"⚠️ On average, scammers spend ~43 days becoming your friend and building trust before attempting their first social-engineering scam. There are scammers impersonating BAYC, Pudgy, etc. as "new community members", but their whole goal is to drain your wallet. How are they doing this? They make a post pretending to purchase a new BAYC or Pudgy to gain "Mutual Followers", seem more legitimate, and ask to be added to "holders only" X chats. OR They purchase cheaper assets, like MAYC or Lil Pudgy, to seem even more legitimate because they can afford the investment to scam. How do I identify the scammers? - Their account is mostly RTs, plus a few posts, with the most recent being about them "joining the community". - The only posts they make are attempts to get recognition from the community they are targeting, such as "Follow for Follow". - Sadly, mutual followers are no longer a good way to judge credibility, but having no mutuals is still a big red flag. - Check the blockchain. Find the actual PFP they claim to own and see whether it was really purchased. 9/10 times it has not moved in months. This is what Welcome Apes 🍌 does an excellent job of doing to protect the community through due diligence. Scammers typically try to social engineer you in 3 ways: 1.) They DM you saying they like your Ape or Penguin and ask if you are interested in trading + ETH. Do not ever do this. There are no trading websites, and OpenSea is currently the only trusted platform. 2.) They use a group of 5 X accounts they control, put them into a group, and claim they are all minting a "Hype" project. This creates the illusion that multiple community members are excited, but it is 1 scammer with 5 fake accounts. 3.) They create a sob story to manipulate your emotions, then ask you to donate, lend money, or otherwise send them funds. All of this typically results in them rugging the scam project or draining your wallet!! What's the easiest way to check if someone is a scammer? Beyond the checks above, the easiest way is to do exactly what the video on this post shows. Go to the profile and click their join date. This shows where the profile is located and when it got verified. If the account is from pre-2020 but only recently got verified, that is a red flag. Most importantly, it shows how many times the account has changed its handle. Most scammers have more than 3 name changes in a month. That alone should put your guard up immediately, and you should distance yourself from the scammer. Not sure? Message me. I am always happy to help. We have to protect this community and keep scammers out. Stay Safe and Stay Vigilant

NFT_Dreww.eth

13,850 次观看 • 5 个月前

Real Benefits of Staying Overnight at Accor’s Mercure Ba Na Hills 🏰☁️ Save Time • Save Money • Experience the REAL Ba Na Hills If Ba Na Hills, Vietnam 🇻🇳 is on your itinerary, do NOT do it as a day trip. An overnight stay at Mercure Ba Na Hills French Village completely changes the experience — and most people miss this 👇 ⸻ 🚡 World’s most unique hotel access — arrive by cable car with luggage This is the ONLY hotel where you reach your hotel room via cable car — with your luggage 🎒🧳 Your stay literally starts with a scenic cable car journey over the lush green forest, waterfalls and through the clouds ☁️ No roads. No buses. Just views and vibes. ⸻ ✨ Ba Na Hills at night = pure magic After sunset 🌄, it feels like you’re staying above the clouds ☁️ Silent streets, misty castles, and unreal vibes — something day visitors never see. 🚶‍♂️ Post 4:30 PM = Ba Na Hills becomes yours Once the day crowd leaves: • Empty streets • Quiet castles • Peaceful photo spots 📸 • Zero chaos ⸻ 🚡 VIP Cable Car access (Huge hidden benefit!) ✔️ Mercure guests get VIP / priority entry into cable cars ✔️ Private cable cars for your family only ✔️ No queues at all ⏳ Day visitors wait 60–90 minutes EACH side, and 10–15 people are packed into one cable car. This benefit alone saves hours. ⸻ 🎢 Fantasy Park with ZERO crowds 🗓️ Friday–Sunday: Open till 7 PM in the evening while day visitors leave by 4:30 PM. Unlimited FREE Rides, games, and 4D/5D shows — repeated multiple times 🎮🎠 No queues. No rush. Full fun mode 😍 ⸻ 🎿 Alpine Coaster Happy Hours = Double Win at this Gravity Based Roller Coasters 🎢, Most Popular at Ba Na 💰 Pay just VND 50k (instead of VND 80k) ⏰ 4:30–5:30 PM | 8:30–9:30 AM 🚫 Almost no waiting 🌫️ Evening mist rides on mountains = unforgettable ⸻ 🌉 Golden Hand Bridge — crowd-free access The iconic Golden Bridge is accessible ONLY to Mercure guests from 6 AM–8 AM Till ~9 AM, there are very few people — perfect for photos & serenity 📸 ⸻ 🚡 30% discount on Cable Car + ALL attractions if purchased at Mercure check-in, The two-way Cable Car tickets includes 👇following on all days on your Stay ✔️ All cable cars (up, down & internal) ✔️ All funiculars 🚆 ✔️ Unlimited Fantasy Park & Moon Castle games ✔️ 4D / 5D / 7D & 360° movies ✔️ Flying Eye Theatre ✔️ Indoor & outdoor bumper cars ✔️ All rides ✔️ Sun Castle & Moon/Lunar Castle ✔️ Le Jardin D’Amour, Pagoda & Love Garden 🌸 ✔️ Thác Thần Mặt Trời waterfall & Golden Horse Statue ✔️Except Alpine Coasters & 10D Show, everything is Free, unlimited times 🤩 Most day visitors don’t even realise what they miss. ⸻ 💡 Bottom Line: Ba Na Hills is NOT meant to be rushed. You need time to feel the vibe and explore peacefully. After staying there, I honestly wished I had booked 2 nights instead of 1. 🏰 A night stay at Mercure Ba Na Hills isn’t just about the hotel — it unlocks the best version of Ba Na Hills. 🔖 Save this post 🇻🇳 Stay tuned for more Vietnam travel & credit-card-optimised travel tips. 📘 Visit SpendWisely Blog: Detailed credit card reviews & guides 👉 Some links may be referral links in the above post. It supports the page without any cost to you. #creditcard #spendwisely #creditcards
0:56

Real Benefits of Staying Overnight at Accor’s Mercure Ba Na Hills 🏰☁️ Save Time • Save Money • Experience the REAL Ba Na Hills If Ba Na Hills, Vietnam 🇻🇳 is on your itinerary, do NOT do it as a day trip. An overnight stay at Mercure Ba Na Hills French Village completely changes the experience — and most people miss this 👇 ⸻ 🚡 World’s most unique hotel access — arrive by cable car with luggage This is the ONLY hotel where you reach your hotel room via cable car — with your luggage 🎒🧳 Your stay literally starts with a scenic cable car journey over the lush green forest, waterfalls and through the clouds ☁️ No roads. No buses. Just views and vibes. ⸻ ✨ Ba Na Hills at night = pure magic After sunset 🌄, it feels like you’re staying above the clouds ☁️ Silent streets, misty castles, and unreal vibes — something day visitors never see. 🚶‍♂️ Post 4:30 PM = Ba Na Hills becomes yours Once the day crowd leaves: • Empty streets • Quiet castles • Peaceful photo spots 📸 • Zero chaos ⸻ 🚡 VIP Cable Car access (Huge hidden benefit!) ✔️ Mercure guests get VIP / priority entry into cable cars ✔️ Private cable cars for your family only ✔️ No queues at all ⏳ Day visitors wait 60–90 minutes EACH side, and 10–15 people are packed into one cable car. This benefit alone saves hours. ⸻ 🎢 Fantasy Park with ZERO crowds 🗓️ Friday–Sunday: Open till 7 PM in the evening while day visitors leave by 4:30 PM. Unlimited FREE Rides, games, and 4D/5D shows — repeated multiple times 🎮🎠 No queues. No rush. Full fun mode 😍 ⸻ 🎿 Alpine Coaster Happy Hours = Double Win at this Gravity Based Roller Coasters 🎢, Most Popular at Ba Na 💰 Pay just VND 50k (instead of VND 80k) ⏰ 4:30–5:30 PM | 8:30–9:30 AM 🚫 Almost no waiting 🌫️ Evening mist rides on mountains = unforgettable ⸻ 🌉 Golden Hand Bridge — crowd-free access The iconic Golden Bridge is accessible ONLY to Mercure guests from 6 AM–8 AM Till ~9 AM, there are very few people — perfect for photos & serenity 📸 ⸻ 🚡 30% discount on Cable Car + ALL attractions if purchased at Mercure check-in, The two-way Cable Car tickets includes 👇following on all days on your Stay ✔️ All cable cars (up, down & internal) ✔️ All funiculars 🚆 ✔️ Unlimited Fantasy Park & Moon Castle games ✔️ 4D / 5D / 7D & 360° movies ✔️ Flying Eye Theatre ✔️ Indoor & outdoor bumper cars ✔️ All rides ✔️ Sun Castle & Moon/Lunar Castle ✔️ Le Jardin D’Amour, Pagoda & Love Garden 🌸 ✔️ Thác Thần Mặt Trời waterfall & Golden Horse Statue ✔️Except Alpine Coasters & 10D Show, everything is Free, unlimited times 🤩 Most day visitors don’t even realise what they miss. ⸻ 💡 Bottom Line: Ba Na Hills is NOT meant to be rushed. You need time to feel the vibe and explore peacefully. After staying there, I honestly wished I had booked 2 nights instead of 1. 🏰 A night stay at Mercure Ba Na Hills isn’t just about the hotel — it unlocks the best version of Ba Na Hills. 🔖 Save this post 🇻🇳 Stay tuned for more Vietnam travel & credit-card-optimised travel tips. 📘 Visit SpendWisely Blog: Detailed credit card reviews & guides 👉 Some links may be referral links in the above post. It supports the page without any cost to you. #creditcard #spendwisely #creditcards

SpendWisely

29,433 次观看 • 7 个月前

Hi, Kevin. International law prof + retired combat soldier/military lawyer U.S. Army here. I watched the show, too. If you're genuinely curious about the discrepancy between Bill Maher & some groups/agencies on the "genocide" issue, read on. You may not hear back from Bill, but I am glad to bring focus to the discrepancy between Bill's correct opinion & that of "some groups and agencies" that "are in disagreement." To start, let's recap what Bill said in case not everyone did see the show in question. This was an episode of Real Time with Bill Maher that aired HBO Max this past Friday (8/21). His guests for this segment were Dana Bash & The New York Times reporter Jeremy Peters. For reference, video for the full episode is available YouTube here (HBO Max subscription required): & audio is available Spotify here: & Apple Podcasts here: For ease of reference & analysis, though, I've added the clip in question as the first attachment to this post. As you can see, Bill is talking about the current situation in Democrats party. On that subject, he says, "They think Gaza is a genocide. It is not. There's an actual meaning [for] the word 'genocide.' It doesn't come close." This discussion continues for another minute or so, and his guests Dana & Jeremy join in on occasion. What we don't see in this clip is an explanation for what you refer to as a discrepancy between Bill's view & that of "some groups & agencies" to which you refer. That's the point of the rest of this post - to fill in that gap that doesn't get addressed in Bill's commentary. The short answer for clarifying the discrepancy can be summarized in just 2 words: sources & methodology. Allow me to explain. Regarding sources, you need to be aware - if you're not already - that the primary source for establishing international law is ... nations. It's right there in the name: interNATIONal law - or law between nations. And this is probably so elementary it doesn't need to be said, but I'll say it anyway: "some groups & agencies" are not nation-states. At best, groups like Amnesty International & Human Rights Watch & International Association of Genocide Scholars (which prudently nuked its account after it released the ill-advised "resolution" referred to in the screenshot of what appears to be the Google AI search results you included with your post) qualify as subsidiary sources of international law. So, there isn't actually a "consensus" among such groups. The only people who claim otherwise are those who selectively highlight the groups that have claimed Israel ישראל is responsible for #genocide in #Gaza while ignoring the experts & groups who have determined otherwise. Even so, citing to findings of these groups - regardless of where they land on the genocide issue - represents a fundamental misunderstanding regarding how interNATIONal law is formed. If we stick to the primary source of international law - you know, actual nations - only about 1 in 3 United Nations Member States have publicly announced or concluded there is/was genocide in Gaza. Specifically, that's 64 out of 193 UN Member States that have made that determination. 129 have either announced their determination that there is NO genocide or they haven't taken a public stance on the issue (most of the latter are waiting for the final judgement in RSA v. Isr CIJ_ICJ, which likely won't be reached for several years). And how do we know that only 64 of 193 UN Member States have publicly announced a "genocide" determination? Easy. I counted. 64 represents the most generous tally I could possibly develop, and it is still only about 33% of UN Member States (pic 1, and it's a number I assess will reduce even more since I conducted the count about 2 months ago since many of these announcements were made for political reasons & domestic politics in several states have shifted from liberal to conservative since then). Ok, that's the full explanation for the first word in the short answer: sources. You're referring strictly to subsidiary sources as evidence of a "discrepancy" between Bill's view & that of "some groups & agencies." But if you refer to the primary source of international law, you'll notice there is no discrepancy at all. In fact, there is a "discrepancy" between states & this collection of "yes, genocide" groups & agencies to which you refer. And that brings us to the second word in the short answer: methodology. You see, the decisive element in determining whether a genocide has been committed typically involves intent. And assessing 🇮🇱 intent is where these "yes, genocide" groups & agencies go astray. Almost always, they correctly articulate the standard for genocidal intent. We can find that right there in the Genocide Convention. In case you're not aware, "genocide" involves committing specified acts "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such" (pic 2). Now, here's the methodology these groups & agencies adopt without exception. They refer to a carefully-selected sampling of commentary from certain 🇮🇱elected officials - often mistranslated, misrepresented, or taken out of context - to establish what they claim to be intent to destroy Palestinians, as an identity group, in whole or in part, as such. For example, they point to a comment from יואב גלנט - Yoav Gallant on 9 Oct 2023 - just 2 days after the 10/7 terror attacks - saying Israel Defense Forces is fighting against "human animals." However, it's clear from the context that Gallant was referring to Hamas, not the Palestinian population as a whole. There's also a quote from Israel ישראלiPM Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו that is always cited in which he says, during remarks televised on 28 Oct 2023, "Remember what Amalek did to you." For those who aren't familiar, this is a reference to Deuteronomy 25:17–19, which says: "Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey, after you left Egypt — how, undeterred by fear of God, he surprised you on the march, when you were famished and weary, and cut down all the stragglers in your rear. Therefore, when the Eternal your God grants you safety from all your enemies around you, in the land that the Eternal your God is giving you as a hereditary portion, you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget!" So, this excerpt from this televised address is almost always referred to as "evidence" that Netanyahu's intent is to destroy Palestinians, in whole or in part, as such. The problem is (one problem among many, actually), this Amalek reference is taken out of context. Because here's what Netanyahu also says during these remarks: "Yesterday evening, additional ground forces of ours entered the gates of Gaza, at the doorstep of the fortress of evil. This is the second stage of the war, the goals of which are clear: Destroying Hamas's military and governing capabilities, and bringing the captives back home" (full speech available here: Notice the part I emphasized with bold + italics text there? The goal of the campaign is clear: destroy Hamas & bring home all hostages. And this is the part that all these groups & agencies conveniently leave out. In fact, returning all hostages (which has now been completed) & ending the enduring security threat posed by Hamas have been the stated strategic objectives of the military campaign in Gaza all along. To expand on the goals expressed in the "Amalek" speech in late October 2023, Netanyahu also indicated on the 2 year anniversary of 10/7 that the "aims of the war" are to "return all the hostages, destroy the Hamas regime, and ensure that Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel" (pic 3). With that stated strategic intent in mind, do you think intending to destroy a transnational terrorist group - Hamas - in whole, if necessary, in order to end the enduring security threat posed by said terrorist group qualifies as genocide? No. That is war. And this is where the methodology of all these "yes, genocide" groups & agencies is fundamentally flawed. They fail to start with the actual stated intent of the military campaign in Gaza then assess whether the conduct of the campaign is consistent with that intent or, instead, the intent is to destroy Palestinians as an identity group in whole or in part as such? At this point, you might be asking why they don't adopt a doctrinal methodology to assessing intent. The answer to that question is simple. Because if they evaluated intent properly, they wouldn't reach the conclusion they want to and seek to reach. Instead, they would agree with Bill Maher. It's not a genocide, and "it doesn't come close." Of course, I'm not here to speak for Bill Maher. But if you are genuinely curious why there is such a "discrepancy" between his view and that of the "groups and agencies" to which you refer - that is the answer. Sources, and methodology. If the reason why that is the case isn't clear from the analysis above, I would be glad to continue this exchange - whether in public or in private. #TheMoreYouKnow #NoGenocide #TruthMatters #legaldisinformation
1:10

Hi, Kevin. International law prof + retired combat soldier/military lawyer U.S. Army here. I watched the show, too. If you're genuinely curious about the discrepancy between Bill Maher & some groups/agencies on the "genocide" issue, read on. You may not hear back from Bill, but I am glad to bring focus to the discrepancy between Bill's correct opinion & that of "some groups and agencies" that "are in disagreement." To start, let's recap what Bill said in case not everyone did see the show in question. This was an episode of Real Time with Bill Maher that aired HBO Max this past Friday (8/21). His guests for this segment were Dana Bash & The New York Times reporter Jeremy Peters. For reference, video for the full episode is available YouTube here (HBO Max subscription required): & audio is available Spotify here: & Apple Podcasts here: For ease of reference & analysis, though, I've added the clip in question as the first attachment to this post. As you can see, Bill is talking about the current situation in Democrats party. On that subject, he says, "They think Gaza is a genocide. It is not. There's an actual meaning [for] the word 'genocide.' It doesn't come close." This discussion continues for another minute or so, and his guests Dana & Jeremy join in on occasion. What we don't see in this clip is an explanation for what you refer to as a discrepancy between Bill's view & that of "some groups & agencies" to which you refer. That's the point of the rest of this post - to fill in that gap that doesn't get addressed in Bill's commentary. The short answer for clarifying the discrepancy can be summarized in just 2 words: sources & methodology. Allow me to explain. Regarding sources, you need to be aware - if you're not already - that the primary source for establishing international law is ... nations. It's right there in the name: interNATIONal law - or law between nations. And this is probably so elementary it doesn't need to be said, but I'll say it anyway: "some groups & agencies" are not nation-states. At best, groups like Amnesty International & Human Rights Watch & International Association of Genocide Scholars (which prudently nuked its account after it released the ill-advised "resolution" referred to in the screenshot of what appears to be the Google AI search results you included with your post) qualify as subsidiary sources of international law. So, there isn't actually a "consensus" among such groups. The only people who claim otherwise are those who selectively highlight the groups that have claimed Israel ישראל is responsible for #genocide in #Gaza while ignoring the experts & groups who have determined otherwise. Even so, citing to findings of these groups - regardless of where they land on the genocide issue - represents a fundamental misunderstanding regarding how interNATIONal law is formed. If we stick to the primary source of international law - you know, actual nations - only about 1 in 3 United Nations Member States have publicly announced or concluded there is/was genocide in Gaza. Specifically, that's 64 out of 193 UN Member States that have made that determination. 129 have either announced their determination that there is NO genocide or they haven't taken a public stance on the issue (most of the latter are waiting for the final judgement in RSA v. Isr CIJ_ICJ, which likely won't be reached for several years). And how do we know that only 64 of 193 UN Member States have publicly announced a "genocide" determination? Easy. I counted. 64 represents the most generous tally I could possibly develop, and it is still only about 33% of UN Member States (pic 1, and it's a number I assess will reduce even more since I conducted the count about 2 months ago since many of these announcements were made for political reasons & domestic politics in several states have shifted from liberal to conservative since then). Ok, that's the full explanation for the first word in the short answer: sources. You're referring strictly to subsidiary sources as evidence of a "discrepancy" between Bill's view & that of "some groups & agencies." But if you refer to the primary source of international law, you'll notice there is no discrepancy at all. In fact, there is a "discrepancy" between states & this collection of "yes, genocide" groups & agencies to which you refer. And that brings us to the second word in the short answer: methodology. You see, the decisive element in determining whether a genocide has been committed typically involves intent. And assessing 🇮🇱 intent is where these "yes, genocide" groups & agencies go astray. Almost always, they correctly articulate the standard for genocidal intent. We can find that right there in the Genocide Convention. In case you're not aware, "genocide" involves committing specified acts "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such" (pic 2). Now, here's the methodology these groups & agencies adopt without exception. They refer to a carefully-selected sampling of commentary from certain 🇮🇱elected officials - often mistranslated, misrepresented, or taken out of context - to establish what they claim to be intent to destroy Palestinians, as an identity group, in whole or in part, as such. For example, they point to a comment from יואב גלנט - Yoav Gallant on 9 Oct 2023 - just 2 days after the 10/7 terror attacks - saying Israel Defense Forces is fighting against "human animals." However, it's clear from the context that Gallant was referring to Hamas, not the Palestinian population as a whole. There's also a quote from Israel ישראלiPM Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו that is always cited in which he says, during remarks televised on 28 Oct 2023, "Remember what Amalek did to you." For those who aren't familiar, this is a reference to Deuteronomy 25:17–19, which says: "Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey, after you left Egypt — how, undeterred by fear of God, he surprised you on the march, when you were famished and weary, and cut down all the stragglers in your rear. Therefore, when the Eternal your God grants you safety from all your enemies around you, in the land that the Eternal your God is giving you as a hereditary portion, you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget!" So, this excerpt from this televised address is almost always referred to as "evidence" that Netanyahu's intent is to destroy Palestinians, in whole or in part, as such. The problem is (one problem among many, actually), this Amalek reference is taken out of context. Because here's what Netanyahu also says during these remarks: "Yesterday evening, additional ground forces of ours entered the gates of Gaza, at the doorstep of the fortress of evil. This is the second stage of the war, the goals of which are clear: Destroying Hamas's military and governing capabilities, and bringing the captives back home" (full speech available here: Notice the part I emphasized with bold + italics text there? The goal of the campaign is clear: destroy Hamas & bring home all hostages. And this is the part that all these groups & agencies conveniently leave out. In fact, returning all hostages (which has now been completed) & ending the enduring security threat posed by Hamas have been the stated strategic objectives of the military campaign in Gaza all along. To expand on the goals expressed in the "Amalek" speech in late October 2023, Netanyahu also indicated on the 2 year anniversary of 10/7 that the "aims of the war" are to "return all the hostages, destroy the Hamas regime, and ensure that Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel" (pic 3). With that stated strategic intent in mind, do you think intending to destroy a transnational terrorist group - Hamas - in whole, if necessary, in order to end the enduring security threat posed by said terrorist group qualifies as genocide? No. That is war. And this is where the methodology of all these "yes, genocide" groups & agencies is fundamentally flawed. They fail to start with the actual stated intent of the military campaign in Gaza then assess whether the conduct of the campaign is consistent with that intent or, instead, the intent is to destroy Palestinians as an identity group in whole or in part as such? At this point, you might be asking why they don't adopt a doctrinal methodology to assessing intent. The answer to that question is simple. Because if they evaluated intent properly, they wouldn't reach the conclusion they want to and seek to reach. Instead, they would agree with Bill Maher. It's not a genocide, and "it doesn't come close." Of course, I'm not here to speak for Bill Maher. But if you are genuinely curious why there is such a "discrepancy" between his view and that of the "groups and agencies" to which you refer - that is the answer. Sources, and methodology. If the reason why that is the case isn't clear from the analysis above, I would be glad to continue this exchange - whether in public or in private. #TheMoreYouKnow #NoGenocide #TruthMatters #legaldisinformation

Dr. Brian L. Cox

20,130 次观看 • 12 小时前

🚨 BREAKING: Former CIA and NASA officials engage in multi-year long study of UFO “super experiencer” Chris Bledsoe (Chris Bledsoe). They give him “exotic metal” testing his reactions, take him through off-limits parts of Kennedy Space Center and even claim to give a message Bledsoe received from a contact experience directly to President Obama🚨 Chris Bledsoe had a life-changing UFO experience in 2007 which led to direct interactions with beings and eventually a feminine figure he calls “The Lady”. That’s when NASA showed up at his doorstep; he spent years in direct contact with Hal Povenmire and Tim Taylor; the latter, a senior NASA mission controller. In this episode, Bledsoe describes Taylor’s involvement in recovered exotic materials, a trip he takes Bledsoe on to Zanesville, Ohio, the birthplace of anti-gravity researcher Thomas Townsend Brown, and Taylor and Brown’s bizarre past connections that Taylor claims involves secret time travel technology. 1. NASA’s Interest In UFOs: Tim Taylor is a longtime NASA mission controller whose career dates back to the Space Shuttle era. Bledsoe says Taylor came to his home with credentials spanning NASA, the CIA, NRO etc. tested his entire family with exotic metal, and concluded Bledsoe had undergone direct contact based on his physical reaction. 2. The Metal Test: Taylor placed two different metal samples in Bledsoe’s hands. One behaved like rigid aluminum. The other resembled foil that could not crease and appeared to transmit a current between samples. When combined, Bledsoe experienced a sudden neurological reaction that caused Taylor to pull the metal away and say he had only seen two similar reactions before. 3. UFO Crash Retrieval Trip: Taylor later took Bledsoe to Zanesville, Ohio, where they retrieved a piece of anomalous metal from a private individual. The object reportedly fell glowing from the sky years earlier and was stored untouched for over a decade. Taylor brought Bledsoe to a machine shop to cut the metal, took one portion, and returned the other to the owner. 4. Why Zanesville Matters: Zanesville is the birthplace of Thomas Townsend Brown, the mid-20th century physicist who conducted classified electrogravitics research and worked with military and intelligence-linked aerospace programs. Brown’s work remains tied to early anti-gravity experiments referenced in declassified documents and foreign intelligence reports. 5. Townsend Brown & Tim Taylor: Bledsoe says Taylor spoke openly about Townsend Brown and assisted Brown’s daughter with research for her book. Taylor allegedly described stories of non-human beings visiting Brown and sharing information, details that align with statements later surfaced by Brown’s family. 6. Recovered Material Pipeline: Bledsoe confirms Taylor also brought Tom DeLonge and Lue Elizondo to the same Ohio source to obtain pieces of the metal. He says Hal Puthoff was aware of the material and that multiple fragments circulated among defense-linked researchers. 7. Secret Science – Biomedical Applications: Bledsoe says he was involved in diagramming concepts later associated with biomedical technologies using similar material. He references Vivex Biologics, a company founded by Taylor that developed regenerative treatments and was later sold for tens of millions of dollars. 8. The Nassau Group: Bledsoe recounts Taylor telling him and his son about a secret group operating out of Nassau, Bahamas, explicitly described as a time-travel group. Taylor claimed Townsend Brown was involved and told Bledsoe he might need to hide there for protection during the early years of his contact experiences. 9. Time Travel Claims: Taylor repeatedly referenced timelines, adjustment protocols, and the film The Adjustment Bureau, telling Bledsoe he worked for “the Hammer,” a higher authority that “works for God.” Bledsoe says Taylor framed his role as influencing outcomes rather than observing them. 10. Pattern Across Experiencers: Taylor appears repeatedly in the lives of other high-profile experiencers, including figures connected to aerospace, intelligence, and consciousness research. Bledsoe says Taylor actively sought out individuals he believed were authentic and capable of interacting with non-human technology. This story is fascinating and weaves together mystical experiences, fascinating intelligence links, antigravity, time travel and more. Hopefully this is clear from the show, but I am not promoting any of the details Bledsoe claims (including any of the images he provides) as fully true or independently corroborated – just extremely worthy of scrutiny, further investigation and engagement. Full Episode👇
1:19

🚨 BREAKING: Former CIA and NASA officials engage in multi-year long study of UFO “super experiencer” Chris Bledsoe (Chris Bledsoe). They give him “exotic metal” testing his reactions, take him through off-limits parts of Kennedy Space Center and even claim to give a message Bledsoe received from a contact experience directly to President Obama🚨 Chris Bledsoe had a life-changing UFO experience in 2007 which led to direct interactions with beings and eventually a feminine figure he calls “The Lady”. That’s when NASA showed up at his doorstep; he spent years in direct contact with Hal Povenmire and Tim Taylor; the latter, a senior NASA mission controller. In this episode, Bledsoe describes Taylor’s involvement in recovered exotic materials, a trip he takes Bledsoe on to Zanesville, Ohio, the birthplace of anti-gravity researcher Thomas Townsend Brown, and Taylor and Brown’s bizarre past connections that Taylor claims involves secret time travel technology. 1. NASA’s Interest In UFOs: Tim Taylor is a longtime NASA mission controller whose career dates back to the Space Shuttle era. Bledsoe says Taylor came to his home with credentials spanning NASA, the CIA, NRO etc. tested his entire family with exotic metal, and concluded Bledsoe had undergone direct contact based on his physical reaction. 2. The Metal Test: Taylor placed two different metal samples in Bledsoe’s hands. One behaved like rigid aluminum. The other resembled foil that could not crease and appeared to transmit a current between samples. When combined, Bledsoe experienced a sudden neurological reaction that caused Taylor to pull the metal away and say he had only seen two similar reactions before. 3. UFO Crash Retrieval Trip: Taylor later took Bledsoe to Zanesville, Ohio, where they retrieved a piece of anomalous metal from a private individual. The object reportedly fell glowing from the sky years earlier and was stored untouched for over a decade. Taylor brought Bledsoe to a machine shop to cut the metal, took one portion, and returned the other to the owner. 4. Why Zanesville Matters: Zanesville is the birthplace of Thomas Townsend Brown, the mid-20th century physicist who conducted classified electrogravitics research and worked with military and intelligence-linked aerospace programs. Brown’s work remains tied to early anti-gravity experiments referenced in declassified documents and foreign intelligence reports. 5. Townsend Brown & Tim Taylor: Bledsoe says Taylor spoke openly about Townsend Brown and assisted Brown’s daughter with research for her book. Taylor allegedly described stories of non-human beings visiting Brown and sharing information, details that align with statements later surfaced by Brown’s family. 6. Recovered Material Pipeline: Bledsoe confirms Taylor also brought Tom DeLonge and Lue Elizondo to the same Ohio source to obtain pieces of the metal. He says Hal Puthoff was aware of the material and that multiple fragments circulated among defense-linked researchers. 7. Secret Science – Biomedical Applications: Bledsoe says he was involved in diagramming concepts later associated with biomedical technologies using similar material. He references Vivex Biologics, a company founded by Taylor that developed regenerative treatments and was later sold for tens of millions of dollars. 8. The Nassau Group: Bledsoe recounts Taylor telling him and his son about a secret group operating out of Nassau, Bahamas, explicitly described as a time-travel group. Taylor claimed Townsend Brown was involved and told Bledsoe he might need to hide there for protection during the early years of his contact experiences. 9. Time Travel Claims: Taylor repeatedly referenced timelines, adjustment protocols, and the film The Adjustment Bureau, telling Bledsoe he worked for “the Hammer,” a higher authority that “works for God.” Bledsoe says Taylor framed his role as influencing outcomes rather than observing them. 10. Pattern Across Experiencers: Taylor appears repeatedly in the lives of other high-profile experiencers, including figures connected to aerospace, intelligence, and consciousness research. Bledsoe says Taylor actively sought out individuals he believed were authentic and capable of interacting with non-human technology. This story is fascinating and weaves together mystical experiences, fascinating intelligence links, antigravity, time travel and more. Hopefully this is clear from the show, but I am not promoting any of the details Bledsoe claims (including any of the images he provides) as fully true or independently corroborated – just extremely worthy of scrutiny, further investigation and engagement. Full Episode👇

Jesse Michels

174,627 次观看 • 7 个月前

THE PRESIDENT NAMED HIM.. THE NUMBERS BACK IT UP.. NOW HE JOINS NovaRed Mining, he is a Legend ! Top facts to put on screen 1. President George W. Bush recognized Ed Kostenski at the White House on July 2, 2004, in the East Room. Bush called him out by name, said Ed started Nationwide Equipment “at my kitchen table,” and used him as a real American small-business success story. Bush also said Ed was adding 14 employees, planned to hire 6 more, and was investing $300,000 into expansion. 2. Founded Nationwide Equipment in 1983. EXIM described Nationwide as a Jacksonville-based company specializing in earthmoving, road-building, and mining equipment exports. 3. Global reach: 40+ countries by 2002, over 60 countries in later company materials. EXIM said Nationwide was selling to over 40 countries in 2002; the Nationwide catalog says the company serviced customers in over 60 countries. 4. Over $1 billion raised globally. Forbes reported that Kostenski’s group raised over $1 billion in private funding for construction projects and equipment. 5. Served on the U.S. Export-Import Bank advisory committee. In 2005, EXIM named Edward Kostenski, president, CEO, and founder of Nationwide Equipment, to its 10-member Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee. EXIM also stated that the committee advised on strengthening U.S. exports to Africa. 6. EXIM scale: EXIM said it helped finance $17.8 billion of U.S. exports in fiscal year 2004. This is EXIM’s institutional scale, not Ed’s personal financing number — but it shows the level of export-finance world he was connected to. 7. Nigeria monorail project: $98,938,000. Nationwide Finance says it raised over $98 million in initial debt funding for Phase 1 of the Rivers State Monorail Project in Nigeria. 8. Monorail project scale: Phase 1 covered 14 kilometers, was programmed to transport over 10 million people annually, and had mapped total project costs in excess of $700 million. 9. EXIM-backed Nigeria heavy-equipment transaction: In 2002, EXIM supported Nationwide’s export of used trucks, cranes, and heavy construction equipment to Nigeria with a $1.2 million medium-term guarantee policy. 10. Presidential “E” Star Award — 2010. The U.S. Department of Commerce named Nationwide Equipment Company of Jacksonville, Florida, as a recipient of the 2010 President’s “E Star” Award. Commerce describes the Presidential “E” Awards as the highest U.S. government honor for increasing exports. 11. Presidential “E” Award recognition. Nationwide’s catalog lists the 2001 President’s “E” Award for Excellence in Exports; an EXIM release separately says Nationwide was awarded the U.S. President’s “E” Award for Exports in 1998. To stay clean, say: “Presidential ‘E’ Award export recognition.” 12. 2011 U.S. Department of Commerce Export Achievement Award. Listed in Nationwide’s awards page. 13. Two-time Florida Governor’s Award for Excellence in Exports — 2004 and 2010. Listed in Nationwide’s awards page. 14. 2004 International Trader of the Year Award. Listed in Nationwide’s awards page. 15. Now joining NovaRed Mining. NovaRed announced Kostenski’s appointment to its Advisory Board, stating that he brings experience across mining equipment, infrastructure, energy, logistics, and project finance. NovaRed’s Wilmac copper-gold project covers 16,078 hectares in British Columbia, about 10 km west of Hudbay’s Copper Mountain Mine. This is Ed Kostenski. President George W. Bush called him out at the White House — a man who started Nationwide Equipment at his kitchen table and built it into a global industrial company. Founded in 1983. Operating across 60+ countries. Mining. Construction. Marine. Oil and gas. Dredging. Heavy equipment. Infrastructure. This man did not just sell machines. He helped move nations forward. His group raised over $1 billion globally for construction projects, equipment, and industrial development. He served on the advisory committee of the U.S. Export-Import Bank — America’s official export-credit agency, connected to billions in U.S. global trade support. He helped finance major international infrastructure — including $98,938,000 raised for Phase 1 of the Rivers State Monorail Project in Nigeria. That project covered 14 kilometers, was designed to move over 10 million people annually, and had mapped total project costs of more than $700 million. Then come the awards. Presidential “E” Award export recognition. 2010 Presidential “E Star” Award. 2011 U.S. Department of Commerce Export Achievement Award. Florida Governor’s Export Awards in 2004 and 2010. 2004 International Trader of the Year. White House recognition. EXIM Bank advisory service. Over $1 billion raised. Projects in mining, energy, rail, marine, and global infrastructure. And now… Ed Kostenski is joining NRED. At the exact moment copper is becoming one of the most important resources on Earth. Copper powers AI. Copper powers data centers. Copper powers robotics. Copper powers EVs. Copper powers defense systems. Copper powers the energy grid. NRED is not just adding an advisor. NRED is adding a man who understands how massive industrial projects are financed, equipped, shipped, built, and executed. This is not just a man. THIS MAN IS A LEGEND. DYOR ! Add to your watch list !
0:59

THE PRESIDENT NAMED HIM.. THE NUMBERS BACK IT UP.. NOW HE JOINS NovaRed Mining, he is a Legend ! Top facts to put on screen 1. President George W. Bush recognized Ed Kostenski at the White House on July 2, 2004, in the East Room. Bush called him out by name, said Ed started Nationwide Equipment “at my kitchen table,” and used him as a real American small-business success story. Bush also said Ed was adding 14 employees, planned to hire 6 more, and was investing $300,000 into expansion. 2. Founded Nationwide Equipment in 1983. EXIM described Nationwide as a Jacksonville-based company specializing in earthmoving, road-building, and mining equipment exports. 3. Global reach: 40+ countries by 2002, over 60 countries in later company materials. EXIM said Nationwide was selling to over 40 countries in 2002; the Nationwide catalog says the company serviced customers in over 60 countries. 4. Over $1 billion raised globally. Forbes reported that Kostenski’s group raised over $1 billion in private funding for construction projects and equipment. 5. Served on the U.S. Export-Import Bank advisory committee. In 2005, EXIM named Edward Kostenski, president, CEO, and founder of Nationwide Equipment, to its 10-member Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee. EXIM also stated that the committee advised on strengthening U.S. exports to Africa. 6. EXIM scale: EXIM said it helped finance $17.8 billion of U.S. exports in fiscal year 2004. This is EXIM’s institutional scale, not Ed’s personal financing number — but it shows the level of export-finance world he was connected to. 7. Nigeria monorail project: $98,938,000. Nationwide Finance says it raised over $98 million in initial debt funding for Phase 1 of the Rivers State Monorail Project in Nigeria. 8. Monorail project scale: Phase 1 covered 14 kilometers, was programmed to transport over 10 million people annually, and had mapped total project costs in excess of $700 million. 9. EXIM-backed Nigeria heavy-equipment transaction: In 2002, EXIM supported Nationwide’s export of used trucks, cranes, and heavy construction equipment to Nigeria with a $1.2 million medium-term guarantee policy. 10. Presidential “E” Star Award — 2010. The U.S. Department of Commerce named Nationwide Equipment Company of Jacksonville, Florida, as a recipient of the 2010 President’s “E Star” Award. Commerce describes the Presidential “E” Awards as the highest U.S. government honor for increasing exports. 11. Presidential “E” Award recognition. Nationwide’s catalog lists the 2001 President’s “E” Award for Excellence in Exports; an EXIM release separately says Nationwide was awarded the U.S. President’s “E” Award for Exports in 1998. To stay clean, say: “Presidential ‘E’ Award export recognition.” 12. 2011 U.S. Department of Commerce Export Achievement Award. Listed in Nationwide’s awards page. 13. Two-time Florida Governor’s Award for Excellence in Exports — 2004 and 2010. Listed in Nationwide’s awards page. 14. 2004 International Trader of the Year Award. Listed in Nationwide’s awards page. 15. Now joining NovaRed Mining. NovaRed announced Kostenski’s appointment to its Advisory Board, stating that he brings experience across mining equipment, infrastructure, energy, logistics, and project finance. NovaRed’s Wilmac copper-gold project covers 16,078 hectares in British Columbia, about 10 km west of Hudbay’s Copper Mountain Mine. This is Ed Kostenski. President George W. Bush called him out at the White House — a man who started Nationwide Equipment at his kitchen table and built it into a global industrial company. Founded in 1983. Operating across 60+ countries. Mining. Construction. Marine. Oil and gas. Dredging. Heavy equipment. Infrastructure. This man did not just sell machines. He helped move nations forward. His group raised over $1 billion globally for construction projects, equipment, and industrial development. He served on the advisory committee of the U.S. Export-Import Bank — America’s official export-credit agency, connected to billions in U.S. global trade support. He helped finance major international infrastructure — including $98,938,000 raised for Phase 1 of the Rivers State Monorail Project in Nigeria. That project covered 14 kilometers, was designed to move over 10 million people annually, and had mapped total project costs of more than $700 million. Then come the awards. Presidential “E” Award export recognition. 2010 Presidential “E Star” Award. 2011 U.S. Department of Commerce Export Achievement Award. Florida Governor’s Export Awards in 2004 and 2010. 2004 International Trader of the Year. White House recognition. EXIM Bank advisory service. Over $1 billion raised. Projects in mining, energy, rail, marine, and global infrastructure. And now… Ed Kostenski is joining NRED. At the exact moment copper is becoming one of the most important resources on Earth. Copper powers AI. Copper powers data centers. Copper powers robotics. Copper powers EVs. Copper powers defense systems. Copper powers the energy grid. NRED is not just adding an advisor. NRED is adding a man who understands how massive industrial projects are financed, equipped, shipped, built, and executed. This is not just a man. THIS MAN IS A LEGEND. DYOR ! Add to your watch list !

Victor Renard

41,081,144 次观看 • 2 个月前

A short timeline. Just what happened, in order. Decide for yourselves. 1. A DRep (⛏️Dr. Navjit Dhaliwal) asked whether DReps with paid IO-linked roles should abstain on IO's treasury proposals. A normal conflict-of-interest question. 2. Charles did not answer the question. He went after Iagon - publicly, repeatedly, over days, to his 1M+ follower account, with IO employees and IO-aligned accounts amplifying. He said Navjit had "lost the plot," called the concern "objectively wrong," and publicly stated Iagon's leadership should be replaced or the project could collapse. 3. IAG fell ~32% in 24h. Holders - who are also ADA holders - lost real money. 4. As IAG was crashing, the price-crash chart was posted at Charles. He replied with a video clip of Bane: "Your punishment must be more severe... not of your body... of your soul." 5. Charles began describing the conflict-of-interest question as an "attack on his ambassadors." It was not. No ambassador was attacked. A DRep asked, in public, whether DReps with paid IO ties should abstain on IO's proposals - a standard governance question. Reframing a question as an "attack" is what made everything that followed look justified. 6. On that false premise, Charles hosted an X Space and said, about the token holders of a project in his own ecosystem: "I don't give a shit about your token holders... I don't give a shit about your bag holders... If you attack my ambassadors, I will burn you to the ground." He also said the way out was to "apologize" and "back the fuck off." 7. When a community member said I was "obsessed," Charles replied that I have "CDS," that it is "incurable," and that people should "let him go." CDS - Cognitive Dysfunction Syndrome - is a veterinary diagnosis: age-related dementia in dogs and cats. So a sitting DRep raising sourced concerns was described in the language a vet uses for a deteriorating animal. 8. Charles then posted a unity video: the only thing that can destroy Cardano is internal fighting. 9. When some Japanese DReps voted against IO's research proposal, Charles posted directly to the Japanese community: if the proposal did not pass, "Cardano will lose its scientists" and "our lab will be forced to close." He then asked the community to "delegate to dReps who support Cardano's research agenda" - in other words, to move voting power away from DReps who voted the wrong way. When that pressure did not deliver the result, the threat hardened: approve the proposal, or be responsible for ending Cardano's research entirely. Only after this also failed to work did the tone suddenly soften. 10. As hundreds of holders engaged with these concerns, Charles shifted tone - "#strongertogether," inviting conversation. 11. I took that at face value. Then I did something he never did. After he attacked Iagon, after the "burn you to the ground," after his words helped wipe ~32% off a token held by thousands - I was the one who extended a hand. I publicly offered him a private, no-recording, one-on-one call. Man to man. Not for me - for the ecosystem. The person who was attacked took the first step toward peace. 12. His public answer to that olive branch was the pattern again, in one post. He said: "Tell him to go to hell." He demanded I issue "a public apology FOR EVERYTHING he said" before he would even speak. He said: "You don't treat me like a human toilet." And then, in the last three lines: "He's trash. Everyone can see it now. We move on." Read that ending again. I offered him a private, calm conversation - and his response was to call me "trash" and tell the audience that this proves something about me. He attacked, and in the same breath framed the attack as evidence against the person he attacked. That is the reversal in its purest form: be the aggressor, then announce that the aggression exposes the victim. That is the sequence. I offered a calm, private conversation - and that was the response to it. One more thing worth seeing plainly. Not days apart. The same afternoon - roughly two hours between these two posts. First, in public, to the ecosystem: "Cardano is alive. The community is engaged... You are not passive holders. You are owners." "Let me show up the way I should." "I am inviting all of you to sit down and have a real conversation." "I am 100% focused on Cardano and Midnight. #strongertogether" Roughly two hours later, to me, after I publicly offered exactly that - a private, calm, one-on-one conversation: "Tell him to go to hell." "Have him issue a public apology FOR EVERYTHING he said." "You don't treat me like a human toilet." "He's trash. Everyone can see it now." That is the gap. "Stronger together" for the audience. Two hours later, "go to hell" and "he's trash" for the person who took him up on it. A real invitation to talk does not come with a demand to grovel first - and it does not curdle into "go to hell" within the same afternoon. Look at the whole shape of this. He attacked. He did not answer the question - he went after the people who asked it. When the damage was done and holders were losing money, he posted about punishment and souls. He said in public he would burn people to the ground. He pressured an entire national community to vote his way or be blamed for the end of Cardano's research. And then, step by step, he became the victim. The question became an "attack." The critics became aggressors. The man with 1M followers and the treasury proposals became the wronged party defending the vulnerable. When I - the one who was attacked - offered peace, he framed himself as the one owed an apology, and called me "trash" for asking. That reversal has a name: DARVO. Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. It is not a diagnosis. It is a pattern, and the record above is the pattern, step by step, in his own words. So the practical question stands: Is this conduct - the attacks, the Bane clip aimed at people losing money, the "burn you to the ground," the pressure on the Japanese community, the false "victim" framing, the rejection of a good-faith olive branch - the conduct of someone who should be trusted with hundreds of millions of ADA from the community treasury? Cardano does not have a "leader." It has a community, a treasury, and contractors who ask that community for funding. IO is one of those contractors - currently asking for hundreds of millions of ADA, with a track record of missed timelines. A contractor asking the community for money does not get to attack the members of that community for doing the exact thing the governance system was built for: participating, voting, and asking questions. Respect for ADA holders is not optional for someone requesting their treasury. It is the job. Screenshots of every quote above are attached. Read them in full, and decide for yourselves.👇👇👇
0:37

A short timeline. Just what happened, in order. Decide for yourselves. 1. A DRep (⛏️Dr. Navjit Dhaliwal) asked whether DReps with paid IO-linked roles should abstain on IO's treasury proposals. A normal conflict-of-interest question. 2. Charles did not answer the question. He went after Iagon - publicly, repeatedly, over days, to his 1M+ follower account, with IO employees and IO-aligned accounts amplifying. He said Navjit had "lost the plot," called the concern "objectively wrong," and publicly stated Iagon's leadership should be replaced or the project could collapse. 3. IAG fell ~32% in 24h. Holders - who are also ADA holders - lost real money. 4. As IAG was crashing, the price-crash chart was posted at Charles. He replied with a video clip of Bane: "Your punishment must be more severe... not of your body... of your soul." 5. Charles began describing the conflict-of-interest question as an "attack on his ambassadors." It was not. No ambassador was attacked. A DRep asked, in public, whether DReps with paid IO ties should abstain on IO's proposals - a standard governance question. Reframing a question as an "attack" is what made everything that followed look justified. 6. On that false premise, Charles hosted an X Space and said, about the token holders of a project in his own ecosystem: "I don't give a shit about your token holders... I don't give a shit about your bag holders... If you attack my ambassadors, I will burn you to the ground." He also said the way out was to "apologize" and "back the fuck off." 7. When a community member said I was "obsessed," Charles replied that I have "CDS," that it is "incurable," and that people should "let him go." CDS - Cognitive Dysfunction Syndrome - is a veterinary diagnosis: age-related dementia in dogs and cats. So a sitting DRep raising sourced concerns was described in the language a vet uses for a deteriorating animal. 8. Charles then posted a unity video: the only thing that can destroy Cardano is internal fighting. 9. When some Japanese DReps voted against IO's research proposal, Charles posted directly to the Japanese community: if the proposal did not pass, "Cardano will lose its scientists" and "our lab will be forced to close." He then asked the community to "delegate to dReps who support Cardano's research agenda" - in other words, to move voting power away from DReps who voted the wrong way. When that pressure did not deliver the result, the threat hardened: approve the proposal, or be responsible for ending Cardano's research entirely. Only after this also failed to work did the tone suddenly soften. 10. As hundreds of holders engaged with these concerns, Charles shifted tone - "#strongertogether," inviting conversation. 11. I took that at face value. Then I did something he never did. After he attacked Iagon, after the "burn you to the ground," after his words helped wipe ~32% off a token held by thousands - I was the one who extended a hand. I publicly offered him a private, no-recording, one-on-one call. Man to man. Not for me - for the ecosystem. The person who was attacked took the first step toward peace. 12. His public answer to that olive branch was the pattern again, in one post. He said: "Tell him to go to hell." He demanded I issue "a public apology FOR EVERYTHING he said" before he would even speak. He said: "You don't treat me like a human toilet." And then, in the last three lines: "He's trash. Everyone can see it now. We move on." Read that ending again. I offered him a private, calm conversation - and his response was to call me "trash" and tell the audience that this proves something about me. He attacked, and in the same breath framed the attack as evidence against the person he attacked. That is the reversal in its purest form: be the aggressor, then announce that the aggression exposes the victim. That is the sequence. I offered a calm, private conversation - and that was the response to it. One more thing worth seeing plainly. Not days apart. The same afternoon - roughly two hours between these two posts. First, in public, to the ecosystem: "Cardano is alive. The community is engaged... You are not passive holders. You are owners." "Let me show up the way I should." "I am inviting all of you to sit down and have a real conversation." "I am 100% focused on Cardano and Midnight. #strongertogether" Roughly two hours later, to me, after I publicly offered exactly that - a private, calm, one-on-one conversation: "Tell him to go to hell." "Have him issue a public apology FOR EVERYTHING he said." "You don't treat me like a human toilet." "He's trash. Everyone can see it now." That is the gap. "Stronger together" for the audience. Two hours later, "go to hell" and "he's trash" for the person who took him up on it. A real invitation to talk does not come with a demand to grovel first - and it does not curdle into "go to hell" within the same afternoon. Look at the whole shape of this. He attacked. He did not answer the question - he went after the people who asked it. When the damage was done and holders were losing money, he posted about punishment and souls. He said in public he would burn people to the ground. He pressured an entire national community to vote his way or be blamed for the end of Cardano's research. And then, step by step, he became the victim. The question became an "attack." The critics became aggressors. The man with 1M followers and the treasury proposals became the wronged party defending the vulnerable. When I - the one who was attacked - offered peace, he framed himself as the one owed an apology, and called me "trash" for asking. That reversal has a name: DARVO. Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. It is not a diagnosis. It is a pattern, and the record above is the pattern, step by step, in his own words. So the practical question stands: Is this conduct - the attacks, the Bane clip aimed at people losing money, the "burn you to the ground," the pressure on the Japanese community, the false "victim" framing, the rejection of a good-faith olive branch - the conduct of someone who should be trusted with hundreds of millions of ADA from the community treasury? Cardano does not have a "leader." It has a community, a treasury, and contractors who ask that community for funding. IO is one of those contractors - currently asking for hundreds of millions of ADA, with a track record of missed timelines. A contractor asking the community for money does not get to attack the members of that community for doing the exact thing the governance system was built for: participating, voting, and asking questions. Respect for ADA holders is not optional for someone requesting their treasury. It is the job. Screenshots of every quote above are attached. Read them in full, and decide for yourselves.👇👇👇

Holger - Guarding our Vision!

14,668 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 We are repeating 1995 dotcom bubble pattern literally 1:1 Over a decade in markets and I've never seen this many crash indicators flashing at once Start with the biggest one: the IPO wave. Everyone thinks the SpaceX trade is over, but it hasnt even started. Aug 6 will change everything. $SPCX did the largest IPO in history on June 12. $135, $1.77T valuation, $75B raised. Then it ripped to $225 in 4 days and dumped 35% back to $147. The crowd that bought the hype is already underwater. And here's the thing: an IPO is not the start of the run. It's the exit. The day insiders + early backers turn paper into cash. This time they built the buyer out of millions of retail accounts. Fidelity cut its IPO minimum from $500k to $2k, a 99.6% cut. Robinhood, SoFi: no minimum at all. Retail got 30% of the offering when the standard is 5-10%. They dropped every barrier to get u IN. Then bolted the exit: sell in the first 15 days and ur flagged a flipper, with bans escalating up to a lifetime one tied to ur SSN. You dont build a one-way door unless u already know which way the crowd has to run. History shows the ending every time. Truist studied 30 major tech IPOs since 2012: Median year-1 drawdown: -54% Only 43% green 6 months in 11 of 30 fell 64-90% $FB, $SNAP, $UBER, $HOOD: same script. Huge debut, endless hype, lockups expire, early money hands u the bag. Now price SpaceX into that: over 110x sales, $4.9B loss last year, $41.3B accumulated deficit. CFRA rated it a SELL under an hour after open. Morningstar fair value: $63. It trades at $162. And the real distribution event is still ahead: Aug 6. First earnings report = insiders finally unlock 20% of their stock, +10% more if price holds high. At the same time $SPCX enters the Nasdaq-100, so index funds are FORCED to buy it near the top. Forced buyers meeting real sellers. That's the window. Moreover, this is just IPO #1. OpenAI (~$850-900B) and Anthropic (~$965B) already filed. No dates yet, but the window is open and they'll fly through it. 3 of the biggest listings in history, all AI-linked, all landing into the same indexes. Which brings us to what actually holds all of this up: the AI money-loop. $800B+ in circular financing rn: 1/ $NVDA invests in OpenAI 2/ OpenAI signs $300B in cloud deals w/ $ORCL 3/ Oracle buys billions in Nvidia chips to fill them 4/ Nvidia books the revenue, stock pumps, funds more deals Same dollars circling between a handful of names, dressed up as organic demand. The cracks are already showing. OpenAI is on track to lose ~$14B this year. Nvidia's $100B OpenAI deal was reported "on ice". $ORCL dumped 30% in a quarter on fears OpenAI cant pay its bills. Michael Burry, the guy who called 2008, is shorting $NVDA and comparing this to Enron-style vendor financing. And here's how 1 crack becomes a cascade: Microsoft AI revenue disappoints -> cuts Azure spend -> hits Nvidia revenue -> tanks CoreWeave valuation -> chokes OpenAI funding -> Oracle left holding $300B in commitments nobody pays for. Pull 1 card and the whole circle tightens. This is exactly the dotcom script. Back then Nortel and Lucent financed their own customers to fake demand. The loop looked unbreakable, until one link missed a payment. Then the entire thing unwound in months. Insiders rich, retail wrecked. Same in 2021 SPAC mania. Same now, just 10x the size. How to max profit on it? I have an idea... I already made 6 figs shorting SpaceX publicly, posted it all in real time. And I'm not stopping there. Soon I'm sharing my biggest trade ever, confident it makes me millions. Dropping it in my free private group: (btw I'll stop accepting new requests soon, so hurry up) A lot of people are going to wish they joined before the doors close.
0:29

🚨 We are repeating 1995 dotcom bubble pattern literally 1:1 Over a decade in markets and I've never seen this many crash indicators flashing at once Start with the biggest one: the IPO wave. Everyone thinks the SpaceX trade is over, but it hasnt even started. Aug 6 will change everything. $SPCX did the largest IPO in history on June 12. $135, $1.77T valuation, $75B raised. Then it ripped to $225 in 4 days and dumped 35% back to $147. The crowd that bought the hype is already underwater. And here's the thing: an IPO is not the start of the run. It's the exit. The day insiders + early backers turn paper into cash. This time they built the buyer out of millions of retail accounts. Fidelity cut its IPO minimum from $500k to $2k, a 99.6% cut. Robinhood, SoFi: no minimum at all. Retail got 30% of the offering when the standard is 5-10%. They dropped every barrier to get u IN. Then bolted the exit: sell in the first 15 days and ur flagged a flipper, with bans escalating up to a lifetime one tied to ur SSN. You dont build a one-way door unless u already know which way the crowd has to run. History shows the ending every time. Truist studied 30 major tech IPOs since 2012: Median year-1 drawdown: -54% Only 43% green 6 months in 11 of 30 fell 64-90% $FB, $SNAP, $UBER, $HOOD: same script. Huge debut, endless hype, lockups expire, early money hands u the bag. Now price SpaceX into that: over 110x sales, $4.9B loss last year, $41.3B accumulated deficit. CFRA rated it a SELL under an hour after open. Morningstar fair value: $63. It trades at $162. And the real distribution event is still ahead: Aug 6. First earnings report = insiders finally unlock 20% of their stock, +10% more if price holds high. At the same time $SPCX enters the Nasdaq-100, so index funds are FORCED to buy it near the top. Forced buyers meeting real sellers. That's the window. Moreover, this is just IPO #1. OpenAI (~$850-900B) and Anthropic (~$965B) already filed. No dates yet, but the window is open and they'll fly through it. 3 of the biggest listings in history, all AI-linked, all landing into the same indexes. Which brings us to what actually holds all of this up: the AI money-loop. $800B+ in circular financing rn: 1/ $NVDA invests in OpenAI 2/ OpenAI signs $300B in cloud deals w/ $ORCL 3/ Oracle buys billions in Nvidia chips to fill them 4/ Nvidia books the revenue, stock pumps, funds more deals Same dollars circling between a handful of names, dressed up as organic demand. The cracks are already showing. OpenAI is on track to lose ~$14B this year. Nvidia's $100B OpenAI deal was reported "on ice". $ORCL dumped 30% in a quarter on fears OpenAI cant pay its bills. Michael Burry, the guy who called 2008, is shorting $NVDA and comparing this to Enron-style vendor financing. And here's how 1 crack becomes a cascade: Microsoft AI revenue disappoints -> cuts Azure spend -> hits Nvidia revenue -> tanks CoreWeave valuation -> chokes OpenAI funding -> Oracle left holding $300B in commitments nobody pays for. Pull 1 card and the whole circle tightens. This is exactly the dotcom script. Back then Nortel and Lucent financed their own customers to fake demand. The loop looked unbreakable, until one link missed a payment. Then the entire thing unwound in months. Insiders rich, retail wrecked. Same in 2021 SPAC mania. Same now, just 10x the size. How to max profit on it? I have an idea... I already made 6 figs shorting SpaceX publicly, posted it all in real time. And I'm not stopping there. Soon I'm sharing my biggest trade ever, confident it makes me millions. Dropping it in my free private group: (btw I'll stop accepting new requests soon, so hurry up) A lot of people are going to wish they joined before the doors close.

𝗰𝘆𝗰𝗹𝗼𝗽

86,494 次观看 • 1 个月前

you saved up $3,000 to fly out some mid girl in economy while telling yourself you're a player i flew out 5 dubai models in emirates first class last month and it cost me exactly $0 not because i'm rich. because i understand math that you don't let me explain how to turn your business expenses into a harem marketing system that prints money: most dudes are out here sending $500 cashapps for "uber money" to girls who screenshot it and laugh in the group chat. flying them spirit airlines if they're lucky. splitting the fucking holiday inn. acting like they did something meanwhile i'm converting facebook ad spend into first class tickets here's what actually happened. i had $100k in ad spend coming up this quarter. was gonna pay it anyway, money straight to zuckerberg's pocket. instead i put it all on my amex platinum. boom, 150k points instantly plus another 150k from the signup bonus 300k amex points = 3 emirates first class tickets to dubai retail value of those tickets? $45,000 what i actually paid? nothing. zero. fuck all but i didn't fly out one girl. i flew out five when you fly one girl out, she owns you. she's doing you a favor. you're just another trick trying to impress her. but when you fly FIVE girls out? the entire dynamic flips. they're competing for your attention. they're creating content for you. they're selling you without even knowing it the psychology is fucking beautiful. these girls have never been in first class. probably never will be again. fourteen hour flight with champagne and caviar, their own private suite. they're taking 50 instagram stories before the plane even takes off and they're all tagging me girl #1 posted 52 stories from the flight alone. her 30k followers all sliding in asking who the fuck i am. girl #2 made a whole reel about the experience that hit 2.3 million views. the comments are just hundreds of dudes trying to figure out what i do by the time they landed in dubai i had 400+ dm requests here's where shit gets disgusting. they think this is a "brand trip" because i position it as a creator collaboration. technically they're right. they're creating content. i'm collaborating. the brand just happens to be me lmfao five models, seven days in dubai. they're posting from the villa, from the restaurants, from the yacht. every single post tags me. their combined reach? 4.8 million impressions. organic, authentic, impossible to buy those dudes sliding in their dms asking about me? they find my profile. see i teach funding and travel hacking. realize i'm giving away the exact system. they buy my program last dubai trip generated 42 clients at $5k each. that's $210,000 in revenue from a trip that cost me nothing. actually less than nothing because i was gonna spend that money on ads anyway you think this is about girls but you're missing the entire fucking point every expense in your business can be arbitraged. every dollar you spend can work twice. ad spend becomes points. points become experiences. experiences become content. content becomes clients. clients become more ad spend. infinite loop the girls aren't the product, they're the distribution channel and before you get all moral about it, everyone knows what this is. these aren't naive girls getting tricked. they're influencers who want content. i want marketing. we both get what we want. they fly first class to dubai, i get organic reach. capitalism at its finest the funniest shit is when they go back to dating regular dudes. guys taking them to cheesecake factory, splitting the bill, flying them southwest if they're lucky. they're comparing every experience to dubai first class i own real estate in their head forever and it didn't cost me a fucking dollar your favorite guru is doing this. every dude with a lambo is doing this. they just pretend they're above it while running the exact same game difference is i'm telling you exactly how it works q1 miami trip, 7 models, 300k points, resulted in 31 new clients q2 mykonos, 5 models, 250k points, 27 new clients q3 dubai, 5 models, 300k points, 42 new clients q4 planning maldives with 10 models, gonna break the fucking internet this isn't about flexing, it's about understanding leverage. you're trading time for money. i'm trading points for time for money for more points. every dollar does multiple jobs. every expense becomes an asset stop thinking linearly. your ad spend shouldn't just buy ads. your business expenses shouldn't just buy things. everything should compound i learned this from a 55 year old real estate developer who's been flying models to his properties since the 90s. he calls it "animated marketing material" and swears it's the only advertising that actually works he's worth $500m now so maybe the old fuck knows something anyway, keep saving up your pennies to impress one girl who doesn't even like you. keep flying coach. keep wondering why successful dudes seem to have infinite resources or realize that money isn't real, points are infinite, and everything is marketing if you're smart enough to see it the game is rigged but at least now you know the rules ps. if this triggered you, you're thinking too small. this isn't about women. it's about understanding that everything is leverage and nothing costs what you think it does. your competition doesn't know this. that's your advantage. fucking use it
0:23

you saved up $3,000 to fly out some mid girl in economy while telling yourself you're a player i flew out 5 dubai models in emirates first class last month and it cost me exactly $0 not because i'm rich. because i understand math that you don't let me explain how to turn your business expenses into a harem marketing system that prints money: most dudes are out here sending $500 cashapps for "uber money" to girls who screenshot it and laugh in the group chat. flying them spirit airlines if they're lucky. splitting the fucking holiday inn. acting like they did something meanwhile i'm converting facebook ad spend into first class tickets here's what actually happened. i had $100k in ad spend coming up this quarter. was gonna pay it anyway, money straight to zuckerberg's pocket. instead i put it all on my amex platinum. boom, 150k points instantly plus another 150k from the signup bonus 300k amex points = 3 emirates first class tickets to dubai retail value of those tickets? $45,000 what i actually paid? nothing. zero. fuck all but i didn't fly out one girl. i flew out five when you fly one girl out, she owns you. she's doing you a favor. you're just another trick trying to impress her. but when you fly FIVE girls out? the entire dynamic flips. they're competing for your attention. they're creating content for you. they're selling you without even knowing it the psychology is fucking beautiful. these girls have never been in first class. probably never will be again. fourteen hour flight with champagne and caviar, their own private suite. they're taking 50 instagram stories before the plane even takes off and they're all tagging me girl #1 posted 52 stories from the flight alone. her 30k followers all sliding in asking who the fuck i am. girl #2 made a whole reel about the experience that hit 2.3 million views. the comments are just hundreds of dudes trying to figure out what i do by the time they landed in dubai i had 400+ dm requests here's where shit gets disgusting. they think this is a "brand trip" because i position it as a creator collaboration. technically they're right. they're creating content. i'm collaborating. the brand just happens to be me lmfao five models, seven days in dubai. they're posting from the villa, from the restaurants, from the yacht. every single post tags me. their combined reach? 4.8 million impressions. organic, authentic, impossible to buy those dudes sliding in their dms asking about me? they find my profile. see i teach funding and travel hacking. realize i'm giving away the exact system. they buy my program last dubai trip generated 42 clients at $5k each. that's $210,000 in revenue from a trip that cost me nothing. actually less than nothing because i was gonna spend that money on ads anyway you think this is about girls but you're missing the entire fucking point every expense in your business can be arbitraged. every dollar you spend can work twice. ad spend becomes points. points become experiences. experiences become content. content becomes clients. clients become more ad spend. infinite loop the girls aren't the product, they're the distribution channel and before you get all moral about it, everyone knows what this is. these aren't naive girls getting tricked. they're influencers who want content. i want marketing. we both get what we want. they fly first class to dubai, i get organic reach. capitalism at its finest the funniest shit is when they go back to dating regular dudes. guys taking them to cheesecake factory, splitting the bill, flying them southwest if they're lucky. they're comparing every experience to dubai first class i own real estate in their head forever and it didn't cost me a fucking dollar your favorite guru is doing this. every dude with a lambo is doing this. they just pretend they're above it while running the exact same game difference is i'm telling you exactly how it works q1 miami trip, 7 models, 300k points, resulted in 31 new clients q2 mykonos, 5 models, 250k points, 27 new clients q3 dubai, 5 models, 300k points, 42 new clients q4 planning maldives with 10 models, gonna break the fucking internet this isn't about flexing, it's about understanding leverage. you're trading time for money. i'm trading points for time for money for more points. every dollar does multiple jobs. every expense becomes an asset stop thinking linearly. your ad spend shouldn't just buy ads. your business expenses shouldn't just buy things. everything should compound i learned this from a 55 year old real estate developer who's been flying models to his properties since the 90s. he calls it "animated marketing material" and swears it's the only advertising that actually works he's worth $500m now so maybe the old fuck knows something anyway, keep saving up your pennies to impress one girl who doesn't even like you. keep flying coach. keep wondering why successful dudes seem to have infinite resources or realize that money isn't real, points are infinite, and everything is marketing if you're smart enough to see it the game is rigged but at least now you know the rules ps. if this triggered you, you're thinking too small. this isn't about women. it's about understanding that everything is leverage and nothing costs what you think it does. your competition doesn't know this. that's your advantage. fucking use it

hunter

598,115 次观看 • 9 个月前

🏭 The Garden Grove Crisis: Overview The GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California, has been a toxic catastrophe in slow motion. This plant has been processing aerospace components with known hazardous materials — hexavalent chromium, cadmium, and other heavy metals — for decades. The core allegation is that systematic neglect of environmental safety protocols has exposed workers and the surrounding community to dangerous levels of carcinogenic compounds. Hexavalent chromium (the Erin Brockovich chemical) is no joke. It’s a known carcinogen that damages DNA, causes lung cancer, and leaches into groundwater with devastating persistence. The facility’s crisis came to a head with reports of: - Improper waste disposal practices spanning years - Workers reporting chronic health issues consistent with heavy metal exposure - Regulatory inspections found significant violations - Community groundwater contamination concerns - Gavin Newsom’s government turned a blind eye. Was it an appeasement to Xi Jinping and China? 🇬🇧 The Melrose Industries Connection This is where it starts to get ugly from a national security and accountability standpoint. Melrose Industries — a British private equity-style turnaround firm — acquired GKN in a bitterly contested $10 billion hostile takeover in 2018. This was the original GKN, a company founded in 1759 that literally supplied cannons to the British military during the Napoleonic Wars and built Spitfires in WWII. A cornerstone of British industrial heritage, gutted by financial engineers. Melrose’s business model is well-documented and brutally simple: 1. Acquire undervalued industrial companies (often with hostile bids) 2. Slash costs aggressively — R&D, maintenance, environmental compliance, workforce 3. Extract maximum cash flow 4. Sell the stripped-down entity for a profit within 3-5 years They did this with previous acquisitions like Elster Group and Nortek. GKN was just their biggest target. The Garden Grove situation is a textbook case of what happens when a short-term-profit-maximizing financial owner takes over a complex industrial operation with serious legacy environmental liabilities. Environmental compliance, worker safety, and long-term remediation planning are cost centers — exactly the line items that get hollowed out under the Melrose model. 🇨🇳 The China Angle This is where the national security dimension gets genuinely alarming. GKN Aerospace is not some peripheral parts supplier. They manufacture critical components for: - F-35 Lightning II (Lockheed Martin) - F/A-18 Super Hornet (Boeing) - CH-53K King Stallion (Sikorsky) - Multiple commercial aircraft platforms (Airbus A350, Boeing 787) - Engine components for Rolls-Royce, GE, and Pratt & Whitney Now consider the ownership and supply chain structure: Melrose Industries itself is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, but the deeper concern is about where GKN Aerospace's supply chains, joint ventures, and customer relationships extend. GKN Aerospace has: - A significant joint venture in China — GKN Aerospace has partnered with Chinese state-owned and state-linked aerospace entities for years, including work on the COMAC C919 (China's homegrown narrow-body competitor to the 737/A320) - Technology transfer agreements that involve sharing manufacturing processes, material science, and quality control methodologies with Chinese partners - Supply chain integration where Chinese-sourced materials and components flow into GKN's global operations — including potentially into US military supply chains The F-35 connection makes this especially sensitive. GKN produces the F-35’s canopy, among other components. The idea that a British holding company — itself under pressure to maximize returns — might be cutting corners on environmental compliance at a facility that feeds into the most advanced fighter program on the planet, while simultaneously maintaining deep joint venture relationships with Chinese aerospace entities, is the kind of multi-layered security concern that doesn’t get nearly enough attention. How the f*ck is this allowed? 🔥 The Larger Pattern This isn’t just about one facility. The GKN/Melrose situation exemplifies a broader rot in Western defense industrial policy: - Hostile foreign ownership of critical defense suppliers with minimal CFIUS-style scrutiny (because the UK is an "ally") - Financial engineering that prioritizes short-term extraction over long-term capability and safety - Environmental externalization, where cleanup costs get dumped on taxpayers while profits go to London and the Caymans - Technology leakage risks through joint ventures with adversary nations that get treated as routine “commercial” arrangements The Garden Grove toxic crisis is the physical manifestation of this financialization. When you strip out maintenance budgets, defer environmental remediation, and cut compliance staffing to hit quarterly EBITDA targets, you get hexavalent chromium in the groundwater and sick workers. The fact that this is happening at a facility tied to the F-35 supply chain while the parent company’s broader network extends deep into China’s aerospace sector should be setting off every alarm bell in Washington! Instead, Melrose just announced they’re planning to spin off or sell GKN Aerospace in 2025-2026 — the classic “strip, flip, and walk away” endgame, leaving the environmental liabilities for someone else to clean up. It’s a case study in why treating defense industrial base assets as financial instruments rather than strategic capabilities is a slow-motion national security disaster. Now, Newsom and the California Uniparty legislature’s cozy relationship with the CCP should make more sense. 🌐 The China Dimension — Why This Goes Beyond Environmental Crime The joint venture structure is the sleeper issue here: - GKN Aerospace + SAMC (COMAC subsidiary) — Joint venture to manufacture composite horizontal tail planes for the C919, China's direct competitor to the 737 and A320 - GKN Aerospace + AVIC + COMAC — 2020 aerostructures joint venture - 12 manufacturing locations across China, 5,000 employees — Deep integration into China's aerospace ecosystem The concern isn’t just that a British holding company owns a defense supplier. It’s that the same corporate entity simultaneously: - Produces F-35 canopies for the US military - Partners with Chinese state-owned aerospace companies on advanced composite manufacturing - Is apparently cutting corners on maintenance to the point of near-catastrophic failure The intelligence community should be asking: was the deferred maintenance just standard Melrose cost-stripping, or was there any external factor at play? A facility producing military aircraft components that suffers a catastrophic failure — whether accidental or otherwise — is a national security event. Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump Vice President JD Vance JD Vance Treasury Department Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth Department of War 🇺🇸 Office of the ASW for Industrial Base Policy EPA Pacific Southwest Region U.S. EPA OSHA_DOL FBI Armed Services GOP House Armed Services Democrats Oversight Committee Oversight Dems U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Department of Justice @DAGToddBlanche CIA Director John Ratcliffe CIA
1:15

🏭 The Garden Grove Crisis: Overview The GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California, has been a toxic catastrophe in slow motion. This plant has been processing aerospace components with known hazardous materials — hexavalent chromium, cadmium, and other heavy metals — for decades. The core allegation is that systematic neglect of environmental safety protocols has exposed workers and the surrounding community to dangerous levels of carcinogenic compounds. Hexavalent chromium (the Erin Brockovich chemical) is no joke. It’s a known carcinogen that damages DNA, causes lung cancer, and leaches into groundwater with devastating persistence. The facility’s crisis came to a head with reports of: - Improper waste disposal practices spanning years - Workers reporting chronic health issues consistent with heavy metal exposure - Regulatory inspections found significant violations - Community groundwater contamination concerns - Gavin Newsom’s government turned a blind eye. Was it an appeasement to Xi Jinping and China? 🇬🇧 The Melrose Industries Connection This is where it starts to get ugly from a national security and accountability standpoint. Melrose Industries — a British private equity-style turnaround firm — acquired GKN in a bitterly contested $10 billion hostile takeover in 2018. This was the original GKN, a company founded in 1759 that literally supplied cannons to the British military during the Napoleonic Wars and built Spitfires in WWII. A cornerstone of British industrial heritage, gutted by financial engineers. Melrose’s business model is well-documented and brutally simple: 1. Acquire undervalued industrial companies (often with hostile bids) 2. Slash costs aggressively — R&D, maintenance, environmental compliance, workforce 3. Extract maximum cash flow 4. Sell the stripped-down entity for a profit within 3-5 years They did this with previous acquisitions like Elster Group and Nortek. GKN was just their biggest target. The Garden Grove situation is a textbook case of what happens when a short-term-profit-maximizing financial owner takes over a complex industrial operation with serious legacy environmental liabilities. Environmental compliance, worker safety, and long-term remediation planning are cost centers — exactly the line items that get hollowed out under the Melrose model. 🇨🇳 The China Angle This is where the national security dimension gets genuinely alarming. GKN Aerospace is not some peripheral parts supplier. They manufacture critical components for: - F-35 Lightning II (Lockheed Martin) - F/A-18 Super Hornet (Boeing) - CH-53K King Stallion (Sikorsky) - Multiple commercial aircraft platforms (Airbus A350, Boeing 787) - Engine components for Rolls-Royce, GE, and Pratt & Whitney Now consider the ownership and supply chain structure: Melrose Industries itself is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, but the deeper concern is about where GKN Aerospace's supply chains, joint ventures, and customer relationships extend. GKN Aerospace has: - A significant joint venture in China — GKN Aerospace has partnered with Chinese state-owned and state-linked aerospace entities for years, including work on the COMAC C919 (China's homegrown narrow-body competitor to the 737/A320) - Technology transfer agreements that involve sharing manufacturing processes, material science, and quality control methodologies with Chinese partners - Supply chain integration where Chinese-sourced materials and components flow into GKN's global operations — including potentially into US military supply chains The F-35 connection makes this especially sensitive. GKN produces the F-35’s canopy, among other components. The idea that a British holding company — itself under pressure to maximize returns — might be cutting corners on environmental compliance at a facility that feeds into the most advanced fighter program on the planet, while simultaneously maintaining deep joint venture relationships with Chinese aerospace entities, is the kind of multi-layered security concern that doesn’t get nearly enough attention. How the f*ck is this allowed? 🔥 The Larger Pattern This isn’t just about one facility. The GKN/Melrose situation exemplifies a broader rot in Western defense industrial policy: - Hostile foreign ownership of critical defense suppliers with minimal CFIUS-style scrutiny (because the UK is an "ally") - Financial engineering that prioritizes short-term extraction over long-term capability and safety - Environmental externalization, where cleanup costs get dumped on taxpayers while profits go to London and the Caymans - Technology leakage risks through joint ventures with adversary nations that get treated as routine “commercial” arrangements The Garden Grove toxic crisis is the physical manifestation of this financialization. When you strip out maintenance budgets, defer environmental remediation, and cut compliance staffing to hit quarterly EBITDA targets, you get hexavalent chromium in the groundwater and sick workers. The fact that this is happening at a facility tied to the F-35 supply chain while the parent company’s broader network extends deep into China’s aerospace sector should be setting off every alarm bell in Washington! Instead, Melrose just announced they’re planning to spin off or sell GKN Aerospace in 2025-2026 — the classic “strip, flip, and walk away” endgame, leaving the environmental liabilities for someone else to clean up. It’s a case study in why treating defense industrial base assets as financial instruments rather than strategic capabilities is a slow-motion national security disaster. Now, Newsom and the California Uniparty legislature’s cozy relationship with the CCP should make more sense. 🌐 The China Dimension — Why This Goes Beyond Environmental Crime The joint venture structure is the sleeper issue here: - GKN Aerospace + SAMC (COMAC subsidiary) — Joint venture to manufacture composite horizontal tail planes for the C919, China's direct competitor to the 737 and A320 - GKN Aerospace + AVIC + COMAC — 2020 aerostructures joint venture - 12 manufacturing locations across China, 5,000 employees — Deep integration into China's aerospace ecosystem The concern isn’t just that a British holding company owns a defense supplier. It’s that the same corporate entity simultaneously: - Produces F-35 canopies for the US military - Partners with Chinese state-owned aerospace companies on advanced composite manufacturing - Is apparently cutting corners on maintenance to the point of near-catastrophic failure The intelligence community should be asking: was the deferred maintenance just standard Melrose cost-stripping, or was there any external factor at play? A facility producing military aircraft components that suffers a catastrophic failure — whether accidental or otherwise — is a national security event. Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump Vice President JD Vance JD Vance Treasury Department Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth Department of War 🇺🇸 Office of the ASW for Industrial Base Policy EPA Pacific Southwest Region U.S. EPA OSHA_DOL FBI Armed Services GOP House Armed Services Democrats Oversight Committee Oversight Dems U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Department of Justice @DAGToddBlanche CIA Director John Ratcliffe CIA

Tony Seruga

32,911 次观看 • 3 个月前

CHARLIE KIRK, POLITICAL ASS*SSINATIONS, AND THE B'NAI B'RITH (Warning: For Elite Pattern Recognizers Only) Candace Owens ▶️ This is a long post, and won't get very good reach unless you heavily interact with it. Please give it a like, a bookmark, a comment and a retweet. Or else it will just die. 5 minutes to read, 5 minutes to watch the video. But in 10 minutes you'll get an advanced class on B'nai B'rith and ass*ssinations that took me months of research to put together. If you watched Candace Owens yesterday, you learned a little about the B'nai B'rith, a jewish masonic secret society/fraternal order, & its related institution, the ADL. I clocked the ADL 4 days after Charlie Kirk was ass*ssinated. By October 4th, I was openly suspecting them of allegedly playing some kind of role in the hit. But to understand why I suspected to find their involvement, we must review some history. Then we can apply it to Charlie Kirk's ass*ssination. The B'nai B'rith/ADL were materially involved in the JFK, RFK, & MLK ass*ssinations: ▪️JFK▪️ B'nai B'rith member Julius Schepps was President of the Dallas Citizens Council, the organization that invited JFK to Dallas the fateful day of the ass*ssination. It's believed Abraham Zapruder, the jew who captured the infamous footage, was also a member of the B'nai B'rith. Zapruder's office was in the Dal-Tex building (which was next to the Texas School Book Depository) where dozens of witnesses attested that multiple gunshots came from. The Dal-Tex building was owned by the jews David Weisblat and Morris J. Russ until November 1, 1963, when it was transferred to Russ's widow Sylvia Golden Russ just 3 weeks before the ass*ssination. David Weisblat worked for the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith. The ADL. Perhaps to get ahead of things, the B'nai B'rith awarded JFK a presidential Gold Medal on January 31, 1963, while he was mired in a battle with israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion over israel's illicit nuclear program. What better way to deflect blame! "He was our greatest ally!" Sound familiar? ▪️RFK▪️ RFK's Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz, was the Civil Rights Director for the western branch of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. The ADL. It was Mankiewicz who diverted RFK from exiting out the ballroom of the Ambassador Hotel as planned and into the kitchen where Sirhan Sirhan & Thane Eugene Cesar were waiting to shoot him. At the time, the Ambassador Hotel was owned by the jew Junius Myer Schine, who once upon a time allowed the jewish gangster Mickey Cohen to operate an illegal casino inside the hotel. Mickey Cohen had a famous stripper girlfriend named Candy Barr whom he notoriously shared with JACK RUBY and jewish terrorist/israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin (Begin was leader of the Irgun & mastermind of the King David Hotel bombing in 1946. He also founded the Likud, the party that Netanyahu is a member of, which is currently running israel). RFK's DOJ had previously sent Mickey Cohen to prison for 15 years, after RFK personally grilled Cohen in televised senate hearings. BONUS: Junius Schine's son David was mentored by the homosexual jewish fixer Roy Cohn, and they both made the cover of Time Magazine for their central role in the famous Army-McCarthy senate hearings. David would go on to marry Miss Universe 1955, Hillevi Rombin of Sweden (I'll note that the Miss Universe Pageant was owned by jews at the time). Later, Roy Cohn would mentor another young man in the New York real estate scene named Donald J. Trump. Trump would later buy the Ambassador Hotel AND the Miss Universe Pageant! (Try not to notice the intersection between pageants, modeling, and the so-called Epstein network. But, I digress. Lol). ▪️MLK▪️ The ADL had of course been a long-time partner and ally with MLK in the Civil Rights movement. However, according to Henry Schwarzschild—who worked in the ADL’s publications department from 1962 to 1964—the ADL monitored (spied on) King because it considered him a "loose cannon", and the ADL periodically passed information on King to the FBI. Schwarzschild alleged this was “common and casually accepted knowledge” within the ADL. Later, MLK & his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was targeted by the FBI's infamous COINTELPRO. During that entire era, the ADL was known to collaborate closely with the FBI, just as they do now. For years, the ADL has trained every FBI agent. But there's an even deeper & more specific connection between the ADL and the MLK assassination. James Earl Ray's handler Raul once gave Ray an "emergency phone number" of sorts. Raul was a known business associate of Jack Ruby—why does he keep popping up? Raul was also involved in an illegal arms trafficking operation smuggling weapons to israel. This phone number Raul gave a Ray was to Samuel Laventhal, owner of Marine Supply and Salvage Co. of New Orleans. Laventhal was a member of the B'nai B'rith & Zionist Organization of America. In the initial appeal of his conviction, Ray reported that Laventhal was "distressed" about MLK's forthcoming public support for Palestine. Later, in 1978, Ray testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations that someone in MLK's organization had made contact with the Palestinians about a potential alliance, and that King "intended to support the Arab cause." MLK had already famously 'left the pro-israel cause' when he canceled his much-publicized trip to israel scheduled for November 1967. MLK had soured on israel after its aggression in the 6-Day War placed him in a difficult political position with the 3rd world, with whom he was building a coalition. It was sometime after King's israel trip cancelation that Ray learned from Laventhal of MLK's allegiance switch (Remember, the ADL of the B'nai B'rith was spying on MLK & his organization). But before an alliance with Palestine could be worked out & publicly announced, King was murdered on April 4, 1968, and Ray was framed as the lone gunman patsy. We should note that the cover alias James Earl Ray somehow obtained and assumed while he was on the run was Eric S. Galt, a man who had national security clearance and was the manager of a Union Carbide plant manufacturing proximity bomb fuses being illegally smuggled to israel. Very weird! BACK TO CHARLIE KIRK Knowing this information, and having already noted many troubling similarities between Charlie's ass*ssination and the 3 ass*ssinations mentioned above, I was on the lookout for signs of ADL involvement. The B'nai B'rith is an underground network (literally) that could theoretically facilitate surreptitious planning, collaboration and coordination. Allegedly. I've written extensively about the battle Charlie was waging against the ADL since he joined us in September 2023 calling to #BanTheADL. Search my timeline for "Charlie AND ADL" For its part, the ADL had included TPUSA in its infamous "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." Charlie called to ban the ADL multiple times in September 2023. He called it an anti-White hate group. In November 2023, he declared the ADL was "part and parcel with Black Lives Matter" and "went all in on woke." He included them as one of the Left-wing jewish groups that was pushing the radical open borders and quasi-marxist policies ruining America. At the same time that Charlie was attacking the ADL in the fall of 2023, the ADL was on record proclaiming that America had a GenZ/TikTok problem regarding support for israel, and it launched a set of major initiatives to help reclaim America's youth. Many of these initiatives centered on college campuses and social media—two arenas dominated by Charlie Kirk. After Charlie's ass*ssination, the ADL published a hit piece on people alleging that israel was behind Charlie's murder. Their "Glossary On Extremism & Hate" began to circulate online and they were pressured to shut it down, which they did on September 30th, 2025. In early October, Kash Patel piled on, announcing that the FBI would be severing its longstanding ties with the ADL. (I've seen little evidence for this actually happening, btw). He also announced an end to the FBI's partnership with the SPLC, another radical jewish organization that had been attacking Charlie and TPUSA. It was at that point that a most curious thing happened: on October 3rd, Marissa Streit, former member of IDF Unit 8200 & CEO of PragerU, attacked the ADL & SPLC—which I clocked at time as being kosher theater. We should also note that according to Ben Shapiro, the Daily Wire shared space, talent and equipment with PragerU when both organizations were in their infancy. This will soon become more important in our story. Here's what I think was (allegedly) happening: the Conspirators were using the ADL and its adversarial relationship to TPUSA & Charlie Kirk to help cement the narrative that Charlie was murdered because of radical Leftist hate. That's why the ADL took down its "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." That's why Kash Patel publicly distanced the FBI from the ADL. And that's why fellow jewish intelligence operative Marissa Streit denounced it the ADL. But that's just one interpretation of the facts and I'm not accusing anyone specifically of a crime. Do your own research and make up your own mind. Right after that, on October 4th, 2025, Candace Owens found out that Kash Patel had flown in the agents from the FBI's Connecticut Office to "investigate" at UVU. That's the FBI office that shares building space with the ADL. At that point, I'd seen enough, and I started publicly airing my initially private hypothesis that the ADL was likely materially involved with Charlie's ass*ssination. But my tenuous alleged hypothesis was strengthened yesterday when we found out that Ben Shapiro was having a breakfast/lunch meeting with the Gary Javitch—Former Executive Director of B'nai B'rith International & former president of the Henry Monsky Lodge of the B'nai B'rith & member of the ADL—when Ben found out about the hit on Charlie almost right away. Within about 5 minutes or less, Ben's IDF security team was on the phone with someone in Charlie's SUV while it sped Charlie to the hospital. Mind-boggingly weird & dumbfounding. I'm not making any accusations of guilt, I want to be very clear about that. But this is a troubling set of facts and patterns that I believe looks like more than a coincidence. Why the heck would the security team of a long-time enemy to Charlie be on phone with Charlie's security team as it raced Charlie to the hospital? And while Shapiro just happened to be in a meeting with a high-level member of the ADL & the B'nai B'rith?! What. Are. The. Odds? And let's not forget that after months without any interaction, and knowing that Charlie saw Ben Shapiro as an adversary, Andrew Kolvet booked Shapiro as Charlie's guest the day before Charlie was assassinated. The same day Charlie proclaimed that he was leaving the pro-israel cause. The same day that Charlie likely had a Zoom struggle session with Rabbi Wolicki and Josh Hammer (who is a close friend of Ben Shapiro). The same day that Charlie texted multiple people the cryptic 'they're going to kill me.' And then within a week, Ben was hosting the Charlie Kirk Show and proclaiming he'd pick up the bloody mic? I'm sorry, but given all this context I've painstakingly recounted, am I the only one who thinks we deserve an explanation? WTF, Shapiro? ▪️Like, retweet, reply, bookmark▪️
5:40

CHARLIE KIRK, POLITICAL ASS*SSINATIONS, AND THE B'NAI B'RITH (Warning: For Elite Pattern Recognizers Only) Candace Owens ▶️ This is a long post, and won't get very good reach unless you heavily interact with it. Please give it a like, a bookmark, a comment and a retweet. Or else it will just die. 5 minutes to read, 5 minutes to watch the video. But in 10 minutes you'll get an advanced class on B'nai B'rith and ass*ssinations that took me months of research to put together. If you watched Candace Owens yesterday, you learned a little about the B'nai B'rith, a jewish masonic secret society/fraternal order, & its related institution, the ADL. I clocked the ADL 4 days after Charlie Kirk was ass*ssinated. By October 4th, I was openly suspecting them of allegedly playing some kind of role in the hit. But to understand why I suspected to find their involvement, we must review some history. Then we can apply it to Charlie Kirk's ass*ssination. The B'nai B'rith/ADL were materially involved in the JFK, RFK, & MLK ass*ssinations: ▪️JFK▪️ B'nai B'rith member Julius Schepps was President of the Dallas Citizens Council, the organization that invited JFK to Dallas the fateful day of the ass*ssination. It's believed Abraham Zapruder, the jew who captured the infamous footage, was also a member of the B'nai B'rith. Zapruder's office was in the Dal-Tex building (which was next to the Texas School Book Depository) where dozens of witnesses attested that multiple gunshots came from. The Dal-Tex building was owned by the jews David Weisblat and Morris J. Russ until November 1, 1963, when it was transferred to Russ's widow Sylvia Golden Russ just 3 weeks before the ass*ssination. David Weisblat worked for the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith. The ADL. Perhaps to get ahead of things, the B'nai B'rith awarded JFK a presidential Gold Medal on January 31, 1963, while he was mired in a battle with israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion over israel's illicit nuclear program. What better way to deflect blame! "He was our greatest ally!" Sound familiar? ▪️RFK▪️ RFK's Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz, was the Civil Rights Director for the western branch of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. The ADL. It was Mankiewicz who diverted RFK from exiting out the ballroom of the Ambassador Hotel as planned and into the kitchen where Sirhan Sirhan & Thane Eugene Cesar were waiting to shoot him. At the time, the Ambassador Hotel was owned by the jew Junius Myer Schine, who once upon a time allowed the jewish gangster Mickey Cohen to operate an illegal casino inside the hotel. Mickey Cohen had a famous stripper girlfriend named Candy Barr whom he notoriously shared with JACK RUBY and jewish terrorist/israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin (Begin was leader of the Irgun & mastermind of the King David Hotel bombing in 1946. He also founded the Likud, the party that Netanyahu is a member of, which is currently running israel). RFK's DOJ had previously sent Mickey Cohen to prison for 15 years, after RFK personally grilled Cohen in televised senate hearings. BONUS: Junius Schine's son David was mentored by the homosexual jewish fixer Roy Cohn, and they both made the cover of Time Magazine for their central role in the famous Army-McCarthy senate hearings. David would go on to marry Miss Universe 1955, Hillevi Rombin of Sweden (I'll note that the Miss Universe Pageant was owned by jews at the time). Later, Roy Cohn would mentor another young man in the New York real estate scene named Donald J. Trump. Trump would later buy the Ambassador Hotel AND the Miss Universe Pageant! (Try not to notice the intersection between pageants, modeling, and the so-called Epstein network. But, I digress. Lol). ▪️MLK▪️ The ADL had of course been a long-time partner and ally with MLK in the Civil Rights movement. However, according to Henry Schwarzschild—who worked in the ADL’s publications department from 1962 to 1964—the ADL monitored (spied on) King because it considered him a "loose cannon", and the ADL periodically passed information on King to the FBI. Schwarzschild alleged this was “common and casually accepted knowledge” within the ADL. Later, MLK & his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was targeted by the FBI's infamous COINTELPRO. During that entire era, the ADL was known to collaborate closely with the FBI, just as they do now. For years, the ADL has trained every FBI agent. But there's an even deeper & more specific connection between the ADL and the MLK assassination. James Earl Ray's handler Raul once gave Ray an "emergency phone number" of sorts. Raul was a known business associate of Jack Ruby—why does he keep popping up? Raul was also involved in an illegal arms trafficking operation smuggling weapons to israel. This phone number Raul gave a Ray was to Samuel Laventhal, owner of Marine Supply and Salvage Co. of New Orleans. Laventhal was a member of the B'nai B'rith & Zionist Organization of America. In the initial appeal of his conviction, Ray reported that Laventhal was "distressed" about MLK's forthcoming public support for Palestine. Later, in 1978, Ray testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations that someone in MLK's organization had made contact with the Palestinians about a potential alliance, and that King "intended to support the Arab cause." MLK had already famously 'left the pro-israel cause' when he canceled his much-publicized trip to israel scheduled for November 1967. MLK had soured on israel after its aggression in the 6-Day War placed him in a difficult political position with the 3rd world, with whom he was building a coalition. It was sometime after King's israel trip cancelation that Ray learned from Laventhal of MLK's allegiance switch (Remember, the ADL of the B'nai B'rith was spying on MLK & his organization). But before an alliance with Palestine could be worked out & publicly announced, King was murdered on April 4, 1968, and Ray was framed as the lone gunman patsy. We should note that the cover alias James Earl Ray somehow obtained and assumed while he was on the run was Eric S. Galt, a man who had national security clearance and was the manager of a Union Carbide plant manufacturing proximity bomb fuses being illegally smuggled to israel. Very weird! BACK TO CHARLIE KIRK Knowing this information, and having already noted many troubling similarities between Charlie's ass*ssination and the 3 ass*ssinations mentioned above, I was on the lookout for signs of ADL involvement. The B'nai B'rith is an underground network (literally) that could theoretically facilitate surreptitious planning, collaboration and coordination. Allegedly. I've written extensively about the battle Charlie was waging against the ADL since he joined us in September 2023 calling to #BanTheADL. Search my timeline for "Charlie AND ADL" For its part, the ADL had included TPUSA in its infamous "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." Charlie called to ban the ADL multiple times in September 2023. He called it an anti-White hate group. In November 2023, he declared the ADL was "part and parcel with Black Lives Matter" and "went all in on woke." He included them as one of the Left-wing jewish groups that was pushing the radical open borders and quasi-marxist policies ruining America. At the same time that Charlie was attacking the ADL in the fall of 2023, the ADL was on record proclaiming that America had a GenZ/TikTok problem regarding support for israel, and it launched a set of major initiatives to help reclaim America's youth. Many of these initiatives centered on college campuses and social media—two arenas dominated by Charlie Kirk. After Charlie's ass*ssination, the ADL published a hit piece on people alleging that israel was behind Charlie's murder. Their "Glossary On Extremism & Hate" began to circulate online and they were pressured to shut it down, which they did on September 30th, 2025. In early October, Kash Patel piled on, announcing that the FBI would be severing its longstanding ties with the ADL. (I've seen little evidence for this actually happening, btw). He also announced an end to the FBI's partnership with the SPLC, another radical jewish organization that had been attacking Charlie and TPUSA. It was at that point that a most curious thing happened: on October 3rd, Marissa Streit, former member of IDF Unit 8200 & CEO of PragerU, attacked the ADL & SPLC—which I clocked at time as being kosher theater. We should also note that according to Ben Shapiro, the Daily Wire shared space, talent and equipment with PragerU when both organizations were in their infancy. This will soon become more important in our story. Here's what I think was (allegedly) happening: the Conspirators were using the ADL and its adversarial relationship to TPUSA & Charlie Kirk to help cement the narrative that Charlie was murdered because of radical Leftist hate. That's why the ADL took down its "Glossary On Extremism & Hate." That's why Kash Patel publicly distanced the FBI from the ADL. And that's why fellow jewish intelligence operative Marissa Streit denounced it the ADL. But that's just one interpretation of the facts and I'm not accusing anyone specifically of a crime. Do your own research and make up your own mind. Right after that, on October 4th, 2025, Candace Owens found out that Kash Patel had flown in the agents from the FBI's Connecticut Office to "investigate" at UVU. That's the FBI office that shares building space with the ADL. At that point, I'd seen enough, and I started publicly airing my initially private hypothesis that the ADL was likely materially involved with Charlie's ass*ssination. But my tenuous alleged hypothesis was strengthened yesterday when we found out that Ben Shapiro was having a breakfast/lunch meeting with the Gary Javitch—Former Executive Director of B'nai B'rith International & former president of the Henry Monsky Lodge of the B'nai B'rith & member of the ADL—when Ben found out about the hit on Charlie almost right away. Within about 5 minutes or less, Ben's IDF security team was on the phone with someone in Charlie's SUV while it sped Charlie to the hospital. Mind-boggingly weird & dumbfounding. I'm not making any accusations of guilt, I want to be very clear about that. But this is a troubling set of facts and patterns that I believe looks like more than a coincidence. Why the heck would the security team of a long-time enemy to Charlie be on phone with Charlie's security team as it raced Charlie to the hospital? And while Shapiro just happened to be in a meeting with a high-level member of the ADL & the B'nai B'rith?! What. Are. The. Odds? And let's not forget that after months without any interaction, and knowing that Charlie saw Ben Shapiro as an adversary, Andrew Kolvet booked Shapiro as Charlie's guest the day before Charlie was assassinated. The same day Charlie proclaimed that he was leaving the pro-israel cause. The same day that Charlie likely had a Zoom struggle session with Rabbi Wolicki and Josh Hammer (who is a close friend of Ben Shapiro). The same day that Charlie texted multiple people the cryptic 'they're going to kill me.' And then within a week, Ben was hosting the Charlie Kirk Show and proclaiming he'd pick up the bloody mic? I'm sorry, but given all this context I've painstakingly recounted, am I the only one who thinks we deserve an explanation? WTF, Shapiro? ▪️Like, retweet, reply, bookmark▪️

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

138,914 次观看 • 1 个月前