Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

“Private property rights are fundamental, this government will always protect them, this government fundamentally disagrees with the B.C. Supreme Court Cowichan decision.”

Steve Saretsky

68,665 subscribers

81,868 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

While in Kelowna today, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre sounded the alarm on the B.C. Supreme Court Cowichan decision: "Judges better realize the massive irreparable damage that they will do to the future of this country if they undermine property rights."

While in Kelowna today, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre sounded the alarm on the B.C. Supreme Court Cowichan decision: "Judges better realize the massive irreparable damage that they will do to the future of this country if they undermine property rights."

Juno News

74,864 views • 9 months ago

HAPPENING NOW: NDP Premier David Eby admits he "shares the concerns" expressed by Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie over the B.C. Supreme Court's Cowichan decision impacting private property rights in the province.

HAPPENING NOW: NDP Premier David Eby admits he "shares the concerns" expressed by Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie over the B.C. Supreme Court's Cowichan decision impacting private property rights in the province.

Alexander Zoltan

105,189 views • 9 months ago

Poilievre slams the Liberals for a "land grab" threatening private property over a high-speed rail project, pledging Conservatives will restore protections: "Property rights are human rights." He points to B.C.'s Cowichan decision as proof property isn't safe under the Liberals.

Poilievre slams the Liberals for a "land grab" threatening private property over a high-speed rail project, pledging Conservatives will restore protections: "Property rights are human rights." He points to B.C.'s Cowichan decision as proof property isn't safe under the Liberals.

Juno News

94,309 views • 4 months ago

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.

Steve Kooner MLA

10,167 views • 7 months ago

The US Marshals were instructed NOT to arrest people protesting outside of the Supreme Court Justices’ homes. This was a political decision because the Biden admin disagrees with the Dobbs’ decision. Once again – we are seeing the hyper-partisanship from federal government.

The US Marshals were instructed NOT to arrest people protesting outside of the Supreme Court Justices’ homes. This was a political decision because the Biden admin disagrees with the Dobbs’ decision. Once again – we are seeing the hyper-partisanship from federal government.

Senator Ted Cruz

186,577 views • 3 years ago

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 🦅⚖️🇨🇦⏬ : Mark Carney openly admits private property rights are at risk in the Cowichan land title court ruling the Federal, Provincial & Civic governments lost. All three levels of government never argued for private property owners during the initial case. Which means private property rights can't be used as an argument during the appeal of the ruling. Mark Carney goes on to say the Liberal government appealed the decision immediately with other First Nation groups. What he didn't say is some of those First Nation groups have overlapping land title claims against the Cowichan claims. So not only are private property rights at risk, it could be decades for court cases to decide which FN bands own title over land.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 🦅⚖️🇨🇦⏬ : Mark Carney openly admits private property rights are at risk in the Cowichan land title court ruling the Federal, Provincial & Civic governments lost. All three levels of government never argued for private property owners during the initial case. Which means private property rights can't be used as an argument during the appeal of the ruling. Mark Carney goes on to say the Liberal government appealed the decision immediately with other First Nation groups. What he didn't say is some of those First Nation groups have overlapping land title claims against the Cowichan claims. So not only are private property rights at risk, it could be decades for court cases to decide which FN bands own title over land.

Bruce McGonigal

21,508 views • 3 months ago

Poilievre on the Cowichan Tribes ruling: "A B.C. Supreme Court judge declared that Aboriginal title includes private property—covering 800 acres in Richmond valued over $1B." He warns broader claims could cover up to 12,500 km², with 95% of B.C. considered unceded land.

Poilievre on the Cowichan Tribes ruling: "A B.C. Supreme Court judge declared that Aboriginal title includes private property—covering 800 acres in Richmond valued over $1B." He warns broader claims could cover up to 12,500 km², with 95% of B.C. considered unceded land.

Juno News

38,394 views • 4 months ago

🦅🏡 : David Eby downplays the Cowichan land title ruling by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, saying it affects 150 private property owners. Does anyone believe these land title challenges will end with the Richmond Cowichan claim?

🦅🏡 : David Eby downplays the Cowichan land title ruling by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, saying it affects 150 private property owners. Does anyone believe these land title challenges will end with the Richmond Cowichan claim?

Bruce McGonigal

29,011 views • 9 months ago

SHOCKING TAKEOVER: DRIPA & Secret Agreements Are STEALING Private Property Homes RIGHT NOW!! A First Nation on British Columbia's central coast is asserting ownership over privately held lands, basing its legal challenge on a landmark ruling from last summer's B.C. Supreme Court decision that paved the way for Indigenous title claims against private property. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth explains how the BC NDP government, under Premier David Eby, is systematically stripping away your private property rights with Indigenous claims that now override the property you sweated for, saved for, built your dreams on, and thought was yours forever.

SHOCKING TAKEOVER: DRIPA & Secret Agreements Are STEALING Private Property Homes RIGHT NOW!! A First Nation on British Columbia's central coast is asserting ownership over privately held lands, basing its legal challenge on a landmark ruling from last summer's B.C. Supreme Court decision that paved the way for Indigenous title claims against private property. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth explains how the BC NDP government, under Premier David Eby, is systematically stripping away your private property rights with Indigenous claims that now override the property you sweated for, saved for, built your dreams on, and thought was yours forever.

Dan Dicks

14,874 views • 6 months ago

Conservatives keep trafficking in misinformation for political gain, no matter the cost. No Canadian has ever lost private property due to a modern treaty. We’ll keep defending property rights and fighting the Cowichan decision in court, where these discussions belong.

Conservatives keep trafficking in misinformation for political gain, no matter the cost. No Canadian has ever lost private property due to a modern treaty. We’ll keep defending property rights and fighting the Cowichan decision in court, where these discussions belong.

Taleeb Noormohamed 🇨🇦

12,665 views • 2 months ago

David Eby tried to dismiss Pierre Poilievre’s visit to Richmond as just a YouTube clip. That’s the kind of arrogance British Columbians have come to expect from this NDP government. Pierre was in Richmond announcing a real plan to protect private property rights and that’s something homeowners are deeply concerned about. Instead of listening, the NDP mocks British Columbians and calls their concerns “fear-mongering” simply because Conservatives are standing up with solutions. Private property rights are fundamental. They must be protected at the highest level. It’s time this provincial government started governing for all British Columbians.

David Eby tried to dismiss Pierre Poilievre’s visit to Richmond as just a YouTube clip. That’s the kind of arrogance British Columbians have come to expect from this NDP government. Pierre was in Richmond announcing a real plan to protect private property rights and that’s something homeowners are deeply concerned about. Instead of listening, the NDP mocks British Columbians and calls their concerns “fear-mongering” simply because Conservatives are standing up with solutions. Private property rights are fundamental. They must be protected at the highest level. It’s time this provincial government started governing for all British Columbians.

Steve Kooner MLA

16,111 views • 4 months ago

The supreme court classify U.S. citizens as property of the federal government 🤔

The supreme court classify U.S. citizens as property of the federal government 🤔

mrredpillz jokaqarmy

16,365 views • 7 months ago

Mark Carney’s Liberal government failed to defend private property rights, putting property owners at risk. Conservatives are fighting to make sure your home, your property, always comes first:

Mark Carney’s Liberal government failed to defend private property rights, putting property owners at risk. Conservatives are fighting to make sure your home, your property, always comes first:

Pierre Poilievre

39,671 views • 1 month ago

The vote to protect private property rights and homeowners in B.C. and across Canada is RIGHT NOW. Sign to defend your home and your property:

The vote to protect private property rights and homeowners in B.C. and across Canada is RIGHT NOW. Sign to defend your home and your property:

Pierre Poilievre

54,625 views • 2 months ago

When will the Scottish Government accept the Supreme Court ruling and act to protect the safety and dignity of female prisoners, so they are not housed with male-bodied prisoners? I put this question to the First Minister at FMQs.

When will the Scottish Government accept the Supreme Court ruling and act to protect the safety and dignity of female prisoners, so they are not housed with male-bodied prisoners? I put this question to the First Minister at FMQs.

Pauline McNeill MSP

14,268 views • 7 months ago

Great breakdown of private property rights in BC and the uncertainty now surrounding them. 1⃣ Constitutionally, First Nations can only sell reserve land to the federal government — they cannot transfer it directly to non-FN Canadians 2⃣ The Musqueam transfer includes private property within the affected lands 3⃣ The transfer covers both federal and provincial lands 4⃣ The Cowichan tribes could potentially take full possession of lands in Richmond 5⃣In the Cowichan case, the court ruled that the Land Title Act does not apply

Great breakdown of private property rights in BC and the uncertainty now surrounding them. 1⃣ Constitutionally, First Nations can only sell reserve land to the federal government — they cannot transfer it directly to non-FN Canadians 2⃣ The Musqueam transfer includes private property within the affected lands 3⃣ The transfer covers both federal and provincial lands 4⃣ The Cowichan tribes could potentially take full possession of lands in Richmond 5⃣In the Cowichan case, the court ruled that the Land Title Act does not apply

Peyman Askari

26,868 views • 5 months ago

This Supreme Court just gutted the Voting Rights Act, opening the door to more racial gerrymandering. This is unacceptable, and Congress must act to protect it. If the Court won’t protect one of our most fundamental rights, we need a new Voting Rights Act strong enough to stop politicians from picking their voters and silencing communities of color.

This Supreme Court just gutted the Voting Rights Act, opening the door to more racial gerrymandering. This is unacceptable, and Congress must act to protect it. If the Court won’t protect one of our most fundamental rights, we need a new Voting Rights Act strong enough to stop politicians from picking their voters and silencing communities of color.

Colin Allred

15,878 views • 3 months ago

It's been SIX MONTHS since the Supreme Court ruled that sex means biological sex. And yet, what has the Government done since then to protect women’s rights? Now they plan to kick the can even further down the road. This Government is letting women down.

It's been SIX MONTHS since the Supreme Court ruled that sex means biological sex. And yet, what has the Government done since then to protect women’s rights? Now they plan to kick the can even further down the road. This Government is letting women down.

Claire Coutinho

537,009 views • 9 months ago

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : BC Premier David Eby implies the BC Supreme Court lied to him about ensuring private property would not be on the table in the Cowichan land treaty decision and admits it’s causing great uncertainty. Eby then says people are still able to sell their property but admits the court decision has likely impacted their property value. David also says he doesn’t know if people are having difficulty getting loans for their property, since the decision. How does he not know? Isn't the answer a simple phone call away?

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : BC Premier David Eby implies the BC Supreme Court lied to him about ensuring private property would not be on the table in the Cowichan land treaty decision and admits it’s causing great uncertainty. Eby then says people are still able to sell their property but admits the court decision has likely impacted their property value. David also says he doesn’t know if people are having difficulty getting loans for their property, since the decision. How does he not know? Isn't the answer a simple phone call away?

Bruce McGonigal

326,287 views • 9 months ago

The BC Supreme Court’s radical Cowichan decision threatens private property across BC. It’s where the NDP’s land acknowledgements, embrace of UNDRIP, ‘uninvited guests’ language, undemocratic land use policies & problematic Haida title recognition were always going to lead.

The BC Supreme Court’s radical Cowichan decision threatens private property across BC. It’s where the NDP’s land acknowledgements, embrace of UNDRIP, ‘uninvited guests’ language, undemocratic land use policies & problematic Haida title recognition were always going to lead.

Caroline Elliott

111,697 views • 1 year ago