Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Probability: “1 in 7 quintillion” Following the September 11 terrorist attacks, Larry Silverstein -through his company and World Trade Center Properties LLC-received a total of approximately $4.65 billion across multiple massive legal battles. He also missed work that day. 1. The Insurance Companies ($4.55 Billion) Silverstein originally held a...

truthtroll_X's profile picture

Truth Troll Official™️

143,034 subscribers

91,099 просмотров • 21 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНовости и политикаФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Larry Silverstein had insurance that covered terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers. After acquiring a 99yr lease on WTC in July 2001 policy included $3.5 billion coverage, he argued 2 double to $7 billion as two separate planes hit the towers The policy, finalized just b4 9/11
2:13

Larry Silverstein had insurance that covered terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers. After acquiring a 99yr lease on WTC in July 2001 policy included $3.5 billion coverage, he argued 2 double to $7 billion as two separate planes hit the towers The policy, finalized just b4 9/11

Meidas_Charise Lee

17,871 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 Larry Silverstein owns the US Bank Tower in Los Angeles and now we are hearing reports of possible drone terror attacks in California Just two months before 9/11, the World Trade Center was sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein ate breakfast on the 91st floor of the North Tower every single morning, except on 9/11 when his wife scheduled a doctor's appointment for him which he recounts below. Larry Silverstein's companies received $4.5 billion in insurance after 9/11.
4:06

🚨 Larry Silverstein owns the US Bank Tower in Los Angeles and now we are hearing reports of possible drone terror attacks in California Just two months before 9/11, the World Trade Center was sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein ate breakfast on the 91st floor of the North Tower every single morning, except on 9/11 when his wife scheduled a doctor's appointment for him which he recounts below. Larry Silverstein's companies received $4.5 billion in insurance after 9/11.

Red Panda Koala

4,179,295 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 Larry Silverstein owns the US Bank Tower in Los Angeles and now we are hearing reports of possible drone terror attacks in California Just two months before 9/11, the World Trade Center was sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein ate breakfast on the 91st floor of the North Tower every single morning. Except on 9/11. Conveniently, his wife made him an emergency doctor's appointment that day. Larry Silverstein's companies received $4.5 billion in insurance after 9/11.
2:26

🚨 Larry Silverstein owns the US Bank Tower in Los Angeles and now we are hearing reports of possible drone terror attacks in California Just two months before 9/11, the World Trade Center was sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein ate breakfast on the 91st floor of the North Tower every single morning. Except on 9/11. Conveniently, his wife made him an emergency doctor's appointment that day. Larry Silverstein's companies received $4.5 billion in insurance after 9/11.

Red Panda Koala

1,671,445 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This guy claims Larry Silverstein is both the dumbest and luckiest businessman. - 6 weeks before 9/11 he gets the lease for the Twin Towers. They only require $1.5 billion in insurance but he takes out over $3.5 billion of insurance. - He never misses work and just happened to miss that day. You all think this is a coincidence or do you think he knew something?
2:00

This guy claims Larry Silverstein is both the dumbest and luckiest businessman. - 6 weeks before 9/11 he gets the lease for the Twin Towers. They only require $1.5 billion in insurance but he takes out over $3.5 billion of insurance. - He never misses work and just happened to miss that day. You all think this is a coincidence or do you think he knew something?

Derrick Evans

29,759 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Only 2 months before 9/11, the World Trade Center was privatized & sold to Larry Silverstein. Every single morning he ate breakfast in North Tower on the 91st floor, but not on 9/11, his wife made him an emergency doctors appointment that day. He also had bought an insurance plan that 'fortunately' covered terrorism. After the attack, he took the insurance company to court. Silverstein won & was paid double, being awarded a total of $4.55B. This may be the largest insurance fraud in history & he is still a free man.
2:32

Only 2 months before 9/11, the World Trade Center was privatized & sold to Larry Silverstein. Every single morning he ate breakfast in North Tower on the 91st floor, but not on 9/11, his wife made him an emergency doctors appointment that day. He also had bought an insurance plan that 'fortunately' covered terrorism. After the attack, he took the insurance company to court. Silverstein won & was paid double, being awarded a total of $4.55B. This may be the largest insurance fraud in history & he is still a free man.

illuminatibot

8,388,201 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This is actually insane. Only TWO MONTHS before 9/11, the World Trade Center was privatized & sold to Larry Silverstein. Every single morning he ate breakfast in North Tower on the 91st floor, BUT NOT ON 9/11, his wife made him an “emergency doctors appointment” that day. He also had conveniently bought an insurance plan that covered terrørism… After the attack, he took the insurance company to court. Silverstein won & was paid double, being awarded a total of $4.55B. He is still a free man and an Israeli hero.
2:32

This is actually insane. Only TWO MONTHS before 9/11, the World Trade Center was privatized & sold to Larry Silverstein. Every single morning he ate breakfast in North Tower on the 91st floor, BUT NOT ON 9/11, his wife made him an “emergency doctors appointment” that day. He also had conveniently bought an insurance plan that covered terrørism… After the attack, he took the insurance company to court. Silverstein won & was paid double, being awarded a total of $4.55B. He is still a free man and an Israeli hero.

Adam

2,263,042 просмотров • 1 год назад

[RG911Team] “Lucky” Larry Silverstein might be worried about our upcoming 9/11 event in NYC. Here are 10 reasons why: 1) Larry signed the lease for the entire World Trade Center complex on July 24, 2001, 6 weeks before the attacks. Mandated asbestos removal from the towers was estimated to cost up to $1 billion. 2) Larry purchased terrorism insurance on the Twin Towers, which enabled him to obtain a $4.55 billion payout on his $14 million lease investment. 3) Multiple Twin Towers tenants reported unusual power downs across the Twin Towers on the weekend before 9/11, which took all electronic surveillance and security systems offline, allowing people to enter secure areas undetected. 4) Larry Silverstein claimed he survived 9/11 because he skipped his daily breakfast in the Twin Towers due to a dermatology appointment. 5) Commerce Secretary (and Silverstein business partner) Howard Lutnick, who was the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, claimed he survived 9/11 because he was running late from taking one of his children to his first day of school. 658 of his employees died on 9/11. The billionaire also happened to be a friend of Jeffrey Epstein. 6) Silverstein was also the lease owner of WTC Building 7, a 47-story steel skyscraper that housed offices for the CIA, Secret Service, Dept of Defense, and SEC. It completely collapsed into itself in 6.5 seconds on the afternoon of 9/11 - including 2 seconds of free-fall - after witnesses heard explosions. 7) Months after 9/11, Silverstein stated in a PBS documentary that he suggested to firefighters that “the smartest thing to do is to pull it” in reference to WTC Building 7. Later, he claimed that “pull it” meant pulling out firefighters from the building, not demolishing it; however, no firefighting activities were ever conducted inside WTC7 prior to its collapse. 8) In 2010, Fox News journalist Jeffrey Scott Shapiro reported that when he was in Manhattan on 9/11, he was told by officials that Silverstein “was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.” 9) There is no statute of limitations on murder. 10) 9/11 first responders, researchers and family members of victims will be speaking at Turning the Tide 2026 in NYC from Sept 10-13. If Larry shows up, he will have a lot of explaining to do… Get your single-day and multi-day tickets now at Learn more in the comment below ⬇️ (Credit to timelinejunkie for this AI masterpiece)
1:46

[RG911Team] “Lucky” Larry Silverstein might be worried about our upcoming 9/11 event in NYC. Here are 10 reasons why: 1) Larry signed the lease for the entire World Trade Center complex on July 24, 2001, 6 weeks before the attacks. Mandated asbestos removal from the towers was estimated to cost up to $1 billion. 2) Larry purchased terrorism insurance on the Twin Towers, which enabled him to obtain a $4.55 billion payout on his $14 million lease investment. 3) Multiple Twin Towers tenants reported unusual power downs across the Twin Towers on the weekend before 9/11, which took all electronic surveillance and security systems offline, allowing people to enter secure areas undetected. 4) Larry Silverstein claimed he survived 9/11 because he skipped his daily breakfast in the Twin Towers due to a dermatology appointment. 5) Commerce Secretary (and Silverstein business partner) Howard Lutnick, who was the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, claimed he survived 9/11 because he was running late from taking one of his children to his first day of school. 658 of his employees died on 9/11. The billionaire also happened to be a friend of Jeffrey Epstein. 6) Silverstein was also the lease owner of WTC Building 7, a 47-story steel skyscraper that housed offices for the CIA, Secret Service, Dept of Defense, and SEC. It completely collapsed into itself in 6.5 seconds on the afternoon of 9/11 - including 2 seconds of free-fall - after witnesses heard explosions. 7) Months after 9/11, Silverstein stated in a PBS documentary that he suggested to firefighters that “the smartest thing to do is to pull it” in reference to WTC Building 7. Later, he claimed that “pull it” meant pulling out firefighters from the building, not demolishing it; however, no firefighting activities were ever conducted inside WTC7 prior to its collapse. 8) In 2010, Fox News journalist Jeffrey Scott Shapiro reported that when he was in Manhattan on 9/11, he was told by officials that Silverstein “was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.” 9) There is no statute of limitations on murder. 10) 9/11 first responders, researchers and family members of victims will be speaking at Turning the Tide 2026 in NYC from Sept 10-13. If Larry shows up, he will have a lot of explaining to do… Get your single-day and multi-day tickets now at Learn more in the comment below ⬇️ (Credit to timelinejunkie for this AI masterpiece)

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

64,542 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Candace Owens: Larry Silverstein took out an insurance policy that covered acts of terrorism just six weeks before the attack and inexplicably broke his routine of having breakfast in the World Trade Center on that specific morning of all times. What an amazing coincidence! In interviews, Larry told the media that they "pulled" building seven. How did they have time to set up the explosives to do such a thing? None of this makes any damn sense. "Larry was quite lucky. He obtained the lease for the Twin Towers just six weeks prior to 9/11. He also took out an insurance policy which fortunately included coverage for acts of terrorism. When it came time to collect, when the towers went down, Silverstein claimed two incidents of terror, which allowed him to seek double indemnity. He collected 4.5 billion dollars from insurance on the towers that he had invested in just six weeks prior to the 9/11 attacks. I was so shocked looking at that that I wanted to debunk that...Larry was more lucky than that...Unbelievably. Every morning he used to have breakfast meetings at the World Trade Center but at the morning of 9/11, by the way this is according to Larry in his own interview, he just broke his own routine. He, fortunately, on the morning of 9/11 had a dermatologist appointment, and that spared his life." Do you think Larry had prior knowledge of an incoming false flag attack? Because I do. Candace Owens
2:43

Candace Owens: Larry Silverstein took out an insurance policy that covered acts of terrorism just six weeks before the attack and inexplicably broke his routine of having breakfast in the World Trade Center on that specific morning of all times. What an amazing coincidence! In interviews, Larry told the media that they "pulled" building seven. How did they have time to set up the explosives to do such a thing? None of this makes any damn sense. "Larry was quite lucky. He obtained the lease for the Twin Towers just six weeks prior to 9/11. He also took out an insurance policy which fortunately included coverage for acts of terrorism. When it came time to collect, when the towers went down, Silverstein claimed two incidents of terror, which allowed him to seek double indemnity. He collected 4.5 billion dollars from insurance on the towers that he had invested in just six weeks prior to the 9/11 attacks. I was so shocked looking at that that I wanted to debunk that...Larry was more lucky than that...Unbelievably. Every morning he used to have breakfast meetings at the World Trade Center but at the morning of 9/11, by the way this is according to Larry in his own interview, he just broke his own routine. He, fortunately, on the morning of 9/11 had a dermatologist appointment, and that spared his life." Do you think Larry had prior knowledge of an incoming false flag attack? Because I do. Candace Owens

Green Lives Matter

68,617 просмотров • 2 лет назад

BREAKING Richmond man has owned home for 51 years. Paid his taxes and held the title. It was a part of the Cowichan ruling in BC. The property now “belongs” to First Nations. Lender won’t renew his mortgage. He may lose his property. This ruling spread like wildfire & now a new $5 billion lawsuit popped up in Quebec. They want the land & $5 Billion. This is insane.
1:31

BREAKING Richmond man has owned home for 51 years. Paid his taxes and held the title. It was a part of the Cowichan ruling in BC. The property now “belongs” to First Nations. Lender won’t renew his mortgage. He may lose his property. This ruling spread like wildfire & now a new $5 billion lawsuit popped up in Quebec. They want the land & $5 Billion. This is insane.

Mario Zelaya

157,782 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Did you know the owner of the World Trade Center was Ashkenazi ✡️ Jewish? Larry Silverstein assumed a central role by securing a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center complex in July 2001, placing him in control of the towers and Building 7. Prior to the attacks, elevator modernization projects and security system upgrades were underway, which in alternative analyses could have provided contractors unrestricted access to the steel structural columns in the cores and exterior. These modifications created opportunities for placing materials without detection during the period of his management. Suspicious statements included Silverstein recounting in a documentary that he suggested officials "pull it" when informed the fire in World Trade Center 7 could not be contained. The structure then collapsed later that afternoon. Pulling a high-rise building due to fire has no historical precedent and is not a rational response, as standard practice involves evacuation and firefighting efforts rather than ordering structural failure. Firefighters typically remain until the last possible moment, making the decision appear inconsistent with normal procedures. This language and the subsequent free-fall collapse serve as indicators of foreknowledge or direct involvement in the operation. Silverstein showed preferences for Israeli, Jewish, and Bush-affiliated contractors in aspects of property management and related work around the complex. After the attacks he pursued and received terrorism insurance payouts structured as compensation for two separate events rather than one, corresponding to the impacts on the two towers, which resulted in a total recovery of approximately $4.5 billion. This dual-event interpretation maximized the financial return beyond a single occurrence claim. The selection of contractors and the successful dual payout strategy align with claims of coordinated planning that leveraged specific affiliations for operational access. The odds that Silverstein and his children just happened not to go to work that day are calculated as extremely low under ordinary circumstances. Silverstein cited a medical appointment while his son and daughter, both employed in the towers, were also absent without reported injury. Assuming typical daily attendance rates for executives and staff, the joint probability of all three avoiding the site by pure chance falls into the range of one in several thousand or lower. This coincidence is treated in the analysis as inconsistent with random occurrence and supportive of advanced awareness. Silverstein maintained documented connections to Israel through personal relationships with leaders and support for related causes. His Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry is examined as enabling ethnic self-interest to transcend official affiliations and loyalties. In this framework, group-oriented priorities can supersede national or professional obligations when perceived benefits to the ethnic community arise. Patterns of overrepresentation of Ashkenazi Jews in real estate and finance provide context for networked decision-making. Such dynamics allow individual actions to serve broader ethnic objectives without requiring formal organizational ties.
2:20

Did you know the owner of the World Trade Center was Ashkenazi ✡️ Jewish? Larry Silverstein assumed a central role by securing a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center complex in July 2001, placing him in control of the towers and Building 7. Prior to the attacks, elevator modernization projects and security system upgrades were underway, which in alternative analyses could have provided contractors unrestricted access to the steel structural columns in the cores and exterior. These modifications created opportunities for placing materials without detection during the period of his management. Suspicious statements included Silverstein recounting in a documentary that he suggested officials "pull it" when informed the fire in World Trade Center 7 could not be contained. The structure then collapsed later that afternoon. Pulling a high-rise building due to fire has no historical precedent and is not a rational response, as standard practice involves evacuation and firefighting efforts rather than ordering structural failure. Firefighters typically remain until the last possible moment, making the decision appear inconsistent with normal procedures. This language and the subsequent free-fall collapse serve as indicators of foreknowledge or direct involvement in the operation. Silverstein showed preferences for Israeli, Jewish, and Bush-affiliated contractors in aspects of property management and related work around the complex. After the attacks he pursued and received terrorism insurance payouts structured as compensation for two separate events rather than one, corresponding to the impacts on the two towers, which resulted in a total recovery of approximately $4.5 billion. This dual-event interpretation maximized the financial return beyond a single occurrence claim. The selection of contractors and the successful dual payout strategy align with claims of coordinated planning that leveraged specific affiliations for operational access. The odds that Silverstein and his children just happened not to go to work that day are calculated as extremely low under ordinary circumstances. Silverstein cited a medical appointment while his son and daughter, both employed in the towers, were also absent without reported injury. Assuming typical daily attendance rates for executives and staff, the joint probability of all three avoiding the site by pure chance falls into the range of one in several thousand or lower. This coincidence is treated in the analysis as inconsistent with random occurrence and supportive of advanced awareness. Silverstein maintained documented connections to Israel through personal relationships with leaders and support for related causes. His Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry is examined as enabling ethnic self-interest to transcend official affiliations and loyalties. In this framework, group-oriented priorities can supersede national or professional obligations when perceived benefits to the ethnic community arise. Patterns of overrepresentation of Ashkenazi Jews in real estate and finance provide context for networked decision-making. Such dynamics allow individual actions to serve broader ethnic objectives without requiring formal organizational ties.

Lampshades

12,486 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The OBAMA administration was making so many unauthorized payments to PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES participating in OBAMACARE that they couldn't even keep up to cover their own tracks. A government watchdog has determined the Obama administration is violating its own health care law by illegally diverting up to $5 billion to private insurance companies participating in Obamacare. The U.S. Government Accountability Office is the nonpartisan federal watchdog that determines whether federal officials are spending taxpayer dollars in accordance with the law. In a legal opinion issued last week, the GAO accused the Obama administration of illegally diverting billions of taxpayer dollars to private insurance companies. The opinion concerned the administration’s implementation of Obamacare’s “reinsurance” program, one of several insurer bailouts designed to prop up Obamacare’s rickety finances. Generally speaking, the reinsurance program taxes consumers in non-Obamacare plans to subsidize insurers who sell Obamacare plans. The program collects $25 billion from consumers, with $20 billion going to Obamacare-participating insurers and $5 billion to the federal treasury. The law is specific: the amount that each health insurance issuer pays toward the $5 billion designated for the U.S. Treasury “may not be used for the [reinsurance] program.” But once insurance companies participating in Obamacare’s Exchanges started suffering huge losses and heading for the exits, the administration began funneling them the money that was supposed to go to the Treasury. The administration has so far diverted $3 billion — and counting. The administration was making so many unauthorized payments to private insurance companies participating in Obamacare that it’s hard to keep them straight. Both the administration and the Supreme Court acknowledge that the operative text of the Affordable Care Act forbids certain payments to insurers participating in federally-run exchanges. The administration is paying tens of billions of dollars to such insurers because it was able to convince the court to bless those payments anyway. It is making payments to insurers on behalf of exchange enrollees who are categorically ineligible for subsidies because they have incomes below the poverty line. It is paying insurers tens of billions of dollars in illegal “cost-sharing” payments that a federal judge ruled “violate the Constitution.” It is attempting to skirt a congressional ban on $2.5 billion in “risk corridor” payments to insurers that President Obama himself signed into law. It is even making illegal payments to insurance companies on behalf of members of Congress and their staff — giving Congress its own special exemption from Obamacare. Consistent with past practice, the Obama administration is thumbing its nose at the nonpartisan GAO by announcing it will continue to divert these taxpayer funds to insurance companies. If the rule of law means anything, it is that the government is as bound by law, as are the people. If the people come to believe that the government is not, they will rightly conclude neither are they.
2:37

The OBAMA administration was making so many unauthorized payments to PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES participating in OBAMACARE that they couldn't even keep up to cover their own tracks. A government watchdog has determined the Obama administration is violating its own health care law by illegally diverting up to $5 billion to private insurance companies participating in Obamacare. The U.S. Government Accountability Office is the nonpartisan federal watchdog that determines whether federal officials are spending taxpayer dollars in accordance with the law. In a legal opinion issued last week, the GAO accused the Obama administration of illegally diverting billions of taxpayer dollars to private insurance companies. The opinion concerned the administration’s implementation of Obamacare’s “reinsurance” program, one of several insurer bailouts designed to prop up Obamacare’s rickety finances. Generally speaking, the reinsurance program taxes consumers in non-Obamacare plans to subsidize insurers who sell Obamacare plans. The program collects $25 billion from consumers, with $20 billion going to Obamacare-participating insurers and $5 billion to the federal treasury. The law is specific: the amount that each health insurance issuer pays toward the $5 billion designated for the U.S. Treasury “may not be used for the [reinsurance] program.” But once insurance companies participating in Obamacare’s Exchanges started suffering huge losses and heading for the exits, the administration began funneling them the money that was supposed to go to the Treasury. The administration has so far diverted $3 billion — and counting. The administration was making so many unauthorized payments to private insurance companies participating in Obamacare that it’s hard to keep them straight. Both the administration and the Supreme Court acknowledge that the operative text of the Affordable Care Act forbids certain payments to insurers participating in federally-run exchanges. The administration is paying tens of billions of dollars to such insurers because it was able to convince the court to bless those payments anyway. It is making payments to insurers on behalf of exchange enrollees who are categorically ineligible for subsidies because they have incomes below the poverty line. It is paying insurers tens of billions of dollars in illegal “cost-sharing” payments that a federal judge ruled “violate the Constitution.” It is attempting to skirt a congressional ban on $2.5 billion in “risk corridor” payments to insurers that President Obama himself signed into law. It is even making illegal payments to insurance companies on behalf of members of Congress and their staff — giving Congress its own special exemption from Obamacare. Consistent with past practice, the Obama administration is thumbing its nose at the nonpartisan GAO by announcing it will continue to divert these taxpayer funds to insurance companies. If the rule of law means anything, it is that the government is as bound by law, as are the people. If the people come to believe that the government is not, they will rightly conclude neither are they.

The SCIF

203,594 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

A federal judge delivered a criminal sentencing to OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma to resolve a US Department of Justice probe- a last necessary step to resolve a massive legal settlement resolving thousands of lawsuits against the company. The guilty plea and civil settlement with the federal government included $8.3 billion in forfeitures, fines and penalties. But the federal government agreed in a negotiated settlement to collect just $225 million in exchange for Purdue reaching a separate settlement with the thousands of other lawsuits it faces. Members of the Sackler family who own Purdue Pharma agreed to contribute up to $7 billion over 15 years in resolving those lawsuits.
1:36

A federal judge delivered a criminal sentencing to OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma to resolve a US Department of Justice probe- a last necessary step to resolve a massive legal settlement resolving thousands of lawsuits against the company. The guilty plea and civil settlement with the federal government included $8.3 billion in forfeitures, fines and penalties. But the federal government agreed in a negotiated settlement to collect just $225 million in exchange for Purdue reaching a separate settlement with the thousands of other lawsuits it faces. Members of the Sackler family who own Purdue Pharma agreed to contribute up to $7 billion over 15 years in resolving those lawsuits.

The Associated Press

57,079 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.
5:28

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.

West Lord

4,444,535 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇦🇪🇸🇦🇶🇦 One month of war cost the Gulf $80 billion and counting The breakdown is staggering. $40 billion in aviation and tourism losses. $21.5 billion in oil and gas exports that can't leave. $14.4 billion in port revenue that evaporated. And that's before you count the inflation rippling through Asia and Europe. Before February 28th, 138 ships passed through Hormuz daily. By March 17th, that number was three. Not a typo. Three. The culprit isn't Iranian mines or missiles. It's insurance. War risk premiums jumped from 0.125% to 0.4% within hours of Iran's first retaliation, adding $4 million per passage. Then insurers pulled coverage entirely. Without insurance, ships legally cannot move. These are countries that didn't start the war, didn't want the war, and spent years trying to prevent the war. Now they're holding an $80 billion bill for a conflict that was supposed to make the region safer. Source: Rudaw, UANI, Drop Site Media: First Post YT
1:22

🇦🇪🇸🇦🇶🇦 One month of war cost the Gulf $80 billion and counting The breakdown is staggering. $40 billion in aviation and tourism losses. $21.5 billion in oil and gas exports that can't leave. $14.4 billion in port revenue that evaporated. And that's before you count the inflation rippling through Asia and Europe. Before February 28th, 138 ships passed through Hormuz daily. By March 17th, that number was three. Not a typo. Three. The culprit isn't Iranian mines or missiles. It's insurance. War risk premiums jumped from 0.125% to 0.4% within hours of Iran's first retaliation, adding $4 million per passage. Then insurers pulled coverage entirely. Without insurance, ships legally cannot move. These are countries that didn't start the war, didn't want the war, and spent years trying to prevent the war. Now they're holding an $80 billion bill for a conflict that was supposed to make the region safer. Source: Rudaw, UANI, Drop Site Media: First Post YT

Mario Nawfal

66,162 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A man sold a website with no profits to Yahoo for $5.7 BILLION on April Fool's Day. Yahoo thought it was the deal of the century. They shut it down three years later. – Mark Cuban grew up in Pittsburgh selling garbage bags door to door at 12 to afford basketball sneakers. – In 1995 he started a company called The idea was simple. Let people listen to out of town sports radio on the internet. That was the whole company. – In 1998 he took it public. On the first day of trading the stock jumped 250 percent. The company hit $1 BILLION in value. Cubans owned 30 percent of it. – They had 570,000 users. The company had never made a single dollar of profit. – Yahoo was in a war with AOL and Microsoft to become the dominant homepage of the internet. – They were spending BILLIONS buying anything that looked like the future. – On April 1 1999, April Fool's Day Yahoo bought for $5.7 BILLION. Cuban's personal share was $1.4 BILLION. – But Cuban was nervous. The dot-com bubble was clearly out of control. So he paid $20 MILLION in fees to Wall Street banks to lock in a guaranteed price on his Yahoo shares before the market crashed. – Six months later the bubble burst. Yahoo stock fell from $300 to $5 per share. Had he held on his $1.4 BILLION would have been worth $25 MILLION. – He walked away with every dollar. Wall Street called it one of the top ten trades of all time. – Yahoo shut down in 2002. Three years after paying $5.7 BILLION for it. – In 2017 Verizon bought all of Yahoo for $4.5 BILLION. Less than what Yahoo paid for Cuban's website alone. – Cuban used the money to buy the Dallas Mavericks NBA team and became one of the most famous investors on Shark Tank. A website with no profits sold for $5.7 BILLION on April Fool's Day and shut down three years later.
0:40

A man sold a website with no profits to Yahoo for $5.7 BILLION on April Fool's Day. Yahoo thought it was the deal of the century. They shut it down three years later. – Mark Cuban grew up in Pittsburgh selling garbage bags door to door at 12 to afford basketball sneakers. – In 1995 he started a company called The idea was simple. Let people listen to out of town sports radio on the internet. That was the whole company. – In 1998 he took it public. On the first day of trading the stock jumped 250 percent. The company hit $1 BILLION in value. Cubans owned 30 percent of it. – They had 570,000 users. The company had never made a single dollar of profit. – Yahoo was in a war with AOL and Microsoft to become the dominant homepage of the internet. – They were spending BILLIONS buying anything that looked like the future. – On April 1 1999, April Fool's Day Yahoo bought for $5.7 BILLION. Cuban's personal share was $1.4 BILLION. – But Cuban was nervous. The dot-com bubble was clearly out of control. So he paid $20 MILLION in fees to Wall Street banks to lock in a guaranteed price on his Yahoo shares before the market crashed. – Six months later the bubble burst. Yahoo stock fell from $300 to $5 per share. Had he held on his $1.4 BILLION would have been worth $25 MILLION. – He walked away with every dollar. Wall Street called it one of the top ten trades of all time. – Yahoo shut down in 2002. Three years after paying $5.7 BILLION for it. – In 2017 Verizon bought all of Yahoo for $4.5 BILLION. Less than what Yahoo paid for Cuban's website alone. – Cuban used the money to buy the Dallas Mavericks NBA team and became one of the most famous investors on Shark Tank. A website with no profits sold for $5.7 BILLION on April Fool's Day and shut down three years later.

Aisar

1,078,245 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

In the first Austin Powers movie (1997), Dr. Evil initially demands a ransom of $1 million but, after his henchman Number Two points out that this is an insignificant sum, he changes the demand to $100 billion. Then, he travels back to 1969 and holds the world ransom for $100 billion, which the President laughs off because that amount doesn't exist yet. In 1969, $1m was generally considered an amount so large that the US government would begrudgingly pay it to save the world. In 1997, that amount was $100 billion. Today, such an amount would be north of $2 trillion, which would still be a trivial amount for the US, basically a few months of expenditure. What number would theoretically be demanded in 2040? $100 trillion? What comes after a trillion? Dr. Evil gives us the answer in Goldmember: "1 billion, gagillion, fafillion, shabolubalu million illion yillion...yen" They are running out of numbers to use; just like Zimbabwe, they would soon need to start cutting off zeros, because the denominations are getting so large that it's becoming unworkable.
1:00

In the first Austin Powers movie (1997), Dr. Evil initially demands a ransom of $1 million but, after his henchman Number Two points out that this is an insignificant sum, he changes the demand to $100 billion. Then, he travels back to 1969 and holds the world ransom for $100 billion, which the President laughs off because that amount doesn't exist yet. In 1969, $1m was generally considered an amount so large that the US government would begrudgingly pay it to save the world. In 1997, that amount was $100 billion. Today, such an amount would be north of $2 trillion, which would still be a trivial amount for the US, basically a few months of expenditure. What number would theoretically be demanded in 2040? $100 trillion? What comes after a trillion? Dr. Evil gives us the answer in Goldmember: "1 billion, gagillion, fafillion, shabolubalu million illion yillion...yen" They are running out of numbers to use; just like Zimbabwe, they would soon need to start cutting off zeros, because the denominations are getting so large that it's becoming unworkable.

Handre

35,731 просмотров • 29 дней назад

On September 11, 2001, Larry Silverstein — who had signed a $3.2 billion lease on the entire World Trade Center just seven weeks earlier — did not go to his office that morning. He accompanied his wife to a dermatologist appointment. Howard Lutnick — whose firm occupied the 101st through 105th floors of the North Tower — did not go to his office either. He took his son to the first day of kindergarten. 658 Cantor Fitzgerald employees went to the office that day. None of them survived. Within days Lutnick cut off their paychecks to their families — before many were even confirmed dead. Years later Cantor won a $135 million settlement from American Airlines. The bulk went to Lutnick and the firm's senior partners. He is now America's Secretary of Commerce.
1:07

On September 11, 2001, Larry Silverstein — who had signed a $3.2 billion lease on the entire World Trade Center just seven weeks earlier — did not go to his office that morning. He accompanied his wife to a dermatologist appointment. Howard Lutnick — whose firm occupied the 101st through 105th floors of the North Tower — did not go to his office either. He took his son to the first day of kindergarten. 658 Cantor Fitzgerald employees went to the office that day. None of them survived. Within days Lutnick cut off their paychecks to their families — before many were even confirmed dead. Years later Cantor won a $135 million settlement from American Airlines. The bulk went to Lutnick and the firm's senior partners. He is now America's Secretary of Commerce.

Alessi Allaman

68,108 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Google just reported $99 billion in profits it never actually received. Alphabet posted net income of $112.1 billion for a single quarter. Earnings per share came in at $9.11 against a Wall Street estimate of $2.87. That is one of the largest profit quarters any company has ever printed. Yet the stock fell about 7% the same day. When people read past the headline and opened the earnings release, they found the reason sitting in one footnote... $99 billion of that profit came from a line called other income. Alphabet describes it as "primarily the result of net unrealized gains on our equity securities." So Google did not sell anything. It marked up shares it already owned and ran the increase through its income statement. That single line added $77.1 billion to net income after tax. It accounted for $6.26 of the $9.11 in earnings per share. Strip it out and adjusted earnings per share were $2.85. Analysts wanted $2.89. The ACTUAL business missed. Now here is what makes this insane: Most of that $99 billion came from two holdings, SpaceX and Anthropic. SpaceX went public on June 12 at roughly $1.77 trillion, up from about $400 billion a year earlier. Alphabet's stake is worth $94.1 billion, and roughly $80 billion of it sits under sale restrictions. Anthropic went from a $350 billion valuation to $965 billion inside the same quarter. Alphabet's private company holdings were worth about $124.3 billion on June 30, and the vast majority of that is Anthropic. Google cannot sell either position right now. Now trace where that valuation came from: Google started putting money into Anthropic in 2023. A $300 million bet has grown into a $13.3 billion position with commitments of up to $30 billion more. Anthropic committed to buying at least five gigawatts of computing capacity from Google Cloud. Google Cloud revenue then grew 82% to about $24.8 billion, the strongest quarter that business has ever had. That growth is part of the story the market uses to price both companies. And when Anthropic's valuation jumped, Google booked the jump as its OWN profit. Google is the investor, the supplier, and the party deciding what the asset is worth. A tax and accounting consultant named Robert Willens flagged this back in April, pointing out that Alphabet is able to influence the value of one of its own assets. And Alphabet's free cash flow for the quarter was negative $5.9 billion. That is the first negative quarter since Google went public in August 2004. Capital spending hit $44.9 billion. Operating cash flow was $39.1 billion. Capex now eats about 37.5% of every dollar of revenue, the highest share in the company's public life. To fund it, Alphabet has taken on roughly $100 billion of debt this year and raised about $85 billion in a June share sale, its first in more than two decades. This is a company that spent years buying its own stock back. What happens next: Alphabet raised 2026 capital spending guidance to between $195 billion and $205 billion, the second raise in three months. The finance chief told analysts 2027 spending will rise significantly. The company also disclosed $811 billion in contracted future spending commitments as of June, up nearly $500 billion from March. Those commitments are signed contracts that get paid in cash. The profit is an estimate of what a private company might be worth on a given day. Estimates move in both directions. If Anthropic or SpaceX gets repriced downward, the same line that produced the biggest quarter in Google's history runs backwards, and this quarter produced no free cash flow to absorb it. Meta, Microsoft and Amazon are all carrying their own private AI stakes into their own earnings reports. Watch how much of their profit they actually collected in cash...
0:48

Google just reported $99 billion in profits it never actually received. Alphabet posted net income of $112.1 billion for a single quarter. Earnings per share came in at $9.11 against a Wall Street estimate of $2.87. That is one of the largest profit quarters any company has ever printed. Yet the stock fell about 7% the same day. When people read past the headline and opened the earnings release, they found the reason sitting in one footnote... $99 billion of that profit came from a line called other income. Alphabet describes it as "primarily the result of net unrealized gains on our equity securities." So Google did not sell anything. It marked up shares it already owned and ran the increase through its income statement. That single line added $77.1 billion to net income after tax. It accounted for $6.26 of the $9.11 in earnings per share. Strip it out and adjusted earnings per share were $2.85. Analysts wanted $2.89. The ACTUAL business missed. Now here is what makes this insane: Most of that $99 billion came from two holdings, SpaceX and Anthropic. SpaceX went public on June 12 at roughly $1.77 trillion, up from about $400 billion a year earlier. Alphabet's stake is worth $94.1 billion, and roughly $80 billion of it sits under sale restrictions. Anthropic went from a $350 billion valuation to $965 billion inside the same quarter. Alphabet's private company holdings were worth about $124.3 billion on June 30, and the vast majority of that is Anthropic. Google cannot sell either position right now. Now trace where that valuation came from: Google started putting money into Anthropic in 2023. A $300 million bet has grown into a $13.3 billion position with commitments of up to $30 billion more. Anthropic committed to buying at least five gigawatts of computing capacity from Google Cloud. Google Cloud revenue then grew 82% to about $24.8 billion, the strongest quarter that business has ever had. That growth is part of the story the market uses to price both companies. And when Anthropic's valuation jumped, Google booked the jump as its OWN profit. Google is the investor, the supplier, and the party deciding what the asset is worth. A tax and accounting consultant named Robert Willens flagged this back in April, pointing out that Alphabet is able to influence the value of one of its own assets. And Alphabet's free cash flow for the quarter was negative $5.9 billion. That is the first negative quarter since Google went public in August 2004. Capital spending hit $44.9 billion. Operating cash flow was $39.1 billion. Capex now eats about 37.5% of every dollar of revenue, the highest share in the company's public life. To fund it, Alphabet has taken on roughly $100 billion of debt this year and raised about $85 billion in a June share sale, its first in more than two decades. This is a company that spent years buying its own stock back. What happens next: Alphabet raised 2026 capital spending guidance to between $195 billion and $205 billion, the second raise in three months. The finance chief told analysts 2027 spending will rise significantly. The company also disclosed $811 billion in contracted future spending commitments as of June, up nearly $500 billion from March. Those commitments are signed contracts that get paid in cash. The profit is an estimate of what a private company might be worth on a given day. Estimates move in both directions. If Anthropic or SpaceX gets repriced downward, the same line that produced the biggest quarter in Google's history runs backwards, and this quarter produced no free cash flow to absorb it. Meta, Microsoft and Amazon are all carrying their own private AI stakes into their own earnings reports. Watch how much of their profit they actually collected in cash...

Ricardo

364,107 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Ron Baron: "SpaceX is going to be a $20 to $30 trillion company - when people hear that number they say it sounds like you're on drugs - I don't do drugs, I don't drink" this is him explaining how he turned a $2 billion SpaceX investment into $25 billion across 27 separate transactions, why he just bought another billion on the IPO, and why he thinks he'll make 20 to 30 times from here "I came to New York in 1969 in debt $15,000 - my credit wasn't good enough to get a telephone" "$100,000 book value in 1982 - that's now $6 billion" "we made $40 billion in profits before Elon and $30 billion more with Elon - I think we're going to make hundreds of billions from here" bookmark & watch the full conversation ↓
58:21

Ron Baron: "SpaceX is going to be a $20 to $30 trillion company - when people hear that number they say it sounds like you're on drugs - I don't do drugs, I don't drink" this is him explaining how he turned a $2 billion SpaceX investment into $25 billion across 27 separate transactions, why he just bought another billion on the IPO, and why he thinks he'll make 20 to 30 times from here "I came to New York in 1969 in debt $15,000 - my credit wasn't good enough to get a telephone" "$100,000 book value in 1982 - that's now $6 billion" "we made $40 billion in profits before Elon and $30 billion more with Elon - I think we're going to make hundreds of billions from here" bookmark & watch the full conversation ↓

Сarm1ne

109,661 просмотров • 28 дней назад