Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Problem: Meta can wrongly restrict legitimate content, while harmful ads, deepfakes and even child-abuse-linked material can still slip through. At the same time, India’s 3-hour takedown rule is so broad that platforms may feel pressure to remove first and examine later. Solution: Strong regulation is necessary, but it should... show more

Praffulgarg

83,950 subscribers

11,846 views • 8 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Kids Online Safety Act is back in Congress, rebranded as child protection while quietly expanding the pressure on platforms to police “harmful” content. On paper, it targets mental health risks and dangerous material. In practice, it hands regulators and state attorneys general more leverage over what platforms allow to circulate. That means more algorithmic suppression, more over-moderation, and more political speech getting buried to avoid liability. Pro-Palestine content, anti-war organizing, and dissenting narratives are always the first to get flagged when compliance becomes the priority. This is how censorship evolves in America. Not with a dramatic ban, but a bill poised to be for your “safety”

The Kids Online Safety Act is back in Congress, rebranded as child protection while quietly expanding the pressure on platforms to police “harmful” content. On paper, it targets mental health risks and dangerous material. In practice, it hands regulators and state attorneys general more leverage over what platforms allow to circulate. That means more algorithmic suppression, more over-moderation, and more political speech getting buried to avoid liability. Pro-Palestine content, anti-war organizing, and dissenting narratives are always the first to get flagged when compliance becomes the priority. This is how censorship evolves in America. Not with a dramatic ban, but a bill poised to be for your “safety”

YourFavoriteGuy

37,246 views • 5 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: After chairing the meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications & IT, Committee Chairman and BJP MP Dr Nishikant Dubey said, "...The second question is that Meta India removed the Prime Minister's content. This is not the first time Meta India has done this. If you recall, Zuckerberg himself made a statement in January regarding the 2024 elections and later apologized. This shows that his intention is to destabilise the country. When a video of the Prime Minister of India can be removed, and they themselves admitted that the content was missing for five hours, from 12:30 am to 5:00 am, this is a very serious matter. Our committee has said two things and has clearly stated that the apology should come from Zuckerberg. If Zuckerberg does not give it, then the safe harbour protection under Section 79 should be withdrawn from him. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) is another issue. YouTube also has that content. Meta also has that content, and they do not remove content related to child abuse. They do not remove content related to women. Both these rules of the Government of India are very strict, and on top of that, they do not listen to the Home Ministry. They do not listen to the IT Ministry either. So, we have said that in all these matters, and in many other matters, you know that the Chief Minister of the Congress government of Telangana has filed an FIR against Meta India. We have said that safe harbour should be removed in all these matters..."

#WATCH | Delhi: After chairing the meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications & IT, Committee Chairman and BJP MP Dr Nishikant Dubey said, "...The second question is that Meta India removed the Prime Minister's content. This is not the first time Meta India has done this. If you recall, Zuckerberg himself made a statement in January regarding the 2024 elections and later apologized. This shows that his intention is to destabilise the country. When a video of the Prime Minister of India can be removed, and they themselves admitted that the content was missing for five hours, from 12:30 am to 5:00 am, this is a very serious matter. Our committee has said two things and has clearly stated that the apology should come from Zuckerberg. If Zuckerberg does not give it, then the safe harbour protection under Section 79 should be withdrawn from him. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) is another issue. YouTube also has that content. Meta also has that content, and they do not remove content related to child abuse. They do not remove content related to women. Both these rules of the Government of India are very strict, and on top of that, they do not listen to the Home Ministry. They do not listen to the IT Ministry either. So, we have said that in all these matters, and in many other matters, you know that the Chief Minister of the Congress government of Telangana has filed an FIR against Meta India. We have said that safe harbour should be removed in all these matters..."

ANI

55,478 views • 12 days ago

Elon Musk: We should make life multiplanetary as soon as we can. “Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and the first writing is only about 5,000 years old. That's basically, practically yesterday. So it's taken 4.5 billion years to get to this point. So the window of opportunity to make life multiplanetary and have a base on the moon or Mars is open for the first time in the 4.5 billion year history of Earth. It may be open for a long time or maybe open for a short time, but I think we should not assume it'll be open for a long time. And we should assume it'll be open for a short time, and while the window of opportunity is open, we should make life multiplanetary.” From: Full Send Podcast, August 5, 2022

Elon Musk: We should make life multiplanetary as soon as we can. “Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and the first writing is only about 5,000 years old. That's basically, practically yesterday. So it's taken 4.5 billion years to get to this point. So the window of opportunity to make life multiplanetary and have a base on the moon or Mars is open for the first time in the 4.5 billion year history of Earth. It may be open for a long time or maybe open for a short time, but I think we should not assume it'll be open for a long time. And we should assume it'll be open for a short time, and while the window of opportunity is open, we should make life multiplanetary.” From: Full Send Podcast, August 5, 2022

ELON CLIPS

36,372 views • 7 months ago

The situation in Brazil is getting ugly, with X and Elon Musk fighting for the right of the people of Brazil to voice their free speech. The problem, though, is that the highest court in the land says that some of this free speech is not legal speech. Musk doesn't get enough credit for his free speech advocacy, but at the same time, he did say that X will obey the laws of the countries where people reside. So who should decide if speech is or is not in line with the laws of Brazil? Should it be Elon Musk and his lawyers or should it be the highest court in Brazil? Even if they are misinterpreting their own laws, who should decide that? What are your thoughts?

The situation in Brazil is getting ugly, with X and Elon Musk fighting for the right of the people of Brazil to voice their free speech. The problem, though, is that the highest court in the land says that some of this free speech is not legal speech. Musk doesn't get enough credit for his free speech advocacy, but at the same time, he did say that X will obey the laws of the countries where people reside. So who should decide if speech is or is not in line with the laws of Brazil? Should it be Elon Musk and his lawyers or should it be the highest court in Brazil? Even if they are misinterpreting their own laws, who should decide that? What are your thoughts?

Ed Krassenstein

277,690 views • 2 years ago

And so it begins. YouTube Just took down my video and issued me a warning strike for my latest video react to Brandon Herrera's latest Darwin Awards. Can someone at TeamYouTube explain how a video I reacted to is still up and fully accessible (and rightly so because there's nothing wrong with it) and yet MY video gets taken down, even after I'd actually edited out some parts before posting, and I get a strike for it. Just what the hell is going on?!? Can I please get a HUMAN to look at this for once??? Oh and just so there's full transparency here, I'm going to post the full video that I received a strike for in this tweet so anyone can view it. The original that I reacted to is still up and available for viewing (and I strongly recommend you watch it not only to give the original content creator their proper views but to compare our two videos) as of the time of this posting at:

And so it begins. YouTube Just took down my video and issued me a warning strike for my latest video react to Brandon Herrera's latest Darwin Awards. Can someone at TeamYouTube explain how a video I reacted to is still up and fully accessible (and rightly so because there's nothing wrong with it) and yet MY video gets taken down, even after I'd actually edited out some parts before posting, and I get a strike for it. Just what the hell is going on?!? Can I please get a HUMAN to look at this for once??? Oh and just so there's full transparency here, I'm going to post the full video that I received a strike for in this tweet so anyone can view it. The original that I reacted to is still up and available for viewing (and I strongly recommend you watch it not only to give the original content creator their proper views but to compare our two videos) as of the time of this posting at:

❤️‍🔥 Ember Paradox ❤️‍🔥

81,090 views • 8 months ago

Parents & Students are upset about what took place between a student & representatives at Arkansas State University One student wrote I just got off the phone with the Chancellor’s office at Arkansas State University regarding what’s been happening on campus. It is extremely disappointing and unacceptable that representatives from Turning Point USA are reportedly on campus making derogatory and racist remarks toward Black individuals—using terms like “ghetto,” “dusty,” and “ashy.” That kind of language is harmful, disrespectful, and creates a hostile environment for students. Yes, A-State is a public university, and I understand that under the First Amendment, even offensive speech can be protected. Court rulings like Brandenburg v. Ohio make it clear that speech is protected unless it incites imminent violence or is a direct threat. But let’s be clear just because something is legally protected does NOT make it right. Universities still have a responsibility to ensure their students feel safe, respected, and supported. Speech that targets and degrades people based on race can contribute to a hostile and discriminatory environment, and that should never be ignored. This is bigger than “free speech.” This is about dignity. This is about respect. This is about protecting ALL students. I am calling on Arkansas State University to take this seriously, review the situation, enforce their policies, and stand firm in their commitment to an inclusive campus. We can uphold free speech AND hold people accountable for harmful behavior at the same time. NAACP NAACP highlight #lrhn

Parents & Students are upset about what took place between a student & representatives at Arkansas State University One student wrote I just got off the phone with the Chancellor’s office at Arkansas State University regarding what’s been happening on campus. It is extremely disappointing and unacceptable that representatives from Turning Point USA are reportedly on campus making derogatory and racist remarks toward Black individuals—using terms like “ghetto,” “dusty,” and “ashy.” That kind of language is harmful, disrespectful, and creates a hostile environment for students. Yes, A-State is a public university, and I understand that under the First Amendment, even offensive speech can be protected. Court rulings like Brandenburg v. Ohio make it clear that speech is protected unless it incites imminent violence or is a direct threat. But let’s be clear just because something is legally protected does NOT make it right. Universities still have a responsibility to ensure their students feel safe, respected, and supported. Speech that targets and degrades people based on race can contribute to a hostile and discriminatory environment, and that should never be ignored. This is bigger than “free speech.” This is about dignity. This is about respect. This is about protecting ALL students. I am calling on Arkansas State University to take this seriously, review the situation, enforce their policies, and stand firm in their commitment to an inclusive campus. We can uphold free speech AND hold people accountable for harmful behavior at the same time. NAACP NAACP highlight #lrhn

LRHN cash

11,793 views • 4 months ago

A 4-year-old girl in a wheelchair sits on the sidelines during a school program while the other children sing and participate. Parents attend excited to see their child included. Instead, she’s off to the side — watching, not part of the group. Feeling heartbroken, they decide to homeschool and later post a video of the moment on social media to explain why. Days later, the school district responds strongly — even sending police to their home and warning of possible legal action over the post. Every parent wants their child to feel included and valued. At the same time, public schools and families can clash over how situations are portrayed online. Inclusion, communication, and transparency matter — especially when disabilities are involved. When inclusion falls short, is homeschooling the better option — or should parents push harder for change within the public school system?

A 4-year-old girl in a wheelchair sits on the sidelines during a school program while the other children sing and participate. Parents attend excited to see their child included. Instead, she’s off to the side — watching, not part of the group. Feeling heartbroken, they decide to homeschool and later post a video of the moment on social media to explain why. Days later, the school district responds strongly — even sending police to their home and warning of possible legal action over the post. Every parent wants their child to feel included and valued. At the same time, public schools and families can clash over how situations are portrayed online. Inclusion, communication, and transparency matter — especially when disabilities are involved. When inclusion falls short, is homeschooling the better option — or should parents push harder for change within the public school system?

TheRealCherokeeOwl

77,584 views • 5 months ago

Sunghoon and Jungwon’s relationship is honestly something so special to me. I feel like there’s so much mutual respect between them. You can tell Sunghoon genuinely values Jungwon as a leader and understands the pressure and burden he carries, which makes him respect him even more. I think sometimes Sunghoon sees Jungwon as someone far more mature than his age because Jungwon can be so reliable, smart, composed, and trustworthy when things get serious. But at the same time, it seems like Sunghoon never forgets that Jungwon is still younger than him 😭 he still finds him cute and naturally wants to protect him, support him, cherish him, and make things easier for him whenever he can. That contrast is honestly what makes their relationship so endearing to me. Jungwon can be this dependable leader everyone leans on, but in Sunghoon’s eyes he’s also still his cute younger brother 🥲 He seriously can never say no to him 😭

Sunghoon and Jungwon’s relationship is honestly something so special to me. I feel like there’s so much mutual respect between them. You can tell Sunghoon genuinely values Jungwon as a leader and understands the pressure and burden he carries, which makes him respect him even more. I think sometimes Sunghoon sees Jungwon as someone far more mature than his age because Jungwon can be so reliable, smart, composed, and trustworthy when things get serious. But at the same time, it seems like Sunghoon never forgets that Jungwon is still younger than him 😭 he still finds him cute and naturally wants to protect him, support him, cherish him, and make things easier for him whenever he can. That contrast is honestly what makes their relationship so endearing to me. Jungwon can be this dependable leader everyone leans on, but in Sunghoon’s eyes he’s also still his cute younger brother 🥲 He seriously can never say no to him 😭

sai

17,835 views • 2 months ago

ELON: CITIZEN JOURNALISM IS A SUPER BIG DEAL “Legacy media is from a time when, in order to learn any news, you had to aggregate the news to some central publication. And then, some editor would decide what people should hear, and then they'd print the newspaper with a lot of paper literally, and then distribute that paper. And that's how you learned things. But you obviously don't need that anymore. You've got the Internet, so anyone can learn anything at any time. That's why 𝕏 is the future. It's citizen journalism, where you hear from the people. It's by the people, for the people. That's what it's all about. This is a super big deal, and it's absolutely fundamental and transformative that the people actually get to decide the news and the narrative and what matters. The legacy media is basically controlled by a handful of editors-in-chief. That's it. They decide what's going to get published. That's why I really encourage everyone out there to write stuff on the 𝕏 platform and other platforms too. Citizen journalism is the future.” Source: Lancaster, Pennsylvania, October 2024

ELON: CITIZEN JOURNALISM IS A SUPER BIG DEAL “Legacy media is from a time when, in order to learn any news, you had to aggregate the news to some central publication. And then, some editor would decide what people should hear, and then they'd print the newspaper with a lot of paper literally, and then distribute that paper. And that's how you learned things. But you obviously don't need that anymore. You've got the Internet, so anyone can learn anything at any time. That's why 𝕏 is the future. It's citizen journalism, where you hear from the people. It's by the people, for the people. That's what it's all about. This is a super big deal, and it's absolutely fundamental and transformative that the people actually get to decide the news and the narrative and what matters. The legacy media is basically controlled by a handful of editors-in-chief. That's it. They decide what's going to get published. That's why I really encourage everyone out there to write stuff on the 𝕏 platform and other platforms too. Citizen journalism is the future.” Source: Lancaster, Pennsylvania, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

35,106 views • 1 year ago

Mistral just released Voxtral TTS, an open-weight voice model that tries to match ElevenLabs while keeping it free. A 3-billionn param model that fits on a laptop and runs 6X faster than real-time speech. It is split into 3 parts that handle different jobs. - The 3.4B part is the main language brain that understands the text and plans what should be spoken. - The 390M part turns that plan into speech features like rhythm, pronunciation, and tone. - The 300M part converts those speech features into the final compressed audio signal you can play. That split helps because each part only does the job it is best at, which can make the whole system faster and lighter than one giant model doing everything alone. Mistral claims about 90ms to first audio, about 6x faster than real-time speech output, about 3GB RAM after quantization, 9 languages, and voice copying from 5s of audio, even across languages. Its internal tests report 62.8% preference over ElevenLabs Flash on default voices and 69.9% on custom voices, but the bigger point is that companies can keep speech data on their own machines. IMO, enterprise buyers usually care most about control, cost, and latency, So this model should give it great push for voice-based AI apps/products.

Mistral just released Voxtral TTS, an open-weight voice model that tries to match ElevenLabs while keeping it free. A 3-billionn param model that fits on a laptop and runs 6X faster than real-time speech. It is split into 3 parts that handle different jobs. - The 3.4B part is the main language brain that understands the text and plans what should be spoken. - The 390M part turns that plan into speech features like rhythm, pronunciation, and tone. - The 300M part converts those speech features into the final compressed audio signal you can play. That split helps because each part only does the job it is best at, which can make the whole system faster and lighter than one giant model doing everything alone. Mistral claims about 90ms to first audio, about 6x faster than real-time speech output, about 3GB RAM after quantization, 9 languages, and voice copying from 5s of audio, even across languages. Its internal tests report 62.8% preference over ElevenLabs Flash on default voices and 69.9% on custom voices, but the bigger point is that companies can keep speech data on their own machines. IMO, enterprise buyers usually care most about control, cost, and latency, So this model should give it great push for voice-based AI apps/products.

Rohan Paul

15,672 views • 4 months ago

This is chilling and uncomfortable. But, I get it. In a weird but compelling way, I get it. As a people, we move on. We move to the next headline quickly. We are shocked, we lament, protest, etc but eventually ... WE MOVE ON. This AI rendering of a story is morbid and uncomfortable... And even triggering. But, dammit, maybe this is what is needed. Evil gets shielded and protected by our need to not want to be confronted by truths that make us uncomfortable. How many stories of families hiding traumas and crimes of familial culprits because they don't want to expose the shame of umdeni? What does that do but protect perpetrators? Our discomfort about our reality can be a hindrance to accountability. The shame and discomfort should be reserved for the culprit. We are surprised how recidivism is so high in Mzansi, but we forget that we protect criminals' dignity more than the victims'. There is a lot that is cringe-y about AI and it should be regulated. This, though chilling, I feel it is a necessary evil if it will make Olorato and many like her not to become old news because today we have moved on to a new shocking headline. Remember her and live with the reality that you or someone you love and/or know may be next.

This is chilling and uncomfortable. But, I get it. In a weird but compelling way, I get it. As a people, we move on. We move to the next headline quickly. We are shocked, we lament, protest, etc but eventually ... WE MOVE ON. This AI rendering of a story is morbid and uncomfortable... And even triggering. But, dammit, maybe this is what is needed. Evil gets shielded and protected by our need to not want to be confronted by truths that make us uncomfortable. How many stories of families hiding traumas and crimes of familial culprits because they don't want to expose the shame of umdeni? What does that do but protect perpetrators? Our discomfort about our reality can be a hindrance to accountability. The shame and discomfort should be reserved for the culprit. We are surprised how recidivism is so high in Mzansi, but we forget that we protect criminals' dignity more than the victims'. There is a lot that is cringe-y about AI and it should be regulated. This, though chilling, I feel it is a necessary evil if it will make Olorato and many like her not to become old news because today we have moved on to a new shocking headline. Remember her and live with the reality that you or someone you love and/or know may be next.

Kgopolo

67,351 views • 6 months ago

NyaraVT is truly obsessed with kids. He is obsessed with specifically "trans kids" in the context that he thinks kids should be groomed and given HRT and puberty blockers early, because he thinks it's "cruel" to allow trans people to go through puberty. Trans kids never exist outside of being groomed. The literature supporting it is all from delusional progressives who are biased, often projecting their own ideologies into areas that do not belong. Any who do "socially transition" as youths desist by the time they are adults, often as much as 90%+ For example, kids do not understand sex when they are 4. Anyone implying that kids are "trans" is just a creepy adult who is just projecting adult framing of sexuality to a child who is exploring the world through play. Any adult who tries to label their kids trans based on early play behavior, by 'teaching' the child sexual play, is by definition grooming and child sexual abuse. At best, this causes iatrogenic harm to the child and leads to lifelong mental and health issues even without any overt CSA. Of course, the reality is that puberty isn't optional. It is a biological and physiological need; without it, these people grow up with endless mental and physical health problems. The Cass review and many other critical studies show that puberty blockers and early HRT do not produce the "positive outcomes" these trans kids activists claim that they do. Even before modern times, historical child psychiatry and sexology are rife with data problems, scandals, controversies, and actual child sexual abuse incidents. Anyone still trusting the data of these "studies" blindly should be ignored completely. TLDR, Trans kids should not be a thing, and anyone promoting it should be treated with extreme suspicion.

NyaraVT is truly obsessed with kids. He is obsessed with specifically "trans kids" in the context that he thinks kids should be groomed and given HRT and puberty blockers early, because he thinks it's "cruel" to allow trans people to go through puberty. Trans kids never exist outside of being groomed. The literature supporting it is all from delusional progressives who are biased, often projecting their own ideologies into areas that do not belong. Any who do "socially transition" as youths desist by the time they are adults, often as much as 90%+ For example, kids do not understand sex when they are 4. Anyone implying that kids are "trans" is just a creepy adult who is just projecting adult framing of sexuality to a child who is exploring the world through play. Any adult who tries to label their kids trans based on early play behavior, by 'teaching' the child sexual play, is by definition grooming and child sexual abuse. At best, this causes iatrogenic harm to the child and leads to lifelong mental and health issues even without any overt CSA. Of course, the reality is that puberty isn't optional. It is a biological and physiological need; without it, these people grow up with endless mental and physical health problems. The Cass review and many other critical studies show that puberty blockers and early HRT do not produce the "positive outcomes" these trans kids activists claim that they do. Even before modern times, historical child psychiatry and sexology are rife with data problems, scandals, controversies, and actual child sexual abuse incidents. Anyone still trusting the data of these "studies" blindly should be ignored completely. TLDR, Trans kids should not be a thing, and anyone promoting it should be treated with extreme suspicion.

Emerald Apple

94,769 views • 8 days ago

Why Meta India Must Pay. Facebook and Instagram Should Face a Billion Dollar Fine For Restricting Modi's Speech. 1/ Meta's global affairs chief Joel Kaplan apologised to India's IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw. Mark Zuckerberg separately apologised over CSAM, deepfakes and "operational failures." Meta executives admitted money was paid to boost a certain type of content on their platforms. 2/ The backdrop: PM Narendra Modi's July 23 video addressing student protesters over the NEET-UG paper-leak scandal was briefly restricted on Facebook. Meta called it an "error" and restored it. But that error surfaced in the middle of a 36-day youth movement that had already forced a Cabinet minister to resign. 3/ Timing is the whole story. A platform doesn't get to plead "operational glitch" and "paid content promotion" in the same meeting and expect both to be read as unrelated coincidences. Either the system is out of control, or someone had their thumb on the scale. Neither answer is reassuring. 4/ This isn't Meta's first apology tour in India. Elections, protests, political content — the pattern keeps repeating: something goes wrong at a politically sensitive moment, a minister objects, an executive says sorry, and the underlying system is never actually opened up for inspection. 5/ An apology is not accountability. If Meta wants to be believed, it doesn't get to describe the outcome — it has to show the mechanism. What content was boosted, and to whom? What decided the boost — algorithmic, paid or manual? The scale and reach of that promotion. Who signed off on it? Nothing less is a real answer. 6/ India's Parliamentary IT committee is already floating the nuclear option: strip Meta of intermediary "safe harbour" status under Section 79, and treat it as a publisher — legally responsible for what it amplifies, not just what it hosts. That's the leverage that actually forces disclosure, not another apology in a closed-door meeting. 7/ The ask is simple: transparency first, trust second. No "trust our internal review." No quiet apology after a minister already caught it. If a platform can move a national protest narrative, it owes the country receipts — not regret. 8/ A $1 billion fine should drill the message home - information warfare against India comes with consequences.

Why Meta India Must Pay. Facebook and Instagram Should Face a Billion Dollar Fine For Restricting Modi's Speech. 1/ Meta's global affairs chief Joel Kaplan apologised to India's IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw. Mark Zuckerberg separately apologised over CSAM, deepfakes and "operational failures." Meta executives admitted money was paid to boost a certain type of content on their platforms. 2/ The backdrop: PM Narendra Modi's July 23 video addressing student protesters over the NEET-UG paper-leak scandal was briefly restricted on Facebook. Meta called it an "error" and restored it. But that error surfaced in the middle of a 36-day youth movement that had already forced a Cabinet minister to resign. 3/ Timing is the whole story. A platform doesn't get to plead "operational glitch" and "paid content promotion" in the same meeting and expect both to be read as unrelated coincidences. Either the system is out of control, or someone had their thumb on the scale. Neither answer is reassuring. 4/ This isn't Meta's first apology tour in India. Elections, protests, political content — the pattern keeps repeating: something goes wrong at a politically sensitive moment, a minister objects, an executive says sorry, and the underlying system is never actually opened up for inspection. 5/ An apology is not accountability. If Meta wants to be believed, it doesn't get to describe the outcome — it has to show the mechanism. What content was boosted, and to whom? What decided the boost — algorithmic, paid or manual? The scale and reach of that promotion. Who signed off on it? Nothing less is a real answer. 6/ India's Parliamentary IT committee is already floating the nuclear option: strip Meta of intermediary "safe harbour" status under Section 79, and treat it as a publisher — legally responsible for what it amplifies, not just what it hosts. That's the leverage that actually forces disclosure, not another apology in a closed-door meeting. 7/ The ask is simple: transparency first, trust second. No "trust our internal review." No quiet apology after a minister already caught it. If a platform can move a national protest narrative, it owes the country receipts — not regret. 8/ A $1 billion fine should drill the message home - information warfare against India comes with consequences.

Rakesh Krishnan Simha

34,094 views • 10 days ago

REPORT: Censorship in the UK has just taken a terrifying new leap—one that could unravel the very fabric of free speech. The “Online Safety Act” has come into effect, promising a “safer” internet. But in reality, it’s an unprecedented power grab disguised as a child protection law. Instead of protecting children, it forces companies to police and censor online content, eroding privacy and free speech like never before. Encrypted platforms like WhatsApp and Signal are now required to monitor user chats for “illegal content,” putting end-to-end encryption in jeopardy. But make no mistake—this law isn’t about safety. It’s about controlling the flow of information and silencing dissent. Enacting it under the banner of protecting children only makes it harder to expose what it really is. Even worse, this Orwellian law could set a global precedent, pushing censorship worldwide under the guise of safety. Platforms are now forced to remove “harmful” content—even when it’s perfectly legal—and without a clear definition of what’s considered “harmful.” Expect automated censorship of everything from political speech to satire, art, and even everyday conversations. This doesn’t stop with just Facebook or Wikipedia—it applies to every website where users interact, giving governments the power to dictate what’s “safe” online, silencing opposition, and tightening their grip on free speech. This is leading us straight towards a China-style social credit system for the entire world. How much longer can we stay silent? The consequences are absolutely chilling. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report as she reveals what’s really at stake—while you still can.

REPORT: Censorship in the UK has just taken a terrifying new leap—one that could unravel the very fabric of free speech. The “Online Safety Act” has come into effect, promising a “safer” internet. But in reality, it’s an unprecedented power grab disguised as a child protection law. Instead of protecting children, it forces companies to police and censor online content, eroding privacy and free speech like never before. Encrypted platforms like WhatsApp and Signal are now required to monitor user chats for “illegal content,” putting end-to-end encryption in jeopardy. But make no mistake—this law isn’t about safety. It’s about controlling the flow of information and silencing dissent. Enacting it under the banner of protecting children only makes it harder to expose what it really is. Even worse, this Orwellian law could set a global precedent, pushing censorship worldwide under the guise of safety. Platforms are now forced to remove “harmful” content—even when it’s perfectly legal—and without a clear definition of what’s considered “harmful.” Expect automated censorship of everything from political speech to satire, art, and even everyday conversations. This doesn’t stop with just Facebook or Wikipedia—it applies to every website where users interact, giving governments the power to dictate what’s “safe” online, silencing opposition, and tightening their grip on free speech. This is leading us straight towards a China-style social credit system for the entire world. How much longer can we stay silent? The consequences are absolutely chilling. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report as she reveals what’s really at stake—while you still can.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

62,981 views • 1 year ago

Fear… No matter the skill in your feet, fear can stifle and suffocate. It can tear talent apart. It can annihilate ability. Champions can be found wanting. The easy becoming difficult. The simple becoming complex. Jamie Carragher illustrates this by highlighting the incredibly gifted Liverpool players hiding. Urging the ball to go long. Refusing to show for it. Seeing the game out with fingers crossed more so than with intelligence and confidence. Fear is performance anxiety. It’s a low intent, energy-back. It’s hesitancy of action rather than positivity of movement and motion. It’s inhibition as opposed to purposeful play. It’s passiveness and caution rather than proactiveness and expansiveness. Small rather than big… Players need to learn to respond to their inner impulses. They need to learn to respond to the thoughts that envelope their mind, and the emotions and feelings that surge through their body. With weight settled forward they should show for it. While ignoring their internal strife they should lean into the challenge. With discipline and determination they should execute actions confident, brave, and aggressive… …even when everything inside of them encourages the opposite. This is what it is to be mentally skilful. This is what it is to be mentally tough. This is what it is to be mentally strong. This is fearless football…and fearless football takes daily work

Fear… No matter the skill in your feet, fear can stifle and suffocate. It can tear talent apart. It can annihilate ability. Champions can be found wanting. The easy becoming difficult. The simple becoming complex. Jamie Carragher illustrates this by highlighting the incredibly gifted Liverpool players hiding. Urging the ball to go long. Refusing to show for it. Seeing the game out with fingers crossed more so than with intelligence and confidence. Fear is performance anxiety. It’s a low intent, energy-back. It’s hesitancy of action rather than positivity of movement and motion. It’s inhibition as opposed to purposeful play. It’s passiveness and caution rather than proactiveness and expansiveness. Small rather than big… Players need to learn to respond to their inner impulses. They need to learn to respond to the thoughts that envelope their mind, and the emotions and feelings that surge through their body. With weight settled forward they should show for it. While ignoring their internal strife they should lean into the challenge. With discipline and determination they should execute actions confident, brave, and aggressive… …even when everything inside of them encourages the opposite. This is what it is to be mentally skilful. This is what it is to be mentally tough. This is what it is to be mentally strong. This is fearless football…and fearless football takes daily work

Daniel Abrahams

64,165 views • 7 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Tim Burchett says the fight over the SAVE America Act could not come at a more important time, and he is exactly right because Americans are tired of watching politicians talk about election integrity while refusing to do the hard work required to actually secure the system. Burchett made it clear on The Big Weekend Show that Republicans need to do everything possible to pass this legislation, because voters deserve elections that are easy for legal citizens to participate in and impossible for anyone else to exploit. That should not be controversial. Citizenship verification should not be controversial. Voter ID should not be controversial. Clean voter rolls should not be controversial. But somehow Washington keeps acting like basic safeguards are too difficult, too risky, or too politically uncomfortable to fight for, even while cities like New York are showing exactly how fast political shifts can change the future of the country. Republicans have the issue, the voters, and the mandate. Now they need the backbone. Pass the SAVE America Act and stop making excuses. 🇺🇸🔥

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Tim Burchett says the fight over the SAVE America Act could not come at a more important time, and he is exactly right because Americans are tired of watching politicians talk about election integrity while refusing to do the hard work required to actually secure the system. Burchett made it clear on The Big Weekend Show that Republicans need to do everything possible to pass this legislation, because voters deserve elections that are easy for legal citizens to participate in and impossible for anyone else to exploit. That should not be controversial. Citizenship verification should not be controversial. Voter ID should not be controversial. Clean voter rolls should not be controversial. But somehow Washington keeps acting like basic safeguards are too difficult, too risky, or too politically uncomfortable to fight for, even while cities like New York are showing exactly how fast political shifts can change the future of the country. Republicans have the issue, the voters, and the mandate. Now they need the backbone. Pass the SAVE America Act and stop making excuses. 🇺🇸🔥

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

52,962 views • 1 month ago

French President Macron on social media: We must go further in the regulation of social media in order to preserve the DNA of our democracy. Because at the same time, we are opening Pandora’s box and allowing a lot of hate speech on these platforms and social media. We are too weak and too naive. And we should ask these platforms, first, to completely block bots. We have to be sure there is one single person with one account. If this is an AI system, if this is bought and organized by a big organization, it should simply be forbidden. We need transparency of the algorithm. We are a democracy. We don’t ask for the IP, but we do ask for transparency, which is part of our democracy. We need responsibility from these platforms when they don’t respect our social order, when they don’t respect our rules. And to allow us to do so, we have to go further in order to sue those who clearly decide not to respect our rules and our regulation. And we should block all those who refuse to comply.

French President Macron on social media: We must go further in the regulation of social media in order to preserve the DNA of our democracy. Because at the same time, we are opening Pandora’s box and allowing a lot of hate speech on these platforms and social media. We are too weak and too naive. And we should ask these platforms, first, to completely block bots. We have to be sure there is one single person with one account. If this is an AI system, if this is bought and organized by a big organization, it should simply be forbidden. We need transparency of the algorithm. We are a democracy. We don’t ask for the IP, but we do ask for transparency, which is part of our democracy. We need responsibility from these platforms when they don’t respect our social order, when they don’t respect our rules. And to allow us to do so, we have to go further in order to sue those who clearly decide not to respect our rules and our regulation. And we should block all those who refuse to comply.

Clash Report

26,414 views • 6 months ago

🚨 13 years of work gone overnight. 🚨 Can we please get help TeamYouTube? As some of you know, I live with chronic illness, specifically Crohn’s disease. That means there’s only so much stress my body can take before it completely shuts down. For over a decade, this channel was more than just content. It was something I built through the hardest days. When I couldn’t do much else, I worked on this. It gave me purpose, stability, and a reason to keep moving forward. And now, it’s all gone. My channel was flagged for “harmful content involving minors” and “sexual abuse” claims that are simply not true. There was no warning, no clear explanation, and no access to real human support. Just like that, everything disappeared. I’m exhausted and I know I’m not the only creator going through this right now. Putting in the effort to keep creating while managing a chronic illness is already a challenge. To have everything taken away like this is heartbreaking. What’s the value of recognizing, verifying, or even awarding creators if their work can be erased instantly without a proper review? I’m asking for a human review of my channel. This isn’t just a collection of videos. It represents 13 years of dedication and one of YouTube’s largest historical archives. And I’m not alone. Over 200 creators have reported being demonetized or removed under vague policy labels such as: • “Harmful content involving minors” • “Misleading Family Content” • “Content related to sexual abuse” Why is educational content no longer being protected?

🚨 13 years of work gone overnight. 🚨 Can we please get help TeamYouTube? As some of you know, I live with chronic illness, specifically Crohn’s disease. That means there’s only so much stress my body can take before it completely shuts down. For over a decade, this channel was more than just content. It was something I built through the hardest days. When I couldn’t do much else, I worked on this. It gave me purpose, stability, and a reason to keep moving forward. And now, it’s all gone. My channel was flagged for “harmful content involving minors” and “sexual abuse” claims that are simply not true. There was no warning, no clear explanation, and no access to real human support. Just like that, everything disappeared. I’m exhausted and I know I’m not the only creator going through this right now. Putting in the effort to keep creating while managing a chronic illness is already a challenge. To have everything taken away like this is heartbreaking. What’s the value of recognizing, verifying, or even awarding creators if their work can be erased instantly without a proper review? I’m asking for a human review of my channel. This isn’t just a collection of videos. It represents 13 years of dedication and one of YouTube’s largest historical archives. And I’m not alone. Over 200 creators have reported being demonetized or removed under vague policy labels such as: • “Harmful content involving minors” • “Misleading Family Content” • “Content related to sexual abuse” Why is educational content no longer being protected?

Panzerpicture

50,208 views • 4 months ago

Here are my solutions for the border. Keep in mind that I realize there is no exact science here and no fool-proof solution. - Immigration must be opened up. More people should be able to come here legally, seek work here, and raise children here. - No we don’t need a wall from sea to shining sea. We do need more fencing/wall built though in areas where it makes sense. - The walls need to be much more difficult to climb over and tunnel under, and they must be equipped with modern technology and reinforced with border agents every 1/2 mile or so where feasible. - Fencing should extend deep into the ground where possible. Every inch of wall should be monitored with cameras mounted in a way that makes them impossible to be damaged. No fence is fool-proof but they can definitely be better than what Trump built and what we’ve been building for years. - In areas where there is no fencing — most notably in areas where the land is owned by Americans and around obstacles like the Rio Grande, we should exponentially hire additional border agents and utilize more cameras and more video. We should work with Mexico to to create a neutral zone currently in Mexico to allow US agents to patrol as well, or make sure that Mexico is patrolling those areas up to our standards. - Every single person looking to come into America should be required to show some sort of legitimate reason to seek asylum before even being granted access. If they don’t have one that can be shown or proven immediately, there needs to be a process for them to do so within their own country and within Mexico, but with a caveat: The US should man special safe asylum centers in various Central and South American countries, as well as in Mexico. American citizens should run these centers, and asylum judges should be stationed there to expedite the process. The asylum seekers should be fed and cared for during the time they are there. Massive amounts of asylum judges and border agents need to be hired. I can’t reiterate this enough. We need a lot of funding and training for this. - Every person seeking asylum should be recorded through a biometric system so that repeated attempts can quickly and easily be identified. Thoughts?

Here are my solutions for the border. Keep in mind that I realize there is no exact science here and no fool-proof solution. - Immigration must be opened up. More people should be able to come here legally, seek work here, and raise children here. - No we don’t need a wall from sea to shining sea. We do need more fencing/wall built though in areas where it makes sense. - The walls need to be much more difficult to climb over and tunnel under, and they must be equipped with modern technology and reinforced with border agents every 1/2 mile or so where feasible. - Fencing should extend deep into the ground where possible. Every inch of wall should be monitored with cameras mounted in a way that makes them impossible to be damaged. No fence is fool-proof but they can definitely be better than what Trump built and what we’ve been building for years. - In areas where there is no fencing — most notably in areas where the land is owned by Americans and around obstacles like the Rio Grande, we should exponentially hire additional border agents and utilize more cameras and more video. We should work with Mexico to to create a neutral zone currently in Mexico to allow US agents to patrol as well, or make sure that Mexico is patrolling those areas up to our standards. - Every single person looking to come into America should be required to show some sort of legitimate reason to seek asylum before even being granted access. If they don’t have one that can be shown or proven immediately, there needs to be a process for them to do so within their own country and within Mexico, but with a caveat: The US should man special safe asylum centers in various Central and South American countries, as well as in Mexico. American citizens should run these centers, and asylum judges should be stationed there to expedite the process. The asylum seekers should be fed and cared for during the time they are there. Massive amounts of asylum judges and border agents need to be hired. I can’t reiterate this enough. We need a lot of funding and training for this. - Every person seeking asylum should be recorded through a biometric system so that repeated attempts can quickly and easily be identified. Thoughts?

Ed Krassenstein

1,099,788 views • 2 years ago