Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn't)...now they have to be punished." China is a target for one reason and one reason only: China refused to develop its economy to resemble a colony of Washington. Instead... it developed its economy to staggering heights with an alternative economic system, showing the world that American capitalism is not the only model for development left in the world after the collapse of Soviet communism. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, China refused to bend the knee to Washington’s hegemonic diktats. The US would rather go to war with China rather than allow it to surpass it economically, and any country that doesn’t obey US diktats is viewed as an enemy.show more

Afshin Rattansi

122,045 subscribers

380,783 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The US expected China to develop just enough to join the rest of the subservient world, says Prof Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University. But China instead "managed economic development better than just about any place in world history". So the US is looking to a military option

The US expected China to develop just enough to join the rest of the subservient world, says Prof Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University. But China instead "managed economic development better than just about any place in world history". So the US is looking to a military option

Nury Vittachi

151,357 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: ‘China🇨🇳 is bigger than the US🇺🇸 economy, that’s not a myth that’s a reality. China is far bigger in industrial capacity. China is ahead of the United States on many technologies… It will dominate electric vehicles for 20 years to come. It will absolutely dominate solar power production.

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: ‘China🇨🇳 is bigger than the US🇺🇸 economy, that’s not a myth that’s a reality. China is far bigger in industrial capacity. China is ahead of the United States on many technologies… It will dominate electric vehicles for 20 years to come. It will absolutely dominate solar power production.

Afshin Rattansi

35,672 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: ‘China🇨🇳 is bigger than the US🇺🇸 economy, that’s not a myth that’s a reality. China is far bigger in industrial capacity. China is ahead of the United States on many technologies… It will dominate electric vehicles for 20 years to come. It will absolutely dominate solar power production.

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: ‘China🇨🇳 is bigger than the US🇺🇸 economy, that’s not a myth that’s a reality. China is far bigger in industrial capacity. China is ahead of the United States on many technologies… It will dominate electric vehicles for 20 years to come. It will absolutely dominate solar power production.

Going Underground

70,735 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: ‘China🇨🇳 is bigger than the US🇺🇸 economy, that’s not a myth that’s a reality. China is far bigger in industrial capacity. China is ahead of the United States on many technologies… It will dominate electric vehicles for 20 years to come. It will absolutely dominate solar power production.

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: ‘China🇨🇳 is bigger than the US🇺🇸 economy, that’s not a myth that’s a reality. China is far bigger in industrial capacity. China is ahead of the United States on many technologies… It will dominate electric vehicles for 20 years to come. It will absolutely dominate solar power production.

Afshin Rattansi

45,669 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Peter Schiff explains why China🇨🇳 is BEATING the United States🇺🇸 'Chinese government interference in their economy is not the reason that China is doing well. It's the fact that they've allowed capitalism into the system. It was when they started moving away from complete central government planning, they allowed elements of a market-based economy to enter the Chinese economic system. And the problem in America is that we've lost too much of our capitalism. So we started with a lot more capitalism and now we have a lot less. And China started with no capitalism and now they have a lot more. We're going all in on these socialist programmes and China is not. So in many respects, there's more capitalism in China than there is in the United States. That is the reason for the Chinese success.' -Peter Schiff, Host of 'The Peter Schiff Show' on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Peter Schiff

Peter Schiff explains why China🇨🇳 is BEATING the United States🇺🇸 'Chinese government interference in their economy is not the reason that China is doing well. It's the fact that they've allowed capitalism into the system. It was when they started moving away from complete central government planning, they allowed elements of a market-based economy to enter the Chinese economic system. And the problem in America is that we've lost too much of our capitalism. So we started with a lot more capitalism and now we have a lot less. And China started with no capitalism and now they have a lot more. We're going all in on these socialist programmes and China is not. So in many respects, there's more capitalism in China than there is in the United States. That is the reason for the Chinese success.' -Peter Schiff, Host of 'The Peter Schiff Show' on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Peter Schiff

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

322,124 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Former World Bank Lead Economist calls for China🇨🇳 to TEACH its economic model to the world after its SUCCESS: ‘The advantage of the Washington Consensus was that it was very simple and in some aspects it was exaggerated and wrong, but it was simple and you could understand it. Chinese economists and economists working on China should be able to come to some consensus of essential policy changes that can be learned from China, and basically create a model that could be implemented in other countries. It's not imperialism…if a country has been successful economically, that country actually should sell its economic model. It's not only because that country would have greater influence. It would help the world by teaching them.’ —Branko Milanovic on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇

Former World Bank Lead Economist calls for China🇨🇳 to TEACH its economic model to the world after its SUCCESS: ‘The advantage of the Washington Consensus was that it was very simple and in some aspects it was exaggerated and wrong, but it was simple and you could understand it. Chinese economists and economists working on China should be able to come to some consensus of essential policy changes that can be learned from China, and basically create a model that could be implemented in other countries. It's not imperialism…if a country has been successful economically, that country actually should sell its economic model. It's not only because that country would have greater influence. It would help the world by teaching them.’ —Branko Milanovic on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇

Going Underground

48,877 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

Global Strategy

91,558 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...

Brian Berletic

103,132 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,499 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

Predictive History

24,046 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Whenever an iPhone is shipped from China to the United States, it is recorded by the US government as a "Chinese export". However, in reality, China only earns about 3.6% from this iPhone worth thousands of dollars. The claim that "China has stolen US manufacturing" is not substantiated. After World War II, the United States was not only a driver of globalization but also the biggest beneficiary - outsourcing low-end manufacturing through the "smiling curve", focusing on high value-added industries, and strengthening its financial dominance through the power of the US dollar. Research has shown that globalization only changes the structure of employment, not the total quantity of jobs. The real problem lies in the government's failure to properly support those left behind. It is time for the United States to reflect on its own responsibilities, rather than blaming other countries.

Whenever an iPhone is shipped from China to the United States, it is recorded by the US government as a "Chinese export". However, in reality, China only earns about 3.6% from this iPhone worth thousands of dollars. The claim that "China has stolen US manufacturing" is not substantiated. After World War II, the United States was not only a driver of globalization but also the biggest beneficiary - outsourcing low-end manufacturing through the "smiling curve", focusing on high value-added industries, and strengthening its financial dominance through the power of the US dollar. Research has shown that globalization only changes the structure of employment, not the total quantity of jobs. The real problem lies in the government's failure to properly support those left behind. It is time for the United States to reflect on its own responsibilities, rather than blaming other countries.

Johannes Maria

22,930 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

19,076 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨WAR ON IRAN IS PART OF THE PLAN AGAINST CHINA🇨🇳 ‘I think there’s a more serious plan which is to make it impossible for Iran as a sovereign state to negotiate and sell oil and gas directly to China.’ ‘The US would like to be the power that determines to whom energy is sold and under what conditions. It’s part of their big plan to surround and lay siege to China…they are concerned and worried about the development of China as a major economic power and they want to control it. So in my opinion, the threats against Iran are more to do with that than anything else.’ -Tariq Ali on Going Underground

🚨WAR ON IRAN IS PART OF THE PLAN AGAINST CHINA🇨🇳 ‘I think there’s a more serious plan which is to make it impossible for Iran as a sovereign state to negotiate and sell oil and gas directly to China.’ ‘The US would like to be the power that determines to whom energy is sold and under what conditions. It’s part of their big plan to surround and lay siege to China…they are concerned and worried about the development of China as a major economic power and they want to control it. So in my opinion, the threats against Iran are more to do with that than anything else.’ -Tariq Ali on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

95,077 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Trump Admin is up a creek without a paddle, as they try to sell an "economic war" against Iran after they failed to bomb the country into submission. China immediately refused US demands to cut off trade with Iran. A reminder that the US is only isolating itself here...

The Trump Admin is up a creek without a paddle, as they try to sell an "economic war" against Iran after they failed to bomb the country into submission. China immediately refused US demands to cut off trade with Iran. A reminder that the US is only isolating itself here...

Rachel Blevins

31,027 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Prof. Sachs: Europe has made a huge mistake thinking that somehow the US is its protector. I have tried to explain over the years that the United States is neither a protector nor a friend for Europe, and that Europe needs to have its own independent policy and NOT TO BE, in conflict with Russia or with China, for that matter.

Prof. Sachs: Europe has made a huge mistake thinking that somehow the US is its protector. I have tried to explain over the years that the United States is neither a protector nor a friend for Europe, and that Europe needs to have its own independent policy and NOT TO BE, in conflict with Russia or with China, for that matter.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

74,701 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Argentina's Milei: The United States does trade with China, and the way we see it, China is a great trading partner. It means a lot of opportunities for us to expand markets, so that is not any source of conflict.

Argentina's Milei: The United States does trade with China, and the way we see it, China is a great trading partner. It means a lot of opportunities for us to expand markets, so that is not any source of conflict.

Clash Report

38,170 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

American economist Richard Wolff: 'Britain, France, Germany, Japan, and Russia were destroyed in the war. The United States emerged and, for the rest of the 20th century, was the absolute number one economic power in the world. We got used to it. It's not surprising, but it's over. There is now a real competitor. There is another part of the world economy. It's called China and its allies, also known as the BRICS, versus the United States and our allies, known as the G7. The BRICS and China are already a larger, wealthier economic power than the United States and the G7 combined. That is a world-changing reorganisation of the world. Every country in the world is adjusting to this new reality.'

American economist Richard Wolff: 'Britain, France, Germany, Japan, and Russia were destroyed in the war. The United States emerged and, for the rest of the 20th century, was the absolute number one economic power in the world. We got used to it. It's not surprising, but it's over. There is now a real competitor. There is another part of the world economy. It's called China and its allies, also known as the BRICS, versus the United States and our allies, known as the G7. The BRICS and China are already a larger, wealthier economic power than the United States and the G7 combined. That is a world-changing reorganisation of the world. Every country in the world is adjusting to this new reality.'

Going Underground

25,617 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen