Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

PROFESSOR MARANDI ON US USING A NUCLEAR WEAPON: UNITED STATES USING A NUCLEAR WEAPON WOULD HAVE ENORMOUS NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR ITSELF “If the United States did something so IDIOTIC and EVIL, it would cause countries across the world to develop nuclear weapons — it would cause IRAN to develop... show more

Sulaiman Ahmed

846,333 subscribers

26,479 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

MondoARG1 day ago

I have run simulations on this. It would crash the USD because the US would no longer be seen as a rational actor.

Werner Brotke1 day ago

And it would call the strategy of deterrence into question and put pressure on all of the world’s nuclear powers to use a nuclear bomb as well. After all, the mere possession of nuclear weapons is no longer a deterrent if only one side actually uses them.

D_S1 day ago

Having is the only way US/i$rael will stop bombing & killing innocent families

🎒memenoonmeme | زراد خان 🟩☫🟥🍉1 day ago

So? What about Iran and the dead civilians?! Marandi is way off mark with his victimhood.

Aarzoo1 day ago

Why not now before they killed your hundred thousand of your people you guys are beyond imagination 🤦

Jason M. Williams 🇺🇸1 day ago

🔱Pls advise if this helps:

Aaron Mend1 day ago

Marandi lecturing the world on proliferation is comedy. The IAEA Board formally found Iran in breach of its safeguards obligations in June 2025. The arms race he's warning about is the one his regime started.

Bosco N Epictetus Student1 day ago

Humanity doesn't need to destroy itself to understand its own evil. The horror of nuclear weapons is already written in history. If we truly understand what we are capable of, then wisdom demands that next time, we choose cooperation instead of conflict.

World Politics1 day ago

Iran shouldn’t wait for 🇺🇸🇮🇱 to nuke us to build one. We can’t risk being in this state for too long. There is no other way than ⬆️ Iran’s deterrence now. We should have done it 3 years ago. If Iran could have ⬆️ deterrence undetected & didn’t act till now it was a big mistake.

rash1 day ago

Irgc mouth piece all they do is talk.

Related Videos

The sheer arrogance of the United States in forbidding other sovereign countries from having nuclear weapons is truly stunning. If Iran already had nuclear weapons, the United States and Israel would never have attacked it, and there would be no war. Having nuclear weapons is the only real deterrent to keep countries like Israel and the United States off your back.

The sheer arrogance of the United States in forbidding other sovereign countries from having nuclear weapons is truly stunning. If Iran already had nuclear weapons, the United States and Israel would never have attacked it, and there would be no war. Having nuclear weapons is the only real deterrent to keep countries like Israel and the United States off your back.

Richard

68,819 views • 6 months ago

Trump: If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, it would blow Italy up in two minutes Italy PM: Nine nations have nuclear weapons and only one has used it. That one is the United States of America.

Trump: If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, it would blow Italy up in two minutes Italy PM: Nine nations have nuclear weapons and only one has used it. That one is the United States of America.

Jvnior

1,987,118 views • 6 months ago

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Clash Report

46,958 views • 4 months ago

"Was Iran developing a nuclear weapon prior to our military action last June and did Iran remain committed to developing a nuclear weapon in the lead-up to this conflict?" CIA Director John Ratcliffe: Yes "If left unchecked, do you think Iran would have the ability to develop missiles capable of reaching the United States?" CIA Director John Ratcliffe: "Yes."

"Was Iran developing a nuclear weapon prior to our military action last June and did Iran remain committed to developing a nuclear weapon in the lead-up to this conflict?" CIA Director John Ratcliffe: Yes "If left unchecked, do you think Iran would have the ability to develop missiles capable of reaching the United States?" CIA Director John Ratcliffe: "Yes."

Rapid Response 47

475,612 views • 7 months ago

‘It’s not just that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, it’s what would happen if the Iranians did get a nuclear weapon’ — Vance ‘A lot of nations all across the Gulf would then want their own nuclear weapon and then a lot of nations all across the world’

‘It’s not just that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, it’s what would happen if the Iranians did get a nuclear weapon’ — Vance ‘A lot of nations all across the Gulf would then want their own nuclear weapon and then a lot of nations all across the world’

RT

35,181 views • 5 months ago

Professor John Mearsheimer: Israel may ultimately use nuclear weapons against Iran. It is now clear that Israel cannot prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons using its conventional forces. That option does not work. The only option they have left is nuclear weapons. The United States will not stop it.

Professor John Mearsheimer: Israel may ultimately use nuclear weapons against Iran. It is now clear that Israel cannot prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons using its conventional forces. That option does not work. The only option they have left is nuclear weapons. The United States will not stop it.

Clash Report

158,221 views • 7 months ago

Donald Trump: “Iran could have destroyed Italy with nuclear weapons in 3 minutes if it wanted to.” FACT: There are 9 countries in the world with nuclear weapons, and the only country that has used them is the United States.

Donald Trump: “Iran could have destroyed Italy with nuclear weapons in 3 minutes if it wanted to.” FACT: There are 9 countries in the world with nuclear weapons, and the only country that has used them is the United States.

IR Media 24

13,668 views • 6 months ago

Professor Mohammad Marandi, Iranian academic, on what would happen if Trump decides to use a nuclear weapon on Iran

Professor Mohammad Marandi, Iranian academic, on what would happen if Trump decides to use a nuclear weapon on Iran

barbarism critic

147,760 views • 7 months ago

What would happen if America used a nuclear weapon against Iran? Iranian media are reportedly informing citizens how to protect themselves in the event of a nuclear attack, reflecting growing concern amid escalating tensions. Attention has focused on Pickaxe Mountain, where Iran is believed to have deeply buried underground nuclear facilities. Speculation suggests that destroying such sites with conventional weapons could be extremely difficult, fuelling questions about whether the US might consider a tactical nuclear weapon. However, there is no confirmed evidence that the United States has decided to use a nuclear weapon against Iran. Any discussion of a tactical nuclear strike remains speculation. #iran #IranWar #nuclear #Trump #NuclearAttack #Nuclearweapon

What would happen if America used a nuclear weapon against Iran? Iranian media are reportedly informing citizens how to protect themselves in the event of a nuclear attack, reflecting growing concern amid escalating tensions. Attention has focused on Pickaxe Mountain, where Iran is believed to have deeply buried underground nuclear facilities. Speculation suggests that destroying such sites with conventional weapons could be extremely difficult, fuelling questions about whether the US might consider a tactical nuclear weapon. However, there is no confirmed evidence that the United States has decided to use a nuclear weapon against Iran. Any discussion of a tactical nuclear strike remains speculation. #iran #IranWar #nuclear #Trump #NuclearAttack #Nuclearweapon

Srijan Pal Singh

19,070 views • 11 days ago

BREAKING: TRUMP CLAIMS PEOPLE WOULD RATHER HAVE HIGH GAS PRICES OVER IRAN HAVING A NUCLEAR WEAPON “If they had a vote on lower gas prices or letting Iran have a nuclear weapon, it would be a massive landslide. People don’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.”

BREAKING: TRUMP CLAIMS PEOPLE WOULD RATHER HAVE HIGH GAS PRICES OVER IRAN HAVING A NUCLEAR WEAPON “If they had a vote on lower gas prices or letting Iran have a nuclear weapon, it would be a massive landslide. People don’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.”

Sulaiman Ahmed

98,539 views • 1 month ago

Told Al Jazeera English that two nuclear weapons states have bombed a non-nuclear weapons state, without having been attacked. This will send shockwaves throughout the world, and more countries will conclude that they will need nuclear weapons to deter existing nuclear weapons states.

Told Al Jazeera English that two nuclear weapons states have bombed a non-nuclear weapons state, without having been attacked. This will send shockwaves throughout the world, and more countries will conclude that they will need nuclear weapons to deter existing nuclear weapons states.

Trita Parsi

414,363 views • 1 year ago

Vice President JD Vance on Iran: "It's not just that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, it's what would happen if the Iranians did get a nuke. A lot of nations across the Gulf would want a nuclear weapon and then a lot of nations all across the world."

Vice President JD Vance on Iran: "It's not just that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, it's what would happen if the Iranians did get a nuke. A lot of nations across the Gulf would want a nuclear weapon and then a lot of nations all across the world."

The American Conservative

15,391 views • 5 months ago

U.S. President Donald J. Trump confirms that negotiations are currently ongoing with Iran, but reiterates that they cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon, claiming that if Iran were able to manufacture such a weapon there would be nuclear war in the Middle East, Europe, and the United States.

U.S. President Donald J. Trump confirms that negotiations are currently ongoing with Iran, but reiterates that they cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon, claiming that if Iran were able to manufacture such a weapon there would be nuclear war in the Middle East, Europe, and the United States.

OSINTdefender

117,316 views • 5 months ago

NBC: Is it worth losing the midterms if the result is a non-nuclear Iran? Lindsey Graham: It's worth losing my job. If I had to give my job up to make sure Iran would never have a nuclear weapon, I would do it. I believe there are religious Nazis in Iran. If they had a nuclear weapon, they would use it.

NBC: Is it worth losing the midterms if the result is a non-nuclear Iran? Lindsey Graham: It's worth losing my job. If I had to give my job up to make sure Iran would never have a nuclear weapon, I would do it. I believe there are religious Nazis in Iran. If they had a nuclear weapon, they would use it.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

150,708 views • 5 months ago

"We have to have guarantees they will never have a nuclear weapon," says President Donald J. Trump on Iran. "Iran would use the nuclear weapon if they had it... And we're not going to give them a chance to do it."

"We have to have guarantees they will never have a nuclear weapon," says President Donald J. Trump on Iran. "Iran would use the nuclear weapon if they had it... And we're not going to give them a chance to do it."

Rapid Response 47

141,362 views • 6 months ago