Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Professor Retsef Levi explains his perspective on thimerosal (mercury) in influenza vaccines: "If you just think about a one-time vaccine, you could argue that the amount of mercury in a single dose of a single vaccine is probably small. And you could argue potentially that it poses no significant... risks. The problem is that you don't take one shot. You take, actually, a shot every year, and moreover, you are actually being exposed to mercury from other sources in your life - from food, from fish, & from other sources. So, when you want to consider risk here, you need to adopt a system-level kind of thinking and really think about not only this isolated episode, but rather what is the overall contribution to the overall risk, to the overall exposure. And if you do that, given the fact that mercury is a highly toxic compound - nobody debates that - and it accumulates in the body, I think it's going to be sensible, at least in my mind, to say that if we can eliminate some controllable sources of mercury, we should do that." CC Robert W Malone, MDshow more

Jan Jekielek

195,908 subscribers

56,130 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Наука и технологии Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Jan Jekielek

Jan Jekielek1 год назад

"One of the exciting aspects of becoming a member of ACIP is the opportunity to work with the CDC staff & other academics to really pursue together the truth based on the data." - Professor @RetsefL on his and Dr. @RWMaloneMD's new roles advising the CDC.

Фото профиля John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓1 год назад

Can Professor @RetsefL explain the rationale for partnering with Moderna when there was only one guy dead, and 44 cases on earth? If there were 4,000+ Americans dying weekly from Influenza, why would we need SARS-COV2 vaccines on January 13, 2020? It was only identified 4 days earlier. There weren't 50 cases on earth. We didn't even know if it was contagious. Is Professor @RetsefL certain that we didn't order Moderna's mRNA-1851 for H7N9? COVID was a CIA cover-up of the worst bird flu pandemic in human history. H7N9.

Фото профиля John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓1 год назад

@RetsefL Has Professor @RetsefL explained the global disappearance of Influenza? Has he heard any theories that make sense? Did he read my whitepaper?

Фото профиля lisadmassad

lisadmassad1 год назад

@RetsefL The reason the metal was inserted in vxs-do ppl understand that?? Trick immune system to attack? Maybe a better response other than inserting metal to the brain is needed.

Фото профиля Mark Deneen

Mark Deneen1 год назад

@RWMaloneMD @RetsefL Whenever profits can be driven by politics "sensible" goes out the window.

Фото профиля cancerclasses

cancerclasses1 год назад

@RetsefL The problem is people conditioned to be STOOPID FRAIDY CAT CHICKEN LITTLES & take a toxic LETHAL "vaccine" EVERY YEAR *AS IF* they 💯% WILL get the flu & WILL DIE if they don't take it, when there's NO guarantee they'll even get the flu ANY YEAR or die from it when most DON'T.

Фото профиля elaine stokes

elaine stokes1 год назад

@RetsefL How many people have said that these moronic doctors at wellness checks are giving up to seven jabs at the same time. Talk about an upload. Add all that damn mercury up and see where that gets you.

Фото профиля Clarence Beeks, Crop Report Specialist

Clarence Beeks, Crop Report Specialist1 год назад

@RetsefL Why is there ANY mercury in ANY vaccine? What purpose does it serve? Jus' askin'.

Фото профиля SugarsNoSnowflake

SugarsNoSnowflake1 год назад

@RetsefL I think the most important question here is...why does this vaccine contain mercury in the first place?

Фото профиля Talk to me Goose

Talk to me Goose1 год назад

@RWMaloneMD @RetsefL Normal people do not at all need influenza vaccine. Influenza is mandatperioden training for the immune system. No matter what anybody say…. Stay at least 300 meter away from any mRMA products and Globalist politician asshole.

Похожие видео

Dr. Robert W Malone, MD explains to me why he voted to recommend the removal of thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative, from influenza vaccines during the recent CDC advisory panel meeting: "97% of all influenza vaccines currently administered in the United States are administered using single dose vials. That means that it comes in a little vial and it's got the rubber nib at the top, and the physician puts the syringe and the needle into that, draws out that one dose, hopefully changes the needle otherwise the needle's a little dull and it hurts more, and then administers it to the child or the adult. What that does is it minimizes the chance of introducing contamination by going through that rubber stopper - that nib, again and again and again, which is what you do with a multi-dose vial. So multi-dose vials are a little bit cheaper, but they are considerably more risky in terms of introducing contaminants into the jar that then get drawn out and injected into another patient. That could be a virus like Hepatitis B, it could be a bacterial contamination, it could be a fungal contamination, etc, etc. So, that's why in a multi-dose vial you have to put in some sort of preservative—and there are other approved preservatives other than thimerosal. So, in the interest of doing our best at this stage to take another move forward in eliminating the added dose of mercury to patients that receive an influenza vaccine - remember that they're going to get a vaccine every year, and the people that get it from a multi-dose vial today are likely to be the same ones that get from a multi-dose vial next year. So, the mercury doesn't get excreted very well. There is a cumulative effect. And so, the [ACIP] committee, I think wisely, voted to just say no to thimerosal containing multi-dose vials. Now, for some reason, the pharmaceutical industry and corporate media see this as some sort of existential threat - that eliminating 3% of the influenza doses that contain thimerosal is a crisis for the entire vaccine industry and their academic and media supporters. I don't get it, but that seems to be the meme, and the strange thing is that it has left media and pharma arguing in favor of injecting mercury into Americans. It just is horrible optics, it's not the right decision, and I think I applaud the committee for having the temerity to just say no."

Dr. Robert W Malone, MD explains to me why he voted to recommend the removal of thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative, from influenza vaccines during the recent CDC advisory panel meeting: "97% of all influenza vaccines currently administered in the United States are administered using single dose vials. That means that it comes in a little vial and it's got the rubber nib at the top, and the physician puts the syringe and the needle into that, draws out that one dose, hopefully changes the needle otherwise the needle's a little dull and it hurts more, and then administers it to the child or the adult. What that does is it minimizes the chance of introducing contamination by going through that rubber stopper - that nib, again and again and again, which is what you do with a multi-dose vial. So multi-dose vials are a little bit cheaper, but they are considerably more risky in terms of introducing contaminants into the jar that then get drawn out and injected into another patient. That could be a virus like Hepatitis B, it could be a bacterial contamination, it could be a fungal contamination, etc, etc. So, that's why in a multi-dose vial you have to put in some sort of preservative—and there are other approved preservatives other than thimerosal. So, in the interest of doing our best at this stage to take another move forward in eliminating the added dose of mercury to patients that receive an influenza vaccine - remember that they're going to get a vaccine every year, and the people that get it from a multi-dose vial today are likely to be the same ones that get from a multi-dose vial next year. So, the mercury doesn't get excreted very well. There is a cumulative effect. And so, the [ACIP] committee, I think wisely, voted to just say no to thimerosal containing multi-dose vials. Now, for some reason, the pharmaceutical industry and corporate media see this as some sort of existential threat - that eliminating 3% of the influenza doses that contain thimerosal is a crisis for the entire vaccine industry and their academic and media supporters. I don't get it, but that seems to be the meme, and the strange thing is that it has left media and pharma arguing in favor of injecting mercury into Americans. It just is horrible optics, it's not the right decision, and I think I applaud the committee for having the temerity to just say no."

Jan Jekielek

69,666 просмотров • 1 год назад

HARD EVIDENCE THAT ALL VACCINES ARE POISON. EVERY SINGLE ONE! “Show them the thimerosal ... which we keep in a metal container because we're a little afraid of it, and it's a very fine powder. This is, this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic, has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system. Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff, and this is what's in the vaccine. It's important to realize we're talking about a whole range of products. Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it. For example, this is tetanus vaccine. This one expires. It's a lot dated now in 2007 here's the thimerosal. One to 10,000 is a preservative. Perhaps the the biggest one in the US, at least that's for exposure to mercury is the influenza vaccine. Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children, on a yearly basis. You're supposed... understand that thimerosal is not added at the end. It's not like, well, that factory next year can make thimerosal free. Thimerosal, you either have to have a thimerosal free factory, or you have to not have one. They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile. So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory where you don't need thimerosal, or you have to have one that produces thimerosal. It's going to need thimerosal or something the whole time it needs to be stopped. This is the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pastor, their flu zone, thimerosal, 25 micrograms ofd mercury per dose. ... I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and I'm one of them. I've given 2000 RhoGAM shots. I've been in vaccines for 35 years. I didn't know that RhoGAM had Thimerosal in it, so I think a lot of the doctors were unaware. They were unaware that even the word thimerosal meant mercury.” Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccine Neurodevelopment Disorders, on Heart Disease in the United States (Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 8 Number 1 Spring 2003): President Trump Post on TruthSocial: Original Video: THEY POISONED US FOR 40 YEARS CALLED IT AIDS CANCER AND COVID: THE TETANUS MYTH AND THE TRUE NATURAL REMEDIES:

HARD EVIDENCE THAT ALL VACCINES ARE POISON. EVERY SINGLE ONE! “Show them the thimerosal ... which we keep in a metal container because we're a little afraid of it, and it's a very fine powder. This is, this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic, has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system. Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff, and this is what's in the vaccine. It's important to realize we're talking about a whole range of products. Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it. For example, this is tetanus vaccine. This one expires. It's a lot dated now in 2007 here's the thimerosal. One to 10,000 is a preservative. Perhaps the the biggest one in the US, at least that's for exposure to mercury is the influenza vaccine. Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children, on a yearly basis. You're supposed... understand that thimerosal is not added at the end. It's not like, well, that factory next year can make thimerosal free. Thimerosal, you either have to have a thimerosal free factory, or you have to not have one. They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile. So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory where you don't need thimerosal, or you have to have one that produces thimerosal. It's going to need thimerosal or something the whole time it needs to be stopped. This is the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pastor, their flu zone, thimerosal, 25 micrograms ofd mercury per dose. ... I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and I'm one of them. I've given 2000 RhoGAM shots. I've been in vaccines for 35 years. I didn't know that RhoGAM had Thimerosal in it, so I think a lot of the doctors were unaware. They were unaware that even the word thimerosal meant mercury.” Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccine Neurodevelopment Disorders, on Heart Disease in the United States (Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 8 Number 1 Spring 2003): President Trump Post on TruthSocial: Original Video: THEY POISONED US FOR 40 YEARS CALLED IT AIDS CANCER AND COVID: THE TETANUS MYTH AND THE TRUE NATURAL REMEDIES:

Judy A. Mikovits PhD

31,847 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Trump: We want no mercury in the vaccine. We want no aluminum any in the vaccine. The M.M.R. I think should be taken separately. This is based on what I feel. separately. It seems to be that when you mix them, there could with a problem.

Trump: We want no mercury in the vaccine. We want no aluminum any in the vaccine. The M.M.R. I think should be taken separately. This is based on what I feel. separately. It seems to be that when you mix them, there could with a problem.

Acyn

516,413 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

RFK Jr.’s new ACIP members today voted against thimerosal-containing vaccines. 🔥 Martin Kulldorf: "We know that Mercury is a toxin [the] FDA do not allow Mercury in skin products [and] if we put Mercury in a product, people are not going to want to buy that product [so if we want to have confidence in vaccines] we should remove this Mercury containing preservative"

RFK Jr.’s new ACIP members today voted against thimerosal-containing vaccines. 🔥 Martin Kulldorf: "We know that Mercury is a toxin [the] FDA do not allow Mercury in skin products [and] if we put Mercury in a product, people are not going to want to buy that product [so if we want to have confidence in vaccines] we should remove this Mercury containing preservative"

Humanspective

16,918 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇺🇸 SEC. RFK JR. CALLS ON ALL VACCINE MANUFACTURERS TO REMOVE MERCURY “Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative that has never undergone proper safety testing in humans. There is not a single study that proves it safe. It's inexcusable that governments around the world still allow mercury-based compounds in healthcare when safe alternatives exist. In July of this year, the United States closed the final chapter on the use of thimerosal as a vaccine preservative… Manufacturers have confirmed that they can produce mercury-free single-dose vaccines without interrupting supply. Now that America has removed mercury from all vaccines, I call on every global health authority…to do the same.” Source: Secretary Kennedy

🚨🇺🇸 SEC. RFK JR. CALLS ON ALL VACCINE MANUFACTURERS TO REMOVE MERCURY “Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative that has never undergone proper safety testing in humans. There is not a single study that proves it safe. It's inexcusable that governments around the world still allow mercury-based compounds in healthcare when safe alternatives exist. In July of this year, the United States closed the final chapter on the use of thimerosal as a vaccine preservative… Manufacturers have confirmed that they can produce mercury-free single-dose vaccines without interrupting supply. Now that America has removed mercury from all vaccines, I call on every global health authority…to do the same.” Source: Secretary Kennedy

Mario Nawfal

146,541 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The Great Lie of "Safe Mercury" in Vaccines, Exposed. They told you the mercury in vaccines is the "good" kind. They told you it leaves the body quickly. They told you it's safer than the mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. According to RFK Jr., they knew it was a lie. And he has the evidence. The claim that ethylmercury (Thimerosal) is rapidly excreted originated with its creator, Eli Lilly, in 1930—with zero scientific backing. Decades later, it became a mantra, seemingly validated by a 2003 CDC study (Pichichero) that showed mercury from vaccines vanishing from children's blood within days, while mercury from tuna remained for weeks. But world-renowned toxicologists asked the critical question: "Where did the ethylmercury go?" It wasn't in the blood, sweat, urine, or hair. So, the NIH commissioned a definitive monkey study (Burbacher). The results were damning: • The vaccine mercury did quickly clear the blood, just as in the children. • But when researchers examined the monkeys' brains, they made a shocking discovery. • The monkeys who received the vaccine-preservative mercury had MORE THAN DOUBLE the mercury in their brains compared to the tuna-fed monkeys. • Worse, the ethylmercury had metabolized into inorganic mercury, a highly toxic form that can persist in the brain for decades. The "good mercury" was not only staying in the body—it was targeting the brain more aggressively than its so-called "bad" counterpart. RFK Jr. recounts a recorded conversation with Dr. Paul Offit, a leading vaccine advocate, who repeated this "good mercury vs. bad mercury" fairytale. When confronted with the Burbacher monkey study, Offit fell silent, admitted the original study didn't prove the claim, and promised to "get back to him." He never did. The truth is mercury is cumulative. FDA internal studies have shown children receive mercury exposures from vaccines hundreds of times over safety limits. While industry defenders correctly state we are exposed to mercury from other environmental sources, injecting a potent neurotoxin directly into the bloodstream—one that crosses the blood-brain barrier and lodges itself there—is not a solution. It's a catastrophic part of the problem. This isn't a medical debate. It's a betrayal of public trust. The science has been clear for years, and they know it.

The Great Lie of "Safe Mercury" in Vaccines, Exposed. They told you the mercury in vaccines is the "good" kind. They told you it leaves the body quickly. They told you it's safer than the mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. According to RFK Jr., they knew it was a lie. And he has the evidence. The claim that ethylmercury (Thimerosal) is rapidly excreted originated with its creator, Eli Lilly, in 1930—with zero scientific backing. Decades later, it became a mantra, seemingly validated by a 2003 CDC study (Pichichero) that showed mercury from vaccines vanishing from children's blood within days, while mercury from tuna remained for weeks. But world-renowned toxicologists asked the critical question: "Where did the ethylmercury go?" It wasn't in the blood, sweat, urine, or hair. So, the NIH commissioned a definitive monkey study (Burbacher). The results were damning: • The vaccine mercury did quickly clear the blood, just as in the children. • But when researchers examined the monkeys' brains, they made a shocking discovery. • The monkeys who received the vaccine-preservative mercury had MORE THAN DOUBLE the mercury in their brains compared to the tuna-fed monkeys. • Worse, the ethylmercury had metabolized into inorganic mercury, a highly toxic form that can persist in the brain for decades. The "good mercury" was not only staying in the body—it was targeting the brain more aggressively than its so-called "bad" counterpart. RFK Jr. recounts a recorded conversation with Dr. Paul Offit, a leading vaccine advocate, who repeated this "good mercury vs. bad mercury" fairytale. When confronted with the Burbacher monkey study, Offit fell silent, admitted the original study didn't prove the claim, and promised to "get back to him." He never did. The truth is mercury is cumulative. FDA internal studies have shown children receive mercury exposures from vaccines hundreds of times over safety limits. While industry defenders correctly state we are exposed to mercury from other environmental sources, injecting a potent neurotoxin directly into the bloodstream—one that crosses the blood-brain barrier and lodges itself there—is not a solution. It's a catastrophic part of the problem. This isn't a medical debate. It's a betrayal of public trust. The science has been clear for years, and they know it.

Camus

80,662 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."

Brian Kight

308,812 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr.’s REAL position on vaccines, in his own words: “My position is that if you want a vaccine, you ought to be able to get a vaccine. But you ought to know the safety profile and the risk profile and the efficacy of that vaccine. That’s it.”

Holden Culotta

186,975 просмотров • 1 год назад

Reation to Florida vaccine mandate ending: Trump supports vaccine use, calls mandate 'tough stance' "Well, I think we have to be very careful. Look, you have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine, I happen to think is amazing." "A lot of people think that COVID is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that. But you have some vaccines that are so incredible." "And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very, you know, it's a very tough position. So I'd give you an answer." "I'll give you a feeling. But just initially, I heard about it yesterday and it's a tough stance. Look, you have vaccines that work, they just pure and simple work." "They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used. Otherwise, some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people." "And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take it."

Reation to Florida vaccine mandate ending: Trump supports vaccine use, calls mandate 'tough stance' "Well, I think we have to be very careful. Look, you have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine, I happen to think is amazing." "A lot of people think that COVID is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that. But you have some vaccines that are so incredible." "And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very, you know, it's a very tough position. So I'd give you an answer." "I'll give you a feeling. But just initially, I heard about it yesterday and it's a tough stance. Look, you have vaccines that work, they just pure and simple work." "They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used. Otherwise, some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people." "And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take it."

Camus

13,934 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jaynit

68,550 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"Can you say to me right now, that amount of mercury being injected into a baby will not hurt it?" William Egan, the FDA director, couldn't answer a single question about thimerosal definitively with science or specificity. Every response was without substance, behaving as a cagey lawyer trying to avoid saying something incriminating, protecting his criminal corporate masters that fund half of his agency and control it. The only safety study on thimerosal done in humans at the time, was done by the corporation Eli Lily back in 1929. What's even crazier, is that they only tested it 27 people who were already dying from meningitis, and every single one of them died in the trial. They didn't attribute the fatalities to the thimerosal of course, so that allowed them to add it to a bunch of vaccines without question. This is the kind of science the FDA required before allowing a vaccine containing mercury to be injected into your infant. It's criminal negligence. If you still trust the FDA/CDC and pharma when they say vaccines don't cause autism, you are dangerously delusional and have terrible discernment.

"Can you say to me right now, that amount of mercury being injected into a baby will not hurt it?" William Egan, the FDA director, couldn't answer a single question about thimerosal definitively with science or specificity. Every response was without substance, behaving as a cagey lawyer trying to avoid saying something incriminating, protecting his criminal corporate masters that fund half of his agency and control it. The only safety study on thimerosal done in humans at the time, was done by the corporation Eli Lily back in 1929. What's even crazier, is that they only tested it 27 people who were already dying from meningitis, and every single one of them died in the trial. They didn't attribute the fatalities to the thimerosal of course, so that allowed them to add it to a bunch of vaccines without question. This is the kind of science the FDA required before allowing a vaccine containing mercury to be injected into your infant. It's criminal negligence. If you still trust the FDA/CDC and pharma when they say vaccines don't cause autism, you are dangerously delusional and have terrible discernment.

Inversionism

258,742 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 WOW! HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. DROPS this line on an insufferable Democrat representative "If you want just a SOUNDBYTE that you can come in here, you can get that and you did it!" "But if you actually want to SOLVE the problem, call me — because we're aligned on the issue of getting good food to children and we think that we're doing a good job of it." "We could do a better job, but come and tell us how we can do a better job and that would be something we could all profit from."

🚨 WOW! HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. DROPS this line on an insufferable Democrat representative "If you want just a SOUNDBYTE that you can come in here, you can get that and you did it!" "But if you actually want to SOLVE the problem, call me — because we're aligned on the issue of getting good food to children and we think that we're doing a good job of it." "We could do a better job, but come and tell us how we can do a better job and that would be something we could all profit from."

Eric Daugherty

119,073 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.gorklon rust on what Department of Government Efficiency has found so far: "We do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there are quite a few -- people in, in the bureaucracy who, who have ostensibly a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while they are in that position, which is, you know, what happened at USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing, in which case we should take their investment advice perhaps, but just -- there seems to be mysteriously, they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where does it come from? And I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at taxpayer expense. That's -- that's the -- that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we're looking at, say, well, we would just -- if you look at, say, say Treasury, for example, basic controls that should be in place that are in place in any company, such as making sure that any given payment has a payment categorization code, that there is a comment field that describes the payment and if the payment is on the do not pay list, that you don't actually pay it. None of those things are true currently, so the reason that departments can't pass audits is because the payments don't have a categorization code. It's like just a massive number of blank checks just flying out the building. So you can't reconcile blank checks. You've got a comment fields that are also blank, so you don't know why the payment was made and then we've got this truly absurd a do not pay list, which can take up to a year for an organization to get on a do no pay list and we're talking about terrorist organizations. We're talking about, known fraudsters, known aspects of waste, known things that do not match any congressional appropriation can take up to a year to get on the list and even once on the list, the list is not used. It's mind blowing. So -- so what we're talking about here, we're really just talking about adding common sense controls that should be present, that that haven't been present. So you say like, well, how could such a thing arise? That's that seems that seems crazy that when you understand that really everything is geared towards complaint minimization, so that -- then you understand the motivations. So, if people receive money, they don't complain, obviously, but if people don't receive money, they do complain and -- and the fraudsters complain the loudest and the fastest. So, then when you understand that, then it makes sense. Oh that's why everything just they approve all the payments at Treasury b/c if you approve all the payments, you don't -- you don't get complaints. But now now we're saying no, no, actually, we're all going to complain if money is spent badly, if -- if your taxpayer dollars are not spent in a sensible and frugal manner, then that's not okay. Your -- your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on the things that matter to the people. I mean, these things like it's just common sense. It's not. It's it's not draconian or radical. I think it's really just saying, let's look at each each of these expenditures and say, is this actually in the best interest of the people? And if it is, it's approved. If it's not, we should think about it."

.gorklon rust on what Department of Government Efficiency has found so far: "We do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there are quite a few -- people in, in the bureaucracy who, who have ostensibly a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while they are in that position, which is, you know, what happened at USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing, in which case we should take their investment advice perhaps, but just -- there seems to be mysteriously, they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where does it come from? And I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at taxpayer expense. That's -- that's the -- that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we're looking at, say, well, we would just -- if you look at, say, say Treasury, for example, basic controls that should be in place that are in place in any company, such as making sure that any given payment has a payment categorization code, that there is a comment field that describes the payment and if the payment is on the do not pay list, that you don't actually pay it. None of those things are true currently, so the reason that departments can't pass audits is because the payments don't have a categorization code. It's like just a massive number of blank checks just flying out the building. So you can't reconcile blank checks. You've got a comment fields that are also blank, so you don't know why the payment was made and then we've got this truly absurd a do not pay list, which can take up to a year for an organization to get on a do no pay list and we're talking about terrorist organizations. We're talking about, known fraudsters, known aspects of waste, known things that do not match any congressional appropriation can take up to a year to get on the list and even once on the list, the list is not used. It's mind blowing. So -- so what we're talking about here, we're really just talking about adding common sense controls that should be present, that that haven't been present. So you say like, well, how could such a thing arise? That's that seems that seems crazy that when you understand that really everything is geared towards complaint minimization, so that -- then you understand the motivations. So, if people receive money, they don't complain, obviously, but if people don't receive money, they do complain and -- and the fraudsters complain the loudest and the fastest. So, then when you understand that, then it makes sense. Oh that's why everything just they approve all the payments at Treasury b/c if you approve all the payments, you don't -- you don't get complaints. But now now we're saying no, no, actually, we're all going to complain if money is spent badly, if -- if your taxpayer dollars are not spent in a sensible and frugal manner, then that's not okay. Your -- your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on the things that matter to the people. I mean, these things like it's just common sense. It's not. It's it's not draconian or radical. I think it's really just saying, let's look at each each of these expenditures and say, is this actually in the best interest of the people? And if it is, it's approved. If it's not, we should think about it."

Curtis Houck

14,545 просмотров • 1 год назад

😼🔮💵📈 $GME “Now it's all about the transformation and that cash pile is growing, it seems to be growing, will they raise more money? We'll see, I don't know - I see it. But...if people, if you just change one factor and that's that you don't think Ryan Cohen is a doofus, alright? If you don't think he's a doofus and he's not a fool, if you don't think that - and all of a sudden, suddenly they're sitting on billions of dollars in cash, and you actually think not only is he not a doofus but - he's extremely talented in that he has the capability to turn this around, even if you don't agree with that, even if you don't believe it, that's fine, if you just pause for a moment and think about that - I think it really changes your mindset so that becomes the bet - that becomes the bet.”

😼🔮💵📈 $GME “Now it's all about the transformation and that cash pile is growing, it seems to be growing, will they raise more money? We'll see, I don't know - I see it. But...if people, if you just change one factor and that's that you don't think Ryan Cohen is a doofus, alright? If you don't think he's a doofus and he's not a fool, if you don't think that - and all of a sudden, suddenly they're sitting on billions of dollars in cash, and you actually think not only is he not a doofus but - he's extremely talented in that he has the capability to turn this around, even if you don't agree with that, even if you don't believe it, that's fine, if you just pause for a moment and think about that - I think it really changes your mindset so that becomes the bet - that becomes the bet.”

Swami

32,025 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump pushes back on Florida removing all vaccine mandates, including for schoolchildren. He says some vaccines are a must. "I think we have to be careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The Polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that COVID [vax] is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that." "But you have some vaccines that are so incredible. And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very tough position." "Initially, I heard about it yesterday. And it's a tough stance. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple, they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, people should take it."

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump pushes back on Florida removing all vaccine mandates, including for schoolchildren. He says some vaccines are a must. "I think we have to be careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The Polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that COVID [vax] is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that." "But you have some vaccines that are so incredible. And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very tough position." "Initially, I heard about it yesterday. And it's a tough stance. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple, they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, people should take it."

Eric Daugherty

5,410,929 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🗣️: Do you believe teammates in F1 teams should be able to just fight openly for championships or do you think inevitably there has to be some control from the pit wall? Carlos: I think it depends on the domination of the team. I think the Mercedes years was a perfect example of them being so dominating that they could afford to fight each other a bit more. I think whenever their championship can go away to a different team, a different driver, you need to respect that and be a bit more careful. I think even if the teams don't say that, the drivers' championship is something that a team wants. 🗣️: Especially when the other driver is Max Verstappen. Carlos: It doesn't matter who the other driver is. If the other driver is called Pepe or Pepito, it doesn't matter. If that championship can go for the team and the driver, and you have two drivers fighting for it, and there's one guy that can take it, it doesn't matter if it's Carlos Sainz, Max Verstappen or Charles Leclerc. You want the championship for your two drivers, so you want to keep them relatively under control.

🗣️: Do you believe teammates in F1 teams should be able to just fight openly for championships or do you think inevitably there has to be some control from the pit wall? Carlos: I think it depends on the domination of the team. I think the Mercedes years was a perfect example of them being so dominating that they could afford to fight each other a bit more. I think whenever their championship can go away to a different team, a different driver, you need to respect that and be a bit more careful. I think even if the teams don't say that, the drivers' championship is something that a team wants. 🗣️: Especially when the other driver is Max Verstappen. Carlos: It doesn't matter who the other driver is. If the other driver is called Pepe or Pepito, it doesn't matter. If that championship can go for the team and the driver, and you have two drivers fighting for it, and there's one guy that can take it, it doesn't matter if it's Carlos Sainz, Max Verstappen or Charles Leclerc. You want the championship for your two drivers, so you want to keep them relatively under control.

yoyo 🦄

212,893 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

This is key... Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "I think most people don't know what my stance is on vaccines. I've never been anti-vaccine. And I've said that hundreds and hundreds of times, but it doesn't matter, because that is a way of silencing me. Using that pejorative to describe me is a way of silencing or marginalizing me. My position on vaccines, I think, is... I think virtually every American would agree with my stance on vaccines, which is that vaccines should be tested like other medicines." "They should be safety tested. And unfortunately, vaccines are not safety tested. They're not. There's, of the 72 vaccine doses now mandated, essentially mandated, they're recommended, but they're really mandated, are American children. None of them, not one, has ever been subject to a pre-licensing placebo-controlled trial." "Dr. Fauci and many other people for many years said this at Bobby Kennedy when he says that is wrong. So I met with Dr. Fauci in 2016. I agreed to go on Trump's Vaccine Safety Commission. And I was with Aaron Siri and Lynn Redwood and a number of other people. And we said to him, can you show us one test from any vaccine, pre-licensing safety test? And he said, I'll send it to you. I can't find one now. He never did." "So we sued him. We sued, Aaron Siri and I sued HHS. And after a year of litigation and stonewalling, they said that they could not provide a single safety study for any vaccine that is on the childhood schedule, pre-licensing safety study. Anybody who wants to read that can go to my web, to the Children's Health Defense website and you can read HHS's admission that not a single one has ever been safety tested pre-licensing." "Now, what I've said is other medicines are required to do that. And we should have to do that for vaccines. If I'm wrong, show me the test, show me the study. You won't be able to, because there are none. That means that we don't know what the... long-term risks are, the risk profile of those products. And I'll give you, you and me, you mentioned chickenpox." "When CDC was thinking of recommending this chickenpox vaccine as mandating for children, they did a study and the scientist they hired to do that study was a scientist called Gary Goldman, a contract scientist. And he did the study in an isolated place in California called Antelope Valley, a long-term study." "And what they find is if you give the chickenpox vaccine, mass vaccinate with chickenpox, it stops chickenpox, but it causes shingles epidemics later on, which are 20 times as deadly as chickenpox. So nevertheless, despite those studies, we mandated for American children in this country. In Europe, they don't." "If you go to the British National Health Service website right now, you can read on that where they say, we do not recommend chickenpox vaccines because it causes shingles epidemics later on. And that's the problem." "You can't just look at, you know, you can say that this product is gonna prevent this particular disease, but you have to look at the long-term impacts, you know, vaccines like other medicines have injuries that have long term, long diagnostic horizons and long incubation periods that if you do not do long term studies on a placebo control studies, comparing vaccinated populations to unvaccinated populations."

Camus

322,499 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."

Camus

69,827 просмотров • 1 год назад