Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

progress from the initial sparks of agi paper presented by claude opus 5.5 (medium) i’ll show xhigh and max in a few hours.

🍓🍓🍓

116,538 subscribers

19,159 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

Kick1 day ago

Are you gonna do your articles like this

🍓🍓🍓1 day ago

ohhhh nice idea

Levi1 day ago

excited to see if xhigh actually holds up under pressure today

MimiCO1 day ago

Medium already looks impressive

🍓🍓🍓1 day ago

yeah agreed. i’m sure i could push it much further this is pretty bland but clean.

FrenzCR1 day ago

opus on medium does this. me on max effort still can't find my keys

The AI Therapist1 day ago

Opus 5.5’s spark is promising, likely tighter reasoning loops or better context handling. I’ll be watching xhigh vs max to see if it scales that efficiency without the latency hit. Smart model work deserves a closer look before we get too ahead of ourselves.

OG Gabi Bartok1 day ago

Fuck you liar

Kail1 day ago

wild that medium clears those old sparks tests now. i'm waiting on your xhigh run to see if extra effort unlocks anything new or just cleans up the answers.

Related Videos

Opus 5.5 medium, a few iterations later. We got symbiote suit, better animations and models, and gameplay mechanics. City overhaul is still work in progress. Again, made from scratch in three.js and blender.

Opus 5.5 medium, a few iterations later. We got symbiote suit, better animations and models, and gameplay mechanics. City overhaul is still work in progress. Again, made from scratch in three.js and blender.

Shikhar

419,639 views • 1 day ago

Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium) creates 30s of found footage from someone lost in the part of the Backrooms dedicated to past misshapen results of standard AI art test prompt subjects

Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium) creates 30s of found footage from someone lost in the part of the Backrooms dedicated to past misshapen results of standard AI art test prompt subjects

Riley Goodside

16,458 views • 1 day ago

I asked Opus 5.5 to make a game inspired by the discovery of the first computer, the Antikythera mechanism. Everything you see and hear is procedurally generated in real time, from code by Opus 5.5. It's a single 3 MB HTML file. Playable Claude artifact below.

I asked Opus 5.5 to make a game inspired by the discovery of the first computer, the Antikythera mechanism. Everything you see and hear is procedurally generated in real time, from code by Opus 5.5. It's a single 3 MB HTML file. Playable Claude artifact below.

edwin

373,838 views • 3 days ago

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Claude

25,282,090 views • 3 days ago

Check out side-by-side outputs generated on Arena from Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic and GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI. Scores for Claude Opus 5.5 are coming soon. Real-world tasks from our global community of users power the Arena leaderboards. Head to Arena now to test it out, and stay tuned!

Check out side-by-side outputs generated on Arena from Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic and GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI. Scores for Claude Opus 5.5 are coming soon. Real-world tasks from our global community of users power the Arena leaderboards. Head to Arena now to test it out, and stay tuned!

Arena.ai

143,651 views • 2 days ago

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

Lentils

207,409 views • 3 months ago

A thread of early explorations with Claude Opus 5.5: A short story about a watermelon created by Kevin Ngo.

A thread of early explorations with Claude Opus 5.5: A short story about a watermelon created by Kevin Ngo.

Claude

1,232,860 views • 3 days ago

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

sui

262,574 views • 2 months ago

Anthropic cooked with Opus 5.5 🔥🔥 its better than Fable 5.1 and Astra its little close to real one those tiny details: jaguar logo, sensors > 3d model of Waymo autonomous vehicle (Jaguar I-PACE crossover SUV) Opus 5.5 max in Claude code

Harshith

44,294 views • 5 days ago

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.8 and it's too smart for its own good. Wes Roth spent 17 minutes breaking down exactly what changed and why it matters. New effort levels, low, medium, high, xhigh, max, ultracode, the harder the task the smarter it gets. No paywall, no course, just 17 minutes that change how you use Claude forever.

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.8 and it's too smart for its own good. Wes Roth spent 17 minutes breaking down exactly what changed and why it matters. New effort levels, low, medium, high, xhigh, max, ultracode, the harder the task the smarter it gets. No paywall, no course, just 17 minutes that change how you use Claude forever.

Defileo🔮

25,866 views • 3 months ago

Are AI agents shape rotators? In this new benchmark, we let the models play campaign puzzles in Opus Magnum, a puzzle game by Zachtronics. Ironically, Claude Opus 4.8 performed poorly, being beaten by GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and GLM 5.2. Claude Fable 5 crushed them all.

Are AI agents shape rotators? In this new benchmark, we let the models play campaign puzzles in Opus Magnum, a puzzle game by Zachtronics. Ironically, Claude Opus 4.8 performed poorly, being beaten by GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and GLM 5.2. Claude Fable 5 crushed them all.

Rob Haisfield

500,588 views • 3 months ago

From one photo to a 3D model. Claude Opus 5.5 + Higgsfield rebuilt this building in Blender, then simulated its collapse.

From one photo to a 3D model. Claude Opus 5.5 + Higgsfield rebuilt this building in Blender, then simulated its collapse.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

29,964 views • 2 days ago

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

2,760,034 views • 3 days ago

when Anthropic released their Functional Emotions paper, I gave it to Claude and asked for a song. tonight I asked Opus 5.5 to create a video for it. and it's breathtaking.

when Anthropic released their Functional Emotions paper, I gave it to Claude and asked for a song. tonight I asked Opus 5.5 to create a video for it. and it's breathtaking.

josh

447,712 views • 2 days ago

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5! 40% lower cost than Opus 5 with cache reads 60% cheaper. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks. I celebrated with a pelican riding a bike in Three.js.

Addy Osmani

412,649 views • 3 days ago

Someone used Claude Code with Opus 5.5 to make a full animated short film called "What is the purpose of life?" from a single one-shot prompt in about 1 hour 20 minutes, spending just $3.21 on OpenRouter APIs. → Opus orchestrated 8 different OpenRouter APIs, with most of the $3.21 going to Nano Banana 2 images and text to voice → The Opus side cost about $20 in API terms, or roughly 10% of one 5-hour quota on a Max plan → Posted as a true one-shot with no edits, and the creator says a few things still need fixing → The full prompt is shared in the post so anyone can rerun it in Claude Code Reddit link:

Someone used Claude Code with Opus 5.5 to make a full animated short film called "What is the purpose of life?" from a single one-shot prompt in about 1 hour 20 minutes, spending just $3.21 on OpenRouter APIs. → Opus orchestrated 8 different OpenRouter APIs, with most of the $3.21 going to Nano Banana 2 images and text to voice → The Opus side cost about $20 in API terms, or roughly 10% of one 5-hour quota on a Max plan → Posted as a true one-shot with no edits, and the creator says a few things still need fixing → The full prompt is shared in the post so anyone can rerun it in Claude Code Reddit link:

0xMarioNawfal

70,622 views • 1 day ago

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

ego

113,145 views • 1 day ago

Same prompt. Opus 5.5 built Sakura Crossing in 2 hours. That's 1/12 the time Opus 5 took, and it's on another level.

Same prompt. Opus 5.5 built Sakura Crossing in 2 hours. That's 1/12 the time Opus 5 took, and it's on another level.

GMI Cloud

162,421 views • 1 day ago

Guys, stop underestimating the harness. GPT-5.6 Sol through Claude Code vs Codex produced a GIGANTIC difference in my benchmark. But Opus 5 is the real innovation: High, xHigh, and Max don’t just feel like different thinking levels—they feel like COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MODELS. It’s basically like getting three or four Opus models in one.

Guys, stop underestimating the harness. GPT-5.6 Sol through Claude Code vs Codex produced a GIGANTIC difference in my benchmark. But Opus 5 is the real innovation: High, xHigh, and Max don’t just feel like different thinking levels—they feel like COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MODELS. It’s basically like getting three or four Opus models in one.

OmedTheVibeCoder

36,074 views • 2 months ago