Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

PROMİSE DAVİD

13,423 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Making sure everything is firm
0:22

Sensitive content

Making sure everything is firm

Viktor

10,819 views • 9 days ago

Bow to The Most Dominant Master 👑
0:59

Sensitive content

Bow to The Most Dominant Master 👑

Middle Eastern 👑 Emperor

32,961 views • 13 days ago

oomf just said futa means trans people
0:22

Sensitive content

oomf just said futa means trans people

jeff the killer

23,861 views • 2 days ago

King Rondo - Size 14 - HTX #feet #thugfeetkings
0:24

Sensitive content

King Rondo - Size 14 - HTX #feet #thugfeetkings

ThugFeetKings

40,148 views • 1 year ago

THIS IS THE NEXT BIG UK SCANDAL The Hidden Credit Line scandal has run since the 2000s. NatWest (NatWest Group), Royal Bank of Scotland (Royal Bank) and Ulster Bank (Ulster Bank) sold business owners loans with an interest rate swap attached. It was marketed as protection if rates rose. It actually created hidden exposure against the customer's own assets that nobody clearly explained. When rates fell after 2008, banks used that exposure to call in debts, strip assets and push profitable businesses into insolvency. Steve Middleton (stephen middleton) and Mark Wright, a former RBS manager, built BankConfidential (BankConfidential) to collect the evidence. Mark Wright put in about £60,000 of his own pension. Neither made a penny and both lost their careers for telling the truth. In November 2022 they met the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) with Lord Prem Sikka (Prem Sikka) and derivatives expert Ian Tyler. James Hurley (James Hurley) of The Times and Sunday Times had already written 4 articles calling it financial and accounting fraud. The FCA let NatWest review itself and concluded it was not technically criminal fraud. BankConfidential published its full report in November 2025. On 14 April 2026 it prompted a Westminster Hall debate led by John McDonnell (John McDonnell), chair of the APPG on Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services (Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services). MPs asked for a judge led statutory inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005. Six reviews had already produced no justice. Ian Byrne (lan Byrne MP) said this scandal belongs alongside Hillsborough, Post Office Horizon and infected blood. He also noted the FCA is a private company limited by guarantee with immunity from civil liability. Andrew Candy was hit with an undisclosed £70,000 break cost. He lost his business and family home and spent 17 years seeking answers. Economic Secretary Lucy Rigby (Lucy Rigby KC MP) replied that the FCA is independent and ministers should be careful about interfering. The regulator failed for over a decade, and its independence is now the reason given for not investigating that failure. Nobody has gone to prison... yet. Sources: stephen middleton, BankConfidential, James Hurley, The Times and Sunday Times, Hansard Westminster Hall debate 14 April 2026, John McDonnell, lan Byrne MP, Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services, Transparency Task Force, Financial Conduct Authority, Lucy Rigby KC MP, Money Marketing

Artur Nadolny

20,162 views • 5 days ago

🔥THE TRUTH, for those with balls and brains enough to face it—Fauci is not the main criminal behind Covid. That's a "fairytale" The REAL PERPETRATOR in the U.S. is the National Security Council, which created the Covid policies! Don't let gasbag Bland Paul gaslight you! Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") explains: "[Fauci being the main driver behind Covid is] a fairy tale for adults, really. I mean, it's an absolutely naive, infantile view of things" "Yeah, he's in charge of a bunch of science money to be distributed. So how does he have jurisdiction over 50 states to dictate masking policies, for example?" "Everybody's saying, 'Oh! Fauci pushed for masks!' Well, push ahead for anything you want. But how do you have jurisdiction over 50 states to enact almost identical policies for masking? How do you have jurisdiction not only over 50 states, but 100-and-what-85 countries of the world? To enact identical policies?" "On what legal basis does [this] megalomaniac run the world? ... how does he coordinate all of that in the entire country and the entire world?" "And, we know. We know what kind of power. We've demonstrated it. It's the National Security Council—it's the military. It's the bioterrorism doctrines, the pandemic emergency doctrines, the completely unconstitutional set of laws that have been put on the books over 20 years in preparation for this event by all countries together"

Sense Receptor

20,379 views • 3 months ago