Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Proof that Candace and her followers routinely present nonsense as settled fact and get it wrong. They manufacture suspicion by labeling ordinary procedures “weird” when the only real problem is their own ignorance. Candace claimed a body must be cooled to 40 degrees before an autopsy can be performed.... Baron repeated the same claim and called the speed of the autopsy “suspicious.” That is false. It is optimal to perform an autopsy as soon as possible. Cooling is used for storage or longer transport (generally beyond roughly 24 hours). There is no requirement that the body reach 40 degrees before the examination begins. Bodies are refrigerated (typically in the 34 to 40 degree range) only if there will be a delay; the autopsy itself proceeds without waiting for full core cooling. This entire “investigation” consists of roughly 90 percent fraud and incompetence, which is why after eleven months she has not produced a single piece of court admissible evidence. If she and the rest were not making millions defrauding their audience, the whole performance would be comical.show more

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

42,137 subscribers

16,142 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

‼️👀No Autopsy: Audio claiming that there was no autopsy done on Charlie Kirk. Stating that the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital. Utah Law says: “In Utah, when a person is murdered (a death by violence), the law mandates that an autopsy must be done if the medical examiner deems it necessary or the prosecutor requests it. To refuse or omit one in a homicide case is illegal under Utah Code § 26-4-6. If true, there is a massive coverup going on. Here is the problem. The case against the shooter is already lost. There is no credible evidence to substantiate a conviction. If No Autopsy Is Done Procedural Violation: Failing to perform an autopsy in such a case could itself be a violation of law, potentially subjecting officials to administrative or even legal challenges. Prosecution Problems: Without an autopsy, the cause and manner of death are not medically certified. Evidence like bullet trajectory, wound analysis, toxicology, and time of death may be missing. This weakens or even cripples the ability to prove homicide beyond a reasonable doubt. In Utah, not doing an autopsy in a murder case is both legally improper and practically devastating to prosecution. If one wasn’t done in the Charlie Kirk assassination, it’s an enormous red flag H/t: HustleBitch

‼️👀No Autopsy: Audio claiming that there was no autopsy done on Charlie Kirk. Stating that the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital. Utah Law says: “In Utah, when a person is murdered (a death by violence), the law mandates that an autopsy must be done if the medical examiner deems it necessary or the prosecutor requests it. To refuse or omit one in a homicide case is illegal under Utah Code § 26-4-6. If true, there is a massive coverup going on. Here is the problem. The case against the shooter is already lost. There is no credible evidence to substantiate a conviction. If No Autopsy Is Done Procedural Violation: Failing to perform an autopsy in such a case could itself be a violation of law, potentially subjecting officials to administrative or even legal challenges. Prosecution Problems: Without an autopsy, the cause and manner of death are not medically certified. Evidence like bullet trajectory, wound analysis, toxicology, and time of death may be missing. This weakens or even cripples the ability to prove homicide beyond a reasonable doubt. In Utah, not doing an autopsy in a murder case is both legally improper and practically devastating to prosecution. If one wasn’t done in the Charlie Kirk assassination, it’s an enormous red flag H/t: HustleBitch

Joshua Reid | Redpills.tv

182,704 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨Baron Coleman Breaking: Under Utah law, Charlie Kirk was not required to undergo an autopsy. Moreover, recorded police scanner audio reveals that an officer explicitly stated that he did not receive one. Scanner transcript: “He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital.” Utah Code Title 26B, Chapter 8 makes that possible! • The medical examiner shall assume jurisdiction over deaths by violence or gunshot. • An autopsy shall be performed only “if, in the opinion of the medical examiner, an autopsy should be performed or if an autopsy is requested by the district attorney or county attorney having criminal jurisdiction, or by the attorney general” Here's where it gets really interesting! 👀 Charlie’s motorcade departed from Timpanogos Regional Hospital around 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025, to transport his deceased body to the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner in Taylorsville. The search warrant affidavit states that an autopsy was conducted on the body the same day, with Sgt. Barrett present. A standard forensic autopsy (external examination, internal examination, organ weighing, documentation, and sample collection) is a multi-hour process. Starting well after 8:00 p.m. and still producing a completed, certifiable result on the same calendar day creates an incredibly tight window to achieve that. Furthermore, during cross-examination at the preliminary hearing, Investigator Sgt. David Hull, who presented the summary, confirmed that he was not present at the examination and only had knowledge of its contents from a meeting with the medical examiner and the written report. So where is the medical examiner that allegedly performed this autopsy?! In March 2026, Guajardo relocated from Utah to Dutchess County, New York, where he was appointed as the Medical Examiner. As a result of his relocation, he is no longer affiliated with the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner and is geographically and jurisdictionally removed from the case. What about Sgt. Barrett, the officer who allegedly could be a witness? In any publicly available court filing or official disclosure, no full first name, badge number, or other identifying information for this Sgt. Barrett has been released. The prosecution’s entire account of the postmortem examination rests on two named individuals who have never testified under oath about it. One has left the state and taken a new position in New York; the other remains unidentified beyond a last name in a single affidavit. The only testimony introduced at the preliminary hearing on this point was hearsay from an investigator who was not present. This leaves no firsthand, testifying witness available to describe, under cross-examination, what actually occurred after the body left the hospital near 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025... Was Charlie Kirk cremated after no autopsy was performed?! How could they not perform an autopsy on Charlie?! This SCREAMS coverup. Make sure to watch Baron’s entire episode from last night! There’s a lot of information that’s not covered here that you won’t want to miss!

🚨Baron Coleman Breaking: Under Utah law, Charlie Kirk was not required to undergo an autopsy. Moreover, recorded police scanner audio reveals that an officer explicitly stated that he did not receive one. Scanner transcript: “He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital.” Utah Code Title 26B, Chapter 8 makes that possible! • The medical examiner shall assume jurisdiction over deaths by violence or gunshot. • An autopsy shall be performed only “if, in the opinion of the medical examiner, an autopsy should be performed or if an autopsy is requested by the district attorney or county attorney having criminal jurisdiction, or by the attorney general” Here's where it gets really interesting! 👀 Charlie’s motorcade departed from Timpanogos Regional Hospital around 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025, to transport his deceased body to the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner in Taylorsville. The search warrant affidavit states that an autopsy was conducted on the body the same day, with Sgt. Barrett present. A standard forensic autopsy (external examination, internal examination, organ weighing, documentation, and sample collection) is a multi-hour process. Starting well after 8:00 p.m. and still producing a completed, certifiable result on the same calendar day creates an incredibly tight window to achieve that. Furthermore, during cross-examination at the preliminary hearing, Investigator Sgt. David Hull, who presented the summary, confirmed that he was not present at the examination and only had knowledge of its contents from a meeting with the medical examiner and the written report. So where is the medical examiner that allegedly performed this autopsy?! In March 2026, Guajardo relocated from Utah to Dutchess County, New York, where he was appointed as the Medical Examiner. As a result of his relocation, he is no longer affiliated with the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner and is geographically and jurisdictionally removed from the case. What about Sgt. Barrett, the officer who allegedly could be a witness? In any publicly available court filing or official disclosure, no full first name, badge number, or other identifying information for this Sgt. Barrett has been released. The prosecution’s entire account of the postmortem examination rests on two named individuals who have never testified under oath about it. One has left the state and taken a new position in New York; the other remains unidentified beyond a last name in a single affidavit. The only testimony introduced at the preliminary hearing on this point was hearsay from an investigator who was not present. This leaves no firsthand, testifying witness available to describe, under cross-examination, what actually occurred after the body left the hospital near 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025... Was Charlie Kirk cremated after no autopsy was performed?! How could they not perform an autopsy on Charlie?! This SCREAMS coverup. Make sure to watch Baron’s entire episode from last night! There’s a lot of information that’s not covered here that you won’t want to miss!

Travis

170,569 просмотров • 11 дней назад

🔥🚨DEVELOPING: Obamas Chef is now reported to have suffered blunt trauma prior to death. There are also reports stating that the Obamas called of the autopsy being performed by the local authorities and flew their own mortician from D.C. to perform the autopsy. If the rumors are true and Tafari Campbell was indeed publishing a book, is it time to ask what were the things he has seen?

🔥🚨DEVELOPING: Obamas Chef is now reported to have suffered blunt trauma prior to death. There are also reports stating that the Obamas called of the autopsy being performed by the local authorities and flew their own mortician from D.C. to perform the autopsy. If the rumors are true and Tafari Campbell was indeed publishing a book, is it time to ask what were the things he has seen?

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

4,234,895 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨BIZARRE: The Autopsy Lie —First No Autopsy, Now a “Fake” Autopsy Report? 🧐Two Conflicting Stories About Charlie Kirk’s Death That Both REEK of a COVER-UP! This is insane. First we were told there was NO AUTOPSY —that Erica Kirk simply signed the death certificate and Charlie’s body was rushed out. Now new reports claim an autopsy WAS performed and even list shocking details of a 30-06 rifle wound. Two completely opposite stories. Two completely opposite timelines. And the FBI + media? Dead silent. 📝 If there really was no autopsy, that’s illegal under Utah law for a violent homicide. 📝 If there was an autopsy, the “official” report doesn’t match the surgeon’s statement about where the bullet traveled or the lack of an exit wound. None of it adds up. Why is the high-quality footage from that night hidden? Why won’t they release the full autopsy or the ballistics report? These are the only two things we need to solve the case — and they’re the only two things we’re NOT getting. Watch this video by Nathan Cornacchia and Alex Jones and see the evidence yourself. The inconsistencies are insane. This is either the sloppiest investigation ever or a full-on cover-up. I'll drop the FULL VIDEO in the COMMENTS Below, I highly suggest you all go watch it as there is a lot more i had to cut out for time. Also make sure to FOLLOW him on X and Youtube and go give his video a LIKE. 👀 Watch. Share. Save. ⚠️ Don’t let this story disappear.

🚨BIZARRE: The Autopsy Lie —First No Autopsy, Now a “Fake” Autopsy Report? 🧐Two Conflicting Stories About Charlie Kirk’s Death That Both REEK of a COVER-UP! This is insane. First we were told there was NO AUTOPSY —that Erica Kirk simply signed the death certificate and Charlie’s body was rushed out. Now new reports claim an autopsy WAS performed and even list shocking details of a 30-06 rifle wound. Two completely opposite stories. Two completely opposite timelines. And the FBI + media? Dead silent. 📝 If there really was no autopsy, that’s illegal under Utah law for a violent homicide. 📝 If there was an autopsy, the “official” report doesn’t match the surgeon’s statement about where the bullet traveled or the lack of an exit wound. None of it adds up. Why is the high-quality footage from that night hidden? Why won’t they release the full autopsy or the ballistics report? These are the only two things we need to solve the case — and they’re the only two things we’re NOT getting. Watch this video by Nathan Cornacchia and Alex Jones and see the evidence yourself. The inconsistencies are insane. This is either the sloppiest investigation ever or a full-on cover-up. I'll drop the FULL VIDEO in the COMMENTS Below, I highly suggest you all go watch it as there is a lot more i had to cut out for time. Also make sure to FOLLOW him on X and Youtube and go give his video a LIKE. 👀 Watch. Share. Save. ⚠️ Don’t let this story disappear.

Project Constitution

23,783 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

In estimates I asked the Department of Health what processes it uses to monitor the performance of the TGA. I asked this because an early autopsy recommended that Sarcoid patients get an echocardiogram before getting the vaccine. This was based on an examination that showed the vaccine killed this particular patient. As you know the TGA don’t even solicit autopsy reports, which is bad enough in terms of recognising deaths, but it’s even worse when you consider that the coroners may be giving advice that is being overlooked by the TGA. This is clearly what happened with the COVID jab that has caused tens of thousands of heart issues. Had the TGA actually read the autopsy reports these injuries may have been avoided. There is no doubt the TGA is negligent in causing injury and death. The same should be said of the Health Minister Greg Hunt who was also warned of these injuries by myself and did nothing about it. #auspol

In estimates I asked the Department of Health what processes it uses to monitor the performance of the TGA. I asked this because an early autopsy recommended that Sarcoid patients get an echocardiogram before getting the vaccine. This was based on an examination that showed the vaccine killed this particular patient. As you know the TGA don’t even solicit autopsy reports, which is bad enough in terms of recognising deaths, but it’s even worse when you consider that the coroners may be giving advice that is being overlooked by the TGA. This is clearly what happened with the COVID jab that has caused tens of thousands of heart issues. Had the TGA actually read the autopsy reports these injuries may have been avoided. There is no doubt the TGA is negligent in causing injury and death. The same should be said of the Health Minister Greg Hunt who was also warned of these injuries by myself and did nothing about it. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

23,676 просмотров • 1 год назад

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.

The SCIF

830,355 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

Redpill Drifter

104,419 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Moksha in Advaita Vedanta: Not a Destination, but a Recognition In Advaita Vedanta, Moksha is not described as a place to reach, a world to escape to, or a future reward after death. Moksha is knowledge — the clear seeing of what has always been true. It is the end of ignorance, not the acquisition of something new. According to Advaita, the fundamental mistake of human life is adhyāsa — the superimposition of the non-Self upon the Self. We take ourselves to be the body, the mind, the roles, the doer, the sufferer. From this misunderstanding arises fear, desire, attachment, and the sense of bondage. Moksha is the dissolution of this misunderstanding. Moksha Is Not “Going Somewhere” Advaita Vedanta firmly rejects the idea that liberation is a journey to another realm. The Self (Ātman) is already free, eternal, and complete. If liberation were something to be attained, it would be impermanent. But the Upanishads declare: “You are That” (Tat Tvam Asi) This means that Brahman, the absolute reality, is not separate from you. Therefore, Moksha cannot be an event in time or a change in location. It is the recognition that bondage itself was never real. Bondage Was Never Real The statement “the bondage that seemed real never actually existed” is central to Advaita. The world of suffering is compared to mistaking a rope for a snake in dim light. The fear feels real, the reaction is real, but the snake was never there. Similarly, ignorance (avidyā) creates the illusion of limitation. When the right knowledge (jñāna) arises, nothing physically changes. The body remains, the world continues, actions happen — but the false identification collapses. The individual no longer takes the body or mind to be the Self. The Body Is Not Abandoned, the World Is Not Escaped Advaita does not teach rejection of the world through physical renunciation alone. Liberation does not require the body to be destroyed or society to be abandoned. What falls away is the belief that “I am this body” or “I am bound by this world.” The liberated one (jīvanmukta) lives fully in the world while knowing it as mithyā — not unreal, but dependent, temporary, and not absolute. The world continues to appear, but it no longer binds. Moksha as the End of Forgetfulness Moksha is often described as smṛti — remembrance. It is remembering one’s true nature as pure awareness (chaitanya), untouched by birth and death. Nothing new is gained; rather, something false is lost. This is why Advaita says: You do not become free You discover that you were never bound Fear ends because there is no second thing. Desire ends because completeness is recognized. Suffering ends because the sufferer is seen as an idea, not a fact. Knowledge Alone Liberates In Advaita Vedanta, liberation is not produced by rituals, actions, or even meditation alone. These may purify the mind, but Moksha arises only through knowledge of the Self. This knowledge is not intellectual belief but direct insight into one’s own being. When ignorance ends, Moksha is immediate. There is no waiting, no afterlife requirement, no qualification of time. Conclusion Moksha, in Advaita Vedanta, is not escape — it is clarity. Not renunciation of the world — but renunciation of false identity. Not the destruction of life — but the destruction of ignorance. Nothing leaves. Nothing arrives. Only the truth is seen as it has always been. And in that seeing, freedom stands revealed.

Moksha in Advaita Vedanta: Not a Destination, but a Recognition In Advaita Vedanta, Moksha is not described as a place to reach, a world to escape to, or a future reward after death. Moksha is knowledge — the clear seeing of what has always been true. It is the end of ignorance, not the acquisition of something new. According to Advaita, the fundamental mistake of human life is adhyāsa — the superimposition of the non-Self upon the Self. We take ourselves to be the body, the mind, the roles, the doer, the sufferer. From this misunderstanding arises fear, desire, attachment, and the sense of bondage. Moksha is the dissolution of this misunderstanding. Moksha Is Not “Going Somewhere” Advaita Vedanta firmly rejects the idea that liberation is a journey to another realm. The Self (Ātman) is already free, eternal, and complete. If liberation were something to be attained, it would be impermanent. But the Upanishads declare: “You are That” (Tat Tvam Asi) This means that Brahman, the absolute reality, is not separate from you. Therefore, Moksha cannot be an event in time or a change in location. It is the recognition that bondage itself was never real. Bondage Was Never Real The statement “the bondage that seemed real never actually existed” is central to Advaita. The world of suffering is compared to mistaking a rope for a snake in dim light. The fear feels real, the reaction is real, but the snake was never there. Similarly, ignorance (avidyā) creates the illusion of limitation. When the right knowledge (jñāna) arises, nothing physically changes. The body remains, the world continues, actions happen — but the false identification collapses. The individual no longer takes the body or mind to be the Self. The Body Is Not Abandoned, the World Is Not Escaped Advaita does not teach rejection of the world through physical renunciation alone. Liberation does not require the body to be destroyed or society to be abandoned. What falls away is the belief that “I am this body” or “I am bound by this world.” The liberated one (jīvanmukta) lives fully in the world while knowing it as mithyā — not unreal, but dependent, temporary, and not absolute. The world continues to appear, but it no longer binds. Moksha as the End of Forgetfulness Moksha is often described as smṛti — remembrance. It is remembering one’s true nature as pure awareness (chaitanya), untouched by birth and death. Nothing new is gained; rather, something false is lost. This is why Advaita says: You do not become free You discover that you were never bound Fear ends because there is no second thing. Desire ends because completeness is recognized. Suffering ends because the sufferer is seen as an idea, not a fact. Knowledge Alone Liberates In Advaita Vedanta, liberation is not produced by rituals, actions, or even meditation alone. These may purify the mind, but Moksha arises only through knowledge of the Self. This knowledge is not intellectual belief but direct insight into one’s own being. When ignorance ends, Moksha is immediate. There is no waiting, no afterlife requirement, no qualification of time. Conclusion Moksha, in Advaita Vedanta, is not escape — it is clarity. Not renunciation of the world — but renunciation of false identity. Not the destruction of life — but the destruction of ignorance. Nothing leaves. Nothing arrives. Only the truth is seen as it has always been. And in that seeing, freedom stands revealed.

श्री

14,074 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Indian Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar says, "The first outcome of the visit is that there is full understanding of the threat that terrorism emanating from Pakistan poses to the larger international community, not only India. Second, there is a complete understanding that this threat needs to be tackled... It has been stated by Russian officials yesterday that the fight has to be joined, and there is unflinching support for the fight against terrorism. There is also an understanding that it cannot be business as usual and that there is a need to take a tough stand. While we all want this problem to be resolved through political and diplomatic means, India has the right to defend itself if Pakistan does not stop using terrorism as a state policy."

Indian Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar says, "The first outcome of the visit is that there is full understanding of the threat that terrorism emanating from Pakistan poses to the larger international community, not only India. Second, there is a complete understanding that this threat needs to be tackled... It has been stated by Russian officials yesterday that the fight has to be joined, and there is unflinching support for the fight against terrorism. There is also an understanding that it cannot be business as usual and that there is a need to take a tough stand. While we all want this problem to be resolved through political and diplomatic means, India has the right to defend itself if Pakistan does not stop using terrorism as a state policy."

Aditya Raj Kaul

118,780 просмотров • 1 год назад

This couple is getting ready to have a baby, the woman plans on having her husband as well as her own mother present because the hospital only allows two people in the delivery room. The only problem is that the father’s mom insists that she be allowed to be present ok and feels her daughter in law is being selfish by choosing her own mother over the mother in law to be present. I feel that this is their moment and their baby. They should be respected for their decision and it’s not like they are denying the mother in law the chance to see the new baby when the baby is born. I feel the wife wanted her support team there and that’s perfectly fine. But what do you think of the dad’s mo, is it fair to her that she’s being denied entry to the delivery room?

This couple is getting ready to have a baby, the woman plans on having her husband as well as her own mother present because the hospital only allows two people in the delivery room. The only problem is that the father’s mom insists that she be allowed to be present ok and feels her daughter in law is being selfish by choosing her own mother over the mother in law to be present. I feel that this is their moment and their baby. They should be respected for their decision and it’s not like they are denying the mother in law the chance to see the new baby when the baby is born. I feel the wife wanted her support team there and that’s perfectly fine. But what do you think of the dad’s mo, is it fair to her that she’s being denied entry to the delivery room?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

391,354 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

VIDEO | Varanasi: Shankaracharya Avimukteshwarananda reacts to the Prayagraj court order, saying, “Yes, it is appropriate. Only when a case is registered will the subsequent process of investigation and recording of testimony be completed. Only then will the truth of the false case filed against us come before everyone, and those responsible for doing this can be punished. Therefore, it is necessary. We would only say that the court should proceed with this at a faster pace without taking too much time, as many people are watching this matter. Testimony should be recorded and a decision taken as soon as possible. What is wrong will remain wrong, and the false case that has been filed will ultimately be proven false.” A special POCSO court in Prayagraj directs the police to register an FIR against Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati and his disciple Swami Mukundanand Giri in connection with allegations of sexual exploitation. (Full video available on

VIDEO | Varanasi: Shankaracharya Avimukteshwarananda reacts to the Prayagraj court order, saying, “Yes, it is appropriate. Only when a case is registered will the subsequent process of investigation and recording of testimony be completed. Only then will the truth of the false case filed against us come before everyone, and those responsible for doing this can be punished. Therefore, it is necessary. We would only say that the court should proceed with this at a faster pace without taking too much time, as many people are watching this matter. Testimony should be recorded and a decision taken as soon as possible. What is wrong will remain wrong, and the false case that has been filed will ultimately be proven false.” A special POCSO court in Prayagraj directs the police to register an FIR against Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati and his disciple Swami Mukundanand Giri in connection with allegations of sexual exploitation. (Full video available on

Press Trust of India

16,166 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Candace Owens is an idiot, and she's given away the entire game. Candace says investigators don’t share what they’ve discovered with the “victim,” and she presents that as something suspicious. As if evidence should be handed out during an active investigation. As if prosecutors are supposed to brief private organizations, families, or podcast hosts on sealed material. That single sentence does all the work. Charlie was the victim. The case belongs to the State of Utah. Not TPUSA. Not Erica Kirk. Not Candace Owens. The state controls the evidence, the timeline, and the disclosures, precisely so prosecutions don’t collapse into mistrials and circus acts. That isn’t secrecy. That’s how the system has always functioned. This doesn’t reveal a cover-up, it reveals her own ignorance. She's confused legal process for narrative drama, and mistaken procedure as malice. When you hear shock at the most basic rules of prosecution, you’re not witnessing investigative courage, you’re watching someone discover, in real time, that they never understood the machinery they claimed to be exposing. She's a moron, and she just told everyone.

Candace Owens is an idiot, and she's given away the entire game. Candace says investigators don’t share what they’ve discovered with the “victim,” and she presents that as something suspicious. As if evidence should be handed out during an active investigation. As if prosecutors are supposed to brief private organizations, families, or podcast hosts on sealed material. That single sentence does all the work. Charlie was the victim. The case belongs to the State of Utah. Not TPUSA. Not Erica Kirk. Not Candace Owens. The state controls the evidence, the timeline, and the disclosures, precisely so prosecutions don’t collapse into mistrials and circus acts. That isn’t secrecy. That’s how the system has always functioned. This doesn’t reveal a cover-up, it reveals her own ignorance. She's confused legal process for narrative drama, and mistaken procedure as malice. When you hear shock at the most basic rules of prosecution, you’re not witnessing investigative courage, you’re watching someone discover, in real time, that they never understood the machinery they claimed to be exposing. She's a moron, and she just told everyone.

Walter Curt

68,917 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

CNN just spent an entire segment proving the DNC autopsy is every bit as bad and evasive as we expected. "There are a lot of things in that version that are incomplete, uh, and also it does not touch a couple topics that a lot of people were very interested in and thought were the reasons for this report not being out." "There is nothing about Joe Biden and what happened in the debate. There is nothing about Kamala Harris getting the nomination without any kind of primary process."

CNN just spent an entire segment proving the DNC autopsy is every bit as bad and evasive as we expected. "There are a lot of things in that version that are incomplete, uh, and also it does not touch a couple topics that a lot of people were very interested in and thought were the reasons for this report not being out." "There is nothing about Joe Biden and what happened in the debate. There is nothing about Kamala Harris getting the nomination without any kind of primary process."

Andrew Kolvet

118,071 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

NEW: Matt Walsh says if any of Candace Owens' claims were used as evidence in a court of law, she would be laughed out of the room. Walsh said Owens' attacks on Erika Kirk are not only factually wrong, but also morally wrong. "The whole crux of the matter here is not just that Erika is a grieving widow, but that she is innocent of the accusations that are being made or implied against her."

NEW: Matt Walsh says if any of Candace Owens' claims were used as evidence in a court of law, she would be laughed out of the room. Walsh said Owens' attacks on Erika Kirk are not only factually wrong, but also morally wrong. "The whole crux of the matter here is not just that Erika is a grieving widow, but that she is innocent of the accusations that are being made or implied against her."

Collin Rugg

463,393 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Not for a moment will I ever say that we must not give premium to innocence. Democracy is nurtured, its core values blossom, and human rights are taken at a high pedestal when we believe in innocence till the guilt is established. Therefore, I must not be misunderstood as casting aspersions on any individual. But then, in a democratic nation, purity of its criminal justice system defines its direction. Investigation is required. No investigation under law is in progress at the moment. Because for a criminal investigation, the initiation has to be by an FIR—First Information Report. It is not there. It is the law of the land that every cognizable offence is required to be reported to the police. And failure to do so—failure to report a cognizable offence—is a crime. Therefore, you all will be wondering why there has been no FIR. The answer is simple. An FIR in this country can be registered against anyone—any constitutional functionary, including the one before you. One has only to activate the rule of law. No permission is required. But if it is judges—FIR cannot be straightaway registered. It has to be approved by the concerned in judiciary. But that is not given in the Constitution. The Constitution of India has accorded immunity from prosecution only to the Hon'ble President and the Hon'ble Governors. So how come a category beyond law has secured this immunity? Because the ill-effects of this are being felt in the mind of one and all. Every Indian, young and old, is deeply concerned. If the event had taken place at his house, the speed would have been an electronic rocket. Now, it is not even a cattle cart. #RajyaSabha

Not for a moment will I ever say that we must not give premium to innocence. Democracy is nurtured, its core values blossom, and human rights are taken at a high pedestal when we believe in innocence till the guilt is established. Therefore, I must not be misunderstood as casting aspersions on any individual. But then, in a democratic nation, purity of its criminal justice system defines its direction. Investigation is required. No investigation under law is in progress at the moment. Because for a criminal investigation, the initiation has to be by an FIR—First Information Report. It is not there. It is the law of the land that every cognizable offence is required to be reported to the police. And failure to do so—failure to report a cognizable offence—is a crime. Therefore, you all will be wondering why there has been no FIR. The answer is simple. An FIR in this country can be registered against anyone—any constitutional functionary, including the one before you. One has only to activate the rule of law. No permission is required. But if it is judges—FIR cannot be straightaway registered. It has to be approved by the concerned in judiciary. But that is not given in the Constitution. The Constitution of India has accorded immunity from prosecution only to the Hon'ble President and the Hon'ble Governors. So how come a category beyond law has secured this immunity? Because the ill-effects of this are being felt in the mind of one and all. Every Indian, young and old, is deeply concerned. If the event had taken place at his house, the speed would have been an electronic rocket. Now, it is not even a cattle cart. #RajyaSabha

Vice-President of India

95,655 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens’ SMOKING GUN that she thinks will get Erika Kirk “DRAGGED into a POLICE PRECINCT”? Allegedly, Erika Kirk’s friend had a “bad feeling” about the UVU event. According to a tip Candace says she received, that friend told her daughter - who worked as an assistant for the Kirks - decided not to go to work that day. And for this, Candace believes Erika Kirk and her friend should be dragged in by the police and made to wait while the daughter is questioned. Because in Candy Land, a “bad feeling” equals hard evidence. Not to mention, none of this may even be true (and if it is… seriously, who cares?). It’s actually BEYOND EMBARRASSING that after FIVE MONTHS, this is the best Candace can come up with.

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens’ SMOKING GUN that she thinks will get Erika Kirk “DRAGGED into a POLICE PRECINCT”? Allegedly, Erika Kirk’s friend had a “bad feeling” about the UVU event. According to a tip Candace says she received, that friend told her daughter - who worked as an assistant for the Kirks - decided not to go to work that day. And for this, Candace believes Erika Kirk and her friend should be dragged in by the police and made to wait while the daughter is questioned. Because in Candy Land, a “bad feeling” equals hard evidence. Not to mention, none of this may even be true (and if it is… seriously, who cares?). It’s actually BEYOND EMBARRASSING that after FIVE MONTHS, this is the best Candace can come up with.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

59,058 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

696,435 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | Atul Subhash suicide case | Delhi: Bar Council of India Chairman and BJP's Rajya Sabha MP Manan Kumar Mishra says, "... The incident is unfortunate. The behaviour of the judge is also unfortunate and there should be action... The High Court will not remain quiet regarding this... As far as 498A is considered, everyone knows that it is being more misused than it is being used properly. The no. of genuine cases has decreased... The whole family gets trapped... The provisions of the law need some changes. There should be a preliminary inquiry before lodging the FIR. There should be an inquiry before the complaint is launched. If there seems to be a case prima facie, then the FIR should be lodged... It should be made bailable... Women file a case of 498A even at petty issues... So many issues can be solved by mediation and don't need to be taken to the Court if proper changes are made in the law..."

#WATCH | Atul Subhash suicide case | Delhi: Bar Council of India Chairman and BJP's Rajya Sabha MP Manan Kumar Mishra says, "... The incident is unfortunate. The behaviour of the judge is also unfortunate and there should be action... The High Court will not remain quiet regarding this... As far as 498A is considered, everyone knows that it is being more misused than it is being used properly. The no. of genuine cases has decreased... The whole family gets trapped... The provisions of the law need some changes. There should be a preliminary inquiry before lodging the FIR. There should be an inquiry before the complaint is launched. If there seems to be a case prima facie, then the FIR should be lodged... It should be made bailable... Women file a case of 498A even at petty issues... So many issues can be solved by mediation and don't need to be taken to the Court if proper changes are made in the law..."

ANI

103,799 просмотров • 1 год назад

Mabel Chinomona is not merely an embarrassment to leadership. She is a case study in how power decays when it falls into hands that mistake noise for authority. Every time she speaks, she performs her own autopsy, exposing the incompetence, greed, and ideological bankruptcy at the heart of the Emmerson Mnangagwa system she defends. This is not leadership. It is malpractice. In a nation staggering under hunger, poverty, and hopelessness, she stands on public platforms boasting about being a “thug.” That single word is her confession, a self indictment delivered with pride. While citizens scrape for survival, she celebrates the very behaviour that has brought Zimbabwe to its knees. It is a grotesque display of detachment, a declaration that the suffering of the people means nothing to those insulated by privilege and protected by impunity. She drapes herself in the title of “war veteran” as if it were armour, yet her conduct desecrates the very legacy she claims. True liberation fighters fought for dignity, justice, and the future of the ordinary person. She fights only for relevance. True veterans carried the weight of a nation. She carries only her own self interest. Her behaviour has reduced a noble history to a hollow slogan, a shield used not to defend the nation but to escape accountability. Here is the surgical truth, when the people look at her, they do not see courage, wisdom, or leadership. They see the final symptom of a system that no longer even pretends to care. They see a voice that echoes the regime’s arrogance, a mouth that opens only to remind the nation how far its leaders have fallen. History does not forget such betrayals. Her legacy is writing itself, and it is damning, loud, and irreversible. Kunyangara fesi zvese nemoyo. #mabelchinomona #dutyeremadutye #diabolical

Mabel Chinomona is not merely an embarrassment to leadership. She is a case study in how power decays when it falls into hands that mistake noise for authority. Every time she speaks, she performs her own autopsy, exposing the incompetence, greed, and ideological bankruptcy at the heart of the Emmerson Mnangagwa system she defends. This is not leadership. It is malpractice. In a nation staggering under hunger, poverty, and hopelessness, she stands on public platforms boasting about being a “thug.” That single word is her confession, a self indictment delivered with pride. While citizens scrape for survival, she celebrates the very behaviour that has brought Zimbabwe to its knees. It is a grotesque display of detachment, a declaration that the suffering of the people means nothing to those insulated by privilege and protected by impunity. She drapes herself in the title of “war veteran” as if it were armour, yet her conduct desecrates the very legacy she claims. True liberation fighters fought for dignity, justice, and the future of the ordinary person. She fights only for relevance. True veterans carried the weight of a nation. She carries only her own self interest. Her behaviour has reduced a noble history to a hollow slogan, a shield used not to defend the nation but to escape accountability. Here is the surgical truth, when the people look at her, they do not see courage, wisdom, or leadership. They see the final symptom of a system that no longer even pretends to care. They see a voice that echoes the regime’s arrogance, a mouth that opens only to remind the nation how far its leaders have fallen. History does not forget such betrayals. Her legacy is writing itself, and it is damning, loud, and irreversible. Kunyangara fesi zvese nemoyo. #mabelchinomona #dutyeremadutye #diabolical

kerina mujati

36,328 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Candace has some issues coming with the Harpole case. Here is Nicholas Brooks, who is a lawyer breaks it all down. I’ve watched many of his videos for the Macron case. He isn’t bias. And this case Candace should be very worried about. Believe me she’s not excited about discovery and will try to get it dismissed as she did the Macron case. The first video is what the lawsuit is about. Harpole is suing Candace for defamation due to her saying he conspired with the US government, the assassinate Charlie Kirk. The second video explains the allegations and how the laws in Tennessee work regarding the allegations. The third which is really good lays out how Candace knowingly stated Harpole could be at the meeting even though she was in possession of the flight logs showing he couldn’t be there. She lied to her audience. And fourth and the best one is what happens next. Candace will file to dismiss. How will she explain that one to her fans? And this video shows why dismissal won’t be successful and that discovery is the last thing she wants. Every text and email of hers will have to be put in discovery regarding this. And how her company operates to get information. The entire video is here and I urge you to watch it. He goes into full detail why this case is not a case that Owens can win.

Candace has some issues coming with the Harpole case. Here is Nicholas Brooks, who is a lawyer breaks it all down. I’ve watched many of his videos for the Macron case. He isn’t bias. And this case Candace should be very worried about. Believe me she’s not excited about discovery and will try to get it dismissed as she did the Macron case. The first video is what the lawsuit is about. Harpole is suing Candace for defamation due to her saying he conspired with the US government, the assassinate Charlie Kirk. The second video explains the allegations and how the laws in Tennessee work regarding the allegations. The third which is really good lays out how Candace knowingly stated Harpole could be at the meeting even though she was in possession of the flight logs showing he couldn’t be there. She lied to her audience. And fourth and the best one is what happens next. Candace will file to dismiss. How will she explain that one to her fans? And this video shows why dismissal won’t be successful and that discovery is the last thing she wants. Every text and email of hers will have to be put in discovery regarding this. And how her company operates to get information. The entire video is here and I urge you to watch it. He goes into full detail why this case is not a case that Owens can win.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

48,459 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад