正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Pro-open-border rioters blocked Loomer Unleashed Charles R Downs after we questioned Rep. Pramila Jayapal at the anti-ICE rally she just spoke at in DC. We asked her why Congressional Democrats support violent, pro-illegal alien rioters. Rep Jayapal was leaving a pro-open borders riot protest on the sidewalk near the...

109,320 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

My husband and I decided to open our hearts to a 10-and-a-half-year-old dog. We weren't looking to adopt another dog, but when we learned that she had spent three months at the shelter without a single visitor or adoption inquiry, we couldn't bear the thought of her growing old and passing away alone. Although she wasn't with a rescue organization, her story was shared widely throughout the animal rescue community. She was incredibly gentle and sweet, and the shelter volunteers adored her. They loved her so much that they often let her spend time with them in the office instead of leaving her alone in her kennel. The day after we heard about her, we went to meet her. The moment we saw her, we knew we couldn't walk away. When we brought her home, she was covered in ticks. Helping her recover wasn't easy. We made countless trips to the veterinarian, patiently tried different treatments, and devoted a great deal of time to her care. There were moments when it felt overwhelming, but we never regretted our decision. All we wanted was for her to spend the rest of her life surrounded by love. In the end, we received the greatest gift of all. She stayed with us for three more wonderful years before peacefully passing away at 13 and a half years old, an impressive age for a dog. She brought so much joy into our family and will always hold a special place in our hearts. Senior dogs may not have as much time left, but they deserve love, care, and a real home just as much as any other dog. 🐾❤️ 📹treatsnatcher

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

22,349 次观看 • 1 个月前

🔥MUST SEE! 🔥🔥 STING!🔥 Chapter 1. The Bust. The chamber fell into a stunned hush as Attorney General Pam Bondi reached into her black binder and withdrew a single sheet of paper. The label was unmistakable: "Jayapal Pramila Search History. "It was February 11, 2026, during a tense House Judiciary Committee hearing on the Department of Justice's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Earlier that week, the DOJ under the new administration had finally granted members of Congress limited in-person access to unredacted versions of the long-sought Epstein documents. Lawmakers could review them on secure DOJ computers, in private sessions, using their own logins. The promise was confidentiality, each member could explore the files without interference, armed only with their oversight authority and a burning need for answers. But the document Bondi now held told a different story. Printed neatly were timestamps, file numbers, and brief descriptions each entry corresponding to searches performed by Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) during her recent visit to the department. The list matched what Jayapal herself later confirmed she had queried. The DOJ, it turned out, had been logging every access who logged in, when, and exactly which documents they opened or searched. What was sold as a secure, member-only review had included invisible surveillance. The room erupted. Democrats leaped to their feet, voices overlapping in fury. "This is spying!" one shouted. "Blatant abuse of power!" another cried. Jayapal, her face flushed, accused Bondi of bringing a "burn book" to the hearing using the tracked data not for security, but to prepare partisan counterattacks and dodge real questions about the Epstein case. She called it a violation of separation of powers, an intimidation tactic aimed at lawmakers performing constitutional oversight. Bondi remained composed, but the revelation spread like wildfire across the Capitol. Other members who had quietly reviewed the files began to wonder: Had their own searches been cataloged too? Whispers turned to demands bipartisan in places for the DOJ to stop the tracking immediately, destroy the logs, and explain why such monitoring had been put in place without notice. The irony hung heavy in the air. Here were officials, entrusted with probing one of the most explosive scandals in modern memory a web of powerful figures potentially implicated in Epstein's crimes now furious at being watched themselves. Accusations flew: How could they condemn the surveillance without admitting curiosity about certain files? Some had reportedly searched terms or documents that, if exposed, might raise uncomfortable questions. Yet to fight the logging risked shining a spotlight on their own inquiries. The hearing adjourned amid chaos, but the fallout was only beginning. Democrats launched investigations, letters flew demanding full accounting, and even House Speaker Mike Johnson publicly chided the practice as inappropriate. Jayapal and allies vowed to pursue every avenue to end what they called "outrageous secret surveillance."In the shadows of the Epstein saga, a new layer of distrust had been laid bare not just between the public and the powerful, but among the powerful themselves. It was brilliant. Stay tuned. EPSTEIN FILES

Whiplash347

11,335 次观看 • 6 个月前