Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Propaganda can shape perceptions—but it cannot rewrite history. For years, a relentless political campaign has sought to portray the Gandhi family as the embodiment of corruption and anti-nationalism. Repetition of allegations, however, is not the same as proof. In this clip, Priyanka Gandhi does not respond with personal attacks....

ashokdadhwal196's profile picture

Ashok Dadhwal

5,000 subscribers

53,509 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.
14:02

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.

Ashok Dadhwal

14,868 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Congress MP Imran Masood's statement, Chairperson, Delhi State Haj Committee Kausar Jahan says, "Whether it is Rahul Gandhi or Priyanka Gandhi, they are not even capable of winning a couple of seats in the states, let alone becoming Prime Minister... The country has chosen a strong leader in Narendra Modi as Prime Minister, and there is no vacancy for this position for many years to come. Imran Masood's statements certainly reveal that all is not well between the Congress party and the Gandhi family. Separate power centres have emerged within the family and the party, and Rahul and Priyanka, the brother and sister, are pursuing different agendas. The Congress party is in a coma and desperately needs serious political treatment."
0:50

#WATCH | Delhi: On Congress MP Imran Masood's statement, Chairperson, Delhi State Haj Committee Kausar Jahan says, "Whether it is Rahul Gandhi or Priyanka Gandhi, they are not even capable of winning a couple of seats in the states, let alone becoming Prime Minister... The country has chosen a strong leader in Narendra Modi as Prime Minister, and there is no vacancy for this position for many years to come. Imran Masood's statements certainly reveal that all is not well between the Congress party and the Gandhi family. Separate power centres have emerged within the family and the party, and Rahul and Priyanka, the brother and sister, are pursuing different agendas. The Congress party is in a coma and desperately needs serious political treatment."

ANI

102,943 views • 9 months ago

In the last press conference, it was asked what to do when the democratic structure is not working. What we are doing is making it absolutely clear to the people of India what has happened. We are informing the people that the Prime Minister and the Home Minister are not legitimately in government. Similarly, the CM of Haryana is not legitimately in government because it has been stolen. It's the same with the government of Maharashtra. India's Gen Z and the youth have the power to restore democracy with Satya and Ahimsa—by expressing their desire for a democratic India, by fighting for a democratic India and by resisting this wholesale theft and murder of the Constitution and democracy. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍Delhi
1:14

In the last press conference, it was asked what to do when the democratic structure is not working. What we are doing is making it absolutely clear to the people of India what has happened. We are informing the people that the Prime Minister and the Home Minister are not legitimately in government. Similarly, the CM of Haryana is not legitimately in government because it has been stolen. It's the same with the government of Maharashtra. India's Gen Z and the youth have the power to restore democracy with Satya and Ahimsa—by expressing their desire for a democratic India, by fighting for a democratic India and by resisting this wholesale theft and murder of the Constitution and democracy. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍Delhi

Congress

10,913 views • 10 months ago

It is inevitable that such a monumental figure (Pt. Nehru) will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times, the challenges he had to face, and to look at him devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean, and defame him. The sole objective of this is not only to diminish him as a personality and undermine his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his leadership in the early decades of an independent nation grappling with unprecedented problems, but also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote, and what he did is quite another — and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India
4:27

It is inevitable that such a monumental figure (Pt. Nehru) will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times, the challenges he had to face, and to look at him devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean, and defame him. The sole objective of this is not only to diminish him as a personality and undermine his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his leadership in the early decades of an independent nation grappling with unprecedented problems, but also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote, and what he did is quite another — and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

Congress

11,248 views • 9 months ago

The Obidient Movement remains an organic movement driven by the self-sacrifice, commitment, and collective determination of Nigerians who believe that a New Nigeria is Possible. We align strongly with the ideas and principles of His Excellency, Mr. Peter Obi, who has consistently demonstrated a different approach to politics by challenging the dominance of a money-driven political system. While resources are important in politics, the excessive influence of money has caused significant harm to Nigeria's democratic development and the well-being of its people. As believers in democratic values, we are concerned about the deregistration of political parties such as ADC, AA, ZLP and APP. A vibrant democracy thrives on inclusiveness, political participation, and the availability of diverse platforms through which citizens can freely express their aspirations and choices. The future of Nigeria's democracy must be built on fairness, inclusion, credible institutions, and the active participation of citizens. The Obidient Movement will continue to advocate for good governance, accountability, and a democratic culture that empowers the people rather than wealth and political influence. — Dr. Yunusa Tanko National Coordinator, Obidient Movement
0:47

The Obidient Movement remains an organic movement driven by the self-sacrifice, commitment, and collective determination of Nigerians who believe that a New Nigeria is Possible. We align strongly with the ideas and principles of His Excellency, Mr. Peter Obi, who has consistently demonstrated a different approach to politics by challenging the dominance of a money-driven political system. While resources are important in politics, the excessive influence of money has caused significant harm to Nigeria's democratic development and the well-being of its people. As believers in democratic values, we are concerned about the deregistration of political parties such as ADC, AA, ZLP and APP. A vibrant democracy thrives on inclusiveness, political participation, and the availability of diverse platforms through which citizens can freely express their aspirations and choices. The future of Nigeria's democracy must be built on fairness, inclusion, credible institutions, and the active participation of citizens. The Obidient Movement will continue to advocate for good governance, accountability, and a democratic culture that empowers the people rather than wealth and political influence. — Dr. Yunusa Tanko National Coordinator, Obidient Movement

Dr Yunusa Tanko

15,946 views • 3 months ago

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India
9:38

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

Congress

45,430 views • 9 months ago

Did Gandhi and Nehru really divide India? Or were the real culprits someone else? For today’s political narratives, Gandhi and Nehru are often blamed for the creation of Pakistan. But the truth of history is very different. The Two-Nation Theory was first put forward by Savarkar and the Hindu Mahasabha. Jinnah and the Muslim League strongly demanded a separate nation. Mountbatten’s haste finally led to the Partition. In this video, IIT Professor Dr. Ram Puniyani Dr Ram Puniyani exposes how fake history spread through WhatsApp blames Gandhi and Nehru, while the real responsibility lies elsewhere. This reel is only a glimpse. The full discussion is available on my channel Sohit Mishra Official. Link :
2:29

Did Gandhi and Nehru really divide India? Or were the real culprits someone else? For today’s political narratives, Gandhi and Nehru are often blamed for the creation of Pakistan. But the truth of history is very different. The Two-Nation Theory was first put forward by Savarkar and the Hindu Mahasabha. Jinnah and the Muslim League strongly demanded a separate nation. Mountbatten’s haste finally led to the Partition. In this video, IIT Professor Dr. Ram Puniyani Dr Ram Puniyani exposes how fake history spread through WhatsApp blames Gandhi and Nehru, while the real responsibility lies elsewhere. This reel is only a glimpse. The full discussion is available on my channel Sohit Mishra Official. Link :

sohit mishra

78,306 views • 11 months ago

The strengthening of democracy is not rooted in rigid doctrines but in the rhythms of everyday actions, behaviours, and practices of individual societies. Differences in opinions and approaches are inevitable; that is the beauty of democracy. It evolves with the needs of a people. Differences of political opinion or party aside, a common purpose unites us all - the aspiration to build a free, democratic, egalitarian, and humane Bangladesh. In the wake of the student-led and public uprising that toppled the previous autocratic regime, a rare and transformative opportunity has emerged to realise that common purpose. However, this opportunity is fragile. It must not be undermined by the schemes of exiled autocrats and their allies or by unnecessary divisions within the democratic forces dedicated to the nation’s progress. Vigilance and unity are imperative to safeguard this moment of potential. We need to continue putting the country's needs ahead of any personal or political gain. Establishing democratic norms won't be an easy path but I have full faith in the people of Bangladesh and their will to realise that norm.
1:21

The strengthening of democracy is not rooted in rigid doctrines but in the rhythms of everyday actions, behaviours, and practices of individual societies. Differences in opinions and approaches are inevitable; that is the beauty of democracy. It evolves with the needs of a people. Differences of political opinion or party aside, a common purpose unites us all - the aspiration to build a free, democratic, egalitarian, and humane Bangladesh. In the wake of the student-led and public uprising that toppled the previous autocratic regime, a rare and transformative opportunity has emerged to realise that common purpose. However, this opportunity is fragile. It must not be undermined by the schemes of exiled autocrats and their allies or by unnecessary divisions within the democratic forces dedicated to the nation’s progress. Vigilance and unity are imperative to safeguard this moment of potential. We need to continue putting the country's needs ahead of any personal or political gain. Establishing democratic norms won't be an easy path but I have full faith in the people of Bangladesh and their will to realise that norm.

Tarique Rahman

36,740 views • 1 year ago

What sacrifice has any leader of the BJP-RSS ever done for the nation? They did not even participate in the National Movement. For elections, Modi ji is lying to the people that their Mangalsutra shall not be safe. Congress governed this country for 55 years. Has that even happened once? Smt. Indira Gandhi donated her jewellery in the 1962 War. Pandit Motilal Nehru and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru donated their home for Freedom Movement as Anand Bhawan in Allahabad. Our leaders have lived and sacrificed their life-blood for the nation.
1:47

What sacrifice has any leader of the BJP-RSS ever done for the nation? They did not even participate in the National Movement. For elections, Modi ji is lying to the people that their Mangalsutra shall not be safe. Congress governed this country for 55 years. Has that even happened once? Smt. Indira Gandhi donated her jewellery in the 1962 War. Pandit Motilal Nehru and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru donated their home for Freedom Movement as Anand Bhawan in Allahabad. Our leaders have lived and sacrificed their life-blood for the nation.

Mallikarjun Kharge

90,700 views • 2 years ago

🔥 “After Nehru, Rahul Gandhi Is the First Who Took the RSS Head-On” Former Rajya Sabha MP Mohammad Adeeb makes a striking political argument: Rahul Gandhi, he says, is the first major leader in the Nehru-Gandhi family after Jawaharlal Nehru to confront the RSS directly and without hesitation. Adeeb contrasts Rahul’s approach with Indira Gandhi, whom he says was more politically flexible towards the RSS. His larger point is about ideological inheritance: Rahul Gandhi, in his view, has demonstrated that he represents the constitutional, secular and pluralist vision associated with Nehru—and that this explains why the RSS and its supporters continue to attack Nehru. Adeeb also makes a powerful historical argument about India’s plural inheritance. If Mughal history is removed from textbooks, he asks rhetorically, should we also remove the monuments and cultural legacy associated with that period—the Red Fort, Jama Masjid and the Taj Mahal? His underlying message is simple: You cannot selectively erase history without impoverishing the history of India itself. He then moves to accountability. Whether someone is a politician, activist or thinker, Adeeb argues, they should ask where the enormous amounts of public money being spent are going—and insist that those responsible eventually provide an account. He further claims that many communal conflicts historically had an economic dimension, arguing that Muslim-owned crafts and businesses were displaced in the aftermath of communal violence. That is a serious historical claim and should be examined through evidence rather than treated as an established fact merely because it is asserted in an interview. Adeeb has a long record of speaking on secularism, minority rights and the RSS. In earlier interviews, he has criticised the Congress for what he called its diluted secularism while also arguing that the party historically did not make Muslims feel that they did not belong to India. The larger question India's history cannot be reduced to the history of one religion, one dynasty or one ideology. A civilisation becomes stronger when it remembers everything—not when it remembers selectively. And democratic politics requires something even more important: Power must be questioned, public money must be accounted for, and historical claims must survive scrutiny rather than propaganda. 🎥 Video credit: News MX 📌 Source: "Threads post / original video" #RahulGandhi #Nehru #RSS #Secularism #IndianHistory #Democracy #Constitution #MohammadAdeeb #DimagiNaxal
2:06

🔥 “After Nehru, Rahul Gandhi Is the First Who Took the RSS Head-On” Former Rajya Sabha MP Mohammad Adeeb makes a striking political argument: Rahul Gandhi, he says, is the first major leader in the Nehru-Gandhi family after Jawaharlal Nehru to confront the RSS directly and without hesitation. Adeeb contrasts Rahul’s approach with Indira Gandhi, whom he says was more politically flexible towards the RSS. His larger point is about ideological inheritance: Rahul Gandhi, in his view, has demonstrated that he represents the constitutional, secular and pluralist vision associated with Nehru—and that this explains why the RSS and its supporters continue to attack Nehru. Adeeb also makes a powerful historical argument about India’s plural inheritance. If Mughal history is removed from textbooks, he asks rhetorically, should we also remove the monuments and cultural legacy associated with that period—the Red Fort, Jama Masjid and the Taj Mahal? His underlying message is simple: You cannot selectively erase history without impoverishing the history of India itself. He then moves to accountability. Whether someone is a politician, activist or thinker, Adeeb argues, they should ask where the enormous amounts of public money being spent are going—and insist that those responsible eventually provide an account. He further claims that many communal conflicts historically had an economic dimension, arguing that Muslim-owned crafts and businesses were displaced in the aftermath of communal violence. That is a serious historical claim and should be examined through evidence rather than treated as an established fact merely because it is asserted in an interview. Adeeb has a long record of speaking on secularism, minority rights and the RSS. In earlier interviews, he has criticised the Congress for what he called its diluted secularism while also arguing that the party historically did not make Muslims feel that they did not belong to India. The larger question India's history cannot be reduced to the history of one religion, one dynasty or one ideology. A civilisation becomes stronger when it remembers everything—not when it remembers selectively. And democratic politics requires something even more important: Power must be questioned, public money must be accounted for, and historical claims must survive scrutiny rather than propaganda. 🎥 Video credit: News MX 📌 Source: "Threads post / original video" #RahulGandhi #Nehru #RSS #Secularism #IndianHistory #Democracy #Constitution #MohammadAdeeb #DimagiNaxal

Ashok Dadhwal

30,221 views • 1 month ago

"We remember the blessings of God and the gift of freedom. We need also to remember the responsibility that comes as a result. A nation is not held together by prosperity alone, but by truth, virtue, and the character of its people." . The real story of America has always been about God. As America marks 250 years, this is a moment to remember, not just celebrate. It is a time to thank God for His blessings, reflect on the spiritual foundations of our nation, and return to His Word as the authority for our lives and our future. The hope of a nation is not found in prosperity alone, but in truth, virtue, prayer, and the character of its people. . Celebrating 250 Years #4thOfJuly #America250 #IndependenceDay
1:00

"We remember the blessings of God and the gift of freedom. We need also to remember the responsibility that comes as a result. A nation is not held together by prosperity alone, but by truth, virtue, and the character of its people." . The real story of America has always been about God. As America marks 250 years, this is a moment to remember, not just celebrate. It is a time to thank God for His blessings, reflect on the spiritual foundations of our nation, and return to His Word as the authority for our lives and our future. The hope of a nation is not found in prosperity alone, but in truth, virtue, prayer, and the character of its people. . Celebrating 250 Years #4thOfJuly #America250 #IndependenceDay

David Jeremiah

10,597 views • 2 months ago

Amitabh Bachchan was one of the closest friends of Rajiv Gandhi and the Nehru–Gandhi family. He entered politics in 1984 as a Congress MP from Allahabad at Rajiv Gandhi's request, stood by the family after Rajiv's assassination, and publicly expressed deep admiration for the Nehru–Gandhi family. However, after Congress lost power and the BJP rose to dominance in 2014, Amitabh gradually became closely associated with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP establishment. Critics argue that this reflects a shift in loyalty with changing political power.
1:27

Amitabh Bachchan was one of the closest friends of Rajiv Gandhi and the Nehru–Gandhi family. He entered politics in 1984 as a Congress MP from Allahabad at Rajiv Gandhi's request, stood by the family after Rajiv's assassination, and publicly expressed deep admiration for the Nehru–Gandhi family. However, after Congress lost power and the BJP rose to dominance in 2014, Amitabh gradually became closely associated with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP establishment. Critics argue that this reflects a shift in loyalty with changing political power.

Amock

23,831 views • 2 months ago

What a foolish response. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela was a giant of the liberation struggle. Thabo Mbeki was a key figure in the ANC in exile, working closely with O.R. Tambo. Max Sisulu and Lindiwe Sisulu were activists in their own right, with their own political records and contributions. Trying to compare that with Jacob Zuma appointing his son Duduzane as Deputy President of the MK Party is absurd. The MK Party is not being run like a democratic political movement; it is being run like a family business, and that is what it is. The party has become a vehicle for Jacob Zuma to pursue personal vendettas, protect his financial interests and fight his perceived enemies. His son has no comparable political credentials and is linked to the Gupta network where he was a director. The Guptas are synonymous with the looting of South Africa’s public resources during the state capture era. To equate Duduzane’s appointment with the achievements and sacrifices of people like Winnie Madikizela-Mandela and Thabo Mbeki is not just historically inaccurate and an insult; it is intellectually dishonest. It is an insult to South Africa’s liberation history. What Jacob Zuma is doing is exactly the kind of behaviour that those who oppose democracy point to when they argue that democracy does not work in Africa. They use examples like this to claim that elections simply replace one form of patronage with another. There is a reason why this looks so familiar. In Equatorial Guinea, President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo appointed his son, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue who is widely known as Teodorín, as Vice President while he remained President. It became a textbook example of dynastic politics masquerading as democracy. That is what the MK Party is increasingly beginning to resemble. Political parties are supposed to serve the people, not families. Leadership positions should be earned through merit, experience and democratic processes, not inherited through bloodlines. MK supporters are free to defend this decision if they wish, but trying to justify blatant nepotism only weakens their argument. You cannot claim to be fighting for democracy while applauding the concentration of power within one family. That is not democratic renewal. It is dynastic politics dressed up as a political movement.
1:00

What a foolish response. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela was a giant of the liberation struggle. Thabo Mbeki was a key figure in the ANC in exile, working closely with O.R. Tambo. Max Sisulu and Lindiwe Sisulu were activists in their own right, with their own political records and contributions. Trying to compare that with Jacob Zuma appointing his son Duduzane as Deputy President of the MK Party is absurd. The MK Party is not being run like a democratic political movement; it is being run like a family business, and that is what it is. The party has become a vehicle for Jacob Zuma to pursue personal vendettas, protect his financial interests and fight his perceived enemies. His son has no comparable political credentials and is linked to the Gupta network where he was a director. The Guptas are synonymous with the looting of South Africa’s public resources during the state capture era. To equate Duduzane’s appointment with the achievements and sacrifices of people like Winnie Madikizela-Mandela and Thabo Mbeki is not just historically inaccurate and an insult; it is intellectually dishonest. It is an insult to South Africa’s liberation history. What Jacob Zuma is doing is exactly the kind of behaviour that those who oppose democracy point to when they argue that democracy does not work in Africa. They use examples like this to claim that elections simply replace one form of patronage with another. There is a reason why this looks so familiar. In Equatorial Guinea, President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo appointed his son, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue who is widely known as Teodorín, as Vice President while he remained President. It became a textbook example of dynastic politics masquerading as democracy. That is what the MK Party is increasingly beginning to resemble. Political parties are supposed to serve the people, not families. Leadership positions should be earned through merit, experience and democratic processes, not inherited through bloodlines. MK supporters are free to defend this decision if they wish, but trying to justify blatant nepotism only weakens their argument. You cannot claim to be fighting for democracy while applauding the concentration of power within one family. That is not democratic renewal. It is dynastic politics dressed up as a political movement.

Hopewell Chin’ono

43,960 views • 1 month ago

The Gandhi family has played a defining role in my political journey, not merely through leadership, but through the faith they placed in me at different stages of my life. I often reflect on Shri Rajiv Gandhi avaru, who saw potential in a young worker even before I could see it in myself. His encouragement gave me the confidence to dream bigger and dedicate myself to public service. The greatest leaders are those who identify possibilities in others and inspire them to rise beyond their own expectations. Rajiv Gandhi did exactly that for me. Smt. Sonia Gandhi avaru taught me another important lesson in leadership. True leaders do not stand by you only during moments of success; they stand beside you during your most difficult times, offering strength, encouragement and unwavering support. Her faith in me during challenging phases of my journey is something I will always cherish. Shri Rahul Gandhi avaru has been a constant source of guidance and inspiration. His willingness to listen, his conviction in democratic values, and his vision for a more inclusive and compassionate India continue to motivate leaders like me. His support has been a strong pillar throughout my public life. Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra avaru has always been approachable, warm and encouraging. She has treated every worker with respect and dignity, reminding us that politics is ultimately about connecting with people and understanding their aspirations. Her guidance and encouragement have always been deeply valued. For me, the Gandhi family represents different dimensions of leadership recognizing potential, standing by people in difficult times, listening with empathy, and inspiring others through conviction and service. As someone who began as a grassroots worker and has been entrusted today with the responsibility of leading Karnataka, I remain profoundly grateful for their trust and encouragement. Under their leadership and with the blessings of the people of Karnataka, I will continue to work with sincerity and commitment to build a progressive, inclusive and prosperous Karnataka that reflects the values we collectively stand for. Congress
1:49

The Gandhi family has played a defining role in my political journey, not merely through leadership, but through the faith they placed in me at different stages of my life. I often reflect on Shri Rajiv Gandhi avaru, who saw potential in a young worker even before I could see it in myself. His encouragement gave me the confidence to dream bigger and dedicate myself to public service. The greatest leaders are those who identify possibilities in others and inspire them to rise beyond their own expectations. Rajiv Gandhi did exactly that for me. Smt. Sonia Gandhi avaru taught me another important lesson in leadership. True leaders do not stand by you only during moments of success; they stand beside you during your most difficult times, offering strength, encouragement and unwavering support. Her faith in me during challenging phases of my journey is something I will always cherish. Shri Rahul Gandhi avaru has been a constant source of guidance and inspiration. His willingness to listen, his conviction in democratic values, and his vision for a more inclusive and compassionate India continue to motivate leaders like me. His support has been a strong pillar throughout my public life. Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra avaru has always been approachable, warm and encouraging. She has treated every worker with respect and dignity, reminding us that politics is ultimately about connecting with people and understanding their aspirations. Her guidance and encouragement have always been deeply valued. For me, the Gandhi family represents different dimensions of leadership recognizing potential, standing by people in difficult times, listening with empathy, and inspiring others through conviction and service. As someone who began as a grassroots worker and has been entrusted today with the responsibility of leading Karnataka, I remain profoundly grateful for their trust and encouragement. Under their leadership and with the blessings of the people of Karnataka, I will continue to work with sincerity and commitment to build a progressive, inclusive and prosperous Karnataka that reflects the values we collectively stand for. Congress

DK Shivakumar

63,636 views • 3 months ago

[WATCH] We must raise an uncomfortable but necessary issue: the rise of unethical behaviour within sections of the media, and the corrosive impact it is having on South Africa’s democracy. The African National Congress is gravely concerned by the growing pattern of what can only be described as captured journalism; a disturbing phenomenon where certain journalists are no longer reporting the news, but are actively involved in shaping political agendas, settling scores, and waging battles on behalf of those they align with or represent. This is not journalism; it is political warfare waged under the banner of the Fourth Estate. We respect media freedom, we fought for it but that freedom must never be confused with impunity. The South African public has a right to expect truth, balance, and accountability from its media; not scripted propaganda manufactured in the corridors of political handlers. #ThePeoplesMovement
3:36

[WATCH] We must raise an uncomfortable but necessary issue: the rise of unethical behaviour within sections of the media, and the corrosive impact it is having on South Africa’s democracy. The African National Congress is gravely concerned by the growing pattern of what can only be described as captured journalism; a disturbing phenomenon where certain journalists are no longer reporting the news, but are actively involved in shaping political agendas, settling scores, and waging battles on behalf of those they align with or represent. This is not journalism; it is political warfare waged under the banner of the Fourth Estate. We respect media freedom, we fought for it but that freedom must never be confused with impunity. The South African public has a right to expect truth, balance, and accountability from its media; not scripted propaganda manufactured in the corridors of political handlers. #ThePeoplesMovement

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

44,047 views • 1 year ago

His greatest "crime" is rejecting nepotism and advocating for freedom and democracy for all… His greatest "crime" is believing in the freedom of speech and political expression. The government of Uganda is responsible for ensuring his health, safety, and immediate release. East Africa should not be stained with the pleasure of bathing and swimming in the blood, tears, and sweat of the oppressed citizens. Every person is born free and has the right to express themselves and be treated with dignity. The right to freedom, protection of dignity, privacy, and personal security is not a political favor or a privilege granted by leadership—it is a fundamental right. It is imperative to act responsibly… Kizza Besigye must be treated humanely, and the oppression against him must stop immediately.
0:59

His greatest "crime" is rejecting nepotism and advocating for freedom and democracy for all… His greatest "crime" is believing in the freedom of speech and political expression. The government of Uganda is responsible for ensuring his health, safety, and immediate release. East Africa should not be stained with the pleasure of bathing and swimming in the blood, tears, and sweat of the oppressed citizens. Every person is born free and has the right to express themselves and be treated with dignity. The right to freedom, protection of dignity, privacy, and personal security is not a political favor or a privilege granted by leadership—it is a fundamental right. It is imperative to act responsibly… Kizza Besigye must be treated humanely, and the oppression against him must stop immediately.

Boniface Mwabukusi

29,653 views • 1 year ago

When a national address feels like a political speech, it raises serious questions. In the last 24 hours, Narendra Modi’s national address has drawn significant attention and criticism. Many viewers felt that instead of focusing on key national issues like delimitation, the speech leaned more toward political messaging, with repeated references to the opposition and women’s reservation. A national address is not a party rally. It is a moment meant to speak to the entire country. That is why such platforms are expected to remain balanced, focused, and above political lines. This is the same platform that has previously been used during critical moments, such as the COVID period or major national security updates, where the messaging was clear and unified. The concern here is about perception and timing. When expectations are high, any mismatch in tone or content becomes noticeable and can lead to public dissatisfaction. Constructive criticism plays an important role in a democracy. Support does not mean silence. In fact, honest feedback helps leadership stay grounded and effective. The larger point is simple. National platforms should remain national in spirit, not political in tone. Jai Hind. Jai Bharat. 🇮🇳
2:58

When a national address feels like a political speech, it raises serious questions. In the last 24 hours, Narendra Modi’s national address has drawn significant attention and criticism. Many viewers felt that instead of focusing on key national issues like delimitation, the speech leaned more toward political messaging, with repeated references to the opposition and women’s reservation. A national address is not a party rally. It is a moment meant to speak to the entire country. That is why such platforms are expected to remain balanced, focused, and above political lines. This is the same platform that has previously been used during critical moments, such as the COVID period or major national security updates, where the messaging was clear and unified. The concern here is about perception and timing. When expectations are high, any mismatch in tone or content becomes noticeable and can lead to public dissatisfaction. Constructive criticism plays an important role in a democracy. Support does not mean silence. In fact, honest feedback helps leadership stay grounded and effective. The larger point is simple. National platforms should remain national in spirit, not political in tone. Jai Hind. Jai Bharat. 🇮🇳

Praffulgarg

23,217 views • 5 months ago