Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Proposal Fails!

Dr. Clown, PhD

266,771 subscribers

15,259 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 BREAKING: The DEMOCRAT's proposal to keep the government open tonight FAILS in the US Senate.

🚨 BREAKING: The DEMOCRAT's proposal to keep the government open tonight FAILS in the US Senate.

Eric Daugherty

165,971 views • 10 months ago

The proposal to scrap jury trials rests on a fundamental misunderstanding of where justice actually fails. It is not juries that are too stupid to understand complex cases. It is often the legal process that has become too convoluted.

The proposal to scrap jury trials rests on a fundamental misunderstanding of where justice actually fails. It is not juries that are too stupid to understand complex cases. It is often the legal process that has become too convoluted.

David Davis MP

26,101 views • 7 months ago

US President Trump says he is “not satisfied” with Iran’s latest proposal for talks, insisting Iran must never obtain nuclear weapons as negotiations continue, and that military action remains “an option” if diplomacy fails. Al Jazeera's Alan Fisher reports.

US President Trump says he is “not satisfied” with Iran’s latest proposal for talks, insisting Iran must never obtain nuclear weapons as negotiations continue, and that military action remains “an option” if diplomacy fails. Al Jazeera's Alan Fisher reports.

Al Jazeera English

46,109 views • 3 months ago

The Speaker has floated a proposal to stop discharge petitions, which are a way for Members of the House to advance legislation when Leadership fails to act. That is an absolute nonstarter. The House would cease to be a majoritarian body.

The Speaker has floated a proposal to stop discharge petitions, which are a way for Members of the House to advance legislation when Leadership fails to act. That is an absolute nonstarter. The House would cease to be a majoritarian body.

Kevin Kiley

16,751 views • 8 months ago

NEW - European Parliament fails to reach majority (361) needed to reject the return of Chat Control 1.0, the "voluntary" mass scanning of private messages "to detect CSAM," extending its implementation to April 2028. The extension proposal was also previously rejected in March.

NEW - European Parliament fails to reach majority (361) needed to reject the return of Chat Control 1.0, the "voluntary" mass scanning of private messages "to detect CSAM," extending its implementation to April 2028. The extension proposal was also previously rejected in March.

Disclose.tv

126,203 views • 1 month ago

Right now, the House proposal fails to meet the moment. It does not meaningfully change spending (Medicaid expansion to able bodied, IRA subsidies). Plus many of the decent provisions and cuts, don’t begin until 2029 and beyond. That is swamp accounting to dodge real savings.

Right now, the House proposal fails to meet the moment. It does not meaningfully change spending (Medicaid expansion to able bodied, IRA subsidies). Plus many of the decent provisions and cuts, don’t begin until 2029 and beyond. That is swamp accounting to dodge real savings.

Chip Roy

153,745 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: Stani and Aave Labs rush a Christmas vote on the issue of Aave asset(s) ownership without community coordination. It seems like the Labs is trying to rush a conclusion to the issue before the DAO can coordinate, imo if this proposal fails AAVE should go to zero

BREAKING: Stani and Aave Labs rush a Christmas vote on the issue of Aave asset(s) ownership without community coordination. It seems like the Labs is trying to rush a conclusion to the issue before the DAO can coordinate, imo if this proposal fails AAVE should go to zero

Tulip King 🌷

118,968 views • 7 months ago

Andrew Ross Sorkin tries and fails to drag GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen through the details of his own proposal to buy eBay. The meme stock exec says he didn't approach eBay about the deal before announcing it and he's currently $14 billion short of the actual promised sale price.

Andrew Ross Sorkin tries and fails to drag GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen through the details of his own proposal to buy eBay. The meme stock exec says he didn't approach eBay about the deal before announcing it and he's currently $14 billion short of the actual promised sale price.

AmericanTruckSongs9

33,752 views • 3 months ago

🚨TOMORROW🚨 Minnesota fraud continues to dominate the news cycle, and Smug has a proposal that we need to address. PLUS, Jayme Leagh Franklin on young conservatives and our countdown of the best democrat fails from 2025. Join Josh Holmes, Comfortably Smug, Michael Duncan and John Ashbrook starting at 5am - link in replies.

🚨TOMORROW🚨 Minnesota fraud continues to dominate the news cycle, and Smug has a proposal that we need to address. PLUS, Jayme Leagh Franklin on young conservatives and our countdown of the best democrat fails from 2025. Join Josh Holmes, Comfortably Smug, Michael Duncan and John Ashbrook starting at 5am - link in replies.

Ruthless Podcast

35,639 views • 7 months ago

The House fails to pass a new GOP proposal, backed by President-elect Trump, to fund the government into March after dozens of Republicans refused to vote for the bill. Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️, (R) Nebraska, talks with Jim Sciutto about what could come next as a government shutdown looms.

The House fails to pass a new GOP proposal, backed by President-elect Trump, to fund the government into March after dozens of Republicans refused to vote for the bill. Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️, (R) Nebraska, talks with Jim Sciutto about what could come next as a government shutdown looms.

Anderson Cooper 360°

32,264 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Senior Hamas Official: New Trump-Witkoff Proposal Is a “Totally New” Text Al Jazeera spoke with Dr. Basem Naim, head of Hamas’s political and international relations, about the latest ceasefire developments. ➤ Dr. Naim said that one week ago, Hamas agreed with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff on a ceasefire proposal. However, when Witkoff returned from meetings with Israeli officials, he brought Hamas a “totally new” text that “had nothing to do with what we agreed upon.” ➤ According to Naim, the new proposal fails to address the “basics of our needs” and does not even guarantee a 60-day temporary ceasefire or ensure the inflow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. ➤ The proposal also lacks any guarantees for: — Ending the war through negotiations — Achieving a permanent ceasefire — Total withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Gaza Strip ➤ Instead, Naim said, the text “legitimizes” the U.S.-Israeli plan for aid distribution in Gaza - a model that has been rejected by the international community. ➤ The document also only mentions the “redeployment” of Israeli forces within Gaza, not their full withdrawal. It would require “negotiations from the beginning about the new redeployment plans within the 60 days,” he added. ➤ For these reasons, Naim said, Hamas has sought changes to the proposal in order to guarantee “the minimum of the needs of our people.” Drop Site’s latest report by jeremy scahill and Jawa Ahmad: “Hamas Responds to Witkoff Gaza Proposal, Demands Trump Guarantee Israel Won’t Resume Genocide,” details Hamas’s proposal to the latest U.S.-backed ceasefire terms. Link in reply.

🚨 Senior Hamas Official: New Trump-Witkoff Proposal Is a “Totally New” Text Al Jazeera spoke with Dr. Basem Naim, head of Hamas’s political and international relations, about the latest ceasefire developments. ➤ Dr. Naim said that one week ago, Hamas agreed with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff on a ceasefire proposal. However, when Witkoff returned from meetings with Israeli officials, he brought Hamas a “totally new” text that “had nothing to do with what we agreed upon.” ➤ According to Naim, the new proposal fails to address the “basics of our needs” and does not even guarantee a 60-day temporary ceasefire or ensure the inflow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. ➤ The proposal also lacks any guarantees for: — Ending the war through negotiations — Achieving a permanent ceasefire — Total withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Gaza Strip ➤ Instead, Naim said, the text “legitimizes” the U.S.-Israeli plan for aid distribution in Gaza - a model that has been rejected by the international community. ➤ The document also only mentions the “redeployment” of Israeli forces within Gaza, not their full withdrawal. It would require “negotiations from the beginning about the new redeployment plans within the 60 days,” he added. ➤ For these reasons, Naim said, Hamas has sought changes to the proposal in order to guarantee “the minimum of the needs of our people.” Drop Site’s latest report by jeremy scahill and Jawa Ahmad: “Hamas Responds to Witkoff Gaza Proposal, Demands Trump Guarantee Israel Won’t Resume Genocide,” details Hamas’s proposal to the latest U.S.-backed ceasefire terms. Link in reply.

Drop Site

10,428 views • 1 year ago

Good morning, Bankers! We have put together a short and informative video outlining our Asset Backed Launchpad Catalyst proposal. This initiative will enable future projects to create sustainable, vertical-backed businesses on Cardano by allowing owners to invest 50–100% of project mint funds immediately into proven revenue-earning ventures. These assets will extend project runways by providing sustainable funds for all project needs and build greater trust between founders and community members. As investors, you gain the added protection of knowing that if the project fails to meet expectations within reasonable timeframes, you can vote through our governance systems to reclaim the vertical assets and recover all (or at least a majority of) your initial investment. You can rest assured knowing that any project you choose to invest in will be #BackedByBank! You can read the full proposal here and we look forward to your support during Catalyst voting!

Good morning, Bankers! We have put together a short and informative video outlining our Asset Backed Launchpad Catalyst proposal. This initiative will enable future projects to create sustainable, vertical-backed businesses on Cardano by allowing owners to invest 50–100% of project mint funds immediately into proven revenue-earning ventures. These assets will extend project runways by providing sustainable funds for all project needs and build greater trust between founders and community members. As investors, you gain the added protection of knowing that if the project fails to meet expectations within reasonable timeframes, you can vote through our governance systems to reclaim the vertical assets and recover all (or at least a majority of) your initial investment. You can rest assured knowing that any project you choose to invest in will be #BackedByBank! You can read the full proposal here and we look forward to your support during Catalyst voting!

BankFi

11,300 views • 10 months ago

The Coalition has serious concerns about Labor’s clumsy effort to stamp out antisemitism. As drafted, it fails two basic tests: does it eradicate antisemitism, and does it crack down on radical Islamic extremism? Right now, it fails both. There are more than 500 pages and the term “radical Islam” is not mentioned once. If the Prime Minister cannot name the problem, he cannot tackle it. In the parliamentary inquiry, the Attorney General’s Department could not explain whether phrases like “globalise the intifada” or “from the river to the sea” would be captured by the law, nor whether an extremist fatwa would be treated as a religious text. The Parliament can and should criminalise antisemitic extremist hate preaching without impinging on free speech. But if the government cannot explain how its own legislation will work, the Parliament cannot be expected to vote for it, and the community will have no confidence in it. The Coalition will continue to scrutinise this proposal closely and engage constructively with the inquiry. But from what we have seen so far, it raises more questions than answers and appears unsalvageable.

The Coalition has serious concerns about Labor’s clumsy effort to stamp out antisemitism. As drafted, it fails two basic tests: does it eradicate antisemitism, and does it crack down on radical Islamic extremism? Right now, it fails both. There are more than 500 pages and the term “radical Islam” is not mentioned once. If the Prime Minister cannot name the problem, he cannot tackle it. In the parliamentary inquiry, the Attorney General’s Department could not explain whether phrases like “globalise the intifada” or “from the river to the sea” would be captured by the law, nor whether an extremist fatwa would be treated as a religious text. The Parliament can and should criminalise antisemitic extremist hate preaching without impinging on free speech. But if the government cannot explain how its own legislation will work, the Parliament cannot be expected to vote for it, and the community will have no confidence in it. The Coalition will continue to scrutinise this proposal closely and engage constructively with the inquiry. But from what we have seen so far, it raises more questions than answers and appears unsalvageable.

Sussan Ley

51,204 views • 6 months ago

“Troops for what — to fulfill the agenda of the occupied or to fulfill the agenda of the occupier? That’s the question.” Colombia’s Presidential Advisor for the Middle East Victor de Currea-Lugo told Drop Site News this is the concern his government has with the Trump-backed U.S. proposal at the UN for post-war Gaza, which envisions a foreign governing board and multinational troops charged with disarming Palestinians. He says Colombia does not oppose an international presence in itself, but warns that if the plan “will maintain the occupation,” extend Israel’s “impunity” and “military control… of the Palestinian community,” or limit Palestinians’ ability to build a real economy, “it doesn’t work.” Instead, he says Colombia supports “salvation troops” — engineers, medical teams, and other personnel meant to help “the Palestinian people to realize their own self-determination right,” which “is not just a slogan; it should be a reality.” “One big condition: self-determination. We cannot decide on behalf of the Palestinian people,” he reiterated. Any outside plan, including Trump’s, fails “if we impose our will.” jeremy scahill | Víctor De CurreaLugo

“Troops for what — to fulfill the agenda of the occupied or to fulfill the agenda of the occupier? That’s the question.” Colombia’s Presidential Advisor for the Middle East Victor de Currea-Lugo told Drop Site News this is the concern his government has with the Trump-backed U.S. proposal at the UN for post-war Gaza, which envisions a foreign governing board and multinational troops charged with disarming Palestinians. He says Colombia does not oppose an international presence in itself, but warns that if the plan “will maintain the occupation,” extend Israel’s “impunity” and “military control… of the Palestinian community,” or limit Palestinians’ ability to build a real economy, “it doesn’t work.” Instead, he says Colombia supports “salvation troops” — engineers, medical teams, and other personnel meant to help “the Palestinian people to realize their own self-determination right,” which “is not just a slogan; it should be a reality.” “One big condition: self-determination. We cannot decide on behalf of the Palestinian people,” he reiterated. Any outside plan, including Trump’s, fails “if we impose our will.” jeremy scahill | Víctor De CurreaLugo

Drop Site

25,800 views • 8 months ago

Qatar is attempting, on its own initiative, to negotiate an end to the war with Iran. Yes, according to those Western sources, if Qatar fails—and at the moment it appears it will—to end the war between the United States, Israel, and Iran, then it wants—and there’s no nicer way to put it—to bribe Iran so that it won’t attack Qatar itself. The proposal included the same money Dana spoke of, but this time through a local channel: six billion dollars—allegedly held by Qatar as funds belonging to the Revolutionary Guards—in exchange for Iran halting its attacks on Qatar. Incidentally, this is an event that causes immense embarrassment both to the Qataris and to Hamas, which is based in Qatar and supported by both the Qataris and the Iranians. Let’s just mention the response of a Qatari diplomat: “Qatar has not offered any economic or other deal to Iran in exchange for stopping the attacks. Such claims are complete fabrications and represent an attempt to drive a wedge between Qatar and the United States. These efforts,” says the Qatari diplomat, “will not succeed.”

Qatar is attempting, on its own initiative, to negotiate an end to the war with Iran. Yes, according to those Western sources, if Qatar fails—and at the moment it appears it will—to end the war between the United States, Israel, and Iran, then it wants—and there’s no nicer way to put it—to bribe Iran so that it won’t attack Qatar itself. The proposal included the same money Dana spoke of, but this time through a local channel: six billion dollars—allegedly held by Qatar as funds belonging to the Revolutionary Guards—in exchange for Iran halting its attacks on Qatar. Incidentally, this is an event that causes immense embarrassment both to the Qataris and to Hamas, which is based in Qatar and supported by both the Qataris and the Iranians. Let’s just mention the response of a Qatari diplomat: “Qatar has not offered any economic or other deal to Iran in exchange for stopping the attacks. Such claims are complete fabrications and represent an attempt to drive a wedge between Qatar and the United States. These efforts,” says the Qatari diplomat, “will not succeed.”

Amit Segal

252,621 views • 4 months ago

🚨 WOW! The victors in the Supreme Court's Callais ruling against racial gerrymandering are PUSHING to get a *6R-0D MAP* in Louisiana — NOT the state's newly proposed 5R-1D map YES, HARDBALL! 🔥 Under the proposal, only ONE cheated-in blue racial seat is removed. But one remains Callais plaintiffs want a FULLY constitutional map without a single racial seat. THEY ARE RIGHT. They're also accusing lawmakers of purposefully slow-walking the process to avoid having to get rid of that final blue seat. Southern Republicans need to FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT "None of the minor modifications to SB121 have removed these racial markers from District 2. Although the record is not yet complete, there is reason to believe that SB121 does not fully comply with the Supreme Court’s Callais decision." "If the Legislature fails to enact a new map by then or enacts SB121 without any substantial changes to the current structure, Plaintiffs may well ask the Court to schedule proceedings to impose a remedy that fully complies with Callais." "Plaintiffs seek to examine the Secretary of State now, in advance of June 1, to verify how much time is available to complete the remedial proceedings so Plaintiffs are not left in an unconstitutional gerrymander for the 2026 election."

🚨 WOW! The victors in the Supreme Court's Callais ruling against racial gerrymandering are PUSHING to get a 6R-0D MAP in Louisiana — NOT the state's newly proposed 5R-1D map YES, HARDBALL! 🔥 Under the proposal, only ONE cheated-in blue racial seat is removed. But one remains Callais plaintiffs want a FULLY constitutional map without a single racial seat. THEY ARE RIGHT. They're also accusing lawmakers of purposefully slow-walking the process to avoid having to get rid of that final blue seat. Southern Republicans need to FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT "None of the minor modifications to SB121 have removed these racial markers from District 2. Although the record is not yet complete, there is reason to believe that SB121 does not fully comply with the Supreme Court’s Callais decision." "If the Legislature fails to enact a new map by then or enacts SB121 without any substantial changes to the current structure, Plaintiffs may well ask the Court to schedule proceedings to impose a remedy that fully complies with Callais." "Plaintiffs seek to examine the Secretary of State now, in advance of June 1, to verify how much time is available to complete the remedial proceedings so Plaintiffs are not left in an unconstitutional gerrymander for the 2026 election."

Eric Daugherty

120,422 views • 2 months ago

Right now, we have all heard from Russia Putin’s highly predictable and manipulative words in response to the idea of a ceasefire on the front lines—at this moment he is, in fact, preparing to reject it. Of course, Putin is afraid to tell President Trump directly that he wants to continue this war and keep killing Ukrainians. That’s why, in Moscow, they are surrounding the ceasefire idea with such preconditions that it either fails or gets dragged out for as long as possible. Putin does this often—he doesn’t say ‘no’ outright, but he drags things out and makes reasonable solutions impossible. We see this as yet another round of Russian manipulation. There was a U.S. proposal for an unconditional ceasefire—in the air, at sea, and on the front lines. We in Ukraine accepted this proposal. We have heard from the American side that there is readiness to organize monitoring and verification. And this is absolutely feasible—with American and European capabilities. And during the ceasefire, to prepare answers to all questions about long-term security and a real, lasting peace, and to put a plan to end the war on the table. Ukraine is ready to work as quickly and constructively as possible. We have discussed this with U.S. representatives, and our European partners, as well as all our allies worldwide, are aware of it. We are not setting conditions that complicate the process—Russia is. As we have always said, the only one stalling, the only one being unconstructive, is Russia. They need this war. Putin has stolen years of peace and continues this war day after day. Now is the time to increase pressure on him. Sanctions must be applied—ones that will work. We will continue working with our American and European partners and with everyone in the world who wants peace—to force Russia to end this war.

Right now, we have all heard from Russia Putin’s highly predictable and manipulative words in response to the idea of a ceasefire on the front lines—at this moment he is, in fact, preparing to reject it. Of course, Putin is afraid to tell President Trump directly that he wants to continue this war and keep killing Ukrainians. That’s why, in Moscow, they are surrounding the ceasefire idea with such preconditions that it either fails or gets dragged out for as long as possible. Putin does this often—he doesn’t say ‘no’ outright, but he drags things out and makes reasonable solutions impossible. We see this as yet another round of Russian manipulation. There was a U.S. proposal for an unconditional ceasefire—in the air, at sea, and on the front lines. We in Ukraine accepted this proposal. We have heard from the American side that there is readiness to organize monitoring and verification. And this is absolutely feasible—with American and European capabilities. And during the ceasefire, to prepare answers to all questions about long-term security and a real, lasting peace, and to put a plan to end the war on the table. Ukraine is ready to work as quickly and constructively as possible. We have discussed this with U.S. representatives, and our European partners, as well as all our allies worldwide, are aware of it. We are not setting conditions that complicate the process—Russia is. As we have always said, the only one stalling, the only one being unconstructive, is Russia. They need this war. Putin has stolen years of peace and continues this war day after day. Now is the time to increase pressure on him. Sanctions must be applied—ones that will work. We will continue working with our American and European partners and with everyone in the world who wants peace—to force Russia to end this war.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

3,480,066 views • 1 year ago

ಬಂಡೀಪುರ ರಾತ್ರಿ ಸಂಚಾರ ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಸುವ ವಿಷಯಕ್ಕೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದಂತೆ ಉಪ ಮುಖ್ಯಮಂತ್ರಿಯವರು ಸಂವಾದ ನಡೆಸಲು ಕರೆ ನೀಡಿದಾಗ, ಯಾರು ವನ್ಯಜೀವಿಗಳ ಪರವಾಗಿ ನಿಲ್ಲುತ್ತಾರೆ ಎಂಬ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ಉದ್ಭವಿಸುತ್ತದೆ – ವನ್ಯಜೀವಿ ಪ್ರೇಮಿಗಳು, ಪರಿಸರವಾದಿಗಳು, ರಾಜಕಾರಣಿಗಳು, ಕನ್ನಡ ಪರ ಹೋರಾಟಗಾರರು, ಈ ಪ್ರದೇಶದಲ್ಲಿ ನೆಲೆ ಇರುವ ನಿವಾಸಿಗಳು, ಅರಣ್ಯ ಅಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ಯಾರು? ಕೇರಳದಿಂದ ಒತ್ತಡ ಹೆಚ್ಚಾಗುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೂ,ಈ ಹಿಂದಿನ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಸರ್ಕಾರಗಳು ರಾತ್ರಿ ಪ್ರಯಾಣ ನಿಷೇಧ ಜಾರಿಗೊಳಿಸಿದ್ದವು. ಬಂಡೀಪುರ ಪರಿಸರ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯನ್ನು ರಕ್ಷಿಸಲು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಕಟ್ಟುನಿಟ್ಟಿನ ಆದೇಶವನ್ನು ಸಹ ನೀಡಿದೆ. ಆದರೂ, ಈ ನಿಷೇಧವನ್ನು ತೆರವುಗೊಳಿಸುವ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಗಳನ್ನು ದೃಢವಾಗಿ ತಿರಸ್ಕರಿಸುವ ಬದಲು, ನಮ್ಮ ರಾಜ್ಯದ ಉಪ ಮುಖ್ಯಮಂತ್ರಿ ಚರ್ಚೆಗೆ ಒತ್ತಾಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಎಂದು ತೋರುತ್ತದೆ ಇದರ ಕುರಿತು ಅರಣ್ಯ ಸಚಿವ ಈಶ್ವರ ಖಂಡ್ರೆಯವರು ಸಹ ಪ್ರಸ್ತಾಪವನ್ನು ನಿರಾಕರಿಸುತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ. ವಯನಾಡ್ ಮತದಾರರನ್ನು ಸೆಳೆಯಲು ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಪಕ್ಷದ ಹೈಕಮಾಂಡ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಈ ಬೇಜವಾಬ್ದಾರಿಯ ತುಷ್ಟೀಕರಣದಿಂದಾಗಿ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕದ ವನ್ಯಜೀವಿ ಮತ್ತು ಪರಿಸರ ಪರಂಪರೆಯನ್ನು ಅಪಾಯಕ್ಕೆ ದೂಡಿದಂತಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಇಂತಹ ಕ್ರಮಗಳು ನಿಷ್ಪ್ರಯೋಜಕ ಹಾಗೂ ನ್ಯಾಯಸಮ್ಮತವಾದುದಲ್ಲ. When the Deputy CM calls for a "dialogue" on the Bandipur issue, who will stand up for the wildlife - the true and rightful inhabitants of this sanctuary? Despite mounting pressure from Kerala, previous Karnataka governments have stood firm in enforcing the night travel ban. The Supreme Court has issued a strict order to protect Bandipur’s fragile ecosystem. Yet, instead of firmly rejecting attempts to lift this ban, the Deputy CM seems to be pushing for discussions, while Forests Minister Eshwar Khandre fails to categorically deny the proposal. This irresponsible appeasement of Wayanad voters and the Congress High Command puts Karnataka’s invaluable wildlife and environmental heritage at risk. Such actions are both indefensible and completely unjustifiable. #ProtectBandipur #StandForWildlife #DKShivakmar #EshwarKhandre

ಬಂಡೀಪುರ ರಾತ್ರಿ ಸಂಚಾರ ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಸುವ ವಿಷಯಕ್ಕೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದಂತೆ ಉಪ ಮುಖ್ಯಮಂತ್ರಿಯವರು ಸಂವಾದ ನಡೆಸಲು ಕರೆ ನೀಡಿದಾಗ, ಯಾರು ವನ್ಯಜೀವಿಗಳ ಪರವಾಗಿ ನಿಲ್ಲುತ್ತಾರೆ ಎಂಬ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ಉದ್ಭವಿಸುತ್ತದೆ – ವನ್ಯಜೀವಿ ಪ್ರೇಮಿಗಳು, ಪರಿಸರವಾದಿಗಳು, ರಾಜಕಾರಣಿಗಳು, ಕನ್ನಡ ಪರ ಹೋರಾಟಗಾರರು, ಈ ಪ್ರದೇಶದಲ್ಲಿ ನೆಲೆ ಇರುವ ನಿವಾಸಿಗಳು, ಅರಣ್ಯ ಅಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ಯಾರು? ಕೇರಳದಿಂದ ಒತ್ತಡ ಹೆಚ್ಚಾಗುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೂ,ಈ ಹಿಂದಿನ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಸರ್ಕಾರಗಳು ರಾತ್ರಿ ಪ್ರಯಾಣ ನಿಷೇಧ ಜಾರಿಗೊಳಿಸಿದ್ದವು. ಬಂಡೀಪುರ ಪರಿಸರ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯನ್ನು ರಕ್ಷಿಸಲು ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಕಟ್ಟುನಿಟ್ಟಿನ ಆದೇಶವನ್ನು ಸಹ ನೀಡಿದೆ. ಆದರೂ, ಈ ನಿಷೇಧವನ್ನು ತೆರವುಗೊಳಿಸುವ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಗಳನ್ನು ದೃಢವಾಗಿ ತಿರಸ್ಕರಿಸುವ ಬದಲು, ನಮ್ಮ ರಾಜ್ಯದ ಉಪ ಮುಖ್ಯಮಂತ್ರಿ ಚರ್ಚೆಗೆ ಒತ್ತಾಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಎಂದು ತೋರುತ್ತದೆ ಇದರ ಕುರಿತು ಅರಣ್ಯ ಸಚಿವ ಈಶ್ವರ ಖಂಡ್ರೆಯವರು ಸಹ ಪ್ರಸ್ತಾಪವನ್ನು ನಿರಾಕರಿಸುತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ. ವಯನಾಡ್ ಮತದಾರರನ್ನು ಸೆಳೆಯಲು ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಪಕ್ಷದ ಹೈಕಮಾಂಡ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಈ ಬೇಜವಾಬ್ದಾರಿಯ ತುಷ್ಟೀಕರಣದಿಂದಾಗಿ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕದ ವನ್ಯಜೀವಿ ಮತ್ತು ಪರಿಸರ ಪರಂಪರೆಯನ್ನು ಅಪಾಯಕ್ಕೆ ದೂಡಿದಂತಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಇಂತಹ ಕ್ರಮಗಳು ನಿಷ್ಪ್ರಯೋಜಕ ಹಾಗೂ ನ್ಯಾಯಸಮ್ಮತವಾದುದಲ್ಲ. When the Deputy CM calls for a "dialogue" on the Bandipur issue, who will stand up for the wildlife - the true and rightful inhabitants of this sanctuary? Despite mounting pressure from Kerala, previous Karnataka governments have stood firm in enforcing the night travel ban. The Supreme Court has issued a strict order to protect Bandipur’s fragile ecosystem. Yet, instead of firmly rejecting attempts to lift this ban, the Deputy CM seems to be pushing for discussions, while Forests Minister Eshwar Khandre fails to categorically deny the proposal. This irresponsible appeasement of Wayanad voters and the Congress High Command puts Karnataka’s invaluable wildlife and environmental heritage at risk. Such actions are both indefensible and completely unjustifiable. #ProtectBandipur #StandForWildlife #DKShivakmar #EshwarKhandre

Yaduveer Wadiyar

31,032 views • 1 year ago

Yesterday, I spoke in the Westminster Hall debate on #DigitalID and I made my position clear: we must protect freedom, privacy, and public trust. Digital ID fails on all three. I strongly oppose this Labour Government’s planned mandatory digital identification scheme. In my view, it is a distraction from recent scandals and from the Labour Government’s continued failure to properly address illegal immigration. A digital ID card cuts across our English Common Law rights, the very foundations of our freedoms. And let’s be clear: a mandatory digital ID will not stop Channel crossings only a proper and effective deterrent will. Linking migration policy to digital ID also risks fuelling conspiracy theories, deepening public distrust, and distracting from real enforcement. France and Italy already have similar systems yet both still face major migration challenges. Successive governments have rejected ID cards for good reason. Keir Starmer made no mention of digital ID in his manifesto before the General Election, avoiding full public scrutiny of what is an intrusive and far-reaching proposal. A government-issued mandatory digital identity is not necessary for delivering online public services, verifying benefits or employment, or confirming immigration status. Government already holds this information, with existing safeguards in place. Introducing a compulsory digital ID would bring major security risks, a shift of power away from individuals, and huge costs to the taxpayer all for no clear benefit.

Yesterday, I spoke in the Westminster Hall debate on #DigitalID and I made my position clear: we must protect freedom, privacy, and public trust. Digital ID fails on all three. I strongly oppose this Labour Government’s planned mandatory digital identification scheme. In my view, it is a distraction from recent scandals and from the Labour Government’s continued failure to properly address illegal immigration. A digital ID card cuts across our English Common Law rights, the very foundations of our freedoms. And let’s be clear: a mandatory digital ID will not stop Channel crossings only a proper and effective deterrent will. Linking migration policy to digital ID also risks fuelling conspiracy theories, deepening public distrust, and distracting from real enforcement. France and Italy already have similar systems yet both still face major migration challenges. Successive governments have rejected ID cards for good reason. Keir Starmer made no mention of digital ID in his manifesto before the General Election, avoiding full public scrutiny of what is an intrusive and far-reaching proposal. A government-issued mandatory digital identity is not necessary for delivering online public services, verifying benefits or employment, or confirming immigration status. Government already holds this information, with existing safeguards in place. Introducing a compulsory digital ID would bring major security risks, a shift of power away from individuals, and huge costs to the taxpayer all for no clear benefit.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

11,936 views • 8 months ago

🚨INTERVIEW: “UKRAINE IS A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL STATE” Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 dismissed Trump's peace plan for Ukraine, calling it naive, claiming it ignores Ukraine’s internal repression and the broader structural roots of the war. He accused Ukraine’s security services of operating like a rogue force, targeting civilians, silencing dissent, and carrying out political violence - all while NATO turns a blind eye. He also argued the proposal fails to address Moscow’s core demand: a new European security architecture. “As for the points brought up in the peace deal, 600,000 troops, personally I think it should be zero troops [for Ukraine]. I think it’s dangerous for Ukraine to even maintain the SBU. Look at what these conscription officers are doing all across the country, rounding up innocent men, boys, old men, and seniors, sending them to the front line, beating them bloody as they force them to the front… It's horrible. I think Ukraine is a criminal state. The SBU has done countless assassinations, political blackmail, all across Europe, all across the United States… There needs to be serious reform inside of the Ukrainian leadership, the intelligence services, and the military. In the deal, it says NATO promises not to expand again. What are we going to do to confirm that? What are we going to do, to guarantee a new European security architecture, which is what Putin has been talking about since 2007? That’s not even addressed at all in this 28-point peace plan. There needs to be guarantees on both sides.”

🚨INTERVIEW: “UKRAINE IS A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL STATE” Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 dismissed Trump's peace plan for Ukraine, calling it naive, claiming it ignores Ukraine’s internal repression and the broader structural roots of the war. He accused Ukraine’s security services of operating like a rogue force, targeting civilians, silencing dissent, and carrying out political violence - all while NATO turns a blind eye. He also argued the proposal fails to address Moscow’s core demand: a new European security architecture. “As for the points brought up in the peace deal, 600,000 troops, personally I think it should be zero troops [for Ukraine]. I think it’s dangerous for Ukraine to even maintain the SBU. Look at what these conscription officers are doing all across the country, rounding up innocent men, boys, old men, and seniors, sending them to the front line, beating them bloody as they force them to the front… It's horrible. I think Ukraine is a criminal state. The SBU has done countless assassinations, political blackmail, all across Europe, all across the United States… There needs to be serious reform inside of the Ukrainian leadership, the intelligence services, and the military. In the deal, it says NATO promises not to expand again. What are we going to do to confirm that? What are we going to do, to guarantee a new European security architecture, which is what Putin has been talking about since 2007? That’s not even addressed at all in this 28-point peace plan. There needs to be guarantees on both sides.”

Mario Nawfal

19,849 views • 8 months ago