Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Protecting kids online means taking on some tough problems, so we’re banning social media accounts for under-16s. The way these platforms are built can harm children while they’re still finding their own way. No one knows this better than Mia, Rob and Emma, who have suffered the unimaginable loss...

395,608 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 33

Фото профиля Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏1 год назад

Labor allows Ped*Philes to work with children, you don’t care about children’s safety. This is all about control, surveillance & depriving kids of information that goes against the Woke Labor narrative

Фото профиля Lauren 🇦🇺
Lauren 🇦🇺1 год назад

You don't give a shit about protecting children, you lying bastard. If you did, you would ban porn and the trans indoctrination in schools. You just want to push digital id. You can fuck off, I will parent my children, not the government

Фото профиля What’s News!?
What’s News!?1 год назад

This is happening due to the collective worldwide pushback against mass immigration, multiculturalism, and Zionist infiltration, and we all know it. You and your commie crew are trying to make free speech illegal in our beautiful country. Our diggers would be rolling in their graves if they saw this...

Фото профиля three dogs
three dogs1 год назад

It’s 2025, not 1984. This is not about the kids. This is about the coercive control of political opinions by adults on social media

Фото профиля Aus Integrity
Aus Integrity1 год назад

Govern me harder daddy! You’re pathetic. Can’t face the music so you block it down. Australia hasn’t forgotten your response “if I was dictator for a day, I’d shut down social media”

Фото профиля LCHF Matt
LCHF Matt1 год назад

It’s not the job of government to raise our kids. Get out of our lives.

Фото профиля CM Tsui 🇦🇺
CM Tsui 🇦🇺1 год назад

This is totalitarianism. The "research" that the eSafety Commission cited that youtube is unsafe for children has already been reviewed through FOI request. It was just a small survey, and YouTube was on the lowest list of "harm", defined by the parents themselves. It doesn't matter. The urgency motion was passed. You wouldn't get the votes to pass the bill at it is. No one wants it. Google is going to sue. Keep trying harder and the whole country will be against you.

Фото профиля Live in Vic
Live in Vic1 год назад

Where is the public consultation? Where is the parliamentary debate? Where are the voices of everyday Australians being heard in these decisions? You won’t find them, because this move is not democratic. It’s coordinated. It’s evil.

Фото профиля Lachlan Phillips exo/acc 👾
Lachlan Phillips exo/acc 👾1 год назад

No you're not. You're introducing ID verification for all Australians. You're a censorious liar. Shame on you.

Фото профиля mdtlion
mdtlion1 год назад

Banning kids from YouTube while pushing Digital ID, censoring dissent, and outsourcing free speech to unelected bureaucrats. “We’re saving the kids”… by banning education, enabling surveillance, and letting technocrats like Inman Grant decide what’s “harmful.” You’re not fixing the problem. You are the problem.

Фото профиля Kobie Thatcher
Kobie Thatcher1 год назад

This is the job of parents, not the government. We all know it's nothing more than a push for censorship and Digital ID.

Фото профиля WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate
WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate1 год назад

Try and spin it anyway you like, but we know why, you're a weak pathetic little man who hates being called out.

Фото профиля 🇦🇺 JustWazza 🇦🇺
🇦🇺 JustWazza 🇦🇺1 год назад

Over to you Google. Sue their arse.

Фото профиля WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate
WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate1 год назад

Liar

Фото профиля NickSharples90🇦🇺
NickSharples90🇦🇺1 год назад

Get ready for a civil war soon over this cause its this type of shit is what starts them

Фото профиля Woodhouse
Woodhouse1 год назад

So, you were fine with algorithms when they were pushing child mutilation, but now that people have started talking about how the incompetent & treasonous ALP/Green/LNP/Teal uniparty is destroying the country with mass immigration & debt, suddenly everyone has to be censored?

Фото профиля chris barber🇦🇺
chris barber🇦🇺1 год назад

We will keep our own kids safe Especially from retarded fuckwits like you and your mates Fuck off

Фото профиля Monica Smit / Reignite Democracy
Monica Smit / Reignite Democracy1 год назад

But 4 years olds can decide their gender lol

Фото профиля WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate
WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate1 год назад

You're banning them for everyone that won't submit their ID

Фото профиля Jason Olbourne
Jason Olbourne1 год назад

So a 12 year old can take an experimental jab behind their parents back in 2021 but the same year 11 kid cannot access YouTube kids today but your party want them to vote when they turn 16 compulsorily. You guys are not progressive but power predators playing for yourselves. Zero consistency. All self serving under the guise of safety. Why be a parent just have the government breed.

Фото профиля Maureen Doyle
Maureen Doyle1 год назад

Sadly @AlboMP you already had outlined what you hated most and it was Social Media. This is not about Mia,Rob & Emma. This is about you becoming a Dictator and stifling SM the way you have stifled our Freedom of Speech. You dont care what Australians want. You are a traitor.

Фото профиля BENEATHD33P
BENEATHD33P1 год назад

Prime Minister, banning teens from social media isn’t protection, it’s abdication. You’re not raising resilient Australians. You’re raising wards of the state. Don’t weaponise grief to justify censorship. We see right through you, the people employ you to represent not rule us.

Фото профиля Ted Bullpit
Ted Bullpit1 год назад

Stop your habitual lying…it’s pathological. It’s disgustingly slimy to incongruously use the memories of these kids to push your agenda.

Фото профиля Solo Monk
Solo Monk1 год назад

There is a genocide underway that you support..... you protecting kids? Fck off.

Фото профиля Total Eclipse 🇦🇺
Total Eclipse 🇦🇺1 год назад

Why are you copying Keir Starmer's policies? He's a disaster who is destroying Great Britain with the same destructive policies that you are forcing on the Australian people. Starmer turned a blind eye to the grooming, r*pe, torture and murder of thousands upon thousands of young British girls, and, to ensure he doesn't lose his Muslim voter base, he protected the perpetrators of these horrific crimes. You're in lockstep with Starmer's Oneline Safety (aka Online Suppression) policy, which has been confirmed by many as suppression of free speech dressed up as child safety, with Brits of any age unable to access social media/information unless they verify their identity. In addition, and again in lockstep with Keir, you show your willingness to reward Hamas terrorists with a state, despite the atrocities they committed on 7th Oct 2023 and to this day are still holding hostages. You also pushed Hamas propaganda, using children with chronic health conditions as a weapon against Israel. Disgusting. During the election campaign, In your attempt to smear Peter Dutton and link him to the great DJT, you asserted on several occasions that we don't need to copy other countries or seek our inspiration overseas, yet here you are doing just that. You are the worst Prime Minister our great country has ever had to endure.

Фото профиля Lewis
Lewis1 год назад

I will make the decisions regarding my child, thank you. You stick to what you're supposed to be doing - fixing the fucking mess you have created. Housing crisis, uncontrolled immigration, record numbers of small businesses going under, power prices on the up and up. Fuckhead.

Фото профиля Bridge to the Overman 🇦🇺
Bridge to the Overman 🇦🇺1 год назад

You are insane authoritarians. It is parents who safeguard their children - not the authoritarian government that will decide what political narratives are safe for viewing on which online platforms and which need to be censored.

Фото профиля Casey Handmer
Casey Handmer1 год назад

So young people have no vote, no pension, no jobs or homes or prospects they can hope to access, and now they have no way to explore the world beyond their own family and classroom? Imagine ignoring the tens of thousands of people saved by online communities, who learned a trade through YouTube, who built a network through Facebook, to preference an impossible counter factual on the basis of a few children whose desperate loss their families blame on social media. This is just about control and it's not even subtle.

Фото профиля Reflex
Reflex1 год назад

Your a damn liar. It’s not about the kids or you’d have banned porn. It’s about digital control. We will be using Starlink with VPN and you can get fucked.

Фото профиля edsock11
edsock111 год назад

Fuck off albo. All you care about is silencing dissent. Won’t happen. We hate your guts

Фото профиля WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate
WakeUpBeforeItsTooLate1 год назад

This is you going after free speech and not protecting kids.

Фото профиля Based Brief
Based Brief1 год назад

But you’ll allow 12 year olds to take harmful puberty blockers… make it make sense…

Фото профиля Holyhekatuiteka
Holyhekatuiteka1 год назад

Authoritarian shit heads. It was only last year you freaks had your dis & misinformation bill laughed out of the parliament - you wanted to make it illegal to deny climate change .. everyone knows what this is, it’s to censor and control. I can’t believe Australia voted again for this Marxist muppet. Then again Oz suffers from major Uni party disorder, like the UK. Get MMP.

Похожие видео

Nearly 300,000 unaccompanied migrant children were left unaccounted for under the Biden administration. Tom Homan says the Trump administration has now found more than 157,000 of them. In the process, he says they discovered that more than 20 had died, including some from drug overdoses and violence. But the search continues, and Homan says the administration will keep looking through its last day in office. “The first day President Trump called me and asked me to come back, he asked me to do 3 things: secure the border, run a deportation operation, and find these kids.” “I told President Trump… the children will be the most difficult because they’ll be tough to find because we’d have to count on the digital footprint of the sponsors and the information the sponsors provided, which we know wasn’t good.” “So when we finally got back in, we started pulling the information, looking for these kids.” “A lot of the IDs presented were wrong names.” “Under President Trump’s leadership, as of last week, we’re just over 157,000 children found.” “We got more to find.” “Over 20 have died, some from natural causes, some from drug overdoses, some from violence.” “Now, a lot of these children that we’re still looking for have aged out. They’re 18-19 years old.” “But as I told the President, just because they’re 18 and 19 doesn’t mean they’re not in forced labor or sex trafficking.” “So we’re going to keep running down every one of these leads until we find them.” “And when we finish with all the leads we have, we’re going to do it again.” “So we’re not giving up.” “President Trump has promised that we’re going to look at this until the last day of the administration.” “And the American people can have my word that we’re going to do that.”

Jan Jekielek

13,951 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

28,757 просмотров • 1 год назад

I’ve been talking to heaps of parents about the U16 Social Media Ban that’s due to commence in about 5 weeks. It seems most parents haven’t told their kids yet about the upcoming ban and a couple of parents weren’t even aware it was happening. As of Dec 10th anyone under the age of 16 is going to lose access to their Facebook, Insta, YouTube and Snapchat accounts. YouTube seems to be the one that is used the most and many parents are simply planning to log their children into their own accounts so that their kids can continue using the platform. The user habits of both parents and kids on the same account is no doubt going to confuse the age assurance predictions that most of these tech companies have implemented for the u16 ban. This will result in parents having to provide identification to prove their age and continued use of their accounts. The government wanting to play parent to both adults and children in Australia means that kids are going to potentially be exposed to more harmful content online and it will also create privacy issues as a result of adults having to supply their ID and other personal information to these data harvesting social platforms. The ban is also going to be rolled out just as most kids are starting the long Summer break which means many children will loose contact and online social interactions with many of their friends and family over the Christmas period. The only positive thing that will results from this is that there will be approx 2.5 million kids who grow up hating the government and its control overreach.

Miss Madeleine

33,826 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Shuler: Look, none of this is going to be easy. Those same CEOs and billionaires I spoke about earlier who’ve gotten wealthier by the minute, they’re using that money to buy influence, to buy these midterms. The 50 biggest individual political donors have already spent more than $1.6 billion on the 2026 election cycle. Our answer is people talking to people. It’s the trust, the relationships that union workers have all over America. We are the antidote to billionaire money. In our polling this year, workers told us there’s only one group in this country they trust more than unions, and it’s their own neighbors. That shouldn’t really surprise us, because union members are people’s neighbors. We’re the nurse down the street, the teacher in your kid’s classroom, the people who coach Little League, volunteer at the food pantry, and sit next to each other at church. Those relationships and the trust that comes with them are a superpower that no other institution has. And as we mobilize every day from now until November, that’s what we’re going to lean on. Billionaires can buy their yachts, they can buy their rocket ships, but they cannot buy our democracy, and we are not going to let them try. One midterm election is not going to fix every problem. It won’t fix our broken labor laws overnight. It won’t organize 2 million more workers into unions. We have to do those things, and we will. But winning in November, righting the ship, puts us directly on that path. So from now until November 3rd, every day is an all-out sprint. We are the only movement that can do this at scale, that has the trust, the infrastructure, the know-how. We’re going to talk to workers who are frustrated, who have never voted before, who have stopped believing that politics can deliver for them. And our message is simple. We have power. Our vote gives us power. Our voice on the job gives us power, and our unions give us power. And when millions of workers act together, no billionaire can beat us. Working people are hurting. Working people are angry. But this Labor Day, the state of the unions is clear. We’re motivated, we’re mobilized, we’re ready, and we’re going to win. 63 days left. Let’s make sure every single one counts.

Acyn

24,251 просмотров • 28 дней назад