Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 PROTEST AGAINST CHARLIE KIRK “HATE SPEECH”⁉️ Look at this pathetic tiny protest I caught at the Heritage Foundation in front of his BEAUTIFUL banner: Get married. Have children. Build a legacy. THIS is what they call “HATE SPEECH” and “RAClSM”? Free promo for Charlie! 🤣✊🏻

NaomiSeibt's profile picture

Naomi Seibt

469,397 subscribers

11,619 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

CALL TO HONOR: Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry urges LSU to honor the legacy of Charlie Kirk with a statue on campus. "There is no better warrior for free speech than Charlie Kirk, and we must continue his legacy on every campus in America."
0:29

CALL TO HONOR: Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry urges LSU to honor the legacy of Charlie Kirk with a statue on campus. "There is no better warrior for free speech than Charlie Kirk, and we must continue his legacy on every campus in America."

Fox News

64,544 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Here is Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s “hate speech” statement in full context. The broader context does not attenuate what is fundamentally wrong about what she is proposing. She confounds university *policy* with criminal prosecution of “hate speech”. She confounds “hate” *crime* with “hate *speech*”. And she actually contradicts herself by specifically acknowledging how Charlie Kirk’s political messaging was seen as “obscene” to others. Nobody wants the government prosecution of “hate speech”. If you want to know where that road goes, look at the United Kingdom or Canada. People want the application of *existing law*. More law = less justice. I cannot purport to claim what Charlie would have wanted. But for Pam to suggest Charlie would have wanted government criminalization of so-called “hate speech” is fundamentally antithetical to everything Charlie did in his life. Bondi has screwed up at every step of her stewardship of the DOJ. She is unfit for the position.
2:35

Here is Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s “hate speech” statement in full context. The broader context does not attenuate what is fundamentally wrong about what she is proposing. She confounds university *policy* with criminal prosecution of “hate speech”. She confounds “hate” *crime* with “hate *speech*”. And she actually contradicts herself by specifically acknowledging how Charlie Kirk’s political messaging was seen as “obscene” to others. Nobody wants the government prosecution of “hate speech”. If you want to know where that road goes, look at the United Kingdom or Canada. People want the application of *existing law*. More law = less justice. I cannot purport to claim what Charlie would have wanted. But for Pam to suggest Charlie would have wanted government criminalization of so-called “hate speech” is fundamentally antithetical to everything Charlie did in his life. Bondi has screwed up at every step of her stewardship of the DOJ. She is unfit for the position.

Viva Frei

62,181 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

CRINGE. Leftist students at the University of Minnesota held a protest denouncing Charlie Kirk and instead honoring George Floyd. They're praising a convicted felon over a Free Speech advocate...
1:22

CRINGE. Leftist students at the University of Minnesota held a protest denouncing Charlie Kirk and instead honoring George Floyd. They're praising a convicted felon over a Free Speech advocate...

Libs of TikTok

415,551 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

This entire hate speech debate in the Supreme Court is puerile and reeks of hypocrisy and cowardice. Who decides what is hate speech? Here, I dare milords to have the guts to call the public recitation of the verse claiming ‘Hindus are the worst of creatures’ as hate speech:
0:56

This entire hate speech debate in the Supreme Court is puerile and reeks of hypocrisy and cowardice. Who decides what is hate speech? Here, I dare milords to have the guts to call the public recitation of the verse claiming ‘Hindus are the worst of creatures’ as hate speech:

Anand Ranganathan

118,140 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I’m calling on LSU to honor the legacy of Charlie Kirk by putting up a statue of him on campus. There is no better warrior for free speech than Charlie Kirk, and we must continue his legacy on every campus in America. 🇺🇸
0:29

I’m calling on LSU to honor the legacy of Charlie Kirk by putting up a statue of him on campus. There is no better warrior for free speech than Charlie Kirk, and we must continue his legacy on every campus in America. 🇺🇸

Governor Jeff Landry

6,289,833 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨What the fuck is this!? 🤣 Stand Up To Racism in Oxford yesterday using their right to free speech to protest against free speech! 😂 Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 Make this make sense - it’s a mental illness
1:17

🚨What the fuck is this!? 🤣 Stand Up To Racism in Oxford yesterday using their right to free speech to protest against free speech! 😂 Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 Make this make sense - it’s a mental illness

Gauci Reports

71,215 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

‼️Tyler Bowyer ADMITS Charlie Believed 'Hate Speech' Is PROTECTED Speech—Meanwhile Turning Point 2.0 Is Violating Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Dying Beliefs! 👀 While the "new" leadership tries to weaponize Charlie’s memory to cancel and sue his friends, Tyler Bowyer just accidentally admitted the truth: Turning Point 2.0 is violating the very principles Charlie Kirk lived and died for. In this clip, Tyler Bowyer—one of Charlie’s closest allies—is asked how Charlie would react to the current impulse to cancel, silence, or sue people speaking critically of him in the wake of his assassination. The answer is devastating for the people currently running the show: Charlie would be 100% against it. "He would reject it." —Tyler Bowyer Tyler reveals that just one week before his murder, Charlie was adamant that "bad speech, hate speech, and negative speech" are all protected under the First Amendment. He rejected the "cancel culture" impulse entirely. Despite Charlie’s clear stance, the leadership at Turning Point 2.0 (and their allies at the Daily Wire) are doing the exact opposite. They are currently engaged in a massive "lawfare" campaign—suing and attempting to bankrupt Candace Owens, independent researchers, and anyone else who dares to "notice" the inconsistencies in the official narrative. They are using Charlie’s death to justify the very censorship he fought against his entire career. They claim to be "protecting his legacy" while they dismantle his core belief in the right to associate and speak freely. Notice how the interviewer tries to pivot to "firing people" being part of free speech. This is the exact excuse the Daily Wire used to fire Candace and the same logic being used to justify the legal hit jobs against us. They call it the "right to associate," but we call it what it is: The targeted destruction of dissent. Charlie Kirk built a movement on the idea that we don't silence our opponents—we out-argue them. Turning Point 2.0 has abandoned that for the weaponization of the courtroom and advocating of hate speech laws. The king is gone, and the guards are now burning his books. RT if you want the REAL Charlie Kirk legacy protected, not the corporate version. 👇
1:41

‼️Tyler Bowyer ADMITS Charlie Believed 'Hate Speech' Is PROTECTED Speech—Meanwhile Turning Point 2.0 Is Violating Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Dying Beliefs! 👀 While the "new" leadership tries to weaponize Charlie’s memory to cancel and sue his friends, Tyler Bowyer just accidentally admitted the truth: Turning Point 2.0 is violating the very principles Charlie Kirk lived and died for. In this clip, Tyler Bowyer—one of Charlie’s closest allies—is asked how Charlie would react to the current impulse to cancel, silence, or sue people speaking critically of him in the wake of his assassination. The answer is devastating for the people currently running the show: Charlie would be 100% against it. "He would reject it." —Tyler Bowyer Tyler reveals that just one week before his murder, Charlie was adamant that "bad speech, hate speech, and negative speech" are all protected under the First Amendment. He rejected the "cancel culture" impulse entirely. Despite Charlie’s clear stance, the leadership at Turning Point 2.0 (and their allies at the Daily Wire) are doing the exact opposite. They are currently engaged in a massive "lawfare" campaign—suing and attempting to bankrupt Candace Owens, independent researchers, and anyone else who dares to "notice" the inconsistencies in the official narrative. They are using Charlie’s death to justify the very censorship he fought against his entire career. They claim to be "protecting his legacy" while they dismantle his core belief in the right to associate and speak freely. Notice how the interviewer tries to pivot to "firing people" being part of free speech. This is the exact excuse the Daily Wire used to fire Candace and the same logic being used to justify the legal hit jobs against us. They call it the "right to associate," but we call it what it is: The targeted destruction of dissent. Charlie Kirk built a movement on the idea that we don't silence our opponents—we out-argue them. Turning Point 2.0 has abandoned that for the weaponization of the courtroom and advocating of hate speech laws. The king is gone, and the guards are now burning his books. RT if you want the REAL Charlie Kirk legacy protected, not the corporate version. 👇

Project Constitution

18,825 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk. As a former political prisoner from Iran, I stand with Charlie. I have seen with my own eyes what the lack of free speech does to a country. There is a reason free speech is the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Free speech is the core value of Western civilization. We should not let radical leftists, Islamists, those who advocate for cancel culture, and the fake news media bury the truth. The assassination of Charlie must be condemned unconditionally, and those responsible for this barbaric act must be held accountable. Charlie was a hero.
1:02

Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk. As a former political prisoner from Iran, I stand with Charlie. I have seen with my own eyes what the lack of free speech does to a country. There is a reason free speech is the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Free speech is the core value of Western civilization. We should not let radical leftists, Islamists, those who advocate for cancel culture, and the fake news media bury the truth. The assassination of Charlie must be condemned unconditionally, and those responsible for this barbaric act must be held accountable. Charlie was a hero.

Salman Sima

78,523 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Antifa protestors disrupt a Charlie Kirk memorial event at Manchester University, stealing a poster of Charlie and ripping it to shreds. Later, they held his head up - as if beheaded. The free speech crisis at British universities is crippling. 👇
0:28

Antifa protestors disrupt a Charlie Kirk memorial event at Manchester University, stealing a poster of Charlie and ripping it to shreds. Later, they held his head up - as if beheaded. The free speech crisis at British universities is crippling. 👇

Lois McLatchie Miller

48,773 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨BREAKING --THE ENTIRE CANADIAN PARLIAMENT RISES TO REMEMBER CHARLIE KIRK "Charlie was an advocate for faith, family and Freedom" "may we join our hearts with Charlie's wife and his 2 young children. Rest in peace Charlie" What a speech!!
1:20

🚨BREAKING --THE ENTIRE CANADIAN PARLIAMENT RISES TO REMEMBER CHARLIE KIRK "Charlie was an advocate for faith, family and Freedom" "may we join our hearts with Charlie's wife and his 2 young children. Rest in peace Charlie" What a speech!!

Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

147,314 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Rep. Rep. Justin Jones on State Representative Gino Bulso’s Charlie Kirk Act for college campuses: “This isn’t about protecting free speech. It’s about protecting a certain type of speech— white supremacist violence and hate speech that sees people like us as not worthy.”
3:43

Rep. Rep. Justin Jones on State Representative Gino Bulso’s Charlie Kirk Act for college campuses: “This isn’t about protecting free speech. It’s about protecting a certain type of speech— white supremacist violence and hate speech that sees people like us as not worthy.”

The Tennessee Holler

28,244 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 D€ATH THREATS FOR ALICE WEIDEL‼️ Radical leftist symbolically pretends to slice his throat at Alice Weidel’s speech. They want to kiII AfD supporters!!! The German legacy media have been justifying the a*sassination of Charlie Kirk and enable the same violence in Germany.
0:31

🚨 D€ATH THREATS FOR ALICE WEIDEL‼️ Radical leftist symbolically pretends to slice his throat at Alice Weidel’s speech. They want to kiII AfD supporters!!! The German legacy media have been justifying the a*sassination of Charlie Kirk and enable the same violence in Germany.

Naomi Seibt

484,545 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Tucker Carlson: "To hear calls for de-platforming and denouncing people at a Charlie Kirk event. I'm like, what? This is hilarious…The last several months of Charlie's life were devoted, in part, to arguing about this event, in fact this speech, in fact my speech, here."
2:21

Tucker Carlson: "To hear calls for de-platforming and denouncing people at a Charlie Kirk event. I'm like, what? This is hilarious…The last several months of Charlie's life were devoted, in part, to arguing about this event, in fact this speech, in fact my speech, here."

The Bulwark

162,207 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The Chief Rabbi calls for stronger hate speech laws despite previously calling for Muslim refugees to be welcomed in large numbers. This is what Charlie Kirk was criticising before he died. Jews who support mass migration then call for censorship when the inevitable happens.
0:26

The Chief Rabbi calls for stronger hate speech laws despite previously calling for Muslim refugees to be welcomed in large numbers. This is what Charlie Kirk was criticising before he died. Jews who support mass migration then call for censorship when the inevitable happens.

Wolf 🐺

51,793 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The full context of Pam Bondi's "hate speech" comments yesterday is insane. Katie Miller says hatred of conservatives on college campuses led to Charlie Kirk's death. Bondi responds by saying antisemitism on college campuses is the real issue at hand, and what the government needs to be focused on, "especially after what happened to Charlie." She then uses Charlie's death to justify unconstitutional prosecution of "hate speech," and spends the next 40 seconds talking about prosecuting antisemitism. I take back what I said yesterday. I don't think Pam Bondi is an idiot, I think she's working on behalf of foreign interests to clamp down on free speech in America –– and I know for a fact Charlie would've spoken out against it.
1:38

The full context of Pam Bondi's "hate speech" comments yesterday is insane. Katie Miller says hatred of conservatives on college campuses led to Charlie Kirk's death. Bondi responds by saying antisemitism on college campuses is the real issue at hand, and what the government needs to be focused on, "especially after what happened to Charlie." She then uses Charlie's death to justify unconstitutional prosecution of "hate speech," and spends the next 40 seconds talking about prosecuting antisemitism. I take back what I said yesterday. I don't think Pam Bondi is an idiot, I think she's working on behalf of foreign interests to clamp down on free speech in America –– and I know for a fact Charlie would've spoken out against it.

SOVEREIGN BRAH 🇺🇸🏛️⚡️

347,497 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce