Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Protium Cannon 2 - I am literally shooting for the moon You cannot pressurize gunpowder - this you can Every other fuel requires an oxygen/oxidizer - this does not Every other fuel uses hydrocarbons - this does not Every other fuel cannot explode in a vacuum - this can

197,387 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 35

Фото профиля Jim McPherson
Jim McPherson1 месяц назад

This is a potato gun. Nothing more.

Фото профиля Inventor_Michael
Inventor_Michael1 месяц назад

what would happen if I shot down a starlink satellite. Like how mad would you really be?

Фото профиля Inventor_Michael
Inventor_Michael1 месяц назад

aren’t you, just a little curious?

Фото профиля Taxonomist
Taxonomist1 месяц назад

Wrong from the very first sentence. Been there, done that. (180 km in 1966) Though I applaud your work and encourage your continued progress.

Фото профиля Mike Guess
Mike Guess1 месяц назад

It’s a lit-up potato gun shooting golf balls. He’s lying because in the video he admits it’s a hydrogen and oxygen cannon (oxyhydrogen mix). Hydrogen needs an oxidizer to combust or explode—pure protium does not magically do either in vacuum or anywhere else. The “no oxidizer needed” claim is pure fiction to hype a backyard combustion launcher as revolutionary moon tech. Escape velocity is about 11km/s. That speed would shred any golfball. lol… His potato gun MAYBE hits 100 METERS PER SECOND. Not to mention that he’d need a second boost if he wants to put anything into orbit. It’s physics.

Фото профиля FormerIrleneMandrellSuperfan
FormerIrleneMandrellSuperfan1 месяц назад

Looks stupid and fake.

Фото профиля Nick Jackson
Nick Jackson1 месяц назад

How confident are you that you can launch a projectile like a 50 gallon drum of water into space, not destroying it and accurately enough to get it into orbit? I'd love to see this work but there are a number of physics challenges. The spin boys couldn't do it..

Фото профиля Inventor_Michael
Inventor_Michael1 месяц назад

100% and I could build the whole thing for $1m. I even have a special freezing method to ensure its survival. That’s cannon 4. It’s built underground. You could put a gun to my head, and my answer is the same. My kids head. That’s how sure I am.

Фото профиля Hubert Kunnemeyer
Hubert Kunnemeyer1 месяц назад

Sure. Cmon. It’s fucking plastic. Nice light show though. Into space LOL. 😂 You could launch a golf ball further with a baseball bat.

Фото профиля Dillen
Dillen1 месяц назад

I also tried to invent a light gas gun once. You will run into the same issues as me. Ablation is your biggest issue. The projectile will melt into plasma without ridiculous heavy shielding, and the mass needed for a practical projectile will exceed the amount of force you can generate to counter drag, and gravitational pull.

Фото профиля The Local Residents
The Local Residents1 месяц назад

At least this guy is having fun with his glorified potato gun, some led strips and a story to go along with his big imagination.

Фото профиля SOvXI iF
SOvXI iF1 месяц назад

You designing this:

Фото профиля Eric Henderson
Eric Henderson1 месяц назад

LED light strips are not an engineering feat

Фото профиля Check Hook 🤪💥🥊💨
Check Hook 🤪💥🥊💨1 месяц назад

“Where the fk that come from?”

Фото профиля Albert Johnson
Albert Johnson1 месяц назад

Dr. Gerald Bull started the company Space Research with the goal of launching satellites using a 3 foot diameter howitzer. He later was assazzinated by an Israeli hit squad.

Фото профиля Grumpy Dad
Grumpy Dad1 месяц назад

…….. k

Фото профиля Robert Patrick Wills
Robert Patrick Wills1 месяц назад

You'll put your eye out.

Фото профиля Chudmaxxer
Chudmaxxer1 месяц назад

Overhyped RGB potato cannon, so much wow...

Фото профиля The Salt Cavern
The Salt Cavern1 месяц назад

Maybe you could hit the fake space station that's underwater. Maybe you could find the fake space above the dome?

Фото профиля Harmonious Roar
Harmonious Roar1 месяц назад

Dude, the gov will take that, classifying it as a threat to national security if you're not careful. Could that same tech be applied to automobile engines or electricity production?

Фото профиля Sneaky Fox Jr. 🇺🇸
Sneaky Fox Jr. 🇺🇸1 месяц назад

Yeah, I think your machine is bullshit because if it worked, you would’ve not sat here for this amount of time showing nothing. I mean, I used to build potato guns like this in my garage back in the 70s and we used acetylene

Фото профиля anon
anon1 месяц назад

A hydrogen explosion still needs a oxidizer. In this case its just oxygen. Electrolysis does split water into oxygen and hydrogen ,but your description is technically wrong.

Фото профиля Neo Baggins
Neo Baggins1 месяц назад

So, you’re off on a few core concepts. ‘Going to space’ isn’t a matter of throwing a ball straight up into the air. Unless you can accelerate said ball to 25k mph so it escapes earth’s gravitational sphere and enters a solar orbit, it’s coming right back down. Even if you angle your trajectory and can achieve high enough instantaneous acceleration to retain the required velocity after atmospheric drag has slowed it on its much longer atmospheric trajectory, your ball is still suborbital. You need a second stage to raise your periapsis and achieve LEO. So now you need to launch another potato gun that can survive the instantaneous acceleration, the frictional heating during its atmospheric ascent, and then reorient itself to fire the projectile you want in orbit prograde, but on a new, orbital trajectory. Now this raises a new problem, because that second stage potato cannon has to be of significant enough mass to minimize its reaction to the momentum exchange between it and the final payload. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The energy of the explosion is exerting equal force on the potato gun, pushing it in the opposite direction you want the projectile to go, and an equal and opposite force on the projectile. So I rate this project as bogus as the guy claiming he was building blimps to go to space. Space isn’t orbit and not enough people understand this fact.

Фото профиля eBuck
eBuck1 месяц назад

They will never make it unless they shape the projectile like a rocket, golf ball has waaaaay too much drag

Фото профиля ceiling bird
ceiling bird1 месяц назад

Letting browns on the internet was a huge mistake

Фото профиля D T henry
D T henry1 месяц назад

Air and friction says your lying lol, you need to propel an object 11 miles In To space vertically is not possible physics and gravity say no. Even rockets can't do that, that's why they travel in a ark to use the earth gravitational forces.

Фото профиля HØØN¹³
HØØN¹³1 месяц назад

No. Nice little trick to get some ad rev though I guess.

Фото профиля Cyber Ohio
Cyber Ohio1 месяц назад

Nonsense

Фото профиля Hank 🇺🇸
Hank 🇺🇸1 месяц назад

Absolutely love the idea & enthusiasm. We need MORE of this mentality. Lots more. Question regarding material delivery. I’m no physics guy. At all. But I do love cool shit. This definitely counts. But what about the payload? Upon fire, wouldn’t it get compressed/reach a breaking point/liquify/become unidentifiable with enough thrust, pressure, or inertia behind it? I’d assume even a golf ball has a limit considering a hydraulic press can smash it flat. Water would only maintain deliver ability depending upon the strength of the delivery vessel itself I’d surmise. Perhaps I’m missing something regarding the vacuum equilibrium of contents at launch? It does seem as if it would make a hell of a launcher for rockets, mortars, drones, rods of god, etc for increased speed & distance for kinetic projectiles though. Again, I am even < physics novice so forgive my lack of accurate terminology. Amazing work though.

Фото профиля Escalating Entropy
Escalating Entropy1 месяц назад

It’s a very complicated potato gun. With lights. This is what happens when you gives country whites too much money 😝

Фото профиля I agree with me
I agree with me1 месяц назад

Your muzzle velocity is all that matters. Once the projectile leaves the barrel it begins to rapidly decelerate. It doesn’t matter how much fuel you mix, it’s all just a wasted expanding flame that comes after the ball. It’s too short. Make the barrel 10x longer for more velocity

Фото профиля Kyle
Kyle1 месяц назад

I just couldn’t see that PVC and ABS contraption supplying the pressures you’re speaking of

Фото профиля warren’s world
warren’s world1 месяц назад

That’s one heck of a tater gun. Wow.

Фото профиля Troy Van Valey
Troy Van Valey1 месяц назад

High altitude research ballon payload launcher. That will get you into space. Your Welcome.

Фото профиля MFK
MFK1 месяц назад

So what the hell you made this video for if you can’t shoot it🤦🏼‍♂️🗡️🔺🪐

Похожие видео