Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Prt 1Why 🇮🇱 were kicked out 1303 times throughout history.debt based slave system usury. 🤓 oblivious modern day slaves

78,007 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Thomas Jefferson was responsible for the largest expansion of slavery in history. After the collapse of the Virginia tobacco industry, Virginia slaveholders turned to slave trading as their primary source of revenue. But Virginia slave prices were being undercut by Carolina rice farmers with slave imports from Africa's rice coast (Sierra Leone). Jefferson pushed for a ban on the importation of slaves from Africa, not out of altruism, but to protect the burgeoning slave trading industry in his home state of Virginia. Jefferson himself was a Virginia slave trader. After the ban on the importation of slaves from Africa went into effect in 1807, Virginia became the primary supplier of slaves for the Carolina rice farms & the deep South cotton fields. This led to an explosion of slave breeding in Virginia. Throughout the course of slavery, Virginia would go on to breed & sell more slaves than any single African slave empire in the Transatlantic slave trade era. For some perspective, the infamous West African Kingdom of Dahomey at its peak in the mid 19th century sold an estimated 10 thousand slaves a year to Europeans. The city of Richmond, Virginia, exceeded that total in a single month, selling 10 thousand slaves a month to the Deep South Jefferson once boasted, "I consider a woman who brings a child every two years as more profitable than the best man of the farm. What she produces is an addition to capital, while his labors disappear in mere consumption." Jefferson also acquired the Louisiana territories from France and oversaw the westward expansion of slavery. According to Jefferson, neglecting to expand slavery would be "an act of suicide on themselves, and of treason against the hopes of the world."

Great House

762,621 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Can Christians legitimately reinterpret biblical prohibitions based on a distinction between contemporary and ancient forms of a prohibited practice? When it comes to same-sex relationships, many instinctively say no. But in fact, Christians have done so in the past on the issue of usury. Although usury today has broadly been redefined to mean charging excessive interest on loans, in the Bible and throughout most of church history, it meant charging any interest at all on a loan. Condemned categorically in Psalm 15:5 and as an "abomination" warranting the death penalty in Ezekiel 18:13, church fathers declared usury a sin against nature that jeopardized the eternal salvation of anyone who practiced it. The medieval church went so far as to declare that any Christian who even doubted the inherent sinfulness of usury should be "punished as a heretic." But in the 16th century, John Calvin argued for a reinterpretation of the biblical prohibitions of interest. Their original purpose, he said, had been to prevent the rich from exploiting the poor. But in the commercial economies of his day, lending at moderate interest to the wealthy could advance the common good. Calvin agreed that the Bible's broad prohibition of usury had been "apt" in the ancient world. But, he said, "our situation is quite different. For that reason, I am unwilling to condemn it, so long as it is practiced with equity and charity." Today, while Christians rightly continue to oppose exploitative forms of interest, hardly any Christians condemn interest outright. No denominations are splintering over it, nor are people being accused of heresy because of it. Calvin's hermeneutic is not new, nor is it inherently controversial. The question is simply whether we are willing to apply his basic interpretive principle to the topic of same-sex relationships given the vast cultural differences that exist between ancient same-sex practices and modern same-sex marriages. As I argue in this recent talk about the parallels between usury and same-sex relationships, we have a strong case for doing so.

Matthew Vines

11,208 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Over 1,064,746 election-related files were deleted out of 9,571 directories found on the "D drive" from the EMS in the Maricopa County, Arizona 2020 Election. The EMS, or Election Management System server also contained a "C Drive," with 865 directories, with 85,673 election-related files deleted. Some of the deleted EMS server files were .dvd files, which were the results of the election totals off of each tabulating device, there were also S logs, scanned ballot images, etc. Large amounts of files were also deleted on 3 of Maricopa County's high-capacity scanners. High Pro Scanner 1: 59,387 election data files deleted out of 304 directories. High Pro Scanner 3: 196,463 election data files deleted out of 1,061 directories. Log entries were also found to be overwritten, which is also illegal because of the standard 22-month federal mandate to preserve ALL original records. An individual executed a script, foreign to the EMS, on 2/11/2021, 462 log entries were found overwritten by that same script, which was ran multiple times. on 3/3/2021, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by this same script. On 3/12/2021, the day before the system was handed over for the audit, 330 log entries were overwritten by that same script. An specific EMS admin account was identified as the culprit. This is why assigning a name to each user is important. The person was identified through time stamps from the logins and compared to security footage of the system it was performed on. Charges MUST be brought to all involved. We must purge our election precincts and official positions of bad actors.

The SCIF

30,186 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

The Truth About Eating: Why Three Meals a Day Is a Modern Lie Most people don’t realize it, but the idea of eating three meals a day was not born from nature or tradition. It was engineered—by the Rockefeller Foundation, as part of a broader system designed to reshape how we consume, think, and live. Our ancestors didn’t sit down to breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. For many, eating three times a week was a luxury. The human body is built to thrive in a fasted state. When you sleep, your body heals—not because you’re resting, but because you’re fasting. Without food to digest, your energy is redirected toward repair, regeneration, and recovery. That’s why fasting isn’t just a trend; it’s a biological imperative. When you feel sick, the instinct is often to seek out a doctor in a white coat. But how much do they really know about the body’s innate healing mechanisms? Instead of rushing to a clinic, consider this: a 36-hour fast can activate your stem cells. These cells travel to areas of injury, targeting inflammation and promoting healing from within. The modern food system wants you dependent—on processed meals, on constant snacking, on the illusion that you need to eat all day to survive. Obesity isn’t natural; it’s installed. It’s the result of a system designed to keep you fat, lazy, and reliant on their products. Your body is not broken. It’s meant to fast. It’s meant to heal. And it’s time to reclaim that power.

Camus

79,580 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 SCIENTISTS BROUGHT “DEAD” ANIMALS BACK TO LIFE USING SYNTHETIC BLOOD — AND PEOPLE THINK THEY MAY HAVE JUST CRACKED DEATH A Yale experiment is going viral after scientists revealed they were able to restore activity inside pigs that had been clinically dead for over an hour. No heartbeat. No circulation. No oxygen. The pigs were intentionally placed into cardiac arrest and left dead for a full 60 minutes before researchers connected them to an experimental system called OrganEx, a machine that pumps a synthetic blood-like fluid throughout the body. What happened next has people genuinely disturbed: • hearts began showing electrical activity again • circulation returned throughout the body • organs started functioning • skin color came back • and some of the pigs reportedly made sudden movements during procedures Researchers insist the animals were NOT conscious. But the experiment is now reigniting massive debate online over: • whether death is actually permanent • how long cells remain “alive” after the body shuts down • and whether modern science is getting dangerously close to reversing death itself Now the internet is completely split: • “This sounds like the beginning of a dystopian movie.” • “So what exactly counts as dead now?” • “Science is entering territory humans were never supposed to touch.” • “Imagine what they’re already testing behind closed doors.” If scientists eventually figure out how to reverse death… should humans even be allowed to use it? 📹: popularmechanics

HustleBitch

55,035 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten