Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Public documents request just shattered Gavin Newsom’s entire narrative on the Pacific Palisades fire Official California Wildfire Management Plan obtained “Let it burn” “California has continually said they denied responsibility for any part of the Palisades fire, those orders to let it burn inside a California state parks wildfire...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,374,017 subscribers

121,322 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨NEWSOM L.A. FIRE SMOKING GUN: Gavin Newsom denied any state responsibility. But his own agency's “Wildlife Management Plan” said: “let Topanga State Park burn in a wildfire event.” Jennifer Horn has the story of a newly unearthed document linking Gavin to the Palisades fire.
1:55

🚨NEWSOM L.A. FIRE SMOKING GUN: Gavin Newsom denied any state responsibility. But his own agency's “Wildlife Management Plan” said: “let Topanga State Park burn in a wildfire event.” Jennifer Horn has the story of a newly unearthed document linking Gavin to the Palisades fire.

steve hilton

53,738 views • 8 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 CALIFORNIA CALLS DEADLY PALISADES LAWSUIT 'BASELESS' Thousands of fire victims are suing the state of California, saying it let a smoldering hillside sit unmonitored for days, until it reignited and wiped out Pacific Palisades in January. Attorneys say the state knew about the fire risk, had protocols to inspect, owned the land, and still did absolutely nothing. Newsom’s response? “The State didn’t start this fire... and the State wasn’t responsible for responding to or monitoring this fire.” Funny how California can shut down entire water systems to “save the smelt,” but can’t be bothered to check if a hillside is still on fire. Source: L.A. Times, RedWave Press
2:52

🚨🇺🇸 CALIFORNIA CALLS DEADLY PALISADES LAWSUIT 'BASELESS' Thousands of fire victims are suing the state of California, saying it let a smoldering hillside sit unmonitored for days, until it reignited and wiped out Pacific Palisades in January. Attorneys say the state knew about the fire risk, had protocols to inspect, owned the land, and still did absolutely nothing. Newsom’s response? “The State didn’t start this fire... and the State wasn’t responsible for responding to or monitoring this fire.” Funny how California can shut down entire water systems to “save the smelt,” but can’t be bothered to check if a hillside is still on fire. Source: L.A. Times, RedWave Press

Mario Nawfal

56,970 views • 9 months ago

Pacific Palisades victim says the California Fair Plan was the only homeowners insurance she could get Get this She was kicked off the plan just 5 MONTHS before the Pacific Palisades Fire What are the odds?!? This happened to many more residents Land grab
1:54

Pacific Palisades victim says the California Fair Plan was the only homeowners insurance she could get Get this She was kicked off the plan just 5 MONTHS before the Pacific Palisades Fire What are the odds?!? This happened to many more residents Land grab

Wall Street Apes

92,474 views • 6 months ago

The fire has "jumped the 101": Capt. Sheila Kelliher of the Los Angeles County Fire Department has new information on the fast-moving and dangerous Pacific Palisades wildfire.
2:52

The fire has "jumped the 101": Capt. Sheila Kelliher of the Los Angeles County Fire Department has new information on the fast-moving and dangerous Pacific Palisades wildfire.

Anderson Cooper 360°

41,977 views • 1 year ago

Breaking: Spencer Pratt announcing he is running for Mayor of Los Angeles on the one year anniversary of the Pacific Palisades fire after Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass let them burn! Hold these Democrat traitors accountable and take California back! Real America's Voice (RAV)
1:01

Breaking: Spencer Pratt announcing he is running for Mayor of Los Angeles on the one year anniversary of the Pacific Palisades fire after Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass let them burn! Hold these Democrat traitors accountable and take California back! Real America's Voice (RAV)

Ben Bergquam - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) News

509,760 views • 7 months ago

'Firenadoes' were spotted in the Pacific Palisades fires. Intense heat and high winds created these rare fire tornadoes Friday night as the blaze spread through Pacific Palisades, California.
0:38

'Firenadoes' were spotted in the Pacific Palisades fires. Intense heat and high winds created these rare fire tornadoes Friday night as the blaze spread through Pacific Palisades, California.

AccuWeather

141,507 views • 1 year ago

Major Insurers Canceled Californians' Fire Insurance Policies Months Before Palisades Wildfires State Farm, one of California's biggest insurers, just months ago canceled hundreds of homeowners' policies Pacific Palisades, an area now being ravaged by devastating wildfires. State Farm, one of California’s largest insurers, canceled 72,000 homeowners' policies statewide in 2024, including 1,600 in Pacific Palisades, citing financial instability due to rising wildfire risks. CEO Denise Hardin defended the move as necessary to avoid "financial failure" despite its impact on policyholders. The decision was part of a broader insurance crisis in California, where private insurers have scaled back coverage in fire-prone areas. As a result, the state’s FAIR Plan, a last-resort insurance provider, has seen its policies more than double since 2020. Southern California is battling three major wildfires—Palisades, Eaton, and Hurst—propelled by nearly 100 mph winds. The Palisades Fire has already scorched 2,900 acres in Pacific Palisades, while the Eaton Fire near Pasadena has burned 1,000 acres, and the Hurst Fire in San Fernando has affected 500 acres. Below is a list of locations where California homeowners had their fire insurance policies canceled in recent months:
0:20

Major Insurers Canceled Californians' Fire Insurance Policies Months Before Palisades Wildfires State Farm, one of California's biggest insurers, just months ago canceled hundreds of homeowners' policies Pacific Palisades, an area now being ravaged by devastating wildfires. State Farm, one of California’s largest insurers, canceled 72,000 homeowners' policies statewide in 2024, including 1,600 in Pacific Palisades, citing financial instability due to rising wildfire risks. CEO Denise Hardin defended the move as necessary to avoid "financial failure" despite its impact on policyholders. The decision was part of a broader insurance crisis in California, where private insurers have scaled back coverage in fire-prone areas. As a result, the state’s FAIR Plan, a last-resort insurance provider, has seen its policies more than double since 2020. Southern California is battling three major wildfires—Palisades, Eaton, and Hurst—propelled by nearly 100 mph winds. The Palisades Fire has already scorched 2,900 acres in Pacific Palisades, while the Eaton Fire near Pasadena has burned 1,000 acres, and the Hurst Fire in San Fernando has affected 500 acres. Below is a list of locations where California homeowners had their fire insurance policies canceled in recent months:

Kyle Becker

278,623 views • 1 year ago

It’s happening: The Hills actor Spencer Pratt has filed a lawsuit against California and the city of Los Angeles There is evidence showing the Pacific Palisades fire was not a new fire, it was a rekindling of a fire from days early that wasn’t fully out out. Gavin Newsom didn’t follow wildfire procedures to ensure the fire was out, which should make him and city leaders CRIMINALLY liable “Allegedly the failures of the City of Los Angeles were monumental and were directly responsible for the destruction of thousands of homes and loss of life in the Palisades fire.”
1:49

It’s happening: The Hills actor Spencer Pratt has filed a lawsuit against California and the city of Los Angeles There is evidence showing the Pacific Palisades fire was not a new fire, it was a rekindling of a fire from days early that wasn’t fully out out. Gavin Newsom didn’t follow wildfire procedures to ensure the fire was out, which should make him and city leaders CRIMINALLY liable “Allegedly the failures of the City of Los Angeles were monumental and were directly responsible for the destruction of thousands of homes and loss of life in the Palisades fire.”

Wall Street Apes

960,736 views • 1 year ago

🚨EXCLUSVE: State of California Conceals Incriminating Text Messages About Cause of Deadly Palisades Fire, Despite Court Orders The State of California was ORDERED to turn over all text messages back in December but withheld key text messages from Palisades victims until now, after depositions of State Parks employees were completed. The newly ‘discovered’ texts are damning, and more evidence of a massive cover up by the State of California. One text confirms that a State Parks employee saw “smoke and smoldering roots” on January 2, but didn’t report it. A second text shows a State Park employee saw the Lachman burn scar smoking just FOUR HOURS before Palisades Fire started on January 7 — “Wow the burn scar is doing its best dust bowl impression. Be safe out there” — but State Parks didn’t do a thing. 12 people died and 7,000 homes were destroyed in the Palisades fire.
4:44

🚨EXCLUSVE: State of California Conceals Incriminating Text Messages About Cause of Deadly Palisades Fire, Despite Court Orders The State of California was ORDERED to turn over all text messages back in December but withheld key text messages from Palisades victims until now, after depositions of State Parks employees were completed. The newly ‘discovered’ texts are damning, and more evidence of a massive cover up by the State of California. One text confirms that a State Parks employee saw “smoke and smoldering roots” on January 2, but didn’t report it. A second text shows a State Park employee saw the Lachman burn scar smoking just FOUR HOURS before Palisades Fire started on January 7 — “Wow the burn scar is doing its best dust bowl impression. Be safe out there” — but State Parks didn’t do a thing. 12 people died and 7,000 homes were destroyed in the Palisades fire.

Rich McHugh

57,389 views • 3 months ago

A man has been arrested on federal charges of intentionally igniting the fire that led to the destructive Palisades Fire in California
1:21

A man has been arrested on federal charges of intentionally igniting the fire that led to the destructive Palisades Fire in California

Reuters

46,322 views • 10 months ago

Newly obtained state documents are raising fresh questions about how California officials responded to the Palisades Fire. They point to parts of the state’s land-management approach that may have inadvertently contributed to the third-most destructive wildfire in California history. NewsNation’s Rich McHugh has the exclusive details. MORE:
4:25

Newly obtained state documents are raising fresh questions about how California officials responded to the Palisades Fire. They point to parts of the state’s land-management approach that may have inadvertently contributed to the third-most destructive wildfire in California history. NewsNation’s Rich McHugh has the exclusive details. MORE:

NewsNation

69,304 views • 8 months ago

New documents obtained by NewsNation prove Gavin Newsom is lying about the Pacific Palisades fire in court “Did they lie about it in court, lie about all of it in court? These new documents that we've obtained suggest that's absolutely what happened” Newsom needs to go in Prison - Gavin Newsom’s Court Claims: In response to a lawsuit from over 3,000 Palisades residents alleging failure to monitor embers, Governor Newsom’s office denied state responsibility, claiming the fire was arson-related and that the state had no notice or duty to respond/monitor. - New Contradictory Evidence from LAFD Records: Los Angeles Fire Department incident reports reveal the LAFD notified the state just after midnight on January 1; the state sent a park representative at 1:46 AM, who arrived on scene by 4:00 AM. - California was heavily involved on the scene: A state park representative was present near the burn scar, ordering firefighters on where they could and could not go (e.g., prohibiting bulldozing on January 2). Another representative arrived the next day. - Documents show California mismanaged the fire and now Gavin Newsom is outright lying about it and covering up the evidence in court
3:35

New documents obtained by NewsNation prove Gavin Newsom is lying about the Pacific Palisades fire in court “Did they lie about it in court, lie about all of it in court? These new documents that we've obtained suggest that's absolutely what happened” Newsom needs to go in Prison - Gavin Newsom’s Court Claims: In response to a lawsuit from over 3,000 Palisades residents alleging failure to monitor embers, Governor Newsom’s office denied state responsibility, claiming the fire was arson-related and that the state had no notice or duty to respond/monitor. - New Contradictory Evidence from LAFD Records: Los Angeles Fire Department incident reports reveal the LAFD notified the state just after midnight on January 1; the state sent a park representative at 1:46 AM, who arrived on scene by 4:00 AM. - California was heavily involved on the scene: A state park representative was present near the burn scar, ordering firefighters on where they could and could not go (e.g., prohibiting bulldozing on January 2). Another representative arrived the next day. - Documents show California mismanaged the fire and now Gavin Newsom is outright lying about it and covering up the evidence in court

Wall Street Apes

35,343 views • 9 months ago

“In event of a wildfire, let it burn” “The state is not responsible for monitoring or responding to this fire” A lot of conflicting messages coming out of Gavin Newsom‘s office when it comes to the Palisades wildfire. One thing is certain, Gavin Newsom is blaming anyone and everyone except Gavin Newsom.
3:24

“In event of a wildfire, let it burn” “The state is not responsible for monitoring or responding to this fire” A lot of conflicting messages coming out of Gavin Newsom‘s office when it comes to the Palisades wildfire. One thing is certain, Gavin Newsom is blaming anyone and everyone except Gavin Newsom.

Kevin Dalton

31,101 views • 8 months ago

New video obtained of Pacific Palisades fire evidence shows Gavin Newsom and California Democrats have been lying to everyone - Video obtained shows smoldering brush in the Pacific Palisades on January 2, days before the Palisades Fire ignited on January 7. This directly contradicts claims that no one could see embers after the initial Lockman Fire was declared contained on December 31. - Officials described the Palisades Fire as a “holdover fire” burning undetected deep in vegetation. New video and eyewitness accounts prove embers were visible and reported, not hidden - Multiple people reported seeing smoke and called 911 in the days following the Lockman Fire. No fire crews were dispatched to investigate or extinguish the smoldering embers, despite visible smoke rising from the burn scar. - Newsom stated assets were pre-deployed ahead of red flag wind warnings. Cal Fire confirmed no fire trucks or crews were pre-deployed to the Palisades area - The fire rekindled on state-owned land, making California (not LA City or County) responsible for monitoring and maintenance - Callers reporting smoke were allegedly told no action would be taken unless active flames were visible. Jurisdiction confusion did not excuse inaction — smoke reports should have triggered investigation Gavin Newsom is criminally negligent. Lock him up
5:44

New video obtained of Pacific Palisades fire evidence shows Gavin Newsom and California Democrats have been lying to everyone - Video obtained shows smoldering brush in the Pacific Palisades on January 2, days before the Palisades Fire ignited on January 7. This directly contradicts claims that no one could see embers after the initial Lockman Fire was declared contained on December 31. - Officials described the Palisades Fire as a “holdover fire” burning undetected deep in vegetation. New video and eyewitness accounts prove embers were visible and reported, not hidden - Multiple people reported seeing smoke and called 911 in the days following the Lockman Fire. No fire crews were dispatched to investigate or extinguish the smoldering embers, despite visible smoke rising from the burn scar. - Newsom stated assets were pre-deployed ahead of red flag wind warnings. Cal Fire confirmed no fire trucks or crews were pre-deployed to the Palisades area - The fire rekindled on state-owned land, making California (not LA City or County) responsible for monitoring and maintenance - Callers reporting smoke were allegedly told no action would be taken unless active flames were visible. Jurisdiction confusion did not excuse inaction — smoke reports should have triggered investigation Gavin Newsom is criminally negligent. Lock him up

Wall Street Apes

117,905 views • 9 months ago