Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

PUBLIC RELEASE: Constitutional Correspondence (dated 18 November 2025) Today, Ethical Approach UK, jointly with Mark Sexton (M.Sexton), has placed into the public domain the full Constitutional Correspondence dated 18 November 2025, issued to: • the Lady Chief Justice • the Secretary of State for Justice • the Attorney General...

391,299 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨EXPLOSIVE: THE DAY OF RECKONING HAS BEGUN — THE EVIDENCE THEY SWORE WOULD NEVER SEE LIGHT IS NOW PUBLIC This morning, retired police constable Mark Sexton released Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. What’s now public is explosive — and it proves what millions suspected: There was a UK-wide order to block vaccine-related criminal complaints. And the proof comes not from whistleblowers or speculation… …but from police-authored documents, FOI responses, and recorded interactions. Here’s what Phase 1 confirms: • Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive ordered officers NOT to accept or record covid-vaccine crime allegations. • NPCC communications show the same blanket policy was mirrored across the UK. • Frontline officers were prevented from taking evidence — on camera, in multiple stations. • Crime reference 6029679/21 WAS real, active and resourced, until it was suddenly shut down with no lawful basis. • Judges made rulings without being given the full picture — because police failed to disclose the national ban on recording vaccine-related allegations. Every major institution involved — police, Parliament, judiciary — is now implicated in withholding or concealing material facts from the public. And this is only Phase 1. Sexton confirms: More phases are coming More documents will be released Thousands of additional files exist beyond what was included today Every claim in the 18 Nov correspondence is backed by verifiable evidence For years, people were smeared as “conspiracy theorists” for saying this happened. Today, the police’s own documents prove it did. This will have national consequences. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency — that’s the standard this release sets. Share widely. The public deserves the truth. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton

Jim Ferguson

521,062 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Evidence Release: Phase 1 Today, we release Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. This supplemental file demonstrates, by the provision of police-authored material, that: • A UK-wide blanket instruction existed to block the recording and investigation of vaccine-related criminal allegations, confirmed by Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive and corroborated by NPCC internal communications. • Frontline officers were prevented from accepting evidence, as shown in recorded public interactions and contemporaneous operational materials. • CRN 6029679/21 was never “without foundation” - a still-active evidence portal, hundreds of submitted statements and multiple police assurances confirm that a functioning investigation existed before it was subsequently shut down. • Judicial findings were made without key material facts, because police did not disclose the full investigative footprint, relevant national guidance or the provenance of the nationwide rejection policy. This evidence fully supports and substantiates every assertion made in the 18 November correspondence. Importantly, this is only Phase 1. Further releases will follow, each addressing additional strands of the evidential picture. We remain grateful for the extraordinary public support shown so far. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency will continue to guide every step. PDF download Evidence Release: Phase 1 The video presentation by M.Sexton, which accompanies this post, can also be seen on YouTube, using the following link: Please take the time to read and share this evidential material, so that everyone has the opportunity to understand what has taken place and what continues to take place.

ETHICAL APPROACH UK

351,867 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Two cases which were brought before the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe challenging Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CAB 3) have been struck off, NOT dismissed. CAB 3, which seeks, among other things, to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office and change the method of electing a president from direct election by citizens to election by Parliament, requires two referendums in law, but the ZANUPF faction sponsoring it wants to avoid a referendum. The Constitutional Court struck both cases off the roll this morning. It is important to understand that the cases were not dismissed on their merits. Rather, the Court held that the issues raised could not originate and be determined solely by the Constitutional Court and should first be ventilated in another forum, High Court. Professor Lovemore Maduku, who is arguing the cases, has indicated that they will now proceed to the High Court. Should the applicants fail to obtain the relief they seek there, the matters will inevitably return to the Constitutional Court on appeal. Many lawyers have described the Constitutional Court’s decision as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court has declined to confront what has become a highly contentious constitutional question, preferring instead to defer consideration of the substantive issues. A central argument in the war veterans’ challenge, led by Professor Madhuku, is that Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 was discussed and approved by Cabinet, which included President Mnangagwa, the two Vice Presidents, and Cabinet ministers. Professor Madhuku argues that because President Mnangagwa stands to benefit directly from provisions extending his term of office, he should not have participated in deliberations on the amendments. According to the argument, the Constitution prohibits public officials from participating in decisions in which they have a direct personal interest. However, the Constitutional Court did not determine the merits of that argument, ruling instead that the matter should be heard elsewhere first. The legal battle is therefore far from over. It now moves to the High Court and, whatever the outcome there, is likely to find its way back to the Constitutional Court for a final determination.

Hopewell Chin’ono

28,681 просмотров • 3 дней назад

🚨THE COVERUP IS COLLAPSING — AND THE SILENCE IS NOW DEAFENING Mark Sexton has just delivered one of the most explosive updates in modern British history — and he’s right to call out the influencers, journalists and media outlets who are STILL pretending this isn’t happening. Because the latest evidence is not speculation. Not theory. Not “online noise.” It is police-authored material, FOI responses, internal directives, operational records, and forensic documents — and it paints a picture so staggering that the silence around it is becoming a scandal in itself. Here’s what the public has now learned: • 5,000–10,000 crime reports rejected across the UK in just three months (Dec 2021–Mar 2022) Victims and witnesses were turned away by instruction. Crimes simply erased. • Police created a parallel system to block vaccine-related allegations Scotland’s “Speirs Directive.” NPCC internal messages. Operation Teller. This wasn’t incompetence — it was policy. • 15,000+ Yellow Card reports ignored Filed away, never acted on, never investigated. • 100,000+ pages of autopsy data suppressed Including 2,500 cases showing spike protein persistence years after vaccination, and excess mortality data up to 20% higher in the vaccinated population. • Evidence of undeclared contaminants Graphene structures documented across 26 global studies — and the UK authorities knew. • Certificates amended to attribute deaths to Covid Even when forensic evidence showed otherwise. This is not small. This is not niche. This is not a “community story.” This is the largest public-health, policing and regulatory scandal in a century — and Mark Sexton is absolutely right: WHERE ARE THE BIG VOICES? WHERE ARE THE MILLION-FOLLOWER ACCOUNTS? WHERE IS THE UK MEDIA? The silence speaks louder than any headline. Mass deaths. State cover-up. Police complicity. Regulators involved. Judiciary informed. Parliament aware. And still, most of Britain’s journalism class would rather talk about the Budget. For anyone still pretending this doesn’t matter: This is not “online drama.” This is a crime scene. A national emergency. A historical reckoning. And thanks to people like Mark Sexton, Ian Clayton, and every whistleblower coming forward — the truth is breaking through whether the “big hitters” like it or not. The silence is over. The evidence is here. And the British public will not be gaslit into looking away. I’ll amplify this. So should you. More phases are coming. And when the full truth detonates, the ones who stayed silent will be remembered just as clearly as the ones who stood up. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton

Jim Ferguson

177,817 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад