Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

PUBLIC RELEASE: Constitutional Correspondence (dated 18 November 2025) Today, Ethical Approach UK, jointly with Mark Sexton (M.Sexton), has placed into the public domain the full Constitutional Correspondence dated 18 November 2025, issued to: • the Lady Chief Justice • the Secretary of State for Justice • the Attorney General...

EthicalApproach's profile picture

ETHICAL APPROACH UK

31,106 subscribers

391,626 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨EXPLOSIVE: THE DAY OF RECKONING HAS BEGUN — THE EVIDENCE THEY SWORE WOULD NEVER SEE LIGHT IS NOW PUBLIC This morning, retired police constable Mark Sexton released Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. What’s now public is explosive — and it proves what millions suspected: There was a UK-wide order to block vaccine-related criminal complaints. And the proof comes not from whistleblowers or speculation… …but from police-authored documents, FOI responses, and recorded interactions. Here’s what Phase 1 confirms: • Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive ordered officers NOT to accept or record covid-vaccine crime allegations. • NPCC communications show the same blanket policy was mirrored across the UK. • Frontline officers were prevented from taking evidence — on camera, in multiple stations. • Crime reference 6029679/21 WAS real, active and resourced, until it was suddenly shut down with no lawful basis. • Judges made rulings without being given the full picture — because police failed to disclose the national ban on recording vaccine-related allegations. Every major institution involved — police, Parliament, judiciary — is now implicated in withholding or concealing material facts from the public. And this is only Phase 1. Sexton confirms: More phases are coming More documents will be released Thousands of additional files exist beyond what was included today Every claim in the 18 Nov correspondence is backed by verifiable evidence For years, people were smeared as “conspiracy theorists” for saying this happened. Today, the police’s own documents prove it did. This will have national consequences. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency — that’s the standard this release sets. Share widely. The public deserves the truth. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton
6:49

🚨EXPLOSIVE: THE DAY OF RECKONING HAS BEGUN — THE EVIDENCE THEY SWORE WOULD NEVER SEE LIGHT IS NOW PUBLIC This morning, retired police constable Mark Sexton released Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. What’s now public is explosive — and it proves what millions suspected: There was a UK-wide order to block vaccine-related criminal complaints. And the proof comes not from whistleblowers or speculation… …but from police-authored documents, FOI responses, and recorded interactions. Here’s what Phase 1 confirms: • Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive ordered officers NOT to accept or record covid-vaccine crime allegations. • NPCC communications show the same blanket policy was mirrored across the UK. • Frontline officers were prevented from taking evidence — on camera, in multiple stations. • Crime reference 6029679/21 WAS real, active and resourced, until it was suddenly shut down with no lawful basis. • Judges made rulings without being given the full picture — because police failed to disclose the national ban on recording vaccine-related allegations. Every major institution involved — police, Parliament, judiciary — is now implicated in withholding or concealing material facts from the public. And this is only Phase 1. Sexton confirms: More phases are coming More documents will be released Thousands of additional files exist beyond what was included today Every claim in the 18 Nov correspondence is backed by verifiable evidence For years, people were smeared as “conspiracy theorists” for saying this happened. Today, the police’s own documents prove it did. This will have national consequences. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency — that’s the standard this release sets. Share widely. The public deserves the truth. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton

Jim Ferguson

521,289 views • 8 months ago

Evidence Release: Phase 1 Today, we release Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. This supplemental file demonstrates, by the provision of police-authored material, that: • A UK-wide blanket instruction existed to block the recording and investigation of vaccine-related criminal allegations, confirmed by Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive and corroborated by NPCC internal communications. • Frontline officers were prevented from accepting evidence, as shown in recorded public interactions and contemporaneous operational materials. • CRN 6029679/21 was never “without foundation” - a still-active evidence portal, hundreds of submitted statements and multiple police assurances confirm that a functioning investigation existed before it was subsequently shut down. • Judicial findings were made without key material facts, because police did not disclose the full investigative footprint, relevant national guidance or the provenance of the nationwide rejection policy. This evidence fully supports and substantiates every assertion made in the 18 November correspondence. Importantly, this is only Phase 1. Further releases will follow, each addressing additional strands of the evidential picture. We remain grateful for the extraordinary public support shown so far. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency will continue to guide every step. PDF download Evidence Release: Phase 1 The video presentation by M.Sexton, which accompanies this post, can also be seen on YouTube, using the following link: Please take the time to read and share this evidential material, so that everyone has the opportunity to understand what has taken place and what continues to take place.
6:49

Evidence Release: Phase 1 Today, we release Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. This supplemental file demonstrates, by the provision of police-authored material, that: • A UK-wide blanket instruction existed to block the recording and investigation of vaccine-related criminal allegations, confirmed by Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive and corroborated by NPCC internal communications. • Frontline officers were prevented from accepting evidence, as shown in recorded public interactions and contemporaneous operational materials. • CRN 6029679/21 was never “without foundation” - a still-active evidence portal, hundreds of submitted statements and multiple police assurances confirm that a functioning investigation existed before it was subsequently shut down. • Judicial findings were made without key material facts, because police did not disclose the full investigative footprint, relevant national guidance or the provenance of the nationwide rejection policy. This evidence fully supports and substantiates every assertion made in the 18 November correspondence. Importantly, this is only Phase 1. Further releases will follow, each addressing additional strands of the evidential picture. We remain grateful for the extraordinary public support shown so far. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency will continue to guide every step. PDF download Evidence Release: Phase 1 The video presentation by M.Sexton, which accompanies this post, can also be seen on YouTube, using the following link: Please take the time to read and share this evidential material, so that everyone has the opportunity to understand what has taken place and what continues to take place.

ETHICAL APPROACH UK

352,351 views • 8 months ago

Monday 5th of January 2026 Open correspondence sent to President Donald Trump, from Mark Sexton and myself, which is self explanatory. Short video attached below explaining our reasons for contacting President Trump. You can view and download the correspondence via this link: If anyone else wants to send the letter to The White House via email, copy and paste the link to the letter into the comments section on the White House contact page. You can add your own thoughts and concerns there too if you wish to do so. Here is a link to the relevant White House contact page: Please share far and wide. Thank you from both Mark and I.
5:43

Monday 5th of January 2026 Open correspondence sent to President Donald Trump, from Mark Sexton and myself, which is self explanatory. Short video attached below explaining our reasons for contacting President Trump. You can view and download the correspondence via this link: If anyone else wants to send the letter to The White House via email, copy and paste the link to the letter into the comments section on the White House contact page. You can add your own thoughts and concerns there too if you wish to do so. Here is a link to the relevant White House contact page: Please share far and wide. Thank you from both Mark and I.

ETHICAL APPROACH UK

85,085 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | NPP (National People's Party) withdraws its support to the Manipur Government with immediate effect. In Delhi, NPP MLA & National Secretary (Political Affairs) Sheikh Noorul Hassan says, "In the letter issued by national president Conrad K Sangma, he has mentioned and it is known fact that because of the failure of the present CM N Biren Singh and his Govt in bringing peace and normalcy in the state, the law and order is completely messed up in Manipur... There is no law and order, no normalcy, there is no roadmap ahead to bring peace and normalcy in Manipur. This unfortunate violence and conflict that is taking place for the last 18n months has completely eroded the confidence of general public today in the street...We are also under scrutiny of the general public, what are we doing as we were supporting the BJP-led Govt from outside without condition. But the present Govt failed to bring back normalcy and peace in the state so finally the national president has taken the step in this regard...NPP will go with the general public, the wishes of the general public...NPP is part of NDA. We have withdrawn from Manipur on the demand and seeing the prevailing law & order situation and the wishes of general public. We have not withdrawn on our own will..."
4:45

#WATCH | NPP (National People's Party) withdraws its support to the Manipur Government with immediate effect. In Delhi, NPP MLA & National Secretary (Political Affairs) Sheikh Noorul Hassan says, "In the letter issued by national president Conrad K Sangma, he has mentioned and it is known fact that because of the failure of the present CM N Biren Singh and his Govt in bringing peace and normalcy in the state, the law and order is completely messed up in Manipur... There is no law and order, no normalcy, there is no roadmap ahead to bring peace and normalcy in Manipur. This unfortunate violence and conflict that is taking place for the last 18n months has completely eroded the confidence of general public today in the street...We are also under scrutiny of the general public, what are we doing as we were supporting the BJP-led Govt from outside without condition. But the present Govt failed to bring back normalcy and peace in the state so finally the national president has taken the step in this regard...NPP will go with the general public, the wishes of the general public...NPP is part of NDA. We have withdrawn from Manipur on the demand and seeing the prevailing law & order situation and the wishes of general public. We have not withdrawn on our own will..."

ANI

24,481 views • 1 year ago

In the second matter before the Constitutional Court, filed by former opposition Member of Parliament Prince Dubeko Sibanda, the argument was that Parliament could not lawfully debate Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 because the bill itself is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court ruled that the application was not yet ripe for determination, meaning that the parliamentary process must first run its course before the applicant can return to court to challenge the outcome. Once again, many lawyers have described the Court’s approach as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court is declining to engage with the substantive constitutional questions now and is instead postponing their determination. However, the issues will not disappear. Even if the matter proceeds through the High Court first, it is almost inevitable that it will eventually return to the Constitutional Court on appeal for a final determination on the merits. In short, the Constitutional Court has not resolved the constitutional questions surrounding CAB 3; it has merely deferred them.
1:48

In the second matter before the Constitutional Court, filed by former opposition Member of Parliament Prince Dubeko Sibanda, the argument was that Parliament could not lawfully debate Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 because the bill itself is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court ruled that the application was not yet ripe for determination, meaning that the parliamentary process must first run its course before the applicant can return to court to challenge the outcome. Once again, many lawyers have described the Court’s approach as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court is declining to engage with the substantive constitutional questions now and is instead postponing their determination. However, the issues will not disappear. Even if the matter proceeds through the High Court first, it is almost inevitable that it will eventually return to the Constitutional Court on appeal for a final determination on the merits. In short, the Constitutional Court has not resolved the constitutional questions surrounding CAB 3; it has merely deferred them.

Hopewell Chin’ono

39,069 views • 1 month ago

In my pursuit of justice and commitment to accountability and good governance, I have filed Constitutional Petition HCCHRPET/E053/2025 in the High Court of Mombasa. The petition challenges the County Government’s irregular procurement of the KSh 17 Billion Waste Management Project, after exhausting all avenues to obtain disclosure on how the tender was approved without County Assembly approval. There is no evidence of tender advertisement, no public participation, and no Environmental Impact Assessment. The County Government’s refusal to release procurement documents violates Article 35 of the Constitution and the Access to Information Act. The petition seeks to: 1. Nullify all irregular tenders 2. Secure full disclosure of all documents 3. Invite investigations by EACC and PPRA 4. Obtain court orders to ensure future projects follow the law and proper public participation processes. This petition is a firm stand against opacity and misuse of public resources. I remain committed to protecting citizens’ rights and ensuring our institutions uphold the transparency and accountability required by the Constitution.
1:38

In my pursuit of justice and commitment to accountability and good governance, I have filed Constitutional Petition HCCHRPET/E053/2025 in the High Court of Mombasa. The petition challenges the County Government’s irregular procurement of the KSh 17 Billion Waste Management Project, after exhausting all avenues to obtain disclosure on how the tender was approved without County Assembly approval. There is no evidence of tender advertisement, no public participation, and no Environmental Impact Assessment. The County Government’s refusal to release procurement documents violates Article 35 of the Constitution and the Access to Information Act. The petition seeks to: 1. Nullify all irregular tenders 2. Secure full disclosure of all documents 3. Invite investigations by EACC and PPRA 4. Obtain court orders to ensure future projects follow the law and proper public participation processes. This petition is a firm stand against opacity and misuse of public resources. I remain committed to protecting citizens’ rights and ensuring our institutions uphold the transparency and accountability required by the Constitution.

Mohammed Ali, CBS, HSC

21,069 views • 8 months ago

As Zimbabwe approaches a critical stage in the consideration of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, the Convener of the Constitution Defenders Forum, TENDAI BITI, presents a detailed analysis of the Bill, its constitutional implications, and the dangers it poses to democratic governance, constitutionalism, and the sovereignty of the people. At this crucial juncture, as Parliament prepares to deliberate on this far-reaching constitutional amendment, we encourage all citizens to engage with the issues, understand what is at stake, and participate in the defence of the Constitution. Watch the full video here: #RejectAmendmentNo3 #DefendTheConstitution
2:23

As Zimbabwe approaches a critical stage in the consideration of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, the Convener of the Constitution Defenders Forum, TENDAI BITI, presents a detailed analysis of the Bill, its constitutional implications, and the dangers it poses to democratic governance, constitutionalism, and the sovereignty of the people. At this crucial juncture, as Parliament prepares to deliberate on this far-reaching constitutional amendment, we encourage all citizens to engage with the issues, understand what is at stake, and participate in the defence of the Constitution. Watch the full video here: #RejectAmendmentNo3 #DefendTheConstitution

Constitution Defenders Forum

15,189 views • 2 months ago

🚨🚨Monday 6th of April 2026. A shocking discovery regarding all Police Chief Constables and other senior officers from Guernsey, Jersey, Isle of Man and Gibraltar. 🚨🚨 Proof of a meeting on the 12th of January 2022 held by the National Police Chiefs Council. This is confirmation they all knew about the Crime reference number 6029679/21 lodged at Hammersmith Police Station in The Metropolitan Police jurisdiction on the 20th of December 2021. Ian Clayton ETHICAL APPROACH UK thank you for uncovering this. Outstanding investigative work. 👏👏👏 The Police betrayed the people and here is their own evidence proving it. Ian’s excellent assessment of this new information and the actual minutes from their meeting is attached here. I explain the importance of this in the 5 minute video. Watch the video, read the report, see for yourself who was at this meeting, was your Chief there? Please share this because the public needs to know what the U.K police have done.
5:56

🚨🚨Monday 6th of April 2026. A shocking discovery regarding all Police Chief Constables and other senior officers from Guernsey, Jersey, Isle of Man and Gibraltar. 🚨🚨 Proof of a meeting on the 12th of January 2022 held by the National Police Chiefs Council. This is confirmation they all knew about the Crime reference number 6029679/21 lodged at Hammersmith Police Station in The Metropolitan Police jurisdiction on the 20th of December 2021. Ian Clayton ETHICAL APPROACH UK thank you for uncovering this. Outstanding investigative work. 👏👏👏 The Police betrayed the people and here is their own evidence proving it. Ian’s excellent assessment of this new information and the actual minutes from their meeting is attached here. I explain the importance of this in the 5 minute video. Watch the video, read the report, see for yourself who was at this meeting, was your Chief there? Please share this because the public needs to know what the U.K police have done.

M.Sexton

225,020 views • 4 months ago

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill
3:20

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

Arshad Madani

70,842 views • 1 year ago

[WATCH] THE SECTION 89 MATTER On the Section 89 matter now before Parliament, so that the public is not misled by those who would dramatise an ordinary constitutional process. The ANC’s posture on the Section 89 Matter is one of procedural neutrality: the process is proceeding in an orderly manner under the binding Constitutional Court judgment, with the Committee’s draft Terms of Reference open for party submissions until Friday 10 July and the work of Parliament continues, it must not be rushed but deliberated carefully. The ANC will participate, if at all, only as amicus curiae, confined to parliamentary process and sequencing, because our duty is to defend the integrity of a constitutional process, not to argue any party’s merits. On the Terms of Reference, the ANC will not support the admissibility of untested hearsay: an inquiry of this gravity demands evidence under oath, properly tested, perjury on those who will think parliament is a playground to mislead or tell plain lies must also be applied. The question before parliament is whether the president committed high crimes and high misdemeanors and did so alive to it, knowingly. That is what parliament is to test but first, is the Panel Report itself a bona fide instrument, did it find correctly that high crimes and high misdemeanors occurred on the part of the president. What we know is that the Public Protector has said no, the SARB has said not so. Then, should parliament proceed now or wait till September court case? We think it is wise and economical to wait because September court gives parliament itself finality and a foundation. That is it. #ANCMediaBriefing #RegisterToVoteANC #YearOfDecisiveAction
5:40

[WATCH] THE SECTION 89 MATTER On the Section 89 matter now before Parliament, so that the public is not misled by those who would dramatise an ordinary constitutional process. The ANC’s posture on the Section 89 Matter is one of procedural neutrality: the process is proceeding in an orderly manner under the binding Constitutional Court judgment, with the Committee’s draft Terms of Reference open for party submissions until Friday 10 July and the work of Parliament continues, it must not be rushed but deliberated carefully. The ANC will participate, if at all, only as amicus curiae, confined to parliamentary process and sequencing, because our duty is to defend the integrity of a constitutional process, not to argue any party’s merits. On the Terms of Reference, the ANC will not support the admissibility of untested hearsay: an inquiry of this gravity demands evidence under oath, properly tested, perjury on those who will think parliament is a playground to mislead or tell plain lies must also be applied. The question before parliament is whether the president committed high crimes and high misdemeanors and did so alive to it, knowingly. That is what parliament is to test but first, is the Panel Report itself a bona fide instrument, did it find correctly that high crimes and high misdemeanors occurred on the part of the president. What we know is that the Public Protector has said no, the SARB has said not so. Then, should parliament proceed now or wait till September court case? We think it is wise and economical to wait because September court gives parliament itself finality and a foundation. That is it. #ANCMediaBriefing #RegisterToVoteANC #YearOfDecisiveAction

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

12,372 views • 1 month ago

🚨 3.5 MILLION EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS RELEASED If true, this is one of the largest evidence disclosures in modern U.S. history. Names appearing repeatedly in travel logs and correspondence demand answers — not spin. The American people don’t want speculation. They want: • Full transparency • No selective redactions • Equal treatment under the law If powerful individuals traveled repeatedly with Epstein, the public deserves clarity on what was known — and when. Accountability cannot depend on status. Sunlight is the only cure.
1:31

🚨 3.5 MILLION EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS RELEASED If true, this is one of the largest evidence disclosures in modern U.S. history. Names appearing repeatedly in travel logs and correspondence demand answers — not spin. The American people don’t want speculation. They want: • Full transparency • No selective redactions • Equal treatment under the law If powerful individuals traveled repeatedly with Epstein, the public deserves clarity on what was known — and when. Accountability cannot depend on status. Sunlight is the only cure.

Jim Ferguson

39,371 views • 5 months ago

The BJP has hit the ground in Kolkata in full support of the Special Intensive Revision and is now standing outside the office of the CEO, West Bengal. We will not allow Mamata Banerjee to trample over democratic institutions or intimidate constitutional authorities. As the incumbent Chief Minister, she is expected to act within the bounds of constitutional propriety—nothing more, nothing less. West Bengal deserves transparency, fairness, and clean electoral rolls, and we will ensure that this process is protected.
1:39

The BJP has hit the ground in Kolkata in full support of the Special Intensive Revision and is now standing outside the office of the CEO, West Bengal. We will not allow Mamata Banerjee to trample over democratic institutions or intimidate constitutional authorities. As the incumbent Chief Minister, she is expected to act within the bounds of constitutional propriety—nothing more, nothing less. West Bengal deserves transparency, fairness, and clean electoral rolls, and we will ensure that this process is protected.

Amit Malviya

63,782 views • 8 months ago

Courts have repeatedly and explicitly upheld the right to film anyone in public places anywhere in the United States under the First Amendment. This woman "in the film industry" is confusing getting a release for private filming for private profit with the constitutional right of recording in public. Bonus: She's demonstrating the Streisand Effect.
1:26

Courts have repeatedly and explicitly upheld the right to film anyone in public places anywhere in the United States under the First Amendment. This woman "in the film industry" is confusing getting a release for private filming for private profit with the constitutional right of recording in public. Bonus: She's demonstrating the Streisand Effect.

Sebastian™

19,857 views • 7 months ago

The NDC withdrew military protection from the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission, a constitutional office holder and public servant and replaced it with police protection. Okay! Today, the president’s son, who holds no public office and has no official business with the state, is being assigned military security funded by the taxpayers money instead of the police. Now imagine if this were Fmr. President Akufo Addo’s daughter, Gyankromah or Edwina. Ghana would be on fire by now. There would be outrage, protests and endless condemnation but because it’s NDC (the saint), we’re expected to stay quiet and pretend this is normal. The hypocrisy among some Ghanaians is loud, embarrassing and absolutely stinks!!! 😷
0:45

The NDC withdrew military protection from the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission, a constitutional office holder and public servant and replaced it with police protection. Okay! Today, the president’s son, who holds no public office and has no official business with the state, is being assigned military security funded by the taxpayers money instead of the police. Now imagine if this were Fmr. President Akufo Addo’s daughter, Gyankromah or Edwina. Ghana would be on fire by now. There would be outrage, protests and endless condemnation but because it’s NDC (the saint), we’re expected to stay quiet and pretend this is normal. The hypocrisy among some Ghanaians is loud, embarrassing and absolutely stinks!!! 😷

CHARLOTTE NICOLE 🕊

26,572 views • 7 months ago

The judge has approved the public release of some evidence involving accused killer Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs during the preliminary hearing in the Charlie Kirk case, and the defense just lost that fight. “The defendant’s objection is overruled.” That is the line everyone needed to hear. Release as much as the law allows, because transparency matters in a case this important. Charlie Kirk’s family deserves to see what was presented, the public deserves to understand what happened, and the courtroom should not become a place where key evidence gets hidden behind procedure while speculation fills the vacuum. Let the facts come out, let the record speak, and let justice move forward in the open.
2:37

The judge has approved the public release of some evidence involving accused killer Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs during the preliminary hearing in the Charlie Kirk case, and the defense just lost that fight. “The defendant’s objection is overruled.” That is the line everyone needed to hear. Release as much as the law allows, because transparency matters in a case this important. Charlie Kirk’s family deserves to see what was presented, the public deserves to understand what happened, and the courtroom should not become a place where key evidence gets hidden behind procedure while speculation fills the vacuum. Let the facts come out, let the record speak, and let justice move forward in the open.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

28,934 views • 28 days ago

Two cases which were brought before the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe challenging Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CAB 3) have been struck off, NOT dismissed. CAB 3, which seeks, among other things, to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office and change the method of electing a president from direct election by citizens to election by Parliament, requires two referendums in law, but the ZANUPF faction sponsoring it wants to avoid a referendum. The Constitutional Court struck both cases off the roll this morning. It is important to understand that the cases were not dismissed on their merits. Rather, the Court held that the issues raised could not originate and be determined solely by the Constitutional Court and should first be ventilated in another forum, High Court. Professor Lovemore Maduku, who is arguing the cases, has indicated that they will now proceed to the High Court. Should the applicants fail to obtain the relief they seek there, the matters will inevitably return to the Constitutional Court on appeal. Many lawyers have described the Constitutional Court’s decision as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court has declined to confront what has become a highly contentious constitutional question, preferring instead to defer consideration of the substantive issues. A central argument in the war veterans’ challenge, led by Professor Madhuku, is that Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 was discussed and approved by Cabinet, which included President Mnangagwa, the two Vice Presidents, and Cabinet ministers. Professor Madhuku argues that because President Mnangagwa stands to benefit directly from provisions extending his term of office, he should not have participated in deliberations on the amendments. According to the argument, the Constitution prohibits public officials from participating in decisions in which they have a direct personal interest. However, the Constitutional Court did not determine the merits of that argument, ruling instead that the matter should be heard elsewhere first. The legal battle is therefore far from over. It now moves to the High Court and, whatever the outcome there, is likely to find its way back to the Constitutional Court for a final determination.
2:15

Two cases which were brought before the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe challenging Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CAB 3) have been struck off, NOT dismissed. CAB 3, which seeks, among other things, to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office and change the method of electing a president from direct election by citizens to election by Parliament, requires two referendums in law, but the ZANUPF faction sponsoring it wants to avoid a referendum. The Constitutional Court struck both cases off the roll this morning. It is important to understand that the cases were not dismissed on their merits. Rather, the Court held that the issues raised could not originate and be determined solely by the Constitutional Court and should first be ventilated in another forum, High Court. Professor Lovemore Maduku, who is arguing the cases, has indicated that they will now proceed to the High Court. Should the applicants fail to obtain the relief they seek there, the matters will inevitably return to the Constitutional Court on appeal. Many lawyers have described the Constitutional Court’s decision as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court has declined to confront what has become a highly contentious constitutional question, preferring instead to defer consideration of the substantive issues. A central argument in the war veterans’ challenge, led by Professor Madhuku, is that Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 was discussed and approved by Cabinet, which included President Mnangagwa, the two Vice Presidents, and Cabinet ministers. Professor Madhuku argues that because President Mnangagwa stands to benefit directly from provisions extending his term of office, he should not have participated in deliberations on the amendments. According to the argument, the Constitution prohibits public officials from participating in decisions in which they have a direct personal interest. However, the Constitutional Court did not determine the merits of that argument, ruling instead that the matter should be heard elsewhere first. The legal battle is therefore far from over. It now moves to the High Court and, whatever the outcome there, is likely to find its way back to the Constitutional Court for a final determination.

Hopewell Chin’ono

29,749 views • 1 month ago

🚨THE COVERUP IS COLLAPSING — AND THE SILENCE IS NOW DEAFENING Mark Sexton has just delivered one of the most explosive updates in modern British history — and he’s right to call out the influencers, journalists and media outlets who are STILL pretending this isn’t happening. Because the latest evidence is not speculation. Not theory. Not “online noise.” It is police-authored material, FOI responses, internal directives, operational records, and forensic documents — and it paints a picture so staggering that the silence around it is becoming a scandal in itself. Here’s what the public has now learned: • 5,000–10,000 crime reports rejected across the UK in just three months (Dec 2021–Mar 2022) Victims and witnesses were turned away by instruction. Crimes simply erased. • Police created a parallel system to block vaccine-related allegations Scotland’s “Speirs Directive.” NPCC internal messages. Operation Teller. This wasn’t incompetence — it was policy. • 15,000+ Yellow Card reports ignored Filed away, never acted on, never investigated. • 100,000+ pages of autopsy data suppressed Including 2,500 cases showing spike protein persistence years after vaccination, and excess mortality data up to 20% higher in the vaccinated population. • Evidence of undeclared contaminants Graphene structures documented across 26 global studies — and the UK authorities knew. • Certificates amended to attribute deaths to Covid Even when forensic evidence showed otherwise. This is not small. This is not niche. This is not a “community story.” This is the largest public-health, policing and regulatory scandal in a century — and Mark Sexton is absolutely right: WHERE ARE THE BIG VOICES? WHERE ARE THE MILLION-FOLLOWER ACCOUNTS? WHERE IS THE UK MEDIA? The silence speaks louder than any headline. Mass deaths. State cover-up. Police complicity. Regulators involved. Judiciary informed. Parliament aware. And still, most of Britain’s journalism class would rather talk about the Budget. For anyone still pretending this doesn’t matter: This is not “online drama.” This is a crime scene. A national emergency. A historical reckoning. And thanks to people like Mark Sexton, Ian Clayton, and every whistleblower coming forward — the truth is breaking through whether the “big hitters” like it or not. The silence is over. The evidence is here. And the British public will not be gaslit into looking away. I’ll amplify this. So should you. More phases are coming. And when the full truth detonates, the ones who stayed silent will be remembered just as clearly as the ones who stood up. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton
6:00

🚨THE COVERUP IS COLLAPSING — AND THE SILENCE IS NOW DEAFENING Mark Sexton has just delivered one of the most explosive updates in modern British history — and he’s right to call out the influencers, journalists and media outlets who are STILL pretending this isn’t happening. Because the latest evidence is not speculation. Not theory. Not “online noise.” It is police-authored material, FOI responses, internal directives, operational records, and forensic documents — and it paints a picture so staggering that the silence around it is becoming a scandal in itself. Here’s what the public has now learned: • 5,000–10,000 crime reports rejected across the UK in just three months (Dec 2021–Mar 2022) Victims and witnesses were turned away by instruction. Crimes simply erased. • Police created a parallel system to block vaccine-related allegations Scotland’s “Speirs Directive.” NPCC internal messages. Operation Teller. This wasn’t incompetence — it was policy. • 15,000+ Yellow Card reports ignored Filed away, never acted on, never investigated. • 100,000+ pages of autopsy data suppressed Including 2,500 cases showing spike protein persistence years after vaccination, and excess mortality data up to 20% higher in the vaccinated population. • Evidence of undeclared contaminants Graphene structures documented across 26 global studies — and the UK authorities knew. • Certificates amended to attribute deaths to Covid Even when forensic evidence showed otherwise. This is not small. This is not niche. This is not a “community story.” This is the largest public-health, policing and regulatory scandal in a century — and Mark Sexton is absolutely right: WHERE ARE THE BIG VOICES? WHERE ARE THE MILLION-FOLLOWER ACCOUNTS? WHERE IS THE UK MEDIA? The silence speaks louder than any headline. Mass deaths. State cover-up. Police complicity. Regulators involved. Judiciary informed. Parliament aware. And still, most of Britain’s journalism class would rather talk about the Budget. For anyone still pretending this doesn’t matter: This is not “online drama.” This is a crime scene. A national emergency. A historical reckoning. And thanks to people like Mark Sexton, Ian Clayton, and every whistleblower coming forward — the truth is breaking through whether the “big hitters” like it or not. The silence is over. The evidence is here. And the British public will not be gaslit into looking away. I’ll amplify this. So should you. More phases are coming. And when the full truth detonates, the ones who stayed silent will be remembered just as clearly as the ones who stood up. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton

Jim Ferguson

178,099 views • 8 months ago

🇺🇸 KAMALA: TRUMP IS TURNING DOJ INTO A PERSONAL WEAPON "This is a full-on frontal attack on the rule of law in our country. The Supreme Court during the course of the election cycle made the decision, as you'll recall, that the President would be immune from any of his conduct while in office. So we went into the election with this individual, Trump, knowing that he would essentially be immune from any consequence from misbehavior while in office. What we see is that the rule of law is very much under attack by this President, who thinks that the Department of Justice is his personal lawyer and is basically subverting the will of the people around constitutional safeguards." Source: Aaron Rupar
2:15

🇺🇸 KAMALA: TRUMP IS TURNING DOJ INTO A PERSONAL WEAPON "This is a full-on frontal attack on the rule of law in our country. The Supreme Court during the course of the election cycle made the decision, as you'll recall, that the President would be immune from any of his conduct while in office. So we went into the election with this individual, Trump, knowing that he would essentially be immune from any consequence from misbehavior while in office. What we see is that the rule of law is very much under attack by this President, who thinks that the Department of Justice is his personal lawyer and is basically subverting the will of the people around constitutional safeguards." Source: Aaron Rupar

Mario Nawfal

122,979 views • 9 months ago

BREAKING: Pete Hegseth shuts it down — the strike footage is NOT being released for the time being. The Secretary of War confirmed the classified video of U.S. strikes on Venezuelan narco-traffickers will stay sealed, despite mounting pressure to make it public. HEGSETH: “In keeping with longstanding Department of War policy, Department of Defense policy, of course we’re not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the public.” “HASC and SASC and appropriate committees will see it, but not the general public.”
0:30

BREAKING: Pete Hegseth shuts it down — the strike footage is NOT being released for the time being. The Secretary of War confirmed the classified video of U.S. strikes on Venezuelan narco-traffickers will stay sealed, despite mounting pressure to make it public. HEGSETH: “In keeping with longstanding Department of War policy, Department of Defense policy, of course we’re not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the public.” “HASC and SASC and appropriate committees will see it, but not the general public.”

Overton

220,405 views • 7 months ago