Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

PUBLIC RELEASE: Constitutional Correspondence (dated 18 November 2025) Today, Ethical Approach UK, jointly with Mark Sexton (M.Sexton), has placed into the public domain the full Constitutional Correspondence dated 18 November 2025, issued to: • the Lady Chief Justice • the Secretary of State for Justice • the Attorney General...

EthicalApproach's profile picture

ETHICAL APPROACH UK

31,085 subscribers

391,670 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨EXPLOSIVE: THE DAY OF RECKONING HAS BEGUN — THE EVIDENCE THEY SWORE WOULD NEVER SEE LIGHT IS NOW PUBLIC This morning, retired police constable Mark Sexton released Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. What’s now public is explosive — and it proves what millions suspected: There was a UK-wide order to block vaccine-related criminal complaints. And the proof comes not from whistleblowers or speculation… …but from police-authored documents, FOI responses, and recorded interactions. Here’s what Phase 1 confirms: • Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive ordered officers NOT to accept or record covid-vaccine crime allegations. • NPCC communications show the same blanket policy was mirrored across the UK. • Frontline officers were prevented from taking evidence — on camera, in multiple stations. • Crime reference 6029679/21 WAS real, active and resourced, until it was suddenly shut down with no lawful basis. • Judges made rulings without being given the full picture — because police failed to disclose the national ban on recording vaccine-related allegations. Every major institution involved — police, Parliament, judiciary — is now implicated in withholding or concealing material facts from the public. And this is only Phase 1. Sexton confirms: More phases are coming More documents will be released Thousands of additional files exist beyond what was included today Every claim in the 18 Nov correspondence is backed by verifiable evidence For years, people were smeared as “conspiracy theorists” for saying this happened. Today, the police’s own documents prove it did. This will have national consequences. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency — that’s the standard this release sets. Share widely. The public deserves the truth. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton
6:49

🚨EXPLOSIVE: THE DAY OF RECKONING HAS BEGUN — THE EVIDENCE THEY SWORE WOULD NEVER SEE LIGHT IS NOW PUBLIC This morning, retired police constable Mark Sexton released Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. What’s now public is explosive — and it proves what millions suspected: There was a UK-wide order to block vaccine-related criminal complaints. And the proof comes not from whistleblowers or speculation… …but from police-authored documents, FOI responses, and recorded interactions. Here’s what Phase 1 confirms: • Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive ordered officers NOT to accept or record covid-vaccine crime allegations. • NPCC communications show the same blanket policy was mirrored across the UK. • Frontline officers were prevented from taking evidence — on camera, in multiple stations. • Crime reference 6029679/21 WAS real, active and resourced, until it was suddenly shut down with no lawful basis. • Judges made rulings without being given the full picture — because police failed to disclose the national ban on recording vaccine-related allegations. Every major institution involved — police, Parliament, judiciary — is now implicated in withholding or concealing material facts from the public. And this is only Phase 1. Sexton confirms: More phases are coming More documents will be released Thousands of additional files exist beyond what was included today Every claim in the 18 Nov correspondence is backed by verifiable evidence For years, people were smeared as “conspiracy theorists” for saying this happened. Today, the police’s own documents prove it did. This will have national consequences. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency — that’s the standard this release sets. Share widely. The public deserves the truth. ETHICAL APPROACH UK M.Sexton

Jim Ferguson

521,489 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Evidence Release: Phase 1 Today, we release Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. This supplemental file demonstrates, by the provision of police-authored material, that: • A UK-wide blanket instruction existed to block the recording and investigation of vaccine-related criminal allegations, confirmed by Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive and corroborated by NPCC internal communications. • Frontline officers were prevented from accepting evidence, as shown in recorded public interactions and contemporaneous operational materials. • CRN 6029679/21 was never “without foundation” - a still-active evidence portal, hundreds of submitted statements and multiple police assurances confirm that a functioning investigation existed before it was subsequently shut down. • Judicial findings were made without key material facts, because police did not disclose the full investigative footprint, relevant national guidance or the provenance of the nationwide rejection policy. This evidence fully supports and substantiates every assertion made in the 18 November correspondence. Importantly, this is only Phase 1. Further releases will follow, each addressing additional strands of the evidential picture. We remain grateful for the extraordinary public support shown so far. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency will continue to guide every step. PDF download Evidence Release: Phase 1 The video presentation by M.Sexton, which accompanies this post, can also be seen on YouTube, using the following link: Please take the time to read and share this evidential material, so that everyone has the opportunity to understand what has taken place and what continues to take place.
6:49

Evidence Release: Phase 1 Today, we release Phase 1 of the documentary evidence supporting the Constitutional Correspondence issued on 18 November 2025. This supplemental file demonstrates, by the provision of police-authored material, that: • A UK-wide blanket instruction existed to block the recording and investigation of vaccine-related criminal allegations, confirmed by Police Scotland’s Speirs Directive and corroborated by NPCC internal communications. • Frontline officers were prevented from accepting evidence, as shown in recorded public interactions and contemporaneous operational materials. • CRN 6029679/21 was never “without foundation” - a still-active evidence portal, hundreds of submitted statements and multiple police assurances confirm that a functioning investigation existed before it was subsequently shut down. • Judicial findings were made without key material facts, because police did not disclose the full investigative footprint, relevant national guidance or the provenance of the nationwide rejection policy. This evidence fully supports and substantiates every assertion made in the 18 November correspondence. Importantly, this is only Phase 1. Further releases will follow, each addressing additional strands of the evidential picture. We remain grateful for the extraordinary public support shown so far. Integrity, accuracy and constitutional transparency will continue to guide every step. PDF download Evidence Release: Phase 1 The video presentation by M.Sexton, which accompanies this post, can also be seen on YouTube, using the following link: Please take the time to read and share this evidential material, so that everyone has the opportunity to understand what has taken place and what continues to take place.

ETHICAL APPROACH UK

352,385 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

EFF Treasurer General and member of the Impeachment Committee, Hon. Omphile Maotwe, calls out the Chairperson for treating Ramaphosa’s objection to the Evidence Leader in isolation from the correspondence received from the Secretary-General of the ANC, who raised the same issues with Ramaphosa. TG argues that these issues are not different from the declarations made by Advocate Madonsela and the matters raised in the document submitted by the Senior Counsel. These issues are intertwined and originate from the ANC, whose president is also the President of the country. #EFFInParliament #ImpeachmentCommittee
3:25

EFF Treasurer General and member of the Impeachment Committee, Hon. Omphile Maotwe, calls out the Chairperson for treating Ramaphosa’s objection to the Evidence Leader in isolation from the correspondence received from the Secretary-General of the ANC, who raised the same issues with Ramaphosa. TG argues that these issues are not different from the declarations made by Advocate Madonsela and the matters raised in the document submitted by the Senior Counsel. These issues are intertwined and originate from the ANC, whose president is also the President of the country. #EFFInParliament #ImpeachmentCommittee

Economic Freedom Fighters

15,690 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Monday 5th of January 2026 Open correspondence sent to President Donald Trump, from Mark Sexton and myself, which is self explanatory. Short video attached below explaining our reasons for contacting President Trump. You can view and download the correspondence via this link: If anyone else wants to send the letter to The White House via email, copy and paste the link to the letter into the comments section on the White House contact page. You can add your own thoughts and concerns there too if you wish to do so. Here is a link to the relevant White House contact page: Please share far and wide. Thank you from both Mark and I.
5:43

Monday 5th of January 2026 Open correspondence sent to President Donald Trump, from Mark Sexton and myself, which is self explanatory. Short video attached below explaining our reasons for contacting President Trump. You can view and download the correspondence via this link: If anyone else wants to send the letter to The White House via email, copy and paste the link to the letter into the comments section on the White House contact page. You can add your own thoughts and concerns there too if you wish to do so. Here is a link to the relevant White House contact page: Please share far and wide. Thank you from both Mark and I.

ETHICAL APPROACH UK

85,085 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Clarification Sought from Taoiseach, Justice Minister and Garda Commissioner Over Tullamore Show Incident The People’s Media Network, SnD Media, has formally written to An Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Minister for Justice Jim O’Callaghan, and Garda Commissioner Justin Kelly seeking urgent clarification on two related matters of significant public concern: the physical detention of contractor Christopher Duffy at the Tullamore Show for attempting to ask a question of public representatives, and the policing of fuel demonstrations earlier this year. At the Tullamore Show last Saturday, Mr Duffy was physically detained by members of An Garda Síochána after approaching An Taoiseach and other representatives with a question. Video footage of the incident has since circulated widely on social media, accumulating millions of views and sparking widespread public discussion about access to elected officials and the right of citizens to ask questions in public settings. Mr Duffy has provided feedback emphasising the growing frustration among the public. He described feeling under continuous scrutiny at the event, stating that every move he made was met with intimidation from members of An Garda Síochána. SnD Media will be releasing further analysis and feedback from citizens later today, including contributions from Michelle Keane, John Dallon, and Councillor Gavin Pepper. In separate formal emails sent this week, the People’s Media Network has asked the three senior figures to address why members of the general public were not permitted to put questions to An Taoiseach and other representatives at the event, with specific reference to Mr Duffy’s detention. The correspondence also raises questions about the April fuel demonstrations, which organisers, including Mr Duffy, say were arranged in ongoing communication with An Garda Síochána. According to the organisers, no prior instruction was issued by Gardaí before a large-scale deployment of Garda and Defence Forces personnel moved to clear the site, during which batons and pepper spray were used on multiple peaceful demonstrators. The People’s Media Network has framed the requests as a matter of democratic accountability, emphasising the importance of transparency regarding freedom of expression, the right to peaceful assembly, due process, and the proportionate use of force by An Garda Síochána. Analysis of the Tullamore Show incidents and the subsequent online reaction points to growing public unease about the space available for ordinary citizens to engage directly with their elected representatives. The rapid spread of the video of Mr Duffy’s detention has amplified calls for clear answers from those in positions of authority. SnD Media will continue to monitor responses to the correspondence and will report further as developments arise, including the additional citizen feedback scheduled for release later today.
1:16

Clarification Sought from Taoiseach, Justice Minister and Garda Commissioner Over Tullamore Show Incident The People’s Media Network, SnD Media, has formally written to An Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Minister for Justice Jim O’Callaghan, and Garda Commissioner Justin Kelly seeking urgent clarification on two related matters of significant public concern: the physical detention of contractor Christopher Duffy at the Tullamore Show for attempting to ask a question of public representatives, and the policing of fuel demonstrations earlier this year. At the Tullamore Show last Saturday, Mr Duffy was physically detained by members of An Garda Síochána after approaching An Taoiseach and other representatives with a question. Video footage of the incident has since circulated widely on social media, accumulating millions of views and sparking widespread public discussion about access to elected officials and the right of citizens to ask questions in public settings. Mr Duffy has provided feedback emphasising the growing frustration among the public. He described feeling under continuous scrutiny at the event, stating that every move he made was met with intimidation from members of An Garda Síochána. SnD Media will be releasing further analysis and feedback from citizens later today, including contributions from Michelle Keane, John Dallon, and Councillor Gavin Pepper. In separate formal emails sent this week, the People’s Media Network has asked the three senior figures to address why members of the general public were not permitted to put questions to An Taoiseach and other representatives at the event, with specific reference to Mr Duffy’s detention. The correspondence also raises questions about the April fuel demonstrations, which organisers, including Mr Duffy, say were arranged in ongoing communication with An Garda Síochána. According to the organisers, no prior instruction was issued by Gardaí before a large-scale deployment of Garda and Defence Forces personnel moved to clear the site, during which batons and pepper spray were used on multiple peaceful demonstrators. The People’s Media Network has framed the requests as a matter of democratic accountability, emphasising the importance of transparency regarding freedom of expression, the right to peaceful assembly, due process, and the proportionate use of force by An Garda Síochána. Analysis of the Tullamore Show incidents and the subsequent online reaction points to growing public unease about the space available for ordinary citizens to engage directly with their elected representatives. The rapid spread of the video of Mr Duffy’s detention has amplified calls for clear answers from those in positions of authority. SnD Media will continue to monitor responses to the correspondence and will report further as developments arise, including the additional citizen feedback scheduled for release later today.

SnDMedia

12,022 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#WATCH | NPP (National People's Party) withdraws its support to the Manipur Government with immediate effect. In Delhi, NPP MLA & National Secretary (Political Affairs) Sheikh Noorul Hassan says, "In the letter issued by national president Conrad K Sangma, he has mentioned and it is known fact that because of the failure of the present CM N Biren Singh and his Govt in bringing peace and normalcy in the state, the law and order is completely messed up in Manipur... There is no law and order, no normalcy, there is no roadmap ahead to bring peace and normalcy in Manipur. This unfortunate violence and conflict that is taking place for the last 18n months has completely eroded the confidence of general public today in the street...We are also under scrutiny of the general public, what are we doing as we were supporting the BJP-led Govt from outside without condition. But the present Govt failed to bring back normalcy and peace in the state so finally the national president has taken the step in this regard...NPP will go with the general public, the wishes of the general public...NPP is part of NDA. We have withdrawn from Manipur on the demand and seeing the prevailing law & order situation and the wishes of general public. We have not withdrawn on our own will..."
4:45

#WATCH | NPP (National People's Party) withdraws its support to the Manipur Government with immediate effect. In Delhi, NPP MLA & National Secretary (Political Affairs) Sheikh Noorul Hassan says, "In the letter issued by national president Conrad K Sangma, he has mentioned and it is known fact that because of the failure of the present CM N Biren Singh and his Govt in bringing peace and normalcy in the state, the law and order is completely messed up in Manipur... There is no law and order, no normalcy, there is no roadmap ahead to bring peace and normalcy in Manipur. This unfortunate violence and conflict that is taking place for the last 18n months has completely eroded the confidence of general public today in the street...We are also under scrutiny of the general public, what are we doing as we were supporting the BJP-led Govt from outside without condition. But the present Govt failed to bring back normalcy and peace in the state so finally the national president has taken the step in this regard...NPP will go with the general public, the wishes of the general public...NPP is part of NDA. We have withdrawn from Manipur on the demand and seeing the prevailing law & order situation and the wishes of general public. We have not withdrawn on our own will..."

ANI

24,481 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

In the second matter before the Constitutional Court, filed by former opposition Member of Parliament Prince Dubeko Sibanda, the argument was that Parliament could not lawfully debate Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 because the bill itself is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court ruled that the application was not yet ripe for determination, meaning that the parliamentary process must first run its course before the applicant can return to court to challenge the outcome. Once again, many lawyers have described the Court’s approach as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court is declining to engage with the substantive constitutional questions now and is instead postponing their determination. However, the issues will not disappear. Even if the matter proceeds through the High Court first, it is almost inevitable that it will eventually return to the Constitutional Court on appeal for a final determination on the merits. In short, the Constitutional Court has not resolved the constitutional questions surrounding CAB 3; it has merely deferred them.
1:48

In the second matter before the Constitutional Court, filed by former opposition Member of Parliament Prince Dubeko Sibanda, the argument was that Parliament could not lawfully debate Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 because the bill itself is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court ruled that the application was not yet ripe for determination, meaning that the parliamentary process must first run its course before the applicant can return to court to challenge the outcome. Once again, many lawyers have described the Court’s approach as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court is declining to engage with the substantive constitutional questions now and is instead postponing their determination. However, the issues will not disappear. Even if the matter proceeds through the High Court first, it is almost inevitable that it will eventually return to the Constitutional Court on appeal for a final determination on the merits. In short, the Constitutional Court has not resolved the constitutional questions surrounding CAB 3; it has merely deferred them.

Hopewell Chin’ono

39,069 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Our attention has been drawn to public remarks by the Controller of Budget suggesting that certain public funds fall outside any framework of oversight and accountability. This characterisation is inaccurate and requires clarification. The mandate of the Office of the Controller of Budget is defined by Article 228 of the Constitution and the Controller of Budget Act, 2016. Under Article 228(4), the office authorises withdrawals from public funds under Articles 204, 206 and 207 — the Equalisation Fund, the Consolidated Fund and County Revenue Funds — and, under the Act, from any other public fund that an Act of Parliament expressly places under its approval. In every case, Article 228(5) requires only that she confirm the withdrawal is authorised by law. The funds referred to in the interview were established by their own legislation, each with defined mechanisms for management, withdrawal and audit. They remain fully subject to the oversight of the Auditor-General and Parliament. To suggest that money lawfully appropriated and administered under an Act of Parliament is beyond scrutiny is to misstate both the law and the facts. The Controller of Budget is an independent constitutional office, and Government respects that independence. Independence, however, is exercised through the constitutional and statutory instruments provided — reports to Parliament and lawful approval of withdrawals — not through public commentary that mischaracterises the legal framework. Where any office holder believes their mandate should be widened, the proper avenue is the legislative process. Government notes that amendments to the Public Finance Management Act to expand oversight of funds and levies outside existing budget channels are already before Parliament, and it welcomes that debate on its merits
3:02

Our attention has been drawn to public remarks by the Controller of Budget suggesting that certain public funds fall outside any framework of oversight and accountability. This characterisation is inaccurate and requires clarification. The mandate of the Office of the Controller of Budget is defined by Article 228 of the Constitution and the Controller of Budget Act, 2016. Under Article 228(4), the office authorises withdrawals from public funds under Articles 204, 206 and 207 — the Equalisation Fund, the Consolidated Fund and County Revenue Funds — and, under the Act, from any other public fund that an Act of Parliament expressly places under its approval. In every case, Article 228(5) requires only that she confirm the withdrawal is authorised by law. The funds referred to in the interview were established by their own legislation, each with defined mechanisms for management, withdrawal and audit. They remain fully subject to the oversight of the Auditor-General and Parliament. To suggest that money lawfully appropriated and administered under an Act of Parliament is beyond scrutiny is to misstate both the law and the facts. The Controller of Budget is an independent constitutional office, and Government respects that independence. Independence, however, is exercised through the constitutional and statutory instruments provided — reports to Parliament and lawful approval of withdrawals — not through public commentary that mischaracterises the legal framework. Where any office holder believes their mandate should be widened, the proper avenue is the legislative process. Government notes that amendments to the Public Finance Management Act to expand oversight of funds and levies outside existing budget channels are already before Parliament, and it welcomes that debate on its merits

Hon. Aden Duale, EGH

226,257 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

As Zimbabwe approaches a critical stage in the consideration of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, the Convener of the Constitution Defenders Forum, TENDAI BITI, presents a detailed analysis of the Bill, its constitutional implications, and the dangers it poses to democratic governance, constitutionalism, and the sovereignty of the people. At this crucial juncture, as Parliament prepares to deliberate on this far-reaching constitutional amendment, we encourage all citizens to engage with the issues, understand what is at stake, and participate in the defence of the Constitution. Watch the full video here: #RejectAmendmentNo3 #DefendTheConstitution
2:23

As Zimbabwe approaches a critical stage in the consideration of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, the Convener of the Constitution Defenders Forum, TENDAI BITI, presents a detailed analysis of the Bill, its constitutional implications, and the dangers it poses to democratic governance, constitutionalism, and the sovereignty of the people. At this crucial juncture, as Parliament prepares to deliberate on this far-reaching constitutional amendment, we encourage all citizens to engage with the issues, understand what is at stake, and participate in the defence of the Constitution. Watch the full video here: #RejectAmendmentNo3 #DefendTheConstitution

Constitution Defenders Forum

15,189 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

In my pursuit of justice and commitment to accountability and good governance, I have filed Constitutional Petition HCCHRPET/E053/2025 in the High Court of Mombasa. The petition challenges the County Government’s irregular procurement of the KSh 17 Billion Waste Management Project, after exhausting all avenues to obtain disclosure on how the tender was approved without County Assembly approval. There is no evidence of tender advertisement, no public participation, and no Environmental Impact Assessment. The County Government’s refusal to release procurement documents violates Article 35 of the Constitution and the Access to Information Act. The petition seeks to: 1. Nullify all irregular tenders 2. Secure full disclosure of all documents 3. Invite investigations by EACC and PPRA 4. Obtain court orders to ensure future projects follow the law and proper public participation processes. This petition is a firm stand against opacity and misuse of public resources. I remain committed to protecting citizens’ rights and ensuring our institutions uphold the transparency and accountability required by the Constitution.
1:38

In my pursuit of justice and commitment to accountability and good governance, I have filed Constitutional Petition HCCHRPET/E053/2025 in the High Court of Mombasa. The petition challenges the County Government’s irregular procurement of the KSh 17 Billion Waste Management Project, after exhausting all avenues to obtain disclosure on how the tender was approved without County Assembly approval. There is no evidence of tender advertisement, no public participation, and no Environmental Impact Assessment. The County Government’s refusal to release procurement documents violates Article 35 of the Constitution and the Access to Information Act. The petition seeks to: 1. Nullify all irregular tenders 2. Secure full disclosure of all documents 3. Invite investigations by EACC and PPRA 4. Obtain court orders to ensure future projects follow the law and proper public participation processes. This petition is a firm stand against opacity and misuse of public resources. I remain committed to protecting citizens’ rights and ensuring our institutions uphold the transparency and accountability required by the Constitution.

Mohammed Ali, CBS, HSC

21,069 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 An Garda Síochána has ‘serious concerns’ with The Ditch: The Party Line As contributor Cian Ó Concubhair said: ‘The disinformation coming out of An Garda Síochána and the Department of Justice around drugs policing is really astonishing.’ Clip below. An Garda Síochána’s director of communications responds: ‘I wish to raise serious concerns with commentary you carried that accuses the Garda Commissioner of engaging in “disinformation”. ‘As you are aware, disinformation is false or misleading information that is spread on purpose to trick people, lie to the public, or gain power and money. ‘As such, your contributor has accused the Commissioner of lying to the public and to the Constitutional Convention when speaking on the de-criminalisation of illegal drugs. This is an incredibly serious charge, which has no basis in fact. ‘As a matter of fact, the Commissioner, at the invitation of the Chair of the Convention, was providing the expert view of An Garda Síochána based on extensive national and international experience that the de-criminalisation of illegal drugs ultimately benefits organised crime groups, who are engaged in murder, intimidation, slavery and people trafficking. ‘The Commissioner has said on the public record that An Garda Síochána supports the health-led approach, which is Government policy. ‘This is not disinformation – this is based on factual evidence from other jurisdictions that have de-criminalised certain previously illegal drugs. ‘While contributors are, of course, entitled to express their opinion and to disagree with our stated view, in the interests of fairness and balance, An Garda Síochána should have been provided with an opportunity to provide its view. ‘There is also an onus on The Ditch to publish factual information. It is not factual to say that the Commissioner engaged in disinformation and I would request that our comments in relation to the de-criminalisation of drugs that are a matter of public record are provided as part of your most recently published article.’
0:59

🚨 An Garda Síochána has ‘serious concerns’ with The Ditch: The Party Line As contributor Cian Ó Concubhair said: ‘The disinformation coming out of An Garda Síochána and the Department of Justice around drugs policing is really astonishing.’ Clip below. An Garda Síochána’s director of communications responds: ‘I wish to raise serious concerns with commentary you carried that accuses the Garda Commissioner of engaging in “disinformation”. ‘As you are aware, disinformation is false or misleading information that is spread on purpose to trick people, lie to the public, or gain power and money. ‘As such, your contributor has accused the Commissioner of lying to the public and to the Constitutional Convention when speaking on the de-criminalisation of illegal drugs. This is an incredibly serious charge, which has no basis in fact. ‘As a matter of fact, the Commissioner, at the invitation of the Chair of the Convention, was providing the expert view of An Garda Síochána based on extensive national and international experience that the de-criminalisation of illegal drugs ultimately benefits organised crime groups, who are engaged in murder, intimidation, slavery and people trafficking. ‘The Commissioner has said on the public record that An Garda Síochána supports the health-led approach, which is Government policy. ‘This is not disinformation – this is based on factual evidence from other jurisdictions that have de-criminalised certain previously illegal drugs. ‘While contributors are, of course, entitled to express their opinion and to disagree with our stated view, in the interests of fairness and balance, An Garda Síochána should have been provided with an opportunity to provide its view. ‘There is also an onus on The Ditch to publish factual information. It is not factual to say that the Commissioner engaged in disinformation and I would request that our comments in relation to the de-criminalisation of drugs that are a matter of public record are provided as part of your most recently published article.’

The Ditch

22,826 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

19th August 2026. Update with regards to the email sent earlier this morning to The Metropolitan Police Professional Standards Directorate. This is the email ETHICAL APPROACH UK has been referring to and made public earlier today, it’s also on his page as explained in the short video below. Here’s a link to the email; Phil Hyland
3:05

19th August 2026. Update with regards to the email sent earlier this morning to The Metropolitan Police Professional Standards Directorate. This is the email ETHICAL APPROACH UK has been referring to and made public earlier today, it’s also on his page as explained in the short video below. Here’s a link to the email; Phil Hyland

M.Sexton

124,367 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🚨Monday 6th of April 2026. A shocking discovery regarding all Police Chief Constables and other senior officers from Guernsey, Jersey, Isle of Man and Gibraltar. 🚨🚨 Proof of a meeting on the 12th of January 2022 held by the National Police Chiefs Council. This is confirmation they all knew about the Crime reference number 6029679/21 lodged at Hammersmith Police Station in The Metropolitan Police jurisdiction on the 20th of December 2021. Ian Clayton ETHICAL APPROACH UK thank you for uncovering this. Outstanding investigative work. 👏👏👏 The Police betrayed the people and here is their own evidence proving it. Ian’s excellent assessment of this new information and the actual minutes from their meeting is attached here. I explain the importance of this in the 5 minute video. Watch the video, read the report, see for yourself who was at this meeting, was your Chief there? Please share this because the public needs to know what the U.K police have done.
5:56

🚨🚨Monday 6th of April 2026. A shocking discovery regarding all Police Chief Constables and other senior officers from Guernsey, Jersey, Isle of Man and Gibraltar. 🚨🚨 Proof of a meeting on the 12th of January 2022 held by the National Police Chiefs Council. This is confirmation they all knew about the Crime reference number 6029679/21 lodged at Hammersmith Police Station in The Metropolitan Police jurisdiction on the 20th of December 2021. Ian Clayton ETHICAL APPROACH UK thank you for uncovering this. Outstanding investigative work. 👏👏👏 The Police betrayed the people and here is their own evidence proving it. Ian’s excellent assessment of this new information and the actual minutes from their meeting is attached here. I explain the importance of this in the 5 minute video. Watch the video, read the report, see for yourself who was at this meeting, was your Chief there? Please share this because the public needs to know what the U.K police have done.

M.Sexton

225,674 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

POLICE WARN AGAINST UNLAWFUL PROTESTS AHEAD OF INAUGURATION By Victoria Kayeye Yambani The Zambia Police Service has issued a strong warning against planned unlawful processions, assemblies and protests across the country, including during Tuesday’s presidential inauguration. Police Inspector General Graphel Musamba says the Service has received credible intelligence that certain groups and individuals are mobilising and inciting members of the public to participate in unlawful protests. He says police are also aware of efforts to mobilise people to protest against the detention of certain suspects currently in police custody. While acknowledging that Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of assembly and association, Mr Musamba says the right must be exercised within the law and is subject to limitations necessary to maintain public safety and order and protect the rights and freedoms of others. The Police Chief says the Zambia Police Service has a constitutional and statutory responsibility to maintain law and order, protect life and property, and ensure public safety and security. He has warned that anyone who participates in, organises, facilitates or supports unlawful activities will be dealt with firmly in accordance with the law. Members of the public have also been cautioned against being incited into violence, obstructing lawful activities or engaging in any conduct that amounts to a criminal offence. Police have further assured that all persons in custody are being accorded their constitutional and legal rights, while urging the public to remain calm, law-abiding and cooperative with law enforcement agencies during this period. #NewsOnTheGo
3:00

POLICE WARN AGAINST UNLAWFUL PROTESTS AHEAD OF INAUGURATION By Victoria Kayeye Yambani The Zambia Police Service has issued a strong warning against planned unlawful processions, assemblies and protests across the country, including during Tuesday’s presidential inauguration. Police Inspector General Graphel Musamba says the Service has received credible intelligence that certain groups and individuals are mobilising and inciting members of the public to participate in unlawful protests. He says police are also aware of efforts to mobilise people to protest against the detention of certain suspects currently in police custody. While acknowledging that Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of assembly and association, Mr Musamba says the right must be exercised within the law and is subject to limitations necessary to maintain public safety and order and protect the rights and freedoms of others. The Police Chief says the Zambia Police Service has a constitutional and statutory responsibility to maintain law and order, protect life and property, and ensure public safety and security. He has warned that anyone who participates in, organises, facilitates or supports unlawful activities will be dealt with firmly in accordance with the law. Members of the public have also been cautioned against being incited into violence, obstructing lawful activities or engaging in any conduct that amounts to a criminal offence. Police have further assured that all persons in custody are being accorded their constitutional and legal rights, while urging the public to remain calm, law-abiding and cooperative with law enforcement agencies during this period. #NewsOnTheGo

Diamond Media

23,534 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

[WATCH] THE SECTION 89 MATTER On the Section 89 matter now before Parliament, so that the public is not misled by those who would dramatise an ordinary constitutional process. The ANC’s posture on the Section 89 Matter is one of procedural neutrality: the process is proceeding in an orderly manner under the binding Constitutional Court judgment, with the Committee’s draft Terms of Reference open for party submissions until Friday 10 July and the work of Parliament continues, it must not be rushed but deliberated carefully. The ANC will participate, if at all, only as amicus curiae, confined to parliamentary process and sequencing, because our duty is to defend the integrity of a constitutional process, not to argue any party’s merits. On the Terms of Reference, the ANC will not support the admissibility of untested hearsay: an inquiry of this gravity demands evidence under oath, properly tested, perjury on those who will think parliament is a playground to mislead or tell plain lies must also be applied. The question before parliament is whether the president committed high crimes and high misdemeanors and did so alive to it, knowingly. That is what parliament is to test but first, is the Panel Report itself a bona fide instrument, did it find correctly that high crimes and high misdemeanors occurred on the part of the president. What we know is that the Public Protector has said no, the SARB has said not so. Then, should parliament proceed now or wait till September court case? We think it is wise and economical to wait because September court gives parliament itself finality and a foundation. That is it. #ANCMediaBriefing #RegisterToVoteANC #YearOfDecisiveAction
5:40

[WATCH] THE SECTION 89 MATTER On the Section 89 matter now before Parliament, so that the public is not misled by those who would dramatise an ordinary constitutional process. The ANC’s posture on the Section 89 Matter is one of procedural neutrality: the process is proceeding in an orderly manner under the binding Constitutional Court judgment, with the Committee’s draft Terms of Reference open for party submissions until Friday 10 July and the work of Parliament continues, it must not be rushed but deliberated carefully. The ANC will participate, if at all, only as amicus curiae, confined to parliamentary process and sequencing, because our duty is to defend the integrity of a constitutional process, not to argue any party’s merits. On the Terms of Reference, the ANC will not support the admissibility of untested hearsay: an inquiry of this gravity demands evidence under oath, properly tested, perjury on those who will think parliament is a playground to mislead or tell plain lies must also be applied. The question before parliament is whether the president committed high crimes and high misdemeanors and did so alive to it, knowingly. That is what parliament is to test but first, is the Panel Report itself a bona fide instrument, did it find correctly that high crimes and high misdemeanors occurred on the part of the president. What we know is that the Public Protector has said no, the SARB has said not so. Then, should parliament proceed now or wait till September court case? We think it is wise and economical to wait because September court gives parliament itself finality and a foundation. That is it. #ANCMediaBriefing #RegisterToVoteANC #YearOfDecisiveAction

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

12,372 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill
3:20

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

Arshad Madani

70,857 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The BJP has hit the ground in Kolkata in full support of the Special Intensive Revision and is now standing outside the office of the CEO, West Bengal. We will not allow Mamata Banerjee to trample over democratic institutions or intimidate constitutional authorities. As the incumbent Chief Minister, she is expected to act within the bounds of constitutional propriety—nothing more, nothing less. West Bengal deserves transparency, fairness, and clean electoral rolls, and we will ensure that this process is protected.
1:39

The BJP has hit the ground in Kolkata in full support of the Special Intensive Revision and is now standing outside the office of the CEO, West Bengal. We will not allow Mamata Banerjee to trample over democratic institutions or intimidate constitutional authorities. As the incumbent Chief Minister, she is expected to act within the bounds of constitutional propriety—nothing more, nothing less. West Bengal deserves transparency, fairness, and clean electoral rolls, and we will ensure that this process is protected.

Amit Malviya

63,782 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨 3.5 MILLION EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS RELEASED If true, this is one of the largest evidence disclosures in modern U.S. history. Names appearing repeatedly in travel logs and correspondence demand answers — not spin. The American people don’t want speculation. They want: • Full transparency • No selective redactions • Equal treatment under the law If powerful individuals traveled repeatedly with Epstein, the public deserves clarity on what was known — and when. Accountability cannot depend on status. Sunlight is the only cure.
1:31

🚨 3.5 MILLION EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS RELEASED If true, this is one of the largest evidence disclosures in modern U.S. history. Names appearing repeatedly in travel logs and correspondence demand answers — not spin. The American people don’t want speculation. They want: • Full transparency • No selective redactions • Equal treatment under the law If powerful individuals traveled repeatedly with Epstein, the public deserves clarity on what was known — and when. Accountability cannot depend on status. Sunlight is the only cure.

Jim Ferguson

39,371 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The NDC withdrew military protection from the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission, a constitutional office holder and public servant and replaced it with police protection. Okay! Today, the president’s son, who holds no public office and has no official business with the state, is being assigned military security funded by the taxpayers money instead of the police. Now imagine if this were Fmr. President Akufo Addo’s daughter, Gyankromah or Edwina. Ghana would be on fire by now. There would be outrage, protests and endless condemnation but because it’s NDC (the saint), we’re expected to stay quiet and pretend this is normal. The hypocrisy among some Ghanaians is loud, embarrassing and absolutely stinks!!! 😷
0:45

The NDC withdrew military protection from the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission, a constitutional office holder and public servant and replaced it with police protection. Okay! Today, the president’s son, who holds no public office and has no official business with the state, is being assigned military security funded by the taxpayers money instead of the police. Now imagine if this were Fmr. President Akufo Addo’s daughter, Gyankromah or Edwina. Ghana would be on fire by now. There would be outrage, protests and endless condemnation but because it’s NDC (the saint), we’re expected to stay quiet and pretend this is normal. The hypocrisy among some Ghanaians is loud, embarrassing and absolutely stinks!!! 😷

CHARLOTTE NICOLE 🕊

26,574 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce