Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Public religious debates that fuel hostility over minor, abstract issues do more harm than good. When disagreements rooted in tradition become public spectacles, they fracture unity instead of nurturing understanding. Serious discussions belong in private spaces, while public spaces should preserve brotherhood, shared worship, and focus on the far... show more

Dr. Yasir Qadhi

692,692 subscribers

35,974 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This video has sparked a heated debate online, with many viewers expressing concern about the experience of women using crowded public trains in India. 💔🚩 Some people say the footage highlights the challenges women face in public spaces and question how such situations have become normalized. Others argue that more context is needed before jumping to conclusions. The clip has left many viewers uncomfortable and has reignited discussions about personal space and public safety.

This video has sparked a heated debate online, with many viewers expressing concern about the experience of women using crowded public trains in India. 💔🚩 Some people say the footage highlights the challenges women face in public spaces and question how such situations have become normalized. Others argue that more context is needed before jumping to conclusions. The clip has left many viewers uncomfortable and has reignited discussions about personal space and public safety.

Kush_zw

160,690 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Milton Friedman on the Federal Reserve: “I’ve long been in favor of abolishing it. There’s no institution in the US that has such a high public standing and such a poor record of performance... It has done far more harm than good.”

Milton Friedman on the Federal Reserve: “I’ve long been in favor of abolishing it. There’s no institution in the US that has such a high public standing and such a poor record of performance... It has done far more harm than good.”

Milton Friedman Quotes

401,324 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Another angle of the Karnaprayag clash appears to show sharp swords being used while others were engaged in a physical fight with their hands. Respect for faith and religious traditions is non-negotiable. But that cannot prevent a serious discussion about carrying sharp weapons in public spaces when they can be used during moments of anger and conflict. No disagreement should escalate to the point where blades enter the equation. The law must be equal for everyone, regardless of identity, religion or background.

Another angle of the Karnaprayag clash appears to show sharp swords being used while others were engaged in a physical fight with their hands. Respect for faith and religious traditions is non-negotiable. But that cannot prevent a serious discussion about carrying sharp weapons in public spaces when they can be used during moments of anger and conflict. No disagreement should escalate to the point where blades enter the equation. The law must be equal for everyone, regardless of identity, religion or background.

Kumaon Jagran

248,087 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

THE DARK REALITY OF HALAL FOOD What happens when religious legal systems begin shaping public policy? On Going Rogue with Lara Logan, Lara speaks with Frank Gaffney, founder of the Center for Security Policy, about what he argues are growing accommodations to Sharia within public institutions. Gaffney points to halal food requirements in government facilities such as schools, hospitals, prisons, and other state institutions. He argues that accommodating halal dietary rules can require separate preparation spaces and specific slaughter practices, raising questions about how religious standards interact with public policy and taxpayer funded institutions. The discussion examines the broader debate over whether religious legal frameworks like Sharia should influence policies inside public systems in the United States. Watch episode 68 of Going Rogue with Lara Logan: Frank Gaffney #HalalFood #LaraLogan #FrankGaffney #ShariaLaw #TexasPolitics

THE DARK REALITY OF HALAL FOOD What happens when religious legal systems begin shaping public policy? On Going Rogue with Lara Logan, Lara speaks with Frank Gaffney, founder of the Center for Security Policy, about what he argues are growing accommodations to Sharia within public institutions. Gaffney points to halal food requirements in government facilities such as schools, hospitals, prisons, and other state institutions. He argues that accommodating halal dietary rules can require separate preparation spaces and specific slaughter practices, raising questions about how religious standards interact with public policy and taxpayer funded institutions. The discussion examines the broader debate over whether religious legal frameworks like Sharia should influence policies inside public systems in the United States. Watch episode 68 of Going Rogue with Lara Logan: Frank Gaffney #HalalFood #LaraLogan #FrankGaffney #ShariaLaw #TexasPolitics

Lara Logan

55,459 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Chicago police just arrested a citizen for cleaning up trash in his own community alleys and streets. His group regularly does the job the city refuses to do. This man and his organization go out and clean public spaces that local government ignores. Instead of thanking him they slapped cuffs on him. Why? Because Chicago has fat contracts with private companies that get paid to do nothing.

Chicago police just arrested a citizen for cleaning up trash in his own community alleys and streets. His group regularly does the job the city refuses to do. This man and his organization go out and clean public spaces that local government ignores. Instead of thanking him they slapped cuffs on him. Why? Because Chicago has fat contracts with private companies that get paid to do nothing.

Kim "Katie" USA

511,893 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Last night, a man secretly took photos of me on a train from London - and admitted it when I confronted him. When I confronted him, he said, “Sorry, I have a bad habit of doing that,” and I stood by him for over five minutes after he deleted image after image of me, sat on the train - just trying to get home. I shared that video to raise awareness because this happens to far too many women like me. Women should feel safe in public spaces, free from invasive and frightening behaviour. This matter has been reported to the police, and a full investigation is underway. At the officer’s request, I have deleted the video of the man taking photos while they conduct their investigation. I will keep you updated where I can. Thank you all again for your kind words of support. No women should feel unsafe or violated in public spaces.

Last night, a man secretly took photos of me on a train from London - and admitted it when I confronted him. When I confronted him, he said, “Sorry, I have a bad habit of doing that,” and I stood by him for over five minutes after he deleted image after image of me, sat on the train - just trying to get home. I shared that video to raise awareness because this happens to far too many women like me. Women should feel safe in public spaces, free from invasive and frightening behaviour. This matter has been reported to the police, and a full investigation is underway. At the officer’s request, I have deleted the video of the man taking photos while they conduct their investigation. I will keep you updated where I can. Thank you all again for your kind words of support. No women should feel unsafe or violated in public spaces.

Anna McGovern

471,753 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Regional Manager for DMV needs to stay in her lane as she loses it over being on camera. When public servants are confronted with the very Constitution they are sworn to uphold, the response shouldn't be ignorance and evasion. Yet, that is exactly what unfolded at the West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles regional office in Charles Town, located in Jefferson County. An independent journalist exercising their protected First Amendment right to film in a public government facility is immediately met with hostility, unlawful demands, and a complete lack of basic legal comprehension by the staff on duty. The incident quickly escalated when the facility's Regional Manager, identified as Lorraine Thompson Vangosen, and the on-duty security guard approached the journalist. Rather than conducting themselves with the professionalism expected of public employees, both individuals displayed a stunning lack of understanding regarding constitutional law and citizen rights: Lorraine and the security guard aggressively asserted that filming inside the DMV was strictly prohibited, demanding that the journalist delete the recorded footage. Staff attempted to claim that because other citizens' faces were on camera, it created an expectation of privacy that violated public service policies. In a public government building, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in open, publicly accessible common areas. When the journalist attempted to calmly de-escalate the situation and explain the legal precedent protecting the filming of public officials in public spaces, both Lorraine and the guard refused to listen, doubling down on their unconstitutional directives. The true nature of their "authority" was exposed the moment law enforcement arrived. After a responding deputy informed both Lorraine and the security guard that the journalist was entirely within their legal rights to record in the public areas of the building, the dynamic completely changed. Rather than issuing an apology or acknowledging their error, both the manager and the guard chose to retreat. For the remainder of the encounter, both individuals stayed completely out of sight, hiding in the back offices until the journalist finally left the premises. This encounter isn't an isolated misunderstanding—it highlights a systemic issue with how government employees interact with the public. When public officials choose to hide instead of acknowledging the law, it proves that accountability is sorely needed.

Regional Manager for DMV needs to stay in her lane as she loses it over being on camera. When public servants are confronted with the very Constitution they are sworn to uphold, the response shouldn't be ignorance and evasion. Yet, that is exactly what unfolded at the West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles regional office in Charles Town, located in Jefferson County. An independent journalist exercising their protected First Amendment right to film in a public government facility is immediately met with hostility, unlawful demands, and a complete lack of basic legal comprehension by the staff on duty. The incident quickly escalated when the facility's Regional Manager, identified as Lorraine Thompson Vangosen, and the on-duty security guard approached the journalist. Rather than conducting themselves with the professionalism expected of public employees, both individuals displayed a stunning lack of understanding regarding constitutional law and citizen rights: Lorraine and the security guard aggressively asserted that filming inside the DMV was strictly prohibited, demanding that the journalist delete the recorded footage. Staff attempted to claim that because other citizens' faces were on camera, it created an expectation of privacy that violated public service policies. In a public government building, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in open, publicly accessible common areas. When the journalist attempted to calmly de-escalate the situation and explain the legal precedent protecting the filming of public officials in public spaces, both Lorraine and the guard refused to listen, doubling down on their unconstitutional directives. The true nature of their "authority" was exposed the moment law enforcement arrived. After a responding deputy informed both Lorraine and the security guard that the journalist was entirely within their legal rights to record in the public areas of the building, the dynamic completely changed. Rather than issuing an apology or acknowledging their error, both the manager and the guard chose to retreat. For the remainder of the encounter, both individuals stayed completely out of sight, hiding in the back offices until the journalist finally left the premises. This encounter isn't an isolated misunderstanding—it highlights a systemic issue with how government employees interact with the public. When public officials choose to hide instead of acknowledging the law, it proves that accountability is sorely needed.

Giggling Ganon

20,949 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 Stop Islamic domination! Mosques shouldn't be playing prayers over loudspeakers Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Every Friday, a government-approved Islamic call to prayer is now being broadcast over downtown Regina. Some people have tried to dismiss concerns about this as nothing more than a complaint about noise. They're wrong. This isn't simply about noise pollution. It's about changing the character of our shared public spaces without public debate and placing an explicitly religious message at the centre of civic life. A source tells Rebel News that this permit was approved by Regina police without ever being brought before Regina city council for public discussion. That should concern every Canadian, regardless of their faith. This isn't like an innocuous church bell. Church bells are tones. They function much like a clock tower, marking the passage of time or calling a congregation together without conveying a specific theological message to everyone within earshot. The Adhan is something entirely different. It is a spoken religious proclamation: "Allah is the Greatest," "I bear witness that there is no god but Allah," "I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah." This is not merely a sound in the background of city life. It is an explicit religious and ideological message being amplified over an entire downtown core. For many Canadians, this raises a much larger question: should governments be facilitating the projection of a particular religion's message into our common civic spaces? Canada has long embraced freedom of religion. Every Canadian should be free to worship, pray, and practice their faith in peace. But freedom of religion is not the same thing as religious domination. No religion should expect the public square to conform to its practices, and no faith should enjoy special privileges that allow it to reshape our common spaces without public consent. Many Canadians also see this as part of a broader trend of increasingly visible Islamic claims over public spaces, whether through amplified calls to prayer or organized prayers in streets and public squares rather than in houses of worship. You may agree with those concerns, or you may not. But Canadians have every right to discuss them. At the same time, residents who object to this decision are now being met with police warnings about hate crimes and increased monitoring of online commentary. The effect is chilling. Many Canadians will reasonably wonder whether they can even voice their opposition without attracting police attention. Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Free citizens have the right to object to decisions made in their name, using public authority, and affecting their communities. That's not hate. That's democracy. If government agencies can authorize this in Regina without public consultation, they can do it anywhere. Today it's Regina. Tomorrow it could be your city. That's why we're launching sign the petition and fund out independent journalism. Because our shared civic spaces belong to everyone, and Canadians deserve a voice before they are fundamentally changed.

🚨 Stop Islamic domination! Mosques shouldn't be playing prayers over loudspeakers Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Every Friday, a government-approved Islamic call to prayer is now being broadcast over downtown Regina. Some people have tried to dismiss concerns about this as nothing more than a complaint about noise. They're wrong. This isn't simply about noise pollution. It's about changing the character of our shared public spaces without public debate and placing an explicitly religious message at the centre of civic life. A source tells Rebel News that this permit was approved by Regina police without ever being brought before Regina city council for public discussion. That should concern every Canadian, regardless of their faith. This isn't like an innocuous church bell. Church bells are tones. They function much like a clock tower, marking the passage of time or calling a congregation together without conveying a specific theological message to everyone within earshot. The Adhan is something entirely different. It is a spoken religious proclamation: "Allah is the Greatest," "I bear witness that there is no god but Allah," "I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah." This is not merely a sound in the background of city life. It is an explicit religious and ideological message being amplified over an entire downtown core. For many Canadians, this raises a much larger question: should governments be facilitating the projection of a particular religion's message into our common civic spaces? Canada has long embraced freedom of religion. Every Canadian should be free to worship, pray, and practice their faith in peace. But freedom of religion is not the same thing as religious domination. No religion should expect the public square to conform to its practices, and no faith should enjoy special privileges that allow it to reshape our common spaces without public consent. Many Canadians also see this as part of a broader trend of increasingly visible Islamic claims over public spaces, whether through amplified calls to prayer or organized prayers in streets and public squares rather than in houses of worship. You may agree with those concerns, or you may not. But Canadians have every right to discuss them. At the same time, residents who object to this decision are now being met with police warnings about hate crimes and increased monitoring of online commentary. The effect is chilling. Many Canadians will reasonably wonder whether they can even voice their opposition without attracting police attention. Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Free citizens have the right to object to decisions made in their name, using public authority, and affecting their communities. That's not hate. That's democracy. If government agencies can authorize this in Regina without public consultation, they can do it anywhere. Today it's Regina. Tomorrow it could be your city. That's why we're launching sign the petition and fund out independent journalism. Because our shared civic spaces belong to everyone, and Canadians deserve a voice before they are fundamentally changed.

Rebel News

17,521 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Watch: British woman slams the British PM, accusing him of erasing British culture to appease his Muslim voter base, who are actively imposing Islam on the public. Do you agree with her? Yes or No? Her statement clearly struck a nerve—just look at the furious reaction from the Muslim Imam. He insists that British culture is outdated and should be confined to private spaces, while Islam, being “universal,” deserves dominance in public life. What is your response to him?

Watch: British woman slams the British PM, accusing him of erasing British culture to appease his Muslim voter base, who are actively imposing Islam on the public. Do you agree with her? Yes or No? Her statement clearly struck a nerve—just look at the furious reaction from the Muslim Imam. He insists that British culture is outdated and should be confined to private spaces, while Islam, being “universal,” deserves dominance in public life. What is your response to him?

Liza Rosen

316,603 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I reiterate that it is imperative that the Speaker of The House be independent and all actions are rooted in integrity and transparency. These efforts to mislead the public and to make it appear as if I was not being truthful about the tabling of the Auditor General’s reports have led to even more confusion. Instead of passing blame and seeking to reprimand others, the Speaker should focus on her duties.

I reiterate that it is imperative that the Speaker of The House be independent and all actions are rooted in integrity and transparency. These efforts to mislead the public and to make it appear as if I was not being truthful about the tabling of the Auditor General’s reports have led to even more confusion. Instead of passing blame and seeking to reprimand others, the Speaker should focus on her duties.

Mark J. Golding

10,375 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This lady said that People shouldn’t be upset at Trump for wanting to remove the Black Lives Matter flag which is merely a piece of cloth exploited by an organization that profited from black people's struggles, while leaving the community with empty promises. Biden and Kamala capitalized on this sentiment to reach office, yet it led them nowhere. She use to believe in these organizations, but she woke up. President Trump has introduced a policy known as the "One Flag Policy," which effectively bans the display of flags other than the American flag. He isn't claiming black lives don't matter; he's arguing that we shouldn't need flags to remind us of our identity or to further divide us. Public spaces should be unified under one flag - the American flag. Schools and churches should concentrate on education and spirituality, not flags that push particular agendas. The presence of BLM and LGBT flags in public buildings can distract from real issues like family, education, and community development. If you own property or a business, you can display any flag you choose, but public areas should symbolize unity for all, not just certain groups. Flags shouldn't deceive anyone into believing they stand for freedom or unity; they can easily become instruments of division. The focus should be on strengthening communities, not on symbolic gestures that don't put food on the table or roofs over our heads.

This lady said that People shouldn’t be upset at Trump for wanting to remove the Black Lives Matter flag which is merely a piece of cloth exploited by an organization that profited from black people's struggles, while leaving the community with empty promises. Biden and Kamala capitalized on this sentiment to reach office, yet it led them nowhere. She use to believe in these organizations, but she woke up. President Trump has introduced a policy known as the "One Flag Policy," which effectively bans the display of flags other than the American flag. He isn't claiming black lives don't matter; he's arguing that we shouldn't need flags to remind us of our identity or to further divide us. Public spaces should be unified under one flag - the American flag. Schools and churches should concentrate on education and spirituality, not flags that push particular agendas. The presence of BLM and LGBT flags in public buildings can distract from real issues like family, education, and community development. If you own property or a business, you can display any flag you choose, but public areas should symbolize unity for all, not just certain groups. Flags shouldn't deceive anyone into believing they stand for freedom or unity; they can easily become instruments of division. The focus should be on strengthening communities, not on symbolic gestures that don't put food on the table or roofs over our heads.

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

56,178 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Africa’s Public Systems Didn’t Just Decline, They Were Left Behind Across many African countries, we’ve quietly normalized weak public systems. From education to energy and transportation, what used to be strong state institutions have gradually given way to private alternatives that are driven by profit, not public good. There was a time when public schools worked and produced generations of people who could compete anywhere in the world. Today, many families are turning to private options, not because they want to, but because they feel they have no real choice. At the heart of this is a deeper issue of purpose and direction. When institutions are not built around clear national interests, they struggle to function in any meaningful way. The private sector can step in, but it will always prioritize profit over people. And that is where the real tension lies. As The Spearhead’s Mckay Chukwu points out, if African countries are serious about long-term progress, then rebuilding strong public institutions grounded in sovereignty and a clear sense of purpose is not optional, it is necessary.

Africa’s Public Systems Didn’t Just Decline, They Were Left Behind Across many African countries, we’ve quietly normalized weak public systems. From education to energy and transportation, what used to be strong state institutions have gradually given way to private alternatives that are driven by profit, not public good. There was a time when public schools worked and produced generations of people who could compete anywhere in the world. Today, many families are turning to private options, not because they want to, but because they feel they have no real choice. At the heart of this is a deeper issue of purpose and direction. When institutions are not built around clear national interests, they struggle to function in any meaningful way. The private sector can step in, but it will always prioritize profit over people. And that is where the real tension lies. As The Spearhead’s Mckay Chukwu points out, if African countries are serious about long-term progress, then rebuilding strong public institutions grounded in sovereignty and a clear sense of purpose is not optional, it is necessary.

The Spearhead

23,432 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

First they raise such slogans which are reflective of their strategy to cripple public services and civil administrative structure. They do this with the aim to intimidate the government and show people that they are more powerful than the State. THEN, they blame the same government when food and medicine supplies run short in areas where they themselves impose lockdowns. This circus should end and these charlatans should realize their game is over.

First they raise such slogans which are reflective of their strategy to cripple public services and civil administrative structure. They do this with the aim to intimidate the government and show people that they are more powerful than the State. THEN, they blame the same government when food and medicine supplies run short in areas where they themselves impose lockdowns. This circus should end and these charlatans should realize their game is over.

Faisal Mumtaz Rathore

18,940 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

🚨 Tensions Rise in Moinabad 🚨 Locals in Moinabad have raised strong objections over what they claim is an illegal mosque construction, alleging that it is encroaching on road and causing serious inconvenience to daily commuters. Awaken Hindus stepped in and halted the construction, demanding immediate action from authorities. Villagers are voicing concerns that despite repeated complaints, no strict measures have been taken. Adding to the controversy, residents allege that the municipal chairman who is muslim has remained inactive on the issue, intensifying public frustration. ⚖️ People are now calling for fair enforcement of the law and protection of public spaces irrespective of community. #Moinabad #PublicConcern #illegalConstruction #Encroachment #VoiceOfPeople

🚨 Tensions Rise in Moinabad 🚨 Locals in Moinabad have raised strong objections over what they claim is an illegal mosque construction, alleging that it is encroaching on road and causing serious inconvenience to daily commuters. Awaken Hindus stepped in and halted the construction, demanding immediate action from authorities. Villagers are voicing concerns that despite repeated complaints, no strict measures have been taken. Adding to the controversy, residents allege that the municipal chairman who is muslim has remained inactive on the issue, intensifying public frustration. ⚖️ People are now calling for fair enforcement of the law and protection of public spaces irrespective of community. #Moinabad #PublicConcern #illegalConstruction #Encroachment #VoiceOfPeople

𝐒𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐫 𝐆𝐨𝐮𝐝

84,826 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Doug Wilson attempted to do some damage control regarding his position on Catholics versus Jews in his ideal Protestant Republic, two centuries into the future. In doing so, he made some interesting statements. Doug makes clear that there will be no public displays of lasciviousness (e.g., pride parades) or idolatry. All public spaces would be Christian, while private spaces would remain private and could allow for synagogues, mosques, and sand demon temples. This is where things go off the rails. First, these pagan places of worship are PUBLIC. How could they be considered otherwise? Second, Tel Aviv is the gayest city in the world. How are you going to restrict pride parades while also allowing their sponsors to operate freely. Third, Doug says there would only be a limited amount of Muslims and Hindus. In what society that allowed Muslims have they remained just a small minority?! They win the demographics game every single time. Finally, I have to point out that this is Doug Wilson’s ideal Christian Nationalist Republic. It boggles my mind that his ideal would include so much compromise right off the bat. But if you ask me, what he’s pining for is actually 1950s America, steeped in 20th century liberalism and the post-war consensus. What do you think?

Doug Wilson attempted to do some damage control regarding his position on Catholics versus Jews in his ideal Protestant Republic, two centuries into the future. In doing so, he made some interesting statements. Doug makes clear that there will be no public displays of lasciviousness (e.g., pride parades) or idolatry. All public spaces would be Christian, while private spaces would remain private and could allow for synagogues, mosques, and sand demon temples. This is where things go off the rails. First, these pagan places of worship are PUBLIC. How could they be considered otherwise? Second, Tel Aviv is the gayest city in the world. How are you going to restrict pride parades while also allowing their sponsors to operate freely. Third, Doug says there would only be a limited amount of Muslims and Hindus. In what society that allowed Muslims have they remained just a small minority?! They win the demographics game every single time. Finally, I have to point out that this is Doug Wilson’s ideal Christian Nationalist Republic. It boggles my mind that his ideal would include so much compromise right off the bat. But if you ask me, what he’s pining for is actually 1950s America, steeped in 20th century liberalism and the post-war consensus. What do you think?

Defiant Baptist

38,704 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This Sunday morning, I ran an easy 8K on the unopened Ragigudda flyover in Jayanagar. Ironically, the only good to come out of BMRCL and BBMP’s delay is that this half-complete flyover has become a popular running, cycling, and skating track. Every morning, you’ll find hundreds of kids skating, people practising yoga, and walkers enjoying traffic-free peace. It’s a powerful reminder that citizens will embrace public spaces if they’re made available for active mobility - and if cars are kept out. Across the world, successful cities prioritise people over motor vehicles. Bengaluru, with its year-round mild climate, is uniquely positioned to do this. It may be the only Indian city where walking and cycling can thrive naturally. Instead of wasting resources on more flyovers and tunnel roads, the state government must invest in public transport and reclaim urban spaces for people. A less polluted, more liveable, and happier Bengaluru is not just possible - it’s waiting. Siddaramaiah DK Shivakumar

This Sunday morning, I ran an easy 8K on the unopened Ragigudda flyover in Jayanagar. Ironically, the only good to come out of BMRCL and BBMP’s delay is that this half-complete flyover has become a popular running, cycling, and skating track. Every morning, you’ll find hundreds of kids skating, people practising yoga, and walkers enjoying traffic-free peace. It’s a powerful reminder that citizens will embrace public spaces if they’re made available for active mobility - and if cars are kept out. Across the world, successful cities prioritise people over motor vehicles. Bengaluru, with its year-round mild climate, is uniquely positioned to do this. It may be the only Indian city where walking and cycling can thrive naturally. Instead of wasting resources on more flyovers and tunnel roads, the state government must invest in public transport and reclaim urban spaces for people. A less polluted, more liveable, and happier Bengaluru is not just possible - it’s waiting. Siddaramaiah DK Shivakumar

Tejasvi Surya

342,452 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 Man charged with felony after recording a boy in a bathroom stall at Woodfield Mall. 54-year-old Samuel Nutt of Rolling Meadows was arrested after witnesses confronted him inside the restroom. Schaumburg police say he used his phone to secretly record the minor urinating in an adjacent stall. He’s been charged with unauthorized videotaping of a minor and is due back in court on July 24. Witnesses (including teenagers) didn’t let him walk away they held him until mall security and police arrived. This is a reminder that predators operate in everyday public spaces. What should parents be teaching their kids about speaking up when something feels off in public?

🚨 Man charged with felony after recording a boy in a bathroom stall at Woodfield Mall. 54-year-old Samuel Nutt of Rolling Meadows was arrested after witnesses confronted him inside the restroom. Schaumburg police say he used his phone to secretly record the minor urinating in an adjacent stall. He’s been charged with unauthorized videotaping of a minor and is due back in court on July 24. Witnesses (including teenagers) didn’t let him walk away they held him until mall security and police arrived. This is a reminder that predators operate in everyday public spaces. What should parents be teaching their kids about speaking up when something feels off in public?

i Expose Racists & Pedos

213,417 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Boston, MA - In a city known for its historical significance in American freedom, a recent interaction between a Boston Police Sergeant and a citizen has sparked a debate over the boundaries of free speech and city ordinances. The incident involved a citizen peacefully displaying support for President Donald Trump through flag signage in a public space, which led to an encounter with law enforcement. According to the officer, the act was in violation of a Boston city ordinance that prohibits the affixing of signs or advertisements on public property without permission from the mayor's office. City of Boston Ordinance set forth by Mayor Wu states it prohibits individuals from posting or affixing any sign, advertisement, or similar material on public infrastructure like sidewalks, poles, and other structures without explicit consent. The citizen was informed they would be arrested under Chapter 272, Section 53, for failing to comply with this ordinance, highlighting a clash between local regulation and First Amendment rights. Free Speech Advocates argue this case represents an overreach of local laws, potentially infringing on the right to free expression, especially in a public forum. Example is the Supreme Court case like Shurtleff v. City of Boston where the Court emphasized that certain public acts (like flag raising) should be seen as private speech, not government endorsement. Law Enforcement and City Officials maintain that such ordinances are necessary for maintaining order, aesthetics, and safety in public spaces. They argue that while free speech is protected, there are reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions which this ordinance represents. There's a mix of reactions from Bostonians. Some feel that the city's approach stifles political expression, while others believe in upholding the law, suggesting there are plenty of legal avenues for political expression that don't involve violating city ordinances. This incident could prompt discussions or legal challenges on how such ordinances are enforced, especially in light of past Supreme Court rulings emphasizing the protection of symbolic speech in public spaces. This situation in Boston underscores the ongoing tension between individual rights to free expression and the regulatory power of municipalities. While the citizen's arrest might be legally defensible under current ordinances, it's stirring a conversation on where exactly the line should be drawn between public order and the sacred right to free speech.

Boston, MA - In a city known for its historical significance in American freedom, a recent interaction between a Boston Police Sergeant and a citizen has sparked a debate over the boundaries of free speech and city ordinances. The incident involved a citizen peacefully displaying support for President Donald Trump through flag signage in a public space, which led to an encounter with law enforcement. According to the officer, the act was in violation of a Boston city ordinance that prohibits the affixing of signs or advertisements on public property without permission from the mayor's office. City of Boston Ordinance set forth by Mayor Wu states it prohibits individuals from posting or affixing any sign, advertisement, or similar material on public infrastructure like sidewalks, poles, and other structures without explicit consent. The citizen was informed they would be arrested under Chapter 272, Section 53, for failing to comply with this ordinance, highlighting a clash between local regulation and First Amendment rights. Free Speech Advocates argue this case represents an overreach of local laws, potentially infringing on the right to free expression, especially in a public forum. Example is the Supreme Court case like Shurtleff v. City of Boston where the Court emphasized that certain public acts (like flag raising) should be seen as private speech, not government endorsement. Law Enforcement and City Officials maintain that such ordinances are necessary for maintaining order, aesthetics, and safety in public spaces. They argue that while free speech is protected, there are reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions which this ordinance represents. There's a mix of reactions from Bostonians. Some feel that the city's approach stifles political expression, while others believe in upholding the law, suggesting there are plenty of legal avenues for political expression that don't involve violating city ordinances. This incident could prompt discussions or legal challenges on how such ordinances are enforced, especially in light of past Supreme Court rulings emphasizing the protection of symbolic speech in public spaces. This situation in Boston underscores the ongoing tension between individual rights to free expression and the regulatory power of municipalities. While the citizen's arrest might be legally defensible under current ordinances, it's stirring a conversation on where exactly the line should be drawn between public order and the sacred right to free speech.

Chester Tam

209,795 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr