Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Public Scuffle

23,187 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. ​Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, ​without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. ​The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: ​Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. ​ The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. ​ Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. ​Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Giggling Ganon

110,609 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Pattaya bar temporarily closed after tourists assault staff, spark brawl . A bar in Pattaya has shut down temporarily following a widely shared video showing a violent altercation between foreign tourists and Thai nationals. . The incident, which took place on Tuesday, sparked public outrage and concern over the city's image as a tourist destination. . The footage captured two intoxicated foreign men allegedly harassing a female server and provoking other patrons, eventually leading to a chaotic fistfight. . According to police, the tourists entered the venue heavily intoxicated and began acting inappropriately, including allegedly lifting and groping a female staff member without consent. . One staff member reported hitting her head on an air conditioner unit during the incident. Another new employee was reportedly also harassed and has since refused to return to work. . Security guards at the venue claimed they tried to escort the men out peacefully, but the tourists became more aggressive, even pouring beer on one guard's head and challenging others to a fight. . After repeated provocation and assaults on nearby water festival participants, one guard admitted to punching a tourist in the face, which triggered a wider scuffle involving locals and other foreigners. . Police brought in the bar’s management, two guards and the assaulted employee for questioning, along with reviewing CCTV footage. . While no charges have been filed yet, authorities are continuing to investigate. The foreign men involved have not come forward to file a complaint. . As an act of accountability, the bar has voluntarily closed operations temporarily and issued an apology to the public, authorities and affected tourists. . #PattayaNews #ThailandTourism #BarIncident #TouristBehavior #ViralVideo #PattayaBrawl #RespectLocal #ThaiNews #PattayaUpdate

Thenationthailand

131,818 просмотров • 1 год назад

Woman loses her mind over being on camera decided to destroy property and got treated to two cans of spray. ​We are at the United States Post Office in South Pasadena, California, where this incident involved a physical confrontation, damaged equipment, and a deployment of pepper spray. ​The incident began inside the post office lobby, where the cameraman was filming in public exercising his constitutional rights. A female customer inside the lobby objected to being recorded, leading to a brief but tense verbal exchange. ​The situation rapidly escalated when the woman took it upon herself to grab and damage the cameraman*s recording equipment. The confrontation spilled outside onto the post office steps, where she grabbed onto the cameraman's monopod. During the physical struggle over the gear, the cameraman deployed pepper spray directly at her to break her grip and regain control of his equipment but not before she commits battery. Officers from the South Pasadena Police Department arrived on the scene shortly after. Following a review of the cell phone footage captured during the encounter, police issued the woman a criminal citation on the scene for misdemeanor battery and vandalism (the cameraman noted his $400 monopod was broken during the scuffle). True to form from law enforcement from California where they allow criminals to b get away with anything they want. You can bet if the roles were reversed they would have put the guy in cuffs. ​While a citation was issued, the local police department cannot formally file charges; instead, the case packet was forwarded to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office (Alhambra Branch) for review. Public records do not currently show a formal update on whether the DA pursued prosecution or declined the case, which is common in complex misdemeanor altercations involving mutual allegations of assault and self-defense. ​ What are your thoughts on how this situation was handled? Are you surprised by the lack of action from the local PD?

Giggling Ganon

1,096,347 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Off duty officer pins a man down and detains him over a 5 dollar Walmart pizza. You can't make up this level of incompetence. ​A routine trip to a Walmart in Kansas City, Kansas, turned into a illegal detainment for 24-year-old Dayton Borisouth over a $5 frozen pizza he had completely paid for. ​Borisouth was walking toward the exit with his unbagged frozen pizza when an off-duty Kansas City officer working store security stopped him to demand a receipt. Borisouth verbally confirmed he had it but kept walking. Within moments, the situation escalated from there as the officer immediately went hands on and Borisouth was taken to the ground near the entrance. ​ Borisouth repeatedly yelled that he had the receipt in his pocket, pleading with officers to just look at it. Instead, the officer continued to pin him down. As back up arrived one of the officers placing a knee directly on his neck and threatened to bre@k his nose if he didn't comply. Borisouth had the receipt the entire time. Shoplifting charges were never filed, and the department quickly dropped initial citations for non-compliance and interference. ​ Following an internal review, the Kansas City, Kansas Police Department publicly admitted that the off-duty officer should have disengaged the moment Borisouth walked away. ​ The department confirmed that a responding officer used an unapproved, untrained knee-on-neck restraint. Two officers faced disciplinary action and were forced to undergo mandatory retraining. ​Despite the trauma and public backlash, Borisouth and his family chose not to pursue civil rights or personal injury lawsuits. ​After being detained in a police cruiser for nearly an hour, Borisouth was released. Because his pizza had completely thawed and spoiled during the scuffle, he walked right back into the Walmart, showed his receipt to a greeter, and the store gave him a replacement pizza before he finally went home.

Giggling Ganon

83,356 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#Bangladesh: How India’s Deep State and Sheikh Hasina Are Colluding to Destabilize Bangladesh Recently, I shared a leaked conversation between Bangladesh's deposed dictator #SheikhHasina and one of her political operatives. Typically, I would refrain from publicizing private exchanges, but in this case, the public interest clearly outweighed privacy concerns. The leaked discussion not only revealed Hasina’s intentions but also shed light on an unsettling new alliance between her and certain Indian interests. Consider some recent events: On November 10th, a small group of Sheikh Hasina’s supporters attempted to gather in Dhaka to commemorate Noor Hossain Day. These supporters were swiftly dispersed by opposition activists, reflecting a broader consensus in Bangladesh that the Awami League, in its current form, no longer has a legitimate role in the country's politics. The sidelining of Hasina's loyalists is a clear indication of the overwhelming rejection of her regime. However, a peculiar narrative has emerged in parts of the Indian media—most notably IndiaToday—spun this domestic political event into the bizarre claim that Bangladesh’s government is targeting "Trump supporters", as seen in the attached news clip! Indian Godi media is no stranger to manipulating facts, but this reaches an absurd new level. This distorted reporting aligns with the leaked conversation’s implications: Sheikh Hasina and certain Indian media outlets are working in tandem. This appears to be a concerted public relations campaign targeting Western audiences, especially the United States, with the aim of swaying perceptions through manufactured narratives. The timing and nature of this misinformation also suggest deeper collusion between Hasina and India’s right-wing establishment. The Hindu American Foundation (HAF/ Hindu American Foundation)—India's version of AIPAC in the U.S.—has become an active player in shaping American policies to favor India’s interests. Under Modi’s leadership, HAF, which once operated as a relatively benign organization, has evolved into an arm of Hindutva ideology, advancing the BJP's right-wing agenda abroad. The HAF’s shift has seen it actively lobbying for figures like Hasina, despite her egregious human rights record. For over a decade, the Indian-backed dictator Sheikh Hasina ruled Bangladesh with an iron fist. Her regime was marked by gross human rights abuses, including the extrajudicial killing of thousands, the forced disappearance of her opponents, and the imprisonment of countless others. The crackdown reached a peak in July 2024, when her forces led a carnage and killed nearly 1,500 protesters and wounded over 30,000, including many students, in a span of only two weeks. Following an unprecedented uprising, Hasina fled to India on August 5, 2024, ending her regime. Since then, India's right-wing establishment has struggled to come to terms with the loss of a key ally in Bangladesh. They have launched a smear campaign against the country’s new government, labeling the uprising as an "Islamist takeover" and exaggerating isolated, politically motivated attacks as a "genocide against Hindus." These allegations are unfounded, yet the Indian media machine continues to push this narrative relentlessly. The latest ploy—portraying a local political scuffle as a crackdown on "Trump supporters"—is just the latest in a series of disinformation efforts aimed at undermining Bangladesh’s stability. Adding fuel to the fire, certain U.S. Congress members of Indian descent, many connected to HAF, have echoed this sensationalized propaganda. It’s increasingly evident that Indian authorities are attempting to destabilize Bangladesh through a combination of domestic media narratives and international lobbying efforts spearheaded by HAF. India’s decision to provide refuge to Sheikh Hasina, a fugitive facing criminal charges, and their ongoing efforts to undermine Bangladesh’s sovereignty, are hostile acts. By enabling her continued meddling from abroad and orchestrating smear campaigns, India’s actions require serious scrutiny. Bangladesh’s government must consider decisive countermeasures to defend against these destabilizing efforts at home and abroad. In these tense times, Bangladesh must safeguard its sovereignty and stability by addressing these actions firmly and diplomatically. Jon Danilowicz South Asia Perspectives U.S. Embassy Dhaka Department of State Donald J. Trump Amb. Mushfiqul Fazal (Ansarey) Pinaki Bhattacharya MUKTADIR rashid ROMEO Chief Adviser (Govt of Bangladesh) Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press Secretary to CA Sami Tasneem Khalil
2:35

Sensitive content

#Bangladesh: How India’s Deep State and Sheikh Hasina Are Colluding to Destabilize Bangladesh Recently, I shared a leaked conversation between Bangladesh's deposed dictator #SheikhHasina and one of her political operatives. Typically, I would refrain from publicizing private exchanges, but in this case, the public interest clearly outweighed privacy concerns. The leaked discussion not only revealed Hasina’s intentions but also shed light on an unsettling new alliance between her and certain Indian interests. Consider some recent events: On November 10th, a small group of Sheikh Hasina’s supporters attempted to gather in Dhaka to commemorate Noor Hossain Day. These supporters were swiftly dispersed by opposition activists, reflecting a broader consensus in Bangladesh that the Awami League, in its current form, no longer has a legitimate role in the country's politics. The sidelining of Hasina's loyalists is a clear indication of the overwhelming rejection of her regime. However, a peculiar narrative has emerged in parts of the Indian media—most notably IndiaToday—spun this domestic political event into the bizarre claim that Bangladesh’s government is targeting "Trump supporters", as seen in the attached news clip! Indian Godi media is no stranger to manipulating facts, but this reaches an absurd new level. This distorted reporting aligns with the leaked conversation’s implications: Sheikh Hasina and certain Indian media outlets are working in tandem. This appears to be a concerted public relations campaign targeting Western audiences, especially the United States, with the aim of swaying perceptions through manufactured narratives. The timing and nature of this misinformation also suggest deeper collusion between Hasina and India’s right-wing establishment. The Hindu American Foundation (HAF/ Hindu American Foundation)—India's version of AIPAC in the U.S.—has become an active player in shaping American policies to favor India’s interests. Under Modi’s leadership, HAF, which once operated as a relatively benign organization, has evolved into an arm of Hindutva ideology, advancing the BJP's right-wing agenda abroad. The HAF’s shift has seen it actively lobbying for figures like Hasina, despite her egregious human rights record. For over a decade, the Indian-backed dictator Sheikh Hasina ruled Bangladesh with an iron fist. Her regime was marked by gross human rights abuses, including the extrajudicial killing of thousands, the forced disappearance of her opponents, and the imprisonment of countless others. The crackdown reached a peak in July 2024, when her forces led a carnage and killed nearly 1,500 protesters and wounded over 30,000, including many students, in a span of only two weeks. Following an unprecedented uprising, Hasina fled to India on August 5, 2024, ending her regime. Since then, India's right-wing establishment has struggled to come to terms with the loss of a key ally in Bangladesh. They have launched a smear campaign against the country’s new government, labeling the uprising as an "Islamist takeover" and exaggerating isolated, politically motivated attacks as a "genocide against Hindus." These allegations are unfounded, yet the Indian media machine continues to push this narrative relentlessly. The latest ploy—portraying a local political scuffle as a crackdown on "Trump supporters"—is just the latest in a series of disinformation efforts aimed at undermining Bangladesh’s stability. Adding fuel to the fire, certain U.S. Congress members of Indian descent, many connected to HAF, have echoed this sensationalized propaganda. It’s increasingly evident that Indian authorities are attempting to destabilize Bangladesh through a combination of domestic media narratives and international lobbying efforts spearheaded by HAF. India’s decision to provide refuge to Sheikh Hasina, a fugitive facing criminal charges, and their ongoing efforts to undermine Bangladesh’s sovereignty, are hostile acts. By enabling her continued meddling from abroad and orchestrating smear campaigns, India’s actions require serious scrutiny. Bangladesh’s government must consider decisive countermeasures to defend against these destabilizing efforts at home and abroad. In these tense times, Bangladesh must safeguard its sovereignty and stability by addressing these actions firmly and diplomatically. Jon Danilowicz South Asia Perspectives U.S. Embassy Dhaka Department of State Donald J. Trump Amb. Mushfiqul Fazal (Ansarey) Pinaki Bhattacharya MUKTADIR rashid ROMEO Chief Adviser (Govt of Bangladesh) Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press Secretary to CA Sami Tasneem Khalil

Sultan Mohammed Zakaria

47,329 просмотров • 1 год назад