Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
🚨PULLZECHECK DISCUSSION🚨 रepullze says that the EU region should have LESS qualifying spots for #WSOW due to there being fewer top teams, thus allowing for more "mid" teams 😳 How we do we feel about this? Should other regions such as LATAM be given more spots? 🤔
878,461 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 10

@Repullze LATAM deserve more spots 🇧🇷

@Repullze Faded take

@Repullze I made 100 watchpartys I played 10000 tourneys. If shifty and almond his team wouldn’t be there it would be a fair battle eu vs Na. Shifty and almond his team is different level , but not only for us for all the nas too ngl 2 teams a head of every other

@Repullze Host scrims with EU host and you will see how many good EU teams we have

@Repullze Host EU ping costums for a couple weeks and then make a decesion how many EU teams are top tier and should compete. Because all the big costums are hosted on NA ping but the bigger warzone player base is EU if you look at wsow qualifier.

@Repullze More spots for LATAM 🙏🏻🇧🇷

@Repullze So many people commenting about ping are delusional we played an eu custom and won every game on eu host without even our entire roster. Realistically like one eu team that would be considered a top team

@Repullze Big fan of Repullze but I don't think this is entirely true. EU had high placements on Lan last year. EU teams throughout the year have to compete on over 120 ping and late at night. NA teams are on 20 ping and playing afternoon/evenings. That has more of an impact than u think.

@Repullze Avg placing NA = 21 Avg placing EU = 28 Both NA and EU had 5 teams each in the top 11 (split by Amir and Co). 🇲🇽 --- Despite the lack of good prac with a changing meta that EU got better at through the event. ---

@Repullze thats a horrible take ngl

