Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

'PUT LIFE ON HOLD FOR YEARS' 😔 The #MidweekTackle panel explain the gruelling verdict Paul Seedsman and Nathan Murphy have been dealt, after their most recent concussion compensation claim was denied, per Jay Clark. Lauren Wood Corbin Middlemas Jon Ralph

13,852 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

SPECIAL VAMPIRE HUNTER MOTHER’S DAY REPORT: BOMBSHELL INTERVIEW WITH JAY-Z’S ALLEGED ILLEGITIMATE SON WHO CLAIMS THE RAP MOGUL GOT HIS MOM PREGNANT WHEN SHE WAS 16 & JAY-Z WAS 22! I interviewed Rymir Satterthwaite and his godmother, Dr. Lillie Collie, about their claims Rymir is Jay-Z’s biological son. They’ve been fighting in the courts in multiple states for years to get Jay-Z to take a paternity test. Now they’re fighting to expose the corrupt legal system that they believe was rigged to prevent them from getting fair due process. Rymir says he does not want money, he just wants validation and justice. Here are some highlights: - Jay-Z allegedly had sex with Rymir’s mom, Wanda Satterthwaite, when she was 16 and he was 22. Wanda sadly passed away a few years ago. - Jay-Z allegedly took Wanda across state lines when she was a minor from Philadelphia to an apartment in Brooklyn, New York where they had intercourse. - Jay-Z’s lawyers lied in court — they claim they “misspoke”. - Jay-Z has refuted these claims in court despite allegedly trying to settle this outside of court long ago. - Jay-Z has refused to take a paternity test for years. - Rymir and Dr. Lillie claim intimidation tactics have been used against them for years. - Rymir said he was shot at after he filed a civil suit against Jay-Z. - Dr. Lillie believes that Beyoncé played a key role in persuading Jay-Z from acknowledging Rymir and settling the case. - Beyoncé and Jay-Z may have cruelly mocked Rymir in their music. Watch the full interview here: CC: Rymir Is Here Greenbeard

LIZ CROKIN

1,763,450 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Nturo, a martyred village, evacuated three times in 30 years (Original in French published yesterday) The village of Nturo tragically illustrates the fate of Congolese Tutsis. Three times since 1994, these cattle herders have been forced to abandon their lands. Nearly all their cows have been slaughtered, and many of them have been killed by the militias rampant in the region. As early as 1995, Hutu génocidaires and the defeated Rwandan army began venturing farther and farther from the Goma camps, where they were generously assisted by international organizations that turned a blind eye to the fact that they were aiding murderers (including women, often complicit in the genocide). Stolen cattle were slaughtered in abattoirs funded by international aid! Stripped of their belongings and threatened with death simply for being Tutsis - and for the génocidaires, it was about finishing the “job” - they were forced to seek refuge in Rwanda or Uganda, where they lived in camps for years. On October 5, 2023, the village was set ablaze by the Hutu Nyatura militia, the FDLR, and the FARDC. Burundian troops, present as part of one of the many “peace agreements,” were camped on a hill just a few hundred meters away. They stood by, weapons at rest, in perfect complicity with the arsonists. The residents, having had time to flee to Bwiza in an area controlled by the M23, returned two months later after the zone was retaken by the latter. They found their village completely devastated. Since then, they have rebuilt it, but in a more concentrated manner: isolated homes—seen burning in the images—were deemed too difficult to defend. The work accomplished is impressive. Freshly cut wood bears witness to the recent reconstruction. During my daytime visit, only one generator was running. A few kilometers away, you can see the power line supplying Kabila’s farm, but no village benefits from it. These Congolese Tutsis, rooted in Masisi since time immemorial, have been driven from their lands three times in thirty years, the most recent being less than two years ago. They have been massacred, their cattle stolen or killed. Why would they trust the authorities in Kinshasa or the “international community”? The M23 is their only protector, the sole guarantor of their survival. The alternative? At worst, death. At best, an undignified life in a refugee camp in a country not their own. Olivier J.P. Nduhungirehe Yolande Makolo 🇷🇼 Hege Solskinnsbakk

Alain Destexhe

19,375 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I am extremely disappointed and emotionally exhausted by the way my car insurance claim is being handled by ICICI Lombard GIC. What should have been a straightforward insurance claim has turned into a deeply stressful experience involving contradictory assessments, salvage, auction and questions surrounding my RTI cover. I had specifically purchased Return to Invoice (RTI) Cover under my motor insurance policy and paid an additional premium for it. The policy IDV is ₹9,07,980, while the original vehicle invoice value was ₹11,34,999 plus applicable road tax. So naturally, I expected the RTI cover to provide meaningful protection if the vehicle suffered a qualifying total loss. After the accident, the authorised manufacturer service centre assessed the repair requirement and issued a detailed estimate of ₹15,05,259. I was subsequently informed that the vehicle was being treated as a Total Loss and would be dealt with as salvage. At that point, I believed the claim was being processed accordingly. But then things became extremely confusing. The vehicle was apparently listed for auction as salvage. I even have an Instagram reel showing the auction announcement/listing, which I can provide as evidence. My question is simple: If the vehicle was genuinely repairable, why was it treated as salvage and why was it put up for auction? There is more. The same claim manager later contacted me and called me to the insurer’s office, where I was told that the vehicle could apparently be repaired for roughly half of the authorised service centre’s estimate. I was also previously asked for the foreclosure statement of the loan on the damaged vehicle. Why was the foreclosure statement being sought if the claim position was subsequently going to be that the vehicle was repairable? I was also told that authorised service centres may intentionally inflate repair estimates and may even cause additional damage to vehicles. If this allegation is being relied upon to reduce my claim, where is the technical/documentary evidence? I want the surveyor’s report, assessment, item-wise repair comparison, deductions and the technical basis for the revised assessment. Most importantly, I have been told that my RTI cover will not apply. I want a clear written answer: If RTI is genuinely inapplicable, which exact policy clause says so, and what factual condition has not been satisfied? And is the RTI being questioned because the potential RTI settlement could exceed the current IDV? If not, please explain the exact contractual basis. The sequence is extremely difficult for a customer to understand: Total Loss → Salvage → Auction listing → Foreclosure statement requested → Suddenly repairable → RTI questioned/denied. I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking for transparency, accountability, documentary evidence and a fair, reasoned claim decision. This entire process has caused enormous mental stress and suffering. ICICI Lombard GIC, please answer these questions publicly and transparently. Consumer Affairs

Yash Raj

417,420 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen