Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Putin "After the Soviet Union collapsed, we believed we would quickly join the civilized Western world. Today, it seems there is no civilization there—only degradation." There was only degradation and corruption in the west forty years ago as well. What happened was that the Gorbachev-Yeltsin clique carried through a...

MarxEngelsLnin's profile picture

Marx Engels Lenin Stalin Mao Institute

14,843 subscribers

35,301 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Putin: "Immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it seemed to us that we would very quickly become members of the so-called civilized family of European nations - of the civilized Western world in general. Today, however, it turns out that there is no civilization there at all, only outright degradation."
1:15

Putin: "Immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it seemed to us that we would very quickly become members of the so-called civilized family of European nations - of the civilized Western world in general. Today, however, it turns out that there is no civilization there at all, only outright degradation."

Anton Gerashchenko

225,316 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🇷🇺 “There’s no civilization in the West at all. There’s only degradation—everything, through and through.” Putin reflects on the early post-Soviet years, when Russia genuinely believed it would be welcomed as an equal into the so-called “civilized” Western family. Instead, the opposite happened. Russia was never treated as a partner, but as a subordinate. The West smiled, patted Moscow on the back, and invited it to summits while pushing its interests on Russia through raw force and pressure.
1:17

🇷🇺 “There’s no civilization in the West at all. There’s only degradation—everything, through and through.” Putin reflects on the early post-Soviet years, when Russia genuinely believed it would be welcomed as an equal into the so-called “civilized” Western family. Instead, the opposite happened. Russia was never treated as a partner, but as a subordinate. The West smiled, patted Moscow on the back, and invited it to summits while pushing its interests on Russia through raw force and pressure.

DD Geopolitics

104,543 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Putin called European politicians “pigs” who wanted to “feast on the collapse of Russia.” He also said that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had believed it would become an “equal part of the European family,” but that never happened because there is “no civilization in Europe, only total degradation.”
0:26

Putin called European politicians “pigs” who wanted to “feast on the collapse of Russia.” He also said that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had believed it would become an “equal part of the European family,” but that never happened because there is “no civilization in Europe, only total degradation.”

Visegrád 24

98,298 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Putin: "Immediately after collapse of the Soviet Union, it seemed to us that we would quickly become members of the so-called civilized family of European nations. Today it turns out there is no civilization there, only complete degeneracy."
0:28

Putin: "Immediately after collapse of the Soviet Union, it seemed to us that we would quickly become members of the so-called civilized family of European nations. Today it turns out there is no civilization there, only complete degeneracy."

Margarita Simonyan

476,305 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Russian Duma speaker Vyacheslav Volodin blamed Gorbachev for the collapse of the USSR, saying it was a mistake not to fire him after he received the Nobel Peace Prize. Anything related to “nobel” or “peace” seems to be ALWAYS hated in Russia. It’s worth remembering that Gorbachev apologized for many of the crimes committed by the Soviet Union and declassified documents that had been kept secret for decades. Those records proved that it was Moscow that carried out the Katyn massacre, which the USSR had long blamed on the Nazis. That period was a brief glimpse of hope for Russia to become a normal country but then Yeltsin came along.
0:47

Russian Duma speaker Vyacheslav Volodin blamed Gorbachev for the collapse of the USSR, saying it was a mistake not to fire him after he received the Nobel Peace Prize. Anything related to “nobel” or “peace” seems to be ALWAYS hated in Russia. It’s worth remembering that Gorbachev apologized for many of the crimes committed by the Soviet Union and declassified documents that had been kept secret for decades. Those records proved that it was Moscow that carried out the Katyn massacre, which the USSR had long blamed on the Nazis. That period was a brief glimpse of hope for Russia to become a normal country but then Yeltsin came along.

Victoria

122,432 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

SNYDER: When I was growing up in '70s and '80s, existence of Soviet Union was as certain as anything could be in politics. People who predicted the end of Soviet Union were outcasts and outliers. And up to December 1991, it was American policy to try to preserve Soviet Union. So it's really striking that all that's solid really can melt into air. The things that seem like absolute bedrocks, or even axioms of political thought, can cease to exist. Breakup of Soviet Union also means that 1990s in Russia happened faster there than here. Time goes faster there than in US. That means that things that are going to happen in US start to happen faster there, such as political postmodernism or return of a certain kind of fascism or oligarchy. So the end of Soviet Union shows that things can come to an end, but it also shows some of the possibilities of 21st-century politics which we then wade into ourselves later on.
1:22

SNYDER: When I was growing up in '70s and '80s, existence of Soviet Union was as certain as anything could be in politics. People who predicted the end of Soviet Union were outcasts and outliers. And up to December 1991, it was American policy to try to preserve Soviet Union. So it's really striking that all that's solid really can melt into air. The things that seem like absolute bedrocks, or even axioms of political thought, can cease to exist. Breakup of Soviet Union also means that 1990s in Russia happened faster there than here. Time goes faster there than in US. That means that things that are going to happen in US start to happen faster there, such as political postmodernism or return of a certain kind of fascism or oligarchy. So the end of Soviet Union shows that things can come to an end, but it also shows some of the possibilities of 21st-century politics which we then wade into ourselves later on.

Kate from Kharkiv

24,365 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

🚨Putin nucked Hiroshima.. 🚨Russia nucked Hiroshima.. 🚨Is this a joke? She make it looks like not USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima. 🤡Von der Leyen: Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. 🚨Putin Says The Western World's Order is not FREE. ‼️It is, HYPOCRITICAL and FULL of LIES. ‼️U.S. Was Only Nation to Use Nuclear Weapons in WW2 The U. S. Is the only nation in the world that used nuclear weapons twice destroying the towns of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let me remind you that together with the U. K. The U. S. World War two annihilate Dresden, hamburg and cologne and that there was no rationale behind that. There was no need to destroy. With air bombardment these great cities, they wanted to do that to intimidate the soviet union. That was their only goal. They left the west left a horrible history in Vietnam where they used napalm and other horrible tactics. Remember the Republic of Korea and their actions there, they keep are, there are various devices used to listen to them and spy on them. And the leaders of these countries tolerate all that and all of that is branded as transatlantic solidarity.
4:37

🚨Putin nucked Hiroshima.. 🚨Russia nucked Hiroshima.. 🚨Is this a joke? She make it looks like not USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima. 🤡Von der Leyen: Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. 🚨Putin Says The Western World's Order is not FREE. ‼️It is, HYPOCRITICAL and FULL of LIES. ‼️U.S. Was Only Nation to Use Nuclear Weapons in WW2 The U. S. Is the only nation in the world that used nuclear weapons twice destroying the towns of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let me remind you that together with the U. K. The U. S. World War two annihilate Dresden, hamburg and cologne and that there was no rationale behind that. There was no need to destroy. With air bombardment these great cities, they wanted to do that to intimidate the soviet union. That was their only goal. They left the west left a horrible history in Vietnam where they used napalm and other horrible tactics. Remember the Republic of Korea and their actions there, they keep are, there are various devices used to listen to them and spy on them. And the leaders of these countries tolerate all that and all of that is branded as transatlantic solidarity.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

162,667 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

🚨Putin nuked Hiroshima.. 🚨Russia nuked Hiroshima.. 🚨Is this a joke? Ursula make it looks like not USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima. 🤡Von der Leyen: Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. 🚨Putin Says The Western World's Order is not FREE. ‼️It is, HYPOCRITICAL and FULL of LIES. ‼️U.S. Was Only Nation to Use Nuclear Weapons in WW2 The U. S. Is the only nation in the world that used nuclear weapons twice destroying the towns of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let me remind you that together with the U. K. The U. S. World War two annihilate Dresden, hamburg and cologne and that there was no rationale behind that. There was no need to destroy. With air bombardment these great cities, they wanted to do that to intimidate the soviet union. That was their only goal. They left the west left a horrible history in Vietnam where they used napalm and other horrible tactics. Remember the Republic of Korea and their actions there, they keep are, there are various devices used to listen to them and spy on them. And the leaders of these countries tolerate all that and all of that is branded as transatlantic solidarity.
4:37

🚨Putin nuked Hiroshima.. 🚨Russia nuked Hiroshima.. 🚨Is this a joke? Ursula make it looks like not USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima. 🤡Von der Leyen: Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. 🚨Putin Says The Western World's Order is not FREE. ‼️It is, HYPOCRITICAL and FULL of LIES. ‼️U.S. Was Only Nation to Use Nuclear Weapons in WW2 The U. S. Is the only nation in the world that used nuclear weapons twice destroying the towns of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let me remind you that together with the U. K. The U. S. World War two annihilate Dresden, hamburg and cologne and that there was no rationale behind that. There was no need to destroy. With air bombardment these great cities, they wanted to do that to intimidate the soviet union. That was their only goal. They left the west left a horrible history in Vietnam where they used napalm and other horrible tactics. Remember the Republic of Korea and their actions there, they keep are, there are various devices used to listen to them and spy on them. And the leaders of these countries tolerate all that and all of that is branded as transatlantic solidarity.

THE ISLANDER

12,111 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Putin: This is a historic stage—difficult and fateful—for Russia. That is obvious. Today, this is understood not only by the deputies of the State Duma, members of the Russian government, the presidential administration, and regional leaders. Every ordinary citizen of the Russian Federation understands it as well. We are going through a period of struggle, and members of parliament represent their voters—that is, they represent the people of Russia.
0:37

Putin: This is a historic stage—difficult and fateful—for Russia. That is obvious. Today, this is understood not only by the deputies of the State Duma, members of the Russian government, the presidential administration, and regional leaders. Every ordinary citizen of the Russian Federation understands it as well. We are going through a period of struggle, and members of parliament represent their voters—that is, they represent the people of Russia.

Clash Report

27,689 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Today is Russia Day. For thirty years, we've been told the Cold War ended because communism collapsed. But if that were true, why did the confrontation continue? Russia abandoned communism and opened its economy. It sought partnership with the West and Putin even proposed joining NATO. But NATO's response was its expansion to Russia's borders. Yugoslavia was destroyed and was a rehearsal of what to do to Russia. Western-backed coups swept through former Soviet states. Sanctions became permanent policy. The boogeyman changed costumes but stayed in the script. First it was the Tsar, then the communists. Now it's Putin. Here's what actually threatens the West: a Russia that refuses to hand over its resources and its role as an independent civilization. That's the real crime, not the ideology. It's refusal to submit. Happy Russia Day. 🇷🇺
0:44

Today is Russia Day. For thirty years, we've been told the Cold War ended because communism collapsed. But if that were true, why did the confrontation continue? Russia abandoned communism and opened its economy. It sought partnership with the West and Putin even proposed joining NATO. But NATO's response was its expansion to Russia's borders. Yugoslavia was destroyed and was a rehearsal of what to do to Russia. Western-backed coups swept through former Soviet states. Sanctions became permanent policy. The boogeyman changed costumes but stayed in the script. First it was the Tsar, then the communists. Now it's Putin. Here's what actually threatens the West: a Russia that refuses to hand over its resources and its role as an independent civilization. That's the real crime, not the ideology. It's refusal to submit. Happy Russia Day. 🇷🇺

Rina Lu🇷🇺

13,651 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨INTERVIEW: “PUTIN’S RUSSIA CAN ONLY EXIST AS AN EMPIRE” "Putin really cares about history, specifically the history of the Russian Empire and its disintegration. Anyone who looks at the map of Russia realizes you can’t be the largest country in the world by being a nation-state. You can only achieve and control that size by being an empire. Only the British Empire was larger than today’s Russia. After 25 years in power, Putin is thinking about legacy, and for him that means making Russia great again, restoring historical territories and, in one form or another, control over what was the Russian Empire and then the Soviet Union. There is no other explanation for why he is so fascinated with history." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.
2:51

🚨INTERVIEW: “PUTIN’S RUSSIA CAN ONLY EXIST AS AN EMPIRE” "Putin really cares about history, specifically the history of the Russian Empire and its disintegration. Anyone who looks at the map of Russia realizes you can’t be the largest country in the world by being a nation-state. You can only achieve and control that size by being an empire. Only the British Empire was larger than today’s Russia. After 25 years in power, Putin is thinking about legacy, and for him that means making Russia great again, restoring historical territories and, in one form or another, control over what was the Russian Empire and then the Soviet Union. There is no other explanation for why he is so fascinated with history." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

46,627 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The tragedy of modern Russia. The tragedy of modern Russia is that its leaders have chosen to live in a distorted version of the past. Eminent historian, professor Karl Schlögel provides a devastating analysis of this collective breakdown, arguing that what we see in Ukraine is not a 'Great Patriotic' defense, but a barbaric regression. He reminds us that while other empires chose the painful path of decolonisation, putin’s Russia has surrendered to the 'dead end of empire’, trading its future for the systematic destruction of its neighbour. Professor Karl Schlögel: “It is a low point in the sense that it is not waging a war of defense—not the Great Patriotic War of '41 to '45—a defensive victory. Instead, it is waging a war of aggression that has now lasted longer than the German-Soviet War, involving moments of, well, barbarity, massacres, and war crimes of this nature. Specifically, aiming for the annihilation of a nation—denying Ukraine the right to its own existence and doing so by all means necessary—and the systematic destruction of the foundations of life in Ukraine: the bombardment of cities, the dismantling of cities, leaving cities vulnerable in winter to make them uninhabitable.” Interviewer: “But how do you explain such barbarity—you, who knows the country and its people?” “In my eyes, it is the surrender of the Russian leadership following the end of the Soviet Union. The failure to accept the end of the Soviet Union and to rebuild Russia anew; to lead Russia out of the dead end of empire and to follow the path taken by all great colonial empires—the British, French, Dutch, and so on. This challenge—to bid farewell to the empire and create a post-imperial, modern Russia that is commensurate with the strengths, talents, and the scale of this country—is what the Russian leadership surrendered to after the turbulent 1990s. In a certain way, putin initially represented the hope, the prospect, that there was now a capable man who would lead the country out of that dead end, but the opposite has happened.”
2:22

The tragedy of modern Russia. The tragedy of modern Russia is that its leaders have chosen to live in a distorted version of the past. Eminent historian, professor Karl Schlögel provides a devastating analysis of this collective breakdown, arguing that what we see in Ukraine is not a 'Great Patriotic' defense, but a barbaric regression. He reminds us that while other empires chose the painful path of decolonisation, putin’s Russia has surrendered to the 'dead end of empire’, trading its future for the systematic destruction of its neighbour. Professor Karl Schlögel: “It is a low point in the sense that it is not waging a war of defense—not the Great Patriotic War of '41 to '45—a defensive victory. Instead, it is waging a war of aggression that has now lasted longer than the German-Soviet War, involving moments of, well, barbarity, massacres, and war crimes of this nature. Specifically, aiming for the annihilation of a nation—denying Ukraine the right to its own existence and doing so by all means necessary—and the systematic destruction of the foundations of life in Ukraine: the bombardment of cities, the dismantling of cities, leaving cities vulnerable in winter to make them uninhabitable.” Interviewer: “But how do you explain such barbarity—you, who knows the country and its people?” “In my eyes, it is the surrender of the Russian leadership following the end of the Soviet Union. The failure to accept the end of the Soviet Union and to rebuild Russia anew; to lead Russia out of the dead end of empire and to follow the path taken by all great colonial empires—the British, French, Dutch, and so on. This challenge—to bid farewell to the empire and create a post-imperial, modern Russia that is commensurate with the strengths, talents, and the scale of this country—is what the Russian leadership surrendered to after the turbulent 1990s. In a certain way, putin initially represented the hope, the prospect, that there was now a capable man who would lead the country out of that dead end, but the opposite has happened.”

Yasmina

82,300 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Russian propagandist Solovyev said that "any war with Russia ends with a few obvious results - the partition of Poland and the fact that a Russian soldier ends up in the capital of a country that has decided to go to war with Russia." "No goodwill gestures. It was a bad idea for Khrushchev to make a goodwill gesture to Finland back then. And, to this day, we all are confronting the consequences of what Gorbachev did. And Yeltsin," he said.
0:59

Russian propagandist Solovyev said that "any war with Russia ends with a few obvious results - the partition of Poland and the fact that a Russian soldier ends up in the capital of a country that has decided to go to war with Russia." "No goodwill gestures. It was a bad idea for Khrushchev to make a goodwill gesture to Finland back then. And, to this day, we all are confronting the consequences of what Gorbachev did. And Yeltsin," he said.

Anton Gerashchenko

736,252 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Putin: In the western part of Ukraine, there are lands that Stalin gifted to Ukraine after WW2. Yes, it was Stalin who gifted those lands to Ukraine. But he gifted them within the framework of a single state. Apparently, it never occurred to him that a situation like today's could arise. By the way, I am sure that sooner or later, Ukraine will lose these western lands. What belonged to Poland, Hungary, and Romania will eventually, historically, return to its place. There was only one guarantor of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and that was Russia. But they found it necessary, possible, and beneficial for themselves to declare Russia their enemy
1:46

President Putin: In the western part of Ukraine, there are lands that Stalin gifted to Ukraine after WW2. Yes, it was Stalin who gifted those lands to Ukraine. But he gifted them within the framework of a single state. Apparently, it never occurred to him that a situation like today's could arise. By the way, I am sure that sooner or later, Ukraine will lose these western lands. What belonged to Poland, Hungary, and Romania will eventually, historically, return to its place. There was only one guarantor of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and that was Russia. But they found it necessary, possible, and beneficial for themselves to declare Russia their enemy

Open Source Intel

261,146 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"The West started the war in Ukraine" - Putin. The most interesting thing is that people believe this lie, and not only in Russia. That is why it is so important to counter propaganda and constantly repeat the facts: The war was started and is being waged by Putin and Russia.
1:09

"The West started the war in Ukraine" - Putin. The most interesting thing is that people believe this lie, and not only in Russia. That is why it is so important to counter propaganda and constantly repeat the facts: The war was started and is being waged by Putin and Russia.

Anton Gerashchenko

96,195 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨INTERVIEW: “RUSSIA’S POWER AMBITION DEPENDS ON REBUILDING THE SOVIET SPHERE - AND THAT PLAN NEEDS UKRAINE” "The Russian government, long before Putin, rejected the idea of a unipolar world that was emerging in the 1990s when the United States really ruled supreme on the world arena. To be a real pole in a multipolar world, Russia has to control the resources of what used to be the Soviet Union. Ukraine is the largest after Russia in terms of economic potential and so on and so forth, among the former Soviet republics. The entire model of Russia as one of the poles in a multipolar world wouldn’t work without control over Soviet resources, and without Ukraine, there would be a huge hole in that system. The war didn’t start in 2022. The war started in February 2014 with the Russian annexation of Crimea and the beginning of the war in Eastern Ukraine." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.
4:01

🚨INTERVIEW: “RUSSIA’S POWER AMBITION DEPENDS ON REBUILDING THE SOVIET SPHERE - AND THAT PLAN NEEDS UKRAINE” "The Russian government, long before Putin, rejected the idea of a unipolar world that was emerging in the 1990s when the United States really ruled supreme on the world arena. To be a real pole in a multipolar world, Russia has to control the resources of what used to be the Soviet Union. Ukraine is the largest after Russia in terms of economic potential and so on and so forth, among the former Soviet republics. The entire model of Russia as one of the poles in a multipolar world wouldn’t work without control over Soviet resources, and without Ukraine, there would be a huge hole in that system. The war didn’t start in 2022. The war started in February 2014 with the Russian annexation of Crimea and the beginning of the war in Eastern Ukraine." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

30,668 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🇷🇺 Putin reiterates that Russia repeatedly sought to join NATO, but was always rebuffed "We discussed a membership first of the USSR, then of Russia in NATO, but we were not welcome there" Putin added that Moscow was told the alliance would not expand — a pledge that was later broken
0:41

🇷🇺 Putin reiterates that Russia repeatedly sought to join NATO, but was always rebuffed "We discussed a membership first of the USSR, then of Russia in NATO, but we were not welcome there" Putin added that Moscow was told the alliance would not expand — a pledge that was later broken

The Other Side Media

94,581 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"Two days after the election in 2016, I was called up on the NSA phone. The person said I had to be on the intelligence community assessment that was assembling to finalize the Russia narrative. because we were going to prove that Trump was a Russian asset, and we were going to delay or block the inauguration of Donald J. Trump for the first term. I just couldn't believe it. This is what I was told on the phone. So, this was a deep state coup from the beginning that actually started in early 2016. We went through the process in November, December. The final product came out in the first few days of January, 2017. But bottom line - [in] the supposed Top Secret Review, there was nothing there to show that Russia was trying to manipulate the campaign or the outcome of the election in the favor of Donald J Trump, that the Trump campaign was somehow colluding with Russia. There was no evidence of anything," says Col. (Ret.) John Mills. He served as the Director for Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
4:25

"Two days after the election in 2016, I was called up on the NSA phone. The person said I had to be on the intelligence community assessment that was assembling to finalize the Russia narrative. because we were going to prove that Trump was a Russian asset, and we were going to delay or block the inauguration of Donald J. Trump for the first term. I just couldn't believe it. This is what I was told on the phone. So, this was a deep state coup from the beginning that actually started in early 2016. We went through the process in November, December. The final product came out in the first few days of January, 2017. But bottom line - [in] the supposed Top Secret Review, there was nothing there to show that Russia was trying to manipulate the campaign or the outcome of the election in the favor of Donald J Trump, that the Trump campaign was somehow colluding with Russia. There was no evidence of anything," says Col. (Ret.) John Mills. He served as the Director for Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Jan Jekielek

617,153 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr