正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🇷🇺🇺🇦 Putin may be approaching the one decision that could destroy him: drafting the sons of ordinary Russians. For more than three years, he's managed to wage a brutal war without forcing most Russians to personally bear its cost. Instead of mass mobilisation, he built a system around money....

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,826,294 subscribers

277,985 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治财经
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Mobile internet in Russia is becoming increasingly restricted. This is happening even in major cities - Moscow and Saint Petersburg. Social media platforms are being shut down, and Telegram is being slowed. Russians are being pushed onto the state-controlled platform MAX, which is under full government control. Why is the Kremlin lowering an iron curtain now? There are no mass protests, the opposition is silent, and everything remains strictly controlled. One possible reason why Russia is now building a digital concentration camp and restricting the internet is a future mobilization. Through the war in Iran, Russia has received extra oil revenue and feels more confident. But it understands that this situation may change. Russia also has no significant successes on the front. Each month, Ukrainians continue to kill increasing numbers of Russian soldiers. To replenish cannon fodder, it is highly likely that Putin may take the unpopular decision to start a mobilization. As a result, emigration sentiments are already increasing in Russia, because Russians have a fair sense that the iron curtain will be lowered completely. Europe must be extremely vigilant and strengthen border controls, as many Wagner mercenaries, FSB agents, and sleeper cells may attempt to enter. And in general, this rule always applies: the more oil money Russia has, the more it wants to wage war. 📹: Russians are making comical Reels about the lack of internet.
0:22

Mobile internet in Russia is becoming increasingly restricted. This is happening even in major cities - Moscow and Saint Petersburg. Social media platforms are being shut down, and Telegram is being slowed. Russians are being pushed onto the state-controlled platform MAX, which is under full government control. Why is the Kremlin lowering an iron curtain now? There are no mass protests, the opposition is silent, and everything remains strictly controlled. One possible reason why Russia is now building a digital concentration camp and restricting the internet is a future mobilization. Through the war in Iran, Russia has received extra oil revenue and feels more confident. But it understands that this situation may change. Russia also has no significant successes on the front. Each month, Ukrainians continue to kill increasing numbers of Russian soldiers. To replenish cannon fodder, it is highly likely that Putin may take the unpopular decision to start a mobilization. As a result, emigration sentiments are already increasing in Russia, because Russians have a fair sense that the iron curtain will be lowered completely. Europe must be extremely vigilant and strengthen border controls, as many Wagner mercenaries, FSB agents, and sleeper cells may attempt to enter. And in general, this rule always applies: the more oil money Russia has, the more it wants to wage war. 📹: Russians are making comical Reels about the lack of internet.

Anton Gerashchenko

778,948 次观看 • 5 个月前

"It's already a complete sh*tshow in Russia - actually, it's even worse": Russian Z-blogger Golman is preparing Russians for a "spectacular" autumn and advises them to stock up on salt, matches, and canned food, and to start digging potatoes. Watching ordinary Russians react to Ukrainian drone strikes spreading across Russia, I see that the "Russian stability" that existed in the minds of many Russians is starting to crack. Until now, most of them continued to live as if the war existed somewhere nearby but not in their daily lives. They watched it like a football match and cheered for their "team." For them, Putin was a figure who delivered victories, but not at the cost of their stable lives. Strikes on oil refineries are an instrument of economic coercion. But the fact that these strikes are also undermining the sense of normal life and creating a feeling of vulnerability among ordinary Russians has become an additional pleasant bonus - perhaps no less important than the economic strangulation of Russia. Elections have never been the source of Putin's power, while sustained ideological mobilization has remained the exception rather than the norm. Even the Crimean consensus of 2014 was a short-lived surge, not a new foundation for the regime. Putin's legitimacy rests on something else. It is built around the image of a guarantor of order - a leader who provides stability, predictability, and protection from chaos. This was the essence of the informal social contract of the 2000s: citizens gave up political participation in exchange for the right to live private lives. And in return for pride in Russia's illusory greatness, they are willing to tolerate poverty and humiliation at the hands of the system. This legitimacy is negative in nature. Putin is supported not because he is loved, but because he is associated with Russia’s greatness and the absence of catastrophe. He is seen as insurance against a return to the 1990s. The foundation of trust in Putin is the promise of order. The key expected phrases are "Everything is under control" and "Everything is going according to plan." People believe that Putin has a plan. Russians even accepted the de-occupation of Kherson and other Ukrainian territories because they were told it was not a retreat, but part of the plan. That is why the Russian system depends not so much on support for the war as on preserving the illusion of normality and control. This is why Ukrainian strikes on oil refineries, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and deep inside Russia matter far beyond the realm of military economics. The attacks demonstrate that the war is no longer "somewhere out there." It is reaching territories that the state has spent decades portraying as a secure rear, while simultaneously disrupting the comfortable lives of ordinary Russians. For the regime, this creates a dangerous risk. If it is unable to protect critical infrastructure, maintain the usual order, and guarantee predictability, its legitimacy begins to disappear. The cumulative effect of an economic crisis combined with the decline of Putin’s authority could ultimately bring down the Putin regime. The key thing is not to stop.
1:07

"It's already a complete sh*tshow in Russia - actually, it's even worse": Russian Z-blogger Golman is preparing Russians for a "spectacular" autumn and advises them to stock up on salt, matches, and canned food, and to start digging potatoes. Watching ordinary Russians react to Ukrainian drone strikes spreading across Russia, I see that the "Russian stability" that existed in the minds of many Russians is starting to crack. Until now, most of them continued to live as if the war existed somewhere nearby but not in their daily lives. They watched it like a football match and cheered for their "team." For them, Putin was a figure who delivered victories, but not at the cost of their stable lives. Strikes on oil refineries are an instrument of economic coercion. But the fact that these strikes are also undermining the sense of normal life and creating a feeling of vulnerability among ordinary Russians has become an additional pleasant bonus - perhaps no less important than the economic strangulation of Russia. Elections have never been the source of Putin's power, while sustained ideological mobilization has remained the exception rather than the norm. Even the Crimean consensus of 2014 was a short-lived surge, not a new foundation for the regime. Putin's legitimacy rests on something else. It is built around the image of a guarantor of order - a leader who provides stability, predictability, and protection from chaos. This was the essence of the informal social contract of the 2000s: citizens gave up political participation in exchange for the right to live private lives. And in return for pride in Russia's illusory greatness, they are willing to tolerate poverty and humiliation at the hands of the system. This legitimacy is negative in nature. Putin is supported not because he is loved, but because he is associated with Russia’s greatness and the absence of catastrophe. He is seen as insurance against a return to the 1990s. The foundation of trust in Putin is the promise of order. The key expected phrases are "Everything is under control" and "Everything is going according to plan." People believe that Putin has a plan. Russians even accepted the de-occupation of Kherson and other Ukrainian territories because they were told it was not a retreat, but part of the plan. That is why the Russian system depends not so much on support for the war as on preserving the illusion of normality and control. This is why Ukrainian strikes on oil refineries, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and deep inside Russia matter far beyond the realm of military economics. The attacks demonstrate that the war is no longer "somewhere out there." It is reaching territories that the state has spent decades portraying as a secure rear, while simultaneously disrupting the comfortable lives of ordinary Russians. For the regime, this creates a dangerous risk. If it is unable to protect critical infrastructure, maintain the usual order, and guarantee predictability, its legitimacy begins to disappear. The cumulative effect of an economic crisis combined with the decline of Putin’s authority could ultimately bring down the Putin regime. The key thing is not to stop.

Anton Gerashchenko

47,302 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇦🇷🇺 ZELENSKYY SAYS RUSSIA IS WALKING INTO A CRISIS OF ITS OWN MAKING “Russia is going to hit a real crisis due to its own stupidity. We've been saying for a long time that it's up to the Russians to end this war. Ukraine has suggested all possible formats for real negotiations, for guaranteeing security, and for a respectful peace. The only one who needs to make a decision is the Russian leader, Putin, who doesn't even get all the real statistics about what is actually happening” - Volodymyr Zelenskyy 🇺🇦 That is the trap Putin built for himself: a war he refuses to end, a system too afraid to tell him the truth, and a country paying the price for one man’s fantasy. Ukraine has offered formats for peace. Russia keeps choosing denial. At some point, reality stops asking politely.
0:28

🇺🇦🇷🇺 ZELENSKYY SAYS RUSSIA IS WALKING INTO A CRISIS OF ITS OWN MAKING “Russia is going to hit a real crisis due to its own stupidity. We've been saying for a long time that it's up to the Russians to end this war. Ukraine has suggested all possible formats for real negotiations, for guaranteeing security, and for a respectful peace. The only one who needs to make a decision is the Russian leader, Putin, who doesn't even get all the real statistics about what is actually happening” - Volodymyr Zelenskyy 🇺🇦 That is the trap Putin built for himself: a war he refuses to end, a system too afraid to tell him the truth, and a country paying the price for one man’s fantasy. Ukraine has offered formats for peace. Russia keeps choosing denial. At some point, reality stops asking politely.

WW3finalboss

13,782 次观看 • 2 个月前

"A ceasefire in Ukraine is possible, but achieving it will be very difficult because Putin needs a victory." - President Zelenskyy Key statements by Volodymyr Zelenskyy in an interview with BFMTV: ▪️ "Russians have lost the initiative on the battlefield. Since the beginning of the year, Russians advanced, slowly, then it was our turn. Russia lost 150,000 men for 50 kilometers. That's what real war is." ▪️ "It is true that Russia has powerful ballistic missiles and that they have, or will soon have, the capability to strike targets 5,000 kilometers away. It's just a matter of time." ▪️ "Russia has missiles that can hit any European city. That's why Europe needs its own anti-ballistic missile defense." ▪️ "We need to end this war. But to save people's lives, the first step is a ceasefire. But Russia does not want that. Because Putin needs a victory. For him, victory means the occupation of Ukraine. But he has realized that he cannot achieve it, at least for now." ▪️ "So what victory can Putin offer his society? This is where he becomes very dangerous. Not only for us. There could be an escalation. It could mean a war in another direction. He will try to occupy another place, subjugate other people. And kill again. Whether NATO is involved or not is not the point. The point is to draw more countries into the war. That is something he could do."
2:22

"A ceasefire in Ukraine is possible, but achieving it will be very difficult because Putin needs a victory." - President Zelenskyy Key statements by Volodymyr Zelenskyy in an interview with BFMTV: ▪️ "Russians have lost the initiative on the battlefield. Since the beginning of the year, Russians advanced, slowly, then it was our turn. Russia lost 150,000 men for 50 kilometers. That's what real war is." ▪️ "It is true that Russia has powerful ballistic missiles and that they have, or will soon have, the capability to strike targets 5,000 kilometers away. It's just a matter of time." ▪️ "Russia has missiles that can hit any European city. That's why Europe needs its own anti-ballistic missile defense." ▪️ "We need to end this war. But to save people's lives, the first step is a ceasefire. But Russia does not want that. Because Putin needs a victory. For him, victory means the occupation of Ukraine. But he has realized that he cannot achieve it, at least for now." ▪️ "So what victory can Putin offer his society? This is where he becomes very dangerous. Not only for us. There could be an escalation. It could mean a war in another direction. He will try to occupy another place, subjugate other people. And kill again. Whether NATO is involved or not is not the point. The point is to draw more countries into the war. That is something he could do."

Anton Gerashchenko

56,503 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 SEC. RUBIO: “UKRAINE HAS PUSHED RUSSIA BACK, BUT THIS IS NOW A WAR OF ATTRITION” Secretary of State Rubio reflected on Ukraine’s hard-fought gains and the brutal cost of the ongoing conflict, warning that the war has shifted into a devastating stalemate: “What people forget, Sean, is that at some point in this war, Russia controlled substantially more territory in Ukraine than they do now. If you look at the map from March or April after the invasion, or even May, compared to now, the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians way back from where they were. They’ve already achieved tremendous things because of their bravery, their courage, and how hard they’ve fought. But the reality is this has now become a war of attrition. And sadly, the Russians have shown their willingness to sacrifice 7,000 soldiers a week in an effort to achieve this. Putin said a couple of weeks ago it may take longer and cost more than they want, but they will get it done. That’s their mentality, and what we’re trying to see now is whether it’s possible to end the war in a way that protects Ukraine’s future.” Source: Sean Hannity 🇺🇸
1:25

🇺🇸 SEC. RUBIO: “UKRAINE HAS PUSHED RUSSIA BACK, BUT THIS IS NOW A WAR OF ATTRITION” Secretary of State Rubio reflected on Ukraine’s hard-fought gains and the brutal cost of the ongoing conflict, warning that the war has shifted into a devastating stalemate: “What people forget, Sean, is that at some point in this war, Russia controlled substantially more territory in Ukraine than they do now. If you look at the map from March or April after the invasion, or even May, compared to now, the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians way back from where they were. They’ve already achieved tremendous things because of their bravery, their courage, and how hard they’ve fought. But the reality is this has now become a war of attrition. And sadly, the Russians have shown their willingness to sacrifice 7,000 soldiers a week in an effort to achieve this. Putin said a couple of weeks ago it may take longer and cost more than they want, but they will get it done. That’s their mentality, and what we’re trying to see now is whether it’s possible to end the war in a way that protects Ukraine’s future.” Source: Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

Mario Nawfal

78,676 次观看 • 9 个月前

"Kyiv is the historical Russian capital" – a history lesson from NATO commander, French Admiral Vandier. "The war in Ukraine is an existential war for Russians. It's existential for Ukrainians, but it's also existential for Russians. Kyiv is the historical Russian capital. Kyiv was the center of Slavic Orthodoxy. And so today we can say that the war in Ukraine is a civil war between Slavs, and it's a war of identity. In a sense, it's almost a religious war, similar to those Europe has experienced in its history. Russia has become a true military-industrial power. It produces more military equipment than it loses. Moreover, it produces significantly more than it did at the beginning of the war."
0:31

"Kyiv is the historical Russian capital" – a history lesson from NATO commander, French Admiral Vandier. "The war in Ukraine is an existential war for Russians. It's existential for Ukrainians, but it's also existential for Russians. Kyiv is the historical Russian capital. Kyiv was the center of Slavic Orthodoxy. And so today we can say that the war in Ukraine is a civil war between Slavs, and it's a war of identity. In a sense, it's almost a religious war, similar to those Europe has experienced in its history. Russia has become a true military-industrial power. It produces more military equipment than it loses. Moreover, it produces significantly more than it did at the beginning of the war."

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

15,144 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨Tucker Carlson Warning “It Could Lead to NUCLEAR WAR.” 🇷🇺 West’s delusion that it can control Russia by force is long-standing Those in the West making the decisions regarding the proxy war in Ukraine have wanted an open war with Russia “since day one,” says Tucker Carlson. “They expect that they'll win somehow. Of course, they won't,” he notes. “There is something about Russia and the idea that outside powers can conquer it, take its resources or something, prevent it from becoming a global power that is very alluring to Western leaders. But there is zero track record of success,” Carlson says, warning that “It could lead to nuclear war.” But in the war ongoing against Russia has deteriorated to the point that the Russians are considering using nuclear weapon. And so we've done everything we could by calling people to find out, is that true? And it's hard to know exactly if that's true. But here's the way to think about it. So the war in Russia, despite getting almost no attention in American media, is not only ongoing, but it's accelerating. That's the first thing to know. And it's accelerating because NATO, the United States, and the Western European powers are hitting targets, including civilian targets and energy targets, deep within mainland Russia. And that would include a school, killing people on beaches with drones, hitting the Kremlin itself multiple times in drone attacks. So that's becoming more intense. Public opinion in Russia clearly is moving in a more bellicose direction. There are elections underway in Russia right now, which end September 20th, the Duma elections, the lawmakers' elections. And it's very clear that more and more Russians, and it's hard to quantify this precisely, but are surprised and dismayed that their government is allowing attacks, not by Ukraine, but by Ukraine sponsors, NATO and the United States, against Russia. And it's not destroying the Russian economy, we haven't been able to do that, but it is hurting the Russian economy, and of course, it is a threat to ordinary Russians. 🚨People are getting killed on beaches by drone attacks paid for by the United States or NATO. And if those attacks are being targeted with coordinates given to the Ukrainians by the CIA, and that's exactly what's happening, then your average Russian is beginning to wonder, "Why aren't we doing anything about this?" And so there is mounting pressure on the leadership of that country, Vladimir Putin, who despite American and Western propaganda, is not an absolute totalitarian dictator, which is to say he can't make any decision he wants. He is subject to the opinions, influenced by the opinions of all kinds of different power centers within that country, including public opinion. So the point is, pressure is mounting on Putin to do something to stop these attacks on Russia. And of course, the people mounting the attacks, paying for them, it's not the Ukrainians, by the way, there is no real Ukraine anymore. Its population has been decimated in this war. The big decisions are made by outside powers..Ukraine has no sovereignty, unfortunately for Ukraine. But the, the people who are making the decisions, and that would include the CIA in the United States, the NSA in the United States, the heads of state of Great Britain and France and Germany and basically the rest of the West, those people clearly understand that we're moving toward some sort of more open conflict with Russia. And that's kind of the point. Push Russia to do something radical against the West, blow up Kiev, for example, the Ukrainian capital, hit Poland, maybe even lob some kind of weapon into Western Europe. And at that point, you get what they've wanted since day one, which is an open war with Russia that they expect that they'll win somehow. Which of course they won't. But the delusion that Western powers can control Russia by force is longstanding.
5:26

🚨Tucker Carlson Warning “It Could Lead to NUCLEAR WAR.” 🇷🇺 West’s delusion that it can control Russia by force is long-standing Those in the West making the decisions regarding the proxy war in Ukraine have wanted an open war with Russia “since day one,” says Tucker Carlson. “They expect that they'll win somehow. Of course, they won't,” he notes. “There is something about Russia and the idea that outside powers can conquer it, take its resources or something, prevent it from becoming a global power that is very alluring to Western leaders. But there is zero track record of success,” Carlson says, warning that “It could lead to nuclear war.” But in the war ongoing against Russia has deteriorated to the point that the Russians are considering using nuclear weapon. And so we've done everything we could by calling people to find out, is that true? And it's hard to know exactly if that's true. But here's the way to think about it. So the war in Russia, despite getting almost no attention in American media, is not only ongoing, but it's accelerating. That's the first thing to know. And it's accelerating because NATO, the United States, and the Western European powers are hitting targets, including civilian targets and energy targets, deep within mainland Russia. And that would include a school, killing people on beaches with drones, hitting the Kremlin itself multiple times in drone attacks. So that's becoming more intense. Public opinion in Russia clearly is moving in a more bellicose direction. There are elections underway in Russia right now, which end September 20th, the Duma elections, the lawmakers' elections. And it's very clear that more and more Russians, and it's hard to quantify this precisely, but are surprised and dismayed that their government is allowing attacks, not by Ukraine, but by Ukraine sponsors, NATO and the United States, against Russia. And it's not destroying the Russian economy, we haven't been able to do that, but it is hurting the Russian economy, and of course, it is a threat to ordinary Russians. 🚨People are getting killed on beaches by drone attacks paid for by the United States or NATO. And if those attacks are being targeted with coordinates given to the Ukrainians by the CIA, and that's exactly what's happening, then your average Russian is beginning to wonder, "Why aren't we doing anything about this?" And so there is mounting pressure on the leadership of that country, Vladimir Putin, who despite American and Western propaganda, is not an absolute totalitarian dictator, which is to say he can't make any decision he wants. He is subject to the opinions, influenced by the opinions of all kinds of different power centers within that country, including public opinion. So the point is, pressure is mounting on Putin to do something to stop these attacks on Russia. And of course, the people mounting the attacks, paying for them, it's not the Ukrainians, by the way, there is no real Ukraine anymore. Its population has been decimated in this war. The big decisions are made by outside powers..Ukraine has no sovereignty, unfortunately for Ukraine. But the, the people who are making the decisions, and that would include the CIA in the United States, the NSA in the United States, the heads of state of Great Britain and France and Germany and basically the rest of the West, those people clearly understand that we're moving toward some sort of more open conflict with Russia. And that's kind of the point. Push Russia to do something radical against the West, blow up Kiev, for example, the Ukrainian capital, hit Poland, maybe even lob some kind of weapon into Western Europe. And at that point, you get what they've wanted since day one, which is an open war with Russia that they expect that they'll win somehow. Which of course they won't. But the delusion that Western powers can control Russia by force is longstanding.

THE ISLANDER

13,447 次观看 • 1 天前

🚨Colonel Douglas Macgregor explains why the globalists are hell bent on destroying Russia and replacing Putin: 🚨"Their agenda is to destroy Russia. Why? They would like to replace Putin because Putin presides over the last major power in Europe that has a national identity, a national language, a national culture that rests on the foundation of orthodox Christianity. That makes Russia the enemy of the globalists. What have the globalists done to us? 🚨They flooded our countries with non Europeans with a specific goal of diluting us, destroying our national identity, eliminating our culture. Expunging any remaining power that Christianity may wield culturally inside the west and they want to do that to Russia. 🚨They want to do that to Russia because Russia has enormous resources, mineral, agricultural, oil, gas and rare metals. If you can remove Putin, you can strip of its resources and enrich yourselves. That's why Russia has to go. Russia is holding out."
2:06

🚨Colonel Douglas Macgregor explains why the globalists are hell bent on destroying Russia and replacing Putin: 🚨"Their agenda is to destroy Russia. Why? They would like to replace Putin because Putin presides over the last major power in Europe that has a national identity, a national language, a national culture that rests on the foundation of orthodox Christianity. That makes Russia the enemy of the globalists. What have the globalists done to us? 🚨They flooded our countries with non Europeans with a specific goal of diluting us, destroying our national identity, eliminating our culture. Expunging any remaining power that Christianity may wield culturally inside the west and they want to do that to Russia. 🚨They want to do that to Russia because Russia has enormous resources, mineral, agricultural, oil, gas and rare metals. If you can remove Putin, you can strip of its resources and enrich yourselves. That's why Russia has to go. Russia is holding out."

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

226,211 次观看 • 10 天前

Putin wants to destroy Ukraine. Nothing has changed. ◾️ Basically, Putin has withdrawn from negotiations; ◾️ Putin is preparing for a summer military campaign, and he believes he can significantly improve Russia's military position; ◾️ Putin is not going to end the war; ◾️ Putin does not believe that Trump will make him stop and push Russia out of the oil market. Putin's statements yesterday about how he will crush Ukraine and put it under external governance under the UN management are his new fantasies. Russia will soon be spreading the narrative that the Ukrainian government is illegitimate and that it does not control the army. Also, the narrative that Ukraine is a terrorist country is being spread. It's all a lie, of course. But a lot of money has been invested in it. This new wave of information warfare is already underway. We must realize that, in fact, we have entered a new cycle of war. The Ukraine-EU-United States negotiations are important now.
0:25

Putin wants to destroy Ukraine. Nothing has changed. ◾️ Basically, Putin has withdrawn from negotiations; ◾️ Putin is preparing for a summer military campaign, and he believes he can significantly improve Russia's military position; ◾️ Putin is not going to end the war; ◾️ Putin does not believe that Trump will make him stop and push Russia out of the oil market. Putin's statements yesterday about how he will crush Ukraine and put it under external governance under the UN management are his new fantasies. Russia will soon be spreading the narrative that the Ukrainian government is illegitimate and that it does not control the army. Also, the narrative that Ukraine is a terrorist country is being spread. It's all a lie, of course. But a lot of money has been invested in it. This new wave of information warfare is already underway. We must realize that, in fact, we have entered a new cycle of war. The Ukraine-EU-United States negotiations are important now.

Anton Gerashchenko

321,659 次观看 • 1 年前

Russian propagandist Simonyan talks about the great sacred war that is not being fought against Ukraine. Take a listen. Putin and his inner circle have stopped talking about peace and negotiations and are raising the stakes. They speak of a "great and sacred war" against Europe and NATO. Why is this happening? It is a consequence of Russia’s failures on the Ukrainian front, where Russians are not advancing and are losing more and more soldiers - over 35,000 every month, more than they recruit - while Ukrainians are expanding the kill zone. It is the growing economic problems and the realization that Russia is heading toward collapse. It is the realization that everyone involved in the war will be punished after it ends, which means they cannot allow the war to end. Putin’s inner circle is aware of this dead-end situation. But Putin himself does not know the real picture, because people are afraid to tell him the truth. Therefore, Putin is convinced that he is winning the war. In addition, he sees that the United States is currently focused on the war in Iran and is no longer reacting to massive attacks on Ukraine and hybrid attacks in Europe. By the way, it is quite possible that the latest attack on Kyiv was organized personally for Putin - to give him the satisfaction of seeing Kyiv burning, especially after the humiliating May 9 parade in Moscow - but in reality, this attack achieved no military objectives and was a waste of millions. In this situation, with no real military successes in Ukraine, Putin’s inner circle, out of fear, may develop a desire to continue the war in a new direction - for example against the Baltic states - so that Putin stops asking about Donbas and Mala Tokmachka. The greater the defeat, the higher the stakes.
0:37

Russian propagandist Simonyan talks about the great sacred war that is not being fought against Ukraine. Take a listen. Putin and his inner circle have stopped talking about peace and negotiations and are raising the stakes. They speak of a "great and sacred war" against Europe and NATO. Why is this happening? It is a consequence of Russia’s failures on the Ukrainian front, where Russians are not advancing and are losing more and more soldiers - over 35,000 every month, more than they recruit - while Ukrainians are expanding the kill zone. It is the growing economic problems and the realization that Russia is heading toward collapse. It is the realization that everyone involved in the war will be punished after it ends, which means they cannot allow the war to end. Putin’s inner circle is aware of this dead-end situation. But Putin himself does not know the real picture, because people are afraid to tell him the truth. Therefore, Putin is convinced that he is winning the war. In addition, he sees that the United States is currently focused on the war in Iran and is no longer reacting to massive attacks on Ukraine and hybrid attacks in Europe. By the way, it is quite possible that the latest attack on Kyiv was organized personally for Putin - to give him the satisfaction of seeing Kyiv burning, especially after the humiliating May 9 parade in Moscow - but in reality, this attack achieved no military objectives and was a waste of millions. In this situation, with no real military successes in Ukraine, Putin’s inner circle, out of fear, may develop a desire to continue the war in a new direction - for example against the Baltic states - so that Putin stops asking about Donbas and Mala Tokmachka. The greater the defeat, the higher the stakes.

Anton Gerashchenko

403,434 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "PUTIN'S WAGING WAR FOR HIS LIFE, NOT JUST CRIMEA" Paul Warburg suggested that Putin hasn't been silencing political opponents as a ruthless means of getting his way, or even protecting his position of power. The Kremlin is an unforgiving machine, and leaders who come to be known as failures can expect the kind of severances that get delivered with something far worse than a check. The ruthless dynamics of Russian politics? Paul Warburg believes that it could force the war to spiral disastrously. "It's existential for him personally. He has to achieve a goal that he feels he can sell with the Russian people. Right now, that goal is to take all of the Donbas. Why do you think he's been eliminating so much of the opposition at the higher echelons of Russian society? It's because he's very afraid. If the oligarchs unite against him, he could actually lose his grip on power more quickly than a lot of people realize."
3:05

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "PUTIN'S WAGING WAR FOR HIS LIFE, NOT JUST CRIMEA" Paul Warburg suggested that Putin hasn't been silencing political opponents as a ruthless means of getting his way, or even protecting his position of power. The Kremlin is an unforgiving machine, and leaders who come to be known as failures can expect the kind of severances that get delivered with something far worse than a check. The ruthless dynamics of Russian politics? Paul Warburg believes that it could force the war to spiral disastrously. "It's existential for him personally. He has to achieve a goal that he feels he can sell with the Russian people. Right now, that goal is to take all of the Donbas. Why do you think he's been eliminating so much of the opposition at the higher echelons of Russian society? It's because he's very afraid. If the oligarchs unite against him, he could actually lose his grip on power more quickly than a lot of people realize."

Mario Nawfal

17,858 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Listen to the nonsense Putin spouts, observing his language and maintaining a skeptical and critical mindset, and see that this man is simply insane." Russian officials and propaganda are constantly trying to convince their citizens that Moscow is at war with the entire NATO. But, as Russian political analyst Dmitry Oreshkin points out, NATO has no losses, while Russia has lost more than a million people and thousands of pieces of equipment.
1:00

"Listen to the nonsense Putin spouts, observing his language and maintaining a skeptical and critical mindset, and see that this man is simply insane." Russian officials and propaganda are constantly trying to convince their citizens that Moscow is at war with the entire NATO. But, as Russian political analyst Dmitry Oreshkin points out, NATO has no losses, while Russia has lost more than a million people and thousands of pieces of equipment.

Anton Gerashchenko

53,119 次观看 • 10 个月前

🇺🇸🇷🇺 The real danger may begin when Putin stops being the brake. Geopolitics analyst Brandon Weichert warns that Russia’s military leadership is pushing for a much harder response, while Putin is still holding back some of Moscow’s most destructive options in hopes of forcing a diplomatic solution. “Putin has been holding back the most destructive elements. I think he’s trying to hold out to see if he can get an actual diplomatic solution.” He says the pressure around Putin is moving in the opposite direction: generals, hardliners, and a wounded Russian public are telling him to go harder. That is the part Washington keeps missing. If Putin decides restraint is no longer useful, the war does not just escalate. It changes character overnight. Brandon Weichert
1:18

🇺🇸🇷🇺 The real danger may begin when Putin stops being the brake. Geopolitics analyst Brandon Weichert warns that Russia’s military leadership is pushing for a much harder response, while Putin is still holding back some of Moscow’s most destructive options in hopes of forcing a diplomatic solution. “Putin has been holding back the most destructive elements. I think he’s trying to hold out to see if he can get an actual diplomatic solution.” He says the pressure around Putin is moving in the opposite direction: generals, hardliners, and a wounded Russian public are telling him to go harder. That is the part Washington keeps missing. If Putin decides restraint is no longer useful, the war does not just escalate. It changes character overnight. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

64,271 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸🇺🇦 Keith Kellogg says Russia may believe it is winning the war, but the battlefield reality tells a different story: Ukraine continues to hold on, while Moscow is accumulating increasingly serious problems of its own. 🗣️ “Russia thinks it is winning. It isn’t,” Kellogg said, emphasizing Ukraine’s resilience and refusal to back down. He acknowledged the enormous pressure created by the harsh winter and Russia’s continuing attacks, but argued that Russia is facing considerably greater long-term difficulties. Kellogg has previously expressed confidence that Russia will not win the war, arguing that Ukraine’s position improves if it withstands the periods of greatest pressure. His message to Ukrainians was straightforward: endurance itself has become a strategic weapon. Russia continues to pay heavily for incremental territorial advances while Ukraine is expanding its ability to strike Russian military and economic infrastructure far behind the front. Kellogg’s assessment is essentially that Moscow’s strategy depends on Ukraine breaking first. If Ukraine remains standing and Western support continues, that assumption becomes increasingly difficult for the Kremlin to sustain. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:23

🇺🇸🇺🇦 Keith Kellogg says Russia may believe it is winning the war, but the battlefield reality tells a different story: Ukraine continues to hold on, while Moscow is accumulating increasingly serious problems of its own. 🗣️ “Russia thinks it is winning. It isn’t,” Kellogg said, emphasizing Ukraine’s resilience and refusal to back down. He acknowledged the enormous pressure created by the harsh winter and Russia’s continuing attacks, but argued that Russia is facing considerably greater long-term difficulties. Kellogg has previously expressed confidence that Russia will not win the war, arguing that Ukraine’s position improves if it withstands the periods of greatest pressure. His message to Ukrainians was straightforward: endurance itself has become a strategic weapon. Russia continues to pay heavily for incremental territorial advances while Ukraine is expanding its ability to strike Russian military and economic infrastructure far behind the front. Kellogg’s assessment is essentially that Moscow’s strategy depends on Ukraine breaking first. If Ukraine remains standing and Western support continues, that assumption becomes increasingly difficult for the Kremlin to sustain. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

13,435 次观看 • 6 天前

The tragedy of modern Russia. The tragedy of modern Russia is that its leaders have chosen to live in a distorted version of the past. Eminent historian, professor Karl Schlögel provides a devastating analysis of this collective breakdown, arguing that what we see in Ukraine is not a 'Great Patriotic' defense, but a barbaric regression. He reminds us that while other empires chose the painful path of decolonisation, putin’s Russia has surrendered to the 'dead end of empire’, trading its future for the systematic destruction of its neighbour. Professor Karl Schlögel: “It is a low point in the sense that it is not waging a war of defense—not the Great Patriotic War of '41 to '45—a defensive victory. Instead, it is waging a war of aggression that has now lasted longer than the German-Soviet War, involving moments of, well, barbarity, massacres, and war crimes of this nature. Specifically, aiming for the annihilation of a nation—denying Ukraine the right to its own existence and doing so by all means necessary—and the systematic destruction of the foundations of life in Ukraine: the bombardment of cities, the dismantling of cities, leaving cities vulnerable in winter to make them uninhabitable.” Interviewer: “But how do you explain such barbarity—you, who knows the country and its people?” “In my eyes, it is the surrender of the Russian leadership following the end of the Soviet Union. The failure to accept the end of the Soviet Union and to rebuild Russia anew; to lead Russia out of the dead end of empire and to follow the path taken by all great colonial empires—the British, French, Dutch, and so on. This challenge—to bid farewell to the empire and create a post-imperial, modern Russia that is commensurate with the strengths, talents, and the scale of this country—is what the Russian leadership surrendered to after the turbulent 1990s. In a certain way, putin initially represented the hope, the prospect, that there was now a capable man who would lead the country out of that dead end, but the opposite has happened.”
2:22

The tragedy of modern Russia. The tragedy of modern Russia is that its leaders have chosen to live in a distorted version of the past. Eminent historian, professor Karl Schlögel provides a devastating analysis of this collective breakdown, arguing that what we see in Ukraine is not a 'Great Patriotic' defense, but a barbaric regression. He reminds us that while other empires chose the painful path of decolonisation, putin’s Russia has surrendered to the 'dead end of empire’, trading its future for the systematic destruction of its neighbour. Professor Karl Schlögel: “It is a low point in the sense that it is not waging a war of defense—not the Great Patriotic War of '41 to '45—a defensive victory. Instead, it is waging a war of aggression that has now lasted longer than the German-Soviet War, involving moments of, well, barbarity, massacres, and war crimes of this nature. Specifically, aiming for the annihilation of a nation—denying Ukraine the right to its own existence and doing so by all means necessary—and the systematic destruction of the foundations of life in Ukraine: the bombardment of cities, the dismantling of cities, leaving cities vulnerable in winter to make them uninhabitable.” Interviewer: “But how do you explain such barbarity—you, who knows the country and its people?” “In my eyes, it is the surrender of the Russian leadership following the end of the Soviet Union. The failure to accept the end of the Soviet Union and to rebuild Russia anew; to lead Russia out of the dead end of empire and to follow the path taken by all great colonial empires—the British, French, Dutch, and so on. This challenge—to bid farewell to the empire and create a post-imperial, modern Russia that is commensurate with the strengths, talents, and the scale of this country—is what the Russian leadership surrendered to after the turbulent 1990s. In a certain way, putin initially represented the hope, the prospect, that there was now a capable man who would lead the country out of that dead end, but the opposite has happened.”

Yasmina

82,300 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇮🇷🇺🇦 What happens when a great power has no clear path to victory, but also no politically acceptable way to admit defeat? That may be the central problem facing Washington in Iran, according to Prof. Glenn Diesen. Diesen argues that Iran has effectively defeated the United States, but Tehran's demands for sanctions relief, unfrozen assets, reconstruction payments and an end to the wider regional wars create a dilemma for Washington: accepting those terms could be politically impossible, while refusing them risks trapping the U.S. in a war it has no obvious way to win. Trump may therefore try to declare victory and walk away, pointing to Iran's supposedly destroyed nuclear capabilities and arguing that the Strait of Hormuz is no longer strategically important. But Iran has leverage. Tehran can make an American withdrawal politically painful while maintaining enough pressure to prevent Washington from simply resetting the conflict and returning later. And this is where Diesen's warning matters. A great power pushed between humiliation and escalation may choose escalation. Iran therefore has to be careful not to push Trump so far that he concludes there is nothing left to lose. Meanwhile, the war is becoming harder to contain. Fighting is spreading through Yemen, with the Houthis striking Saudi-backed targets and reportedly hitting Saudi-linked shipping and infrastructure. Diesen argues that treating these groups simply as Iranian proxies misses the bigger problem: many have their own interests and conflicts that could continue even if Tehran wanted the war to end. The same applies to the emerging Middle Eastern security order. As confidence in permanent American protection declines, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and potentially Egypt are moving toward a new regional security architecture. Diesen sees two possible futures: competing blocs, where states seek security against one another, or an inclusive system that eventually brings Iran, and perhaps even Israel, into the same framework. The first creates another cycle of escalation. The second attempts to make security indivisible, so one country's security does not require another country's permanent insecurity. And then there is Ukraine. Diesen argues that the battlefield is increasingly becoming a war of attrition that Russia is slowly winning. Ukraine faces worsening manpower and ammunition problems, while a shortage of interceptor missiles is allowing Russia to use more air power and increasingly devastating glide bombs. Russia is also expanding attacks against Ukrainian logistics, ports, bridges, warehouses and energy infrastructure, while Ukraine continues striking deeper inside Russia to create pressure for negotiations. But if Moscow sees NATO expansion and Ukraine's role as a Western frontline as an existential threat, hurting Russia may not convince it to compromise. It may convince Russia that it has even more reason to continue fighting. Diesen's conclusion is bleak: both sides want the war to end, but they fundamentally disagree over what ending it means. For Russia, that means Ukrainian neutrality, territorial concessions and a political settlement. For Ukraine and its European backers, an unconditional ceasefire risks freezing the battlefield and giving Kyiv time to rebuild. So the wars in Iran and Ukraine are beginning to reveal the same dangerous pattern. The longer a conflict continues, the harder it becomes to separate victory from survival, and the harder it becomes for either side to back down without believing it is surrendering something existential. When the off-ramp disappears, escalation starts looking less like a choice and more like the only road left. Diesen's final warning was almost an afterthought: let's hope the conflict doesn't spread to Japan. He may have been joking. But these are not particularly reassuring times. Glenn Diesen
33:45

🇮🇷🇺🇦 What happens when a great power has no clear path to victory, but also no politically acceptable way to admit defeat? That may be the central problem facing Washington in Iran, according to Prof. Glenn Diesen. Diesen argues that Iran has effectively defeated the United States, but Tehran's demands for sanctions relief, unfrozen assets, reconstruction payments and an end to the wider regional wars create a dilemma for Washington: accepting those terms could be politically impossible, while refusing them risks trapping the U.S. in a war it has no obvious way to win. Trump may therefore try to declare victory and walk away, pointing to Iran's supposedly destroyed nuclear capabilities and arguing that the Strait of Hormuz is no longer strategically important. But Iran has leverage. Tehran can make an American withdrawal politically painful while maintaining enough pressure to prevent Washington from simply resetting the conflict and returning later. And this is where Diesen's warning matters. A great power pushed between humiliation and escalation may choose escalation. Iran therefore has to be careful not to push Trump so far that he concludes there is nothing left to lose. Meanwhile, the war is becoming harder to contain. Fighting is spreading through Yemen, with the Houthis striking Saudi-backed targets and reportedly hitting Saudi-linked shipping and infrastructure. Diesen argues that treating these groups simply as Iranian proxies misses the bigger problem: many have their own interests and conflicts that could continue even if Tehran wanted the war to end. The same applies to the emerging Middle Eastern security order. As confidence in permanent American protection declines, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and potentially Egypt are moving toward a new regional security architecture. Diesen sees two possible futures: competing blocs, where states seek security against one another, or an inclusive system that eventually brings Iran, and perhaps even Israel, into the same framework. The first creates another cycle of escalation. The second attempts to make security indivisible, so one country's security does not require another country's permanent insecurity. And then there is Ukraine. Diesen argues that the battlefield is increasingly becoming a war of attrition that Russia is slowly winning. Ukraine faces worsening manpower and ammunition problems, while a shortage of interceptor missiles is allowing Russia to use more air power and increasingly devastating glide bombs. Russia is also expanding attacks against Ukrainian logistics, ports, bridges, warehouses and energy infrastructure, while Ukraine continues striking deeper inside Russia to create pressure for negotiations. But if Moscow sees NATO expansion and Ukraine's role as a Western frontline as an existential threat, hurting Russia may not convince it to compromise. It may convince Russia that it has even more reason to continue fighting. Diesen's conclusion is bleak: both sides want the war to end, but they fundamentally disagree over what ending it means. For Russia, that means Ukrainian neutrality, territorial concessions and a political settlement. For Ukraine and its European backers, an unconditional ceasefire risks freezing the battlefield and giving Kyiv time to rebuild. So the wars in Iran and Ukraine are beginning to reveal the same dangerous pattern. The longer a conflict continues, the harder it becomes to separate victory from survival, and the harder it becomes for either side to back down without believing it is surrendering something existential. When the off-ramp disappears, escalation starts looking less like a choice and more like the only road left. Diesen's final warning was almost an afterthought: let's hope the conflict doesn't spread to Japan. He may have been joking. But these are not particularly reassuring times. Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

244,431 次观看 • 16 天前

A Russian historian says that during World War II the Germans fought much better than the Russians in all directions, but the Russians managed to achieve victory only at the cost of enormous bloodshed. A journalist tries to object that great wars cannot be won by meat and blood alone, but the historian insists that Russia had nothing else. He says that Russia shot one million soldiers at the front, surrendered three million soldiers into captivity, had 1–2 million political prisoners in prisons and just as many guards for them, and carried out mass executions during collectivization (the forced confiscation of peasants’ land and its transfer to the state). It is no wonder that documents of Soviet history are still classified in Russia. The world would be horrified to see the truth.
1:00

A Russian historian says that during World War II the Germans fought much better than the Russians in all directions, but the Russians managed to achieve victory only at the cost of enormous bloodshed. A journalist tries to object that great wars cannot be won by meat and blood alone, but the historian insists that Russia had nothing else. He says that Russia shot one million soldiers at the front, surrendered three million soldiers into captivity, had 1–2 million political prisoners in prisons and just as many guards for them, and carried out mass executions during collectivization (the forced confiscation of peasants’ land and its transfer to the state). It is no wonder that documents of Soviet history are still classified in Russia. The world would be horrified to see the truth.

Devana 🇺🇦

178,416 次观看 • 6 个月前

James Carden, former US State Department advisor on Russia, on Australian Sky News: "Ukraine's losses are 36 times higher than Russia's" - The whole story about the "Tomahawks" is nonsense. In the States, they say that Trump is not giving Zelensky weapons that could turn the tide of the war. But that's a lie and it's ridiculous. "Tomahawks" are no more capable of turning the tide of the war than all the other systems that have already failed to do so. The situation is the same as with HIMARS, which the Ukrainians begged for at one time. And with the Patriot SAMs, and ATACMS, and F-16s. Nothing has been able to turn the tide of the war. Essentially, it is lost. And the sooner the Ukrainians realize this, the better for them. In my opinion, Putin is offering a reasonable solution. Ukraine will not be able to join NATO, but it can join the EU. To me, that's a fair deal. - But they are also being asked for territorial concessions. - Correct. But they themselves have been attacking these territories since 2014. The Ukrainians are not entirely sincere. They say they want the eastern lands and Donbass, but without the ethnic Russians who live there. For the last 30 years, they have done everything to deny these people their rights. Let's be honest, Putin is in some sense offering them exactly what they want. Let Ukraine remain only for ethnic Ukrainians, and finally get rid of the ethnic Russians. It's not customary to say this out loud, but it's true. - When you say the war is lost, what about the information that Russia is literally on the brink right now? And that if pressure is applied, it will run out of money and won't be able to continue its brutal war indefinitely? - It's exactly the opposite. According to my data, the ratio of Ukrainian to Russian deaths is 36 to one. Ukraine is approaching a million losses. And what the mainstream media write, especially The New York Times and Washington Post, is as truthful as what the authorities told Americans about the Vietnam War. The war of attrition that Russia has been waging since 2022 is quite successful. In my view, it is Ukraine that is currently on the brink of disaster, not Russia. - Okay, James, we thank you for your time. James Carden – former US State Department advisor on Russia. Thank you.
3:21

James Carden, former US State Department advisor on Russia, on Australian Sky News: "Ukraine's losses are 36 times higher than Russia's" - The whole story about the "Tomahawks" is nonsense. In the States, they say that Trump is not giving Zelensky weapons that could turn the tide of the war. But that's a lie and it's ridiculous. "Tomahawks" are no more capable of turning the tide of the war than all the other systems that have already failed to do so. The situation is the same as with HIMARS, which the Ukrainians begged for at one time. And with the Patriot SAMs, and ATACMS, and F-16s. Nothing has been able to turn the tide of the war. Essentially, it is lost. And the sooner the Ukrainians realize this, the better for them. In my opinion, Putin is offering a reasonable solution. Ukraine will not be able to join NATO, but it can join the EU. To me, that's a fair deal. - But they are also being asked for territorial concessions. - Correct. But they themselves have been attacking these territories since 2014. The Ukrainians are not entirely sincere. They say they want the eastern lands and Donbass, but without the ethnic Russians who live there. For the last 30 years, they have done everything to deny these people their rights. Let's be honest, Putin is in some sense offering them exactly what they want. Let Ukraine remain only for ethnic Ukrainians, and finally get rid of the ethnic Russians. It's not customary to say this out loud, but it's true. - When you say the war is lost, what about the information that Russia is literally on the brink right now? And that if pressure is applied, it will run out of money and won't be able to continue its brutal war indefinitely? - It's exactly the opposite. According to my data, the ratio of Ukrainian to Russian deaths is 36 to one. Ukraine is approaching a million losses. And what the mainstream media write, especially The New York Times and Washington Post, is as truthful as what the authorities told Americans about the Vietnam War. The war of attrition that Russia has been waging since 2022 is quite successful. In my view, it is Ukraine that is currently on the brink of disaster, not Russia. - Okay, James, we thank you for your time. James Carden – former US State Department advisor on Russia. Thank you.

Sprinter Press

59,662 次观看 • 10 个月前

❗️ Putin’s Security Team Switched Off Cameras. The Kremlin Fears an Iranian-Style Scenario Russian security services temporarily disabled parts of the surveillance system used to protect Vladimir Putin, according to reports. The move was reportedly driven by concerns that the cameras could be exploited to track the Russian leader’s movements and those of his inner circle. The decision reflects growing anxiety inside the Kremlin. Yet Putin may have more reason to fear threats from within than from abroad. A significant part of Russia’s political and business elite is believed to favor ending the war, while the Kremlin leader continues to reject meaningful compromise. Russian history shows that prolonged wars and deepening elite frustration often end badly for those in power. If divisions inside the ruling class continue to grow, Putin could eventually face not only political isolation, but a direct challenge to his grip on power.
0:48

❗️ Putin’s Security Team Switched Off Cameras. The Kremlin Fears an Iranian-Style Scenario Russian security services temporarily disabled parts of the surveillance system used to protect Vladimir Putin, according to reports. The move was reportedly driven by concerns that the cameras could be exploited to track the Russian leader’s movements and those of his inner circle. The decision reflects growing anxiety inside the Kremlin. Yet Putin may have more reason to fear threats from within than from abroad. A significant part of Russia’s political and business elite is believed to favor ending the war, while the Kremlin leader continues to reject meaningful compromise. Russian history shows that prolonged wars and deepening elite frustration often end badly for those in power. If divisions inside the ruling class continue to grow, Putin could eventually face not only political isolation, but a direct challenge to his grip on power.

NEXTA

67,545 次观看 • 2 个月前