Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Q: When you say you want fair coverage, does that mean coverage that's more favorable to this president? Carr: Look, something has to change. Again, it's not just my perspective… If you're going to run a broadcast media operation, the FCC and congress, frankly, have decided you need to... operate in the public interest. That's one of the things we're pushing for, how do we reempower these broadcasters who serve the interests of their local communities? So much of this now is driven by the national programmers whether ABC, CBS is or NBC.. One of the things we’re trying to do at the FCC is how do we empower local, constrain the power of these national programmers so broadcasters can actually serve their local communities.show more

Acyn

730,709 subscribers

175,879 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr weighs in after ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel off the airwaves "Broadcasters are different from any other form of communication, including here on cable right now. Fox News doesn’t have an FCC license, CNN doesn’t, but ABC, CBS, and NBC—those broadcast stations do. And with that license comes a unique obligation to operate in the public interest. President Trump ran directly at these legacy broadcast outlets and exposed them to market forces, and a lot of these affiliate groups said, ‘We are tired of carrying this stuff.’ There’s more work to do, but I’m very glad to see that American broadcasters are standing up to serve the interests of their communities."

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr weighs in after ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel off the airwaves "Broadcasters are different from any other form of communication, including here on cable right now. Fox News doesn’t have an FCC license, CNN doesn’t, but ABC, CBS, and NBC—those broadcast stations do. And with that license comes a unique obligation to operate in the public interest. President Trump ran directly at these legacy broadcast outlets and exposed them to market forces, and a lot of these affiliate groups said, ‘We are tired of carrying this stuff.’ There’s more work to do, but I’m very glad to see that American broadcasters are standing up to serve the interests of their communities."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

1,243,654 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

BARTIROMO: What do you say to critics who say the FCC is crossing over into editorial decision making? BRENDAN CARR: There are some broadcasters out there that feel they are being censored by the FCC. There are broadcasters saying they're changing their coverage because of the agency. What we're really doing is restoring the FCC's enforcement of the public interest standard (Not that this is not a denial of ABC's allegation that the FCC is engaging in censorship ... )

BARTIROMO: What do you say to critics who say the FCC is crossing over into editorial decision making? BRENDAN CARR: There are some broadcasters out there that feel they are being censored by the FCC. There are broadcasters saying they're changing their coverage because of the agency. What we're really doing is restoring the FCC's enforcement of the public interest standard (Not that this is not a denial of ABC's allegation that the FCC is engaging in censorship ... )

Aaron Rupar

59,446 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Mullin: Will you commit today that the FCC will not use its licensing authority, enforcement role, or claims of news distortion to politically pressure or punish broadcasters for their editorial decisions? Carr: The FCC is going to enforce the public interest standard and the news distortion broadcast hoax rule, and those are the actions we’re going to take.

Mullin: Will you commit today that the FCC will not use its licensing authority, enforcement role, or claims of news distortion to politically pressure or punish broadcasters for their editorial decisions? Carr: The FCC is going to enforce the public interest standard and the news distortion broadcast hoax rule, and those are the actions we’re going to take.

Acyn

48,868 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Carr: They are now facing the consequences of the choices they have made to appeal to a very narrow audience. You can do that, you can start a podcast, but if you are going to have a license with the FCC, we expect you to broadly serve the public interest

Carr: They are now facing the consequences of the choices they have made to appeal to a very narrow audience. You can do that, you can start a podcast, but if you are going to have a license with the FCC, we expect you to broadly serve the public interest

Acyn

232,279 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Former FCC Chair Wheeler: An autocrat's favorite tool is a monopoly on telling the story. And if you can control the people who tell that story, then you've got an autocrat's greatest dream. What's happening now at the FCC is an effort to change the rules about who can own the right to use the public's airwaves to broadcast to Americans. Go back to the beginning of broadcasting — the 1934 Communications Act — whose founding principle was a diversity of voices and a diversity of ownership, so that the debate that is essential to democracy could take place. Over time, that has been whittled down to the point where only about 20% of America's “local” broadcast outlets are truly locally owned. What Chairman Carr announced was an initiative to change the rules to: 1.Allow a handful of broadcasters to have greater national reach that process, give them greater control locally. Let me give you a quick example. There is a merger that has already been agreed to — between Nexstar Media, the largest chain of broadcast outlets in the nation, and another chain by the name of Tegna. This merger is, per se, illegal today because it violates existing FCC rules on both national reach and local ownership. Yet the deal has been agreed to — and is now only awaiting the FCC to change the rules to make it legal. Brendan Carr has indicated an intention to do just that. And how do you make it legal? Well, you cut back on the diversity of voices. You cut back on the diversity of ownership. And you give it to corporations that have self-identified as being Trump-friendly.

Former FCC Chair Wheeler: An autocrat's favorite tool is a monopoly on telling the story. And if you can control the people who tell that story, then you've got an autocrat's greatest dream. What's happening now at the FCC is an effort to change the rules about who can own the right to use the public's airwaves to broadcast to Americans. Go back to the beginning of broadcasting — the 1934 Communications Act — whose founding principle was a diversity of voices and a diversity of ownership, so that the debate that is essential to democracy could take place. Over time, that has been whittled down to the point where only about 20% of America's “local” broadcast outlets are truly locally owned. What Chairman Carr announced was an initiative to change the rules to: 1.Allow a handful of broadcasters to have greater national reach that process, give them greater control locally. Let me give you a quick example. There is a merger that has already been agreed to — between Nexstar Media, the largest chain of broadcast outlets in the nation, and another chain by the name of Tegna. This merger is, per se, illegal today because it violates existing FCC rules on both national reach and local ownership. Yet the deal has been agreed to — and is now only awaiting the FCC to change the rules to make it legal. Brendan Carr has indicated an intention to do just that. And how do you make it legal? Well, you cut back on the diversity of voices. You cut back on the diversity of ownership. And you give it to corporations that have self-identified as being Trump-friendly.

Acyn

101,812 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr says Kimmel and Colbert are now facing the consequences of choosing to cater to a narrow, partisan audience. “You can do that, you can start a podcast, you can go on YouTube…but if you’re going to have a license from the FCC, we expect you to broadly serve the public interest.” The era of activist late-night TV is collapsing.

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr says Kimmel and Colbert are now facing the consequences of choosing to cater to a narrow, partisan audience. “You can do that, you can start a podcast, you can go on YouTube…but if you’re going to have a license from the FCC, we expect you to broadly serve the public interest.” The era of activist late-night TV is collapsing.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

322,271 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Schatz: "If there's a determination by the FCC that satire is not in the public interest, you believe you have the authority to revoke the license of the broadcaster?" Carr: "That's not my position at all…Satire that's not broadcast hoax, that's not news distortion, is perfectly fine."

Schatz: "If there's a determination by the FCC that satire is not in the public interest, you believe you have the authority to revoke the license of the broadcaster?" Carr: "That's not my position at all…Satire that's not broadcast hoax, that's not news distortion, is perfectly fine."

The Bulwark

59,273 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NEWSNATION: Should the networks air President Trump's speech tomorrow night? FCC CHAIR BRENDAN CARR: Of course. Yeah. Any time the president stands up there in primetime to deliver information or news or content, I think broadcasters should make sure the American public can see it. NN: Do you think the networks have a responsibility in terms of their TV licenses to air it? CARR: Broadcasters have an obligation to operate in the public interest.

NEWSNATION: Should the networks air President Trump's speech tomorrow night? FCC CHAIR BRENDAN CARR: Of course. Yeah. Any time the president stands up there in primetime to deliver information or news or content, I think broadcasters should make sure the American public can see it. NN: Do you think the networks have a responsibility in terms of their TV licenses to air it? CARR: Broadcasters have an obligation to operate in the public interest.

Aaron Rupar

237,851 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Murphy: "The second remedy is for the Democratic Party to make clear that if you give us power, we're gonna break up these corporate monopolies, and in particular these media monopolies ... if we want to be credible as a critic of Trump's slide to totalitarianism, then we have to explain how we're gonna put local communities back in charge of their news."

Murphy: "The second remedy is for the Democratic Party to make clear that if you give us power, we're gonna break up these corporate monopolies, and in particular these media monopolies ... if we want to be credible as a critic of Trump's slide to totalitarianism, then we have to explain how we're gonna put local communities back in charge of their news."

Aaron Rupar

220,448 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"

American Optimist

13,182 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"I cannot surround people with things that are underperforming the quality of engineering we want to do." "The most fundamental design error that you can possibly make is create a falseness in a product that make people predictably do the wrong thing. So I make a big deal out of these kind of things. I cannot surround people with things that are underperforming the quality of engineering we want to do. And that's down to the detail of the doors in the office. From the inside perspective, you have to sweat all the details. The way you do anything is how you do everything." —tobi lutke

"I cannot surround people with things that are underperforming the quality of engineering we want to do." "The most fundamental design error that you can possibly make is create a falseness in a product that make people predictably do the wrong thing. So I make a big deal out of these kind of things. I cannot surround people with things that are underperforming the quality of engineering we want to do. And that's down to the detail of the doors in the office. From the inside perspective, you have to sweat all the details. The way you do anything is how you do everything." —tobi lutke

David Senra

78,527 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

If we want real media reform, we need to give local conservative stations the firepower to fight back. Lifting the outdated FCC cap and approving Nexstar’s acquisition of Tegna is how we finally break the grip of liberal networks like ABC and NBC.

If we want real media reform, we need to give local conservative stations the firepower to fight back. Lifting the outdated FCC cap and approving Nexstar’s acquisition of Tegna is how we finally break the grip of liberal networks like ABC and NBC.

Joe Rogan Podcast News

424,180 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

BREAKING: The FCC Chairman is threatening immediate action against Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, and Disney for deliberately misleading the public by claiming Charlie Kirk’s assassin was a MAGA Conservative. Chairman Brendan Carr calls Kimmel’s malicious lies are “truly sick” and says they should result in Kimmel's immediate suspension and may lead to ABC losing its broadcast license. Chairman Carr confirms the agency has a “strong case” to hold Kimmel, ABC, and Disney accountable for spreading dangerous, politically motivated misinformation. "This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to take action on Kimmel or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead." "They have a license granted by us at the FCC, and that comes with it an obligation to operate in the public interest." "There are calls for Kimmel to be fired. I think you could certainly see a path forward for suspension over this." "The FCC could make a strong argument that this is sort of an intentional effort to mislead the American people about a very core fundamental fact, a very important matter." "Disney needs to see some change here, but the individual licensed stations that are taking their content, it's time for them to step up and say this, you know, garbage to the extent that that's what comes down the pipe in the future isn't something that we think serves the needs of our local communities. But, but this sort of status quo is obviously not, not acceptable where we are." Thank you for your strong leadership here, Chairman Brendan Carr

BREAKING: The FCC Chairman is threatening immediate action against Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, and Disney for deliberately misleading the public by claiming Charlie Kirk’s assassin was a MAGA Conservative. Chairman Brendan Carr calls Kimmel’s malicious lies are “truly sick” and says they should result in Kimmel's immediate suspension and may lead to ABC losing its broadcast license. Chairman Carr confirms the agency has a “strong case” to hold Kimmel, ABC, and Disney accountable for spreading dangerous, politically motivated misinformation. "This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to take action on Kimmel or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead." "They have a license granted by us at the FCC, and that comes with it an obligation to operate in the public interest." "There are calls for Kimmel to be fired. I think you could certainly see a path forward for suspension over this." "The FCC could make a strong argument that this is sort of an intentional effort to mislead the American people about a very core fundamental fact, a very important matter." "Disney needs to see some change here, but the individual licensed stations that are taking their content, it's time for them to step up and say this, you know, garbage to the extent that that's what comes down the pipe in the future isn't something that we think serves the needs of our local communities. But, but this sort of status quo is obviously not, not acceptable where we are." Thank you for your strong leadership here, Chairman Brendan Carr

Benny Johnson

3,605,477 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Crockett: The speaker, he loves to run when things get tough. That's not leadership. That's cowardice. And so that is what he's decided to do. We saw this happen when it came down to the Epstein files. He decided to send congress out. Right now, we are supposed to be in till Friday. He has decided that our last day is going to be tomorrow, because he does not want to deal with the fact that we have a ripe, discharge petition that is sitting in front of him

Crockett: The speaker, he loves to run when things get tough. That's not leadership. That's cowardice. And so that is what he's decided to do. We saw this happen when it came down to the Epstein files. He decided to send congress out. Right now, we are supposed to be in till Friday. He has decided that our last day is going to be tomorrow, because he does not want to deal with the fact that we have a ripe, discharge petition that is sitting in front of him

Acyn

91,109 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Sen. Josh Hawley SLAMS local district court judges issuing national injunctions on the Trump admin, calls for SCOTUS or Congress to intervene: "These are district courts, local federal courts, that are saying, 'I'm not just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I'm going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.'" "That is not a power that I think district courts have... what needs to happen is one of two things: Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions." Subscribe for the entire discussion 👉 Josh Hawley

Sen. Josh Hawley SLAMS local district court judges issuing national injunctions on the Trump admin, calls for SCOTUS or Congress to intervene: "These are district courts, local federal courts, that are saying, 'I'm not just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I'm going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.'" "That is not a power that I think district courts have... what needs to happen is one of two things: Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions." Subscribe for the entire discussion 👉 Josh Hawley

Charlie Kirk

524,379 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr