正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

“Queer Spaces Are Racist” Maybe that’s because your whole worldview obsesses over identity groups and ethnicity, in a mission-less battle on who is the most oppressed. It’s the Venn diagram of misery.

10,696 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

נושא הדגל 的头像
נושא הדגל1 年前

They're always crying and complaining. come on people are getting tired of that. And I don't want to go to your party either. You're a whiny baby!

Seán Ako 🇮🇪 的头像
Seán Ako 🇮🇪1 年前

It must be really difficult being a chronic whingebag.

Sharon Byrne 的头像
Sharon Byrne1 年前

Or it’s that the whole Queer movement is one long paroxysm of white privilege in first world countries.

SEAN PAUL DAY 的头像
SEAN PAUL DAY1 年前

In fairness, I was always struck by the segregation within New York's gay scene. Even during Pride, when the parade concluded, various groups tended to separate rather than come together. This seemed particularly unusual when compared to the more unified atmosphere in London.

Regular Gay Satanist 的头像
Regular Gay Satanist1 年前

They are insufferable. They crave victimhood so bad. I'd rather gut myself with my bare hands than waste a minute speaking to any of these people.

Moose 的头像
Moose1 年前

A corollary of "some spaces are Black spaces" is that Black people will be underrepresented in other spaces. That's unless you think Black people can be two places at once, or that White people should stay home.

Chris 𝕏 的头像
Chris 𝕏1 年前

Why do they always look like this

Vexed 的头像
Vexed1 年前

But, they're on the flag now, I thought... 🤔

Gabbermd 的头像
Gabbermd1 年前

There's a very pronounced level of self segregation, especially in gay male spaces. It's because when you base a society on physical attraction, our preferences are highlighted. I'm not saying being attracted to a certain race is wrong but the guy talking is absolutely right.

Callum J. Ager 的头像
Callum J. Ager1 年前

Queer is a term co-opted by miserable heterosexuals who want that social clout. That’s why it’s an aesthetic, hence why they always look the same. If straight people can call themselves queer, then wtf is Q doing in the LGBT?

相关视频

Every time I hear the debate between English identity and multiculturalism, I’m deeply confused. Multiculturalism essentially means that “Englishness” is an empty vessel in which cultures live together, that the vessel of being a country is neutral and empty of content. There’s been an elite project in Britain, America and Canada and generally in the English speaking world, to empty identity of distinctiveness and culture and into that empty vessel, pour any old random thing. Literally any old idea unexamined. And so you now have in Britain, a very small minority of radical islamists. They are tiny. Most muslims are not radical. They are tiny, and yet they can run your streets because everybody else is an empty vessel. You look at that idea and you say that’s not me, that’s not us, and you spit it out. But if you don’t know what me and us is, you can’t look at an idea and say that’s not us. One of the most precious things you could give your children is a thousand years of culture. It’s who you are and who you have been. Now I’m an Israeli Jew who firmly believes a nation can be multiracial but I’m worried about multicultural. Because culture is the single most important decider of human behavior. It’s the single most important thing to have in a cohesive country. To Westerners who have been trained by generations of elites to not know who you are because of a misunderstanding of what happened in the 20th century, because of a misunderstanding of where colonialism and WWII comes from, as thinking too much about your own culture, or thinking your culture is too good, is what caused the Holocaust, you need to step back. “Germaness” is not what caused the Holocaust - Haviv Rettig Gur nails it. Every word of this

Melissa Chen

245,583 次观看 • 8 个月前