Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🔥 Quick clip with the beautiful Sugar_Milf21 ✈️ LA 7/14-16; PHX 7/29-8/2 Asian queen meets PhD . Full scene dropping exclusively on OnlyFans 🎥 Link in bio or hit the link below #AsianPornstar #InterracialContent #AdultIndustry #PornTwitter #OnlyFansPromo #CoupleContent #MILFScene #ExplicitContent #OFModel #AdultEntertainment #JamieKnoxx #SugarMilf21 #VegasPornStar #ContentCreators #NSFW

jamie_knoxxx's profile picture

Jamieknoxx

71,423 subscribers

18,743 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#AsianPornstar#InterracialContent#AdultIndustry#PornTwitter#OnlyFansPromo#CoupleContent#MILFScene#ExplicitContent
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Tickets for The Stray Cats’ US Tour are on sale this Friday at 10AM local 🎫 Link in bio for tix “The Stray Cats are back and ready to blast off! It’s an amazing feeling to join up with Brian and Slim, hit the stage and Rock across America. No one can do it like us Cats, …….Nobody comes close.” - Lee Rocker TOUR DATES 🎫👇 July 24 Las Vegas, NV July 25 Phoenix, AZ July 26 Del Mar, CA July 28 Highland, CA July 29 Highland, CA July 31 Santa Rosa, CA **August 1 Saratoga, CA August 2 Wheatland, CA August 4 Sandy, UT August 5 Colorado Springs, CO August 7 TBA August 8 Kansas City, MO August 10 Huber Heights, OH August 11 TBA August 12 Northfield, OH August 14 Westbury, NY August 15 Atlantic City, NJ August 16 Morristown, NJ **venue announce + on sale TBD
0:24

Tickets for The Stray Cats’ US Tour are on sale this Friday at 10AM local 🎫 Link in bio for tix “The Stray Cats are back and ready to blast off! It’s an amazing feeling to join up with Brian and Slim, hit the stage and Rock across America. No one can do it like us Cats, …….Nobody comes close.” - Lee Rocker TOUR DATES 🎫👇 July 24 Las Vegas, NV July 25 Phoenix, AZ July 26 Del Mar, CA July 28 Highland, CA July 29 Highland, CA July 31 Santa Rosa, CA **August 1 Saratoga, CA August 2 Wheatland, CA August 4 Sandy, UT August 5 Colorado Springs, CO August 7 TBA August 8 Kansas City, MO August 10 Huber Heights, OH August 11 TBA August 12 Northfield, OH August 14 Westbury, NY August 15 Atlantic City, NJ August 16 Morristown, NJ **venue announce + on sale TBD

Brian Setzer

13,358 次观看 • 4 个月前

Engineers need to communicate effectively when building AI Systems. These terms will help you use a shared vocabulary. This is useful when discussing concepts, reading papers, or collaborating with teammates. Listed in order. 00:00 Agenda 00:28 1. Large Language Model 01:28 2. Tokenization 02:53 3. Vectorization 04:15 4. Attention 07:22 5. Self-Supervised Learning 12:07 6. Transformer 14:32 7. Fine-tuning 17:05 8. Few-shot Prompting 18:11 9. Retrieval Augmented Generation 20:33 10. Vector Database 23:03 11. Model Context Protocol 25:43 12. Context Engineering 28:17 13. Agents 29:19 14. Reinforcement Learning 34:42 15. Chain of Thought 35:55 16. Reasoning Models 36:36 17. Multi-modal Models 38:21 18. Small Language Models 40:24 19. Distillation 41:47 20. Quantization If you are a software engineer looking to transition to AI, click the link below. AI Engineering Course: #AI #SoftwareEngineering #Agents
43:33

Engineers need to communicate effectively when building AI Systems. These terms will help you use a shared vocabulary. This is useful when discussing concepts, reading papers, or collaborating with teammates. Listed in order. 00:00 Agenda 00:28 1. Large Language Model 01:28 2. Tokenization 02:53 3. Vectorization 04:15 4. Attention 07:22 5. Self-Supervised Learning 12:07 6. Transformer 14:32 7. Fine-tuning 17:05 8. Few-shot Prompting 18:11 9. Retrieval Augmented Generation 20:33 10. Vector Database 23:03 11. Model Context Protocol 25:43 12. Context Engineering 28:17 13. Agents 29:19 14. Reinforcement Learning 34:42 15. Chain of Thought 35:55 16. Reasoning Models 36:36 17. Multi-modal Models 38:21 18. Small Language Models 40:24 19. Distillation 41:47 20. Quantization If you are a software engineer looking to transition to AI, click the link below. AI Engineering Course: #AI #SoftwareEngineering #Agents

Gaurav Sen

80,115 次观看 • 10 个月前

DEEP DIVE: THE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF COVID INJECTION 'SHEDDING' AND THE GRAVITY OF AN UNSTUDIED PHENOMENON (TWEET 1 / 29) CONCRETE EVIDENCE: SHEDDING IN BREAST MILK Described as a possibility in Pfizer's clinical trial protocol Recorded in Pfizer's post-authorization data Established in the peer-reviewed literature Anecdotal accounts Accounts in VAERS Although it appears that nobody willing to speak or research publicly knows entirely what's being "shed" by those who've been jabbed with the COVID bioweapon injections(1), nor how long they shed for, the most complete and studied body of evidence so far concerns transmission via breast milk. In this first video clip, biological pharmacist(2) and former research fellow at INSERM (the French Institute for Health and Medical Research) Hélène Banoun(3) (Hélène Banoun) describes for the Corona Investigative Committee(4)(5) the most pertinent evidence available, as of February 2023, on the issue of COVID-injection shedding via breast milk. Banoun, who published a hypothesis paper in the journal of Infectious Disease Research in November 2022(6) establishing numerous ways the COVID-injection material could shed based on existing research, tells the committee about one specific research letter in JAMA Pediatrics(7) that shows, unequivocally, mRNA from the COVID injections showing up in jabbed mothers' breast milk, as well as other peer-reviewed studies showing that extracellular vesicles (EVs)(8), such as exosomes(9), after which the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in the COVID injections are modeled, appear in mothers' breast milk. Banoun notes that both LNPs and EVs "fuse with cell membranes and release their contents into the cell" and that EVs are protected from gastric juices, implying LNPs would be too. Meaning they would not be disintegrated by breastfeeding babies' digestive systems. 1. Hear about the overwhelming evidence supporting this fact from pharma insider Sasha Latypova: 2. In France and in other countries like Portugal, Spain, Belgium or Switzerland, a biological pharmacist is a pharmacist specialized in clinical biology, which is similar to clinical pathology. Source: 3. Banoun's ResearchGate profile: 4. Link to full interview: 5. Link to the organization's website: 6. Study: 7. Study: 8. "Extracellular vesicle are known to facilitate intercellular communication in diverse cellular processes such as immune responses and coagulation." Source: 9. "Exosomes are membrane-bound extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are produced in the endosomal compartment of most eukaryotic cells." Source:
2:43

DEEP DIVE: THE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF COVID INJECTION 'SHEDDING' AND THE GRAVITY OF AN UNSTUDIED PHENOMENON (TWEET 1 / 29) CONCRETE EVIDENCE: SHEDDING IN BREAST MILK Described as a possibility in Pfizer's clinical trial protocol Recorded in Pfizer's post-authorization data Established in the peer-reviewed literature Anecdotal accounts Accounts in VAERS Although it appears that nobody willing to speak or research publicly knows entirely what's being "shed" by those who've been jabbed with the COVID bioweapon injections(1), nor how long they shed for, the most complete and studied body of evidence so far concerns transmission via breast milk. In this first video clip, biological pharmacist(2) and former research fellow at INSERM (the French Institute for Health and Medical Research) Hélène Banoun(3) (Hélène Banoun) describes for the Corona Investigative Committee(4)(5) the most pertinent evidence available, as of February 2023, on the issue of COVID-injection shedding via breast milk. Banoun, who published a hypothesis paper in the journal of Infectious Disease Research in November 2022(6) establishing numerous ways the COVID-injection material could shed based on existing research, tells the committee about one specific research letter in JAMA Pediatrics(7) that shows, unequivocally, mRNA from the COVID injections showing up in jabbed mothers' breast milk, as well as other peer-reviewed studies showing that extracellular vesicles (EVs)(8), such as exosomes(9), after which the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in the COVID injections are modeled, appear in mothers' breast milk. Banoun notes that both LNPs and EVs "fuse with cell membranes and release their contents into the cell" and that EVs are protected from gastric juices, implying LNPs would be too. Meaning they would not be disintegrated by breastfeeding babies' digestive systems. 1. Hear about the overwhelming evidence supporting this fact from pharma insider Sasha Latypova: 2. In France and in other countries like Portugal, Spain, Belgium or Switzerland, a biological pharmacist is a pharmacist specialized in clinical biology, which is similar to clinical pathology. Source: 3. Banoun's ResearchGate profile: 4. Link to full interview: 5. Link to the organization's website: 6. Study: 7. Study: 8. "Extracellular vesicle are known to facilitate intercellular communication in diverse cellular processes such as immune responses and coagulation." Source: 9. "Exosomes are membrane-bound extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are produced in the endosomal compartment of most eukaryotic cells." Source:

Sense Receptor

177,225 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨EXPOSED: Fort Huachuca Triggered the Bot Swarm: Candace Owens Links Mystery SAM000 Jet to Charlie Kirk Hit?! ✈️ Listen up, patriots—Candace Owens just went nuclear on her podcast, exposing the massive military-grade bot swarm and psyop that exploded the SECOND she started digging into Fort Huachuca. As soon as Candace mentioned: Fort Huachuca (Army intel/drone warfare hub) The eyewitness spotting a "final meeting" there. The attacks went hysterical. Military-grade bots flooded in—same scripted talking points, coordinated smears, fanfiction lies—exact pattern she saw post-Oct 7 and during her Australia cancel attempt. Candace: "This ratcheting up only happened when we hit Fort Huachuca and the planes. That's where their panic is." New bombshell timeline confirmation: August 25, 2025: Ultra-sensitive SAM000 flight (highest VIP secrecy callsign) lands Colorado Springs (10th Special Forces Group) → Las Vegas (Kash Patel's home). Callsign drops to regular RCH when someone deplanes in Vegas—meaning a top-tier VIP boarded or disembarked. This is the same jet series used for presidential family, Cabinet, Joint Chiefs. Brian Harpool claimed UVU prep started August 24—exact overlap with this mystery VIP movement. Candace: "Federal disaster incoming for Kash Patel. Prints ALL over this." She's bringing the eyewitness on soon to tell his full story—everything checked out so far. The psyop is failing because WE see the panic points: Fort Huachuca + Egyptian planes = over the target. Tomorrow: Full Egyptian planes exposé proving Israel links. Buckle up—the mask is off. Who's ready for the eyewitness testimony? Drop a 🔥 if you're locked in. FOLLOW Candace Owens, and go watch her FULL episode from today. Link is in the comments below. Stay focused, family. They're freaking out for a reason. 🇺🇸
15:59

🚨EXPOSED: Fort Huachuca Triggered the Bot Swarm: Candace Owens Links Mystery SAM000 Jet to Charlie Kirk Hit?! ✈️ Listen up, patriots—Candace Owens just went nuclear on her podcast, exposing the massive military-grade bot swarm and psyop that exploded the SECOND she started digging into Fort Huachuca. As soon as Candace mentioned: Fort Huachuca (Army intel/drone warfare hub) The eyewitness spotting a "final meeting" there. The attacks went hysterical. Military-grade bots flooded in—same scripted talking points, coordinated smears, fanfiction lies—exact pattern she saw post-Oct 7 and during her Australia cancel attempt. Candace: "This ratcheting up only happened when we hit Fort Huachuca and the planes. That's where their panic is." New bombshell timeline confirmation: August 25, 2025: Ultra-sensitive SAM000 flight (highest VIP secrecy callsign) lands Colorado Springs (10th Special Forces Group) → Las Vegas (Kash Patel's home). Callsign drops to regular RCH when someone deplanes in Vegas—meaning a top-tier VIP boarded or disembarked. This is the same jet series used for presidential family, Cabinet, Joint Chiefs. Brian Harpool claimed UVU prep started August 24—exact overlap with this mystery VIP movement. Candace: "Federal disaster incoming for Kash Patel. Prints ALL over this." She's bringing the eyewitness on soon to tell his full story—everything checked out so far. The psyop is failing because WE see the panic points: Fort Huachuca + Egyptian planes = over the target. Tomorrow: Full Egyptian planes exposé proving Israel links. Buckle up—the mask is off. Who's ready for the eyewitness testimony? Drop a 🔥 if you're locked in. FOLLOW Candace Owens, and go watch her FULL episode from today. Link is in the comments below. Stay focused, family. They're freaking out for a reason. 🇺🇸

Project Constitution

50,018 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨ZHERKA x CLAVICULAR FULL CALL PT. 2 👀🔥 Topics: (0:00) Opening + Airport Call + Fake Drug Story (0:27) Cocaine Risks + Heart Attack Talk (0:58) BDO, Alcohol, and Lethal Dose (1:26) Ketamine, BDNF, and Cognitive Effects (2:25) Therapeutic Use vs Abuse (4:02) Why He Says Not to Do Drugs (4:31) Using Stimulants for Streaming (5:00) Addiction, Willpower, and Audience Influence (6:03) Adderall Era + Building Content (6:29) Daily Use vs Going Hard (7:32) Dopamine from Clips vs Real Life (8:06) Content vs Girls (8:36) Lifestyle, Girls, and Routine (9:28) Grace, Age, and Learning Experience (10:38) Intentions from the Start (11:22) Situation with Girls + Setup (11:49) Genetics, Attraction, and “Genetics Pill” (12:18) Why His Life Doesn’t Apply to Most People (13:04) Clip Farming Strategy (13:30) OnlyFans, Genetics, and Concerns (14:13) Kids, Legacy, and Future Planning (14:42) Building an Empire Through Family (15:22) IGF-1, Growth, and Planning Kids (16:04) Height, Frame, and Physical Traits (16:30) Genetics vs Luck Between Siblings (16:57) Parenting for Optimization (17:24) Gym at a Young Age Debate (17:54) Testosterone Use + Cycles (18:21) Compounds, Confidence, and Behavior (18:52) Yohimbine and Anxiety (19:31) Pre-workout and Supplements (20:00) Testosterone vs DHT (20:33) Estrogen, Collagen, and Skin (21:01) Looks, Models, and Face Optimization (21:32) TRT vs Higher Doses (22:02) DHT Blockers and Aging (22:35) What Actually Ages You (UV, Alcohol, Stress) (23:12) Stress vs Physical Aging Debate (23:46) Hair Loss Prevention + New Tech (24:12) Looksmaxing in 2026 (24:40) Status, Money, and Looks (25:20) Ascending Through Looks (25:36) Bottom Tier Reality (26:06) Money Maxing vs Attraction (26:38) Coming Out to Miami + Linking Up (27:09) Taking Over the Stream + Episode Plans (27:46) Rating Girls + “Trying to Help” (28:42) Watching His Content + Strategy (29:14) Running Streams While Working (29:50) Viral Content vs Personal Fulfillment
30:36

🚨ZHERKA x CLAVICULAR FULL CALL PT. 2 👀🔥 Topics: (0:00) Opening + Airport Call + Fake Drug Story (0:27) Cocaine Risks + Heart Attack Talk (0:58) BDO, Alcohol, and Lethal Dose (1:26) Ketamine, BDNF, and Cognitive Effects (2:25) Therapeutic Use vs Abuse (4:02) Why He Says Not to Do Drugs (4:31) Using Stimulants for Streaming (5:00) Addiction, Willpower, and Audience Influence (6:03) Adderall Era + Building Content (6:29) Daily Use vs Going Hard (7:32) Dopamine from Clips vs Real Life (8:06) Content vs Girls (8:36) Lifestyle, Girls, and Routine (9:28) Grace, Age, and Learning Experience (10:38) Intentions from the Start (11:22) Situation with Girls + Setup (11:49) Genetics, Attraction, and “Genetics Pill” (12:18) Why His Life Doesn’t Apply to Most People (13:04) Clip Farming Strategy (13:30) OnlyFans, Genetics, and Concerns (14:13) Kids, Legacy, and Future Planning (14:42) Building an Empire Through Family (15:22) IGF-1, Growth, and Planning Kids (16:04) Height, Frame, and Physical Traits (16:30) Genetics vs Luck Between Siblings (16:57) Parenting for Optimization (17:24) Gym at a Young Age Debate (17:54) Testosterone Use + Cycles (18:21) Compounds, Confidence, and Behavior (18:52) Yohimbine and Anxiety (19:31) Pre-workout and Supplements (20:00) Testosterone vs DHT (20:33) Estrogen, Collagen, and Skin (21:01) Looks, Models, and Face Optimization (21:32) TRT vs Higher Doses (22:02) DHT Blockers and Aging (22:35) What Actually Ages You (UV, Alcohol, Stress) (23:12) Stress vs Physical Aging Debate (23:46) Hair Loss Prevention + New Tech (24:12) Looksmaxing in 2026 (24:40) Status, Money, and Looks (25:20) Ascending Through Looks (25:36) Bottom Tier Reality (26:06) Money Maxing vs Attraction (26:38) Coming Out to Miami + Linking Up (27:09) Taking Over the Stream + Episode Plans (27:46) Rating Girls + “Trying to Help” (28:42) Watching His Content + Strategy (29:14) Running Streams While Working (29:50) Viral Content vs Personal Fulfillment

ZHERKA DAILY

30,495 次观看 • 3 个月前

David Zucker wrote some of the funniest movies in Hollywood history: Airplane, Naked Gun, and Scary Movie 3. He's probably the world’s top spoof comedy writer, and he shared all his tricks in our interview. Highlights below: 1. Let the lines do the work: Zucker doesn’t want actors to try to be funny on top of the dialogue itself. Trying to be funny kills the humor, so he tells them to speak plainly. 2. Spoofs work best when actors play it like they don't know they're in a comedy. 3. Keep the audience laughing. Like, literally... don't let them stop. It's easier to keep an audience laughing than to start them up all over again. That’s why his movies have joke-after-joke-after-joke... in endless succession. 4. Cut on the laugh, not after it. The moment you hit peak funny, move on. 5. Jokes aren’t enough… Even comedies need a story the audience actually cares about. 6. Unlike most kinds of writing, it’s way easier to write comedy in a group because you can gauge other people's reactions so much faster. 7. By the time a topic is being referenced at major film awards or late night TV shows, it’s past its prime. Talk about something else. 8. Don’t blame others for failure. When something doesn’t work, look in the mirror and ask: "What did I do wrong?" 9. Don’t break the frame by reminding the audience that they’re watching a movie (with some exceptions). 10. Your first draft will be too long. It’s true for writing and it’s true for film. 11. Avoid jokes that depend on trivia, where you reference something so specific that only a few people will get it. 12. Don’t acknowledge your jokes. Doing so kills the laugh. 13. Zucker got started doing in-person comedy sketches, which taught him how to gauge an audience's feedback to see if a joke is funny. Unlike most directors, he does the same thing with movies, which gives him a better sense for what is / isn’t funny. 14. Doing these live performances taught Zucker that being clever isn't enough. You have to actually get people to laugh. If they aren't laughing, it ain't funny. Simple as that. Doesn't matter how smart you are. 15. The last rule is that there are no rules. It is sometimes wise to break every one of these rules. I've shared the full interview with David Zucker below. If you want to watch on YouTube or listen on Apple or Spotify, check out the first reply tweet and you'll find the link.
1:13:28

David Zucker wrote some of the funniest movies in Hollywood history: Airplane, Naked Gun, and Scary Movie 3. He's probably the world’s top spoof comedy writer, and he shared all his tricks in our interview. Highlights below: 1. Let the lines do the work: Zucker doesn’t want actors to try to be funny on top of the dialogue itself. Trying to be funny kills the humor, so he tells them to speak plainly. 2. Spoofs work best when actors play it like they don't know they're in a comedy. 3. Keep the audience laughing. Like, literally... don't let them stop. It's easier to keep an audience laughing than to start them up all over again. That’s why his movies have joke-after-joke-after-joke... in endless succession. 4. Cut on the laugh, not after it. The moment you hit peak funny, move on. 5. Jokes aren’t enough… Even comedies need a story the audience actually cares about. 6. Unlike most kinds of writing, it’s way easier to write comedy in a group because you can gauge other people's reactions so much faster. 7. By the time a topic is being referenced at major film awards or late night TV shows, it’s past its prime. Talk about something else. 8. Don’t blame others for failure. When something doesn’t work, look in the mirror and ask: "What did I do wrong?" 9. Don’t break the frame by reminding the audience that they’re watching a movie (with some exceptions). 10. Your first draft will be too long. It’s true for writing and it’s true for film. 11. Avoid jokes that depend on trivia, where you reference something so specific that only a few people will get it. 12. Don’t acknowledge your jokes. Doing so kills the laugh. 13. Zucker got started doing in-person comedy sketches, which taught him how to gauge an audience's feedback to see if a joke is funny. Unlike most directors, he does the same thing with movies, which gives him a better sense for what is / isn’t funny. 14. Doing these live performances taught Zucker that being clever isn't enough. You have to actually get people to laugh. If they aren't laughing, it ain't funny. Simple as that. Doesn't matter how smart you are. 15. The last rule is that there are no rules. It is sometimes wise to break every one of these rules. I've shared the full interview with David Zucker below. If you want to watch on YouTube or listen on Apple or Spotify, check out the first reply tweet and you'll find the link.

David Perell

71,633 次观看 • 1 年前

10 free github repos that can replace major SaaS with subscriptions. all free. open-sourced. some are MIT licensed. — 1️⃣ openscreen — replaces screen studio ($29/mo) - a clean macOS/windows/linux screen recorder for polished demos. - blur, cursor highlighting, annotations, export to mp4 or gif at any aspect ratio. - doesn't try to clone every feature, just nails the basics for quick walkthroughs you'd post on X. — 2️⃣ voicebox — replaces elevenlabs ($22/mo) + wisprflow ($15/mo) - local-first AI voice studio. - clone voices from 3 seconds of audio, generate speech across 7 TTS engines in 23 languages, - dictate into any text field with a global hotkey. - nothing leaves your machine. - runs on apple silicon, cuda, rocm. — 3️⃣ openshorts — replaces opus clip ($19/mo) + submagic ($16/mo) - free AI video platform. - clip generator turns long youtube videos into 9:16 shorts with auto-subtitles and face tracking (runs on free gemini + elevenlabs tiers). - also includes AI UGC video generation with actors — that part is pay-per-use via fal. ai (~$0.65-2 per video). docker self-host. — 4️⃣ freellmapi — replaces chatgpt pro + claude pro ($20/mo each) - stacks 14 free AI provider tiers (google, groq, cerebras, openrouter, github models + 9 more) behind one openai-compatible endpoint. ~800M tokens/month. - smart router with failover, sticky sessions, encrypted key storage. ships with a dashboard. — 5️⃣ playwright-mcp — replaces browserbase ($39/mo) + browser use ($25/mo) - microsoft's official MCP server that gives any AI agent full browser control. - uses accessibility trees, not screenshots — deterministic and token-efficient. - works with claude code, cursor, windsurf, codex out of the box. — 6️⃣ vibe-trading — replaces tradingview premium ($60/mo) - natural-language finance research agent. - 7 backtest engines across stocks, crypto, futures, forex. - 75 specialist skills (factor analysis, options strategy, ML strategy). - 29 multi-agent swarm presets. - 21 of 22 MCP tools work with zero API keys. — 7️⃣ CalCom — replaces calendly ($12/mo) + savvycal ($12/mo) - the open-source scheduling infrastructure. - one-on-ones, group events, round-robin, team booking, - payment collection (stripe), routing forms, workflows. - integrates with google/outlook/apple calendar, zoom, meet, teams. - self-host in 10 minutes with docker. 40k stars. — 8️⃣ whisper — replaces otter ($17/mo) - openAI's open-source speech-to-text model. - transcribe audio in 99 languages, translate to english, generate timestamps. - runs locally on cpu or gpu. - the actual model behind most "AI transcription" SaaS tools you're paying for. — 9️⃣ postiz — replaces buffer ($15/mo) - AI-powered social media scheduler. - cross-post to X, linkedin, instagram, tiktok, threads, bluesky, mastodon, youtube, pinterest. - AI captions and hashtags. - analytics dashboard. team workspaces. 31k stars and rising. — 🔟 vaultwarden — replaces 1password ($8/mo) - unofficial bitwarden-compatible server written in rust. - works with every official bitwarden client (mobile, desktop, browser). - unlimited users, unlimited vaults, full enterprise feature set. - runs on a $5 VPS or your home server. — disclaimer: open-source ≠ 1:1 replacement. you'll trade polish for ownership, hand-holding for control, and a credit card for a github version. for builders, prototypers, and indie hackers — that's the whole point. for everyone else, the paid tools still have their place. bookmark this. share with one friend bleeding subscription fees. ~m0h
0:31

10 free github repos that can replace major SaaS with subscriptions. all free. open-sourced. some are MIT licensed. — 1️⃣ openscreen — replaces screen studio ($29/mo) - a clean macOS/windows/linux screen recorder for polished demos. - blur, cursor highlighting, annotations, export to mp4 or gif at any aspect ratio. - doesn't try to clone every feature, just nails the basics for quick walkthroughs you'd post on X. — 2️⃣ voicebox — replaces elevenlabs ($22/mo) + wisprflow ($15/mo) - local-first AI voice studio. - clone voices from 3 seconds of audio, generate speech across 7 TTS engines in 23 languages, - dictate into any text field with a global hotkey. - nothing leaves your machine. - runs on apple silicon, cuda, rocm. — 3️⃣ openshorts — replaces opus clip ($19/mo) + submagic ($16/mo) - free AI video platform. - clip generator turns long youtube videos into 9:16 shorts with auto-subtitles and face tracking (runs on free gemini + elevenlabs tiers). - also includes AI UGC video generation with actors — that part is pay-per-use via fal. ai (~$0.65-2 per video). docker self-host. — 4️⃣ freellmapi — replaces chatgpt pro + claude pro ($20/mo each) - stacks 14 free AI provider tiers (google, groq, cerebras, openrouter, github models + 9 more) behind one openai-compatible endpoint. ~800M tokens/month. - smart router with failover, sticky sessions, encrypted key storage. ships with a dashboard. — 5️⃣ playwright-mcp — replaces browserbase ($39/mo) + browser use ($25/mo) - microsoft's official MCP server that gives any AI agent full browser control. - uses accessibility trees, not screenshots — deterministic and token-efficient. - works with claude code, cursor, windsurf, codex out of the box. — 6️⃣ vibe-trading — replaces tradingview premium ($60/mo) - natural-language finance research agent. - 7 backtest engines across stocks, crypto, futures, forex. - 75 specialist skills (factor analysis, options strategy, ML strategy). - 29 multi-agent swarm presets. - 21 of 22 MCP tools work with zero API keys. — 7️⃣ CalCom — replaces calendly ($12/mo) + savvycal ($12/mo) - the open-source scheduling infrastructure. - one-on-ones, group events, round-robin, team booking, - payment collection (stripe), routing forms, workflows. - integrates with google/outlook/apple calendar, zoom, meet, teams. - self-host in 10 minutes with docker. 40k stars. — 8️⃣ whisper — replaces otter ($17/mo) - openAI's open-source speech-to-text model. - transcribe audio in 99 languages, translate to english, generate timestamps. - runs locally on cpu or gpu. - the actual model behind most "AI transcription" SaaS tools you're paying for. — 9️⃣ postiz — replaces buffer ($15/mo) - AI-powered social media scheduler. - cross-post to X, linkedin, instagram, tiktok, threads, bluesky, mastodon, youtube, pinterest. - AI captions and hashtags. - analytics dashboard. team workspaces. 31k stars and rising. — 🔟 vaultwarden — replaces 1password ($8/mo) - unofficial bitwarden-compatible server written in rust. - works with every official bitwarden client (mobile, desktop, browser). - unlimited users, unlimited vaults, full enterprise feature set. - runs on a $5 VPS or your home server. — disclaimer: open-source ≠ 1:1 replacement. you'll trade polish for ownership, hand-holding for control, and a credit card for a github version. for builders, prototypers, and indie hackers — that's the whole point. for everyone else, the paid tools still have their place. bookmark this. share with one friend bleeding subscription fees. ~m0h

m0h

247,857 次观看 • 2 个月前

Introducing Fintarget 2.0 Change the way you automate your trades by visiting What’s Fresh & Exciting? 1) A clutter‑free screen that feels like second nature. 2) Intraday Algos, On‑Demand: You can now utilize all the functionalities like journey, next week, monthly options and much more. 3) Positional Trades on Auto‑Pilot: You can now automate positional trades on fintarget Set it, forget it, wake up to executed plans (BETA) 4) Backtest Before You Blast Off: Fintarget is now connected with Stockmock.in (Backtesting, Simulator & Builder) . With your purchase of a Fintarget subscription, you'll get Stockmock credits added to your account. 5) Why formulate strategies when you can replicate: Fintarget now makes it possible for you to copy-paste the strategy link directly from Stockmock . 6) TradingView Plug-In Magic: Automate your strategies and initiate entry by triggering from TradingView signals. 7) Deep Dive Analytics: Find your edge, correct your flaws, level up. 8) Automate your trades with 11 brokers now: Trade anywhere without having to switch tabs. 9) Pre-built Strategies: Don't know where to start? We’ve got lucrative, ready-to-go strategies designed for you. 10) Custom leg control: Choose limit or market, auto-switch if unfilled, and much more. 11) Forward-Test Sandbox: Fintarget now includes Forward Testing. Run practice rounds with zero risk. 12) Live runs + backtest credits + forward test credits: Plans starting at just ₹299. 13) Refer & Earn: Refer your friends, get rewarded forever. 14) Pocket-Perfect On-the-Go: Full power, palm-sized convenience. 15) Broker Tie-ups: Now Fintarget is available for use by everyone from @thefirstock and Upstox users 16) Want to start your automation journey?: All users are given free forward testing plans for up to 2 strategies daily. A special thanks to Nitish Narang Stockmock.in (Backtesting, Simulator & Builder) and @thefirstock team for all the guidance and support.
1:47

Introducing Fintarget 2.0 Change the way you automate your trades by visiting What’s Fresh & Exciting? 1) A clutter‑free screen that feels like second nature. 2) Intraday Algos, On‑Demand: You can now utilize all the functionalities like journey, next week, monthly options and much more. 3) Positional Trades on Auto‑Pilot: You can now automate positional trades on fintarget Set it, forget it, wake up to executed plans (BETA) 4) Backtest Before You Blast Off: Fintarget is now connected with Stockmock.in (Backtesting, Simulator & Builder) . With your purchase of a Fintarget subscription, you'll get Stockmock credits added to your account. 5) Why formulate strategies when you can replicate: Fintarget now makes it possible for you to copy-paste the strategy link directly from Stockmock . 6) TradingView Plug-In Magic: Automate your strategies and initiate entry by triggering from TradingView signals. 7) Deep Dive Analytics: Find your edge, correct your flaws, level up. 8) Automate your trades with 11 brokers now: Trade anywhere without having to switch tabs. 9) Pre-built Strategies: Don't know where to start? We’ve got lucrative, ready-to-go strategies designed for you. 10) Custom leg control: Choose limit or market, auto-switch if unfilled, and much more. 11) Forward-Test Sandbox: Fintarget now includes Forward Testing. Run practice rounds with zero risk. 12) Live runs + backtest credits + forward test credits: Plans starting at just ₹299. 13) Refer & Earn: Refer your friends, get rewarded forever. 14) Pocket-Perfect On-the-Go: Full power, palm-sized convenience. 15) Broker Tie-ups: Now Fintarget is available for use by everyone from @thefirstock and Upstox users 16) Want to start your automation journey?: All users are given free forward testing plans for up to 2 strategies daily. A special thanks to Nitish Narang Stockmock.in (Backtesting, Simulator & Builder) and @thefirstock team for all the guidance and support.

Saketh R

49,011 次观看 • 1 年前

Nebius is going to be a Trillion-dollar company! Twelve months ago, Nebius was trading near $18 per share with roughly $55 million in quarterly revenue. Today the stock trades above $225, quarterly revenue just came in at $399 million, up 684% year over year and the company has a contracted revenue backlog that would make most Fortune 500 companies envious. But the current market cap, sitting around $56 billion, prices in almost none of what is actually coming. The first reason Nebius reaches a trillion is the Meta deal alone. In March, Nebius signed a five year agreement with Meta worth up to $27 billion, one of the largest infrastructure contracts Meta has ever signed with any company under which Nebius will provide $12 billion in dedicated AI capacity across multiple locations, with Meta also having committed to purchase up to an additional $15 billion in third-party capacity over the same period. That contract barely starts until 2027, which means the revenue impact is not yet reflected in any trailing metric. The second reason is Microsoft, which is currently receiving its first deployment phases from Nebius and is expected to contribute at full annual run rate starting in 2027. Between Meta and Microsoft alone, Nebius has signed agreements worth more than $46 billion in total contracted value before a single additional customer is counted. The third reason is the ARR trajectory, which is the fastest revenue ramp of any infrastructure company in the public markets. Nebius ended 2025 at $1.25 billion in ARR and is guiding to $7–9 billion ARR by year-end 2026. Wall Street analysts project revenue growing 523% in 2026 and another 206% in 2027. One of the company's own institutional shareholders has already suggested the year-end ARR could come in more than twice the guided range if the Meta and Microsoft ramps hit their timelines. The fourth reason is Nvidia's direct involvement. Nvidia made a $2 billion strategic equity investment in Nebius and has given Nebius early access to the Vera Rubin platform, its next generation GPU architecture as part of the delivery commitments to Meta. The fifth reason is the capacity buildout, which is being funded by the revenue itself. Nebius invested $2.5 billion in capex in Q1 alone, CEO Arkady Volozh has guided for $16–20 billion in total investment for 2026, and contracted capacity is now on track to exceed 4 GW by year end with new owned sites in Pennsylvania at 1.2 GW and Finland at 310 MW now under development. The more capacity they build, the more they can sell and demand continues to outpace supply at every stage of the buildout. When you run the math on a business with $7–9 billion in ARR exiting 2026, a $27 billion Meta contract that begins in earnest in 2027, a Microsoft relationship at full run rate, 206% analyst projected growth in 2027, and a structural relationship with Nvidia that gives it hardware access no competitor can match, a trillion-dollar valuation within three to four years is not a moonshot. It is the base case if the compounding holds, and every data point so far suggests it is. Milk Road Pro called this one early. Our analysts added Nebius to the portfolio when it was still flying under the radar, and we are sitting on a massive gain on that position right now. If you want to see what else we are building conviction on before the rest of the market catches up, come join us at Milk Road Pro at the link in bio/below!
1:04

Nebius is going to be a Trillion-dollar company! Twelve months ago, Nebius was trading near $18 per share with roughly $55 million in quarterly revenue. Today the stock trades above $225, quarterly revenue just came in at $399 million, up 684% year over year and the company has a contracted revenue backlog that would make most Fortune 500 companies envious. But the current market cap, sitting around $56 billion, prices in almost none of what is actually coming. The first reason Nebius reaches a trillion is the Meta deal alone. In March, Nebius signed a five year agreement with Meta worth up to $27 billion, one of the largest infrastructure contracts Meta has ever signed with any company under which Nebius will provide $12 billion in dedicated AI capacity across multiple locations, with Meta also having committed to purchase up to an additional $15 billion in third-party capacity over the same period. That contract barely starts until 2027, which means the revenue impact is not yet reflected in any trailing metric. The second reason is Microsoft, which is currently receiving its first deployment phases from Nebius and is expected to contribute at full annual run rate starting in 2027. Between Meta and Microsoft alone, Nebius has signed agreements worth more than $46 billion in total contracted value before a single additional customer is counted. The third reason is the ARR trajectory, which is the fastest revenue ramp of any infrastructure company in the public markets. Nebius ended 2025 at $1.25 billion in ARR and is guiding to $7–9 billion ARR by year-end 2026. Wall Street analysts project revenue growing 523% in 2026 and another 206% in 2027. One of the company's own institutional shareholders has already suggested the year-end ARR could come in more than twice the guided range if the Meta and Microsoft ramps hit their timelines. The fourth reason is Nvidia's direct involvement. Nvidia made a $2 billion strategic equity investment in Nebius and has given Nebius early access to the Vera Rubin platform, its next generation GPU architecture as part of the delivery commitments to Meta. The fifth reason is the capacity buildout, which is being funded by the revenue itself. Nebius invested $2.5 billion in capex in Q1 alone, CEO Arkady Volozh has guided for $16–20 billion in total investment for 2026, and contracted capacity is now on track to exceed 4 GW by year end with new owned sites in Pennsylvania at 1.2 GW and Finland at 310 MW now under development. The more capacity they build, the more they can sell and demand continues to outpace supply at every stage of the buildout. When you run the math on a business with $7–9 billion in ARR exiting 2026, a $27 billion Meta contract that begins in earnest in 2027, a Microsoft relationship at full run rate, 206% analyst projected growth in 2027, and a structural relationship with Nvidia that gives it hardware access no competitor can match, a trillion-dollar valuation within three to four years is not a moonshot. It is the base case if the compounding holds, and every data point so far suggests it is. Milk Road Pro called this one early. Our analysts added Nebius to the portfolio when it was still flying under the radar, and we are sitting on a massive gain on that position right now. If you want to see what else we are building conviction on before the rest of the market catches up, come join us at Milk Road Pro at the link in bio/below!

Milk Road AI

48,673 次观看 • 2 个月前

Robert Macfarlane is an author and professor at Cambridge who writes non-fiction with the beauty of fiction. Some highlights from our interview: 1. Avoid things that dilute your sense of wonder. 2. Children are wondernauts. They continually voyaging in jay-dropping astonishment because of the freely given miracle of this world. 3. Raid old dialect glossaries in regional libraries for words that are precise, lyrical, and sometimes absurd. Take rionnach maoim, a Gaelic word for "the shadows cast on the moorland by clouds moving across the sky on a bright and windy day." 4. Why Robert loves the em dash: It’s liquid punctuation that flows both ways, unlike the hard bookend of a full stop period. Meaning can move against the current, eddy back up the sentence, or flow down. It's your most beautiful, fluid piece of traffic control for meaning. 5. Resist over-explanation. Sometimes, it’s okay to leave gaps in your writing so your readers can become your cowriters. 6. Don’t use big words to sound impressive. Use them to be precise. Sometimes, you can say more with the right four-syllable word than you can in four sentences. 7. For those raised on rationality, ask yourself: Has this become a prison? What can’t I see because of the blinders of rationality? 8. Take lots and lots of notes. You don’t need to write much. Just enough for little fragments to become threads of memory you can pull from to summon entire scenes once you return to your computer. 9. Don’t be scared of writing nonlinearly. You can build your books out of mosaics and edit by jumping up and downstream. 10. Edit your writing by reading it out-loud: the tongue trips on what the eye glides across, and the ear hears things that escape the usual systems of vigilance. 11. Abandon the goal of trying to “capture” your experience of nature. Lean into your perception of it instead and write about how you perceived it, not what it actually was. 12. How can you do it? Metaphor. Yes, metaphors are fundamentally about distorting reality but they can evoke something far richer than what people can see on their own. 13. His advice to writers: Ass in chair. Show up for work, every day, and put the time in. Yes, it can be “brain hurty” work but don’t run away from it. 14. When you end a day's writing, always know what the next sentence will be. It's like pushing off on a bike: you can wake up tomorrow with momentum instead of trying to start all over again. 15. In songwriting you learn to let language cross-pollinate in weird ways, which creates uncanny connections. What seems like a glitch becomes precisely the feature you need. 16. Rhythm in nonfiction does what fiction has always known. It works on the mind’s ear. We expect poetry to be rhythmic, but prose can use these same sonic tools to reach deeper down forms of knowing that bypass the analytical mind. I've shared the full conversation with Robert Macfarlane below, and the links for YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts in the reply tweets.
1:29:16

Robert Macfarlane is an author and professor at Cambridge who writes non-fiction with the beauty of fiction. Some highlights from our interview: 1. Avoid things that dilute your sense of wonder. 2. Children are wondernauts. They continually voyaging in jay-dropping astonishment because of the freely given miracle of this world. 3. Raid old dialect glossaries in regional libraries for words that are precise, lyrical, and sometimes absurd. Take rionnach maoim, a Gaelic word for "the shadows cast on the moorland by clouds moving across the sky on a bright and windy day." 4. Why Robert loves the em dash: It’s liquid punctuation that flows both ways, unlike the hard bookend of a full stop period. Meaning can move against the current, eddy back up the sentence, or flow down. It's your most beautiful, fluid piece of traffic control for meaning. 5. Resist over-explanation. Sometimes, it’s okay to leave gaps in your writing so your readers can become your cowriters. 6. Don’t use big words to sound impressive. Use them to be precise. Sometimes, you can say more with the right four-syllable word than you can in four sentences. 7. For those raised on rationality, ask yourself: Has this become a prison? What can’t I see because of the blinders of rationality? 8. Take lots and lots of notes. You don’t need to write much. Just enough for little fragments to become threads of memory you can pull from to summon entire scenes once you return to your computer. 9. Don’t be scared of writing nonlinearly. You can build your books out of mosaics and edit by jumping up and downstream. 10. Edit your writing by reading it out-loud: the tongue trips on what the eye glides across, and the ear hears things that escape the usual systems of vigilance. 11. Abandon the goal of trying to “capture” your experience of nature. Lean into your perception of it instead and write about how you perceived it, not what it actually was. 12. How can you do it? Metaphor. Yes, metaphors are fundamentally about distorting reality but they can evoke something far richer than what people can see on their own. 13. His advice to writers: Ass in chair. Show up for work, every day, and put the time in. Yes, it can be “brain hurty” work but don’t run away from it. 14. When you end a day's writing, always know what the next sentence will be. It's like pushing off on a bike: you can wake up tomorrow with momentum instead of trying to start all over again. 15. In songwriting you learn to let language cross-pollinate in weird ways, which creates uncanny connections. What seems like a glitch becomes precisely the feature you need. 16. Rhythm in nonfiction does what fiction has always known. It works on the mind’s ear. We expect poetry to be rhythmic, but prose can use these same sonic tools to reach deeper down forms of knowing that bypass the analytical mind. I've shared the full conversation with Robert Macfarlane below, and the links for YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts in the reply tweets.

David Perell

163,137 次观看 • 1 年前

losers spend money on club tables and take home zero girls buying bottles at liv miami trying to impress models who make $500/night when you could be recruiting them for onlyfans with 0% apr tables and take 90% of their revenue... $300k/month from girls you met at clubs here's the onlyfans mafia system destroying simps: every weekend desperate mfs drop $50k cash on tables models pretend to care for 3 hours everyone goes home alone money wasted meanwhile smart operators run different game: THE CREDIT CARD TABLE HACK: get $150k in business funding at 0% apr book owner's tables at tier-1 miami clubs never spend cash - everything on cards earn 300k points while recruiting cards to get approved for today: - chase ink preferred: $30k typical - amex business gold: $50k typical - capital one spark: $40k typical - wells fargo business: $30k typical $150k at 0% in 30 days if you're not stupid THE RECRUITMENT PSYCHOLOGY: table attracts 10-15 models per night they think you're a whale you're not you're a businessman the pitch that converts 40%: "i manage content creators everything's handled - photographer, editor, marketing creators keep 10% pure profit most make $3-5k/month passive here's my portfolio..." show them your roster: girl #1: was bartending at bodega now: $50k/month on OF her take: $5000 your take: $45,000 girl #2: was bottle service at e11even now: $31k/month her take: $3,100 your take: $27,900 they all say yes THE MIAMI CLUB RANKING: recruit here in exact order: 1. liv (fontainebleau) - international models 2. e11even (24/7) - party girls who need money 3. story (south beach) - college girls 4. space (downtown) - underground scene 5. basement (edition) - high-end escorts transitioning wednesday-thursday better than weekends less competition from actual rich guys girls more desperate for attention THE ONLYFANS ASSEMBLY LINE: week 1: professional shoot ($500) week 2: launch with 50 posts ready week 3: tiktok spam campaign week 4: instagram reels push month 2: optimize pricing month 3: $15-30k/month steady your only job: - recruit - manage photographers - collect 90% THE BUSINESS MODEL MATH: monthly costs: - tables: $40k (on 0% cards) - photographer: $8k - editors: $5k (philippines) - shoot apartment: $4k total overhead: $57k 20 girls at $15k average: $300k your 90% cut: $270k monthly profit: $213k started with credit cards ending with empire THE SCALE FORMULA: month 1-3: recruit 20 girls month 4-6: optimize content month 7-12: $300k/month automated year 2: expand to NYC/LA year 3: sell for $20m to PE fund 3-year exit from credit cards THE DARK PSYCHOLOGY: these girls could do this alone but they won't they need leadership need someone to blame when dad finds out need the infrastructure you're not exploiting you're organizing they were already selling bottle service now they're CEOs making 10x more THE EXACT RECRUITMENT SCRIPT: "hey i know this is random you're exactly the type my agency represents we manage exclusive content creators everything's handled professionally creators keep 10% pure profit most hit $3-5k/month within 90 days here's my card, let's talk monday" success rate: 40% they all call THE CREDIT TO CASH CONVERSION: $150k in business cards approved liquidate through: - plastiq for "rent": 2.85% fee - paypal "consulting": 2.9% fee - square "services": 2.75% fee $150k credit becomes $145k cash fund entire operation at 0% pay minimums from profits THE COMPETITION ELIMINATION: other "managers" take 50% and provide nothing you take 90% but provide everything: - professional content - daily posting - fan management - marketing strategy girls make more with you at 10% than alone at 100% that's why they stay THE EXIT REALITY: building "talent management agency" 30 active models = $500k/month revenue $6m annual agencies sell for 3-5x exit value: $18-30 million from credit cards to 8 figures in 36 months you're either buying bottles like a sucker or building an empire with bank money choose your side Get $100K at 0% APR guaranteed Link in bio → Scale With Credit
0:28

losers spend money on club tables and take home zero girls buying bottles at liv miami trying to impress models who make $500/night when you could be recruiting them for onlyfans with 0% apr tables and take 90% of their revenue... $300k/month from girls you met at clubs here's the onlyfans mafia system destroying simps: every weekend desperate mfs drop $50k cash on tables models pretend to care for 3 hours everyone goes home alone money wasted meanwhile smart operators run different game: THE CREDIT CARD TABLE HACK: get $150k in business funding at 0% apr book owner's tables at tier-1 miami clubs never spend cash - everything on cards earn 300k points while recruiting cards to get approved for today: - chase ink preferred: $30k typical - amex business gold: $50k typical - capital one spark: $40k typical - wells fargo business: $30k typical $150k at 0% in 30 days if you're not stupid THE RECRUITMENT PSYCHOLOGY: table attracts 10-15 models per night they think you're a whale you're not you're a businessman the pitch that converts 40%: "i manage content creators everything's handled - photographer, editor, marketing creators keep 10% pure profit most make $3-5k/month passive here's my portfolio..." show them your roster: girl #1: was bartending at bodega now: $50k/month on OF her take: $5000 your take: $45,000 girl #2: was bottle service at e11even now: $31k/month her take: $3,100 your take: $27,900 they all say yes THE MIAMI CLUB RANKING: recruit here in exact order: 1. liv (fontainebleau) - international models 2. e11even (24/7) - party girls who need money 3. story (south beach) - college girls 4. space (downtown) - underground scene 5. basement (edition) - high-end escorts transitioning wednesday-thursday better than weekends less competition from actual rich guys girls more desperate for attention THE ONLYFANS ASSEMBLY LINE: week 1: professional shoot ($500) week 2: launch with 50 posts ready week 3: tiktok spam campaign week 4: instagram reels push month 2: optimize pricing month 3: $15-30k/month steady your only job: - recruit - manage photographers - collect 90% THE BUSINESS MODEL MATH: monthly costs: - tables: $40k (on 0% cards) - photographer: $8k - editors: $5k (philippines) - shoot apartment: $4k total overhead: $57k 20 girls at $15k average: $300k your 90% cut: $270k monthly profit: $213k started with credit cards ending with empire THE SCALE FORMULA: month 1-3: recruit 20 girls month 4-6: optimize content month 7-12: $300k/month automated year 2: expand to NYC/LA year 3: sell for $20m to PE fund 3-year exit from credit cards THE DARK PSYCHOLOGY: these girls could do this alone but they won't they need leadership need someone to blame when dad finds out need the infrastructure you're not exploiting you're organizing they were already selling bottle service now they're CEOs making 10x more THE EXACT RECRUITMENT SCRIPT: "hey i know this is random you're exactly the type my agency represents we manage exclusive content creators everything's handled professionally creators keep 10% pure profit most hit $3-5k/month within 90 days here's my card, let's talk monday" success rate: 40% they all call THE CREDIT TO CASH CONVERSION: $150k in business cards approved liquidate through: - plastiq for "rent": 2.85% fee - paypal "consulting": 2.9% fee - square "services": 2.75% fee $150k credit becomes $145k cash fund entire operation at 0% pay minimums from profits THE COMPETITION ELIMINATION: other "managers" take 50% and provide nothing you take 90% but provide everything: - professional content - daily posting - fan management - marketing strategy girls make more with you at 10% than alone at 100% that's why they stay THE EXIT REALITY: building "talent management agency" 30 active models = $500k/month revenue $6m annual agencies sell for 3-5x exit value: $18-30 million from credit cards to 8 figures in 36 months you're either buying bottles like a sucker or building an empire with bank money choose your side Get $100K at 0% APR guaranteed Link in bio → Scale With Credit

hunter

15,066 次观看 • 7 个月前

Harry Dry is the best copywriter I know. He's built a 130,000-person newsletter teaching people how to do it, and by the end of this interview, you'll be at least a Green Belt in copywriting. Some of his rules for writing: 1) A great sentence is a good sentence made shorter. 2) Writing great copy begins with having something to say in the first place. 3) Copy is like food. How it looks matters. 4) Since the look of copy matters so much, don't write copy in Google Docs. Write it in Figma (so you can write and design at the same time). 5) Kaplan's Law of Words: Any word that isn't working for you is working against you. 6) You know a paragraph is ready to ship when there's nothing left to remove. It's like a Jenga tower. The entire thing should collapse if you remove something. 7) Make a promise in the title so the reader knows exactly what they're going to get if they click. Then, deliver on the promise. 8) The three laws of copywriting: (1) Make it concrete, (2) make it visual, and (3) make it falsifiable. 9) Make it concrete: Don't be abstract. For an example, say you're writing about habits. Don't talk about "productive routines." That's abstract. Write about "waking up at 6am to write" instead. It's concrete — and much more vibrant. 10) Make it visual: People see in pictures. This is why instead of memorizing card numbers directly, world memory champions memorize cards by turning them into pictures and then back to cards. 11) Make it falsifiable: When you write a sentence that's true or false, you put your head on the chopping block, which makes people sit up in their seat. 12) When has a falsifiable statement resonated? Galileo got sentenced to a decade of house arrest for saying that the earth spins around the sun. That's a falsifiable sentence. But nobody would've done anything if he'd said that the earth has a harmonious connection with a celestial object. 13) Write with the delete key. Using fewer words lets you be more impactful with the words you keep. 14) The job of a sales page is to make a bold claim at the top. Then spend the rest of the page backing up what you've said... with a ridiculous amount of proof. 15) If your competitor could've written the sentence, cut it. 16) Good copy is differentiated. Here's an example: Elon Musk shouldn't write "The Cybertruck is the world's best truck." Ford or Dodge can write that sentence. But only Elon can write: "The Cybertruck is tougher than an F-150 and faster than a Porsche." 17) Some days, the writing comes easily. Some days, it takes sweat. The reader doesn't care if you wrote for two minutes, two hours, or two days. The ink looks the same. 18) Great copy reads like your customer wrote it. Talk to them. That's just an introduction to the copywriting philosophy of Harry Dry. I've shared the full interview below. I recommend you watch this one because we pull from so many visual references and do a lot of screen sharing. If you'd rather watch on YouTube, I've shared the link in the reply tweets.
1:16:05

Harry Dry is the best copywriter I know. He's built a 130,000-person newsletter teaching people how to do it, and by the end of this interview, you'll be at least a Green Belt in copywriting. Some of his rules for writing: 1) A great sentence is a good sentence made shorter. 2) Writing great copy begins with having something to say in the first place. 3) Copy is like food. How it looks matters. 4) Since the look of copy matters so much, don't write copy in Google Docs. Write it in Figma (so you can write and design at the same time). 5) Kaplan's Law of Words: Any word that isn't working for you is working against you. 6) You know a paragraph is ready to ship when there's nothing left to remove. It's like a Jenga tower. The entire thing should collapse if you remove something. 7) Make a promise in the title so the reader knows exactly what they're going to get if they click. Then, deliver on the promise. 8) The three laws of copywriting: (1) Make it concrete, (2) make it visual, and (3) make it falsifiable. 9) Make it concrete: Don't be abstract. For an example, say you're writing about habits. Don't talk about "productive routines." That's abstract. Write about "waking up at 6am to write" instead. It's concrete — and much more vibrant. 10) Make it visual: People see in pictures. This is why instead of memorizing card numbers directly, world memory champions memorize cards by turning them into pictures and then back to cards. 11) Make it falsifiable: When you write a sentence that's true or false, you put your head on the chopping block, which makes people sit up in their seat. 12) When has a falsifiable statement resonated? Galileo got sentenced to a decade of house arrest for saying that the earth spins around the sun. That's a falsifiable sentence. But nobody would've done anything if he'd said that the earth has a harmonious connection with a celestial object. 13) Write with the delete key. Using fewer words lets you be more impactful with the words you keep. 14) The job of a sales page is to make a bold claim at the top. Then spend the rest of the page backing up what you've said... with a ridiculous amount of proof. 15) If your competitor could've written the sentence, cut it. 16) Good copy is differentiated. Here's an example: Elon Musk shouldn't write "The Cybertruck is the world's best truck." Ford or Dodge can write that sentence. But only Elon can write: "The Cybertruck is tougher than an F-150 and faster than a Porsche." 17) Some days, the writing comes easily. Some days, it takes sweat. The reader doesn't care if you wrote for two minutes, two hours, or two days. The ink looks the same. 18) Great copy reads like your customer wrote it. Talk to them. That's just an introduction to the copywriting philosophy of Harry Dry. I've shared the full interview below. I recommend you watch this one because we pull from so many visual references and do a lot of screen sharing. If you'd rather watch on YouTube, I've shared the link in the reply tweets.

David Perell

721,857 次观看 • 2 年前

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,559 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 ISRAELI IP MYSTERY: Google Searches EXPLODED for Charlie Kirk Assassination Key Players WEEKS Before the Hit – Coincidence or Cover-Up? You won't believe this... Right after conservative firebrand Charlie Kirk was gunned down on stage at Utah Valley University on Sept 10, 2025, I dove into Google Trends. What I found? A web of SUSPICIOUS spikes from ISRAELI IP addresses hitting EVERY major figure and detail in the case—MONTHS early. Anchor on July 20, 2025: That's when it all lights up. Here's the bombshell breakdown: 🔍 Suspect Tyler Robinson: Massive DC spike on arrest day (Sept 10), but weird July 20 blip too. Who's pre-gaming this? 🏥 Timpanogos Regional Hospital (Orem, UT): DC searches explode Sept 10-11 for where they rushed Kirk. But hold up—spikes July 16, July 3, even June 28. And the DAY BEFORE the shooting? Someone in DC zeros in. Planning the escape route? 💀 Medical Examiner Dr. Deirdre Amaro: Barely searched in DC or Utah... but ISRAEL? Sudden interest. No autopsy on Kirk? Shady—could've revealed bullet angle, type, other injuries. Why skip it? 🚔 Utah DPS Commissioner Beau Mason: Appointed July 17 (replacing Jess Anderson). DC searches July 16—right in that July 20 window. New sheriff in town... convenient? 🛩️ Spy Plane N1098L (Bombardier Global 6500): This US-contracted jet—capable of deploying DRONES—drops from 50k ft to just 204 ft (stall speed!) over Utah Valley campus TWICE on shooting day: once en route to Montana, once 25 mins AFTER Kirk's death. Flies within 2 miles of the site. ISRAEL searches it Aug 8—32 days pre-hit. Drone strike setup? Videos don't lie. 🕵️ FBI Salt Lake SACs: Old boss Mehtab Syed? Israel hits July 9. New guy Robert Bohls? Sept 1 from Israel. Left blamed Trump/Patel for "firing" Syed— but someone KNEW the switcheroo early. ❓ Hunter Kozak (Last Q&A Guy): Liberal student who grilled Kirk moments before the shot. Israel searches Aug 3. Bullets had "transgender terms"? His roommate's drama? Too on-the-nose. 🩹 Timpanogos Surgeons GALORE: In a 2-week frenzy around July 20, Israel IPs hunted SEVEN docs: Steven Neilman (July 18), Robert Patterson MD (July 23-24), Lee Trotter, Lee Patterson (July 19), Brian Gill (July 22), Richard Rasmussen (July 14), William Pugh (July 30). Why ALL the emergency surgeons at Kirk's hospital? Same IP? FBI, check those VPNs! His body wasn't cold, and the left's screaming "Trump did it." But this? Foreign IPs scouting EVERY angle pre-assassination? If it's one user/VPN, it's a smoking gun. Utah State Police/FBI: Subpoena Google NOW. Who's pulling strings from Tel Aviv? WTF is going on? Drop your theories—share if this chills you. Wake up, America! 🔥 Shoutout to BaronColeman On Youtube Who BROKE This Story. I'll link his FULL Video Below. Go Subscribe To This Man Please, He's Doing Great Work...
20:28

🚨 ISRAELI IP MYSTERY: Google Searches EXPLODED for Charlie Kirk Assassination Key Players WEEKS Before the Hit – Coincidence or Cover-Up? You won't believe this... Right after conservative firebrand Charlie Kirk was gunned down on stage at Utah Valley University on Sept 10, 2025, I dove into Google Trends. What I found? A web of SUSPICIOUS spikes from ISRAELI IP addresses hitting EVERY major figure and detail in the case—MONTHS early. Anchor on July 20, 2025: That's when it all lights up. Here's the bombshell breakdown: 🔍 Suspect Tyler Robinson: Massive DC spike on arrest day (Sept 10), but weird July 20 blip too. Who's pre-gaming this? 🏥 Timpanogos Regional Hospital (Orem, UT): DC searches explode Sept 10-11 for where they rushed Kirk. But hold up—spikes July 16, July 3, even June 28. And the DAY BEFORE the shooting? Someone in DC zeros in. Planning the escape route? 💀 Medical Examiner Dr. Deirdre Amaro: Barely searched in DC or Utah... but ISRAEL? Sudden interest. No autopsy on Kirk? Shady—could've revealed bullet angle, type, other injuries. Why skip it? 🚔 Utah DPS Commissioner Beau Mason: Appointed July 17 (replacing Jess Anderson). DC searches July 16—right in that July 20 window. New sheriff in town... convenient? 🛩️ Spy Plane N1098L (Bombardier Global 6500): This US-contracted jet—capable of deploying DRONES—drops from 50k ft to just 204 ft (stall speed!) over Utah Valley campus TWICE on shooting day: once en route to Montana, once 25 mins AFTER Kirk's death. Flies within 2 miles of the site. ISRAEL searches it Aug 8—32 days pre-hit. Drone strike setup? Videos don't lie. 🕵️ FBI Salt Lake SACs: Old boss Mehtab Syed? Israel hits July 9. New guy Robert Bohls? Sept 1 from Israel. Left blamed Trump/Patel for "firing" Syed— but someone KNEW the switcheroo early. ❓ Hunter Kozak (Last Q&A Guy): Liberal student who grilled Kirk moments before the shot. Israel searches Aug 3. Bullets had "transgender terms"? His roommate's drama? Too on-the-nose. 🩹 Timpanogos Surgeons GALORE: In a 2-week frenzy around July 20, Israel IPs hunted SEVEN docs: Steven Neilman (July 18), Robert Patterson MD (July 23-24), Lee Trotter, Lee Patterson (July 19), Brian Gill (July 22), Richard Rasmussen (July 14), William Pugh (July 30). Why ALL the emergency surgeons at Kirk's hospital? Same IP? FBI, check those VPNs! His body wasn't cold, and the left's screaming "Trump did it." But this? Foreign IPs scouting EVERY angle pre-assassination? If it's one user/VPN, it's a smoking gun. Utah State Police/FBI: Subpoena Google NOW. Who's pulling strings from Tel Aviv? WTF is going on? Drop your theories—share if this chills you. Wake up, America! 🔥 Shoutout to BaronColeman On Youtube Who BROKE This Story. I'll link his FULL Video Below. Go Subscribe To This Man Please, He's Doing Great Work...

Project Constitution

432,545 次观看 • 9 个月前

Dean Koontz has published more than 140 novels, 74 works of short fiction, and sold more than 500 million books. Simply put, he’s one of the most prolific writers alive today. Some highlights from our chat: 1. Dare to love the English language. 2. Characters come alive when they're given free will. Instead of constraining them in an outline, let them go where they want. You know they’re alive once they start surprising you. He says: “I give the characters free will like God gave it to us.” 3. Everything a writer believes about life and death, culture and society, relationships and the self, God and nature will wind up in their books. A writer’s body of work, therefore, reveals the intellectual and emotional progress of its creator, and over time, becomes a map of their soul. 4. To think you understand the world is to be foolish in the extreme. The world is too complex for us to understand it. To see reality clearly is to be utterly enchanted by its staggering complexity. 5. Where should you look? Well, the supernatural enters the world in mundane ways, and rarely the great and glorious flashes of drama. 6. Dean writes his novels page-by-page, and doesn’t move onto the next page until he nails the existing one. There’s no messy first draft. Because of that, he’s basically done with his novels once he finishes the final page. 7. Where does a unique writing voice come from? Three places: style, perspective, and a philosophy of life. 8. Be skeptical of conventional wisdom. There’s an encyclopedia of common wisdom in publishing. All of it is common and none of it is wise. You have to become aware of that, go your own way, and just stick with it because there are so many ways you can be sent wrong based on "that's the way we always do it." 9. The aesthetic plainness of contemporary writing (and culture at large) is crushing our souls. 10. Contemporary fiction is suffering from plainness in particular. It started when writers started imitating Hemingway (who stripped his prose down but kept the mystery and underlying strangeness of the world by implication). But the imitations that came later stripped the prose down while also removing the underlying depth that made Hemingway so great. 11. Koontz Law of Writing #1: Never go inside more than one character's mind in a scene. Each one should come from a singular viewpoint. 12. Koontz Law of Writing #2: Metaphors aren't meant to dazzle readers, but to seduce them into a more intimate relationship with the story. 13. Koontz Law of Writing #3: Metaphors and similes describe a scene more colorfully than a chain of adjectives — while reinforcing the mood. The point is that you can create depth by describing things metaphorically instead of using blunt adjectives. That’s what poetry does: it uses words to say more than the word itself says, which creates a mood. 14. Great prose doesn't come from piling on adjectives. It comes from finding the perfect metaphor that does triple duty: describes the scene, reinforces the mood, and reveals something about the character. 15. The goal is for metaphors not to pop out like showmanship, but to flow into the music of the language. 16. Develop an ear for the musicality of language. 17. A book can succeed with a mediocre plot if the characters are compelling. Character is the center of good fiction. If the characters work, the story works. 18. From the afterword of his book, Watchers: “We have within us the ability to change for the better and to find dignity as individuals rather than as drones in one mass movement or another. We have the ability to love, the need to be loved, and the willingness to put our own lives on the line to protect those we love, and it is in these aspects of ourselves that we can glimpse the face of God; and through the exercise of these qualities, we come closest to a Godlike state.” I've shared the full conversation with Dean Koontz below. The YouTube video link is in the replies, and so are the links to Apple and Spotify.
1:47:18

Dean Koontz has published more than 140 novels, 74 works of short fiction, and sold more than 500 million books. Simply put, he’s one of the most prolific writers alive today. Some highlights from our chat: 1. Dare to love the English language. 2. Characters come alive when they're given free will. Instead of constraining them in an outline, let them go where they want. You know they’re alive once they start surprising you. He says: “I give the characters free will like God gave it to us.” 3. Everything a writer believes about life and death, culture and society, relationships and the self, God and nature will wind up in their books. A writer’s body of work, therefore, reveals the intellectual and emotional progress of its creator, and over time, becomes a map of their soul. 4. To think you understand the world is to be foolish in the extreme. The world is too complex for us to understand it. To see reality clearly is to be utterly enchanted by its staggering complexity. 5. Where should you look? Well, the supernatural enters the world in mundane ways, and rarely the great and glorious flashes of drama. 6. Dean writes his novels page-by-page, and doesn’t move onto the next page until he nails the existing one. There’s no messy first draft. Because of that, he’s basically done with his novels once he finishes the final page. 7. Where does a unique writing voice come from? Three places: style, perspective, and a philosophy of life. 8. Be skeptical of conventional wisdom. There’s an encyclopedia of common wisdom in publishing. All of it is common and none of it is wise. You have to become aware of that, go your own way, and just stick with it because there are so many ways you can be sent wrong based on "that's the way we always do it." 9. The aesthetic plainness of contemporary writing (and culture at large) is crushing our souls. 10. Contemporary fiction is suffering from plainness in particular. It started when writers started imitating Hemingway (who stripped his prose down but kept the mystery and underlying strangeness of the world by implication). But the imitations that came later stripped the prose down while also removing the underlying depth that made Hemingway so great. 11. Koontz Law of Writing #1: Never go inside more than one character's mind in a scene. Each one should come from a singular viewpoint. 12. Koontz Law of Writing #2: Metaphors aren't meant to dazzle readers, but to seduce them into a more intimate relationship with the story. 13. Koontz Law of Writing #3: Metaphors and similes describe a scene more colorfully than a chain of adjectives — while reinforcing the mood. The point is that you can create depth by describing things metaphorically instead of using blunt adjectives. That’s what poetry does: it uses words to say more than the word itself says, which creates a mood. 14. Great prose doesn't come from piling on adjectives. It comes from finding the perfect metaphor that does triple duty: describes the scene, reinforces the mood, and reveals something about the character. 15. The goal is for metaphors not to pop out like showmanship, but to flow into the music of the language. 16. Develop an ear for the musicality of language. 17. A book can succeed with a mediocre plot if the characters are compelling. Character is the center of good fiction. If the characters work, the story works. 18. From the afterword of his book, Watchers: “We have within us the ability to change for the better and to find dignity as individuals rather than as drones in one mass movement or another. We have the ability to love, the need to be loved, and the willingness to put our own lives on the line to protect those we love, and it is in these aspects of ourselves that we can glimpse the face of God; and through the exercise of these qualities, we come closest to a Godlike state.” I've shared the full conversation with Dean Koontz below. The YouTube video link is in the replies, and so are the links to Apple and Spotify.

David Perell

74,956 次观看 • 1 年前

Morgan Housel has written 4,000 blog posts and sold 4 million copies of The Psychology of Money. As a writer, he's the best storyteller I know too. Here are his principles for writing: 1. Leave out the parts that readers tend to skip. 2. Writing is an efficiency game. Whoever says the most stuff in the fewest words wins. 3. You have five seconds to catch somebody's attention on the Internet. If you didn't catch them with the headline or in the first two sentences, they're gone. 4. If you're stuck on a piece, go for a walk. 5. If an idea comes to you while you're out walking, email it to yourself immediately. 6. People don’t remember books; they remember sentences. 7. A good story is like leverage for ideas. An idea on its own might be boring, but if you tell a good story about someone interacting with that idea, you can get people to nod their heads and pay attention. 8. Great writing begins with great reading. 9. If you want to write better and more memorable sentences, ask yourself: "If somebody was reading this on Kindle, would they highlight this sentence?" If the answer is no, consider removing it. 10. Everyone should write. Why? Because everyone is full of ideas they’re not aware of. This means they’re also unaware of the value of their ideas, and this value can only be unlocked via writing. 11. Start with one brave sentence and see where it goes. 12. Big words mask little thoughts. They’re an attempt to fool the reader into thinking you’re smart when you have nothing smart to say. 13. Writing for others is work, and it shows. Writing for yourself is fun, and it shows. 14. Morgan calls this Selfish Writing: write to solve your own problems, and the audience will get pulled in because of your emotional involvement. But if you pander to the audience, they will sense your lingering indifference, and leave. 15. The Power Law of Success: if you do 30 things, 29 of them are going to be irrelevant. One of them will completely change everything. Keep writing—volume is your friend. 16. Most books, even by proven authors, are flops. Mark Twain wrote 28 novels. You haven't heard of most of them, but that doesn't matter because he wrote two classics: "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer" and "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn." 17. Mark Twain used to read aloud to his family and watch their reactions. If he saw them getting bored, he’d cut that part out. If he saw them getting excited, he’d double down on that section. 18. Success takes time. Don’t rush it. Morgan spent 14 years as a professional writer before he published his first book. In that time, he wrote more than 4,000 blog posts. 19. Morgan tells the story of two trees. One grows in the shade of a mother tree, growing slowly because the sunlight is cut off. The other, planted in a field with no barrier, receives full sunlight and grows faster. But the first one develops denser wood due to the slower rate of growth. There’s a natural growth rate in nature, and in creative pursuits. 20. Make your writing concise. 21. Concise does not mean short. It means a high density of value to words. Okay, one more... Out of all our conversations, one interaction stands out because it so eloquently captures the essence of his approach. When I asked about his marketing strategy for selling books, he said: "Write a good book." "Well, how do you do that?" "Only write things that you personally find interesting." I've shared the full interview with Morgan Housel below. He's been writing for a decade and a half, and this interview is a deep-dive into his process for coming up with ideas, refining them, sharing them, and building a career as an author. If you'd rather listen on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple, check out the replies below…
2:03:11

Morgan Housel has written 4,000 blog posts and sold 4 million copies of The Psychology of Money. As a writer, he's the best storyteller I know too. Here are his principles for writing: 1. Leave out the parts that readers tend to skip. 2. Writing is an efficiency game. Whoever says the most stuff in the fewest words wins. 3. You have five seconds to catch somebody's attention on the Internet. If you didn't catch them with the headline or in the first two sentences, they're gone. 4. If you're stuck on a piece, go for a walk. 5. If an idea comes to you while you're out walking, email it to yourself immediately. 6. People don’t remember books; they remember sentences. 7. A good story is like leverage for ideas. An idea on its own might be boring, but if you tell a good story about someone interacting with that idea, you can get people to nod their heads and pay attention. 8. Great writing begins with great reading. 9. If you want to write better and more memorable sentences, ask yourself: "If somebody was reading this on Kindle, would they highlight this sentence?" If the answer is no, consider removing it. 10. Everyone should write. Why? Because everyone is full of ideas they’re not aware of. This means they’re also unaware of the value of their ideas, and this value can only be unlocked via writing. 11. Start with one brave sentence and see where it goes. 12. Big words mask little thoughts. They’re an attempt to fool the reader into thinking you’re smart when you have nothing smart to say. 13. Writing for others is work, and it shows. Writing for yourself is fun, and it shows. 14. Morgan calls this Selfish Writing: write to solve your own problems, and the audience will get pulled in because of your emotional involvement. But if you pander to the audience, they will sense your lingering indifference, and leave. 15. The Power Law of Success: if you do 30 things, 29 of them are going to be irrelevant. One of them will completely change everything. Keep writing—volume is your friend. 16. Most books, even by proven authors, are flops. Mark Twain wrote 28 novels. You haven't heard of most of them, but that doesn't matter because he wrote two classics: "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer" and "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn." 17. Mark Twain used to read aloud to his family and watch their reactions. If he saw them getting bored, he’d cut that part out. If he saw them getting excited, he’d double down on that section. 18. Success takes time. Don’t rush it. Morgan spent 14 years as a professional writer before he published his first book. In that time, he wrote more than 4,000 blog posts. 19. Morgan tells the story of two trees. One grows in the shade of a mother tree, growing slowly because the sunlight is cut off. The other, planted in a field with no barrier, receives full sunlight and grows faster. But the first one develops denser wood due to the slower rate of growth. There’s a natural growth rate in nature, and in creative pursuits. 20. Make your writing concise. 21. Concise does not mean short. It means a high density of value to words. Okay, one more... Out of all our conversations, one interaction stands out because it so eloquently captures the essence of his approach. When I asked about his marketing strategy for selling books, he said: "Write a good book." "Well, how do you do that?" "Only write things that you personally find interesting." I've shared the full interview with Morgan Housel below. He's been writing for a decade and a half, and this interview is a deep-dive into his process for coming up with ideas, refining them, sharing them, and building a career as an author. If you'd rather listen on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple, check out the replies below…

David Perell

356,130 次观看 • 2 年前

Porter Stansberry turned $36,000 into $3,000,000,000 by writing financial research… after his future business partner fired him... Here's what I learned from Porter Stansberry about writing and selling financial research: 1. Hierarchy of Information Value: In the crowded financial information space, Porter stands out by providing clear, actionable advice, pushing against conventional views. “The news is free because it tells you what happened. Newsletters are expensive because they tell you what to do about it.” 2. Masterful Financial Storytelling: Porter's a master storyteller. He unearths captivating historical tales, dripping with human drama, and seamlessly melds them with modern investment concepts. A voracious reader, Porter often devours a book a day. These stories make his content addictive, easy to grasp, and unforgettable. 3. Creating 'Eureka Moments': Porter leads his readers to conclusions without explicitly stating them. For instance, consider his story about Shelby Davis, who transformed $50,000 into a billion dollars through passive investments in property and casualty insurance stocks. Porter doesn't tell you it's a fantastic business model; he shows you. These "Eureka Moments" are not only enjoyable to read but also encourage independent thinking, fostering loyal readership. 4. In-depth Research: Porter's best investment ideas come from his network of industry specialists he’s in constant contact with. These include a deep talent roster within his companies and a network of external contacts he shares ideas with. Porter strives to cover only topics where he’s had 3-4 conversations with industry insiders, adding depth and credibility to his work. 5. Clear and Simple Writing: To make his ideas more accessible, Porter writes to a novice reading level. He focuses on straightforward, active language (No passive voice), using short, simple sentences. Porter meticulously edits and rewrites. His epic 'End of America' went through 15 versions before selling over 500,000 subscriptions. Porter also prefers clear sentences over excessive visuals. 6. Effective Promotion: Porter’s marketing and research follow the same approach: every sentence engages and adds value. His campaigns tackle big, important issues that affect readers’ lives. Successful campaigns are amplified through collaboration with other publishers. 7. Ethical Standards: For Porter, having a great track record of recommendations is the ultimate skin-in-the-game. Not trading in the securities he covers helps him maintain objectivity, avoid conflicts, and lessen legal risk. 8. Full Tilt Dedication: Porter swears by one way of doing investment research: "Full tilt." His success is a testament to his intense work ethic and decades of relentless trial and error. Don't miss the full interview with Porter Stansberry below, where he delves into his personal journey, the challenges of Marketwise's IPO, and his perspective on current market dynamics. For past stories on Porter, a link to a YouTube interview, and a transcript, check out the replies. Follow me for more insights on finance and investing! TIMESTAMPS: Going Viral in Zimbabwe 01:50 Inflation Consequences 04:48 Writing "End of America" 10:46 Beginnings in Finance 3:02 Adoption Story 17:04 Agora Firing 22:16 Launching Newsletter 24:29 $3 Billion Handshake 28:25 Bill Bonner's Lesson 30:06 Marketwise's 'Ill-Begotten IPO' 34:13 Spooling Up Porter & Co 42:37 $MKTW Stock 44:19 Vision for Marketwise 46:27 Newsletter Business Model 48:40 Wall Street Talk 53:38 Writing Secrets 57:37 Screening Investments 1:03:13 Boston Blackout 1:07:34 History's Biggest Bubble 1:14:39 Finding Safe Haven 1:15:59 Jim Rogers 1:18:10 Commodities Outlook 1:20:58 Idiotic Taxation 1:28:04 Living in Baltimore 1:31:14 Barn-Work 1:32:43
1:33:41

Porter Stansberry turned $36,000 into $3,000,000,000 by writing financial research… after his future business partner fired him... Here's what I learned from Porter Stansberry about writing and selling financial research: 1. Hierarchy of Information Value: In the crowded financial information space, Porter stands out by providing clear, actionable advice, pushing against conventional views. “The news is free because it tells you what happened. Newsletters are expensive because they tell you what to do about it.” 2. Masterful Financial Storytelling: Porter's a master storyteller. He unearths captivating historical tales, dripping with human drama, and seamlessly melds them with modern investment concepts. A voracious reader, Porter often devours a book a day. These stories make his content addictive, easy to grasp, and unforgettable. 3. Creating 'Eureka Moments': Porter leads his readers to conclusions without explicitly stating them. For instance, consider his story about Shelby Davis, who transformed $50,000 into a billion dollars through passive investments in property and casualty insurance stocks. Porter doesn't tell you it's a fantastic business model; he shows you. These "Eureka Moments" are not only enjoyable to read but also encourage independent thinking, fostering loyal readership. 4. In-depth Research: Porter's best investment ideas come from his network of industry specialists he’s in constant contact with. These include a deep talent roster within his companies and a network of external contacts he shares ideas with. Porter strives to cover only topics where he’s had 3-4 conversations with industry insiders, adding depth and credibility to his work. 5. Clear and Simple Writing: To make his ideas more accessible, Porter writes to a novice reading level. He focuses on straightforward, active language (No passive voice), using short, simple sentences. Porter meticulously edits and rewrites. His epic 'End of America' went through 15 versions before selling over 500,000 subscriptions. Porter also prefers clear sentences over excessive visuals. 6. Effective Promotion: Porter’s marketing and research follow the same approach: every sentence engages and adds value. His campaigns tackle big, important issues that affect readers’ lives. Successful campaigns are amplified through collaboration with other publishers. 7. Ethical Standards: For Porter, having a great track record of recommendations is the ultimate skin-in-the-game. Not trading in the securities he covers helps him maintain objectivity, avoid conflicts, and lessen legal risk. 8. Full Tilt Dedication: Porter swears by one way of doing investment research: "Full tilt." His success is a testament to his intense work ethic and decades of relentless trial and error. Don't miss the full interview with Porter Stansberry below, where he delves into his personal journey, the challenges of Marketwise's IPO, and his perspective on current market dynamics. For past stories on Porter, a link to a YouTube interview, and a transcript, check out the replies. Follow me for more insights on finance and investing! TIMESTAMPS: Going Viral in Zimbabwe 01:50 Inflation Consequences 04:48 Writing "End of America" 10:46 Beginnings in Finance 3:02 Adoption Story 17:04 Agora Firing 22:16 Launching Newsletter 24:29 $3 Billion Handshake 28:25 Bill Bonner's Lesson 30:06 Marketwise's 'Ill-Begotten IPO' 34:13 Spooling Up Porter & Co 42:37 $MKTW Stock 44:19 Vision for Marketwise 46:27 Newsletter Business Model 48:40 Wall Street Talk 53:38 Writing Secrets 57:37 Screening Investments 1:03:13 Boston Blackout 1:07:34 History's Biggest Bubble 1:14:39 Finding Safe Haven 1:15:59 Jim Rogers 1:18:10 Commodities Outlook 1:20:58 Idiotic Taxation 1:28:04 Living in Baltimore 1:31:14 Barn-Work 1:32:43

Tommy Humphreys

417,651 次观看 • 2 年前

Tiago Forte has pioneered the concept of a Second Brain. As the author of two books, he's learned that quantity and quality aren't opposing forces. Here's what else he's taught me about writing: 1. The brain is for having ideas, not storing them. Write stuff down. 2. If you really want to learn something, don't just consume information. Create something about it. 3. Note-taking is a form of time-travel. You don’t just take notes to remember ideas. You also take notes to remember experiences. Reading your notes takes you back to a different state of consciousness. Note-taking is a rebellion against the entropy of memory. 4. Save only the best notes: Don't hoard information. Save only the top 5-10% of your ideas. That way, you can trust that everything in your note-taking system is high-quality. 5. Tiago’s dad is an artist who taught him an important lesson: the energy to create art can dissipate in small, invisible ways if you let it. Set up a structure where you have the peace of mind and the bandwidth to do art. 6. The ultimate goal of note-taking is to improve your ideas. Too many people treat note-taking as an end in itself. But the goal of note-taking isn’t to save information. It’s to have ideas you wouldn’t have had otherwise. To be smarter, faster, and more creative. 7. Link notes together. Organize your ideas by topic, not by source. As you browse your note-taking system, consider the serendipity you want to create for your future self. For example, if you read two books about a topic, link those notes together. 8. In school, we’re taught to research before we write. Do the opposite. Compile notes over time. Then, once you have an idea, start writing immediately — right when you have an epiphany. Start researching after you've written a draft. 9. Create evergreen notes. Like a good investment, the benefits of your note-taking system should compound in value. Save ideas that will stay relevant for many years. Read the classics, skip the news. 10. Tiago publicly tested every idea in his book. For most, the internet is a blackhole of distraction. But it can instead be used as a place to do low-stakes experiments before you go all in. 11. The more expensive the location for a writer's retreat, the more it forces you to be productive. 12. "Be regular and orderly in your life, so that you may be violent and original in your work." — Gustave Flaubert, one of Tiago's favorite quotes. 13. The less formal and “official” a software program feels, the better Tiago writes. And he believes some of the best turns of phrase come out in messaging apps with friends. Stuck on something? Close the word doc and text a friend about it. 14. Every time you compress an idea, you make it more accessible. But you also lose context, depth, and nuance. 15. The ultimate test of how well you understand something is how clearly you can explain it in writing — clear writers are clear thinkers. 16. Twitter can help too. Stuck on a paragraph while writing your book? Well, send a tweet about it. If the idea resonates, bring it into your book. 17. Too many choices can cloud our creative process. The key to making progress is knowing when to take in new information and when to shut off all sources of distraction. Divergence and Convergence. 18. Anything you might want to accomplish—executing a project at work, getting a new job, learning a new skill, starting a business—requires finding and putting to use the right information. 19. Instead of working in “Heavy Lifts,” you can work in “Slow Burns.” Taking notes makes you less dependent on those long blocks of creative time you need when you have to complete creative projects in a single sitting. 20. Tiago: “If I could leave you with one last bit of advice, it is to chase what excites you.” 21. A bonus: “Run after your obsessions with everything you have. Just be sure to take notes along the way.” I've shared the full conversation with Tiago Forte here. If you'd rather listen on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple, check out the replies below.
1:02:33

Tiago Forte has pioneered the concept of a Second Brain. As the author of two books, he's learned that quantity and quality aren't opposing forces. Here's what else he's taught me about writing: 1. The brain is for having ideas, not storing them. Write stuff down. 2. If you really want to learn something, don't just consume information. Create something about it. 3. Note-taking is a form of time-travel. You don’t just take notes to remember ideas. You also take notes to remember experiences. Reading your notes takes you back to a different state of consciousness. Note-taking is a rebellion against the entropy of memory. 4. Save only the best notes: Don't hoard information. Save only the top 5-10% of your ideas. That way, you can trust that everything in your note-taking system is high-quality. 5. Tiago’s dad is an artist who taught him an important lesson: the energy to create art can dissipate in small, invisible ways if you let it. Set up a structure where you have the peace of mind and the bandwidth to do art. 6. The ultimate goal of note-taking is to improve your ideas. Too many people treat note-taking as an end in itself. But the goal of note-taking isn’t to save information. It’s to have ideas you wouldn’t have had otherwise. To be smarter, faster, and more creative. 7. Link notes together. Organize your ideas by topic, not by source. As you browse your note-taking system, consider the serendipity you want to create for your future self. For example, if you read two books about a topic, link those notes together. 8. In school, we’re taught to research before we write. Do the opposite. Compile notes over time. Then, once you have an idea, start writing immediately — right when you have an epiphany. Start researching after you've written a draft. 9. Create evergreen notes. Like a good investment, the benefits of your note-taking system should compound in value. Save ideas that will stay relevant for many years. Read the classics, skip the news. 10. Tiago publicly tested every idea in his book. For most, the internet is a blackhole of distraction. But it can instead be used as a place to do low-stakes experiments before you go all in. 11. The more expensive the location for a writer's retreat, the more it forces you to be productive. 12. "Be regular and orderly in your life, so that you may be violent and original in your work." — Gustave Flaubert, one of Tiago's favorite quotes. 13. The less formal and “official” a software program feels, the better Tiago writes. And he believes some of the best turns of phrase come out in messaging apps with friends. Stuck on something? Close the word doc and text a friend about it. 14. Every time you compress an idea, you make it more accessible. But you also lose context, depth, and nuance. 15. The ultimate test of how well you understand something is how clearly you can explain it in writing — clear writers are clear thinkers. 16. Twitter can help too. Stuck on a paragraph while writing your book? Well, send a tweet about it. If the idea resonates, bring it into your book. 17. Too many choices can cloud our creative process. The key to making progress is knowing when to take in new information and when to shut off all sources of distraction. Divergence and Convergence. 18. Anything you might want to accomplish—executing a project at work, getting a new job, learning a new skill, starting a business—requires finding and putting to use the right information. 19. Instead of working in “Heavy Lifts,” you can work in “Slow Burns.” Taking notes makes you less dependent on those long blocks of creative time you need when you have to complete creative projects in a single sitting. 20. Tiago: “If I could leave you with one last bit of advice, it is to chase what excites you.” 21. A bonus: “Run after your obsessions with everything you have. Just be sure to take notes along the way.” I've shared the full conversation with Tiago Forte here. If you'd rather listen on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple, check out the replies below.

David Perell

101,346 次观看 • 2 年前

The world of writing has changed forever. AI is getting really good, really fast. ChatGPT is already a better writer than most humans and some professional writers. So, what’s the future of writing? 18 thoughts from Tyler Cowen: 1) Don't let AI smooth out your idiosyncrasies. Let your writing stay weird and uniquely yours. 2) Generic content is dying and the burden is on you as the writer to be distinctive. 3) The more personal your writing becomes, the more future-proof it is. Nobody wants to read memoirs from AI, even if they're technically "better." 4) Use AI as your secondary literature when you read — not just for quick answers, but as a thinking companion. As Tyler puts it, "I'll keep on asking the AI: 'What do you think of chapter two? What happened there? What are some puzzles?' It just gets me thinking... and I'm smarter about the thing in the final analysis." 5) Hallucinations aren't the crisis everyone makes them out to be. No matter the source, if you're going to use a piece of information, you should double-check it. This is true for both books and AI. 6) Secrets will become more valuable in an AI-driven world. 7) One way to use AI as a writer is to research fields you aren't as familiar with before you start writing about them. Tyler said: "I just wrote a column about declassifying classified documents. I don't know that law very well. I asked the AI for a lot of background... now I feel like I'm not an idiot on the topic." 8) AI changes what books are even worth writing. "Predictive books and books about the near future. They don't make sense to write anymore." 9) Editing trick: Try running your writing through AI and asking what some people might find obnoxious. It’s a surprisingly powerful editing trick. 10) When prompting AI, put humans out of your mind and imagine you're talking to an alien or a non-human animal. 11) Many of the most significant AI advancements are likely happening behind closed doors. For example, I hear that Google allows employees to use Gemini with virtually unlimited context windows. 12) What possibilities do large context windows open up? Researchers will be able to load entire regulatory frameworks, historical archives, or massive datasets like "tax records from Renaissance Florence" into a single query. 13) The rate of AI improvement matters more than its current capabilities. As Tyler puts it, "This is the worst they will ever be" is key to understanding their trajectory. "A lot of people don't get that. They're impressed by what they see in the moment, but they don't understand the rate of improvement." 14) The best way to appreciate the current rate of improvement is to use the latest models. 15) Being non-technical can sometimes be an advantage when thinking about AI. Here’s Tyler: "If you're not focused on the technical side, you will see other things more clearly... You just focus on what is this actually good for? And not, am I impressed by all the neat bells and whistles on this advance with AI?" 16) How Tyler uses AI to prep for podcast interviews: Don't waste time asking AI for generic interview questions or broad topics. Tyler says that's the worst question you can ask an AI. It’s “too normy.” Instead, ask specific questions about historical examples and get context. Then, let your own creative questions emerge. 17) Your relationship with mentors and peers becomes more crucial, not less, in an AI world. "Two pieces of general advice with or without AI in the world." Tyler says: "Get more and better mentors and work every day at improving the quality of your peer network." 18) The divide between AI and humans creates a striking paradox. As Tyler puts it: "On one hand the AIs are getting so much better, so learn how to use the AIs. On the other hand, the AIs are getting so much better, so invest in these other things that aren't AI—pure networks. You've gotta do both." I've shared the full conversation with tylercowen below. In the replies, I've also linked to a full transcript and relevant links to YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts if you want to listen there. And if you want a bite-size entry to the episode, I've shared some clips in the replies too.
1:09:02

The world of writing has changed forever. AI is getting really good, really fast. ChatGPT is already a better writer than most humans and some professional writers. So, what’s the future of writing? 18 thoughts from Tyler Cowen: 1) Don't let AI smooth out your idiosyncrasies. Let your writing stay weird and uniquely yours. 2) Generic content is dying and the burden is on you as the writer to be distinctive. 3) The more personal your writing becomes, the more future-proof it is. Nobody wants to read memoirs from AI, even if they're technically "better." 4) Use AI as your secondary literature when you read — not just for quick answers, but as a thinking companion. As Tyler puts it, "I'll keep on asking the AI: 'What do you think of chapter two? What happened there? What are some puzzles?' It just gets me thinking... and I'm smarter about the thing in the final analysis." 5) Hallucinations aren't the crisis everyone makes them out to be. No matter the source, if you're going to use a piece of information, you should double-check it. This is true for both books and AI. 6) Secrets will become more valuable in an AI-driven world. 7) One way to use AI as a writer is to research fields you aren't as familiar with before you start writing about them. Tyler said: "I just wrote a column about declassifying classified documents. I don't know that law very well. I asked the AI for a lot of background... now I feel like I'm not an idiot on the topic." 8) AI changes what books are even worth writing. "Predictive books and books about the near future. They don't make sense to write anymore." 9) Editing trick: Try running your writing through AI and asking what some people might find obnoxious. It’s a surprisingly powerful editing trick. 10) When prompting AI, put humans out of your mind and imagine you're talking to an alien or a non-human animal. 11) Many of the most significant AI advancements are likely happening behind closed doors. For example, I hear that Google allows employees to use Gemini with virtually unlimited context windows. 12) What possibilities do large context windows open up? Researchers will be able to load entire regulatory frameworks, historical archives, or massive datasets like "tax records from Renaissance Florence" into a single query. 13) The rate of AI improvement matters more than its current capabilities. As Tyler puts it, "This is the worst they will ever be" is key to understanding their trajectory. "A lot of people don't get that. They're impressed by what they see in the moment, but they don't understand the rate of improvement." 14) The best way to appreciate the current rate of improvement is to use the latest models. 15) Being non-technical can sometimes be an advantage when thinking about AI. Here’s Tyler: "If you're not focused on the technical side, you will see other things more clearly... You just focus on what is this actually good for? And not, am I impressed by all the neat bells and whistles on this advance with AI?" 16) How Tyler uses AI to prep for podcast interviews: Don't waste time asking AI for generic interview questions or broad topics. Tyler says that's the worst question you can ask an AI. It’s “too normy.” Instead, ask specific questions about historical examples and get context. Then, let your own creative questions emerge. 17) Your relationship with mentors and peers becomes more crucial, not less, in an AI world. "Two pieces of general advice with or without AI in the world." Tyler says: "Get more and better mentors and work every day at improving the quality of your peer network." 18) The divide between AI and humans creates a striking paradox. As Tyler puts it: "On one hand the AIs are getting so much better, so learn how to use the AIs. On the other hand, the AIs are getting so much better, so invest in these other things that aren't AI—pure networks. You've gotta do both." I've shared the full conversation with tylercowen below. In the replies, I've also linked to a full transcript and relevant links to YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts if you want to listen there. And if you want a bite-size entry to the episode, I've shared some clips in the replies too.

David Perell

175,011 次观看 • 1 年前