Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Quick update from a recent press conference held about the Stardust Racers incident. Along with the video of an interesting exchange about guidelines, I have other notes from that morning: • Attorney Crump says that their team of experts have the right to inspect Stardust Racers and were in...

14,897 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Attorney Ben Crump, along with the family of Nolan Wells, addressed the media today after meeting with Jackson County District Attorney Angel Myers Mollrath. One thing Crump is not forthcoming about is that sending this to the grand jury is standard procedure for any unnatural or suspicious death in Jackson County. (Remember when I said they love to keep the uneducated, uneducated?) According to the Jackson County District Attorney’s Office: “Once the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office investigation into Nolan’s death is complete, the district attorney’s office will present the case to a grand jury. That is standard procedure for most unnatural or suspicious deaths in Jackson County.” This should not be interpreted as evidence that criminal charges are imminent. It is the normal process. This is likely because alcohol was involved. Also, just a side note: based on what was said publicly today, it appears they have not yet completed their own forensic review of Nolan Wells’ cellphone and are treating that examination as something that still needs to happen. Ben Crump announced that there will be a “mutual inspection” of the phone involving both law enforcement and independent experts retained by the family. That announcement strongly suggests they are not yet in a position to make definitive claims about everything that is - or is not - on the device. Yet Ben Crump has done nothing but spread wild accusations regarding Nolan’s death before the very forensic examination he now says will take place. In my opinion, that is completely unbefitting of an attorney.

Sarah Fields

98,376 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Prosecutors in the case of Massachusetts man Bryan Walshe have confirmed on the record in open court that the federal probe into the death of John O'Keefe is over! The Judge in the case, herself, then also confirmed that the "investigation is not [still] going on" after reading a letter provided to the court by those prosecutors (who were, themselves, contacted directly by the US Attorney and told the federal O'Keefe investigation is over). It was all true. The Karen Read trial has come to it's stunning conclusion. For context: One of the Troopers involved in investigating Walshe (Michael Proctor) was brought up in the Walshe trial over recent months by the defense, and, in turn, that led to the moment in court today. The Judge asked prosecutors to explain if there was any changes related to a previous Touhy request sent to the federal government and, in turn, the prosecutor said there was an update from the US Attorney directly to the prosecutor's office (that was given to defense counsel yesterday). That update, in turn, confirms the end of the federal probe of John O'Keefe's death (as the prosecutor made direct reference to U.S. Attorney Massachusetts, US Attorney Foley, and Foley's interview with Dan Rea on Tuesday of this week, wherein US Attorney Foley said it would not be a violation of DOJ policy for the US Attorney to tell Law Enforcement partners about the status of, or updates related to, an investigation). "[US Attorney Foley] said it is not uncommon for law enforcement partners to be notified of the status of an investigation. My office was notified by the US Attorney's Office and I provided that to defense counsel," said the prosecutor on Walshe's case. An ongoing federal protective order related to the O'Keefe materials, that will remain active even though the investigation is over, may have some impact in the Walshe case (and the Judge discussed that as well). See my video analysis (and the full clip from court today) below. The news, first broken by BillMcEntyre (and then confirmed by Ted Daniel and Kristina Rex) is now part of the history books.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,974 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 JUST IN: DC Draino respectfully pressures the White House on where the remaining EPSTEIN FILES are and if she has any timeline on their release - AND "when we might start seeing some arrests." This is in the new media press briefing. DC_Draino: "A couple months ago, the DOJ released what they called 'Phase One' of the Epstein files. And they announced that a lot of those files, the remaining files, probably the bulk of the files, are actually in the New York field office." "They requested that they be returned the day after, and some legacy media reports show that not only were those files returned to the DOJ, but that hundreds of FBI agents are going through them day after day and getting them ready for public release." "Do you have any updates from the DOJ or the FBI on when those files are expected to be released, and also when we might start seeing some arrests of the client list?" LEAVITT: "I can assure you that the attorney general and her team at the Department of Justice are working on this diligently. For a specific timeline, I'd have to check in with them. And we can certainly do that for you, Rogan, in the effort of transparency." "I will tell you: the Attorney General is a bulldog. She is someone you want on your team. And when she wants to get something done, she gets it done. I've seen her do it in various instances already in her time as Attorney General." "And when she makes a promise, she keeps it. I don't have a specific timeline on you for that, but I do, know that they're working on it over there. This is the 2nd solid question from DC Draino at the White House today, leagues above the significance of other Legacy Media questions.

Eric Daugherty

959,144 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Megyn Kelly exclusive where she reveals comments from Trump's lawyers as to why they think ABC and George Stephanopoulos settled for 15 million: Megyn Kelly: "Our Producer spoke with Trump's attorney, Alejandro Brito. And here is what he said. Our question was why did ABC decide to settle? The long and short of it? Is the nature of the claims that were brought and the fact that they were verifiable from a standpoint as factually untrue from George Stephanopoulos. Trump's legal team had separate video clips of George Stephanopoulos on ABC that showed Stephanopoulos knew that Trump had not been found liable for rape." "Was there something this is us in discovery that scared ABC into settling." "Answer the possibility of something coming out in discovery may have had led to the settlement. Trump legal team had scheduled to take the deposition of ABC and ABC Rep and George Stephanopoulos. The lawyer, suspects ABC did not want it to happen. Quote, It wasn't something ABC learned that caused them to settle, but rather something Trump's team may learn. Trump team was waiting on ABC and Stephanopoulos to respond to discovery demands. He said At the time of the settlement, ABC had only produced one piece of paper and, quote, very interesting and not provided any other documentation. And he believes fear of what Trump could learn about ABC and Stephanopoulos and document exchange may have played a role in the settlement." ABC would rather pay 15 million dollars than allow Trump and the public to discover how corrupt they are.

Eric Abbenante

579,426 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“I also want to acknowledge to this Court and Ms. Read that I was mistaken when I interpreted her words to say ‘I’m dead. I’m fucking dead.’” - Attorney Marc Diller, 3/6/26 Well… that’s one way to end a week. After filing it, italicizing it in a motion so it would stand out to the Court, defending it in multiple pleadings and trying to explain it away once the audio started circulating publicly… Marc Diller walked into court today and admitted he got it wrong. The hearing itself started with a sidebar, where the attorneys spent quite a bit of time in a private conference with the judge. The attorneys then went into a room by themselves where they conferred with one another. When everyone came back on the record, Diller announced that the plaintiffs were withdrawing their TRO motion entirely. Instead, the parties agreed to work expeditiously and in good faith on a stipulation regarding the handling of Karen Read’s phones before they are returned to her custody. If they can’t come to an agreement on that protocol, the issue will go right back in front of the court. Importantly, the existing preservation order and prior agreements remain in place. Nothing about that changed. Another key point that came out of the hearing: anything related to the phones will now go through Read’s legal team first. Her attorneys will handle the review and extraction process, and while the plaintiffs can make suggestions about what they believe is relevant, the ultimate decisions remain with Read’s team. Which brings us back to the quote. Because let’s not forget how this whole thing started. The phrase “I’m dead. I’m fucking dead.” wasn’t buried somewhere in a filing. It was front and center, highlighted and emphasized as part of the argument for why the court should step in and block Karen Read from getting her property back. It was presented as if it were a direct, incriminating statement. And today, in open court, the attorney who put that quote into the record acknowledged that he misinterpreted it. 🗣 The motion built around that argument was fully withdrawn with Diller tucking his tail admitting that he was wrong. Sometimes the loudest accusations end with the quietest admissions.

BoozeyBeauty

36,112 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

From earlier this morning, Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine’s update on the two airmen rescued in Iran... “We’ve had — the Secretary and I have had the profound honor of speaking directly with many of the warfighters on that mission, from the downed crew that that were picked up to those forces that went and got them. Hearing these stories firsthand has only deepened our appreciation for their tenacity, creativity, courage, and grit of the American Joint Force. This is a story that gets to the very heart and soul of who we are as a joint force, who we are as Americans. Selfless sacrifice in service of others. From the back seater, Dude 44 Bravo, whose pure and unadulterated joy at seeing those helicopters come into the valley to get his front seater in daylight because he knew the front seater did not have a jacket and was so filled with heart leaping joy at his front seater, getting picked up to the nighttime folks that went in and then got him to the tanker forces that did the things that they had to do to give their own gas away to the support packages, to those that went into the desert landing site not once, not twice, but three times as we fought through multiple contingencies. This was and is a joint force that has the guts to try, that does not quit, and who each and every day does the things that we must to dare to win. No lives were lost. We succeeded because the Joint Force is always at the ready. They trust each other, they trust their leaders and they trust their training. And they remember first and foremost and always, that we do these things so that others may live. And we will never leave anyone behind.”

Curtis Houck

63,742 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

TeamSESH is dq'd from Challenger Series after qualifying for the event Q4 Game 1 enemy team protests for Kixa's moss based on the attached video as "proof of cheating". One of the guys on the other team admitted to us in dms that the protest was just cuz they were mad they lost. Head admin pauses our next game and makes us open a ticket; he requests moss from each of us. None of us had it for this first game because we agreed with the other team to not run it prior to the game (aforementioned player who dm'd Kixa was his friend). He then requests moss from all of us from our entire qual. I did not run moss on every game, given some games were against ppl I have played a thousand times and did not feel the need. Regardless this disqualification was from me not running moss for this qualifier. The admins did not care that we had provided dozens of previous moss files from our recent win in XGS and OCS. I understand that they felt they must make this ruling in order to stay in line with their rule book. I still feel that the way in which this was conducted was not within their own rule book given scrupulous evidence and requiring us all to provide moss for the report of one player. Regardless, I was in the wrong for not running it and have to accept that I costed my teams ability to show how hard we worked for this. Everyone with half a brain knows that we do not cheat. Major apologies to everyone that was waiting to see what we could do. We appreciate your support and we will not let a mistake define who we are.

TK

110,220 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten