Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Qullamaggie on Relative Strength Difference in Bear Market vs. Correction “Mild pullbacks, mild corrections in an uptrend, say 5, 7, 8 percent. Usually the stocks with the most momentum that have been showing resilience are the ones that tend to do the best. But during deeper corrections and longer...

lonextrades's profile picture

Lone

21,931 subscribers

11,476 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Qullamaggie on the Importance of Leading Stocks “And like people post setups all the time on my stream. People post setups all the time, and this is the hard part — identifying a really good setup versus something that’s random and mediocre. Because that’s gonna also reflect on your results. If you trade the random setups, your results are gonna be random too. You want to find the outlier stocks. You want to see if it has relative strength. The best time to trade this breakout method is after a pullback in the markets. You want to see the stocks that held up the most — the ones that had big moves previously and held up the most. And if you master this setup, if you trade this setup coming out of a small correction, like say a 5-10 or 15% correction in the overall indices, that’s almost like free money for this type of setup. Because if you can identify the stocks that held up the most during the correction — that maybe went down initially but then stopped going down as the correction went on, and actually started building higher lows — that’s telling you something. If you have a stock that’s gone up a lot, and then it stops going down when the market goes down, you know the stock is trying to tell you something. And that’s what leading stocks do. Like every bull market, this is obviously the case. I’m gonna talk more about it later. You obviously need an up-trending or sideways market to trade this method. You have leading stocks — the stocks that go up the most and are the most liquid. And those are really the stocks you want to trade. They’re mostly mid and large caps, but even a small cap can be a leading stock. Those are really the stocks that don’t go down when the market goes down. It’s like you try to push a tennis ball underwater — it just pops back up. And those are the type of stocks you want to find when trading this method.”
2:20

Qullamaggie on the Importance of Leading Stocks “And like people post setups all the time on my stream. People post setups all the time, and this is the hard part — identifying a really good setup versus something that’s random and mediocre. Because that’s gonna also reflect on your results. If you trade the random setups, your results are gonna be random too. You want to find the outlier stocks. You want to see if it has relative strength. The best time to trade this breakout method is after a pullback in the markets. You want to see the stocks that held up the most — the ones that had big moves previously and held up the most. And if you master this setup, if you trade this setup coming out of a small correction, like say a 5-10 or 15% correction in the overall indices, that’s almost like free money for this type of setup. Because if you can identify the stocks that held up the most during the correction — that maybe went down initially but then stopped going down as the correction went on, and actually started building higher lows — that’s telling you something. If you have a stock that’s gone up a lot, and then it stops going down when the market goes down, you know the stock is trying to tell you something. And that’s what leading stocks do. Like every bull market, this is obviously the case. I’m gonna talk more about it later. You obviously need an up-trending or sideways market to trade this method. You have leading stocks — the stocks that go up the most and are the most liquid. And those are really the stocks you want to trade. They’re mostly mid and large caps, but even a small cap can be a leading stock. Those are really the stocks that don’t go down when the market goes down. It’s like you try to push a tennis ball underwater — it just pops back up. And those are the type of stocks you want to find when trading this method.”

Lone

14,473 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Great Times to See What Stocks Hold Up “This is a great time to find the strongest stocks — the ones that are not affected by the overall market. So if you have a market pullback and you have a bunch of stocks that are not going down, guess what they will do when the market stops going down. And even starts going higher. Those stocks will fly.”
0:23

Qullamaggie on Great Times to See What Stocks Hold Up “This is a great time to find the strongest stocks — the ones that are not affected by the overall market. So if you have a market pullback and you have a bunch of stocks that are not going down, guess what they will do when the market stops going down. And even starts going higher. Those stocks will fly.”

Lone

10,563 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Qullamaggie on Ignore Weak Stocks “ROKU? Look guys, these kind of stocks - it’s a weak stock. Ignore these, ignore these. Focus on the strong ones. There’s a lot of random stocks. Ignore all of these. Focus on the ones that are in uptrends and that have been holding up really well during the correction. Focus on those ones. That’s where the big money is. Like ROKU is literally inside of a range right now. This thing has no upside. Look at stuff like DDOG. Look at stuff which I passed on. Look at stuff like WORK, which I am long. These are the types of stocks you wanna own. These are the types of stocks you wanna own. Look at this. TDOC also, this one I didn’t think it was gonna go. I saw it breaking out early, but I passed on it. But it’s just - they can’t hold it down. And as soon as the market selling eased, this thing exploded. All of these. Don’t, don’t look at these weak stocks. Ignore them.”
1:08

Qullamaggie on Ignore Weak Stocks “ROKU? Look guys, these kind of stocks - it’s a weak stock. Ignore these, ignore these. Focus on the strong ones. There’s a lot of random stocks. Ignore all of these. Focus on the ones that are in uptrends and that have been holding up really well during the correction. Focus on those ones. That’s where the big money is. Like ROKU is literally inside of a range right now. This thing has no upside. Look at stuff like DDOG. Look at stuff which I passed on. Look at stuff like WORK, which I am long. These are the types of stocks you wanna own. These are the types of stocks you wanna own. Look at this. TDOC also, this one I didn’t think it was gonna go. I saw it breaking out early, but I passed on it. But it’s just - they can’t hold it down. And as soon as the market selling eased, this thing exploded. All of these. Don’t, don’t look at these weak stocks. Ignore them.”

Lone

12,521 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Qullamaggie on Nicolas Darvas and Going Full Margin on One Stock “Nicolas Darvas used to get 200% in a stock; his record is pretty good? Yeah, but for every Darvas, there’s like 1,000 people who bought the wrong stock and blew up. Your number one job as a trader is to not blow up, okay? And by you do that by risk management. I don’t like the people who, you know, that glorify going on margin in a single stock or in a few stocks. It’s just stupid; you will blow up guaranteed. You’re on 200% margin in a stock. You know it goes down 30% overnight, you have lost most of your money. It’s just not worth it. Like in a bull market. There are so many stocks that go up, okay? There’s no reason to be in margin in one or a few stocks. Just look at the moves from the March lows. There’s hundreds of stocks that have doubled tripled quadrupled. There was no reason to be in one single stock. It’s just ridiculous; it’s the dumbest thing ever. Why would you be in a few stocks? I just don’t get the point.”
1:05

Qullamaggie on Nicolas Darvas and Going Full Margin on One Stock “Nicolas Darvas used to get 200% in a stock; his record is pretty good? Yeah, but for every Darvas, there’s like 1,000 people who bought the wrong stock and blew up. Your number one job as a trader is to not blow up, okay? And by you do that by risk management. I don’t like the people who, you know, that glorify going on margin in a single stock or in a few stocks. It’s just stupid; you will blow up guaranteed. You’re on 200% margin in a stock. You know it goes down 30% overnight, you have lost most of your money. It’s just not worth it. Like in a bull market. There are so many stocks that go up, okay? There’s no reason to be in margin in one or a few stocks. Just look at the moves from the March lows. There’s hundreds of stocks that have doubled tripled quadrupled. There was no reason to be in one single stock. It’s just ridiculous; it’s the dumbest thing ever. Why would you be in a few stocks? I just don’t get the point.”

Lone

20,925 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Howard Marks just gave a warning about the current stock market environment, boldly claiming we are in a stock market bubble Here's what he said: "It does seem that stocks are expensive relative to what I call fundamentals or you might call reality. The outstanding reason is that there hasn't been a serious market correction in 16 years. So people get out of the habit of thinking about market corrections. The biggest single mistake I've been thinking a lot - what is the biggest single mistake investors make? And I've concluded that it is that they conclude that the way things are today is the way it will always be. And the things that have been happening will always continue to happen. Whereas reversion to the mean is much more likely. So I just think that it's worked very well. Being an equity investor has worked very well. Doing it on leverage has worked even better. Concentrating in a few stocks has gone very well. Investors are by nature optimistic, and that optimism dies hard. And I just think that the fluctuations of the market are mostly related to psychological fluctuations, and people go from neutrality to liking stocks to liking them a lot to liking them a ton to liking them too much. And that's the continuation that creates bubbles. And you know where we probably in the early days of that when you talk about liking these assets a little bit too much."
3:10

Howard Marks just gave a warning about the current stock market environment, boldly claiming we are in a stock market bubble Here's what he said: "It does seem that stocks are expensive relative to what I call fundamentals or you might call reality. The outstanding reason is that there hasn't been a serious market correction in 16 years. So people get out of the habit of thinking about market corrections. The biggest single mistake I've been thinking a lot - what is the biggest single mistake investors make? And I've concluded that it is that they conclude that the way things are today is the way it will always be. And the things that have been happening will always continue to happen. Whereas reversion to the mean is much more likely. So I just think that it's worked very well. Being an equity investor has worked very well. Doing it on leverage has worked even better. Concentrating in a few stocks has gone very well. Investors are by nature optimistic, and that optimism dies hard. And I just think that the fluctuations of the market are mostly related to psychological fluctuations, and people go from neutrality to liking stocks to liking them a lot to liking them a ton to liking them too much. And that's the continuation that creates bubbles. And you know where we probably in the early days of that when you talk about liking these assets a little bit too much."

Triple Net Investor

43,952 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Qullamaggie on To Make a Lot of Money, You Need to be in the Best Stocks “LVGO and FSLY are the two best stocks right now. I’m long those; this is why you focus on momentum leaders. You’re not going to get any big moves in this. Random stocks like ZNGA—someone mentioned it yesterday— and this GLUE and stuff like that. These are some random stocks that are just having breakouts. You need to focus on the momentum leaders that you really need to be in. If you want to make a lot of money, you need to be in the best stocks. You can’t trade these random pieces of sh*t stocks that you guys trade, or a lot of you, I know.”
0:34

Qullamaggie on To Make a Lot of Money, You Need to be in the Best Stocks “LVGO and FSLY are the two best stocks right now. I’m long those; this is why you focus on momentum leaders. You’re not going to get any big moves in this. Random stocks like ZNGA—someone mentioned it yesterday— and this GLUE and stuff like that. These are some random stocks that are just having breakouts. You need to focus on the momentum leaders that you really need to be in. If you want to make a lot of money, you need to be in the best stocks. You can’t trade these random pieces of sh*t stocks that you guys trade, or a lot of you, I know.”

Lone

15,828 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Situational Awareness “I guess it was an okay setup, but it failed in a big way. That was near the peak of the SPAC market. You can see why it failed, because NASDAQ pulled back. Nasdaq had a big run, multi-month run. You wanna buy breakouts when the market comes out of a multi-month sideways consolidation or a multi-month sell-off. Here, good time to buy breakouts. Here, not so much. And that's why it's failed. The setup itself was okay, but once the market is straight up for multiple months, you gotta be careful buying breakouts. The setups themselves were okay. But the market started pulling back mid-February and everything failed. When is the best time to buy breakouts? Chat, come on. Come on, chat. When is the best time to buy breakouts? What do we want to see in the moving averages? After correction? Yeah, but the moving averages. When the 10-day is above the 20-day, yeah, more. Rising 10-day, 20-day. We want to see the 10-day above the 20-day, and both the 10-day and 20-day need to be rising. Or one of them can be sideways, but at least one of them needs to be rising. That's when you have good conditions, generally, for breakouts. In late February, the 10-day had started sloping down, the 20-day was sideways. So that was a warning sign. That you shouldn't buy breakouts. NIO, big move, pulled back to the 10-day, started building a flag and it went straight up. Why did it go straight up? Well, because the market had just come out of a multi-month correction. And that was the start of a multi-month move. And NIO had shown strength all the way. That's a good time to buy breakouts, when the market comes out of a multi-month sideways or multi-month correction. Not when the market has already run for two, three months straight up, and it's starting to lose momentum. Not a good time to buy breakouts.”
3:40

Qullamaggie on Situational Awareness “I guess it was an okay setup, but it failed in a big way. That was near the peak of the SPAC market. You can see why it failed, because NASDAQ pulled back. Nasdaq had a big run, multi-month run. You wanna buy breakouts when the market comes out of a multi-month sideways consolidation or a multi-month sell-off. Here, good time to buy breakouts. Here, not so much. And that's why it's failed. The setup itself was okay, but once the market is straight up for multiple months, you gotta be careful buying breakouts. The setups themselves were okay. But the market started pulling back mid-February and everything failed. When is the best time to buy breakouts? Chat, come on. Come on, chat. When is the best time to buy breakouts? What do we want to see in the moving averages? After correction? Yeah, but the moving averages. When the 10-day is above the 20-day, yeah, more. Rising 10-day, 20-day. We want to see the 10-day above the 20-day, and both the 10-day and 20-day need to be rising. Or one of them can be sideways, but at least one of them needs to be rising. That's when you have good conditions, generally, for breakouts. In late February, the 10-day had started sloping down, the 20-day was sideways. So that was a warning sign. That you shouldn't buy breakouts. NIO, big move, pulled back to the 10-day, started building a flag and it went straight up. Why did it go straight up? Well, because the market had just come out of a multi-month correction. And that was the start of a multi-month move. And NIO had shown strength all the way. That's a good time to buy breakouts, when the market comes out of a multi-month sideways or multi-month correction. Not when the market has already run for two, three months straight up, and it's starting to lose momentum. Not a good time to buy breakouts.”

Lone

11,870 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When the market gets boring and quiet and everyone turns bearish, I like to come back to the story of how I fucked it all up. And I fucked it up a lot of ways, because crypto is genuinely hard. People think the cycles just repeat. They don't. Every one has a different texture, a different context, and it is so easy to get it wrong. I got in back in 2013. Wrote the first ever macro piece on Bitcoin, and bought at $200, straight into a peak right before it slammed down and I felt like an idiot. But I had a thesis. And the mistake was never the thesis. It was letting the noise talk me out of it... selling, trading around it, being clever, when the only thing that ever worked was holding. That is the whole lesson, and it is the one that matters most at times like this. Crypto is one of the only real secular trends that lets you build wealth against the debasement of your salary. And as the Exponential Age accelerates, it matters more, not less. So when the market gets depressing, I do the same thing every time. I go back to the thesis, and I accumulate. Zoom out.
1:13

When the market gets boring and quiet and everyone turns bearish, I like to come back to the story of how I fucked it all up. And I fucked it up a lot of ways, because crypto is genuinely hard. People think the cycles just repeat. They don't. Every one has a different texture, a different context, and it is so easy to get it wrong. I got in back in 2013. Wrote the first ever macro piece on Bitcoin, and bought at $200, straight into a peak right before it slammed down and I felt like an idiot. But I had a thesis. And the mistake was never the thesis. It was letting the noise talk me out of it... selling, trading around it, being clever, when the only thing that ever worked was holding. That is the whole lesson, and it is the one that matters most at times like this. Crypto is one of the only real secular trends that lets you build wealth against the debasement of your salary. And as the Exponential Age accelerates, it matters more, not less. So when the market gets depressing, I do the same thing every time. I go back to the thesis, and I accumulate. Zoom out.

Raoul Pal

187,103 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Watching the stock market correct less than 10% and Bitcoin return to February levels, as MAGA trolls scream that the economy is collapsing is about as hilarious as it gets. The Dow is down about 7% from its peak. There have been approximately 10 corrections of at least 10% in the past 20 years alone. Corrections are a natural part of the market's cycle and typically involve a decline of at least 10% from recent highs. These pullbacks, while often concerning in the short term, are usually followed by periods of recovery and growth. Stocks under Trump were at one point down 33%. Stop wishing for WWIII and economic collapse as you all call yourself patriots.
0:45

Watching the stock market correct less than 10% and Bitcoin return to February levels, as MAGA trolls scream that the economy is collapsing is about as hilarious as it gets. The Dow is down about 7% from its peak. There have been approximately 10 corrections of at least 10% in the past 20 years alone. Corrections are a natural part of the market's cycle and typically involve a decline of at least 10% from recent highs. These pullbacks, while often concerning in the short term, are usually followed by periods of recovery and growth. Stocks under Trump were at one point down 33%. Stop wishing for WWIII and economic collapse as you all call yourself patriots.

Brian Krassenstein

486,871 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

German MEP Christine Anderson argues that governments "overplayed their cards" during the Covid era, setting in motion a mass awakening that can no longer be reversed. "The people stood up... And then they overplayed their cards. They came down even harder on the people to get them to do what they wanted them to do, and that woke more people up." "That was like a vicious cycle. The more people rebelled... the harder the state bashed down on them, the more people woke up." "And that's the situation we're in now. The genie is out of the bottle and they will not ever get it back in." "There is light at the end of the tunnel because a lot of people have woken up, and a lot of people will continue to wake up... in the months and years to come." "But I can tell you, buckle up. They're stepping up their game, so we have to do the same thing."
2:16

German MEP Christine Anderson argues that governments "overplayed their cards" during the Covid era, setting in motion a mass awakening that can no longer be reversed. "The people stood up... And then they overplayed their cards. They came down even harder on the people to get them to do what they wanted them to do, and that woke more people up." "That was like a vicious cycle. The more people rebelled... the harder the state bashed down on them, the more people woke up." "And that's the situation we're in now. The genie is out of the bottle and they will not ever get it back in." "There is light at the end of the tunnel because a lot of people have woken up, and a lot of people will continue to wake up... in the months and years to come." "But I can tell you, buckle up. They're stepping up their game, so we have to do the same thing."

Wide Awake Media

28,656 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Qullamaggie’s 100 Year Market Study Takeaways: "So out of the 102 years, there were 56 down quarters excluding sideways and excluding bars that went up - so 14 percent of the time market went lower over the past 102 years. That means the market has gone up or sideways 86% percent of the time, and I did a more recent study of Nasdaq from the 1970s and marked periods good for swing trading and periods tough for swing trading. It’s not an exact science but my conclusion was 62 percent of the time Nasdaq has been in a favorable condition, 62 percent means up and 38 percent of the time it's been going down or sideways over the past 40 years. The average bull run lasted 9.4 months and the average unfavorable period lasted for 7.2 months and we are like six months in a very good period and the median good period lasts for only seven months. So if someone tells you the market only goes up or if someone on Twitter tells you market only stocks only go up it’s not really true stocks go up and down.”
2:07

Qullamaggie’s 100 Year Market Study Takeaways: "So out of the 102 years, there were 56 down quarters excluding sideways and excluding bars that went up - so 14 percent of the time market went lower over the past 102 years. That means the market has gone up or sideways 86% percent of the time, and I did a more recent study of Nasdaq from the 1970s and marked periods good for swing trading and periods tough for swing trading. It’s not an exact science but my conclusion was 62 percent of the time Nasdaq has been in a favorable condition, 62 percent means up and 38 percent of the time it's been going down or sideways over the past 40 years. The average bull run lasted 9.4 months and the average unfavorable period lasted for 7.2 months and we are like six months in a very good period and the median good period lasts for only seven months. So if someone tells you the market only goes up or if someone on Twitter tells you market only stocks only go up it’s not really true stocks go up and down.”

Lone

24,250 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."
2:15

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."

Founder Mode

39,005 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”
1:46

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”

The All-In Podcast

189,084 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Ideal Base Length for Momentum Stocks “Yeah, TSLA. I would love for this thing to go sideways again. Like, the longer the base, the longer the move — to a certain extent. But the best bases are usually like two, three weeks to maybe three or four months. You know, like on momentum stocks — excluding the smallest micro-cap names. But if you look at mid- and large-cap, the best spaces are usually — I would say — like a month to four or five months generally. And if they’re gonna have any chance of breaking out of a longer base than that — like a really long base — they’d usually need some kind of episodic pivot. Like some kind of a catalyst or news that launches them.”
0:42

Qullamaggie on Ideal Base Length for Momentum Stocks “Yeah, TSLA. I would love for this thing to go sideways again. Like, the longer the base, the longer the move — to a certain extent. But the best bases are usually like two, three weeks to maybe three or four months. You know, like on momentum stocks — excluding the smallest micro-cap names. But if you look at mid- and large-cap, the best spaces are usually — I would say — like a month to four or five months generally. And if they’re gonna have any chance of breaking out of a longer base than that — like a really long base — they’d usually need some kind of episodic pivot. Like some kind of a catalyst or news that launches them.”

Lone

13,106 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Big Revenue Growth Equals Big Moves “Well look, the longer time frame you have on your trades, the more you need to focus on fundamentals and not just momentum. And you want stocks, you know, if you’re gonna hold the stock for many months and even quarters. You know there needs to be a reason for the stock to go up rather than just random momentum. Like, shorter term swing trading, you can just use momentum. You don’t need any fundamentals. But you know, to catch a mover like this, you know something goes up several hundred percent in a short amount of time. You know you need fuel. The stock needs, uh, to have a reason to go up. And the fuel many times is earnings, big earnings and revenue growth, and obviously big volume. You know some of my biggest winners: Fastly, Livongo, those stocks. These stocks went up 200, 300% after my entry. And these had big, you know, they had a lot of fuel or rocket fuel. And it’s called earnings and revenue growth. Now Fastly doesn’t have any earnings, but it had, you know, pretty good revenue growth. Livongo has enormous revenue growth and even earnings growth. Like a lot of these stocks that have made big moves, like Fiverr again. Big revenue growth and now it’s getting earnings too. GSX too. This thing has very big earnings and revenue growth, even though a lot of, you know, people call it a fraud. But like, look at the numbers right. This is the reason the stock is up, or was up almost 1,000% uh, in less than a year. Is because of this, look at the revenue growth. These are the stocks that make big moves. So you know, I try to focus on stocks that have big earnings and revenue growth. Primarily revenue growth, they don’t need to have earnings, but earnings if they have earnings, that’s a good thing. W too, well W was a bit trickier, because it had a slow quarter here. But now like, look at the numbers: 300% Rev, EPS growth 84% revenue growth. These are the stocks that make big moves. Overstock, hundred and ten percent revenue growth last quarter, and the market sniffed it out. This is why the stock went up two thousand percent before the earnings report. And you, you know, that’s something. If you study the big movers over the past, you know, 10, 20 years, you’ll see that most of the big movers, not all of them, but most of them had big revenue and big earnings growth.”
2:47

Qullamaggie on Big Revenue Growth Equals Big Moves “Well look, the longer time frame you have on your trades, the more you need to focus on fundamentals and not just momentum. And you want stocks, you know, if you’re gonna hold the stock for many months and even quarters. You know there needs to be a reason for the stock to go up rather than just random momentum. Like, shorter term swing trading, you can just use momentum. You don’t need any fundamentals. But you know, to catch a mover like this, you know something goes up several hundred percent in a short amount of time. You know you need fuel. The stock needs, uh, to have a reason to go up. And the fuel many times is earnings, big earnings and revenue growth, and obviously big volume. You know some of my biggest winners: Fastly, Livongo, those stocks. These stocks went up 200, 300% after my entry. And these had big, you know, they had a lot of fuel or rocket fuel. And it’s called earnings and revenue growth. Now Fastly doesn’t have any earnings, but it had, you know, pretty good revenue growth. Livongo has enormous revenue growth and even earnings growth. Like a lot of these stocks that have made big moves, like Fiverr again. Big revenue growth and now it’s getting earnings too. GSX too. This thing has very big earnings and revenue growth, even though a lot of, you know, people call it a fraud. But like, look at the numbers right. This is the reason the stock is up, or was up almost 1,000% uh, in less than a year. Is because of this, look at the revenue growth. These are the stocks that make big moves. So you know, I try to focus on stocks that have big earnings and revenue growth. Primarily revenue growth, they don’t need to have earnings, but earnings if they have earnings, that’s a good thing. W too, well W was a bit trickier, because it had a slow quarter here. But now like, look at the numbers: 300% Rev, EPS growth 84% revenue growth. These are the stocks that make big moves. Overstock, hundred and ten percent revenue growth last quarter, and the market sniffed it out. This is why the stock went up two thousand percent before the earnings report. And you, you know, that’s something. If you study the big movers over the past, you know, 10, 20 years, you’ll see that most of the big movers, not all of them, but most of them had big revenue and big earnings growth.”

Lone

11,356 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Why do we have inflation? The Fed tries to force 2% inflation. It wasn’t always this way. “The natural tendency for prices is to go down. If you look at the CPI in 1900 and you look at it in 1800, it was down by 50%. So for a hundred years in America, prices went down. And during that time, we had the Industrial Revolution.” “We had the most rapid period of economic growth in the history of America, which was after the Civil War and into the early 1900s. All the time prices were coming down.” “Today, the Federal Reserve says that we need to have 2 % inflation. Prices have to go up 2 % a year. Why? I mean, why does the cost of living have to go up? Why can't it go down or at least remain the same? And what is the answer to that? What's the rationale for that?” “Well, they have a bunch of BS explanations and it's all to justify the fact that the government wants inflation. It's not that it's good for us. The government needs it.” “It's the way the government raises revenue and repudiates its debts.” Peter Schiff
3:36

Why do we have inflation? The Fed tries to force 2% inflation. It wasn’t always this way. “The natural tendency for prices is to go down. If you look at the CPI in 1900 and you look at it in 1800, it was down by 50%. So for a hundred years in America, prices went down. And during that time, we had the Industrial Revolution.” “We had the most rapid period of economic growth in the history of America, which was after the Civil War and into the early 1900s. All the time prices were coming down.” “Today, the Federal Reserve says that we need to have 2 % inflation. Prices have to go up 2 % a year. Why? I mean, why does the cost of living have to go up? Why can't it go down or at least remain the same? And what is the answer to that? What's the rationale for that?” “Well, they have a bunch of BS explanations and it's all to justify the fact that the government wants inflation. It's not that it's good for us. The government needs it.” “It's the way the government raises revenue and repudiates its debts.” Peter Schiff

Wall Street Mav

98,990 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

𝗤 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀. It's just these simple patterns. I talk about it all the time. These channels, like you have a big momentum stock, goes up a lot, builds a channel. You have a big momentum stock, it builds a channel this way. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe does something like this with higher lows. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe goes up a lot and then maybe does something like this. These triangles and channels. High-tight flags. It's the same patterns over and over again. It doesn't matter if you learn them from Minervini, Dan Zanger, it's the same things, or Stockbee, right? It's the same things over and over. It's just so easy. You just need to train your brain to see these patterns on the strongest stocks. That's the key. The strongest stocks, not some random piece of shit. People keep posting these random stocks that have these bull flags, but you need the strongest stocks. You don't have an edge trading some random shit stock that happens to have a good chart pattern. I get these every day, people are posting and asking me about them. It has to be a momentum leader. Just the same patterns over... just look at the stocks I'm in, right? NVDA, I bought it last week, okay? Very simple. A big momentum stock, look at the pattern. What is it? Do you see this? Do you see this pattern? I bought it here. NIO, I bought it a couple of days ago. What's the pattern, right? Do you see it? I bought it on this day here, like somewhere here, right? LVGO, what's the pattern? Okay, I bought it here, so it was a little bit of a chase. FSLY, I bought it here. What's the pattern? You see this? DDOG, where did I buy it? I bought it here. This wasn't a clean one, but it was showing relative strength. But again, same patterns. You see higher lows and Z, I bought it here. I also bought it here initially. The same patterns over and over again. There's absolutely no rocket science involved. Anyone who's trying to sell you rocket science, just unfollow them and run the other way. They're all frauds. They don't make any money. Same thing, these simple patterns: triangles, channels, high-tight flags. We bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I also bought TSLA down here. Same thing. This is just the same patterns over and over again. All you have to do to succeed in the stock market is don't be a fucking retard. Really. I mean, really. That's all you have to do. You don't need any intelligence to make tens of millions. All you need to know is risk management, portfolio management, and these patterns. And then you need to have sit-out power when the market is bad. That's all you need. You literally need five things. And yes, CRWD... where did I buy it? On this day here. You see the pattern. LAC, I bought it here. You see the pattern. I bought it here, or was it here? I don't remember. One of... the same thing over and over again. Exactly, the big... yeah, exactly. All the... Zanger, Jesse Livermore, Darvas, Ruppel, O'Neil... exactly, it's the same thing. They're all momentum traders. They trade these momentum stocks, relative strength stocks, the stocks that funds are dying to get in, okay? You want the stocks that the funds want to buy, okay? The funds leave footprints, the big institutions, they leave footprints. Your job is to sniff out the stocks the funds are buying. You don't want some piece-of-shit random stock. You're never going to make money over time. You want buyers coming in after you.
3:30

𝗤 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀. It's just these simple patterns. I talk about it all the time. These channels, like you have a big momentum stock, goes up a lot, builds a channel. You have a big momentum stock, it builds a channel this way. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe does something like this with higher lows. You have a big momentum stock, it maybe goes up a lot and then maybe does something like this. These triangles and channels. High-tight flags. It's the same patterns over and over again. It doesn't matter if you learn them from Minervini, Dan Zanger, it's the same things, or Stockbee, right? It's the same things over and over. It's just so easy. You just need to train your brain to see these patterns on the strongest stocks. That's the key. The strongest stocks, not some random piece of shit. People keep posting these random stocks that have these bull flags, but you need the strongest stocks. You don't have an edge trading some random shit stock that happens to have a good chart pattern. I get these every day, people are posting and asking me about them. It has to be a momentum leader. Just the same patterns over... just look at the stocks I'm in, right? NVDA, I bought it last week, okay? Very simple. A big momentum stock, look at the pattern. What is it? Do you see this? Do you see this pattern? I bought it here. NIO, I bought it a couple of days ago. What's the pattern, right? Do you see it? I bought it on this day here, like somewhere here, right? LVGO, what's the pattern? Okay, I bought it here, so it was a little bit of a chase. FSLY, I bought it here. What's the pattern? You see this? DDOG, where did I buy it? I bought it here. This wasn't a clean one, but it was showing relative strength. But again, same patterns. You see higher lows and Z, I bought it here. I also bought it here initially. The same patterns over and over again. There's absolutely no rocket science involved. Anyone who's trying to sell you rocket science, just unfollow them and run the other way. They're all frauds. They don't make any money. Same thing, these simple patterns: triangles, channels, high-tight flags. We bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I bought TSLA here, right? Same thing. I also bought TSLA down here. Same thing. This is just the same patterns over and over again. All you have to do to succeed in the stock market is don't be a fucking retard. Really. I mean, really. That's all you have to do. You don't need any intelligence to make tens of millions. All you need to know is risk management, portfolio management, and these patterns. And then you need to have sit-out power when the market is bad. That's all you need. You literally need five things. And yes, CRWD... where did I buy it? On this day here. You see the pattern. LAC, I bought it here. You see the pattern. I bought it here, or was it here? I don't remember. One of... the same thing over and over again. Exactly, the big... yeah, exactly. All the... Zanger, Jesse Livermore, Darvas, Ruppel, O'Neil... exactly, it's the same thing. They're all momentum traders. They trade these momentum stocks, relative strength stocks, the stocks that funds are dying to get in, okay? You want the stocks that the funds want to buy, okay? The funds leave footprints, the big institutions, they leave footprints. Your job is to sniff out the stocks the funds are buying. You don't want some piece-of-shit random stock. You're never going to make money over time. You want buyers coming in after you.

Qullamaggie Wisdom

14,653 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

President Trump just gave an answer that will go down in the history books when Peter Doocy asked why assassination attempts keep happening to him. “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.” TRUMP: “Well, you know, I’ve studied assassinations and I must tell you, the most impactful people...” “The people that do the most...you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln...the people that have gone through this...the people to do the most...the people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after.” “They don’t go after the ones that don’t do much because they like it that way.” “And when you look at the people that have either...whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, and they’re very impactful people just take a look at the names there.” “And I hate to say I’m honored by that but I’ve done a lot.” “We’ve taken this country and we were a laughingstock years and now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world.” “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.”
1:22

President Trump just gave an answer that will go down in the history books when Peter Doocy asked why assassination attempts keep happening to him. “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.” TRUMP: “Well, you know, I’ve studied assassinations and I must tell you, the most impactful people...” “The people that do the most...you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln...the people that have gone through this...the people to do the most...the people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after.” “They don’t go after the ones that don’t do much because they like it that way.” “And when you look at the people that have either...whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, and they’re very impactful people just take a look at the names there.” “And I hate to say I’m honored by that but I’ve done a lot.” “We’ve taken this country and we were a laughingstock years and now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world.” “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.”

Overton

57,936 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Just dropped one of the most important videos I’ve made. 🚨 I walk through the potential correction setting up in $SPY and $QQQ and the mindset you need to navigate corrections and bear markets with discipline. If you trade or invest, watch this start to finish ⬇️
11:50

Just dropped one of the most important videos I’ve made. 🚨 I walk through the potential correction setting up in $SPY and $QQQ and the mindset you need to navigate corrections and bear markets with discipline. If you trade or invest, watch this start to finish ⬇️

Peter DiCarlo

97,941 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten