Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Racist human-hater fiend say bad words and got corrected (She'll keep saying them) ------------------------------------- 🎙️Voice Acting by: VA wants to be anonymous 📷Script/Editing/Art by: Googy #BlackedEdit #pmv #bnwo #snowbunny #qos #bbc #blacked #blackedhentai

130,373 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The World’s First Trillionaire Is Not Your Friend, And Other Notes It’s so pathetic watching Elon Musk’s groveling bootlickers fall all over themselves on social media to defend their favorite oligarch from criticism as he becomes the world’s first trillionaire. They’re like “Don’t be mean to the trillionaire, just become a trillionaire yourself! All you need is luck, connections, wealthy parents, the ruthlessness to step on anyone who gets in your way, and a willingness to cooperate with murderous imperial institutions like the Pentagon and the CIA!” Elon Musk is a military-industrial complex plutocrat who is balls deep in the US intelligence cartel and recently facilitated the US-Israeli regime change operation in Iran. You have infinitely more in common with the average person in Iran, Cuba, Lebanon or Palestine than you have with the world’s first trillionaire. It’s so gross how many fawning admirers this freak still has. The trillionaire is not your friend. ❖ People who say “Zionism is just the belief that Jews should have a homeland” are hilarious. Zionism isn’t some abstraction; we can all see its material manifestations with our own eyes. We can all see that Zionism means genocide, apartheid, and nonstop wars and abuse. This isn’t some kind of theoretical debate where we all get to have our own opinions about what Zionism is and what it entails. It’s 2026, not 1890. The facts are in and the case is closed, kids. This is what Zionism is. This is the only Zionism in existence. What you see is what you get. And what you see is quantifiably one of the most evil things happening on our planet. ❖ Some guy told me, “Why are you fine with the existence of approximately 50 Islamic nation-states, but the single Jewish one is apparently too many?” I showed him an illustration of a nail stuck in somebody’s foot and said, “Why are you fine with an entire foot made of flesh, but a single metal spike is too much? The only possible explanation is that you have a seething hatred of metal. It can’t possibly be that you object to a foreign object being violently forced into a region where it does damage.” He got upset and wound up telling me he hopes I get murdered by Mossad. ❖ Hasbara is so gross because it’s just Zionists throwing walls of language at you to convince you you’re not seeing what you’re seeing. You see raw video footage of the most horrifying thing imaginable in Gaza, and then you see them in the replies going “This is actually fine and normal because words words words words words words words.” You see a news report about Israel doing something astonishingly evil in Lebanon, and there they are underneath it going “There’s actually a lot more to the story because words words words words words words words.” You see some far right Israeli minister spouting nakedly genocidal rhetoric, and they’re swarming all over it saying “Well this isn’t actually what it looks like because words words words words words words words.” You see every major human rights group on earth saying Israel is guilty of genocide and apartheid, and they’re running around frantically telling you it’s a giant conspiracy to frame Israel and the truth is that words words words words words words words. You see more and more mainstream news institutions reporting on the mountains of evidence of widespread rape and torture in Israeli prisons, and they saturate the airwaves claiming it’s an antisemitic blood libel because words words words words words words words. The idea is to just pound your intellect with a firehose of verbiage until your inner sensemaker has been shredded and you’re too confused to form a coherent picture of what’s actually going on. It’s a disgusting, abusive, and profoundly unethical thing to do to people. But the good news is it’s not working anymore. Language is immensely powerful, but its power has its limits. Israel’s behavior has become so transparently unacceptable that no amount of word magic can manipulate people into seeing anything other than what’s happening in front of their face. ❖ Reading by Tim Foley.

Caitlin Johnstone

29,751 次观看 • 2 个月前

heres my take because I know these rumors are consuming a lot of JGs. Most of you know im a solo stan, but im also a huge JG shipper. I got into them for a reason. I was heartbroken by a ship in 2021 and never thought i'd ship anyone again, but here i am.i've followed Joss from lakorn time(on IG). He's PRIVATE, but he's always been HONEST. So why would I believe anonymous hater accounts over the people i've watched for years? These are the same accounts that previously swore G was dating K, J was dating C, and now suddenly its B. Every few months its a new story, with cropped photos, old videos, cropped dates ,connecting old photos with present ,stalking, creating fake timelines and alot of burner accounts. Im not asking anyone to be delusional. im just saying TRUST what you've actually seen. You can fake fanservice, but you can't fake a genuine connection . If these rumors were true, why did they only start appearing now that JG are getting bigger?They're artists, but dont forget they're real people too. They have families, friends, and lives outside of what we see. Not every interaction has to be about dating.i'll forever BELIEVE JG until they say otherwise!!If JG's connection ever turns out to be fake in the future (i.e. not going to happen) that'll be the end of BL for me .Until then, im not letting anonymous haters decide what I should believe.I trust JG their WORDS, what they've SHOWN US, and everything they've SHARED with US. More than ANYTHING, I TRUST what i've seen in "the name of LOVE💗" & i FULLY BELIEVE IN JG 😊 #JossGawin

ᴅᴇᴇ🧸ྀི ᵇᵃᵇʸ ᵇᵉᵃʳ ᵃᵈᵒʳᵉʳ♡

18,923 次观看 • 1 个月前

Hasan Piker said the fucking thing. On camera. With a microphone. On his own fucking broadcast. Then somebody called him out and he hit them with the sarcastic “I’m fucking racist, you got me.” Fine. It was a joke. Put a tiny clown fucking nose on it and call it satire. Now this fucking sentient hemorrhoid wants to threaten Scott Jennings with a defamation lawsuit because Scott talked about THE WORDS HASAN RECORDED HIMSELF SAYING. PLEASE. FUCKING. SUE. HIM. I haven’t wanted anything this badly since Diet Coke came in a fountain machine. Because apparently nobody has explained discovery to Che Guevara’s emotionally unstable Twitch moderator. Scott’s lawyers won’t need investigators. They’ll need fucking interns, caffeine and several industrial hard drives because Hasan has spent YEARS voluntarily creating the prosecution exhibit of his own personality. Imagine sitting for a deposition while a lawyer wheels in a television: “Mr. Piker, is this you?” Yes. “Is that your voice?” Yes. “Is that your channel?” Yes. “Did you broadcast this?” Yes. “And this?” Yes. “And these other 900 hours of you behaving like a fucking hostage situation with WiFi?” Objection. Overruled. Nobody hacked you. Nobody secretly recorded you. Nobody forged your voice. YOU PUT A FUCKING CAMERA IN FRONT OF YOUR OWN FACE AND DOCUMENTED THE ENTIRE CRIME SCENE OF YOUR PERSONALITY. And now you want Democrats to form a human shield around you because people keep noticing? Sue Scott Jennings. Fucking do it. Discovery would be less of a legal proceeding and more like opening the Ark of the Covenant if it were filled entirely with Twitch clips. Scott won’t have to destroy you. He’ll just press fucking play.

AmyButtermaker

40,177 次观看 • 17 天前

Marlon Brando once told Dick Cavett that everyone on Earth is an actor. Then he proved it, live on air, by dissecting Cavett himself. It remains one of the most disarming exchanges in talk show history. Cavett opened by pressing Brando on something he had read for years: that Brando considered acting "not a fit profession for a man." Brando deflected at first. "We can't believe the press; I don't know what we can believe in this country." But then, in his words, "in an effort to help your ratings," Brando laid out his real view of acting: "I think that we couldn't survive a second if we weren't able to act; acting is a survival mechanism, a social lubricant, and we act to save our lives every day." People lie constantly, he explained. By not saying what they think. By showing something they don't feel. By trying to give the appearance of feeling something they don't actually feel. Cavett pushed back: "But that's not acting." Brando disagreed: "That is acting. When you're nervous or frightened in this chair, or distressed and angry, you know that is not what is necessary to be shown here, so you control your face. You're a highly controlled person and you have to do that." Cavett argued there had to be gradations. He was motivated in the moment, but he couldn't wake up the next morning and repeat that same performance on command, take after take. Surely that skill, the thing Brando did better than almost anybody, was something different. Brando refused the compliment. He pointed to the office worker who hates his boss but performs enthusiasm for his "impossible notions" day after day to keep his job. Cavett countered that delivering the same line six times, getting "something deeper into it time after time," takes an actor. Everyday performances are one-time things with immediate motivation. "No, they're not one-time things because it's a daily procedure," Brando replied. "The dialogue changes but the motivation doesn't." Then came the moment the interview is remembered for. Brando turned the lens directly on his host: "Right now, you're thinking of 60 things at once: 'Is it getting dull? Is he upset? Is he bored? Is he offended? Here's a good time for a joke.' You're doing this editing at an insane rate with a demeanor of levity and zest, and that finally isn't what goes on in your mind or feelings at all." Cavett's response said everything: "I just feel like all my clothes have been taken off." Brando softened it. "I couldn't do what you do, and that's a different kind of acting; you're playing a different kind of role." Cavett tried one final test. He handed Brando a commercial script and challenged him to read it, any way he wanted. Brando refused flatly: "No, I won't do it." Cavett's closing line: "I'm glad you didn't. The man's incorruptible, and that's what I hoped." Source: The Dick Cavett Show, interview with Marlon Brando (1973)

History Nerd

1,121,591 次观看 • 1 个月前

⭕The End of the false Dilemma The Quran "The last preserved revelation" dominant over The Torah and Gospel 5:48. And We revealed to you the Book, with the truth, confirming the Book that preceded it and superseding it.. The False Claim "Fake Dilemma" : Christianity or "Constantinity" Claim that Quran confirmed the Bible, while The Bible is a collection of books written by around 40 different authors, composed over approximately 1,500 years, It's a man made history book mixed between the truth and falsehood, it's not the Torah or Gospel (Muslim's can easily show many of contradictions in bible) There is no book called the ‘Bible’ mentioned in the Quran, but The Quran confirms that some of the People of the Book know the truth but conceal its signs and verses, and this was proved to be true by many scripture scholers that converted to Islam like: Samaw’al ibn Yahya; A former Jewish rabbi who embraced Islam, And His famous book: “Silencing the Jews” The first Bible "Codex Sinaiticus" is a book that was compiled in Greek about five years after the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Christians theologians confirm that the Gospel should be in Aramaic, and the Bible contains Ugly Greek phrases, which indecat to a bad translation from Aramaic to Greek "I attached a video about it, soon I will make separate tread about Ugly Greek in the Bible, God's willing" The current bible was ‘pick-and-choose’ process. They rejected any writings that directly denied the divinity of Christ, such as the Arian writings and the Gospel of Thomas "essentially rejecting several early gospels" and most of these books and manuscripts were burned, by Constantine forces, that's why it's impossible to find a carbon dated manuscript from the first century. Question : Where is the true Gospel of Jesus that contains God’s direct revelation, where's the original scripture? A: This Question should be directed to Christians and Jews, not Muslims, and even if they found it, the Quran dominant over it Question : Where does it say in the Quran that the Gospel and Torah were corrupted? A: About the corruption and distortion of the scriptures, Here's the verses : Quran 2:75 Do you covet [the hope, O believers], that they would believe for you while a party of them used to hear the words of Allah and then distort the Torah after they had understood it while they were knowing? Quran 2:79 So woe to those who write the "scripture" with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah," in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn. Quran 2:159 Indeed, those who conceal what We sent down of clear proofs and guidance after We made it clear for the people in the Scripture - those are cursed by Allah and cursed by those who curse, Quran 2:174 Indeed, they who conceal what Allah has sent down of the Book and exchange it for a small price - those consume not into their bellies except the Fire. And Allah will not speak to them on the Day of Resurrection, nor will He purify them. And they will have a painful punishment. Quran 3:78 And indeed, there is among them a party who alter the Scripture with their tongues so you may think it is from the Scripture, but it is not from the Scripture. And they say, "This is from Allah," but it is not from Allah. And they speak untruth about Allah while they know. Quran 3:187 And [mention, O Muhammad], when Allah took a covenant from those who were given the Scripture, [saying], "You must make it clear to the people and not conceal it." But they threw it away behind their backs and exchanged it for a small price. And wretched is that which they purchased. Quran 4:46 Among the Jews are those who distort words from their [proper] usages and say, "We hear and disobey" and "Hear but be not heard" and "Ra'ina," twisting their tongues and defaming the religion. And if they had said [instead], "We hear and obey" and "Wait for us [to understand]," it would have been better for them and more suitable. But Allah has cursed them for their disbelief, so they believe not, except for a few. Quran 5:13 So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard. They distort words from their [proper] usages and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded. And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good. Quran 5:14 And from those who say, "We are Christians" We took their covenant; but they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded. So We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do. Quran 6:91 And they did not appraise Allah with true appraisal when they said, "Allah did not reveal to a human being anything." Say, "Who revealed the Scripture that Moses brought as light and guidance to the people? You [Jews] make it into pages, disclosing [some of] it and concealing much. And you were taught that which you knew not - neither you nor your fathers." Say, "Allah [revealed it]." Then leave them in their [empty] discourse, amusing themselves. Quran 7:162 But those who wronged among them changed [the words] to a statement other than that which had been said to them. So We sent upon them a punishment from the sky for the wrong that they were doing. Quran 16:118 And to those who are Jews We have prohibited that which We related to you before. And We did not wrong them [thereby], but they were wronging themselves. Quran 2:101 And when a messenger from Allah came to them confirming that which was with them, a party of those who had been given the Scripture threw the Scripture of Allah behind their backs as if they did not know [what it contained].

Clear Truth ⚖️

15,292 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk funded OpenAI to guarantee no one could own the most powerful technology ever built. He is now watching the people he funded own it. Musk: “I am the reason OpenAI exists.” He wrote the checks, roughly $50 million of them. He named it. He put open source and nonprofit into the founding charter as structure rather than branding, so no single group could consolidate control. Then they took the structure apart piece by piece and called it evolution. Nobody accidentally converts an open source nonprofit into a for-profit engine worth hundreds of billions. That takes years, lawyers and intent. And it answers the only question that has ever mattered about an institution, who it serves the moment real money shows up. For years the story held. Altman takes no equity. Pure mission. Selfless steward. Then Microsoft moved $10 billion, and the charter written to prevent capture became the instrument of it. Musk: “I don’t trust OpenAI. I don’t think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.” Carlson asked him directly whether Altman actually worries about AI hurting people, a question about what he believes rather than what he says. Musk: “He will say those words.” Saying the words and being bound by them are different tests, and only one survives contact with a valuation. Musk: “But no. When push comes to shove, let’s say they do create some digital superintelligence, almost godlike intelligence, well who’s in control?” Capability is the part everyone argues about. Control is the part nobody has answered. Whoever controls a superintelligence holds leverage no government, no army and no empire has ever had. Every generation before this one handed over its power by dying. This is the first one that gets to choose what inherits it, and that choice is being made by a few dozen people nobody voted for. The safeguard already failed once, at the lowest stakes this conflict will ever be fought over. A chatbot and a funding round. The next collision between safety and money arrives with a system running past human oversight, and no second attempt at alignment. A firewall that burns the first time capital knocks burns faster the second. Musk built the safeguard. They dismantled it, got rich off the wreckage, and called it progress. Principles that bend for money were never principles. They were a price. OpenAI’s was ten billion.

Dustin

16,188 次观看 • 24 天前

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!

Hotep Jesus

34,741 次观看 • 3 个月前

Megyn Kelly exposes the mainstream media lies about Charlie Kirk “F*ck you for not doing your homework and just trying to paint him as some crazy racist — These people need to be defeated, not reasoned with” - New York Times was saying about Charlie was, oh, he was very controversial. He said things like Martin Luther King was a bad guy. Yes, he did say that. You know why? Because MLK's own biographer, a Pulitzer Prize winning biographer, broke the story that MLK was in back rooms allowing women on his staff to get sexually molested by others right in front of him and seemed to kind of enjoy it. That's what Charlie was talking about. The stories no one else would talk about. - That Charlie had questions about the Civil Rights Act of 1964. You know why? Because Charlie actually studied people like Shelby Steele, who wrote all about how the black middle class was rising prior to the reign of Lyndon B. Johnson, who infantilized the black community, setting them back by generations with his great society programs. Do some homework. - This is a mainstream school of thought within the intellectual African-American community. Never mind. That's where Charlie got it. F*ck you for not doing your homework and just trying to paint him as some crazy racist. It was just ridiculous. That's the New York Times's take, okay. So I have been avoiding taking all this on because I just like, you're not going to convince these people. And why should we bother? Who gives a sh*t? We've already moved on without them. You can't persuade them. You can't persuade these lunatics who are online celebrating that Charlie's dead — You can't, all right, just stop. It's like these people need to be defeated, not reasoned with. All we can worry about is motivating our side. It's like Don Jr said, we had somebody who reached out to the other side and would listen to them and debate on fair terms. And to quote Don exactly, they f*cking killed him.

Wall Street Apes

354,910 次观看 • 11 个月前

the boyz concert ending ment | day 3 ((flustered hyunjae because younghoon’s ment basically said everything he wanted to say 😅)) 🐱 you’re always right after younghoon hyung 🎁 why am i always the one going after you..? let me see your letter (members laughing) 🎁 first of all, i want to start by saying thank you. earlier, it really felt like younghoon read my mind, he was thinking almost exactly the same things as me 🍞 🤷🏻 🎁 wow, he seriously said everything i wanted to say 🍞 that’s so mean 🎁 it’s not mean, i’m being serious! 🦝 i know, even if this hyung isn’t good with words, his heart is warm 🎁 i can’t just repeat everything like a parrot 🦝 his heart is warm 🎁 really… (silence) 🦝 just take your shirt off and end it 🍞 that would be the best 🦄 not bad, they’re asking you to do it 🦝 everyone, please calm down 🎁 can i say my ment too? honestly, i don’t need anything else, i just want to take this moment… like younghoon said earlier, to us who were once nothing, our deobis who gave us such great love, support, warm words, and kind expressions… i want to say that i’m most grateful to you 🎁 back when we were nothing… (getting choked up) ah, now that my brain’s working, the emotions hit right away. i really… you know, we’ve been doing this since we were young, and we’ve received so much help from so many staff members and employees around us. if it weren’t for them, we would never have been able to stand here… so i want to sincerely thank them as well 🎁 and lastly, to the members… for the past 10 years… of course, we have a leader, but… i’m sorry for being an immature older brother, for not being a cool or reliable one. i should’ve worked harder… i should’ve tried harder to push forward together with everyone 🎁 (laughs as he gets choked up) why does my voice sound like it has autotune? 🎁 yeah, those are the thoughts i’ve been having. today, you all worked so, so hard. eric, you really worked hard, i always joke around and nag you, but thank you for always doing your best. and to each and every one of you, i want to say you did an amazing job. i feel like i wouldn’t be able to say this if it weren’t for a moment like this, and you know i’m not really good at saying things like this… so i’m using this as an excuse to say it 🎁 deobis, thank you so sincerely for coming today. next time… when is it? we’ll see each other again on our debut anniversary, right? until then, let’s stay healthy, both physically and mentally. let’s keep talking and take care of each other. thank you #현재 #HYUNJAE #더보이즈 #THEBOYZ

For Hyunjae

10,491 次观看 • 4 个月前

On the back of the recently proposed (now paused) Karnataka bill mandating reservations for locals in the private sector, the ensuing criticism, and the criticism of the criticism, here comes a heartwarming new ad for WhatsApp made by BBDO India and directed by Shimit Amin. In fact, the film itself has a mild whiff of his film, Rocket Singh! Ikbir, the young Sardar chef, who comes to Bengaluru to join a hotel, is shown to be lost, initially, because he is unable to relate to the cultural milieu, but his mother's words inspire him to use food as a route to win over his colleagues. Food is a universal language by itself, and his effort to make a local cuisine (Bisi Bele Bath) helps bridge the first step. But he doesn't stop with food. He makes an effort to learn and speak Kannada too. So, while he may not be fluent in Kannada, or familiar with the local culture, he makes an earnest effort to explore, understand, and appreciate them (including celebrating Ugadi), instead of assuming that the local population needs to learn a language that he is comfortable with (Hindi, as a bridge) and that he can continue to ignore/overlook the local culture. In his line of work, the local culture manifests in the form of food, thankfully. The locals are not shown to be intolerant. They bond among themselves, but they also make an attempt to get Ikbir to feel welcome (asking the chat group to keep the conversation in English) once they understand that he is making an honest effort to adapt. The human story in this ad is truly wonderful. Where I felt it fell short is its link with WhatsApp. Except 'Verified Business' (the 'Spoken Kannada' business handle), the other features don't seem to be explored adequately. Shwetha's WhatsApp message comes with added context ('Block', 'Add', 'Not a contact. No common groups') but the story has no context to explore them. Ditto with the 2-step authentication or end-to-end encryption that are shown when Ikbir opens his voice messages or does a video-call with his mother. Most users take these for granted, so unless these are explored further, their presence in the script seem perfunctory. #advertising #marketing #creative

Karthik 🇮🇳

108,657 次观看 • 2 年前

As a student of Trump’s rhetoric, this is by far the most overtly racist, dehumanizing diatribe I’ve heard from him. This is a long way from “very fine people.” This is openly eliminationist, neo-Nazi hate speech against a group because of their race. Then the applause… “But I think that Walz is a grossly incompetent man. There's something wrong with him. There's something wrong with him. And when you look at what he's done with Somalia which is barely a country, you know, they have no anything. They just run around killing each other. There's no structure. And when I see somebody like Ilhan Omar who I don't know at all, but I always watch a few years have watched a complaint about our constitution. Now she's being treated badly, a constitution in the United States of America's a bad place. He hates everybody, hates Jewish people, hates everybody. And I think she's an incompetent person. She's a real terrible person. But when I watch one is happening in Minnesota, the land of a thousand lakes or however many lakes they have, and they got a lot of lakes. But there's beautiful place. And I see these people ripping it off. And now I'm understanding, and you're going to look at, that's a here they ripped off. Somadians ripped off that state for billions of dollars, billions, every year, billions of dollars, and they contribute nothing. The welfare is like 88%. They contribute nothing. I don't want them in our country, I'll be honest with you. Somebody said, oh, that's not politically correct. I don't care. I don't want them in our country. Their country is no good for a reason. Their country stinks, and we don't want them in our country. I can say that about other countries too. I can say that about other countries too. We don't want them to help. We got to, we have to rebuild our country. You know, our country is at a tipping point. We can go bad. We're at a tipping point. I don't know if people mind me saying that, but I'm saying it, we could go one way or the other. And we're going to go the wrong way. We keep taking in garbage into our country. Elon Omar is garbage. She's garbage. Her friends are garbage. These are people that work. These are people that say, let's go, come on, let's make this place great. These are people that do nothing but complain. They complain. And from where they came from, they got nothing. You know, they came from paradise. And they said, this isn't paradise. But when they come from hell and they complain and do nothing, but bitch, we don't want them in our country. Let them go back to where they came from and fix it. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.“

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

1,995,349 次观看 • 9 个月前

I got the true ending in Saros and here is my review: -Incredibly addictive gameplay, makes you think “just one more run,” you really don’t want to stop -Visuals are amazing, runs great on PS5 Pro -Awesome DualSense features -Art direction is something special, mix of HR Giger and Dune with overwhelming, striking imagery -Brilliant sound design and a soundtrack that constantly drives you forward -Great level design, exactly the right mix of exploration, combat, and platforming sections -Facial animations are a clear step forward -Fantastic voice acting -Rewarding upgrade system, every run actually makes you stronger -Unbelievable boss fights, not only visually impressive but extremely demanding, beating them feels like pure dopamine -Shield mechanic to deflect enemy projectiles is great -I wouldn’t say it’s easier than Returnal, but rather more accessible, with difficulty that can be adjusted up or down through modifiers -WTF story moments -Great accessibility features (colour blindness, controller remapping and more) -The game works great for short play sessions -Playtime of around 15–20 hours -Interesting narrative, but Returnal’s story had a stronger impact on me -Enemy and weapon variety could be better -Not a fan of 30 FPS cutscenes -Conversations could be much more dynamic, with characters often just standing completely still SAROS is a true PS5 gem, driven by incredibly well-crafted and highly addictive gameplay. Its visual style and sound design rank among the very best the industry has to offer. While it may not be perfect in every aspect, the overall experience is so compelling that it hardly matters. If you’re looking for a game that completely pulls you in and doesn’t let go until after the credits roll, this is exactly what you’re looking for. My verdict: 9/10 #SAROS Code provided by PlayStation

GermanStrands

26,183 次观看 • 3 个月前

Drama update for wowtwt: ever since being doxxed by Drohgoh a new challenger has appeared! I guess this is a TWITLONGER! 😂🤠🤡 Meet 𝕔𝕪𝕣𝕣𝕚 ♡ ...a mentally ill chronically online alcoholic 32 yr old grown woman (she pretends to be younger to get male attention) who wants to "ruin my life" because I yelled at her on stream while she was drunk saying stupid shit! Cyrri is a sociopathic fatherless attention seeking former "drug dealer" (so quirky loool) egirl who manipulates her ex boyfriend into paying her rent while shit talking him to eboys online. She claims to not be like the other girls! Lots of those around these days huh? Anyway, at first she was threatening me in twitch chat and then started slandering me to mutual friends and viewers lying about me anyway she could to try to get people on her side and farm sympathy by calling me a "creepy stalker pedo" (she copied drohgoh's slander) and then saying that i tried to "dox" her and threaten her. She then started "crying" while laughing on her stream saying that i was doing stuff to her, it was pornhub tier acting. She also threatened to release edited recordings of me to make me look bad...ok dont care bitch LOL. My wow guild was also getting doxxed and harassed (to fuck with me) and Cyrri was encouraging the doxxers because she knew it would get me gkicked since no guild wants to deal with that. She has no proof of anything because I never did anything so I dont give a fuck at all about her slander. The reason I'm making this post is because she crossed a line. A crazy line. Since Drohgoh leaked my information, a lot of malicious individuals have been threatening me and my family. My elderly mother has been harassed on the phone by Cyrri's associates. Cyrri is so mad that I hurt her ego on stream that she has gone to insane lengths to try to "ruin my life" including having her friends (simps) threaten to send my mother ILLEGAL PHOTOS (yes that kind) and say that I'm involved with that stuff. Maybe she'll try to SWAT me next? Who knows what this psychotic bitch will do! Cyrri and her internet terrorist associates want to fuck with me "until he kills himself or stops streaming" but I won't be doing either of those things. Fuck you Cyrri and fuck your simp ass cringe dark web internet terrorist simps. Stay mad you fatherless degenerate alcoholic🤣 DO NOT CARE LOL U WANNA THREATEN ME U WANNA FUCK WITH MY FAMLY? U WANNA SEND MY MOTHER ILLEGAL SHIT? U WANNA SEND THE SWAT TEAM TO MY HOUSE? SEND ME SOME DOORDASH TOO PLEASE! I WILL JUST SHIT TALK U AND UR CRAZY FRIENDS apple "apple" "luvapple" on discord (INTERNET TERRORIST SENDING ILLEGAL SHIT TO MY FAMILY) KEEP SIMPING FOR A BRAINDEAD EGIRL THAT WILL NEVER TOUCH YOU LIL BRO! KEEP PLAYING ROBLOX ALL DAY CHEATING IN CS HVH WHILE THREATENING TO FRAME PEOPLE FOR CP U FUCKING DEGENERATE CUCK! FBI I DONT GIVE A FUCK I AM GOING LIVE IN A BIT TO DEEP DIVE INTO THIS DRAMA MORE AHAHAHAHA IS THIS SCHIZO ENOUGH FOR YOU ALL? IS THIS WHAT THEY CALL A CRASH OUT? FUCK YOU here are some twitch chat logs and a short clip from the night of the drama after I yelled at her on stream, she doesnt care how she "paints" me... *trigger warning* slurs in clip 🤡

Gromnak

73,034 次观看 • 1 年前

The Met police chief proves he's as dishonest and racist as the force he leads: Once again, the BBC laps up outright disinformation from Sir Mark Rowley, police commissioner of the institutionally racist and corrupt Met. Watch the short clip below from the BBC News at Ten last night. 1. Rowley demands supporters of Palestine Action cancel or delay their protest today, after the Manchester synagogue attack, because the timing appears “antisemitic”. How to untangle this nonsense? a) The only possible way to interpret Rowley’s argument is that he believes every British Jew identifies and supports Israel’s mass slaughter of children in Gaza and therefore, out of respect for their grief at the Manchester attack, we ought not to protest against the slaughter in Gaza. That undoubtedly makes Rowley the antisemitic one. b) Even were his deeply antisemitic idea true – that British Jews are an unthinking herd of genocidal monsters – Rowley assumes that we ought to be okay with this: we should just keep quiet about Israel murdering 100 or so Palestinians every day in Gaza, and starving and ethnically cleansing the rest of the population, because it would supposedly offend Britain’s Jewish community to do otherwise. c) Rowley wants the protesters to take a time-out of a few weeks, even while Israel refuses to take any time-out on murdering Palestinians. Nor is the British government taking a time-out in arming Israel and providing it with intelligence to carry out the genocide. Rowley is suggesting we should simply quieten down for the next few weeks, even as 100 Palestinians are killed each day, before heading back to the streets. He thereby sends an unequivocal message that Palestinian life is worthless – and he does it while claiming we are the racist ones. 2. Rowley claims he wants this weekend’s protests stopped because of the danger they will raise “community tensions, which is my concern”. And yet from everything he says, the only community’s “tensions” he appears to care about are those of an imaginary one he has created of a Jewish hive mind. What about the tensions of Palestinian communities, of wider Muslim and Arab communities, of human communities, of those parts of the Jewish community opposed to Israel’s slaughter in Gaza, produced by watching children being torn to shreds by bombs Britain is helping to supply to Israel, by seeing world citizens – including British citizens – being abducted in international waters by Israel as they try to break Israel’s illegal starvation-siege of Gaza? Does Rowley care about these communities and their tensions, tensions that will only heighten if they are denied their long-established democratic rights to go out on to the streets to protest – rights that have already been aggressively whittled away by successive British governments? 3. Rowley says he finds it “bewildering” why more than 1,000 people would want to get arrested for “supporting a terrorist organisation” – and berates them for taking up police resources at a time when those resources are needed elsewhere. And yet, Rowley knows there is nothing “bewildering” about the protests. These thousands of British citizens, and millions behind them who are less courageous, are prepared to risk jail, and damage their careers and their futures, with a “terrorism” conviction. They are prepared to do so because they believe the proscription of Palestine Action – the first such proscription in British history for a direct-action group following in the tradition of the Suffragettes – is an assault on our fundamental right to protest, and to protest against the criminality of our own institutions, in this case institutions actively supporting a genocide in Gaza. If Rowley does not believe he has the resources to arrest the 1,000-plus people who will be sitting quietly in Parliament Square today holding placards opposing the genocide, then he can simply let them be. The sky will not fall in. No one will get hurt. There will be no threat to either public or national security. The true danger – the danger that Rowley and the government of Sir Keir Starmer really worry about – is that ever more people are beginning to understand that we are ruled by a gang of authoritarian, genocide-assisting criminals.

Jonathan Cook

41,903 次观看 • 11 个月前

Why is this easy for G. Edward Griffin to explain but hard for people to understand? "[The] people...running the show [have]... put... political actors on the stage to tell us what we want to hear... [and people will say Trump has] bad... advisors [but] he chose [them]." This clip of G. Edward Griffin (G. Edward Griffin), an author, speaker, researcher, President of Reality Zone, Faculty at Red Pill University, Host of Red Pill Expo, and Editor of Need To Know News, is taken from an interview with Brannon Howse (Brannon Howse) posted to the WorldviewTube (WorldviewTube) Rumble channel on August 12, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "But the bad guys, let's say the ones that are apparently running the show, could not have achieved the same thing under Harris, or Barack Obama or anybody else. They needed somebody who had the aura, of being Mr. Right, Mr. America, Mr. Conservative or Free market and so forth, because that's where the heart and the mind of the American public still is, even though it's being whittled away. They had to appeal to that. "And so, in my skeptical, view, Brannon, I think we have to take a deep breath and say maybe we've been fooled. Now we don't want to be fooled. You know, the old saying is it's harder to deceive somebody than it is to convince them that they've been deceived. And, I understand that because I've made some big mistakes myself, and I, you know, I stuck by them. I said this was not, I wasn't being tricked or anything. This. This guy is dependable. Well, it turns out he was a thief and stole a lot of money from us. And I was deceived, and I didn't want to admit it. "But let's go back to the main question here. We're talking about politics and not just money transactions. We're talking about big money transactions, actually, but more than money. We're talking about human control and power over nations and societies and everything. So, I have to go back and question the sincerity of our political leaders. "Now. I don't care. I'm not talking about Mr. Trump in particular or Mr. Any of them even. I know some of the best guys that we think we've had as presidents, like President Reagan, for example, has the aura, of being Mr. Conservative and so forth. But yet, look at what happened in the Reagan administration. We got, the free ticket for the, vaccines. We got some of the biggest spending that the government had ever done, even though the promise was that we're going to reduce the size of government. Government grew as usual. And, a lot of things were passed in the Reagan administration that were totally contrary to what the Reagan image was. "And of course, the, the press and the followers of Mr. Reagan, including myself, all rushed to the. To the conclusion that he must have had some bad advisors. Right? It's always, well, he's got, he's got. He's listening to wrong advice. If we could just give him the. I'm going to Send him a letter, I'm going to explain it to him, and then he'll see the light and, and all would change. My view is not that anymore. It used to be pretty much, I think that these people who are running the show actually deliberately put actors, let's call it what it really is, political actors on the stage to tell us what we want to hear. "And we will think, oh, this is going to be a change if we vote for this guy and put him in office. And then when this guy is in office, whoops, nothing changed, actually. And so we. Oh, he's got bad advice again from the advisors, by the way, which he chose. And most of them come from the Council on Foreign Relations, who, if you know anything about that group, you know, these people are dedicated to international government globalism based on the model of collectivism, which means a totalitarian system of government. "I don't care whether you call it communism, fascism, Nazism, socialism. I don't care that. Look at what it is. It's the same thing. And so I think what's going on is a great theater where we are given the illusion that we are choosing our own political destiny by voting one candidate or the other. And if you notice, there's an interesting trick there. People don't vote for anybody anymore. Most people don't vote for candidates. Anymore they vote against candidates. They say, I'm not so sure about either one of, them. I don't like either one of them, but I really hate the other guy. He scares me to death. So I'll vote for the lesser of two evils. "And that's how they niched us in step, little baby step by baby step, the lesser of two evils is still evil, and we're still buying into the collectivism that's been destroying the country, but in baby steps instead of big leaping bounds. And in that fashion we sit back and say, gosh, the guy is so good, I voted for him. I would never have voted. I would never have voted for a bad person. So since I voted for this person, he's a good man and he must have bad advisors. So now I think you got the gist of my opinion here. I think the whole political system today is corrupt and this."

Sense Receptor

64,144 次观看 • 1 年前

This broadcast of the Moriah & Berko talk show on Channel 13, from July 27, is a perfect example of the grotesque, genocidal gaslighting circus that is the Israeli media today. I broke it down for you. In the video, you can find some of the most outrageous sound bites, but I've decided to write a summary of absurdities from the entire first hour of the show, which dealt with issues concerning Gaza. ******************************* Moriah "no uninvolved" Asraf leads a discussion about the "fake starvation campaign", as the panel calls it, which has become a major "Hasbara problem". The panel's general consensus is that there is no famine in Gaza - but if there is, it's Hamas's fault. While denying that Israel is engaged in intentional starvation, the panelists appear to agree that the genocidal practice poses no ethical problem, only a public relations one. The one voice that hesitantly raises the issue of morality is being repeatedly shut down by the others. Co-host Eyal Berkovic, who has repeatedly said that Gaza should be wiped out, responds by saying that if it was up to him, he wouldn't let a drop of water into Gaza, and when Asraf says that "none of us likes to see starving children", Berkovic starts telling her repeatedly that he feels nothing towards the children in Gaza. Israeli-French journalist Emmanuelle Elbaz-Phelps is supposed to be the "leftist" of the panel, and was brought to the show to counter Berkovic. She's the only one on the panel who thinks that there's a moral problem with what Israel is doing in Gaza, and not just a "Hasbara problem". She tries to respond to Berkovic by saying that for the sake of "our children" Israel needs to prevent hunger in Gaza. Berkovic, talking to her in a blatantly disrespectful and dismissive manner, tells her that if she has mercy for the children in Gaza, she "already forgot October 7". Shay Golden, who earlier in the genocide made numerous deranged monologues ("We are coming to annihilate you") and even specified once that "we are ready to go into international isolation", now sings a different tune. He talks about how Israel's current situation on the international stage is an "existential threat", and complains that Israel is being unfairly shunned, framed for a famine it has nothing to do with. On the contrary, Golden claims, the amount of aid supplied to Gaza is "unprecedented in the entire history of human wars". Golden says that there's no question that "Israel is not starving Gazans intentionally", and that "only an idiot" would consider such a possibility. When Elbaz-Phelps tries to tell him that Berkovic literally just now said he wants to do just that, Golden hushes her. Interrupting Golden, Berkovic himself says he disagrees with him, and asks him whether he would support a hypothetical decision by Netanyahu, to prevent life essentials from entering the Strip, "until my hostages are returned". Elbaz-Phelps later tries to reflect to Berkovic the full meaning of his genocidal words, and asks him if he wouldn't react in case he was shown some foreign TV show with someone stating that "all Jews should be killed". In response, Berkovic suddenly plays dumb, asking, "Did I say something like this? I want the war to end." Asaf Cohen, a former deputy commander of Unit 8200, attempts to explain Israel's "Hasbara problem" and in the process says that "there's no starvation campaign in Gaza". Nevo Cohen, another panelist, is a former advisor to Itamar Ben Gvir and Naftali Bennett, who thinks Israel's been too soft on Gaza, and views the Strip as WWII Japan & Germany. Cohen cuts the other Cohen by loudly protesting - "What? What? What do you mean there's no starvation campaign in Gaza?" But all is well in the end - the two Cohens realize it was all a misunderstanding: Asaf Cohen was trying to say that there's no Israeli policy to starve Gaza, while Nevo Cohen thought he's denying a media campaign of staged starvation by Hamas. They both agree that, as the former Cohen puts it: "There is a marketing and publicity campaign claiming that we are starving Gaza." Asraf concludes that if Israel had decided on a policy of starvation, it would've been OK to deal with international pressure, and that the "biggest tragedy" is that Israel is being blamed for causing starvation despite putting, supposedly, large efforts in preventing a humanitarian disaster. ******************************* At a certain point, a clip is played, featuring a genocidal statement by Minister Amichay Eliyahu, said on the radio a few days earlier - "All of Gaza will be Jewish, it won't be fenced-up settlement... The government is racing to erase Gaza. Thank god, we're erasing this evil, and erasing the population that was raised on Mein Kampf". Similar genocidal statements had been made by members of the same panel - including during this very broadcast. Yet the caption on the screen reads "Amichay Eliyahu's horrible statement". Berkovic ridicules Minister Eliyahu's words, calling the minister "a joke" and saying that his plan to settle Gaza is unrealistic - it would be too expensive. ******************************* Avida Bachar then joins the panel. Bachar is a resident of the Gaza Envelope who was injured on October 7 and lost his wife and son. Since then he's often been invited to be interviewed by Israeli media, where he repeatedly spreads his insane genocidal fantasies, about Gaza (and the West Bank) being completely wiped out. So once again Bachar starts ranting, saying Israel needs to exterminate "every last one of them". When Asraf asks him: "Who do you want to exterminate?" he immediately responds "The Palestinians, all of them", but then stops and says "Wait... Hamas." This momentary realization doesn't prevent him from later saying that the "enemy" needs to "disappear" and that everyone in Gaza, including a baby born today ("In Rafah" - I guess he doesn't know Rafah has been completely erased) is an enemy. With complete lack of self-awareness, Asraf complains about the language Bachar uses - she says that words like "annihilation" and "erasure" are terms the enemy uses, and "we're not them". When Bachar is asked about the option of settlement in the Gaza Strip, he first raises opposition, and says that, "Daniella Weiss is not good.", but later it turns out that he's totally cool with settling the Gaza Strip, but only after every single Palestinian there has been expelled or murdered. No one in the panel speaks up against Bachar's murderous ravings, but Elbaz-Phelps comes closest - she can be heard gasping while Bachar describes how he proposes to "push" Gazans into Egypt, by bringing up his memories from the kibbutz cattle farm, where he used to poke the cows with an electric cable to make them move. Panelist Ilan Lotan, ex-Shin Bet, responds to that by saying "I know the Egyptians, it's not going to happen". As if the problem with this unhinged sadism is merely a practical one.

B.M.

229,079 次观看 • 1 年前