Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

📌 Rahul Gandhi’s “CASTE DISCRIMINATION” narrative gets hit with TWO reality check Fact-check #1: His stage propagates President Murmu was kept out of the Jagannath temple because she is Adivasi. > But the temple episode was linked to security/crowd considerations, not her tribal identity. Fact-check #2: They also cited...

22,872 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I was watching this Bloomberg video, notice how they subtly insert the fact that this woman was born into the “lowest caste” in “India’s social hierarchy,” even if it’s irrelevant to the story. Keep in mind, this is not accidental—it’s a calculated effort to reinforce the narrative that the “caste system” defines India. The goal is to shape American perceptions, convincing their white audience that Indians are inherently bigoted and perpetuate “caste oppression.” What they deliberately ignore is that India has gigantic welfare programs exclusively designed to benefit the same “lower caste” communities, funded largely by “upper-caste” taxpayers. (Over $35 Billion/year spent for SC/ST welfare) They also avoid addressing how Tamil Nadu, despite being considered one of the most socially progressive states, has some of the highest levels of caste-based discrimination, because most of it is lower caste on lower caste violence, and there is no way to drag "upper castes" into it and start caste-baiting. At the end of the day, the suffering of these women stems from poverty & economic hardship, not caste. It deflects from deeper issues like the failures of Nehruvian socialist policies, as well as, how communist activists have annihilated manufacturing and industries, which is the real driver of poverty. Instead of acknowledging the nuances or the economic roots of poverty, they simplify the issue into a black-and-white story of Oppressors Vs Victims, attempting to dehumanize Indians as a whole. The core objective of all this is to lay groundwork for justifying their future political interference when India tries to stand up to America. They have been demonizing China for decades; now it’s India’s turn. Recognize the propaganda, call it out, and spread the word.

@drishtadyumna

15,189 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BENIN CITY, EDO: Yesterday, Naija Confra reported on the case of the Maphite (GCAI) Vice President, Elvis, who many also referred to as Evans or Osagie, and who has been accused of k**ling his wife, Osas. Today, we obtained a video from ITV News showing the narrative of Osas’s family. This narrative aligns with our earlier report which was confirmed by Maphite members and some friends. Let it be clear that at no point in our report did we say that the Maphite Vice President k**led his wife (read our last report carefully). We used words such as “accused” and “properly charged if found guilty.” What we only confirmed was that he was a serious wife be@ter, which was consistently stated by everyone we spoke to. We also confirmed that he is a cultist and the Vice President (overall number 2 man) of the Maphite (GCAI) cult group, and that members of his group thre@tened the victim’s family. These are the details we confirmed and are not allegations. As stated in our previous report, the husband alleged that his wife woke up at night, screamed, and later suffered a heart att@ck that led to her de@th. He maintains that he did not k**l her. There are also reports that he is willing to allow an autopsy to be carried out on his late wife’s body. While the husband has been described as a wife be@ter who regularly ass@ulted his wife, it is also important to note that some sources claim he was rich, and financially supported her and took care of her needs. There are also claims that the marriage was toxic, with both parties having their faults. Naija Confra will provide further updates after the autopsy is conducted and investigations are concluded.

Naija Confra

18,656 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The relationship between the President of Malawi, Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika, and his kitchen cabinet on one hand, and his Vice President, Dr Jane Ansah, on the other, has deteriorated so badly that on 1 March, when President Mutharika left for a medical check-up in South Africa and was given a military parade in his honour before departure, the Vice President was not allowed to see him at the airport by state security. She was kept waiting in her car, a clear sign of a complete breakdown in trust and working relations at the very top of the Malawian government. This is not the first time that President Mutharika has fallen out with one of his vice presidents. In his first term, he fell out with his Vice President, Dr Saulos Chilima, leading to a complete breakdown in their working relationship, with Chilima eventually forming his own party, the United Transformation Movement, and openly challenging Mutharika for power. His elder brother, former president Bingu wa Mutharika, also fell out with his vice presidents, first Dr Cassim Chilumpha and later Dr Joyce Banda. During his first term, Bingu wa Mutharika fell out with Dr Cassim Chilumpha after accusing him of being involved in an alleged coup plot in 2006. Chilumpha was arrested and charged with treason, and although he remained constitutionally vice president, their working relationship completely collapsed. In his second term, Bingu wa Mutharika fell out with Dr Joyce Banda after she refused to support his succession plans, particularly his attempt to position his brother, Peter Mutharika, as his successor. Banda was expelled from the ruling Democratic Progressive Party but remained vice president because the constitution protected her position. By the time Bingu wa Mutharika died in 2012, the relationship had broken down so badly that senior officials attempted to block Joyce Banda from assuming the presidency, despite the constitution clearly mandating that the vice president takes over. Lazarus Chakwera also fell out with his Vice President, Dr Saulos Chilima, after coming into power under the Tonse Alliance in 2020. The relationship deteriorated as Chilima and his United Transformation Movement complained of marginalisation in government, with key decisions and appointments increasingly dominated by Chakwera’s Malawi Congress Party. Tensions escalated in 2022 when Chilima was arrested on corruption allegations, after which Chakwera stripped him of delegated powers, leading to a complete breakdown in trust and effectively collapsing the alliance, even though Chilima remained Vice President. There are now efforts by senior DPP members in Parliament to resolve the current impasse, as the deepening rift threatens both party cohesion and the stability of government.

Hopewell Chin’ono

43,116 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher — and equally falsely — claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.

Joel Mowbray

658,645 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Two years ago, on this very day, President Tshisekedi was declared the "elected President" of the DRC for a second term. During his campaign, he promised to open fire on Rwanda, claiming that he did not need foot soldiers and that from Goma he was capable of striking Kigali. Thirty days later, on 20 January 2024, he was sworn in. President Ndayishimiye was among the invited heads of state and received loud cheers when he arrived at the stadium, as the MC introduced him as a “friend” who helps fight their enemy. The following day, Ndayishimiye met with Congolese youth and pledged to help Rwandan youth remove President Kagame. Many people tend to focus only on Ndayishimiye’s response. But who asked the question? Yesterday, during the 17th RPF Congress, Chairman and President Kagame stated that in geopolitical conflicts, the first casualty is the truth. The person who asked the question to President Ndayishimiye is Mbitsemunda Habyarimana Jean Claude, who later changed his name to Jules Mulumba. He is the Secretary General and spokesperson of the CMC Nyatura armed group, a member of the Wazalendo coalition. CMC Nyatura, composed of young Congolese Hutu extremists, was initiated and created by former FDLR commander Lt. Gen. Sylvestre Mudacumura as an FDLR proxy—Congolese in appearance but sharing the same ideology. In summary, CMC Nyatura is the youth wing of the FDLR. Jules Mulumba is well known for his hate speech against Congolese Tutsi and those he labels as “Hima” in the region. In his question to President Ndayishimiye, he falsely claimed that Rwanda had killed four presidents: President Habyarimana, President Ntaryamira, Congolese President Laurent-Désiré Kabila, and Burundi’s President Melchior Ndadaye, who was assassinated in 1993. When such actors speak of “Rwanda,” they are in fact targeting President Kagame. In his response, President Ndayishimiye endorsed Mulumba’s narrative by failing to correct the false facts, lies, and manipulation. Instead, he declared that the “revolution” should continue and that Rwandan youth must be “liberated.” Two years later, in a video circulating on social media, President Ndayishimiye was heard during an end-of-year gathering with his officers playing the victimhood card, claiming that he was being targeted by a country from the north. Presidents Ndayishimiye and Tshisekedi have something in common: both readily declare war and issue threats they cannot sustain. When confronted with reality and defeat, they abandon belligerence and retreat into victimhood, portraying themselves as targets rather than accountable actors

Noel Kambanda

19,688 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten