Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Rangers: 121/Unit Analysis Example Same disclaimers, this isn't "having a go" or "singling out" players, just simply an example of the type of Performance Analysis I do with International Footballers. If I was reviewing the Midfield Unit at Rangers today and having 121/Unit meetings with the 4 CM's this...

37,209 просмотров • 15 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Rangers v Falkirk - Analysis Danny Röhl has said Positioning, Body-Shape Receiving & Decision-Making to go forward were going to be a key focus on the Analysis this morning and you can absolutely see why. Decision Making > Ball Moved on the Outside (Aarons to Bajrami, Bajrami to Aarons, Aarons to CB and round) > Passes into Aasgaard or Bajrami Ignored > Combinations to find players behind lines of Falkirks' Press > When we do get it forward we end up with 8 Falkirk Players back behind the ball Positioning of Aasgaard as the 10 (Just at Motherwell is unbelievable at judging these distances as a 10) > Aasgaard Deepening > Not close enough to attract CB's to jump > Close enough that CM's drop back onto him before he can play forward > Receiving behind the line & driving at defences is what looked like Thelo Aasgaards key skillset when we signed him Body-Shape Receiving > Raskin Closed-Off when we could go forward > Aasgaard receiving with wrong foot when Miovski clean-through Bojan Miovski Starting to get the "Disappointed" bracket off others: > Intelligent runs made continually > Completely starved of service > Resulting in deepening away from goal I still believe if we start improving decision-making through the analysis, training & confidence from 13/15pts then we can start to see something come together. Bad Players don't get to this level, it's mentality in dealing with the pressure that separates the good to elite...

John Walker

43,783 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Introducing the “Get” action in basketball to lacrosse! The “Get” is a 2man action where a player passes the ball to another player and sprints to go “Get” it back on a handoff. This action has similar concepts and reads to pick and roll, but the picker is actually the ball handler! In lacrosse, we have been experimenting with Gets because it creates so many interesting situations and reads for the players. The way we teach it in small sided games is to have one offensive player declare “I’m shut” and the defense has to face-guard him. From there we pick for the shut off player trying to spring them free for the Get. The ball handler has to engage and control their defender, anticipating the shut player trying to get open. The shut player can backdoor if being overplayed towards the get (rejecting the get), receive a flip, or continue curling around the ball getting open for a late pass. The ball handler can feed the reject, flip the ball, or fake the flip to attack the goal or make a late pass to the shut payer curling to the goal. I’ve seen examples of this run in men’s and women’s DI lacrosse at Ohio State and Northwestern, respectively and I’ve run this myself when I was coaching HS girls lacrosse. You will also see on this reel a sick application for Gets vs. a common big-little invert coverage where the short stick doesn’t go behind with his man and plays “Safety” in front of the net. Gets are fun for the players, are incredible for teaching your players 2man game on and off ball, dealing with double teams, and creativity with passing, and can be used to score goals. I hope you enjoy it! Can you think of other applications for Gets?

JM3 SPORTS

12,424 просмотров • 1 год назад

I've seen a lot of comments about this so I'll address it here. I will talk about it more in detail in tomorrows YT video. Context: Deciding 3rd game of a #NHL24WC qualifier playoff series. I enter the zone with 4 minutes to go in game which is a bit over minute in real time. I know Lauri Enström is playing protect net collapsing like he has the whole series. Like I always do in tournament games with this little time on the clock I start circling and killing time, seeing if Sopuli overcommits or something opens up, like I always do at the end of tournament games when I'm leading. Around a minute left in game I get full pressure on and at this stage I know the game is basically over cause Sopuli can't change his players to be more aggressive mid cycle and your players are dead during full pressure (and it lasts 30 seconds in real time). What makes this clip stand out is the 5-1 in front of his net with 30 or so seconds remaining 😅 But again why would I need to try to score here explaining everything I just did? I would just give Sopuli a free change to tie the game. With full pressure added I personally play with aggressive own zone strategies just to avoid stuff like this in 24, of course you can still try to rag the pressure on with how the AI is but it's way harder at least. I'm not saying it's nice or fun or whatever, and I totally get if people don't like it, but I would do the same thing every single time in an important tournament game.

Erik "Eki" Tammenpää

291,572 просмотров • 2 лет назад