Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Rantz: This idea that this is like the biggest priority is obviously not true Phillip: Why did he call that press conference today? What was the top issue? Because he wanted to show them a chart about the reflecting pool. Rantz: I'm not moved by the fact that the... show more

Acyn

753,877 subscribers

60,720 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Rantz: This idea that people do in fact have support for abolishing or defunding ICE is Just not true. There's no poll that suggests that. Phillip: There was a poll that showed that almost half of Americans are open to it. Rantz: Outlier

Rantz: This idea that people do in fact have support for abolishing or defunding ICE is Just not true. There's no poll that suggests that. Phillip: There was a poll that showed that almost half of Americans are open to it. Rantz: Outlier

Acyn

93,399 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Mockler: This directly contradicts almost everything the administration has said. Rantz: It doesn’t Mockler: It absolutely has. Donald Trump has declared total victory multiple times. Rantz: He said that we’re winning. Mockler: He said that we won this war. Every weapon system that was actually a threat to us is still intact. Rantz: That’s not true. Mockler: That is absolutely true. Why are the ballistic missiles still firing? Why is the strait of hormuz closed?

Mockler: This directly contradicts almost everything the administration has said. Rantz: It doesn’t Mockler: It absolutely has. Donald Trump has declared total victory multiple times. Rantz: He said that we’re winning. Mockler: He said that we won this war. Every weapon system that was actually a threat to us is still intact. Rantz: That’s not true. Mockler: That is absolutely true. Why are the ballistic missiles still firing? Why is the strait of hormuz closed?

Acyn

187,002 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Rantz: I don’t think regime change is his goal Rogin: That’s what he said. He said he wants to pick the next leader Rantz: He did not say that. You’re making that quote up.

Rantz: I don’t think regime change is his goal Rogin: That’s what he said. He said he wants to pick the next leader Rantz: He did not say that. You’re making that quote up.

Acyn

83,371 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Phillip: Trump was arguing that we shouldn't be spending money on regime change wars overseas Rantz: The context of that original statement was about wars that he did not believe were in our best interests. Mockler: Who defines our best interests? Rantz: The president. A president is able to say they believe it’s in our best interests. Mockler: That’s what Bush said.

Phillip: Trump was arguing that we shouldn't be spending money on regime change wars overseas Rantz: The context of that original statement was about wars that he did not believe were in our best interests. Mockler: Who defines our best interests? Rantz: The president. A president is able to say they believe it’s in our best interests. Mockler: That’s what Bush said.

Acyn

64,868 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Rantz: The argument that Trump doesn’t care about this— Figaro: He doesn’t Rantz: By putting all this stuff out there, he knows he’s going to be cleared….

Rantz: The argument that Trump doesn’t care about this— Figaro: He doesn’t Rantz: By putting all this stuff out there, he knows he’s going to be cleared….

Acyn

76,671 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Sellers: We're talking about selling bibles. We're talking about selling sneakers… Rantz: This is not new, though, right? I mean, the idea that he's selling things. Phillip: Are you suggesting that that's legitimate? Rantz: Selling shoes? Yeah, of course it's legitimate. He's selling a product. Hill: You're suggesting it's legitimate for him to be profiting off the presidency while he's the president. Rantz: He’s profiting off of his brand.

Acyn

116,491 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Rantz: We have 2% GDP growth. Phillip: You can’t gaslight about the history. A whole year of virtually zero private sector job growth, GDP growth that was below 1% and only went up to 2% is not a victory. Rantz: If the economy was struggling— Mockler: It is struggling.

Rantz: We have 2% GDP growth. Phillip: You can’t gaslight about the history. A whole year of virtually zero private sector job growth, GDP growth that was below 1% and only went up to 2% is not a victory. Rantz: If the economy was struggling— Mockler: It is struggling.

Acyn

215,078 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Rantz: This would be different if Donald Trump and his family didn't come to it with the business background that he already had. You're laughing? Phillip: They're not in the rare Earth mineral business. They're not in the drone business

Rantz: This would be different if Donald Trump and his family didn't come to it with the business background that he already had. You're laughing? Phillip: They're not in the rare Earth mineral business. They're not in the drone business

Acyn

71,452 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Rantz: I'm going to say that it had nothing to do with slavery. Blow: That's not true. For this man to sit here and say it has nothing to do with slavery. What did you learn in school? Rantz: I’m not arguing it doesn’t play a role. Blow: You just said that! Navarro: You were just schooled on TV. Rantz: I was not schooled. Navarro: You were absolutely schooled. Your ignorance was revealed.

Rantz: I'm going to say that it had nothing to do with slavery. Blow: That's not true. For this man to sit here and say it has nothing to do with slavery. What did you learn in school? Rantz: I’m not arguing it doesn’t play a role. Blow: You just said that! Navarro: You were just schooled on TV. Rantz: I was not schooled. Navarro: You were absolutely schooled. Your ignorance was revealed.

Acyn

337,482 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Mockler: No Democrat sent out a tweet asking to prosecute three specific people. Rantz: He believes they broke laws… I do think that the framing is important. Phillip: You're defending that? You're making that sound as if it's reasonable and it's not okay. The president making a unilateral determination in his own mind that somebody has broken the law without providing, by the way, any proof of that. And then directing an investigation into that person is. Calling for that is that is not that is not appropriate. Okay. I'm sorry if you don't if you don't like, you know, partisan prosecutions, you should also not like that.

Mockler: No Democrat sent out a tweet asking to prosecute three specific people. Rantz: He believes they broke laws… I do think that the framing is important. Phillip: You're defending that? You're making that sound as if it's reasonable and it's not okay. The president making a unilateral determination in his own mind that somebody has broken the law without providing, by the way, any proof of that. And then directing an investigation into that person is. Calling for that is that is not that is not appropriate. Okay. I'm sorry if you don't if you don't like, you know, partisan prosecutions, you should also not like that.

Acyn

146,613 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Phillip: Why can’t conservatives answer for that? Why was Obama able to deport so many people without creating anything like this? Rantz: Because there wasn't resistance Phillip: There absolutely was. It's because these types of raids were not happening.

Phillip: Why can’t conservatives answer for that? Why was Obama able to deport so many people without creating anything like this? Rantz: Because there wasn't resistance Phillip: There absolutely was. It's because these types of raids were not happening.

Acyn

418,196 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Phillip: This is a really terrible poll for the president. And it's not isolated. Quinnipiac poll had similar results. Rantz: I mean, you mentioned the Quinnipiac poll. It's also not great for Democrats. Phillip: They have a 48 to 41% advantage on control over the house in that poll.

Phillip: This is a really terrible poll for the president. And it's not isolated. Quinnipiac poll had similar results. Rantz: I mean, you mentioned the Quinnipiac poll. It's also not great for Democrats. Phillip: They have a 48 to 41% advantage on control over the house in that poll.

Acyn

47,868 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Phillip: Why is he saying that Georgia was a fraudulent state, that he actually won when he did not? Jennings: He says the things that he believes. Phillip: Is he right? Jennings: I don’t know Phillip: You don’t know? You used to know.

Phillip: Why is he saying that Georgia was a fraudulent state, that he actually won when he did not? Jennings: He says the things that he believes. Phillip: Is he right? Jennings: I don’t know Phillip: You don’t know? You used to know.

Acyn

469,888 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Lieu: Trump overpaid on a no-bid contract to a pool guy who was a total amateur and messed up the Reflecting Pool, and now Trump’s fragile ego has him trying to cover this up by saying someone did a 350-foot gash in the pool. This pool has 24/7 cameras on it. So we’re in a place where the president is just lying because he can’t handle that he totally screwed up the Reflecting Pool.

Lieu: Trump overpaid on a no-bid contract to a pool guy who was a total amateur and messed up the Reflecting Pool, and now Trump’s fragile ego has him trying to cover this up by saying someone did a 350-foot gash in the pool. This pool has 24/7 cameras on it. So we’re in a place where the president is just lying because he can’t handle that he totally screwed up the Reflecting Pool.

Acyn

666,597 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Phillip: They were armed. They burst into the house. Mr. Gibson's lawyers filed with the judge to say that they did not have a warrant. Jennings: Is he an illegal alien? Phillip: He had an arrangement with ice that allowed him to be in the country as long as he checked in. He had just checked in with them. They could have picked him up last week when he was in the office. They didn't do that. What they did was they broke down the door without a warrant, and they detained him. Jennings: The only reason this is happening, is because they can't get an arrangement with the locals to pick them up in the jails. Phillip: You keep saying that. It doesn’t make it true.

Phillip: They were armed. They burst into the house. Mr. Gibson's lawyers filed with the judge to say that they did not have a warrant. Jennings: Is he an illegal alien? Phillip: He had an arrangement with ice that allowed him to be in the country as long as he checked in. He had just checked in with them. They could have picked him up last week when he was in the office. They didn't do that. What they did was they broke down the door without a warrant, and they detained him. Jennings: The only reason this is happening, is because they can't get an arrangement with the locals to pick them up in the jails. Phillip: You keep saying that. It doesn’t make it true.

Acyn

463,538 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Conservative Jason Rantz confronts the CNN panel on why it took more than FOUR separate scandals before Democrats finally turned on Graham Platner. Watch Abby Phillip fold like a lawn chair on Platner — now acting as if she cared about the allegations all along. RANTZ: “Why was the Nazi tattoo not enough? Why was making fun of rape victims or making jokes about rape? Why was that okay?” “Why did you guys dismiss the New York Times story — simply because the victim in that case was a Republican?” “Those are legitimate questions that the Democrats decided did not need to be adequately answered...” [Abby Phillip suddenly turns serious and “gives voice” to the victims.]

Conservative Jason Rantz confronts the CNN panel on why it took more than FOUR separate scandals before Democrats finally turned on Graham Platner. Watch Abby Phillip fold like a lawn chair on Platner — now acting as if she cared about the allegations all along. RANTZ: “Why was the Nazi tattoo not enough? Why was making fun of rape victims or making jokes about rape? Why was that okay?” “Why did you guys dismiss the New York Times story — simply because the victim in that case was a Republican?” “Those are legitimate questions that the Democrats decided did not need to be adequately answered...” [Abby Phillip suddenly turns serious and “gives voice” to the victims.]

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

201,249 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Lyman: Kemp did come out with a risk limiting audit report, which did clarify there were 36 inconsistencies. Phillip: Did they say the election was fair and there was no fraud? Lyman: They’re saying there were problems with the election. Phillip: That is not true. Kemp did not say that. He pointed out that there were elections that occurred after Donald Trump lost. And those elections were also free and fair, and not to mention that other Republicans who were on the very same ballot as Donald Trump did better than he did. The fact that they found those inconsistencies is actually proof that the system is working. When you argue that the existence of errors is proof of fraud, that makes no sense because we should go back then and audit the Republicans who outperformed trump on that very same ballot. How do you explain that?

Lyman: Kemp did come out with a risk limiting audit report, which did clarify there were 36 inconsistencies. Phillip: Did they say the election was fair and there was no fraud? Lyman: They’re saying there were problems with the election. Phillip: That is not true. Kemp did not say that. He pointed out that there were elections that occurred after Donald Trump lost. And those elections were also free and fair, and not to mention that other Republicans who were on the very same ballot as Donald Trump did better than he did. The fact that they found those inconsistencies is actually proof that the system is working. When you argue that the existence of errors is proof of fraud, that makes no sense because we should go back then and audit the Republicans who outperformed trump on that very same ballot. How do you explain that?

Acyn

153,018 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Jennings: In the case of Miles Taylor, was working in the government anonymously, obviously disseminating information publicly that he should not have been doing. Phillip: Like what? Jennings: Well, I mean, he was anonymously writing pieces for the New York Times and stating publicly that he was trying to undermine the government of the United States Philip: What did he disseminate that he was legally not allowed to do? Jennings: Great thing to find out Phillip: He wrote a book. What’s the allegation? There not allowed to talk about their experiences when they leave government? Jennigs: I’m saying he used his position to try to undermine the sitting president..

Jennings: In the case of Miles Taylor, was working in the government anonymously, obviously disseminating information publicly that he should not have been doing. Phillip: Like what? Jennings: Well, I mean, he was anonymously writing pieces for the New York Times and stating publicly that he was trying to undermine the government of the United States Philip: What did he disseminate that he was legally not allowed to do? Jennings: Great thing to find out Phillip: He wrote a book. What’s the allegation? There not allowed to talk about their experiences when they leave government? Jennigs: I’m saying he used his position to try to undermine the sitting president..

Acyn

445,603 просмотров • 1 год назад