Ray Peat thought communism was akin to an evolving, biological-like process, and a stagnant, cancerous oligarchy would be impossible under such conditions. Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 echoes Ray's thoughts in a recent debate:

@InfraHaz Hi @dannyroddy! I'd love to send you an open invite to come on my podcast @CancellledPod to talk all things health and nutrition. I'd love for you to impart your knowledge! Please message me if you're interested. -Brigid

@InfraHaz @CancellledPod Hey Brigid, I really appreciate the invite. I swore off interviews this year, but if you'll have me next year, I’d be happy to chat.

@InfraHaz Ray Peat - Master of the Eastern Medicinal Science...

@InfraHaz The wignat peaters ain’t gonna like this one

@InfraHaz

@InfraHaz Solzhentisyn comes up in the full debate:

This has to be some of the most trite dialogue I have come across on X. Communism ends poorly time after time again. Multi-national corporatism isn’t the same as free-market capitalism. And accepting communist ideology because someone is dissatisfied with multi-national corporatism seems like the fastest track to the death of individual sovereignty. People with colossal power operate within any and all systems and the communist Marxist type will destroy the individual by centralizing power to government. This guy is confusing individual sovereignty with totalitarian government rule via communist ideology.

@InfraHaz My personal thinking is that centralized governance, of any kind, on a large enough scale is cancerous; solutions appeal to the lowest common denominator. A family of 4 can easily delegate tasks and resources based needs and ability. Doing that across millions is unsustainable.

@InfraHaz Jay isn't a communist, but I think he dismantles the libertarian ethos here:

@InfraHaz based