Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Reagan knew...

A Man Of Memes

701,942 subscribers

253,557 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von John Potter

John Pottervor 2 Jahren

Both himself & President Trump are non lawyers & you wonder why America was at its best with those 2 leading the Way & besides they both had enough money so another plus ♥️🇺🇸♥️🇺🇸

Profilbild von 𝓢𝓹𝓾𝓷𝓴𝔂 Conservative 𝓟𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓽🙏🏻🇺🇸🍎

𝓢𝓹𝓾𝓷𝓴𝔂 Conservative 𝓟𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓽🙏🏻🇺🇸🍎vor 2 Jahren

Reagan and Trump are the greatest Presidents of my lifetime. 👊🏻💥

Profilbild von 🇺🇸Roger Bernards🍊

🇺🇸Roger Bernards🍊vor 2 Jahren

Reagan was a Great man! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Profilbild von Wise Old Bastards

Wise Old Bastardsvor 2 Jahren

Regan’s words are true today Wise man. Great president Politics don’t seem to change Most politicians are just self serving self enriching & want to retain power

Profilbild von Holy Mackerel

Holy Mackerelvor 2 Jahren

Great speech. He had it right. He could see the dangers of socialism and a government's desire to control the people. I wish we had some orators and Patriots that were as good as Reagan at convincing the masses about the dangers of a government that is out of control and bent on taking over people's lives no matter what the cost to their freedoms.

Profilbild von Luca 1

Luca 1vor 2 Jahren

If REGAN KNEW.. YOU KNOW DAMN WELL SO DID TRUMP THEN‼️

Profilbild von Michelle #AmericaFirst

Michelle #AmericaFirstvor 2 Jahren

@CNforUSA So on point!

Profilbild von Christian Potra 🇺🇸🇷🇴

Christian Potra 🇺🇸🇷🇴vor 2 Jahren

@donaldrusso994 We are the last light to this world. While America is still free there is still hope. Praise the Lord for all Americans that want this to continue.

Profilbild von Kevin Norman

Kevin Normanvor 2 Jahren

Listen to Ronald Reagan. So true today!

Profilbild von Kathy Tipton

Kathy Tiptonvor 2 Jahren

Nixon knew too.

Ähnliche Videos

Reagan knew the truth.

Reagan knew the truth.

Gunther Eagleman™

80,317 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ronald Reagan knew a good showbiz joke when he heard one.

Ronald Reagan knew a good showbiz joke when he heard one.

Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute

13,462 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

President Reagan knew that even politicians should be able to laugh at themselves.

President Reagan knew that even politicians should be able to laugh at themselves.

Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute

17,336 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Brit Hume: “The Republican Party we knew, the Reagan Republican Party is gone.” Fact check: true

Brit Hume: “The Republican Party we knew, the Reagan Republican Party is gone.” Fact check: true

Republicans against Trump

1,175,254 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Because laughter should be contagious and Ronald Reagan always knew how to make a joke count.

Because laughter should be contagious and Ronald Reagan always knew how to make a joke count.

Dimitris Soudas 🇨🇦⚜️🇬🇷☦️ 13.12.1943

28,660 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I think this was the Moment Mondale said he knew he had lost! Ronald Reagan was so funny Mondale couldn’t help but laugh.

I think this was the Moment Mondale said he knew he had lost! Ronald Reagan was so funny Mondale couldn’t help but laugh.

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

183,640 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I’m tired of our party losing. As Reagan understood, successful politics is about addition and multiplication, not subtraction and division. Reagan knew that a major course correction was essential if we were to get back to winning elections and governing again.

I’m tired of our party losing. As Reagan understood, successful politics is about addition and multiplication, not subtraction and division. Reagan knew that a major course correction was essential if we were to get back to winning elections and governing again.

Governor Larry Hogan

38,394 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"Ronald Reagan loved tariffs. And they said he didn't. And I guess it was AI or something. They cheated badly. Canada got caught cheating on a commercial ... Crooked ad. They knew Ronald Reagan loved tariffs... That's dirty playing but I can play dirtier than they can" - Trump

"Ronald Reagan loved tariffs. And they said he didn't. And I guess it was AI or something. They cheated badly. Canada got caught cheating on a commercial ... Crooked ad. They knew Ronald Reagan loved tariffs... That's dirty playing but I can play dirtier than they can" - Trump

Howard Mortman

1,007,734 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

President Reagan was absolutely the real deal. He knew this back in the 1980s. I wonder what he would say if he could see 2024? 👀🔥🔉

President Reagan was absolutely the real deal. He knew this back in the 1980s. I wonder what he would say if he could see 2024? 👀🔥🔉

AmericanPapaBear

45,474 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Steven Spielberg, allegedly privy to insider knowledge, is directing a new film titled Disclosure. After screening Close Encounters of the Third Kind for President Reagan at the White House, Reagan reportedly stood and declared that several people in the room knew everything depicted in the movie was entirely true. #Ufotwitter #Disclosure

🚨 Steven Spielberg, allegedly privy to insider knowledge, is directing a new film titled Disclosure. After screening Close Encounters of the Third Kind for President Reagan at the White House, Reagan reportedly stood and declared that several people in the room knew everything depicted in the movie was entirely true. #Ufotwitter #Disclosure

T R U T H P O L E

168,892 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Reagan knew that what is going on today would happen, warning that without vigilance, the loss of individual freedoms and the rise of government overreach could threaten the very foundation of America.😎

Reagan knew that what is going on today would happen, warning that without vigilance, the loss of individual freedoms and the rise of government overreach could threaten the very foundation of America.😎

🇺🇸Lady Vet

14,040 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hollywood producer Brent Friedman says a Reagan-era official, John Herrington told him aliens are real, he’s seen them, and that he would cry himself to sleep every night over what he knew. 👀

Hollywood producer Brent Friedman says a Reagan-era official, John Herrington told him aliens are real, he’s seen them, and that he would cry himself to sleep every night over what he knew. 👀

Astral🛸

172,031 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

FIRST LOOK: “BUSHWHACKED”, The Latest Upcoming Book By Roger Stone Unveils Previously Unreleased Facts About The Assassination Attempt On Ronald Reagan, What The First Lady Knew And Much More. MUST-WATCH/SHARE This Inside Baseball Directly From Roger Himself! 🔴WATCH & CHAT LIVE NOW!⬇️

FIRST LOOK: “BUSHWHACKED”, The Latest Upcoming Book By Roger Stone Unveils Previously Unreleased Facts About The Assassination Attempt On Ronald Reagan, What The First Lady Knew And Much More. MUST-WATCH/SHARE This Inside Baseball Directly From Roger Himself! 🔴WATCH & CHAT LIVE NOW!⬇️

Alex Jones

81,585 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

"[President Nixon] knew those things were illegal or improper but now we see President Trump doing them openly and regularly." Mark Wolf, a Reagan-appointed judge, talks to CNN's Erica Hill about why he's quitting the bench over President Trump's "assault on the rule of law." #OutFrontCNN

"[President Nixon] knew those things were illegal or improper but now we see President Trump doing them openly and regularly." Mark Wolf, a Reagan-appointed judge, talks to CNN's Erica Hill about why he's quitting the bench over President Trump's "assault on the rule of law." #OutFrontCNN

Erin Burnett OutFront

64,381 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

“The image of George Washington kneeling in prayer in the snow is one of the most famous in American history. He personified a people who knew it was not enough to depend on their own courage and goodness; they must also seek help from God, their Father and Preserver.” - Ronald Reagan, 1983

“The image of George Washington kneeling in prayer in the snow is one of the most famous in American history. He personified a people who knew it was not enough to depend on their own courage and goodness; they must also seek help from God, their Father and Preserver.” - Ronald Reagan, 1983

Dan Crenshaw

85,471 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Watters: If the doctor knew this guy wasn't up to it and someone else had the autopen and they were signing stuff that is now law of the land, than that law is now bunk. Ford: What if we call back doctors who saw Reagan? Watters: That is the 80s, this is last year.

Watters: If the doctor knew this guy wasn't up to it and someone else had the autopen and they were signing stuff that is now law of the land, than that law is now bunk. Ford: What if we call back doctors who saw Reagan? Watters: That is the 80s, this is last year.

Acyn

121,623 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Before Charlie Kirk, there was Ronald Reagan. This morning, I recalled the speech Reagan gave after Martin Luther King's assassination. The year was 1968—two days after King was killed. In his singular voice, Reagan presciently and tragically laid out the fight he knew was coming for us today. Most Americans did not listen to Reagan then. Charlie Kirk was one of the few who did. Now, 57 years later, will we finally listen? Of course, watch the video to feel the power of Reagan. For those who can't, a partial transcript: “I have listened to their hopes and hopelessness, and I’ve heard their plea. And curiously enough, it is not for more welfare. It’s for jobs. And it is for good schooling and discipline in those schools… “And I have to ask myself why, why in all these recent years have we Republicans let this whole humanitarian field be preempted by the opposition when their record in the entire field of welfare, and in their entire field of human relations, is one of colossal and almost complete failure. “Their whole big government approach has institutionalized poverty, perpetuating its degradation until welfare becomes a way of life under the second and third generation of recipient families. “They have tried this raising of people by mass movements, while our philosophy is based on a belief in the individual, in his freedom and in his rights. And in this area of human relations, we're dealing with individuals—each one of these people unique, each one crying out in his soul for his rightful heritage of dignity and the right to shape his own destiny. “But we have a chance to prove, as Republicans, to prove that we're more than just negative critics. We have a chance to prove that ours—ours—is the wave of the future.”

Before Charlie Kirk, there was Ronald Reagan. This morning, I recalled the speech Reagan gave after Martin Luther King's assassination. The year was 1968—two days after King was killed. In his singular voice, Reagan presciently and tragically laid out the fight he knew was coming for us today. Most Americans did not listen to Reagan then. Charlie Kirk was one of the few who did. Now, 57 years later, will we finally listen? Of course, watch the video to feel the power of Reagan. For those who can't, a partial transcript: “I have listened to their hopes and hopelessness, and I’ve heard their plea. And curiously enough, it is not for more welfare. It’s for jobs. And it is for good schooling and discipline in those schools… “And I have to ask myself why, why in all these recent years have we Republicans let this whole humanitarian field be preempted by the opposition when their record in the entire field of welfare, and in their entire field of human relations, is one of colossal and almost complete failure. “Their whole big government approach has institutionalized poverty, perpetuating its degradation until welfare becomes a way of life under the second and third generation of recipient families. “They have tried this raising of people by mass movements, while our philosophy is based on a belief in the individual, in his freedom and in his rights. And in this area of human relations, we're dealing with individuals—each one of these people unique, each one crying out in his soul for his rightful heritage of dignity and the right to shape his own destiny. “But we have a chance to prove, as Republicans, to prove that we're more than just negative critics. We have a chance to prove that ours—ours—is the wave of the future.”

Eli Steele

323,087 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🇺🇸 Trump, Reagan, and the fantasy of global cleansing By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 When Lindsey Graham explains that Donald Trump has "finished the job Reagan couldn't do," it becomes clear that we are no longer talking about foreign policy but mythology. In this heroic fresco, Ronald Reagan becomes the warm-up, Trump the definitive version, the muscular DLC of the Cold War. Reagan had the doctrine, the speeches about the "evil empire," the Contras, anti-Soviet Afghanistan. But he stopped short of the great temptation: direct, frontal, assumed overthrow. Graham, on the other hand, fantasizes about diplomacy by force: Maduro in prison, Cuba "next," Iran collapsing, and the Ayatollah transformed into the frozen captain of a terrorist Titanic. The problem is that history is less docile than television sets. Take Venezuela. Even if Nicolás Maduro is weakened, the idea that a regime will automatically fall because its leader has been neutralized is strategically simplistic. Iraq has shown that removing a leader does not erase security structures, networks of allegiance, or the power vacuum. A centralized autocracy is often replaced by unstable fragmentation. Cuba? Sixty years of embargo have not overthrown Fidel Castro or his legacy. To imagine that "their days are numbered" is more of a wishful thinking than intelligence. Regimes under external pressure tend to harden, not evaporate. As for Iran, describing it as the "mother ship of terrorism" is a classic rhetorical device. Yes, Tehran finances and arms non-state actors. Yes, the IRGC projects its regional influence. But to believe that a head-on collision would cause a rapid collapse is to ignore the institutional depth of the Iranian system: regular army, Revolutionary Guards, economic networks, religious apparatus. Even if decapitated, the system does not disappear; it rebuilds itself. What Graham is selling is a Netflix-style foreign policy: one villain per season, an explosive finale, credits. Reality, on the other hand, works through long chains of causality, regional reactions, budgetary costs, and strategic fatigue. For behind the proclaimed gold standard lies a simple question: how many simultaneous fronts can a power open without exhausting itself? Venezuela, Cuba, Iran... Each theater mobilizes resources, coercive diplomacy, and military capabilities. But American power is not infinite, and each escalation creates opposing alignments. The comparison with Reagan is revealing. Reagan combined military pressure with negotiation with Moscow. He knew how to talk to Gorbachev. Graham's vision, on the other hand, seems to prefer outright collapse to managing the balance of power. In short, this rhetoric transforms foreign policy into a contest of historical virility. Trump would surpass Reagan because he strikes harder, faster, and more directly. But geopolitics is not a rodeo: overthrowing a regime is spectacular; managing the aftermath is strategic. And it is often there that empires discover that the fall of a captain does not always sink the ship.

🇺🇸 Trump, Reagan, and the fantasy of global cleansing By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 When Lindsey Graham explains that Donald Trump has "finished the job Reagan couldn't do," it becomes clear that we are no longer talking about foreign policy but mythology. In this heroic fresco, Ronald Reagan becomes the warm-up, Trump the definitive version, the muscular DLC of the Cold War. Reagan had the doctrine, the speeches about the "evil empire," the Contras, anti-Soviet Afghanistan. But he stopped short of the great temptation: direct, frontal, assumed overthrow. Graham, on the other hand, fantasizes about diplomacy by force: Maduro in prison, Cuba "next," Iran collapsing, and the Ayatollah transformed into the frozen captain of a terrorist Titanic. The problem is that history is less docile than television sets. Take Venezuela. Even if Nicolás Maduro is weakened, the idea that a regime will automatically fall because its leader has been neutralized is strategically simplistic. Iraq has shown that removing a leader does not erase security structures, networks of allegiance, or the power vacuum. A centralized autocracy is often replaced by unstable fragmentation. Cuba? Sixty years of embargo have not overthrown Fidel Castro or his legacy. To imagine that "their days are numbered" is more of a wishful thinking than intelligence. Regimes under external pressure tend to harden, not evaporate. As for Iran, describing it as the "mother ship of terrorism" is a classic rhetorical device. Yes, Tehran finances and arms non-state actors. Yes, the IRGC projects its regional influence. But to believe that a head-on collision would cause a rapid collapse is to ignore the institutional depth of the Iranian system: regular army, Revolutionary Guards, economic networks, religious apparatus. Even if decapitated, the system does not disappear; it rebuilds itself. What Graham is selling is a Netflix-style foreign policy: one villain per season, an explosive finale, credits. Reality, on the other hand, works through long chains of causality, regional reactions, budgetary costs, and strategic fatigue. For behind the proclaimed gold standard lies a simple question: how many simultaneous fronts can a power open without exhausting itself? Venezuela, Cuba, Iran... Each theater mobilizes resources, coercive diplomacy, and military capabilities. But American power is not infinite, and each escalation creates opposing alignments. The comparison with Reagan is revealing. Reagan combined military pressure with negotiation with Moscow. He knew how to talk to Gorbachev. Graham's vision, on the other hand, seems to prefer outright collapse to managing the balance of power. In short, this rhetoric transforms foreign policy into a contest of historical virility. Trump would surpass Reagan because he strikes harder, faster, and more directly. But geopolitics is not a rodeo: overthrowing a regime is spectacular; managing the aftermath is strategic. And it is often there that empires discover that the fall of a captain does not always sink the ship.

Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆

16,272 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This video is for Bernie Bro Cenk Uygur. Perhaps it will help him begin his journey to economic literacy. During our debate on Piers Morgan Uncensored, he had a near emotional breakdown about Trump’s corporate tax cuts, reciting the same old tired talking points about “helping your rich donors.” First off, Cenk, your cult icon Bernie Sanders takes millions of dollars from rich donors. But let’s put that aside. Let’s dissect the basic economics of taxes. Corporations don’t pay taxes, they pass them along. To who? Well, to their employees first of all, especially the most expendable ones. They lay off people or reduce salaries. Businesses also raise prices on their products, because they *have to*. If they can’t lose any employees or raise prices (market driven decisions, after all), then they’ll just go out of business or at best stop expanding. No more new investments in factories, people, or technologies. When you hike taxes on businesses, it’s ORDINARY AMERICANS who pay the price. Cenk doesn’t get this because he’s a millionaire that never built anything except a platform where he derides millionaires. Kind of ironic. Since he wouldn’t listen to me, maybe President Ronald Reagan can help him out. Reagan took office in 1981, inheriting one of the worst economies in American history from another one-term Democrat. He faced runaway inflation, sky-high interest rates, and rising unemployment—American productivity had been decimated by years of government overreach. Reagan knew that more government wasn’t the solution; it was the problem. Watch him lay it out here.

This video is for Bernie Bro Cenk Uygur. Perhaps it will help him begin his journey to economic literacy. During our debate on Piers Morgan Uncensored, he had a near emotional breakdown about Trump’s corporate tax cuts, reciting the same old tired talking points about “helping your rich donors.” First off, Cenk, your cult icon Bernie Sanders takes millions of dollars from rich donors. But let’s put that aside. Let’s dissect the basic economics of taxes. Corporations don’t pay taxes, they pass them along. To who? Well, to their employees first of all, especially the most expendable ones. They lay off people or reduce salaries. Businesses also raise prices on their products, because they have to. If they can’t lose any employees or raise prices (market driven decisions, after all), then they’ll just go out of business or at best stop expanding. No more new investments in factories, people, or technologies. When you hike taxes on businesses, it’s ORDINARY AMERICANS who pay the price. Cenk doesn’t get this because he’s a millionaire that never built anything except a platform where he derides millionaires. Kind of ironic. Since he wouldn’t listen to me, maybe President Ronald Reagan can help him out. Reagan took office in 1981, inheriting one of the worst economies in American history from another one-term Democrat. He faced runaway inflation, sky-high interest rates, and rising unemployment—American productivity had been decimated by years of government overreach. Reagan knew that more government wasn’t the solution; it was the problem. Watch him lay it out here.

Dan Crenshaw

66,747 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr