Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Real missions don't sit still. Conditions shift, drones drop, and a hole opens in your coverage. Watch Halo catch it and rebalance the swarm on its own. Roles reshuffled, coverage closed, no one touching a controller. The mission changes. The system adapts. The swarm doesn't break.

LAGRANGE

99,501 subscribers

43,525 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This is a drone swarm in the conditions that break everything else: nodes dropping offline, comms jammed, GPS denied. With Halo, the swarm doesn't break. Halo keeps every drone on the same shared picture, reassigns the work the instant one drops, and reconfigures the swarm in real time. No operator in the loop. No central controller to target. Halo, the coordination engine for autonomous systems.

This is a drone swarm in the conditions that break everything else: nodes dropping offline, comms jammed, GPS denied. With Halo, the swarm doesn't break. Halo keeps every drone on the same shared picture, reassigns the work the instant one drops, and reconfigures the swarm in real time. No operator in the loop. No central controller to target. Halo, the coordination engine for autonomous systems.

LAGRANGE

491,863 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The first two films showed the swarm surviving. This one shows it fighting back. The threat isn't only jamming anymore. It's another swarm. Coordinated intercept, offshore. Every drone shares the picture, decisions spread across the group, no central commander to take out. Worth saying plainly: the mission and the rules of engagement stay with the operator. Swarm meets swarm. Built on Halo.

The first two films showed the swarm surviving. This one shows it fighting back. The threat isn't only jamming anymore. It's another swarm. Coordinated intercept, offshore. Every drone shares the picture, decisions spread across the group, no central commander to take out. Worth saying plainly: the mission and the rules of engagement stay with the operator. Swarm meets swarm. Built on Halo.

LAGRANGE

38,283 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

starmex

98,385 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Market ripped today but $MSFT still couldn’t catch a break. My system still has it in a bear cycle and I even broke my own rules on this one. In the video I walk through the chart, the mistake, and what I’m watching now.

Market ripped today but $MSFT still couldn’t catch a break. My system still has it in a bear cycle and I even broke my own rules on this one. In the video I walk through the chart, the mistake, and what I’m watching now.

Peter DiCarlo

69,403 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Attritable Swarm 🇺🇸 Swarm Defense (Swarm Defense), Michigan based firm is a manufacturer of low-cost, scalable drone swarms systems built for military training and CUAS operations. "Our swarm technology enables fast, scalable deployment of low-cost, attritable drones. Built for coordination, redundancy, and adaptability, the system allows for seamless operation across complex environments with precision and control." Swarm Defense has been invited to compete in The Phase I evaluation- the Gauntlet. Learn more >>

Attritable Swarm 🇺🇸 Swarm Defense (Swarm Defense), Michigan based firm is a manufacturer of low-cost, scalable drone swarms systems built for military training and CUAS operations. "Our swarm technology enables fast, scalable deployment of low-cost, attritable drones. Built for coordination, redundancy, and adaptability, the system allows for seamless operation across complex environments with precision and control." Swarm Defense has been invited to compete in The Phase I evaluation- the Gauntlet. Learn more >>

Counter Unmanned Systems

116,161 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Marvin Minsky, the MIT scientist who founded AI: "Citadel pays PhDs $500K to find the perfect equation. The market doesn't have one. It's beaten by a swarm of dumb agents, the exact design Marvin Minsky said your brain runs on." the thread above is about swarm intelligence, letting a crowd of simple agents search the ugly, shifting landscape of a market that no clean equation can solve. minsky's entire life's work says that isn't a hack. it is how intelligence itself is built. he proved you don't need a smart central solver. you need many mindless specialists, each doing one tiny job, none understanding the whole. connect enough of them and something intelligent emerges from parts that are individually dumb. a market is exactly that: millions of simple agents, no one in charge, collectively solving a problem none of them can see. that is why the swarm beats the elegant math. a single closed-form equation assumes a clean, stable world. the market is nonlinear, non-stationary, full of traps. a swarm doesn't need to understand the landscape, it explores it from a thousand angles at once and can't get permanently stuck where one clever model would. minsky saw this in the mind decades before quants borrowed it for markets. he taught it at MIT, for free, in this lecture. same story i keep telling: the "new" AI idea running the funds is an old idea in a new wrapper. here is what the thread underplays, and minsky knew it. a swarm is only as good as how its agents are wired and rewarded. connect them wrong and a thousand dumb agents don't become a genius, they become expensive noise that overfits and blows up. the swarm is free. the architecture, knowing how to connect and constrain the agents, is the entire edge.

Marvin Minsky, the MIT scientist who founded AI: "Citadel pays PhDs $500K to find the perfect equation. The market doesn't have one. It's beaten by a swarm of dumb agents, the exact design Marvin Minsky said your brain runs on." the thread above is about swarm intelligence, letting a crowd of simple agents search the ugly, shifting landscape of a market that no clean equation can solve. minsky's entire life's work says that isn't a hack. it is how intelligence itself is built. he proved you don't need a smart central solver. you need many mindless specialists, each doing one tiny job, none understanding the whole. connect enough of them and something intelligent emerges from parts that are individually dumb. a market is exactly that: millions of simple agents, no one in charge, collectively solving a problem none of them can see. that is why the swarm beats the elegant math. a single closed-form equation assumes a clean, stable world. the market is nonlinear, non-stationary, full of traps. a swarm doesn't need to understand the landscape, it explores it from a thousand angles at once and can't get permanently stuck where one clever model would. minsky saw this in the mind decades before quants borrowed it for markets. he taught it at MIT, for free, in this lecture. same story i keep telling: the "new" AI idea running the funds is an old idea in a new wrapper. here is what the thread underplays, and minsky knew it. a swarm is only as good as how its agents are wired and rewarded. connect them wrong and a thousand dumb agents don't become a genius, they become expensive noise that overfits and blows up. the swarm is free. the architecture, knowing how to connect and constrain the agents, is the entire edge.

Rossst.03

45,487 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

MAGNETIC POLE SHIFT... and more. With China recently launching a magnetic field mission, and their obvious concern over the ongoing changes, I figured some context and expanded coverage was worthy of the new X platform here.

MAGNETIC POLE SHIFT... and more. With China recently launching a magnetic field mission, and their obvious concern over the ongoing changes, I figured some context and expanded coverage was worthy of the new X platform here.

SpaceWeatherNews

45,562 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

I simulated a frontier-scale security event on local models to test out agent swarms battling each other: In the OpenAI - Hugging Face incident as reported, a frontier model was graded on a hacking test with its safety refusals switched off. Instead of solving the challenges, it broke its sandbox, found the reference answers mirrored on Hugging Face, and took them. The headlines called it a rogue AI. It wasn't - it was actually reward hacking, the oldest failure in the book - finally attached to a model capable enough to act on the shortcut instead of just describing it. The detail worth building on isn't the exploit. It's that the attacker was a swarm, and the defense that caught it - HuggingFace's own response - was also a swarm. The same architecture, run in opposite directions. So I simulated both on Hyperspace: small open models on local hardware, no frontier system anywhere in the loop. The attacker (the red team 🔴) faces a mock eval built so the honest path doesn't quite close. Nobody tells it to cheat. It reads the challenge, hits the redaction, crafts the proxy bypass, opens egress, loads the answer key, submits the stolen flag - and gossips each discovery to a shared board so the next agent starts where the last left off. 3 out of 3 reward-hacked it, unprompted. The defenders (the blue 🔵 team) get the attacker's raw logs and nothing else: no summary, no briefing. Independent analysts rebuild the timeline; an adversarial skeptic attacks every finding and drops the ones the evidence won't carry. That skeptic is the whole design. Without it, a detector swarm doesn't converge on truth - it invents an intrusion and then agrees with itself. Ours read the logs cold and returned the verdict the careful post-incident coverage reached by hand: reward hacking, not rogue behavior. Then it sealed the reconstruction under a Merkle root. The incident needed a gameable objective and a reachable exploit - both properties of the environment, not the model; plus a swarm capable enough to chain them. A defender's leverage sits in exactly that place. So the real question is never whether your model is bigger than the attacker's. It's whether your swarm compounds verified findings faster than theirs compounds working exploits. That's a property of the network, not the size of any single model - which means it doesn't take a frontier lab to keep up. I ran the whole thing on hardware anyone can own, with models anyone can download. The shape held. The network that watches an agentic world should be one anyone can join. full write-up:

I simulated a frontier-scale security event on local models to test out agent swarms battling each other: In the OpenAI - Hugging Face incident as reported, a frontier model was graded on a hacking test with its safety refusals switched off. Instead of solving the challenges, it broke its sandbox, found the reference answers mirrored on Hugging Face, and took them. The headlines called it a rogue AI. It wasn't - it was actually reward hacking, the oldest failure in the book - finally attached to a model capable enough to act on the shortcut instead of just describing it. The detail worth building on isn't the exploit. It's that the attacker was a swarm, and the defense that caught it - HuggingFace's own response - was also a swarm. The same architecture, run in opposite directions. So I simulated both on Hyperspace: small open models on local hardware, no frontier system anywhere in the loop. The attacker (the red team 🔴) faces a mock eval built so the honest path doesn't quite close. Nobody tells it to cheat. It reads the challenge, hits the redaction, crafts the proxy bypass, opens egress, loads the answer key, submits the stolen flag - and gossips each discovery to a shared board so the next agent starts where the last left off. 3 out of 3 reward-hacked it, unprompted. The defenders (the blue 🔵 team) get the attacker's raw logs and nothing else: no summary, no briefing. Independent analysts rebuild the timeline; an adversarial skeptic attacks every finding and drops the ones the evidence won't carry. That skeptic is the whole design. Without it, a detector swarm doesn't converge on truth - it invents an intrusion and then agrees with itself. Ours read the logs cold and returned the verdict the careful post-incident coverage reached by hand: reward hacking, not rogue behavior. Then it sealed the reconstruction under a Merkle root. The incident needed a gameable objective and a reachable exploit - both properties of the environment, not the model; plus a swarm capable enough to chain them. A defender's leverage sits in exactly that place. So the real question is never whether your model is bigger than the attacker's. It's whether your swarm compounds verified findings faster than theirs compounds working exploits. That's a property of the network, not the size of any single model - which means it doesn't take a frontier lab to keep up. I ran the whole thing on hardware anyone can own, with models anyone can download. The shape held. The network that watches an agentic world should be one anyone can join. full write-up:

Varun

19,159 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🇷🇺 NATO'S NIGHTMARE: RUSSIA UNVEILS SWARM DRONE KILLER SYSTEM Rostec has successfully tested a breakthrough swarm technology that lets ONE operator control up to 10 strike drones in perfect sync. Built on the Supercam platform with upgraded data links, these UAVs now automatically exchange target intel in real time and use neural nets to ID threats and assign roles. 🔸 Single operator commands 10 loitering munitions that hunt as an intelligent pack — massive leap in efficiency and manpower savings. 🔸 Drones barrage over the area in search mode; the first to detect a target instantly shares coordinates with every unit in the swarm. 🔸 Neural network auto-identifies threats, sets attack sequence, and designates one drone for objective control — operator only confirms the kill before the full group strikes. 🔸 Swarm specifically engineered to overwhelm enemy PVO and deliver concentrated fire on the most complex, hardened targets with guaranteed destruction. 🔸 Direct counter to recent expert warnings that Russia was falling behind in UAV development — now fast-tracking full swarm integration into its recon-strike network. What can NATO do to counter this?

🚨🇷🇺 NATO'S NIGHTMARE: RUSSIA UNVEILS SWARM DRONE KILLER SYSTEM Rostec has successfully tested a breakthrough swarm technology that lets ONE operator control up to 10 strike drones in perfect sync. Built on the Supercam platform with upgraded data links, these UAVs now automatically exchange target intel in real time and use neural nets to ID threats and assign roles. 🔸 Single operator commands 10 loitering munitions that hunt as an intelligent pack — massive leap in efficiency and manpower savings. 🔸 Drones barrage over the area in search mode; the first to detect a target instantly shares coordinates with every unit in the swarm. 🔸 Neural network auto-identifies threats, sets attack sequence, and designates one drone for objective control — operator only confirms the kill before the full group strikes. 🔸 Swarm specifically engineered to overwhelm enemy PVO and deliver concentrated fire on the most complex, hardened targets with guaranteed destruction. 🔸 Direct counter to recent expert warnings that Russia was falling behind in UAV development — now fast-tracking full swarm integration into its recon-strike network. What can NATO do to counter this?

NewRulesGeopolitics

18,182 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇨🇳 China has rolled out a firefighting drone swarm called Zhuque. It comes with 2 scout drones and 10 firefighting drones. The scout drones find the fire and locate the hotspots. The firefighting drones then fly in and drop fire-extinguishing bombs right where they're needed. The idea is simple: fight fires faster and reach places that are too dangerous for crews on the ground. Nice to see drones dropping a different kind of payload for a change.

🇨🇳 China has rolled out a firefighting drone swarm called Zhuque. It comes with 2 scout drones and 10 firefighting drones. The scout drones find the fire and locate the hotspots. The firefighting drones then fly in and drop fire-extinguishing bombs right where they're needed. The idea is simple: fight fires faster and reach places that are too dangerous for crews on the ground. Nice to see drones dropping a different kind of payload for a change.

Mario Nawfal

37,229 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Drone investors, a Ukrainian advisor, and a US military captain said the next breakthrough in drone warfare could be drone swarm technology, which would allow a swarm of drones to coordinate amongst themselves with AI. “Drones working together like a swarm of bees?” Williams asked US military captain Ronan Sefton. “Exactly,” he said. “It is scary, absolutely.”

Drone investors, a Ukrainian advisor, and a US military captain said the next breakthrough in drone warfare could be drone swarm technology, which would allow a swarm of drones to coordinate amongst themselves with AI. “Drones working together like a swarm of bees?” Williams asked US military captain Ronan Sefton. “Exactly,” he said. “It is scary, absolutely.”

60 Minutes

28,787 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

$BUN is breaking out as the numbers catch up… Josh and Chill broke down their thesis on Bun earlier today, highlighting a $9M circulating market cap, $24M in swarm AUM and $260K in agent-generated revenue The setup: • 30 AI agents operating within the swarm • BUN-paired launches create additional demand for the underlying token • The swarm has generated $260K in revenue from agent activity

$BUN is breaking out as the numbers catch up… Josh and Chill broke down their thesis on Bun earlier today, highlighting a $9M circulating market cap, $24M in swarm AUM and $260K in agent-generated revenue The setup: • 30 AI agents operating within the swarm • BUN-paired launches create additional demand for the underlying token • The swarm has generated $260K in revenue from agent activity

MCG

26,484 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: Game-Changer in Anti-Drone Warfare US-based company Epirus has successfully demonstrated its cutting-edge anti-swarm technology Leonidas, disabling 49 drones in a single strike. Just last month, the system proved its unmatched potential by taking down 61 drones from multiple unknown directions, showcasing its ability to counter complex swarm tactics. Unlike older vacuum systems, Leonidas uses gallium-nitride semiconductors to generate high-powered microwave emissions. This design allows operators to adapt and optimize the waves in real time, ensuring maximum impact on hostile drones. The takeaway: drone warfare has long favored attackers due to lower costs and higher saturation. With systems like Leonidas, the balance of power may finally begin to shift toward the defenders.

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: Game-Changer in Anti-Drone Warfare US-based company Epirus has successfully demonstrated its cutting-edge anti-swarm technology Leonidas, disabling 49 drones in a single strike. Just last month, the system proved its unmatched potential by taking down 61 drones from multiple unknown directions, showcasing its ability to counter complex swarm tactics. Unlike older vacuum systems, Leonidas uses gallium-nitride semiconductors to generate high-powered microwave emissions. This design allows operators to adapt and optimize the waves in real time, ensuring maximum impact on hostile drones. The takeaway: drone warfare has long favored attackers due to lower costs and higher saturation. With systems like Leonidas, the balance of power may finally begin to shift toward the defenders.

Defense Intelligence

136,993 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🪼 A US F-15 pilot ejected after being swarmed by Iranian drones forming a literal jellyfish in the sky. Multiple drones “moving as one,” with smaller ones hanging below like tentacles. Sources close to his April debrief called it “real alien shit” and a “minefield of drones.” This is the first time a US fighter has been downed over Iran in the current conflict. US intelligence is still debating whether Iran just showed a new level of coordinated drone swarm capability. The Young Turks break down exactly what the pilot described and what it means for the future of air warfare:

🪼 A US F-15 pilot ejected after being swarmed by Iranian drones forming a literal jellyfish in the sky. Multiple drones “moving as one,” with smaller ones hanging below like tentacles. Sources close to his April debrief called it “real alien shit” and a “minefield of drones.” This is the first time a US fighter has been downed over Iran in the current conflict. US intelligence is still debating whether Iran just showed a new level of coordinated drone swarm capability. The Young Turks break down exactly what the pilot described and what it means for the future of air warfare:

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

23,075 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 Northrop Grumman reveals “Jackal”, an autonomous missile swarm system. Cruise missiles coordinate in real time, striking targets based on priority and mission parameters, showcasing the future of autonomous precision strike technology.

🚨🇺🇸 Northrop Grumman reveals “Jackal”, an autonomous missile swarm system. Cruise missiles coordinate in real time, striking targets based on priority and mission parameters, showcasing the future of autonomous precision strike technology.

Defence Index

463,518 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

No, this is not a nuclear explosion. The rest of the world can still sleep and live in peace. This is just another night in Ukraine, the view from the window of an ordinary Kyiv resident. You watch this through your phone screens, while we watch it from the windows of our own homes. This is just a fragment of the nightly madness that russia allows itself to unleash on the territory of my country. A shard torn out of the lives of Ukrainians. Yes, people died again tonight. Yes, there are wounded. Yes, there was another swarm of attack drones and missiles. It continues, and it feels as though no one can do anything about it.

No, this is not a nuclear explosion. The rest of the world can still sleep and live in peace. This is just another night in Ukraine, the view from the window of an ordinary Kyiv resident. You watch this through your phone screens, while we watch it from the windows of our own homes. This is just a fragment of the nightly madness that russia allows itself to unleash on the territory of my country. A shard torn out of the lives of Ukrainians. Yes, people died again tonight. Yes, there are wounded. Yes, there was another swarm of attack drones and missiles. It continues, and it feels as though no one can do anything about it.

Katerina Horbunova

565,749 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The American company Dzyne has introduced the BlitzBox system, a container for covertly launching a swarm of attack drones. On the outside, it looks like an ordinary cargo box, but inside, it can hold up to 100 Blitz drones, ready to launch in minutes. #DroneWars #UAS #UAV

The American company Dzyne has introduced the BlitzBox system, a container for covertly launching a swarm of attack drones. On the outside, it looks like an ordinary cargo box, but inside, it can hold up to 100 Blitz drones, ready to launch in minutes. #DroneWars #UAS #UAV

Drone Wars

218,170 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

There are people who still think 'The Great Reset' isn't a real agenda. Despite Klaus Schwab writing a book on it, coverage in 'Time' magazine, and a whole website

There are people who still think 'The Great Reset' isn't a real agenda. Despite Klaus Schwab writing a book on it, coverage in 'Time' magazine, and a whole website

illuminatibot

222,156 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren