ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

Real Training Still Existsโ€ผ๏ธ ๐๐„๐‹๐ˆ๐„๐•๐„ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐‡๐˜๐๐„ BIRMINGHAMโ€™S PREMIER SPORTS PERFORMANCE CENTER โŒCome see us TodayโŒ @xfp_bham #XFP #XFPTrained

10,606 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 3 ๅนดๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

1 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

_ ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
_2 ๅนดๅ‰

@XFP_Bham Hey bro I need to get my son connected with you ASAP!!!!

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

A team tested Pi0, Pi0 Fast, Gr00t, and ACT on real robot arms in manufacturing tasks. (๐Ÿ”– Bookmark this for later!) The task was precise: place thin rectangular frames from a messy stack into a holder. The team fine-tuned each model on 100 real trajectories and compared training time, inference speed, motion quality, and success rates. โฌ‡๏ธ Hereโ€™s a breakdown of what they found Pi0 (Original) โœ… Strongest overall performance in precise pick-and-place โœ… High success rate even in edge cases โœ… Longest training time (~11 hours, ~$30 per run) โœ… Inference time of 80 ms causes short pauses between actions Despite delays, it handles complex scenarios wellโ€ฆ solid for high-precision tasks, but slow to train. Gr00t โœ… Trains fast (~2 hours, ~$5 per run) โœ… Performs almost as well as Pi0 on large-object tasks โœ… Struggles with fine precision; random movement in some trials โœ… More training didnโ€™t fix jitter or random offsets Best suited for tasks where exact precision isnโ€™t critical. Not ready for manufacturing-grade accuracy without more tuning. Pi0 Fast โœ… Promised faster training, but results were underwhelming โœ… Training at 6 hours still showed low success rates โœ… Inference was slower than expected โœ… Not reliable for generalizing even slightly new tasks Currently too unstable for real-world deployment. Doesnโ€™t live up to the โ€œFastโ€ name yet. ACT (Baseline) โœ… 200MB modelโ€”lightweight, but limited โœ… Struggles with stacked objects or ambiguous scenes โœ… Success rates around 70% in best-case setups โœ… Canโ€™t match newer models on precision or generalization Still a solid baseline, but clearly a generation behind in robustness. ๐Ÿšจ Extra Notes All newer models share a common issue: โ€ขInference takes longer than a frame (80 ms vs 33 ms), so robots โ€œpauseโ€ between chunks. โ€ขThis results in jittery movements, but not a dealbreaker unless tasks are time-sensitive. Language-conditioned tasks also fell short: after training on two labeled tasks, the model couldnโ€™t generalize to a third unseen combination using only text prompts. โœ… The good news? These models adapt well to new robot arms with quick fine-tuning. โŒ The bad news? Thereโ€™s still no plug-and-play solution for improving performance after deployment. Reinforcement learning or DAgger-style data collection during real-world operation may be the next big step, something many teams in robotics are actively working on.

Ilir Aliu

21,844 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

โšซ๏ธ UNCANNY VALLEY: AI IN SPORTS โ€” FAIR OR UNFAIR ADVANTAGE? Are we witnessing the end of human merit in sports? Swupnil Sahai ๐ŸŽพ๐Ÿง โ€”ex-Tesla engineer and co-founder of SwingVisionโ€”thinks AI isn't just changing the game. It's redefining the rules, the training, even the players themselves. From iPhones that out-call line judges to AI coaching that levels the field, this episode explores what happens when everyone has a superpowerโ€”and why the next era of sports might feel more like cyborg vs. cyborg. But Swupnil says the real win? It's access. AI could democratize elite performance for everyone. Welcome to The Uncanny Valley Weekly Series with Dr Danish, Fridays at 4:20PM ET, ONLY on ๐•. Episode 8: THE AUGMENTED ATHLETEโ€”ARE WE ALL AI JUICING NOW? 00:22 โ€“ โ€œItโ€™s already better than us at some tasks.โ€ 01:21 โ€“ Why user-friendly AI will explode in the next 24 months. 02:41 โ€“ Most people still underestimate whatโ€™s coming. 04:30 โ€“ Universal basic income? Guardrails? Swupnil says we better start now. 06:08 โ€“ โ€œAI might be more dangerous than nukes.โ€ 07:30 โ€“ The kill switch questionโ€”and why Tesla has it right. 08:27 โ€“ AI is now coaching, calling, and editing your tennis matches. 09:25 โ€“ AI > coach? Why SwingVision is training better and cheaper. 10:29 โ€“ The Elon Musk moment that changed everything. 12:48 โ€“ On-device AI: faster, private, and zero marginal cost. 15:21 โ€“ No data? No problem. Building training sets from scratch. 16:32 โ€“ AI wonโ€™t ruin sportsโ€”it could equalize them. 17:43 โ€“ Microchips and implants: when tech becomes the body. 19:29 โ€“ Will SwingVision become more than sports? 20:00 โ€“ Craziest prediction: AI commentators for every high school game. 21:50 โ€“ Subscription vs. surveillance: the real cost of AI access. 23:42 โ€“ Hardware is kingโ€”and itโ€™s catching up fast. 24:54 โ€“ โ€œ10 people will run the next billion-dollar startup.โ€ 25:33 โ€“ His biggest fear? โ€œRegulation is too slowโ€”and bad actors move fast.โ€ 26:06 โ€“ His message to AGI in 2040: โ€œHey... we come in peace.โ€ 28:33 โ€“ Trusted by pros like Andy Roddick + 100+ D1 teams. 29:36 โ€“ Are we all just juicing with AI now? 30:48 โ€“ โ€œItโ€™s still up to you. Itโ€™s on your racket. Literally.โ€

Mario Nawfal

1,602,951 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

HOW TO LOOK COOL & GET THE GIRL WHEN YOU APPROACH โŒ Home in on the girl you like and ignore her friend whoโ€™s also staring at you โœ… Open both girls at once, talk to both, win them both over โŒ Describe yourself as chasing after her (โ€œcourage to come up to youโ€) โœ… Use a chill opener instead (e.g., โ€œLooks like youโ€™re putting a lot of thought into that decisionโ€) โŒ Ask her name unprompted (โ€œWhatโ€™s your name?โ€; you are seeking information from her) โœ… Offer your name first (โ€œIโ€™m Danielโ€; you are offering value to her) โŒ Shake her hand like itโ€™s a new business partnership โœ… Hold her hand a moment and give it a squeeze without shaking it โŒ Use her foreignness to compliment her looks in another language (โ€œMuy bonita graciasโ€) โœ… Use her foreignness to ask what sheโ€™s doing here (creates an open loop) โŒ Compliment her looks a 3rd time while explaining yourself (โ€œcame up because youโ€™re gorgeousโ€) โœ… Have her comply with you instead (โ€œI love that bracelet. Let me have a look?โ€ [beckon her]) โŒ Get her to show you the lingerie she bought then completely change the topic โœ… Get her to show you the lingerie she bought then flirt over it (โ€œOhโ€ฆ lingerieโ€ฆ what is THAT for??โ€) โŒ Ask her out 40 seconds in after on a non-high point not building any real attraction or connection โœ… Talk to her for at least 2 minutes, build attraction + connection, THEN ask her out on a HIGH point (i.e., she is really engaged, laughing hard, showing a lot of curiosity about you, etc.) Notes from the video: โ€ข During the initial moment, she smile genuinely and eyes him up and down (see her head to toe glance) while quickly finishing what she is doing. She shows initial openness to him. HOWEVERโ€ฆ โ€ข She gives the โ€œOh, goshโ€ eye shut and grimacing nod in response to his โ€œchasing after youโ€ opener. She acknowledges itโ€™s โ€˜funnyโ€™ but still cringe. โ€ข She follows this by PICKING UP HER CUP (which she does not need to do) and holding it in front of herself defensively, creating a barrier between her and him. (If she was into the approach, sheโ€™d leave the cup there and face him without a barrier.) โ€ข After he blasts her with the fourth compliment, she backs away from him while laughing awkwardly and eye codes her friend (whom this guyโ€™s still ignoring) in disbelief. โ€ข When he asks her out on โ€œlike a food dateโ€, she takes two seconds to break eye contact to the side, still with her forced smile, briefly shakes her head โ€œnoโ€, then nods politely and says it โ€œsounds goodโ€ and gives her number (while eye coding her friend again) just to get rid of him. โ€ข After he gets the number, he tells her โ€œNext Friday?โ€ and she doesnโ€™t even need to think about what she has going on or check her schedule because she has no intention of actually meeting this guy, so she just says โ€œNext Friday, perfectโ€ to get this over with. Approach better & avoid these mistakes!

Girls Chase ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ

65,755 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

251118 | VIDEO #SAKURA ment at LE SSERAFIM TOUR 'EASY CRAZY HOT' Encore at Tokyo Dome DAY 1 ๐Ÿฑ: Even when we were waiting in the back, we could still see everyone. At Saitama Super Arena, I already thought, โ€œWow, there are so many FEARNOTโ€ฆโ€, but today, from the sides all the way to the top, the entire space was filled with FEARNOT. It really felt like this place belonged only to us and FEARNOT, and it made us feel like crying. ๐Ÿฑ: FEARNOT say to us, โ€œThank you for bringing us to Tokyo Dome,โ€ but please allow me to say this as well: thank you, FEARNOT, for bringing us to Tokyo Dome. Iโ€™m truly grateful. ๐Ÿฑ: For me personally, this is my return to Tokyo Dome after 11 yearsโ€ฆ When I was 16, I never imagined that 11 years later, I would still be an idol, standing on this stage together with these new members in this way. But through todayโ€™s performance, I truly felt, โ€œAhโ€ฆ Iโ€™m really glad I continued being an idol.โ€ ๐Ÿฑ: Being able to feel this way is entirely thanks to all of you. Whether youโ€™ve supported me for a long time, or only got to know me recently, thank you so much for finding me and for liking me during my time as an idol. ๐Ÿฑ: We still have one more day tomorrow! Will you come again tomorrow? For those coming tomorrow, letโ€™s have even more, more fun together. okay? ๐Ÿฑ: I was really, truly happy today. Thank you, everyone. #์‚ฌ์ฟ ๋ผ #SAKURA #ใƒƒใ‚ฏใƒฉ #ๅฎฎ่„‡ๅ’ฒ่‰ฏ #๋ฅด์„ธ๋ผํ•Œ #LE_SSERAFIM

SAKURA ISLAND

61,355 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 8 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

43 Years Ago Today โ€” On June 3, 1983, WarGames hit theaters and gave us one of the most chilling tech thrillers ever made. A curious kid hacks into a military supercomputer, starts a game of โ€œGlobal Thermonuclear War,โ€ and nearly triggers the real thing. Matthew Broderick, Ally Sheedy, and that unforgettable countdownโ€ฆ pure 80s perfection. Each year I ask Grok how long it would take for it to simulate the same scenario, last year it was about 10 minutes...with a special conditon, Grok emphasised each year... see below. This year, 2026 on the anniversary of the film, I asked Grok (xAIโ€™s AI) the big question from the film: How long would it take a modern AI like Grok to simulate a full Global Thermonuclear War scenario? Answer: Seconds for high-level insights, minutes for detailed probabilistic simulations โ€” a massive leap from WOPRโ€™s 26+ hours in 1983. Computing power and AI have come that far! Each year Grok after my asking this, Grok concludes with... "Yet the movieโ€™s ultimate lesson remains as true today as it was then: โ€œThe only winning move is not to play.โ€" At least we know Grok won't be starting WWIII... I have seen other Ai's coming out with chilling answers, which don't end well for us... us being humans. Wargames the movie is a rollercoaster ride, that still holds up today. Who else still loves this film?

Commodore Computer Museum ๐Ÿ•น

16,892 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

THEY SOLD OUR CHILDREN FOR VOTES. THEN CALLED US RACIST AND FAR RIGHT FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. There comes a moment in this fight when you see the system for what it really is. Not broken. Not failed. Designed to protect itself at the expense of children. You realise they didn't just ignore the abuse, they enabled it. They didn't just fail the victims, they betrayed them. And when communities stood up and said "enough," they weren't listened to. They were attacked and persecuted. Called far-right. Called racist. Called extremist. All for the crime of caring that children were being dragged from school gates, raped, and trafficked while those paid to protect them looked the other way. This was never a scandal. This was policy. Industrial-scale abuse. Sanctioned by silence. Protected by power. Enabled by cowards in every institution that claims to serve the public. For years, they tried to break people like me. Demonise us. Discredit us. Destroy us. Because we refused to be silence by up about what they were covering up. But here's what they never understood: you can't silence the truth forever. And now we're at the endgame. Either they succeed in whitewashing the National Inquiry or politicians start going to prison. There's no middle ground anymore. No further inquiries. No additional reviews. No more "lessons learned." Just accountability. Finally. Watch my latest with James English. Watch it. Share it. Know we're not backing down. This isn't just a conversation. It's evidence. It's testimony. It's proof that we told the truth while they told lies. The cover-up is over. The reckoning has begun. _________ We uncovered the evidence. We proved these were racially motivated crimes. We showed how Labour Party politicians sold children for votes. We exposed every layer of the cover-up. And we forced the national inquiry into the Pakistani Rape Gangs. We got this far because we refused to stay silent. No matter what they did to us. โŒ First, they called us racists and far-right. โŒ Then they encouraged Pakistani gangsters and Islamists to attack us. โŒ When this failed, they launched Operation Hexagon and sent the police after us. โŒ My home was repeatedly dawn-raided by gangs of police officers. โŒ Both local and national newspapers published lies about me to try and smear me. โŒ Senior prosecutors in the CPS even fabricated charges desperate to silence our demands for justice. I spent 3 years on bail as case after case against me collapsed in court. My mother died before I was able to clear my name. Now the truth is out. In detail. The Pakistani Rape Gangs are real. And their victims, little White girls, number in the hundreds of thousands. I am Raja Miah. For six years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. So now the question is: will you stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash? This isnโ€™t just about justice for the past. Itโ€™s about stopping it from ever happening again. If we act together, we can hold every complicit official to account. We can tear down the system that protected them. And yes, if we push far enough, this government could fall and politicians will go to prison. If thereโ€™s even a one-in-a-million chance of achieving that, wouldnโ€™t you take ten seconds to back the campaign that forced this inquiry into existence? ๐Ÿ”ด Subscribe to my newsletter โ€“ itโ€™s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (ยฃ3/month or ยฃ30/year): ๐Ÿ‘‰ This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. ๐Ÿ”ด Prefer a one-off contribution? ๐Ÿ‘‰ ๐Ÿ‘‰ No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know whatโ€™s at stake. Weโ€™ve come this far. Help finish it. Without your support, they will win. ๐Ÿ‘‰ - Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

47,851 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ”ฌ Can AI actually do science end-to-end? ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ“ˆ And how would we know when it matches, or surpasses, humans? โšก๐Ÿงช AI is rapidly automating scientific discovery, but benchmarking full-cycle discovery, from ๐Ÿ’ก ideation โ†’ ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ป execution โ†’ ๐Ÿ“Š conclusions, remains unsolved: ๐Ÿง๐Ÿง๐Ÿง โŒ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Open-ended discovery โ†’ manual validation (costly, unscalable) โŒ๐Ÿ“ Metric-driven benchmarks (e.g., MLE-Bench) โ†’ convenient but narrow (is higher accuracy really enough?) โŒ๐Ÿค–โš–๏ธ LLM-as-judge โ†’ useful, but fundamentally risky if used alone ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿš€ Introducing FIRE-Bench๐Ÿ”ฅ: Fullcycle Insight Rediscovery Evaluation ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸŒ ๐Ÿ“šโœจ A benchmark that turns fresh, human-verified insights from recent ๐Ÿ† NeurIPS / ICLR / ICML papers into masked, end-to-end discovery challenges ๐Ÿงฉ ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ” Constrained open-ended discoveryโ€“backed by ground truth. ๐Ÿ“Œ Key takeaways: 1โƒฃ ๐Ÿ“–๐Ÿงฑ Reference-based evaluation still matters: constrained LLM judging helps, but human-grounded references remain essential until agents can consistently match human conclusions 2โƒฃ ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿง  Expert-validated ground truth: all tasks come from recent NeurIPS / ICLR / ICML papers, with contamination carefully controlled 3โƒฃ ๐Ÿ”๐ŸŽญ Rediscovery, not reproduction: original ๐Ÿงช methods, ๐Ÿ“Š experiments, ๐Ÿ’ป implementations, and ๐Ÿ“ˆ analyses are fully masked to create real discovery challenges ๐Ÿ”‘ Key empirical findings: ๐Ÿ’ก The "Science Gap" is Real: Even the best setup (Claude Code + Sonnet-4) caps out at an F1 score of 46.7. On hard tasks, agents struggle to break 30 ๐Ÿ’ก Success is a "Lottery": Performance has incredibly high variance. Reliability is a major unsolved issue. ๐Ÿ’ก Coding is no longer the bottleneck; high-level reasoning and analysis are: ~74% of errors stem from flawed planning, not coding โš™๏ธ How it works: ๐Ÿ”น Research-Problem Trees: We parse papers into trees (from broad roots to concrete leaves). This allows us to select intermediate nodes that perfectly balance open-ended exploration with verifiable ground truth. ๐Ÿ”น Claim-Level Evaluation: We match AI conclusions against human conclusions using granular claim decomposition (F1 score). ๐Ÿ”น Creativity Check: We score false positives to see if agents are finding novel truths (Spoiler๐Ÿšจ: they arenโ€™t creative yet). ๐Ÿ”น New Diagnostic Taxonomy: failures traced across four stages: ๐Ÿง  Planning โ†’ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Implementation โ†’ โ–ถ๏ธ Execution โ†’ ๐Ÿงพ Conclusion ๐Ÿ”น Additional Analyses: cost efficiency, contamination checks, and more. ๐Ÿ‘€ The Future: ๐Ÿš€ Live-FIRE-Bench: a live, continuously updated FIRE-Bench to track real-time progress on the latest research (Newest LLMs should be benchmarked with the newest research) ๐Ÿš€ Stronger scaffolding (search + planning + coding) ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿงฐ and converting FIRE-Bench into interactive environments for training research agents ๐Ÿš€ Toward real creativity: We want better systems that can produce genuinely novel conclusions toward creativity ๐ŸŽจโณ ๐Ÿš€ Better systems ๐Ÿง โœจ and better benchmarks ๐Ÿ“ must co-evolve ๐Ÿ”„ over time ๐Ÿ“œ๐ŸŽฅ Paper, video, demo, and research trees: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸŒ #AI ๐Ÿค– #MachineLearning ๐Ÿ“š #AI4Science ๐Ÿ”ฌ #LLMs ๐Ÿง  #Research ๐Ÿงช #AgenticAI ๐Ÿš€ #FireBench ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Zhen Wang

13,450 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 5 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Talking about #TicketToHeaven #GMMTVLiveHouse #LOLFanFest2026 #GeminiFourth #เน€เธˆเธกเธตเน„เธ™เธ™เนŒเน‚เธŸเธฃเนŒเธ— 4๏ธโƒฃ: today we still havent gone on stage yet, but weโ€™re about to go perform and sing Ticket To Heavenโ€™s OST series for everyone to listen to. weโ€™re excited too. and its the first live singing performance after it was released ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿค ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ: there are also Ticket To Heavenโ€™s first EP 4๏ธโƒฃ: yes yes!! it was sold at LOLโ€™s day two, right? โ™Š๏ธ: yes 4๏ธโƒฃ: as soon as the ticket sales opened it got sold out. thank you so much to all the fans. weโ€™re really happy that everyone gave such a great respons โ™Š๏ธ: lets watch it together. on this 30th come watch together. this is our first ever first EP. weโ€™ve never done a first EP before... so this is it. everyone will probably get to listen to our duet song in this OST this time. and lets watch it together and see how it turns out bc weโ€™re also excited and nervous about how the story will come out. weโ€™re excited too. please support every episode of Ticket to Heaven. please support us๐Ÿค 4๏ธโƒฃ: please support GeminiFourth too kub mommy kub.. please support us too ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป

๐—š๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐— ๐˜† ๐—™๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐ŸŒป

11,944 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

LYKN RISE AT DUSK #LYKNDuskAndDawnConcertD1 #hongshihoshi hong ending ment ๐Ÿ’Œ ๐Ÿฆ: as artists like us, thereโ€™s probably not much we can give you besides happiness and memories from a certain period of your life. no matter how many years weโ€™ll be around, or how many years youโ€™ll be with us, i just hope that this becomes one of those good times , a time you can look back on and think, โ€œdamn, it was so awesome following lykn. it was amazing watching them sing and dance with all their heart.โ€ i kind of hope that someday, youโ€™ll tell your grandchild, like, โ€œback in my day, i used to listen to lykn, they were so cool, kid. they even had a concert at impact arena, and i went to see it. it was spectacular.โ€ people like the five of usโ€ฆthis is probably all we can give you. weโ€™ll be here as long as everyone still remembers our names. if one day, no one in the world remembers us anymore, thatโ€™s fine too. maybe our names will still be in some book, you know? like in history, and if it ever gets to that point, that just means we were really damn awesome, right? i might sound all emotional, but honestly, before coming to this concert, i cried so much. it was such a stressful concert, i have to say, this venue is huge. i was so nervous when i came for the first blocking rehearsal here. you can really feel the weight of the word โ€œimpactโ€ itโ€™s massive. and looking back, i think everyone whoโ€™s ever performed here probably felt the same. because when we were practicing in the rehearsal room, it was way easier than being here, this stage is huge, we have to run everywhere. but the best part is that no matter where i look, i see all of you smiling, screaming, singing along with us. thank you so, so much for choosing to come and watch the lykn concert today, and tomorrow too. weโ€™re so, so, so happy to the point where itโ€™s hard to even put into words. so all we can do is express it through our performance. we gave it our everything, and weโ€™re so grateful that you came to see us today. we love you all so much, and weโ€™re really really happy to have met you, whether youโ€™re here or watching from home. i hope weโ€™ll remember each other for a long, long time. because when iโ€™m 80, iโ€™ll probably still be talking about this.

sha ๐Ÿ“

32,975 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

๐ŸšจJOHNNY'S LOCKER" IS EMPTY: The Charity Fraud That Proves Erika Kirk Is A Pathological Liar โ€”How Erika Kirk Used a Tech Bro to Fake a "Dying Hero" for Donations ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ˜ค We thought weโ€™d seen it all, but this is a new low. Erika Kirk has been raising money for her charity offshoot, "Johnny's Locker," claiming it was inspired by the courage of a young "survivor" and "hero" named Johnny Bryan. She has solicited donations based on this young man's story of "steadfast faith," even featuring photos of him in her promotional videos. BUT WE FOUND HIM. AND ITโ€™S ALL A LIE. After a deep dive investigation using facial recognition and reverse image searches, we have discovered that "Johnny Bryan" DOES NOT EXIST. THE RECEIPT BREAKDOWN: ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡ 1. THE FAKE PHOTOS (THE CATFISH): The man in Erikaโ€™s charity photos is NOT a childhood cancer survivor named Johnny Bryan. He is Jon Erik Hernandez, a Stanford University alum and development operations professional working in Silicon Valley. The Evidence: We matched the photos from her charity video directly to Jon Erik Hernandezโ€™s LinkedIn profile. The Question: Did Erika hire an actor? Did she rope a friend into her scam to pose for these pictures? Or did she just steal a stranger's face to sell a sob story? 2. THE STOLEN NAME: So, where did the name "Johnny Bryan" come from? Erikaโ€™s family has deep ties to Chicago. Our digging found a real John Frederick "Johnny" Bryanโ€”a former NFL player for the Chicago Bears and Cardinals who died in 1966. It appears Erika stole the name of a deceased Chicago sports figure, attached it to a fake backstory, and slapped Jon Erik Hernandezโ€™s face on it to create a "hero" for her charity. THE CONCLUSION: The entire premise of "Johnny's Locker" appears to be a fraud built on false pretenses. โŒ Fake Name. โŒ Fake Backstory. โŒ Stolen Photos. If she will lie about a charity for children in hospitals, what won't she lie about? Everything about her life is a performance. This isn't charity; it's a scam. Shoutout to the amazing MIA who helped me with this story. FOLLOW Her! Tag Candace Owens and RT to EXPOSE this Fraud!๐Ÿ“ข๐Ÿ‘‡

Project Constitution

73,492 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 5 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰