Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

REALITY CHECK 5: DIGONG CANNOT BE EXTRADITED BACK Former SC Justice Antonio Carpio clarifies some of the DDS' confusion. Was there a violation of the Rome Statute when Digong was arrested by the ICC without going through a Philippine court? No. Article 59 of the Rome Statute does require... that Digong's arrest should have gone through a domestic court if the Philippines was still a State Party. Since our withdrawal from the ICC, this no longer applies. This alleged misstep in Digong's apprehension no longer exists because of his own doing. Was Digong illegally surrendered to the Interpol? No. Section 17 of RA 9851 states that, "in the interest of justice, the relevant Philippine authorities may dispense with the investigation or prosecution of a crime punishable under this Act if another court or international tribunal is already conducting the investigation or undertaking the prosecution of such crime. Instead, the authorities may surrender or extradite suspected or accused persons in the Philippines to the appropriate international court, if any, or to another State pursuant to the applicable extradition laws and treaties." Can the Supreme Court of the Philippines compel the ICC to return Digong? No. Even if Digong was served an ICC warrant without a counterpart warrant from a Philippine court, the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over the ICC nor the Netherlands to compel them to surrender Digong. Can Digong's legal team argue that he was kidnapped and unlawfully surrendered to the ICC? Yes. But it won't bring back Digong to the Philippines. The ICC follows a doctrine or rule that disregards the manner by which a suspect is surrendered to their jurisdiction even if this be by kidnapping. It doesn't matter to the ICC since they didn't commit the abduction. They merely received a suspect surrendered by a State. The sound of DDS anguish continues to grow louder. (Video credits to DZME Radyo TV)show more

The Cocky Rocky, a ᜉᜒᜎᜒᜉᜒᜈᜓ

8,503 subscribers

205,898 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Образование Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля Mister Baiter

Mister Baiter1 год назад

Male captus bene detentus

Фото профиля Gio Salvador

Gio Salvador1 год назад

pasok Sass sa Rome eme eme

Фото профиля Just Me

Just Me1 год назад

Pero maiintindihan din kaya nila ito?

Фото профиля Michael

Michael1 год назад

Carpio is a corporate lawyer. He is not competent to talk about the ICC rules. He does not have the experience and knowledge. This is his opinion. Carpio's mettle as a lawyer has not been seen. He filed a case in the SC but did not argue it.

Фото профиля Erwin B

Erwin B1 год назад

O tinagalog na ni Justice Carpio mga kababayan. Baka naman kailangan pang inglisin😏🤦🏻

Фото профиля The Liberation Project

The Liberation Project1 год назад

𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝟏𝟎 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐒 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘰. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Фото профиля ;

;1 год назад

Kahit maglupasay pa mga dds??

Похожие видео

WATCH: Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Adolfo Azcuna believes there was a violation in turning over former President Duterte to the International Criminal Court (ICC). “There was a violation in the act of surrender,” Azcuna says, noting that the Rome Statute requires the arrested person to be brought before a local court. However, Azcuna points out that the ICC adheres to the “Male captus bene detentus” principle, which means that “even if the arrest is illegal, the detention can still be legal” based on the gravity of offense. A member of the Constitutional Commission that drafted the 1987 Constitution, Azcuna says there are pending petitions before the Supreme Court. “There was a violation, and there will be consequences for that violation” | Eimor Santos

WATCH: Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Adolfo Azcuna believes there was a violation in turning over former President Duterte to the International Criminal Court (ICC). “There was a violation in the act of surrender,” Azcuna says, noting that the Rome Statute requires the arrested person to be brought before a local court. However, Azcuna points out that the ICC adheres to the “Male captus bene detentus” principle, which means that “even if the arrest is illegal, the detention can still be legal” based on the gravity of offense. A member of the Constitutional Commission that drafted the 1987 Constitution, Azcuna says there are pending petitions before the Supreme Court. “There was a violation, and there will be consequences for that violation” | Eimor Santos

NewsWatch Plus PH

47,509 просмотров • 1 год назад

Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "The Americans, Israelis and Britain are saying the International Criminal Court does not have jurisdiction. How do they have jurisdiction when Israel isn't a signatory and Palestine isn't a state?" Toby Cadman, "The report declare that Palestine is a state for the purpose of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court.. The attacks in Gaza is part of an international armed conflict" KGM, "Does this mean that if an arrest warrant is granted, any country that is a signatory to the ICC would have an obligation arrest Netanyahu if he sets foot in their country?" Toby Cadman, "Yes"

Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "The Americans, Israelis and Britain are saying the International Criminal Court does not have jurisdiction. How do they have jurisdiction when Israel isn't a signatory and Palestine isn't a state?" Toby Cadman, "The report declare that Palestine is a state for the purpose of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court.. The attacks in Gaza is part of an international armed conflict" KGM, "Does this mean that if an arrest warrant is granted, any country that is a signatory to the ICC would have an obligation arrest Netanyahu if he sets foot in their country?" Toby Cadman, "Yes"

Farrukh

602,090 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This is NOT how an ICC suspect and fugitive from international justice should be received in a State Party to the Int'l Criminal Court. By failing to arrest #Putin, #Mongolia is violating the Rome Statute and its own legislation. Rule of law is in trouble in 🇲🇳.

This is NOT how an ICC suspect and fugitive from international justice should be received in a State Party to the Int'l Criminal Court. By failing to arrest #Putin, #Mongolia is violating the Rome Statute and its own legislation. Rule of law is in trouble in 🇲🇳.

Sergey Vasiliev

165,658 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Sharing my live broadcast media interview with Russia Today (RT) late last night. The interview focused on former President Rodrigo Duterte and the unfolding events in the Philippines, which have garnered significant media attention both domestically and internationally. Duterte has been arrested and transferred to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague to face charges of crimes against humanity related to the anti-drug campaign during his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Duterte was apprehended in Manila on March 11, 2025, upon returning from Hong Kong from a family vacation. His arrest followed a 12-hour standoff at the Manila Villamor air base. He was subsequently transported to The Hague, arriving at Rotterdam Airport on March 12, 2025. Note that the ICC has no jurisdiction over the conduct of the Philippines after its withdrawal from the Rome Statute. Under Article 127, paragraph 1, of the Rome Statute, a State may withdraw from the Statute by notification in writing to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, which will take effect one year after the date of notification. The Philippines officially initiated the process of withdrawal on March 17, 2018, and the withdrawal took effect on March 17, 2019, making the withdrawal legal and effective. According to Article 127, paragraph 2, of the Rome Statute, even if a State withdraws from the Statute, its withdrawal does not exempt it from legal obligations undertaken during the State's time as a State party or from investigative proceedings that have been initiated. However, the withdrawing State is not obliged to assist in cases initiated or advanced by the ICC after withdrawal, including the obligation to cooperate in connection with the submission of the accused (Article 86). This means that the Philippines no longer has a legal obligation to assist in the extradition of Duterte or other defendants after withdrawal. To Watch click the video. Thank you!

Sharing my live broadcast media interview with Russia Today (RT) late last night. The interview focused on former President Rodrigo Duterte and the unfolding events in the Philippines, which have garnered significant media attention both domestically and internationally. Duterte has been arrested and transferred to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague to face charges of crimes against humanity related to the anti-drug campaign during his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Duterte was apprehended in Manila on March 11, 2025, upon returning from Hong Kong from a family vacation. His arrest followed a 12-hour standoff at the Manila Villamor air base. He was subsequently transported to The Hague, arriving at Rotterdam Airport on March 12, 2025. Note that the ICC has no jurisdiction over the conduct of the Philippines after its withdrawal from the Rome Statute. Under Article 127, paragraph 1, of the Rome Statute, a State may withdraw from the Statute by notification in writing to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, which will take effect one year after the date of notification. The Philippines officially initiated the process of withdrawal on March 17, 2018, and the withdrawal took effect on March 17, 2019, making the withdrawal legal and effective. According to Article 127, paragraph 2, of the Rome Statute, even if a State withdraws from the Statute, its withdrawal does not exempt it from legal obligations undertaken during the State's time as a State party or from investigative proceedings that have been initiated. However, the withdrawing State is not obliged to assist in cases initiated or advanced by the ICC after withdrawal, including the obligation to cooperate in connection with the submission of the accused (Article 86). This means that the Philippines no longer has a legal obligation to assist in the extradition of Duterte or other defendants after withdrawal. To Watch click the video. Thank you!

Anna Malindog-Uy

27,509 просмотров • 1 год назад

Complete and utter lies and bullshit from start to finish. I can't believe Rubio would destroy his own reputation like this. The ICC has no jurisdiction in the United States or over US citizens. The United States is not a state party to the Rome Statute, which founded the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002. The sole reason the Trump regime is going after the ICC is to try and protect Netanyahu. The ICC has issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, allegeding that he is responsible for the war crimes of starvation as a method of warfare and of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024. American citizens have nothing to fear from the ICC...

Complete and utter lies and bullshit from start to finish. I can't believe Rubio would destroy his own reputation like this. The ICC has no jurisdiction in the United States or over US citizens. The United States is not a state party to the Rome Statute, which founded the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002. The sole reason the Trump regime is going after the ICC is to try and protect Netanyahu. The ICC has issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, allegeding that he is responsible for the war crimes of starvation as a method of warfare and of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024. American citizens have nothing to fear from the ICC...

Kerry Burgess

19,423 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“LOCAL JUDGE OR FOREIGN JUDGE?” In #ABOGADO, the debate centers on whether an arrest warrant must be issued only by a Philippine court or if a foreign court like the ICC is covered. Atty. Mel Sta. Maria says the Constitution does not distinguish between a local or foreign judge, and points to Republic Act 9851 as recognition of international mechanisms in crimes against humanity cases. Atty. Paolo Panelo disagrees, saying judicial power is vested only in Philippine courts, and the ICC is not part of that system. The issue highlights the clash between constitutional law and international law. FULL DISCUSSION:

“LOCAL JUDGE OR FOREIGN JUDGE?” In #ABOGADO, the debate centers on whether an arrest warrant must be issued only by a Philippine court or if a foreign court like the ICC is covered. Atty. Mel Sta. Maria says the Constitution does not distinguish between a local or foreign judge, and points to Republic Act 9851 as recognition of international mechanisms in crimes against humanity cases. Atty. Paolo Panelo disagrees, saying judicial power is vested only in Philippine courts, and the ICC is not part of that system. The issue highlights the clash between constitutional law and international law. FULL DISCUSSION:

Bilyonaryo News Channel

14,155 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

What do ICC arrest warrants mean for Netanyahu & Gallant? ’If Netanyahu or Gallant enter into a Rome statute state's jurisdiction, they have to be arrested and transferred to the ICC for prosecution, a monumental issue,’ Tayab Ali, director of the ICJP, tells MEE

What do ICC arrest warrants mean for Netanyahu & Gallant? ’If Netanyahu or Gallant enter into a Rome statute state's jurisdiction, they have to be arrested and transferred to the ICC for prosecution, a monumental issue,’ Tayab Ali, director of the ICJP, tells MEE

Middle East Eye

27,393 просмотров • 1 год назад

Secretary of State Marco Rubio declares that the International Criminal Court has no power over America and their laws have no jurisdiction over anything we do, our military or anyone in America He says we were lied to about its creation and it’s been taken over by globalists who have installed their own people to gain nearly unlimited power and take away our sovereignty “Halfway across the world, there's an institution that calls itself the International Criminal Court. Maybe you've heard of it, maybe you haven't. But chances are you don't know the names of its judges, of its prosecutors, or its president. And you shouldn't have to. But as we speak, the ICC and its friends are waging a war against our country. Not with bullets or missiles. But with statutes and compacts and the force of so-called international law. When the ICC was born 24 years ago, they told us that it was merely a narrow backstop, a global court that would step in to prosecute only the gravest offenses — But the truth is, it was something far more radical and extreme. It was a global tribunal staffed by unelected globalist bureaucrats who claim their power is almost unlimited. The danger of this global court has only continued to grow. Today it threatens every aspect of our political and legal system. Border Patrol agents removing violent criminals from our country, American Marines risking their lives to defend our homeland, prosecutors working to dismantle terrorist plots to attack and kill Americans if we stand idle, all of them would be at the mercy of foreign judges, thousands of miles away, facing the constant risk of prosecution and even imprisonment for the so-called crime of defending their own country. The American people never agreed to any of this, and they never will. Read the words of our Declaration of Independence: We fought a revolution against a foreign power transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses. Independence is our birthright. We will never let foreign bureaucrats take that away from us. This administration will not sit by as the ICC and its allies seek to threaten our people. If they believe they can deprive us of our sovereignty, we will teach them the full meaning of American resolve” Here’s what the ICC and globalists don’t want you to know, the ICC has absolutely ZERO authority over the United States The ICC does not have jurisdiction over the United States or its nationals. The US is not a party to the Rome Statute, the treaty that created the ICC in 2002, never ratified it, and formally withdrew its signature in 2002 The ICC’s jurisdiction is primarily over nationals of member states or crimes committed on the territory of member states. Complementarity principle, it only acts when a country is unwilling or unable to prosecute The US and countries like China, India, Russia, Israel are not members. The US has passed laws like the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act that explicitly rejected ICC authority and authorizing measures to protect US personnel They have ZERO power over anything we do

Secretary of State Marco Rubio declares that the International Criminal Court has no power over America and their laws have no jurisdiction over anything we do, our military or anyone in America He says we were lied to about its creation and it’s been taken over by globalists who have installed their own people to gain nearly unlimited power and take away our sovereignty “Halfway across the world, there's an institution that calls itself the International Criminal Court. Maybe you've heard of it, maybe you haven't. But chances are you don't know the names of its judges, of its prosecutors, or its president. And you shouldn't have to. But as we speak, the ICC and its friends are waging a war against our country. Not with bullets or missiles. But with statutes and compacts and the force of so-called international law. When the ICC was born 24 years ago, they told us that it was merely a narrow backstop, a global court that would step in to prosecute only the gravest offenses — But the truth is, it was something far more radical and extreme. It was a global tribunal staffed by unelected globalist bureaucrats who claim their power is almost unlimited. The danger of this global court has only continued to grow. Today it threatens every aspect of our political and legal system. Border Patrol agents removing violent criminals from our country, American Marines risking their lives to defend our homeland, prosecutors working to dismantle terrorist plots to attack and kill Americans if we stand idle, all of them would be at the mercy of foreign judges, thousands of miles away, facing the constant risk of prosecution and even imprisonment for the so-called crime of defending their own country. The American people never agreed to any of this, and they never will. Read the words of our Declaration of Independence: We fought a revolution against a foreign power transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses. Independence is our birthright. We will never let foreign bureaucrats take that away from us. This administration will not sit by as the ICC and its allies seek to threaten our people. If they believe they can deprive us of our sovereignty, we will teach them the full meaning of American resolve” Here’s what the ICC and globalists don’t want you to know, the ICC has absolutely ZERO authority over the United States The ICC does not have jurisdiction over the United States or its nationals. The US is not a party to the Rome Statute, the treaty that created the ICC in 2002, never ratified it, and formally withdrew its signature in 2002 The ICC’s jurisdiction is primarily over nationals of member states or crimes committed on the territory of member states. Complementarity principle, it only acts when a country is unwilling or unable to prosecute The US and countries like China, India, Russia, Israel are not members. The US has passed laws like the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act that explicitly rejected ICC authority and authorizing measures to protect US personnel They have ZERO power over anything we do

Wall Street Apes

116,453 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

It is funny how the same people who repeatedly claim that their vote to archive the impeachment complaint of Sara Zimmerman Duterte was rooted from their respect for the Supreme Court are the same ones who cry foul when Rodrigo Roa Duterte was arrested. Congressman Zia Alonto Adiong pointed out that the Duterte bloc and the majority of Senators only respect the Supreme Court ruling only when it is convenient. When it favors their principal — Sara Zimmerman Duterte. The House of Representatives are merely exhausting all legal remedies to protect the power granted to them by the 1987 Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in Pangilinan et al vs. Cayetano et. all that the ICC has jurisdiction in supposed crimes committed before the Philippines from the ICC (G.R. No. 238875). It is important to note that the cases included in the Crimes Against Humanity case of Rodrigo Roa Duterte were within the time/ date we’re still a member of the International Criminal Court. Now that the Duterte Bloc and the majority of Senators said that they made their decision out of respect to the Supreme Court —- are they finally going to respect this too? Lols

It is funny how the same people who repeatedly claim that their vote to archive the impeachment complaint of Sara Zimmerman Duterte was rooted from their respect for the Supreme Court are the same ones who cry foul when Rodrigo Roa Duterte was arrested. Congressman Zia Alonto Adiong pointed out that the Duterte bloc and the majority of Senators only respect the Supreme Court ruling only when it is convenient. When it favors their principal — Sara Zimmerman Duterte. The House of Representatives are merely exhausting all legal remedies to protect the power granted to them by the 1987 Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in Pangilinan et al vs. Cayetano et. all that the ICC has jurisdiction in supposed crimes committed before the Philippines from the ICC (G.R. No. 238875). It is important to note that the cases included in the Crimes Against Humanity case of Rodrigo Roa Duterte were within the time/ date we’re still a member of the International Criminal Court. Now that the Duterte Bloc and the majority of Senators said that they made their decision out of respect to the Supreme Court —- are they finally going to respect this too? Lols

Just

41,847 просмотров • 1 год назад

The decision by the International Criminal Court to issue an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu is egregious, and aligns the ICC with Iran and its proxies. It’s another clear reminder of why the United States is not a member of the ICC. The US must continue to stand with our ally Israel.

The decision by the International Criminal Court to issue an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu is egregious, and aligns the ICC with Iran and its proxies. It’s another clear reminder of why the United States is not a member of the ICC. The US must continue to stand with our ally Israel.

Sen. James Lankford

11,065 просмотров • 1 год назад

No notice of warrant of arrest from the International Criminal Court (for former president Rodrigo Duterte), Department of Justice spokesperson Assistant Secretary Mico Clavano tells reporters on Monday (March 10, 2025). He said the Philippines is no longer a member of ICC, thus it may opt to forgo usual channels in implementing its orders, if any. | PNA video by Ben Pulta

No notice of warrant of arrest from the International Criminal Court (for former president Rodrigo Duterte), Department of Justice spokesperson Assistant Secretary Mico Clavano tells reporters on Monday (March 10, 2025). He said the Philippines is no longer a member of ICC, thus it may opt to forgo usual channels in implementing its orders, if any. | PNA video by Ben Pulta

Philippine News Agency

92,442 просмотров • 1 год назад

#BREAKING: Weissmann: “I want to make sure people understand what the federal government has said today in court, that when federal agents go to #Minneapolis, even if they commit a state crime, and not just any state crime, the state crime of MURDER, that the local police department has absolutely nothing to do about that, they have no jurisdiction…that is the statement of the Trump administration today in court. That CANNOT be the law…Final point, the statute of limitations on murder is FOREVER, and so this [#RenneGood & #AlexPretti] may be justice delayed, but it may not be justice denied.”😳

#BREAKING: Weissmann: “I want to make sure people understand what the federal government has said today in court, that when federal agents go to #Minneapolis, even if they commit a state crime, and not just any state crime, the state crime of MURDER, that the local police department has absolutely nothing to do about that, they have no jurisdiction…that is the statement of the Trump administration today in court. That CANNOT be the law…Final point, the statute of limitations on murder is FOREVER, and so this [#RenneGood & #AlexPretti] may be justice delayed, but it may not be justice denied.”😳

Emoluments Clause

481,396 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The New York City Mayor has called on the US federal government to arrest the Israeli Prime Minister. After reviewing “every possible avenue”, Mayor Zohran Mamdani said he acknowledged that the city did not have the “authority” to enforce an arrest warrant made on the Benjamin Netanyahu by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2024. “The federal government, however, does, and I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant,” he said. Israel responded to Mamdani's comments on Sunday in a post on X that called the ICC a 'kangaroo court' and said the arrest warrant against Netanyahu was bogus. President Donald Trump on Monday told Netanyahu in a social media post that he “will not be arrested, in any way, shape, or form, while in the United States of America.” It comes after Trump publicly denounced the ICC earlier this month. #News #Channel4News #Netanyahu #Mamdani #NewYorkCity

The New York City Mayor has called on the US federal government to arrest the Israeli Prime Minister. After reviewing “every possible avenue”, Mayor Zohran Mamdani said he acknowledged that the city did not have the “authority” to enforce an arrest warrant made on the Benjamin Netanyahu by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2024. “The federal government, however, does, and I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant,” he said. Israel responded to Mamdani's comments on Sunday in a post on X that called the ICC a 'kangaroo court' and said the arrest warrant against Netanyahu was bogus. President Donald Trump on Monday told Netanyahu in a social media post that he “will not be arrested, in any way, shape, or form, while in the United States of America.” It comes after Trump publicly denounced the ICC earlier this month. #News #Channel4News #Netanyahu #Mamdani #NewYorkCity

Channel 4 News

26,153 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

IMPEACHMENT COURT MAY SUBPOENA SARA/DIGONG JOINT ACCOUNT In a QuadComm hearing, Duterte dared to sign a bank secrecy waiver to counter Trillanes' allegations and hit back at him. Transparency is the only way to disprove Trillanes, but this seems impossible now that Duterte is detained at the ICC. However, don’t forget the co-owner of this bank account: Sara Duterte. With her trial nearing, the impeachment court can compel the AMLC to open its details.

IMPEACHMENT COURT MAY SUBPOENA SARA/DIGONG JOINT ACCOUNT In a QuadComm hearing, Duterte dared to sign a bank secrecy waiver to counter Trillanes' allegations and hit back at him. Transparency is the only way to disprove Trillanes, but this seems impossible now that Duterte is detained at the ICC. However, don’t forget the co-owner of this bank account: Sara Duterte. With her trial nearing, the impeachment court can compel the AMLC to open its details.

HAPPY PEPE

20,348 просмотров • 1 год назад

Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court was warned in May that if arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant were not withdrawn, he and the ICC would be “destroyed", Middle East Eye can exclusively reveal. The warning was delivered to Khan by Nicholas Kaufman, a British-Israeli defence lawyer at the court who told Khan he had spoken to Netanyahu’s legal advisor and, according to a note of the meeting lodged on file at the ICC and seen by Middle East Eye, was “authorised” to make him a proposal that would allow Khan to “climb down the tree”.

Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court was warned in May that if arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant were not withdrawn, he and the ICC would be “destroyed", Middle East Eye can exclusively reveal. The warning was delivered to Khan by Nicholas Kaufman, a British-Israeli defence lawyer at the court who told Khan he had spoken to Netanyahu’s legal advisor and, according to a note of the meeting lodged on file at the ICC and seen by Middle East Eye, was “authorised” to make him a proposal that would allow Khan to “climb down the tree”.

Middle East Eye

130,473 просмотров • 1 год назад

A LOOK AT THE ICC DETENTION CENTRE The ICC Detention Centre is located within a Dutch prison complex in Scheveningen - on the outskirts of The Hague in Netherlands. Detained persons have access to fresh air, recreational time and sports activities. They have access to library books, news and television. They can also cook for themselves. The detained person can also access computer facilities. They have one computer in their cell, which is linked to a specific computer at the Court, and only their defense will have access. The defense can upload case-related material which the detained person can access and make comments on. The detained person can be visited by a consular or diplomatic representative of his/her country, and is entitled to privileged communication with them. He can also be visited by a minister or spiritual advisor, or by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Detained persons are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Former Philippine President is on his way to the Hague in Netherlands due to an ICC arrest warrant issued upon “reasonable grounds” for crimes against humanity and murder. Source: International Criminal Court ONE News PH News5

A LOOK AT THE ICC DETENTION CENTRE The ICC Detention Centre is located within a Dutch prison complex in Scheveningen - on the outskirts of The Hague in Netherlands. Detained persons have access to fresh air, recreational time and sports activities. They have access to library books, news and television. They can also cook for themselves. The detained person can also access computer facilities. They have one computer in their cell, which is linked to a specific computer at the Court, and only their defense will have access. The defense can upload case-related material which the detained person can access and make comments on. The detained person can be visited by a consular or diplomatic representative of his/her country, and is entitled to privileged communication with them. He can also be visited by a minister or spiritual advisor, or by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Detained persons are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Former Philippine President is on his way to the Hague in Netherlands due to an ICC arrest warrant issued upon “reasonable grounds” for crimes against humanity and murder. Source: International Criminal Court ONE News PH News5

Gretchen Ho

409,637 просмотров • 1 год назад