Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Really cool - Tonight's Sun Devil WBB hoops game is also Breast Cancer Awareness Night. Each Sun Devil starter took the court with a breast cancer survivor during pregame. Gabby Elliott even had a personalized handshake with ASU women's golf coach Missy Farr-Kaye.

Jordan Hamm

6,775 subscribers

11,040 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Wow. What an emotional moment Tonight was breast cancer awareness night and it was a special night for Kenny Brooks as his wife is a cancer survivor He speaks about what tonight meant to him and his awesome interaction with the opposing coach UK has a good one in coach Brooks

Wow. What an emotional moment Tonight was breast cancer awareness night and it was a special night for Kenny Brooks as his wife is a cancer survivor He speaks about what tonight meant to him and his awesome interaction with the opposing coach UK has a good one in coach Brooks

Dylan Ballard

96,091 views • 1 year ago

Molly Miller is making program history with the Sun Devil WBB team as the first head coach with 21 wins in her debut season, and with a starting lineup of all transfer portal players 🙌

Molly Miller is making program history with the Sun Devil WBB team as the first head coach with 21 wins in her debut season, and with a starting lineup of all transfer portal players 🙌

SportsCenter

914,679 views • 5 months ago

ASU has already sold more women's basketball season tickets than the past two seasons combined. Molly Miller has brought palpable energy to the program and is ready to put Sun Devil WBB back on the map: "We want to compete for a conference championship." Coach Molly Miller

ASU has already sold more women's basketball season tickets than the past two seasons combined. Molly Miller has brought palpable energy to the program and is ready to put Sun Devil WBB back on the map: "We want to compete for a conference championship." Coach Molly Miller

Blake Niemann

55,354 views • 1 year ago

FETTERMAN CONFRONTED: “I’m a breast cancer survivor, I had a double mastectomy, and the Trump administration took my health care away… And you’re standing with him.” Fetterman can barely talk. Painful to watch as usual.

FETTERMAN CONFRONTED: “I’m a breast cancer survivor, I had a double mastectomy, and the Trump administration took my health care away… And you’re standing with him.” Fetterman can barely talk. Painful to watch as usual.

The Tennessee Holler

613,163 views • 2 months ago

First, they scammed you on skin cancer when the sun is good for you. Now, they're scamming you again with mammograms. It turns out that this diagnostic procedure exposes women's breasts to a type of radiation that's known to CAUSE cancer. Here's the worst part. We now know that over the past 30 years, 1.3 million women have been misdiagnosed with breast cancer that actually had no chance of causing harm. So, they were put on the treadmill, generating huge profits for Big Pharma and hospitals while being deceived into believing that the medical system had "saved" them from cancer—all while draining their wallets. Sayer Ji calls it “like a Stockholm syndrome.” “Millions of people march in these breast cancer awareness marches, not realizing that it's funded by the very corporations that make money off the drugs used to treat breast cancer.” Uncover more truths about cancer in the comment below 👇

First, they scammed you on skin cancer when the sun is good for you. Now, they're scamming you again with mammograms. It turns out that this diagnostic procedure exposes women's breasts to a type of radiation that's known to CAUSE cancer. Here's the worst part. We now know that over the past 30 years, 1.3 million women have been misdiagnosed with breast cancer that actually had no chance of causing harm. So, they were put on the treadmill, generating huge profits for Big Pharma and hospitals while being deceived into believing that the medical system had "saved" them from cancer—all while draining their wallets. Sayer Ji calls it “like a Stockholm syndrome.” “Millions of people march in these breast cancer awareness marches, not realizing that it's funded by the very corporations that make money off the drugs used to treat breast cancer.” Uncover more truths about cancer in the comment below 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,775,603 views • 1 year ago

For one night, the Congressional Women's Softball Game sets aside partisan politics for a greater cause. The game between the women of Congress and members of the press raises money for the Young Survival Coalition, which helps young adults with breast cancer.

For one night, the Congressional Women's Softball Game sets aside partisan politics for a greater cause. The game between the women of Congress and members of the press raises money for the Young Survival Coalition, which helps young adults with breast cancer.

CBS Evening News

24,216 views • 1 year ago

This needs immediate attention American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients “There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction. So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction." That all changes “The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing. They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients” The bill limits coverage to those with a formal breast cancer diagnosis (excluding high-risk preventive cases like BRCA1/2 mutations) and tying reimbursements to outdated CPT codes instead of modern ones (like S codes for muscle-sparing reconstructions).

This needs immediate attention American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients “There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction. So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction." That all changes “The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing. They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients” The bill limits coverage to those with a formal breast cancer diagnosis (excluding high-risk preventive cases like BRCA1/2 mutations) and tying reimbursements to outdated CPT codes instead of modern ones (like S codes for muscle-sparing reconstructions).

Wall Street Apes

77,473 views • 8 months ago

Arizona State is now 15-0 on the season after beating Utah 69-68! McKinna Brackens finished with a career-high 31 points and 2 game-winning free throws! Sun Devil WBB has now tied the school record for consecutive wins at 15.

Arizona State is now 15-0 on the season after beating Utah 69-68! McKinna Brackens finished with a career-high 31 points and 2 game-winning free throws! Sun Devil WBB has now tied the school record for consecutive wins at 15.

Rachel Galligan

19,412 views • 6 months ago

Deltra James was 33 when she was told she likely had a 12 percent chance of living five more years following her metastatic breast #cancer diagnosis. But on a gloomy Friday this past August, she danced the night away with friends and family during her five-year #cancerversary:

Deltra James was 33 when she was told she likely had a 12 percent chance of living five more years following her metastatic breast #cancer diagnosis. But on a gloomy Friday this past August, she danced the night away with friends and family during her five-year #cancerversary:

Drea Cornejo

57,482 views • 1 year ago

Five years ago, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. As a man, that’s something you never expect to hear. I chose to have my treatment in China, and today I’m thankfully cancer free. In this video, I return for my regular follow-up at one of China’s leading cancer hospitals. From advanced diagnostics to proton therapy, I take you behind the scenes to see how modern technology is helping doctors detect cancer earlier and give patients the best possible care. I also want to raise awareness of something many people still don’t realise… Men get breast cancer too. If sharing my story encourages even one person to get checked sooner, then making this video was worthwhile.

Five years ago, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. As a man, that’s something you never expect to hear. I chose to have my treatment in China, and today I’m thankfully cancer free. In this video, I return for my regular follow-up at one of China’s leading cancer hospitals. From advanced diagnostics to proton therapy, I take you behind the scenes to see how modern technology is helping doctors detect cancer earlier and give patients the best possible care. I also want to raise awareness of something many people still don’t realise… Men get breast cancer too. If sharing my story encourages even one person to get checked sooner, then making this video was worthwhile.

Barrett

35,380 views • 22 days ago

"The Sun, That Is Giving Life To All Of Us On This Earth, Is Not Here To Cause Cancer." Dr Stephanie Rimka "The Sun Isn't Causing Cancer-- It's What You're Doing Under It." "It's Like Saying Estrogen Causes Cancer. If That Were True, Every 15 Year Old Girl Would Have Breast Cancer." "Estrogen Does Not Cause Cancer. That's Another Lie." Cancer is not genetic, it is a metabolic disease. Cancer is an error in cellular metabolism, damaging crucial mitochondria & creating oxidative stress from an unhealthy diet of seed oils, sugar & processed foods, which are all harmful on a cellular level. The sun—the very source of life—isn't the problem. It’s what you’re doing under it that compromises your metabolic health: *⃣ Slathering on toxic sunscreens loaded with carcinogens, then baking them into your skin with UV light. *⃣ Eating processed junk foods full of rancid seed oils, sugars & artificial additives that fuel oxidative stress. *⃣ Drinking sugary drinks while lounging, adding to the toxic load. We’re constantly bombarded with cancer-causing substances: *⃣ Toxic carpets, vinyl flooring & furniture releasing harmful VOCs. *⃣ Body products & room freshening fragrances & candles filled with endocrine disruptors. *⃣ Ultra-processed foods engineered for profit, not health. The sun is an easy scapegoat. it’s not the sun that’s dangerous. It’s the toxins we’re exposing ourselves to everyday, that damage our metabolic function, making us vulnerable. Cancer is a metabolic disease & what we do under the sun matters more than the sun itself. 👇Melanoma Is Not Caused By Sunlight👇 👇Sunscreen Carcinogen Ingredients👇 👇Seed Oils: The Hateful 8👇 Speaker: Dr. Stephanie Joy Rimka Video: Wellness_Radar

"The Sun, That Is Giving Life To All Of Us On This Earth, Is Not Here To Cause Cancer." Dr Stephanie Rimka "The Sun Isn't Causing Cancer-- It's What You're Doing Under It." "It's Like Saying Estrogen Causes Cancer. If That Were True, Every 15 Year Old Girl Would Have Breast Cancer." "Estrogen Does Not Cause Cancer. That's Another Lie." Cancer is not genetic, it is a metabolic disease. Cancer is an error in cellular metabolism, damaging crucial mitochondria & creating oxidative stress from an unhealthy diet of seed oils, sugar & processed foods, which are all harmful on a cellular level. The sun—the very source of life—isn't the problem. It’s what you’re doing under it that compromises your metabolic health: ⃣ Slathering on toxic sunscreens loaded with carcinogens, then baking them into your skin with UV light. ⃣ Eating processed junk foods full of rancid seed oils, sugars & artificial additives that fuel oxidative stress. ⃣ Drinking sugary drinks while lounging, adding to the toxic load. We’re constantly bombarded with cancer-causing substances: ⃣ Toxic carpets, vinyl flooring & furniture releasing harmful VOCs. ⃣ Body products & room freshening fragrances & candles filled with endocrine disruptors. ⃣ Ultra-processed foods engineered for profit, not health. The sun is an easy scapegoat. it’s not the sun that’s dangerous. It’s the toxins we’re exposing ourselves to everyday, that damage our metabolic function, making us vulnerable. Cancer is a metabolic disease & what we do under the sun matters more than the sun itself. 👇Melanoma Is Not Caused By Sunlight👇 👇Sunscreen Carcinogen Ingredients👇 👇Seed Oils: The Hateful 8👇 Speaker: Dr. Stephanie Joy Rimka Video: Wellness_Radar

Valerie Anne Smith

305,392 views • 1 year ago

"The Sun, That Is Giving Life To All Of Us On This Earth, Is Not Here To Cause Cancer." Dr Stephanie Rimka "The Sun Isn't Causing Cancer-- It's What You're Doing Under It." "It's Like Saying Estrogen Causes Cancer. If That Were True, Every 15 Year Old Girl Would Have Breast Cancer." "Estrogen Does Not Cause Cancer. That's Another Lie." Cancer is not genetic, it is a metabolic disease. Cancer is an error in cellular metabolism, damaging crucial mitochondria & creating oxidative stress from an unhealthy diet of seed oils, sugar & processed foods, which are all harmful on a cellular level. The sun—the very source of life—isn't the problem. It’s what you’re doing under it that compromises your metabolic health: *⃣Slathering on toxic sunscreens loaded with carcinogens, then baking them into your skin with UV light. *⃣ Eating processed junk foods full of rancid seed oils, sugars & artificial additives that fuel oxidative stress. *⃣Drinking sugary drinks while lounging, adding to the toxic load. We’re constantly bombarded with cancer-causing substances: *⃣Toxic carpets, vinyl flooring & furniture releasing harmful VOCs. *⃣ Body products & room freshening fragrances & candles filled with endocrine disruptors. *⃣Ultra-processed foods engineered for profit, not health. The sun is an easy scapegoat. it’s not the sun that’s dangerous. It’s the toxins we’re exposing ourselves to everyday, that damage our metabolic function, making us vulnerable. Cancer is a metabolic disease & what we do under the sun matters more than the sun itself. 👇Melanoma Is Not Caused By Sunlight👇 👇Seed Oils: The Hateful 8👇 👇Sunscreen Carcinogen Ingredients👇 Speaker: Dr. Stephanie Joy Rimka Video: wellness_radar

"The Sun, That Is Giving Life To All Of Us On This Earth, Is Not Here To Cause Cancer." Dr Stephanie Rimka "The Sun Isn't Causing Cancer-- It's What You're Doing Under It." "It's Like Saying Estrogen Causes Cancer. If That Were True, Every 15 Year Old Girl Would Have Breast Cancer." "Estrogen Does Not Cause Cancer. That's Another Lie." Cancer is not genetic, it is a metabolic disease. Cancer is an error in cellular metabolism, damaging crucial mitochondria & creating oxidative stress from an unhealthy diet of seed oils, sugar & processed foods, which are all harmful on a cellular level. The sun—the very source of life—isn't the problem. It’s what you’re doing under it that compromises your metabolic health: ⃣Slathering on toxic sunscreens loaded with carcinogens, then baking them into your skin with UV light. ⃣ Eating processed junk foods full of rancid seed oils, sugars & artificial additives that fuel oxidative stress. ⃣Drinking sugary drinks while lounging, adding to the toxic load. We’re constantly bombarded with cancer-causing substances: ⃣Toxic carpets, vinyl flooring & furniture releasing harmful VOCs. ⃣ Body products & room freshening fragrances & candles filled with endocrine disruptors. ⃣Ultra-processed foods engineered for profit, not health. The sun is an easy scapegoat. it’s not the sun that’s dangerous. It’s the toxins we’re exposing ourselves to everyday, that damage our metabolic function, making us vulnerable. Cancer is a metabolic disease & what we do under the sun matters more than the sun itself. 👇Melanoma Is Not Caused By Sunlight👇 👇Seed Oils: The Hateful 8👇 👇Sunscreen Carcinogen Ingredients👇 Speaker: Dr. Stephanie Joy Rimka Video: wellness_radar

Valerie Anne Smith

365,904 views • 1 year ago

This is nothing short of a miracle. Dr John Campbell breaks down the study of an 83yr old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had metastasised to the liver, spine and bones. Usually a death sentence. She took a daily dose of 222mg of FenBen for 8 months. Which normalised her liver enzymes. The tumor marker dropped from 316 to 36. There was an absence of any abnormal metabolic activity indicative of cancer.

This is nothing short of a miracle. Dr John Campbell breaks down the study of an 83yr old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had metastasised to the liver, spine and bones. Usually a death sentence. She took a daily dose of 222mg of FenBen for 8 months. Which normalised her liver enzymes. The tumor marker dropped from 316 to 36. There was an absence of any abnormal metabolic activity indicative of cancer.

Kat A 🌸

1,057,340 views • 8 months ago

🚨 A HARVARD TRAINED MD JUST EXPLAINED WHY IVERMECTIN IS BEING STUDIED IN CANCER RESEARCH AGAIN And the internet is paying VERY close attention. Dr. Shintani says researchers have explored how Ivermectin may interact with cancer cells in laboratory and preclinical studies involving: • Breast cancer • Prostate cancer • Colon cancer • Lung cancer • Leukemia • Liver cancer • Stomach cancer Why scientists are interested: ✅ Studies suggest Ivermectin may trigger apoptosis, also known as programmed cancer cell death ✅ Researchers are investigating how it may affect tumor growth pathways and cancer stem-like cells ✅ Some preclinical studies are exploring Ivermectin alongside chemotherapy in laboratory models And THAT is why repurposed medicine conversations have exploded across podcasts, TikTok, X, and cancer forums worldwide. Not because the science is settled. Because people are shocked that a low-cost anti-parasitic drug is even being discussed in cancer research at all. But whether critics like it or not… The public conversation around repurposed drugs is getting impossible to ignore.

🚨 A HARVARD TRAINED MD JUST EXPLAINED WHY IVERMECTIN IS BEING STUDIED IN CANCER RESEARCH AGAIN And the internet is paying VERY close attention. Dr. Shintani says researchers have explored how Ivermectin may interact with cancer cells in laboratory and preclinical studies involving: • Breast cancer • Prostate cancer • Colon cancer • Lung cancer • Leukemia • Liver cancer • Stomach cancer Why scientists are interested: ✅ Studies suggest Ivermectin may trigger apoptosis, also known as programmed cancer cell death ✅ Researchers are investigating how it may affect tumor growth pathways and cancer stem-like cells ✅ Some preclinical studies are exploring Ivermectin alongside chemotherapy in laboratory models And THAT is why repurposed medicine conversations have exploded across podcasts, TikTok, X, and cancer forums worldwide. Not because the science is settled. Because people are shocked that a low-cost anti-parasitic drug is even being discussed in cancer research at all. But whether critics like it or not… The public conversation around repurposed drugs is getting impossible to ignore.

Joe Tippens

10,621 views • 1 month ago

This is nothing short of a miracle. Dr John Campbell breaks down the study of an 83yr old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had metastasised to the liver, spine and bones. Usually a death sentence. She took a daily dose of 222mg of FenBen for 8 months. Which normalised her liver enzymes. The tumor marker dropped from 316 to 36. There was an absence of any abnormal metabolic activity indicative of cancer. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Cancercure

This is nothing short of a miracle. Dr John Campbell breaks down the study of an 83yr old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had metastasised to the liver, spine and bones. Usually a death sentence. She took a daily dose of 222mg of FenBen for 8 months. Which normalised her liver enzymes. The tumor marker dropped from 316 to 36. There was an absence of any abnormal metabolic activity indicative of cancer. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Cancercure

Joe Tippens

513,757 views • 4 months ago

I met with a woman today with breast cancer who has been forced to make an impossible choice. She found a breast mass over a year ago but waited 10 months to get it diagnosed because she couldn’t afford insurance. She works 50 hours a week in the service industry, was denied Medicaid, and finally had her biopsy covered by Planned Parenthood. She’s now had a mastectomy and chemotherapy. But she still needs radiation and also wants breast reconstruction. But starting in January, her Affordable Care Act plan will jump from just over $100 to $500 a month due to The Big Beautiful Bill—something she simply cannot afford. Now she’s faced with a decision no patient should ever have to make: 👉 Does she use her remaining months of coverage for radiation and live with one breast? 👉 Or does she have breast reconstruction now and hope she can get insurance again later to cover the radiation? This is the reality of our system. A young woman, already carrying the weight of cancer, being forced to choose between treatments that should both be accessible. It’s unreal and it’s happening every day.

I met with a woman today with breast cancer who has been forced to make an impossible choice. She found a breast mass over a year ago but waited 10 months to get it diagnosed because she couldn’t afford insurance. She works 50 hours a week in the service industry, was denied Medicaid, and finally had her biopsy covered by Planned Parenthood. She’s now had a mastectomy and chemotherapy. But she still needs radiation and also wants breast reconstruction. But starting in January, her Affordable Care Act plan will jump from just over $100 to $500 a month due to The Big Beautiful Bill—something she simply cannot afford. Now she’s faced with a decision no patient should ever have to make: 👉 Does she use her remaining months of coverage for radiation and live with one breast? 👉 Or does she have breast reconstruction now and hope she can get insurance again later to cover the radiation? This is the reality of our system. A young woman, already carrying the weight of cancer, being forced to choose between treatments that should both be accessible. It’s unreal and it’s happening every day.

Elisabeth Potter MD

16,308 views • 11 months ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 views • 8 months ago

The Shocking Truth About Skin Cancer: What You’re Not Being Told About the Sun Is everything we’ve been told one big fat lie? The answer seems to be a resounding yes. While the public is constantly told to avoid the sun to prevent skin cancer, what they’re not telling you is that sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient for the human body. And get this: avoiding sunlight can double one’s risk of dying prematurely, and it also increases the risk of all other cancers. Sunlight also: • is critical for mental health • reduces the risk of breast cancer • is vital for cardiovascular health • increases one’s longevity • triggers the production of Vitamin D • is vital for proper immune system function So, why all the fearmongering? The answer seems to be “follow the money.” A Midwestern Doctor writes: “A remarkably sophisticated public relations campaign was launched to transform society for the benefit of [the dermatology] industry.” The demonization of the sun has “allowed the dermatologists to cast themselves as heroes and to stir up as much anxiety as possible about the sun—especially as a psychological investment they had to make constantly putting sunscreen on would make them more likely to go to their dermatologist.” Moreover, the skin cancer fear campaign has created “a massive sales funnel by being allowed to do a massive number of routine full body skin exams (on otherwise healthy individuals) and hence have a huge pool of potential cancers to biopsy or excise (remove).” Lastly, the war against sunlight has allowed them “to piggyback onto the fear the medical industry has marketed around cancer to justify charging a lot of money to do something questionable to prevent cancer and having every patient go along with it the second they hear the dreaded ‘c’ word.” So, there you have it. Now, you understand why they want you to fear the sun. Read the entirety of this masterful article by A Midwestern Doctor in the comment below.

The Shocking Truth About Skin Cancer: What You’re Not Being Told About the Sun Is everything we’ve been told one big fat lie? The answer seems to be a resounding yes. While the public is constantly told to avoid the sun to prevent skin cancer, what they’re not telling you is that sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient for the human body. And get this: avoiding sunlight can double one’s risk of dying prematurely, and it also increases the risk of all other cancers. Sunlight also: • is critical for mental health • reduces the risk of breast cancer • is vital for cardiovascular health • increases one’s longevity • triggers the production of Vitamin D • is vital for proper immune system function So, why all the fearmongering? The answer seems to be “follow the money.” A Midwestern Doctor writes: “A remarkably sophisticated public relations campaign was launched to transform society for the benefit of [the dermatology] industry.” The demonization of the sun has “allowed the dermatologists to cast themselves as heroes and to stir up as much anxiety as possible about the sun—especially as a psychological investment they had to make constantly putting sunscreen on would make them more likely to go to their dermatologist.” Moreover, the skin cancer fear campaign has created “a massive sales funnel by being allowed to do a massive number of routine full body skin exams (on otherwise healthy individuals) and hence have a huge pool of potential cancers to biopsy or excise (remove).” Lastly, the war against sunlight has allowed them “to piggyback onto the fear the medical industry has marketed around cancer to justify charging a lot of money to do something questionable to prevent cancer and having every patient go along with it the second they hear the dreaded ‘c’ word.” So, there you have it. Now, you understand why they want you to fear the sun. Read the entirety of this masterful article by A Midwestern Doctor in the comment below.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,240,233 views • 2 years ago