Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨Recent Development: Not only did former Axiom Senior BD Employee (Broox Bauer) BROOX abuse Axiom's internal tools to lookup wallet activity of users but has since moved on to a different project under a different alias. Meet Funding Predicts, a prop firm for prediction markets. If you're unfamiliar with...

tier1haterr's profile picture

T1H

12,862 subscribers

205,742 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The game was never rigged against you you were never even in the game. Somewhere between Jane Street's 10am dumps and ZachXBT investigation about Broox's internal dashboard If you're reading the news to make your trade, you ARE the trade. Look at what just happened with Axiom on Polymarket. predictorxyz joined Feb 2026 3 predictions total drops ~$66k on "Will Axiom be accused of insider trading?" at 13.8 cents. Walks away with $477k. A 625% return on a trade that only makes sense if you already know the answer. Meanwhile the Polymarket charts tell the whole story before anyone said a word. Meteora was sitting at 42.5%, Axiom at 17.6% then suddenly Axiom surges to 29.3% while Meteora bleeds down to 26%. The "prediction" market predicted it because someone inside the prediction already knew. This is the exact same architecture as Jane Street and IBIT. Jane Street sits on the pipe between Bitcoin ETFs and actual BTC, uses undisclosed derivatives to mask net exposure, then runs 10am sell programs into thin books. Broox sits on the pipe between Axiom's user data and the open market, uses internal dashboards to track whale wallets, then front-runs their positions. Different scale, identical logic - privileged access + information asymmetry + zero disclosure = free money. The only difference is the number of zeros. History doesn't even try to hide it anymore. Nathan Rothschild knew Napoleon lost at Waterloo before the London markets did - sold British bonds to cause panic, bought the bottom, built a dynasty. That was 1815 and we've learned absolutely nothing since. The game isn't rigged in some abstract conspiratorial way. It's rigged in a very specific, structural, boring-if-you-read-the-filings way.
0:31

The game was never rigged against you you were never even in the game. Somewhere between Jane Street's 10am dumps and ZachXBT investigation about Broox's internal dashboard If you're reading the news to make your trade, you ARE the trade. Look at what just happened with Axiom on Polymarket. predictorxyz joined Feb 2026 3 predictions total drops ~$66k on "Will Axiom be accused of insider trading?" at 13.8 cents. Walks away with $477k. A 625% return on a trade that only makes sense if you already know the answer. Meanwhile the Polymarket charts tell the whole story before anyone said a word. Meteora was sitting at 42.5%, Axiom at 17.6% then suddenly Axiom surges to 29.3% while Meteora bleeds down to 26%. The "prediction" market predicted it because someone inside the prediction already knew. This is the exact same architecture as Jane Street and IBIT. Jane Street sits on the pipe between Bitcoin ETFs and actual BTC, uses undisclosed derivatives to mask net exposure, then runs 10am sell programs into thin books. Broox sits on the pipe between Axiom's user data and the open market, uses internal dashboards to track whale wallets, then front-runs their positions. Different scale, identical logic - privileged access + information asymmetry + zero disclosure = free money. The only difference is the number of zeros. History doesn't even try to hide it anymore. Nathan Rothschild knew Napoleon lost at Waterloo before the London markets did - sold British bonds to cause panic, bought the bottom, built a dynasty. That was 1815 and we've learned absolutely nothing since. The game isn't rigged in some abstract conspiratorial way. It's rigged in a very specific, structural, boring-if-you-read-the-filings way.

gemchanger

53,215 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

There’s a truth prop firms don’t tell traders… And many traders don’t even realize it. Let me spill it. To get a $100K prop firm account, you usually pay $1,500 – $2,500. A $1M account can cost $5,000 – $20,000. But here’s the catch: Most prop firms offer 1:20 – 1:50 leverage Maybe 1:100 at best. Then they add: • Daily drawdown limits • Maximum drawdown rules • Strict risk parameters So what does that really mean? Even though it says $100K account, the usable risk capital is closer to ~$5K–$7K. That’s the real buying power you’re trading with. Now think about this: Most traders on a $100K funded account withdraw around $5K – $20K during payouts. But ask yourself honestly… Have you ever seen someone withdraw $100K from a $100K account? Rare. Now consider the time cost: • Phase 1 • Phase 2 • Sometimes Phase 3 During those stages you might make great profits — but it’s all on demo. You get nothing for it. Now imagine this instead: If you took that $2,500 challenge fee And traded your own capital with the same strategy… Could you scale it to $5K, $10K, even $20K in a few months? Many traders probably could. Another truth most people don’t talk about: Some prop firms copy trades from profitable traders on the backend and make multiples of what the trader earns. So they profit from: • Challenge fees • Failed accounts • And even your winning trades Which makes you wonder… Should traders actually be paying prop firms? Or should prop firms be looking for traders for free? Just something to think about. Not financial advice. Just my personal perspective as a trader.
1:28

There’s a truth prop firms don’t tell traders… And many traders don’t even realize it. Let me spill it. To get a $100K prop firm account, you usually pay $1,500 – $2,500. A $1M account can cost $5,000 – $20,000. But here’s the catch: Most prop firms offer 1:20 – 1:50 leverage Maybe 1:100 at best. Then they add: • Daily drawdown limits • Maximum drawdown rules • Strict risk parameters So what does that really mean? Even though it says $100K account, the usable risk capital is closer to ~$5K–$7K. That’s the real buying power you’re trading with. Now think about this: Most traders on a $100K funded account withdraw around $5K – $20K during payouts. But ask yourself honestly… Have you ever seen someone withdraw $100K from a $100K account? Rare. Now consider the time cost: • Phase 1 • Phase 2 • Sometimes Phase 3 During those stages you might make great profits — but it’s all on demo. You get nothing for it. Now imagine this instead: If you took that $2,500 challenge fee And traded your own capital with the same strategy… Could you scale it to $5K, $10K, even $20K in a few months? Many traders probably could. Another truth most people don’t talk about: Some prop firms copy trades from profitable traders on the backend and make multiples of what the trader earns. So they profit from: • Challenge fees • Failed accounts • And even your winning trades Which makes you wonder… Should traders actually be paying prop firms? Or should prop firms be looking for traders for free? Just something to think about. Not financial advice. Just my personal perspective as a trader.

Bonafide Brand

26,212 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Three BRAVE students at Barrington High School in Rhode Island stood up to their school board after their teacher celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk. The teacher, Benjamin Fillo, posted a disturbing rant to TikTok...openly supporting the assassination, calling Charlie a “piece of garbage,” and saying “this is what happens.” But the students REFUSED to stay silent. They appeared before the board, voiced their outrage, and called for Fillo’s immediate termination. One student said: “Charlie was not a racist, he did not hurt anyone sexually and he did not kill anyone, therefore this was an unjustified cause of death that should never be celebrated.” “Charlie’s children do not deserve to grow up without their father. Charlie’s wife did not deserve to lose her husband. Charlie did not deserve to lose his life because of a different opinion.” “But this teacher deserves to lose his job.” The school has placed Fillo on “administrative leave” while an independent investigation is conducted into his social media activity. These kids are heroes and Charlie would be proud!
0:33

Three BRAVE students at Barrington High School in Rhode Island stood up to their school board after their teacher celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk. The teacher, Benjamin Fillo, posted a disturbing rant to TikTok...openly supporting the assassination, calling Charlie a “piece of garbage,” and saying “this is what happens.” But the students REFUSED to stay silent. They appeared before the board, voiced their outrage, and called for Fillo’s immediate termination. One student said: “Charlie was not a racist, he did not hurt anyone sexually and he did not kill anyone, therefore this was an unjustified cause of death that should never be celebrated.” “Charlie’s children do not deserve to grow up without their father. Charlie’s wife did not deserve to lose her husband. Charlie did not deserve to lose his life because of a different opinion.” “But this teacher deserves to lose his job.” The school has placed Fillo on “administrative leave” while an independent investigation is conducted into his social media activity. These kids are heroes and Charlie would be proud!

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

119,222 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Notice which part of the Hardoi story nobody amplifying it wants to talk about. The inspection did not happen after a press conference. It happened after the complaint. The suspensions did not wait for an election cycle. They came the same week. And the action did not stop at the two teachers, it climbed upward to the officers whose job was to catch this earlier. Ask yourself when that last happened, and under whose government. For years the mid day meal story in this state was a story of complaints going nowhere. Files moved, nobody was suspended, the same kitchen served the same food the next morning. The scheme existed on paper and children ate whatever arrived. Today a video from a village school in Tadiyawan reaches the district magistrate and the state within hours, and people lose their jobs over it. Zero tolerance is not a slogan you print on a banner. It is what happens to the people responsible. Look at the record from this week and tell me it did not happen.
2:35

Notice which part of the Hardoi story nobody amplifying it wants to talk about. The inspection did not happen after a press conference. It happened after the complaint. The suspensions did not wait for an election cycle. They came the same week. And the action did not stop at the two teachers, it climbed upward to the officers whose job was to catch this earlier. Ask yourself when that last happened, and under whose government. For years the mid day meal story in this state was a story of complaints going nowhere. Files moved, nobody was suspended, the same kitchen served the same food the next morning. The scheme existed on paper and children ate whatever arrived. Today a video from a village school in Tadiyawan reaches the district magistrate and the state within hours, and people lose their jobs over it. Zero tolerance is not a slogan you print on a banner. It is what happens to the people responsible. Look at the record from this week and tell me it did not happen.

News Algebra

25,120 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

At some point Democrats just have to start being arrested “So Gavin Newsom and his wife actually created an organization just to steal some of the fire aid money. Like how this man is still governor of California and not behind bars is mind blowing So I'm sure most of you have heard about the fire aid controversy. You know, where they had this concert to raise $100 million for the victims of the Palisade fires. And people started asking, hey, where the did all that money go? Because there's not a single person who was a victim of the Palisade fires who's seen a cent of it. And through some investigative journalism, what we found is that they distributed the money in two rounds. - Now, the first round just went to just f*ckload of NGOs. Like some of them have nothing whatsoever to do with fire recovery - but they handed out $50 million apparently to all these corporations and nobody did a f*cking thing But then when we got to round two, this got even murkier because when you actually look at the names of who was given money under round two, you saw this little organization called Cal Volunteers Now that organization is no longer listed as a recipient on the website. Funny how once the story broke, they took their name off the website. I mean, that doesn't look guilty at all. But Cal Volunteers is an organization that was recently created by Gavin Newsome and his wife. And they have never done anything before this. This organization was created strictly for the purpose of getting fire aid money. And they've not said what they plan to do with the money they got. They haven't even said how much of the money they received? No. All they did when people noticed that Gavin Newsom's organization was getting money was take down their name and their organization from the website where the fire aid money went. So, like, not only did these fires happen because Gavin Newsom is a governor and doesn't know how to manage, not only was the response to these fires complete and total dog sh*t because Gavin Newsom's a horrible governor, but after his failures, he then created an organization just to siphon off money that they raised to take care of the people that he was supposed to take care of. This dude is a top tier criminal.”
2:03

At some point Democrats just have to start being arrested “So Gavin Newsom and his wife actually created an organization just to steal some of the fire aid money. Like how this man is still governor of California and not behind bars is mind blowing So I'm sure most of you have heard about the fire aid controversy. You know, where they had this concert to raise $100 million for the victims of the Palisade fires. And people started asking, hey, where the did all that money go? Because there's not a single person who was a victim of the Palisade fires who's seen a cent of it. And through some investigative journalism, what we found is that they distributed the money in two rounds. - Now, the first round just went to just f*ckload of NGOs. Like some of them have nothing whatsoever to do with fire recovery - but they handed out $50 million apparently to all these corporations and nobody did a f*cking thing But then when we got to round two, this got even murkier because when you actually look at the names of who was given money under round two, you saw this little organization called Cal Volunteers Now that organization is no longer listed as a recipient on the website. Funny how once the story broke, they took their name off the website. I mean, that doesn't look guilty at all. But Cal Volunteers is an organization that was recently created by Gavin Newsome and his wife. And they have never done anything before this. This organization was created strictly for the purpose of getting fire aid money. And they've not said what they plan to do with the money they got. They haven't even said how much of the money they received? No. All they did when people noticed that Gavin Newsom's organization was getting money was take down their name and their organization from the website where the fire aid money went. So, like, not only did these fires happen because Gavin Newsom is a governor and doesn't know how to manage, not only was the response to these fires complete and total dog sh*t because Gavin Newsom's a horrible governor, but after his failures, he then created an organization just to siphon off money that they raised to take care of the people that he was supposed to take care of. This dude is a top tier criminal.”

Wall Street Apes

482,637 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨A Stark Warning To The United States🚨 There is a generation of children currently being indoctrinated into MAGA, their parents drunk on the Trump regime, their children being brought up to believe that Trump is a new coming of Jesus. This generation will have an allegiance to the Trump regime like you have never witness, it will be a fanatical cult much worse than you have seen or can imagine. I have been saying for a while now, they have been grooming Barron for Presidency, slowly introducing the idea into their following that Barron will become a President of the United States. And now videos are starting to appear suggesting that it will be the case. To give you an idea, Trump administration Karoline Leavitt was just 17 when Trump flirted with the idea of being president, her parents pushing her into supporting and admiring Trump, now she is 28 years old, 40% of her life and all of her adult life she has been supporting Trump, and listen to the way she talks about him like he is a messiah. The above is nothing, these children of today, the next generation of the Trump regime have been brought up to think these people came from god to save their world, they would give their lives, everything to these people without a second thought. Some people grew up with pictures of Jesus on their walls, crucifixes, these people grew up with Trump on theirs, with Maga hats on their parents, some of their first words being Trump. If you thought that this cult was bad now, you have fucking idea about how crazy this is going to get. And trust me when I say this. Barron will be even worse than his dad emboldened by Americas inability to hold his father accountable for any of his crimes. Barron will bring on the end of America with the new age of fanatical Trumpism. He isn’t like you and me, he was brought up with a golden spoon in his ass, he will look at people like ants to be stamped on if he doesn’t get his way. This will not be good. At all.
0:30

🚨A Stark Warning To The United States🚨 There is a generation of children currently being indoctrinated into MAGA, their parents drunk on the Trump regime, their children being brought up to believe that Trump is a new coming of Jesus. This generation will have an allegiance to the Trump regime like you have never witness, it will be a fanatical cult much worse than you have seen or can imagine. I have been saying for a while now, they have been grooming Barron for Presidency, slowly introducing the idea into their following that Barron will become a President of the United States. And now videos are starting to appear suggesting that it will be the case. To give you an idea, Trump administration Karoline Leavitt was just 17 when Trump flirted with the idea of being president, her parents pushing her into supporting and admiring Trump, now she is 28 years old, 40% of her life and all of her adult life she has been supporting Trump, and listen to the way she talks about him like he is a messiah. The above is nothing, these children of today, the next generation of the Trump regime have been brought up to think these people came from god to save their world, they would give their lives, everything to these people without a second thought. Some people grew up with pictures of Jesus on their walls, crucifixes, these people grew up with Trump on theirs, with Maga hats on their parents, some of their first words being Trump. If you thought that this cult was bad now, you have fucking idea about how crazy this is going to get. And trust me when I say this. Barron will be even worse than his dad emboldened by Americas inability to hold his father accountable for any of his crimes. Barron will bring on the end of America with the new age of fanatical Trumpism. He isn’t like you and me, he was brought up with a golden spoon in his ass, he will look at people like ants to be stamped on if he doesn’t get his way. This will not be good. At all.

Bricktop_NAFO

1,075,890 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

The homeowner paid to have a new roof installed, the roofing company gave them a good deal on the price and got to work. When they finished ahead of schedule, the homeowner claimed they didn’t have the money for the roof so the roofers came back and put holes in the brand new roof, was this justified or is it vandalism? I would do the same since they didn’t pay a dime for materials. I used to help out with my friend’s landscaping business in the summer during college break. We arrived at some fancy house on a few acres. They mapped out what they wanted done and we did it. They even said we did a good job but still refused to pay because they claimed they didn’t like the shade of rocks we used even though they are the ones who picked them out. We even picked up the rocks for them at the business they wanted the rocks from. It took us about three days to do the work not to mention my friend paid for the materials up front expecting to be paid back when the customer paid us for the job so we went back and undid everything, my friend even cut down some of their bushes out of anger which was wrong on his part but can you blame him? I am willing to bet most people would do the same. They called the cops on us but the police said it was a civil matter but did tell us to leave and we did.
1:57

The homeowner paid to have a new roof installed, the roofing company gave them a good deal on the price and got to work. When they finished ahead of schedule, the homeowner claimed they didn’t have the money for the roof so the roofers came back and put holes in the brand new roof, was this justified or is it vandalism? I would do the same since they didn’t pay a dime for materials. I used to help out with my friend’s landscaping business in the summer during college break. We arrived at some fancy house on a few acres. They mapped out what they wanted done and we did it. They even said we did a good job but still refused to pay because they claimed they didn’t like the shade of rocks we used even though they are the ones who picked them out. We even picked up the rocks for them at the business they wanted the rocks from. It took us about three days to do the work not to mention my friend paid for the materials up front expecting to be paid back when the customer paid us for the job so we went back and undid everything, my friend even cut down some of their bushes out of anger which was wrong on his part but can you blame him? I am willing to bet most people would do the same. They called the cops on us but the police said it was a civil matter but did tell us to leave and we did.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

84,803 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Yesterday morning did not start out how this family was expecting it to at their ranch. They got an animal alert on their security camera and were surprised to see a dog hanging out by their gate. Their dogs were barking at him, so they put them inside and went back down to investigate. He was curled up in that corner of their fence for nearly an hour when they looked back at the camera footage. They could see he was a puppy and were hoping he'd just wandered from his home. They took him up to their dog ranch to see if they can reunite him with his family. They wait 7 days to see if they can find owners and then they put them up for adoption. I hope I’m wrong but he is about the right age for a Christmas puppy that has now gotten too big. 💔😢 I hate people but what a beautiful boy. ❤️
0:45

Yesterday morning did not start out how this family was expecting it to at their ranch. They got an animal alert on their security camera and were surprised to see a dog hanging out by their gate. Their dogs were barking at him, so they put them inside and went back down to investigate. He was curled up in that corner of their fence for nearly an hour when they looked back at the camera footage. They could see he was a puppy and were hoping he'd just wandered from his home. They took him up to their dog ranch to see if they can reunite him with his family. They wait 7 days to see if they can find owners and then they put them up for adoption. I hope I’m wrong but he is about the right age for a Christmas puppy that has now gotten too big. 💔😢 I hate people but what a beautiful boy. ❤️

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

254,993 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”
1:50

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”

The All-In Podcast

34,980 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

AFP has a crush on me. Well, I think it’s their “fact checker” Their team appears to be a person of 1. And Instagram’s whole “verified fact checkers”, relies on this single person, who I think is a left leaning, biased journalist that defends Liberal ideologies. In fact, the “fact checks” she’s done in the past, I would gladly debate her, ANY DAY, on any of these topics. They twist information, to suit their narratives. We literally all saw the video of the CBSA President being asked if refugees can use their phone, by-pass security checks, and the President said YES. So why the hell am I being fact checked when we all saw the video? If the misinformation is the CBSA President, fact check him for lying if that’s the case. Instead, they try to discredit those voices WHO DO NOT RECEIVE FUNDING FROM THE STATE & REPORT NEWS. And of course, this is a foreign, French, state-owned company. If the roles were reversed, and Russia was funding influencers to do this, there would be a criminal investigation!
6:54

AFP has a crush on me. Well, I think it’s their “fact checker” Their team appears to be a person of 1. And Instagram’s whole “verified fact checkers”, relies on this single person, who I think is a left leaning, biased journalist that defends Liberal ideologies. In fact, the “fact checks” she’s done in the past, I would gladly debate her, ANY DAY, on any of these topics. They twist information, to suit their narratives. We literally all saw the video of the CBSA President being asked if refugees can use their phone, by-pass security checks, and the President said YES. So why the hell am I being fact checked when we all saw the video? If the misinformation is the CBSA President, fact check him for lying if that’s the case. Instead, they try to discredit those voices WHO DO NOT RECEIVE FUNDING FROM THE STATE & REPORT NEWS. And of course, this is a foreign, French, state-owned company. If the roles were reversed, and Russia was funding influencers to do this, there would be a criminal investigation!

Mario Zelaya

57,291 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

I was 14/15 years old, living in Karachi, at the time 9/11 happened. The head principal of our school led victory cheers at the morning parade. Many people were jubilant. There was a sense in many that now was the time for all muslim armies to join together - a common dream that springs up every time there is even a little attack on any Western country. A wet dream of many Muslims across the spectrum, one day the Ummah will come together and fight the West. Even Mushraf took a few days to react one way or another, finally coming out to condemn the attacks to the disappointment of many Pakistanis. Make no mistake, Muslims are not your friends. Especially those from the subcontinent. They are the biggest majority of the minority in Britain. They are all bidding their time till they can act for their Ummah. Many people need to wake up. No, I am not being mean, or harsh, or unfair. It is not bigotry to see an ideology and a people who follow it dogmatically for what they are. They see themselves as other. They do not integrate, they do not assimilate. They declare themselves as your enemies by rejecting everything you stand for, while you remain timid to at least take their word for it. This isn't going to end well if you keep hiding from the facts. These are acts of dominance, plain and simple. This is the Muslims shifting from the Makkah phase to the Medina phase. When in Makkah at the start with only a handful of follower, Mohammad along with his band use to pray in private. All the verses were about peace and tolerance and all that jazz. And when he moved to Yathrib, and changed it to Medina, well the tone changed. Everything now could be done openly. Violence, death, glory, and conquest. The verses superseded the ones of before. Abrogation of the before. It is a learned behaviour from their prophet. Wake up before its too late.
0:52

I was 14/15 years old, living in Karachi, at the time 9/11 happened. The head principal of our school led victory cheers at the morning parade. Many people were jubilant. There was a sense in many that now was the time for all muslim armies to join together - a common dream that springs up every time there is even a little attack on any Western country. A wet dream of many Muslims across the spectrum, one day the Ummah will come together and fight the West. Even Mushraf took a few days to react one way or another, finally coming out to condemn the attacks to the disappointment of many Pakistanis. Make no mistake, Muslims are not your friends. Especially those from the subcontinent. They are the biggest majority of the minority in Britain. They are all bidding their time till they can act for their Ummah. Many people need to wake up. No, I am not being mean, or harsh, or unfair. It is not bigotry to see an ideology and a people who follow it dogmatically for what they are. They see themselves as other. They do not integrate, they do not assimilate. They declare themselves as your enemies by rejecting everything you stand for, while you remain timid to at least take their word for it. This isn't going to end well if you keep hiding from the facts. These are acts of dominance, plain and simple. This is the Muslims shifting from the Makkah phase to the Medina phase. When in Makkah at the start with only a handful of follower, Mohammad along with his band use to pray in private. All the verses were about peace and tolerance and all that jazz. And when he moved to Yathrib, and changed it to Medina, well the tone changed. Everything now could be done openly. Violence, death, glory, and conquest. The verses superseded the ones of before. Abrogation of the before. It is a learned behaviour from their prophet. Wake up before its too late.

Momus Najmi

89,613 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I do not know how these people got from a 46-year-old man smacking his 20-year-old assistant and former student on the rear end in the workplace to men being afraid to change diapers because they're going to be accused of something OR equating it as "separating fathers from their daughters" It's really not the same thing—I am someone who was a champion diaper changer (of female babies), the stinky, smelly ones, who is also against ministers making unwanted physical or sexual contact with those under their spiritual authority (or anyone else for that matter). She wasn't a baby. She wasn't his daughter. Their logic here is that if we decry the 46-year-old man giving unwanted butt slaps to his assistant, it's going to end up keeping fathers from bonding with their actual daughters. That is dumb. It actually makes no sense. (This was after they claimed that if we pursue justice for victims of sexual abuse, it's going to cause believers to take the mark of the beast... I'm not joking...)
0:31

I do not know how these people got from a 46-year-old man smacking his 20-year-old assistant and former student on the rear end in the workplace to men being afraid to change diapers because they're going to be accused of something OR equating it as "separating fathers from their daughters" It's really not the same thing—I am someone who was a champion diaper changer (of female babies), the stinky, smelly ones, who is also against ministers making unwanted physical or sexual contact with those under their spiritual authority (or anyone else for that matter). She wasn't a baby. She wasn't his daughter. Their logic here is that if we decry the 46-year-old man giving unwanted butt slaps to his assistant, it's going to end up keeping fathers from bonding with their actual daughters. That is dumb. It actually makes no sense. (This was after they claimed that if we pursue justice for victims of sexual abuse, it's going to cause believers to take the mark of the beast... I'm not joking...)

Ron Cantor

16,369 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇮🇷| WATCH: Never-seen-before footage from the 12-day war against Israel During an interview with IRGC missile launch crewmen, they retell a story on how they launched missiles against Israel while being under fire from Zionists. The crewman says during a wave of missile launches, the Israelis had targeted a TEL (missile launcher) that was ready to shoot. This caused the missile to explode causing for fragmented explosions, causing the injury of the crewman (the same one who’s speaking in the interview). The next crewman, responsible for a different launcher few meters away, sees a fragment of the missile heading towards himself. He says he quickly ducked on the ground and saw the fragment fly over him, where the heat caused burning injuries. This however didn’t stop him, he quickly ran to his TEL and launched his missile, which was successful. 4 other missiles were launched from the same spot, and all 4 hit their inteded targets with pinpoint accuracy.
16:46

🇮🇷| WATCH: Never-seen-before footage from the 12-day war against Israel During an interview with IRGC missile launch crewmen, they retell a story on how they launched missiles against Israel while being under fire from Zionists. The crewman says during a wave of missile launches, the Israelis had targeted a TEL (missile launcher) that was ready to shoot. This caused the missile to explode causing for fragmented explosions, causing the injury of the crewman (the same one who’s speaking in the interview). The next crewman, responsible for a different launcher few meters away, sees a fragment of the missile heading towards himself. He says he quickly ducked on the ground and saw the fragment fly over him, where the heat caused burning injuries. This however didn’t stop him, he quickly ran to his TEL and launched his missile, which was successful. 4 other missiles were launched from the same spot, and all 4 hit their inteded targets with pinpoint accuracy.

Arya - آریا

100,980 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens
5:29

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

203,389 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Real New Yorkers are asked how Zohran Mamdani is going as mayor, they say he is destroying their city and draining their money “There's such a delightful disconnect between how he's doing and how people think he's doing. He's doing terribly. There's homeless everywhere. They're just spending money they don't have But to these kids, just like they spend their parents' money on college, they actually think, "Oh, look, he balanced the budget." No, he borrowed $45 billion from the state, right. Then he deferred tax payments with interest or something. Like, this isn't success. It's not successful to defer payments you owe and to rack up debt to the state. But the problem, of course, people like this, he's so smart. He moved in here. He took advantage of liberal idiots who are not the people who voted, by the way — only, like, 10% of the city voted in the mayoral election — The people making the city make money are not voting for him. It's random losers. It's liberal white women. It's college students. It's Muslims. They voted for him, and now he took this thing that was built by the rich, that was built by the successful, and he's draining it of assets — It was never his to destroy, but it's his now” - Brookerteejones What actually happened was the state gave New York City extra money and permission to push pension payments further into the future Because of this Zohran Mamdani was able to act like the budget was balanced, but all they did was push the payments into the future But here’s what Zohran Mamdani isn’t telling you, by doing that, it means that New York City will actually owe an extra $8 billion over the next decade on top of what they pushed back It’s pure description and it’s bankrupting NYC So again, to give the illusion that the budget is balanced American taxpayers now owe an extra $8 billion they wouldn’t have had to pay because of Zohran Mamdani
2:08

Real New Yorkers are asked how Zohran Mamdani is going as mayor, they say he is destroying their city and draining their money “There's such a delightful disconnect between how he's doing and how people think he's doing. He's doing terribly. There's homeless everywhere. They're just spending money they don't have But to these kids, just like they spend their parents' money on college, they actually think, "Oh, look, he balanced the budget." No, he borrowed $45 billion from the state, right. Then he deferred tax payments with interest or something. Like, this isn't success. It's not successful to defer payments you owe and to rack up debt to the state. But the problem, of course, people like this, he's so smart. He moved in here. He took advantage of liberal idiots who are not the people who voted, by the way — only, like, 10% of the city voted in the mayoral election — The people making the city make money are not voting for him. It's random losers. It's liberal white women. It's college students. It's Muslims. They voted for him, and now he took this thing that was built by the rich, that was built by the successful, and he's draining it of assets — It was never his to destroy, but it's his now” - Brookerteejones What actually happened was the state gave New York City extra money and permission to push pension payments further into the future Because of this Zohran Mamdani was able to act like the budget was balanced, but all they did was push the payments into the future But here’s what Zohran Mamdani isn’t telling you, by doing that, it means that New York City will actually owe an extra $8 billion over the next decade on top of what they pushed back It’s pure description and it’s bankrupting NYC So again, to give the illusion that the budget is balanced American taxpayers now owe an extra $8 billion they wouldn’t have had to pay because of Zohran Mamdani

Wall Street Apes

60,339 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

🚨 Virginian’s… Listen very carefully to what he’s saying — There is hope. James Blair pointed out one of the districts Democrats redrew voted NO to the referendum last night. And Two other districts voted yes, but just barely, and that was again with Trump spending ZERO dollars on this — “These are not slam dunk districts for democrats.” He goes on to again say, the democrats unloaded a lot of their cash on this referendum. (Trump did not)… and he notated democrats STILL have to get past the courts. —“This is illegal what they did under their own state law) and “if the VA Supreme Court does the right thing, this was an ILLEGAL action for this cycle.” President Trump is playing chess right now. He allowed them to take a piece off the board, but Democrats are in CHECK!
0:46

🚨 Virginian’s… Listen very carefully to what he’s saying — There is hope. James Blair pointed out one of the districts Democrats redrew voted NO to the referendum last night. And Two other districts voted yes, but just barely, and that was again with Trump spending ZERO dollars on this — “These are not slam dunk districts for democrats.” He goes on to again say, the democrats unloaded a lot of their cash on this referendum. (Trump did not)… and he notated democrats STILL have to get past the courts. —“This is illegal what they did under their own state law) and “if the VA Supreme Court does the right thing, this was an ILLEGAL action for this cycle.” President Trump is playing chess right now. He allowed them to take a piece off the board, but Democrats are in CHECK!

MJTruthUltra

201,501 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)
2:14

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)

Gangster Cinema Central

97,458 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Now you guys all know, I very rarely put those two clowns on my page, but I must say as a veteran this has me filled with rage. So the handbag was able to go to Texas and go to a basketball game and go give out burgers for wounded warriors, which is not even his program. But he couldn’t go to Germany for their Invictus games that were from the 12th to the 14th? Make it make sense! This man flies all around the world, but all he did is sent in a little video, but yet they’re supposed to rely on him to support veterans in Birmingham? To me this seems like him being out this weekend was more of him trying to hide for the fact that he was not in Germany supporting Invictus in which Australia, Ukraine, and others were part of. How disgusting is this man? I put the pictures in a video from Invictus Germany page.
0:27

Now you guys all know, I very rarely put those two clowns on my page, but I must say as a veteran this has me filled with rage. So the handbag was able to go to Texas and go to a basketball game and go give out burgers for wounded warriors, which is not even his program. But he couldn’t go to Germany for their Invictus games that were from the 12th to the 14th? Make it make sense! This man flies all around the world, but all he did is sent in a little video, but yet they’re supposed to rely on him to support veterans in Birmingham? To me this seems like him being out this weekend was more of him trying to hide for the fact that he was not in Germany supporting Invictus in which Australia, Ukraine, and others were part of. How disgusting is this man? I put the pictures in a video from Invictus Germany page.

Sabirah Lohn 💕🦕🦖

33,519 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

☝️ "Everything that the US did in previous years - the toughest things, thousands of miles away from their national territory - they did without any authorization from the UN Security Council. Under what pretext did they destroy Yugoslavia? Where's Yugoslavia and where is the US? Who gave them the right to strike a European capital? They just decided to, and their satellites ran after them and yapped. That's it, that's all the international law. What was the pretext for the invasion of Iraq? The development of weapons of mass destruction? They went in, destroyed the country, created a hotbed of international terrorism and then said 'our intelligence let us down'. Imagine destroying a country and then saying it was a mistake, there were no weapons of mass destruction. How did they invade Syria? Did the UN Security Council authorize any of this? Whatever they want, they do. But what they are doing now in Ukraine is not thousands of miles away from our national borders; it is on our doorstep. And they must realize that we simply have nowhere else to retreat to." - President Putin
2:08

☝️ "Everything that the US did in previous years - the toughest things, thousands of miles away from their national territory - they did without any authorization from the UN Security Council. Under what pretext did they destroy Yugoslavia? Where's Yugoslavia and where is the US? Who gave them the right to strike a European capital? They just decided to, and their satellites ran after them and yapped. That's it, that's all the international law. What was the pretext for the invasion of Iraq? The development of weapons of mass destruction? They went in, destroyed the country, created a hotbed of international terrorism and then said 'our intelligence let us down'. Imagine destroying a country and then saying it was a mistake, there were no weapons of mass destruction. How did they invade Syria? Did the UN Security Council authorize any of this? Whatever they want, they do. But what they are doing now in Ukraine is not thousands of miles away from our national borders; it is on our doorstep. And they must realize that we simply have nowhere else to retreat to." - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

737,238 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Ponca City Carbon Black: The mystery isn't with the source. The mystery is why the state insists there's no problems. As a lifelong resident, we've known about it for years. The first court settlement from years ago was a dead giveaway. They bought themselves out of being shut down. They bought properties around the plant. Chased family's away from their homes. And then they ignored everyone else. The EPA forced them to make changes to all of their plants across the country. One had to shut down because they couldn't make those changes. The other .... Stayed open. Fast forward to 2026, and it's back. This time with Taiwan owners. It's everywhere. Walk into any building in Ponca and look at the floors....the sidewalks .. the sides of buildings....roofs....your dog's feet .... It's everywhere. Our state DEQ received complaints and didn't investigate it quick enough, and their reply: we don't see it happening. Well no kidding. When you wait a week to make a visit... So, what did they do? They installed air monitors all over Ponca. Not just by city hall....down by the south side of town....and where I am, about 1/2 mile north of their plant. Guess what they measure? PPM of the air. Not type... Not makeup...just the PPM. They had no proof there was an issue. Last week we made the proof. We recorded it from work. Now what will be their excuse? DEQ is failing around here and it doesn't seem like anyone cares except the residents of Ponca. Here are the 3 videos we made. All on a Sunday afternoon...when DEQ wouldn't even be open. Where's that black soot going? Right where the wind takes it. They need to pay to clean this entire town up... Or they need to leave.
0:25

Ponca City Carbon Black: The mystery isn't with the source. The mystery is why the state insists there's no problems. As a lifelong resident, we've known about it for years. The first court settlement from years ago was a dead giveaway. They bought themselves out of being shut down. They bought properties around the plant. Chased family's away from their homes. And then they ignored everyone else. The EPA forced them to make changes to all of their plants across the country. One had to shut down because they couldn't make those changes. The other .... Stayed open. Fast forward to 2026, and it's back. This time with Taiwan owners. It's everywhere. Walk into any building in Ponca and look at the floors....the sidewalks .. the sides of buildings....roofs....your dog's feet .... It's everywhere. Our state DEQ received complaints and didn't investigate it quick enough, and their reply: we don't see it happening. Well no kidding. When you wait a week to make a visit... So, what did they do? They installed air monitors all over Ponca. Not just by city hall....down by the south side of town....and where I am, about 1/2 mile north of their plant. Guess what they measure? PPM of the air. Not type... Not makeup...just the PPM. They had no proof there was an issue. Last week we made the proof. We recorded it from work. Now what will be their excuse? DEQ is failing around here and it doesn't seem like anyone cares except the residents of Ponca. Here are the 3 videos we made. All on a Sunday afternoon...when DEQ wouldn't even be open. Where's that black soot going? Right where the wind takes it. They need to pay to clean this entire town up... Or they need to leave.

🇺🇸 Grumpy Dool 🇺🇸

12,272 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce